Open navigation menu
Close suggestions
Search
Search
en
Change Language
Upload
Sign in
Sign in
Download free for days
0 ratings
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
365 views
Solidworks Simulation
SolidWorks Simulation is a design analysis tool based on a numerical technique called Finite Element Analysis or FEA
Uploaded by
Foks Koks
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here
.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Download now
Download
Save Solidworks Simulation For Later
Download
Save
Save Solidworks Simulation For Later
0%
0% found this document useful, undefined
0%
, undefined
Embed
Share
Print
Report
0 ratings
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
365 views
Solidworks Simulation
SolidWorks Simulation is a design analysis tool based on a numerical technique called Finite Element Analysis or FEA
Uploaded by
Foks Koks
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here
.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Download now
Download
Save Solidworks Simulation For Later
Carousel Previous
Carousel Next
Save
Save Solidworks Simulation For Later
0%
0% found this document useful, undefined
0%
, undefined
Embed
Share
Print
Report
Download now
Download
You are on page 1
/ 504
Search
Fullscreen
SolidWorks® 2011 SolidWorks Simulation Dassault Systémes SolidWorks Corporation 300 Baker Avenue Concord, Massachusetts 01742 USA© 19952010, Dasa yates lors Corton ‘Daum Stimee 8 cpa, 300 Bak Aveo nt, as 61782 USA Al Ris Reseed ‘Thlntemaion adh fia dca ns dome cruitment by Dassault Stes Sold Works Coporaon WsSoiaiost ‘omer maybe es or nite in ay om adethecgros writen pomstn of DS Sodas, ‘Besa dd tha ood tbeterno/the eens, Alimmnies gvenby BS ‘StWiis stot software and came eset fein eee semen nchng a deomed a modifica or aera ofan er fteing wants nthe ens prem Patent Notes DERE SS eats” Saigsereaot san Gane oro aha Same Sma Seow Teco eras HRT A ater nc teint sere pay US. Pe Oommen Soeaelg neta Uso ig ee “Trademarks and Product Names for SolidWorks Products and Services SolidWoas 3D ParSueam NET. 30 ConeeCennl Drains an he eins logo ae abe alc nd Shar ay ed ered (Grout, Fate Plt Xpress, Photons, ‘otal abd Xchange re aca DS Soden Fest Works aregineredademak of Geometi Li Sato 211, SoWerks Entre POM, SoldWons Simao, Sidon Flow Sino a cDruings Profesor! ar rit hanes of DS Soioas ‘hr band ot rod names re rama or repitered ademas of ftrespectve biden ecueat Number: PMTIIAD.ENG sumer conmarensormae- seam a Ted forch a FAR 32257-19(Commreal Compass Soware= ican ha nana camer Ee re ea Seeacre nanny in onetime tte Sere ee Sd Portions ofthis softnare © 1986-2010 Siemens Prodi ‘reenter ge ieeearanare weieaees nay ioierserteag meh ‘rt tr. Fights reserved, Patents Pending, = Peart Sash ct Sr er en Sie aa re ea ae Aare stioee ete SERS Rae aie reseagege semanas ‘Aout Salons. ‘Copyright Notices fr SolidWorks Simulation Prodece ations of is software ©2068 Solero Cmporsion GLSS © 1992-2007 Compton! Applicatons an Sem ipo, ie Afi resere Copyright Notices fr Enterprise POM Product (usin Viewer Tecnology © Cop 192-210, (© Copsright 1995-2010, Onell gk resend Erni Al igi seme Copyright Notices for oDrawings Products tions of hi sofware © 200-2010 Tech So 3D. Potions of hi stare © 198-200 Deamon. Pons f hi sofware 198-2010 Open Dein Dine Al igh reseed Potions of th stare © 1995-209 Spal Capra, “Th satnare tse np on be week fhe Incpendet PEC GrpIntroduction About This Course Prerequisites Course Design Philosophy Using this Book Laboratory Exercises About the Training Files Windows® XP Conventions Used in this Book Use of Color: What is Solid Works Simulation? What Is Finite Element Analysis? Build Mathematical Mode! Defeaturing Idealization Clean-up Build Finite Element Model Solve Finite Element Model Analyze Results Errors in FEA, ContentsContents SoliWorks 2011 Finite Elements. 10 Element Types Available in SolidWorks Simulation 10 First Order Solid Tetrahedral Elements . ul Second Order Solid Tetrahedral Elements 2 First Order Triangular Shell Elements 2B Second Order Triangular Shell Elements : 4 Beam Elements. . 4 ‘Choosing Between Solid and Shell Elements 15 Draft vs. High Solid und Shell Elements : 15 Degrees of Freedom : 1s Calculations in FEA. 16 Interpretation of FEA Results 0 Principal Stresses: PI, P2, and P3, a : 18 Units of Measurement. 19 Limitations of SolidWorks Simulation 19 Linear Material 0 ‘Small Structural Deformations : 20 Static Loads. 21 Summary. ener’) Lesson 1: ‘The Analysis Process Objectives: 23 The Analysis Process 24 Stages in the Process. . m4 Case Study: Stress in a Pate. ey Project Description 24 SolidWorks Simulation Interface o 26 Solid Works Simulation Options 28 Plot Settings... 2» Preprocessing New Study. : - Assigning Material Properties... 2 Fixtures ou Fixture Types - 34 Display/Tlide Symbols oe 35 Extemal Loads « .... 38 Size and Color of Symbols. 41 Preprocessing Summary : : 2 Meshing 8 ‘Curvature Based Mesh a Mesh Density a Element Sizes : B Minimum Number of Elements in a Cirele 44 Ratio 4 Mesh Quality a wi 46‘SolidWorks 2011 ‘contents Postprocessing a Result Plats 7 Editing Plots 48 Nodal vs. Element Stresses... 49 Show as Tensor Plot Option 50 Modilying Result Plots 50 Other Plot Controls. 32 Other Plots 59 Multiple Studies © Creating New Studies 6 Copy Parameters 61 ‘Check Convergence and Accuracy 64 Results Summary 65 ‘Comparison With Analytical Results 66 Reports or Summary o References. o Questions o Exercise I: Bracket. 7 Exercise 2: Compressive Spring Stiffness si Exercise 3: Container Handle a Lesson 2: Mesh Controls, Stress Concentrations and Boundary Conditions Objectives : 8s Mesh Control 86 Case Study: The L Bracket 86 Project Description 86 ‘Sages in the Process 86 Run All Studies. 89 ‘Analysis with Local Mesh Refinement 90) Mesh Conteols, 90 Results 95 Results Comparison 95 Stress Singularities 95 Case Study: Analysis of Bracket witha Filet 7 Case Study: Analysis ofa Welded Bracket. 101 Understanding the Effet of Boundary Congitions 102 Conclusion 103 Summary 108 Questions 104 Exercise 4: C-bracket 10s Exercise S: Bone Wrench 4 Exercise 6: Foundation Bracket 9Contents Lesson 3: ‘Assembly Analysis with Contacts Lesson 4: ‘Symmetrical and Free Self-Equi Objectives: Contact Analysis Case Study: Pliers with Global Contact Project Description Stages in the Process. Applying Materials to Assemblies ‘Component Contact ‘Component Contaet: Options ‘Component Contact: Default setting ‘Component Contact: Hierarchy and Conflicts ‘Viewing Assembly Results Conclusion Handle Contact Required Force - Pliers with Local Contact Local Contact Local Contact Types. [No Penetration Local Contact Options [No Penetration Local Contact: Accuracy [No Penetration Local Contact: Remarks Contact Stresses Summary Questions Exercise 7: Two Ring Assembly rated Assemblies Objectives Shrink Fit Parts Case Study: Shrink Fit Project Description Symmetry... Stages in the Process. Defeaturing Rigid Body Mode Shrink Fit Contact Condition Plot Results in Local Coordinate System Cylindrical Coordinate Systems Saving All Plots What's Wrong Feature .- Analysis with Soft Springs Soft Springs. Inenial Relief SolidWorks 2011 129 1B0 Bo bo Bo BI 132 3 Ba 4 7 2 BS. 138 9 Bo 140 142 143 143 14s 4s 146 147 si 152 152 2152 152 132 2153 2 1SS 156 158 158 162 162 162 163 163SoteWorks 2011 Lesson 5: Summary, Exercise 8: Chain Link Exercise 9: Chain Link 2 Assembly Analysis with Connectors Lesson 6: Objectives Connecting Components Connectors Connector Types Case Study: Vise Grip Plies. Project Description Stages in the Process, Spring Connector Types Spring Connector Options Pin/Bolt Force Summary Exercise 10: Lift Assembly. Exercise 11: Analysis with Base (optional) Exercise 12: Shock Absorber Exercise 13: Spot Welds-Solid Mesh ‘Compatible/incompatible Meshes Lesson 7: Objectives Compatible / Incompatible Meshing. Case Study: Rotor. Project Description Compatible Mesh Incompatible Mesh ‘Automatic Switch to Incompatible Mes Incompatible Bonding Options Discussion. Summary Assembly Analysis Mesh Refinement Objectives Mesh Control in an Assembly Case Study: Cardan Joint Problem Statement Part 1: Draft Quality Coarse Mesh Analysis Remote Load Bolt Tight fit and Diameter Bolt Pre-oad Local Contact Sets No Penetration Local Contact Options Rotational and Axial StilTness Knowledge Base Contents 166 167 182 237 238 238 238 29 240 203 24s 248 248 254 256Contents SolidWorks 2011 Part 2: High Quality Mesh Analysis Required Number of Solid Elements in Thin Features. Aspect Ratio Plot Jacobian Summary Questions Exercise 14: Bolt Connectors Exercise 15: Awning, ‘Components ‘Objectives. Thin Components Case Study: Pulley Project Description Part 1: Mesh with Solid Elements. Symmetry Fixtures Part 2: Refined Solid Mesh, Solid vs. Shell Creating Shell Elements Part 3: Shell Elements ~ Mid-plane Surface Thin vs. Thick Shells Shell Mesh Colors ‘Changing Mesh Orientation Shell Element Alignment ‘Automatic Shell Surface Re-aligment Applying Symmetry Restraints Deformed Results, Results Comparison Computational Effort Case Study: Joist Hanger Project Deseription Summary Questions Exercise 16: Bracket. Exercise 17: Shell Mesh Using Outer/nner Faces. Exercise 18: Spot Welds - Shell mesh Exercise 19: Edge Weld Connector Exercise 20: Container Handle Weld 259 260 260 262 268 268 269 2B 25 276 216 27 277 278 281 283 283 283 285 287 287 289 290 293 206 297 297 208 299SolidWorks 2011 Contents Lesson 9: Mixed Meshing Shells & Solids Objectives... 327 ‘Mixed Meshing Solids and Shells 328 Bonding Shells and Solids 329 Mixed Mesh: Supported Analysis Types . 329 Case Study: Pressure Vessel cio 329 Project Description : 330 ‘Analyze the Assembly 330 Preparing the Mode! : 32 Material. 34 Steel Identification Systems 3M UNS Index 3M Other Indices. 334 ‘Bulk and Shear Moduli 2336 Bonding Entities with Clearance 337 Shell Face o Shell Face Bonding 337 Shell Edge to Shell Face Bonding 337 Shell to Solid Bonded Contact 338 Failure Diagnostics. 341 Meshing Small Features 341 Summary 347 Questions 347 Exercise 21: Mixed Mesh Analysis M9 Lesson 10: Mixed Meshing Solids, Beams & Shells. Objectives, 359 Mixed Meshing, 360 ‘Case Study: Particle Separator 360 Project Description 360 Bement Choices 360 Beam elements 361 Stages in the Process. 361 ‘Beam Mesh 363 Beam Joints: Locations. 365 Beam Joint Types 365 Section Properties 366 ‘Connected and Disconnected Joints 367 Sphere Diameter Defining Beam Joint 368 Cross-seetion Ist and 2nd Directions 33 Bending Moment and Shear Force Diagrams. x Summary 316 Exercise 22: Beam Elements 317 Exercise 23: Cabinet 387 Exercise 24: Frame Rigidity 395contents Lesson 11: Design Study Lesson 12: ‘SolidWorks 2011 Objectives. . Design Study. oo Case Study: Suspension Design Project Description Stages in the Process. Part 1: Multiple Load Cases Desian Studies Parameters. a Design Study Results Design Study Options Part 2: Geometry Modification Design Study Graph Summary Exercise 2 Design Study Thermal Stress Analysis Lesson 13: Adaptive Meshing Objectives ‘Thermal Stress Analysis Case Study: Bimetallie Strip, Project Deseription Material Properties Importing Temperatures Averaging Stress Question Examining Results in Local Coordinate Systems (Optional). Saving Model in its Deformed Shape. 5 Summary. Objectives Adaptive Meshing Case Study: Support Bracket Project Description Geometry Preparation h-Adaptivity Study h-Adaptivity Options b-Adaptive Plots Convergence Graph Review h-adaptive Solution Strain Energy Error is NOT Stress Error 397 398 398 398 398 399 400 405 407 408 412 414 41s a 422 422 22 23 429 431 436 436 438 439 4a 442 442 442 443 447 450 450 451 452SolidWorks 2011 Contents p-Adaptivity Study 453 p-Adaptive Solution Method 43 hs. p Elements 455 Method Comparison 459 hhys. p Elements - Summary 460 ‘Which Solution Method is Better? 461 Summary. 461 Lesson 14: Large Displacement Analysis ‘Objectives 463 ‘Small vs, Large Displacement Analysis 464 Case Study: Clamp 465 Project Description 465 Past 1: Small Displacement Linear Analysis 465 Results Discussion 467 Contact Solution in Small and Large Displacement Analyses. . 467 Part 2: Large Displacement Nonlinear Analysis, 467 Permanent Deformation 469 Solid Works Simulation Premium. 470 Summary. 470 (Questions 470 ‘Appendix A: ‘Meshing, Solvers, and Tips & Tricks Meshing Strategies an Geometry Preparation an Defeaturing, 473 dealization 44 Clean-up 474 Mesh Quality “Aspeet Ratio Check 475 Jacobian Cheek 476 Mesh Controls. 478 Automatic Tvials For Solids. 480 Meshing Stages 480 Failure Diagnostics. 481 ‘Tips for Meshing Parts 481 Tips for Meshing Assemblies 482 Tips for Using Shell Elements 485 Hardware Considerations in Meshing. 484 Solvers in SolidWorks Simulation 484 Choosing a Solver. 485 Appendix B: Customer Help and Assistance ‘Customer Help and Assistance 488Contents SolisWorks 2011,IntroductionIntroduction About This Course Prerequisites Course Design Philosophy Recommended Length Using this Book Laboratory Exercises Sollaworks 2011 The goal of this course is to teach you how to use the Solid Works Simulation software to help you analyze state structural behavior of your SolidWorks part and assembly models The focus ofthis course is on the fundamental skills and concepts ‘central to the successful use of SolidWorks Simulation 2011. You should view the training course manual asa supplement to, and not a replacement for, the system documentation and on-line help. Once you have developed a good foundation in base skills, ou ean refer tothe ‘n-ne help for information on less frequently ucel command options. Students attending this course are expected to have the following: = Mechanical design experience, ‘= Experience with the Windows™ operating system. ‘= Complete the course SolidtWorks Essentials, ‘= Completed the on-line Solid Works Simulation tutorials that are available under Help. You can access the on-line tutorials by clicking Help, SolidWorks Simulation, Tutorial. ‘This course is designed around a process- or task-based approach to training. Rather than focusing on individual features and functions, a process-based traning course emphasizes processes and procedures ‘you should follow to complete a particular task. By utilizing case ‘studies to illustrate these processes, you lear the necessary commands, ‘options, and menus in the context of completing a design task, The minimum recommended length ofthis course is three days ‘This raining manual is intended to be used in classroom environment under the guidance of an experienced SolidWorks Simulation instructor. ts not intended to be a self-paced tutorial. The examples and case studies are designed to be demonstrated “live” by the ‘There may be slight differences in results in certain lessons due to service pack upgrades, et. Laboratory exercises give you the opportunity to apply and practice the material covered during the lecture/demonstration portion of theSolidworks 2011 About the Training Files Windows® XP in this Book Introduction ‘A complete set ofthe various files used throughout this course can be downloaded from the SolidWorks website, wurw.salidworks.com. Click on the link for Suppor, then Training, then Training Files, then ‘SolidWorks Simulation Training Files. Select the link for the desired file set, There may be more than one version of each file set available. Direct URL -worw.solidworks.com/trainingfiiessimulation The files are supplied in signed, sel-extracting executable packages. The files are organized by lesson number. The Case Study Folder within each lesson contains the files your instructor uses while presenting the lessons. The Exereises folder contains any files that are required for doing the laboratory exercises. The sereen shots in this manual were made using SolidWorks 2011 and, SolidWorks Simulation 2011 running on Windows® 7. Ifyou are running on Windows Vista, or XP, you may notice differences in the appearance of the menus and windows, These differences do not affect the performance of the software This manual uses the following typographic conventions: ‘Convention Meaning ‘Bold Sans Serif | SolidWorks Simulation commands and ‘options appear in this style. For example, “Rightclick External Loads and sele Force” means rightclick the External ‘Loads ieon in the SolidWorks Simulation Study tree and select Force from the shorteut Feature names and file names appear inthis style. For example, Double lines precede and follow seetions of the procedures. This provides separation between the steps ofthe procedure and lange blocks of explanatory text. The steps themselves are numbered in sans seribold 17 Do this step,Introduction Use of Color SolidWorks 2014 The Solid Works and SolidWorks Simulation user interface make extensive use of color to highlight selected geometry and to provide you with visual feedback. This greatly inereases the inuitiveness and se of use ofthe SolidWorks Simulation software, To take maximum advantage of this, the training manuals are printed in full colo. Also in many cases, we have Radius somm— used additional color in the illustrations to communicate concepts, identify features, and otherwise convey important information. For example, we right show the fillet areas of a part ina different color, © highlight areas for mesh control, even though by default, the SolidWorks Simulation software would not display the results in that aus Sr Absround |“ Redius 6mm, 4 PacesSolidworks 2011 What is ‘SolidWorks ‘Simulation? Introduction Solid Works Simulation is design analysis tool based on a numerical technique called Finite Element Analysis or FEA, SolidWorks ‘Simulation belongs to the family of engineering analysis soltware products developed by SRAC, now part of SolidWorks Corporation. Established in 1982, SRAC pioneered the implementation of FEA into desktop computing, In 1995, SRAC entered the emerging mainstream FEA software market by partnering with SolidWorks Corporation and creating COSMOS Works software, one of the frst SolidWorks Gold Products. COSMOS Works soon became the top-selling, add-in analysis software for Solid Works Corporation. The commercial success of COSMOSWorks integrated with SolidWorks CAD software resulted in the acquisition of SRAC in 2001 by Dassault Systemes, the parent ‘company of SolidWorks Corporation. In 2003, SRAC merged with SolidWorks Corporation, COSMOS Works was renamed for 2009 to SolidWorks Simulation, Solid Works isa paramette, slid, feature-based CAD system. AS ‘opposed to many other CAD systems that were originally developed in ‘a UNIX envionment and only later ported to Windows, Solid Works has, from the very beginning, been developed specifically for the ‘Windows operating system. SolidWorks Simulation has also been specifically developed for the Windows operating system. Full integration between Solid Works and Solid Works Simulation i possible ‘because both ofthe programs are native Windows OS applications. Solid Works Simulation comes in different “bundles”, or applications, designed to best suit the needs of different users. With the exception of Solid Works SimulationXpress, which i an integral part of SolidWorks, all SolidWorks Simulation bundles are add-ins. A brief description of the capabilities of different bundles is as follows: ‘SolidWorks SimulationXpress The static analysis of parts with simple types of loads and supports. ‘SolidWorks Simulation The static analysis of parts and assemblies. SolidWorks Simulation Professional The stati, thermal, buckling, Frequency, drop test, optimization and fatigue analysis of parts and assemblies SolidWorks Simulation Premium All capabilities of Solid Works Simulation Professional plus nonlinear and dynamic analyses In this volume, we introduce Solid Works Simulation through a seties of hhands-on lessons intermixed with FEA fundamentals. We recommend that you study the lessons in the order presented in the text. As you zo through the lessons, note that explanations and steps described in detail in earlier lessons are not repeated laterIntroduction What Is Finite Element Analysis? ‘soidWorks 2011 Each subsequent lesson assumes familiarity with software funetions and the FEA background discussed in previous lessons. Each lesson builds on the skills and experience gained from the previous lessons, Before we proveed with the lessons, let us construct a foundation for ‘our skills in SolidWorks Simulation by taking a closer look at what Finite Element Analysis is and how it works, In mathematical terms, FEA, also known as the Finite Element Method, is a numerical technique of solving field problems described by a set of partial differential equations. Those types of problems are commonly found in many engineering disciplines, such as machine design, acoustics, electromagnetism, soil mechanics, luid dynamics, and ‘others. In mechanical engineering, FEA is widely used for solving structural, vibration, and thermal problems. FEA is not the only too! available for numerical analysis, Other ‘numerical methods used in engineering includ the Finite Difference Method, Boundary Element Method, or Finite Volumes Method. However, due to its versatility and high numerical efficieney, FEA has ccome to dominate the software market for engineering analysis, while ‘other methods have been relegated to niche applications. Using FEA, ‘we can analyze any shape, use various ways o idealize geometry and produce results with the desired accuracy. FEA theory, numerical problem formulation, and solution methods become completely transparent to users when implemented into modern commercial software, including Solid Works Simulation. A powerfl tool for engineering analysis, FEA is used to solve problems ranging from very simple to very complex. Design engineers use FEA during the product development process to analyze the design-in-progress. Time constrains and limited availability of product data call for many simplifications of the analysis models. At the other end of scale, specialized analysts implement FEA to solve very advanced problems, such as vehiele erash dynamics, metal forming, or analysis of biostructures.Soliaworks 2011 Introduction Regardless ofthe project complexity or the field of application, the fndamental steps in any FEA project are always the same, he it for ‘example a structural, thermal, or acoustic analysis. The starting point for any analysis isthe geometric model. In our ease, this isa SolidWorks model of a part or an assembly. To this model, we assign ‘material properties, and define loads and restraints. Next, as always the case when using.a tool based on the method of numerical approximations, we discretize the mode! intended for analysis. ‘The discretization process, beter known as meshing, splits the ‘geometry into relatively small and simply-shaped entities, called Finite tlements, The elements are called “finite” to emphasize the fact that they are nol infinitesimally small, but only reasonably small in ‘comparison tothe overall model size. ‘When working with finite elements, the FEA solver approximates the ‘wanted solution (for example, deformations or stresses forthe entire siodel withthe assembly of simple solutions for individual elements. From the perspective of FEA software, each application of FEA, requires three steps: Preprocessing ‘The type of analysis (estate, thermal, frequency), material properties, londs and restraints are defined and the model is split into Finite elements. Solution ‘Computing the desired results. Postprocessing Analyzing the results, We fallow the preceding three steps every time we use SolidWorks Simulation. rom the perspective of FEA methodology, we list the following FEA steps: Building the mathematical model ‘Building the Finite element model w the Finite element model lyzing the results 1 2 3 4Introduction Build Mathematical Model Defeaturing Idealization Clean-up ‘SolidWorks 2011 Analysis with SolidWorks Simulation starts wit the geometry represented by a SolidWorks model ofa part or assembly. This ‘geometry must be meshable into a correct and reasonably smal, finite element mesh, By small, we do not refer tothe element size, bu the ‘number of elements in the mesh. This requirement of meshabilty has very important implications. We must ensure that the CAD geometry indeed meshes and thatthe produced mesh provides the correct solution ofthe data of interest, such as displacements, stresses, temperature distribution, and So on. Often, but not always, this nevessity of meshing requires modifications to the CAD geometry. Such modifications can take the form of
‘The mode! willbe meshed using High” rae qual elements en) Expand all the sections of the er eer atiemt Property Manager to see all the available Boome choices = 1 Smo geen Fe Sot the mosh density, om The default mesh density will have the slider ate miescale. Under Mesh Parameter, the a ‘Maximum element size and Minimum element & 0 sizeof the mesh is shown as 6.72453 mm om = {0.2254 in}. the Min number of elements ina) Circle is 8, and the Element size growth ratio is “mArmmin + 4.5, For the intial analysis, we will use the —— default setting “Lesson 4 The nati Process Mesh Quality Note Display/Hide Mesh 7 SolidWorks 2011 The mesh ean be created with either @ High or Draft mesh quality. The ‘default is to use a High quality mesh. To use a draft quality mesh, you must select it inthe Property Manager under Advanced options The difference between High and Draft quality is that: ‘= Draft quality mesh uses frst order elements, '= High quality mesh uses second order elements, The differences between first and second order elements are discussed in Element Types Available in SolidWorks Simulation in the Introduction to FEA chaptet ‘Set mesh quality In the Advanced section, clear Draft Quality Mesh, ‘We will review the other mesh options as we proceed withthe class Click OK to generate the mesh, The mesh appears after mesh ‘generation is completed, ‘The Mesh icon in the SolidWorks Simulation Study tree window now displays a green check mark to indicate that meshing has been successfully completed ‘We named this study default analysis with the intention of using the default mesh size. Later on inthis lesson the problem will be solved again with coarse and fine meshes. Mesh visibility can be controlled by right-clicking Mesh, and then doing one of the following: = Select Hide Mesh, = Select Show MeshSolidWorks 2011 Postprocessing Result Plots 9 Lesson 1 ‘The Anaya Process fun the anaiysis — fight soy co dtan: “re Ea analysis an set Run te ES oo a = You can monitor or pause the solution in the solver window while —— the analysis is running, Cece) Cora | [After the analysis is complete, SolidWorks Simulation automatically creates the Results folder with the default results plots that we specified atthe beginning of the lesson: Stress] (-vonMises:), Displacement! (Res disp-), and Strain} -Bquivalent-). ach result plot can be displayed by doing matwaracoma ‘one ofthe following: erase aca = Double-click the desired plot icon gn (Btress1, for example). Bair te tem @ Right-click the desired plot icon Seen (iress1, for example) and select Show emsterrse, under any folder. Barone White a plot is active (appears in the model window) you ean right- «lick the plot icon again to examine the plot contra options, Show and edit Stress1 (-vonMises-) plot. Double-click on Stress] CvonBMises-) under the Results folder to display the plot.Lesson 1 Tie Anais Process Editing Plots Solidworks 2011 "Notice that the stress plot isin Mega-pascals (Nimm*2) units and the legend features scientific numbers with sx digits, just as we requested in the Options at the beginning ofthe lesson, ‘We observe that the maximum value of Von Mises stress is 408 MPa, which significantly exceeds the yield stress of the material, 206 MPa, indicated by the red marker in following the chart. ‘Toedit a plot rightclick onthe plot and select Edit Sram definition, xs ‘The Display dialog lets you specify a stress ‘component, units, and the type of plo ‘The Advanced Options dialog lets you choose to plot either Node or Element values which is discussed below, ‘The Show as tensor plot option lets users plot the orientation as well as the magnitudes of the principle stresses (shown inthe discussion below), ‘The Deformed Shape dialog lets the user specify the deformation scale for th plot. Automatic (default), True scale, and User Defined scale “options ae available ‘Students are encouraged to experiment with these options,Solisworks 2011 Nodal vs. Element Stresses Lesson 1 ‘Te Anata Proceat “The following figures show the nodal and elemental values of the Von Minos stress for our madel Element Values The stress plot that displays Nodal values appears "smooth", while the stress plot that displays Element values appears “rough”. To understand the reasons for these diferent appearances, we need to explain the differences between nodal and element stresses, During the solution process in each element, stress results are calculated at certain locations called Gauss points. First order tetrahedral element (draft quality) have one Gauss point in their volume. Second order tetrahedral elements huve four Gauss points. First order shell elements have one Gauss point. Sevond order shell clement have three Gauss points.Lesson 1 The Aas Process Nodal Values. Element Values ‘Show as Tensor Plot Option Modifying Result Plots 0 Solisworks 2011 Stresses in Gauss points ean be extrapolated to element nodes. Most often, one node is shared by several cata oss denen re sites techno ® Reyes fumall soce cements rein segs Sina sg vtec meee ares averaging produces averaged (or nol) Alternately, the stress values from all Gauss points within each element can be averaged to report a single elemental stress, Although these slresses are averaged between Gauss points, they are called non- averaged stresses (or element stresses) because the averaging is done internally within the same element only. Element stresses and nodal stresses are alway’ different, but to large @ difference indicates thatthe mesh is not sufficiently refined in that location, Sce the exercise Exercise I: Bracket on page 71 forthe practical use of these quantities. ‘This plot type helps visualize the ditections as wel asthe magnitudes ‘of the principal stresses P1, P2, and P3. Due to the considerable differences in magnitudes between these stess values, one must zoom in substantially to see all three arrows. KK. SS +o SS ‘The Results plots can be modified in several ways to suit your needs. ‘There are three primary functions to control the content, units, display and annotations of the plots = Edit Definition Edit Definition controls the component (von Mises, Ist principal stress, X normal stress) and units to be displayed.Solidworks 2011 Lesson t ‘The Ansys Proctes ‘= Chart Options ‘Chart Options control the annotations, Options include which annotations are shown as well as the color, type of units (Scientific, floating, general) and the number of decimal places shown in the legend. The position ofthe legend and titles ean also be adjusted. = Settings stings are used to control the display of the model. Where to Find It ‘= Right-click a plot and select either Edit Definition, Chart Options ‘or Settings, 20 Modify the chart. Right-click Stress -voniMlises:) and select Chart Options. Check Show min annotation and Show max annotation boxes to show the markers in the plot [Note that you ean also modify the limiting values in the chart, format of the numbers, and the color options, I'you select the char, it will be framed. You can then drag the chart to any location on the plot Click OK to save new settings. ‘brag charto naw oeton a = Ps. = Nf —Lesson 1 The aie Process Other Plot Controls, Introducing: Section Plot Where to Find It Introducing: Iso Plots. Where to Find It Introducing: Probe Where to Find It a Solidworks 2011 Modify settings of stress plot. Right-click on Stress] CvonMises-) and select vx Settings, a Explore the Fringe, Boundary, and Deformed Plot Options in this dialog There are several other plot types available to display specific results of the analysis. Sections plots allow a cutting plane to be positioned at any point inthe ‘model and the plotted results shown at the plane location, = Right-click an existing plot and select Section Clipping Iso plots show that part of a model where the plotted parameter is a certain value or between certain value 1 Right-click an existing plot and select Iso Clipping, A probe allows you to select a point or points on the model and display the plot parameter in both tabular and plotted form, ‘= Right-click a plot and select Probe, Greate section plot. pens In many applications itis useful to cut the $= ‘model and look at the distribution of the Earns result quantity in the through-thickness Rew. direction, Brant Right-click Stress) GvonBises-) and eam select Section Clipping, Zp From the SolidWorks fly-out menu, select ect Right plane as a Reference entity, ai.SolidWorks 2011 Lesson 1 ‘he Anaya Process Students are encouraged to explore all the options and parameters in the Section dialog. Note thatthe user ean also diag the triad to easily move the eut plane through the model ea oernamten Exc) Use Reverse Clipping Direction 2 and Clipping On/Oft # to control the cutting direction and to disable the section pot. Click OK to close the Seetion dialog. =Lesson 1 The Anas Process SolidWorks 2011 23 Croate Iso plot. Suppose that we wish fo display portions ofthe ‘model where the von Mises stress is between 170 jm ‘MPa and 275 MPa, Right-click on Stress] (-vonMises-) and select so Clipping. This opens the Ise Clipping PropertyManager. Inthe tsovalue box, under the Igo4 dialog, enter 275 Niinin*2 [MPa} [39,886 psi) ‘Check Iso 2 and in the Isovalue box, enter 170 NY smm*2 [MPa] [24,657 psi) Click OK. ‘The black arrows on the stress legend indicate the values defined for the two iso surfaces. Experiment with the Iso Clipping window options using different humbers of iso surfaces and different cutting directions, Use Reverse Clipping Direction (and Clipping On/Off to ‘control the cutting dieetion and to reset the plot.SolieWorks 2011 Lesson 1 The Ansys Process 24 Probe stress results. Right-click on Otress CvonMiaos ) and seleet Probe, Using the pointer, click the desired locations on the plot. It helps to zoom in on the area Te stress results are listed in the Results dialog table and in the plo at the selected locations. aoe ‘Under Report Option, you can save the results in a file, plot the path graph, oF save the locations as sensors. (Sensors are discussed in detail Tater om in the class.)Lesson 4 SolidWorks 2011 {he nails Process The figure above shows a Von Mises stres path plot forthe selected Aocatons 25 Define Pt 1st Principle Stress amy plot. neta Define anew stress plot Right-click an the Results folder and select Define opamp Stress Plot ge Select Pt: 4st Principle Stress as the stress ‘component, keep all other default options, and click OK.SolidWorks 2011 Lesson We observe that the maximum value ofthe Ist principle stress, 416 MPa [60,304 psi, is very close to the maximum value of the Von Mises stress, 408 MPa [59,218 psi). This is because the specified Tensile load is the only dominant load component resulting in predominantly tensile stress along the longitudinal direction of the plate 26 Define displacement plot. Double-click the Displacement CRes disp») plot icon, The post processing features that we practiced in the ease of Stress Cvonbises:) are applicable to all other result quantities, such as Displacement. The displacement shows a maximum resultant displacement of (0.1435 mm [0.00565 in]. b> = TO _ZE= ~ a sLesson t “ihe Aaa Procear Note ar 28 SolidWorks 2011 We record the displacement result with 6 digits only to practice the plot ‘options and to compare results from studies with different meshes. The uncertainties and simplifying assumptions used to create the model do not justify this accuracy. ‘Superimpose undeformed shape. amas Right-click on Displecement1CRes disp-) and” essa” slet Settings. feared Select Superimpose model on the deformed a ‘shape. You can also adjust the taneparency ofthe i undeformed image Click OK. ‘Animate displacement plot. To animate the displacement plot, ight- click on Displacement] CRes disp) $zeewey and select Animate. eo In the Animation PropertyManager you can start and stop the animation, st the number of frames, control the speed, and save the animation as an avi file Try the options ofthe animation featureSaliaorks 2011 Other Plots. Introducing: Factor of Safety Plot Where to Find it Introducing: Fatigue Check Plot Where to Find It Lesson 4 ‘Tre Anaya Process 29 ot strain results. Double-click the Strain! CiBquivalent-) plot icon to show the plot Note that strain results are dimensionless Strain esulls are shown as non-averaged (clement values) by default as ‘opposed to stress results, which are shown as averaged (node values) by default Examine the strain plot showing Element Values. To review the averaged strain plo, right-click on Strain Equivalent-) and select Edit Definition, and then select Node Values. To examine the available chart options, right-click Strain (Equivalent and select Edit D Al post processing features that we prac available for strain plots as well ed forthe stress plot are There are several other posiprocess the end of the analysis Factor of Safety Plot show the safety of the design based on the design strength ofthe material (typically the yield strength). Ths plot is fully introduced in Lesson 7. quantities available to view a ‘am Rightelick the Results folder and select D Plot Fatigue Check Plot serves a a quick indicator ifthe fatigue may be of ‘any concern inthe design of the component. ine Factor of Safety 1 Right-click the Results folder and select Define Fatigue Check Plot,Lesson 1 The Anale Process Important! 30 Multiple Studies SolidWorks 2011 The fatigue check plot is only available if you have Simulation Professional Plot Fatigue Check Plot. Right-click on the Results folder and select Define ¥ * # Fatigue Check Plot. om . Set the Loading type to On/Off Loading to indicate “r= that the Tensile force may oscillate between 0 and, 3 110,000 N. — Sct the Surface Finish Factor to Machined. Keep == the Loading Factor and Size Factor at their default |" values of Axial and 0.75 + <2 Under Material keep the Scale this value and is os imum safety factor fields at their default values | sneer oft — 2 Click OK. =. The areas in red indicate potential fatigue problems. Note that accurate calculations using the Solid Works Simulation Professional fatigue ‘modulus may be required. We have completed the analysis of rectangular hollow plate with a coarse mesh and now wish to see how a change in mesh density affects the results. For this reason, we will repeat the analysis two more times using both coarser and finer density meshes, To repeat the analysis with coarsened mesh, we ean ereate a new While stil in the defauit anatysis study, but this action would overwrite the old results To preserve the results ofthe study, we will ereate a new study, coarse analysis, Creating a new study can be done in several waySolidworks 2011 Creating New Studios. Copy Parameters Note a” Lesson 1 The Anais Process New studies ean be ereated in one of two ways: ac 2 new study from serateh ‘= Duplicate an existing study, Right-click the tab forthe study you ‘want to duplicate and click Duplicate, This is essentially the same as copying a study and pasting it into a blank study. When we duplicate a study, Solid Works, Simulation displays the Define Study Name window. This will allow us t0 name the duplicated study and choose the ‘model configuration to use When we ereate a new study, we ean copy material, fixtures a extemal forees from existing studies rather than recreating them in the ‘new study. To copy parameters drag the parameter from the Simulation Study tee to the tab of the new study. ‘When a study is duplicated, the study setings, Fixtures, External Forces, Mesh, and the study results will be copied as well Duplicate the study. Right-click the default analysis tab and click Duplicate. “Type coarse analysis for the study name, The model only has a Default configuration, so we cannot change Create new mesh in coarse analysis study. Inthe coarse analysis study, right-click Mesh and select Create Mesh. A waming window appears. ‘Remeshing will delete the results for study: coarse analysis. Click OK to open the Mesh window: aLesson 1 The Ample Process Note Soliaworks 2011 Move the Mesh Factor slider all the way to the left. The Maximum element size and Minimum vx element size should read 11.4491 mm (0.4508 in} Click OK. The generated mesh is displayed tothe right. [Notice that there is only ‘one element across the thickness ofthe part. In the default analysis there were two elements cross the thickness The mesh is ater coarse, Later, we wil discuss why this sr of mesh isnot acceptable for reliable analysis results 8 aint seaea tne a Having created the mesh, we can access the detailed mesh [seen information by right-clicking Mesh ioiein and selecting Details | ‘The same detailed information i J ‘of course be displayed for the ie | mesh inthe default analysis study, ‘Many ofthe items inthis list will be discussed in later lessons L 34 Run the analysis.SoliaWorks 2011 Note Lesson t 35 View displacement and stross results. Record the maximum displacement (0.143 mm / 0.00863 in) and the ‘maximum von Mises stress (403 Mpa / 58,393 psi). Al plot setings remain the same as the default analysis study ‘because the plot definitions are copied from that study. 36 Re-run the analysis with fine mesh. Repeat steps 31 - 34 to generate a new study with fine mesh named ‘Ane analysis. When re-generating the mesh, move the slider all the way to the tight. The Maximum element size and Minimum element size should read 2.86227 mm (0.1127 i}. ‘The fine mesh generated using the above settings is shown tothe right. Notice that we now have several elements in the theough-thickness direction, You will later learn that this mesh is acceptable for reliable analysis results, 37 View displacement and stress results. Record the maximum displacement (0.144 mm / 0.005 maximum von Mises stress (415 Mpa / 60,252 ps). 7 in) and theLesson 1 Theale Process Check Convergence and ‘Accuracy Soliaworks 2011 [Now we must collect information from all ofthe studies (default, coarse and fine analysis) to compare the displacement and ‘maximum von Mises stress results forthe various mesh refinements, ‘We can determine the maximum displacement and the maximum von Mises stress results in plots We must also determine the number of elements and the number of rnodes in each mesh. These ean be found in the Mesh Details window of each respective mesh, Finally, we must determine the number of degrees of fredlom (DOF) in ‘cach model. To calculate this number, we could count the number of "unconstrained nodes by subtracting the number of nodes on the ‘constrained face from the number nodes reported in mesh details. Then ‘we could multiply this number by three because each node in a solid clement mesh has 3 DOF. An easier method, however, ist right-click the Results folder in each study and select Solver Messages (see below), iow aoWer messages. a pn Righvclickon Results andchoose — $amzs Morin Solver Messages. Not the = number ofelomens, ods and Slams degres of tom, =. es cee maneSolidWorks 2011 Lesson 1 The Anayas Process Results Summary The summary ofthe results produced by the three studies is shown in the following cable: Max | tas vs Nem eth | apse: | MI | umber | SMM | Number a 2s, | so | amos | oes | tins | 207 susioos | 4og200 | agar | sor | tase ssso7 | aisao7 | stoor | oxsit | ros2es Note that all ofthe results ofthis table pertain to the same problem. The only difference is in the mesh density. You may find small differences between your own results and those presented inthis table. This is due to service pack upgrades, etc, Having noted thatthe maximum displacement increases with mesh refinement, we can conclude that the model becomes less stiff (or softer) when the number of degrees of freedom increases. In our case, by selecting second order elements, we impose the assumption thatthe displacement field in each element is described by second order polynomial functions. With mesh refinement, the displacement field in each element is tll described by second order polynomial functions; however, the larger ‘number of elements makes it possible to approximate the rel displacement and stress fields more accurately. We can say that the antici constraints resulting fom element
ce > att ag = SEMA a” WoDRT ~ C00 a0yx00 3) 20(9 198) nay 7 Ky®q 7 1835335 (2.28568) ~ 409.87MP Review the P1: 4st principle stress plot for study default analysis. ‘The maximum value reached 415.78 MPa, which corresponds to approximately 60.3 ksi Therefore the differe alSolutions -THEOR' ‘NomeriealSorations Num difference = ‘The difference of 1.42% between the Solid Works Simulation result and the analytical solution does not necessarily mean thatthe SolidWorks Simulation result is worse and has a 1.42% error. \We must be very careful in how we compare these results, Note that the analytical solution is valid only fora very thin plate where a plane stress condition is assumed. Solid Works Simulation calculates a solution fora 3D model with substantial thickness (10 mm) and accounts for realisti stress distribution across the plate thickness Solid Works Simulation also takes into consideration the fact that the plate has finite length (200 mam) rather that an infinite one, as the analytical solution does Furthermore, detailed inspection ofthe stress results show the stress gradient across the plate thickness, which is not accounted for in the analytical model. Thus, we can conclude that Solid Works Simulation provides more detailed stress information than the analytical solution.Soliaworks 2011 Reports Where to Find It 39 Lesson t ‘The Anata Proceae Results may need to be recorded in report form for review, presentation ‘oF archive purpuscs. Reports can be published in Microsoft Word format Different sections can he added to the report from a list of predefined commonly used topics. The default settings forthe Reports can be found in the ‘Simulation, Options menu, Predefined sections include: Deseription Model Information Units Loads and Fixtures Contact Information Sensor Details Beams Conclusion Assumptions. Study Properties “Material Properties Connector Definitions Mesh Information Resultant Forces Study Results Appendix To edit the content of a section, select the seetion in the Included. seetions and fll in the appropriate section properties. = Click Reports in the Simulation menu, © Click Report on the Simulation toolbar Click Report afer on the Simulation tab of the CommandManager. Generate report in Microsoft Word format. in| maw on Under SolidWorks Simulation men item, °@ sm, 7 select Report oe 7 orLesson 1 Solidworks 2011 The Anti Process 40 Add sections. Under Report sections, select the required report parts. (For example, ‘you could deselect the option Contact Information, as we do not have ny in tis analysis.) Enter your Header information and click Publish. 41. Examine the report. ‘Open the report in Microsoft Word and examine the results 42 Save and Close the file.Soliworks 201 Summary References Questions Lesson 1 ‘The Ansys Process We used a simple mode! ofa hollow rectangular plate to introduce the Solid Works Simulation interface and, atthe same time, to go through all major steps in the FEA process. We ereated multiple studies to execute a linear state analysis with three different meshes, While preparing models for analysis and examining results obtained with dilTerent meshes, we introduced the concept of modeling error and discretization errr, This first lesson was intended to provide an understanding of FEA methodology and the software skills necessary to complete the lessons that follow. 1. Young and Budynas, Roark’s Formulas for Stress and Strain, 7h Edition, ‘= The pre-processing stage ofthe FEA includes the following steps: ‘= The density of Finite element mesh (does / does not) have considerable impact on the analysis results ‘a In general, we would favor (Finer / coarser) meshes to obtain reliable analysis results. Therefore, the time required to solve the analysis will (increase / decrease), but this isan unavoidable ccansequenee: Ultimately, we will ry to design optimum meshes providing, reasonable aecuracy levels and resulting in acceptable runtimes. ‘= The primary unknown infinite clement analysis is (displacements strains / stresses), This quantity is therefore the most accurate ‘= The accuracy levels of (displacements / strains / stresses) and (displacements strains / stresses) are approximately the same, but significantly worse than that of (displacements! strains / stresses). Therefore, to oblain good (displacement / strain / stress) results, the mesh must be reasonably fine, ‘© (Refining / Coarsening) the mesh results in solutions approaching, the analytical solution of a mathematical modeLesson 1 Solidworks 2011 The Aas ProcessSoliWorks 2011 Exercise 1: Bracket Problem ‘Statement Exercise 1 In this frst exercise, you will analyze a simple part with a single restraint and one extemal force This lab uses the folowing skill: = Fistures on page 34 = Exiernal Loads on page 38. Meshing on page 43. 8 Multiple Stulies on page 60, The aluminum part ofan assembly will be analyzed for its ‘maximum stresses and displacements. The partis bolted tothe rest ofthe assembly through the to bolt holes, as indicated in the figure. The partis then subjected to a normal foree of $00 N, applied to the counter bored face. Open a part file. Open part from the Lesson01\Bxereises folder Specify SolidWorks Simulation options. Sclect Options in the Simulation mens. Bot holes Select the Default Options tah, specily SI (MKS) as a default Units for this analysis. Inthe Units dialog, set the Length/Displacement and Pressure/Stress fils to mm and Nimm? (MPa), respectively. nexercise n SolaWorks 2011, ‘The following default results plots are generated after each static study is completed: nodal von Mises stress and resultant displacement, Right-click on the Static Study Results folder and select Add New Plot. Add an additional result plot for the nodal P1: 4st principle ‘stress be generated a a default result plot Specily the subfolder results inthe SolidWorks document directory as ‘location to store the result fils. Number format. seats Select Color chart. Select oe Scientific and 2 decimal places. Sema Define a static study. ° Create new static study named stress analysis.‘SolidWorks 2011 rercise + ‘Apply material properties. Eemenetcenss Right-click om the Pare folder inthe I FeatureManager and select ApplylEdit 9" nrwtmarne Material. a a. Specify Aluminum 1980 Alloy from the — solidworks materials library nSotiaWorks 2011, 6 Apply Fixtures. Apply Fixed Geometry tothe two bolt holes, as shown in the figure below: This restraint simulates the way this partis attached tothe ret of the assembly, Fixed Geometry fixtures are used in this exercise to model the bolted connections mounting the bracket to the other pars ofthe larger assembly. Also, the presence of the other parts to which this bracket is attached i ignored in this exercise. ‘You will learn inthe later lessons that more accurate and elegant methods and features, such as bolt connectors and virtual wall, exist to simulate these conditions 7 Apply external load. ‘Apply normal force on the = face indicated inthe figure. Specify a magnitude of ‘500 N.SolidWorks 2011 Exercise 4 8 Mesh. “Mesh the mode! using Miah quality elements with the default clement 9 Run the study. 10 Plot stress results. We observe that the maximum von Mises stess in the model is approximately 35.1 MPa, which is above the yield strength of the 1060 ‘Aluminum Alloy (27.5 MPa).Exercise 1 1% " Soliaworks 2011 ‘The distribution of the PA: 1st principle stress indicates a maximum value of approximately 32.6 MPa. This value corresponds to the ‘maximum tensile stress inthe part (maximum compressive stress ‘where the value is negative), Probe stress on the fillet. Later in the eourse you will lear thatthe fixtures may result in stress intensifieations which are not real. For this reason, we will focus our attention to the filleted region between the horizontal, and vertical bosses on the pat. Right-click the Stress! folder and click Probe. Sclect On selected entities, then pick the seven faces ofthe fillet between the two bosses. Click Update.‘SolidWorks 2011 Exercise 1 Probing the results on selected faces we sce that the maximum stress at this sress concentration region is 31.4 MPa [4,547 psi, which is slightly above the yield strength of 27.5 MPa [3,989 psi) 12 Plot displacement results. We observe the maximum resultant displacement of approximately (0.068 mam [0.0027 in} | gi =Exercise 1 ‘Coarse Mesh and Element Stress 7” B 4 SotaWorks 2011 Are our current results accurate enough? Visual inspection of our finite clement mesh suggests that it may be rather coarse, especially in the regions where the fillets are present. Furthermore, inspection of the distribution ofthe elemental values ofthe von Mises stress indicates considerable stress jumps from element-o-element in the higher stress concentration ares. > j= ‘We will repeat the analysis with finer mesh, CCreato new static study. Duplicate the study Static analysis as a new study named stress analysis - refined. ‘The folders Fixtures, Kxtornal Loads, Parts, Mesh, and Results will be copied into the new study as well, Create fine mesh. Create High quality mesh. Slide the Mesh Density sider all the way to the right which will result in an Maximum element size of 2.198 mm and a Minimum element size of0.733 mm.SolidWorks 2011 8 16 7 Exercise t “The resulting mesh shows significantly improved mapping of the smodel geometry Run the study. Plot stress results. We nov observe that the maximum von Mises stress increased from 35.1 MPato 39.1 MPa, which is above the material yield strength of the 27.5 MPa, This translates toa difference of nearly 11%. However, if we ‘examine the plot, we will see that the maximum stress is atthe sharp ‘comer of the bolt holes. We will discuss this further in the next lesson. Probe stress on the fillet Using the identical procedure deseribed in step 14 probe the stress results on the flleted geometries ‘We ean observe the maximum von Mises stress on these entities «dropped from 31.4 MPa to 30.8 MPa, which is slightly above the yield strength, This represents a difference of about 2% whieh may or may not be acceptable depending on the design eriteria It should be noted that in other situations the difference in the stress results may be Significant. In general, requirements on the zood stress results| translates into a necessity to generate finer meshes. In our present case Further refinement does not produce further improvement in the stress results and we will thus conclude that they are converged‘SolidWorks 2011 18 Plot displacement results. ‘The above plot shows that the maximum displacement resultant increased from 0.0678 mm to 0.0683 mm; a difference of less than I %. Inthis exercise, we practiced the basi setup ofthe linear static study as Well asthe post processing features available in Solid Works Simulation. We observed that the mesh quality has a significant impact ‘on the results (especially the stress results). While the deviation in the ‘resultant displacements obtained from the two studies was 1 %, the deviation for maximum von Mises stresses was nearly 11 % (often the difference in stresses is much greater). The greater difference in the ‘maximum stresses is atributed to the following two phenomena: ‘= Displacements are the primary unknown in the finite element, analysis and, as such, will always be significantly more accurate than strains and stresses. A relatively coarse mesh is sufficient for satisfactory displacement results, while significantly finer mesh is, generally requited for satisfactory stress results '= The extreme values of the stresses occur inthe vicinity ofthe fixture where the stresses often assume unrealistically high values. This isa subject studied in the next lesson. The stresses atthe filleted rogions reported in both studies were closer in their ‘magnitudes witha relative difference of only 2%, Finer meshes are ‘required in filleted regions as stress results are of importance tous,SolidWorks 2011 Exercise 2: Compressive Spring Stiffness Procedure Note Compressive Spring Sess In this exercise, we will use Solid Works Simulation to determine the compressive siffness of a col spring This exercise reinforces the following skills: = New Stud on page 31 fe Fixtures on page 34. = External Loads on page 38 = Meshing on page 4. f= Result Plots on page 47. “The stiffness ofthe helical spring ean be determined as follows: Open a part file. (Open spring from Lesson01\ Exercises folder, For convenient application of fixtures and external loads, disks have ‘been added to both ends of the spring. The distance between the disks corresponds tothe active length of the un-compressed spring ‘Set SolidWorks Simulation options. Set the system of Units to SH (MKS) and the units of Length and Stross to mm and Nim? (Pa). Create study. (Create a Static study named spring stiffness. Review material properties. The material properties (Alloy Ste Apply Fixed restraint. Apply a Fixed Geometry fixture to the end face of one disk (item 1). 3) are transferred from Solid Works. a7 Apply compressive forcs Soliaworks 2011 6 Apply radial restraint. Use an advanced fixture to apply arestraintin ye the radial dieetion tothe eylindrieal face of the r= a, other disk (item 2), pial = ‘This restraint only allows the spring to bea . compressed (or expanded) in its axial direction and to rotate about the longitudinal axis. — [ous ee (Do snecen ; = Apply 2.0.1 N compressive force o the end face ofthe disk with the cylindrical face constrained inthe radial direction. 8 Mesh the model and run the analysis. Use High quality elements with the default Maximum element size and Minimum element size of 2.787 mm and 0.857 mm, respectively.Soliaworks 209% Coil Spring Axial Stiffness Exercise? Compressive Srng Sess 8 Plot z displacements, Displacement results indicate an axial displacement of 0.426 mm. The axial displacement is in the 2 direction The axial stiffness of the spring can be ealeulated as 234.7 Nim, (=p) ‘We use this result to define the spring connector in later lessons using the equation f~ kx, where k=234.7 Nim. Alternately, we could use an approximate formula forthe stiffness of a helical spring (Mechanical Vibrations by S, 8. Rao, 1995), + where Substituting our values (x G is the material shear modulus dis the diameter ofthe wiee Dis the mean coil diameter ‘nis the number of active turns 8.75.4 Limm,D = 17 mm, and G 7.9610 Pa) into the above Formula gives an axial stiffness of approximately 230 Nim, This result is very elose to our actual result of 234.7 Nim. 10 Save and Close the file. 8Exercise 3 Problem Description Loading Conditions Goal Soliaworks 2011 In this exercise, you will assess the safety of the waste container handle. ‘This exercise reinforces the following skills: = New Study on page 31 sm Fixtures on page 34, @ External Loads on page 38, = Meshing on page 4. = Result Plo on page 47. Base plates =— ‘The handle is used to attach the hook of the winch when loading the container on the rails of the transporting truck. The entre container is ‘manufactured from AISI 304 steel. The handle is welded (double-sided fillet weld) tothe two square base plates located symmetrically on both sides. The diameter of the handle is 30mm; the thickness of the steel plates is Smm. Apply the most suitable fixtures to simulate the connection between the handle and the steel plates. In the most extreme loading situation, when the container is ; pulled onto the truck rails, thehandle |, is loaded by a 3000 N force inclined | by 15 degrees. The force should be applied onthe circular split face indicated inthe figure above. “The geometry ofthe handle - strueture with the base plats is shown in the figure to the right. Decide whether the design ofthis handle is safe, Pay attention to the ‘most appropriate representation of the fixture. The part for this exercise is located in the Lesson01 Exercises folder.Objectives Lesson 2 Mesh Controls, Stress Concentrations and Boundary Conditions {Upon successful completion ofthis lesson, you will be abe to ‘= Illustrate the diferences betwoen modeling and discretization f= Use Automatic transition option to mesh models. f= Use mesh controls = Describe when the lack oF convergence of FEA results may occur ‘= Understand stress concentrations ‘= Analyze model indifferent SolidWorks contigurations ‘= Run multiple studies in a bateh mode ‘= Extract reaction Forces.SoliaWorks 2011 liesh Conroe, Stress Concentrations and Boundary Conditions Mesh Control Case Study: The L Bracket Project Description Stages in the Process Meshes are rarely uniform in practical problems. It would be very inefficient to uniformly reduce the mesh size ina large model because of a local stress concentration. We would ereate large number of elements in areas of uniform or slowly changing stress resulting i an inerease of computational time that in the end tes ws litle about the model. Using different methods to control the mesh, we ean use a small mesh in areas of rapid changing stress and a large mesh in areas with litle change. In this case study, we will determine the stress in an L bracket, under load. The L bracket presents the problem of stress at sharp comets and the effects of filets and local mesh refinement, ‘The comer of the bracket is rounded by a small fillet. Since the radius of the fillet is small compared tothe overall sizeof the model, it may be suppressed. We will solve the model with and without fille, discuss the differences and the applicability of each approach, ‘We will also investigate the eflect of different mesh sizes on the ‘maximum displacement and stress results. Rather than refining the ‘mesh uniformly in the entire model, whieh is called global mesh refinement, we refine the mesh locally, where high stresses are located, ‘This is called focal mesh refinement ‘An L-shaped steel bracket is fixed atthe top and a 900 N Toad is applied to the lower end face. We will evaluate the displacements and sresses inthe model Some key stages in the analysis of this part are shown in the following lis: = No fillet The fillet will be suppressed to simplify the geometry and to ‘observe the sttess atthe sharp comer. = Add filet The fillet will be unsuppressed to determine the effect of the fillet ‘on the maximum stress inthis par.SoliWorks 2011 Procedure Lesson 2 Moen Control, Suess Concenatons and Bundy = Mesh rofinement ‘As the fillet is small compared tothe rest of the model, we will use different techniques to reduce the mesh size only inthe area of the fillet. Inthe first part ofthis ease study, we will examine the stress on this part without the fillet Open a part file. Sena Open 1 bracket.from Lesson02\Case ae arr Studies folder. Rome In the SolidWorks Configuration anager, ‘examine the two configurations: fillet and no fillet. Make the no filet configuration active Set the simulation options. ==—————— Glick Options from the Simulation | 20 menu, Select the Defautt Options ab. | Su Select Unit, then select MKS) forthe |g Unit system, Select mm forLengthl | ronan Displacement and Nim*2 (Pascals) for | smurvasy ae Select Color Chart. For Number format, select Scientific (e) and 6 decimal places. Define static study. Create a new study named mesh. In the analysis Type lis, select Static. Click 0K. Examine the Simulation Study tree. The L bracket icon already has a check mark next to the assigned material because the material definition (AISI 304 steel) has heen transferred from SolidWorks. Also, note that a sharp reentrant ‘comer takes the place ofthe suppressed fillet. ame oftheLesson 2 ‘SolidWorks 2011 IitshConeols, Sess Concentration ae Boundary Conditions 5 Apply a fixture. Now apply a Fixed Geometry fixture to the top face ofthe L bracket. Right-click Pietunes and select Fixed Geometry. Inthe Standard list sclect Fixed Geometry. Click OK. 6 Apply an external load. Right-click External Loads and select Force. Select Force. ‘We want to apply a shearing force and not a normal force, so we must define the direction ofthe force. Select Selected direction, Sclect the indicated face to apply the foree and the Top plane to specify the direction. ‘Type 900 N [202.33 Ib] forthe fore. Select Reverse direction to make sure the force is pointing as shown, Click 0K.Run All Studies Where to Find it Lesson 2 Mesh Gontols, Suess Concenvatons and Boundory ‘Mesh the model. Verily thet the meshing option is sotto High quality (Draft Quality Mesh is cleared), meaning that second order elements are created, Mesh the model using the default Maximum element size and Minimum element size of 4.812 mm [0.1894 in}. Multiple studies ean be run atthe same time. This allows you to setup multiple studies and chen run them after hours. = Select the tab Simulation on the ‘CommandManager and click the down arrow under. Run and click Run All Studies. et ee Blame Create a duplicate study. Study mest is now ready to be analyzed. However, we will create ‘ovo more studies and run al three studies atthe same time using the Run All Studies command, Duplicate study mesh into a new study meshe (see see Creating New Studies on page 61 on how to duplicate a study). ‘When creating the duplicate of the study ‘make sure that the Configuration to use ield says no fillet. Click OK,Lesson 2 Soliaworks 2011 [Neth Coneote, Sess Concentrations and Boundary Conions Analysis with Local Mesh Refinement ‘Mesh Control Where to Find It Mesh Controls The second part of this ease study will investigate the effect of using smaller elements in the model on the results, In Lesson 1, we refined the mesh uniformly throughout the entire model by controlling the global element vess In this part ofthe case study, we will use a differen technique. Note that a stress ‘concentration is located near the sharp re- entrant comer Knowing the location of igh stress, we ean refine the mesh locally in that area by applying local mesh controls, Mesh controls allow you to control the Maximum element size and Ratio locally on selected entities independent of the global Maximum ‘element size and Ratio. As compared to global mesh refinement, this isa more numerically efficient technique. Small elements are placed \where needed, while portions of the model with no sttess concentration are meshed with larger elements. ‘a Right-click Mesh in the Simulation Study tree and select Apply Mesh Control Mesh controls can also be applied to vertices, faces, or entre ‘components of assemblies. Once mesh controls have been defined, the ‘Mesh icon becomes a folder. ‘Mesh controls can be edited using a shortcut $n ‘menu displayed by right-clicking Control-1 and select Edit Definition in the Mesh folder, or directly by double-clicking on the Control-1 item, ‘The mesh, with applied control (also called mesh bia), features localized refinement along the edges Meshing must be dane after controls are defined, Mesh control symbols are displayed slong the affected edge. Mosh Cont SymiosSoliaworks 011 Lesson 2 Mesh Control, tess Concentrations and unary Mesh control “Mesh conteol symbols can be displayed or hidden by: aed = Right-click Mesh and scleot Hide All Control Symbols 14 Right-click Mesh and select Show All Control Symbols The visibility of mesh control symbols can also be controlled individually for each mesh control 9 Apply local mesh control for study mesh. Select the edge shown, Right-click Mesh and select ‘Apply Mesh Control. a Use the suggested focal Element size of 2.406 mm and the Ratio of 1.8 Click OK to close Mesh controls PropertyManaer 10 Create mosh. Create High quality mesh with the default settings. 11 Examine the mesh, Note that smaller elements have been ereated along the edge where ‘mesh control as been just applied. ‘in edge mesh cota! No edge mesh cata 412 Duplicate study mesh2. Name the new study mesh.Lesson 2 SoliaWorks 201% FieanConvols, Sess Concentration and Boundary Conaions 13 Apply local mesh control for study meshs. Inthe mesh study, edit the definition of Control. In the Element size box, enter 0.508 mm to locally refine the mesh along the sharp re-entrant edge. Keep the Ratio at its default value of 15. With this mesh control, we will ereate very small elements along the sharp re-entrant edge, Click OK. 14 Mesh study meshs. ‘Mesh study mesh& with High quality elements and the default mesh parameter. Use the curvature based mesh, We now have three studies: mesh1, mesh® and mesh. The only difference is mesh refinement along the sharp re-entrant edge. ssusy- mesh] 45 Run all studi Select the Simulation tab on the Command Manager. Select the down arrow under Run Study to yout the other choices. Click Run All Studies. 16 Simulation progress log. ‘Once the analyses are completed, review the report in the MSG file locate in the result folder. ae it, ae 417 Plot von Mises stresses. Display the mesh withthe plot by right-clicking the corresponding result plot and selecting Settings. Under Boundary options, select MeshSoliaworks 2011 Click OK. Mesh Control, Stes Concentrations and Boundary ssLesson 2 ‘iesh Convols, Sess Concntatons and Boundary Condens 18 Plot resultant displacements. ‘Suey: mesh o ‘Seay mesh? ‘Suey: mesh3 = SolidWorks 2011SolidWorks 2011 Results Results ‘Comparison Stress Singularitios Lesson 2 Mesh Contoe Stress Concentrations and Bunda Reporting displacement results with six digits oFaccuracy is excessive as uncertainties in loads, restraints, and material properties definition ddo not normally justify this level of aceuraey We used six digits of accuracy so that we can compare the minute differences in the displacement results calculated inthe three studies swe undertook inthis lesson. Results for the maximum resultant displacement and maximum von Mises stress from mesh, mesh? and mesh3 studies are summarized in the following table: Toews | Max von] inoreaein siuay | Mciol | pscaph | Mises) Yon Mies Immit%1 | ipa wmesn | oan |= cae O08 ma mesh2 | 0.28795 (0.2%) (45.5%) doors | gy | mesh3 | 0.28856 (0.4%) ea (192.0%) ach mesh refinement results in an increase in both the maximum slisplacement and the maximum stress. The inerease in the acement results is negligible and becomes less pronounced with we continue this exercise of progressive mesh refinement, either locally near the sharp reentrant comer as we did by means of the local mesh controls, or globally by reducing the global element size as we did in Lesson 1, we would note that the displacement results converge 10 finite value and that even the first mesh is adequate if we are ‘examining only displacement results, Stresses, however, behave quite differently. Fach subsequent mesh refinement produces higher stress results. Instead of converging to a finite value like the displacement results, the stress results divergeLesson 2 SolidWorks 2011 hiesh Control, Suess Concentatons and Boundary Conditions ‘Suppressed Configuration Activate SW Configuration Where to Find It Mesh Number With enough time and patience, we can produce results that show any stress magnitude, All that is necessary isto make the clement size small enough! The reason for divergent stress results isnot thatthe finite element ‘model is incorrect, but that the finite element model is based on the ‘wrong mathematical model According to the theory of elasticity, stress in the sharp re-enteant ‘comer is infinite; a mathematician would say that stress there is singular. The finite element model does not produce infinite stress results due to discretization errors, and these diseretizaton errors mask the modeling error However, sress results in the vicinity of the re-entrant comer are ‘completely dependent on mesh size; therefore, they are totally ‘meaningless at ths location, our objective isto determine the maximum stress at this location, then the decision to suppress the fillet and analyze a model with a sharp re-entrant comer isa very serious mistake, The stress in a sharp re- entrant comer is singular, or infinite. The fillet, no matter how small it is, must be included in the model if we seek to Find accurate stresses in (oF near that fillet ‘When the active configuration is different from the configuration used to create the stud, the study is suppressed an all items inthe study are shown in grey. To unsuppress the study, the configuration must be ‘changed to that used todo the study. “To change the Solid Works configuration to the one used for a study, we ‘can activate the configuration from the Simulation Study tee, 1= Right-click the study in the Simulation Study tree and click ‘Activate SW Configuration.SolicWorks 2011 Case Study: Analysis of Bracket with a Fillet ‘Now that we understand the problem caused by the sharp re-entrant ‘comer, we must repeat this analysis using a model with the fillet, (Obsaining the correct model requires unsuppressing the fillet, Change SolidWorks configuration. ne Inthe SolidWorks ConfiguratonManager, make “reas gar ob the configuration let active, flor Examine the Simulation Study tree. With the fillet configuration active, the mesh1L, mesh? andmesh3 studies are greyed-out. You can aceess them again only ater activating the SolidWorks configuration corresponding to these studies. Create new study, Create a study mesh4 by duplicating the mesh study. We copied the mesh study and not the mesh® or mesh studies for ceonvenience because mesh does not have mesh controls defined and mesh4 docs not require mesh controls. we use mesh2 or mesh, we have to editor delete the mesh controls in the mesh study because the geometry of the model has changed, Mesh the model. c= ‘Mesh the model with High quality elements and vx. the Maximum element size and Minimum sway 21 element size of 4.813 mm [0.1895 in}. & 7 Ae 3 a soem orLesson 2 Sallaiorks 2011 5 Runthe analysis, 6 Plot Displacement results. ‘The maximum resultant displacement result (0.2845 mm) reported for the fillet study differs only insignificantly from the earlier displacement results. This small difference ean be atrbuted to the change in the model geometry. t The stress results obtained by the model with the fillet indicate that the ‘maximum von Mises stress is atthe 8.76 MPa, 7. Plot von Mises stresses. et location and its magnitude is‘SovidWorks 2011 Lesson 2 esn contol, Stes Concentrations an Boundary 8 Analyze the plots. ‘Analyzing the stress distribution uniformity atthe fillet lo rather spotty behavior and no symmetry. Ths is another si ‘insufficient mesh resolution for stresses. The displacement results are ‘accurate in all studies solved inthis lesson. We will therefore apply a new local mesh control on fille and rerun the study again 9. Apply mesh control on filet. To get more accurate results, we will apply a local mesh control on the filet face, Apply mesh controls to the fillet face using 0.762 mm [0.030 in} for the local Element size, 1.2 for the Ratio. 10 Re-mesh model. ‘Mesh the model with High quality elements and the Maximum element size and Minimum element size of 4.813 mm {0.1895 in}, The resulting mesh ean be seen at right. This mesh isa litle excessive in its size, but given the smal sizeof the problem we can afford it. 11 Run the study.Soliaworks 2011 12 Plot von Mises stress. We observe that the maximum stress increased to 102 MPa, The details ‘of the stress distribution are uniform and symmetrical. We could conclude that this stress value is accurate 18 Extract reaction force. Right-click on the Results folder and select List Result Force, Select the face where the bracket is supported and lick Update. Make sure the units are set to $1 ‘The Reaction force (N) dialog will ist the resultant of the reaction on the selected face (or faces, if more supported faces exist and are selected) as well as on the entire model We can see thatthe equilibrium is satisfied; the reaction force is equal {0 900 N, which confirms the equilibrium and the correctness of the solution.‘SolidWorks 2011 Note Case Study: Analysis of a Welded Bracket Lesson 2 Mech Control, Sess Concentrations and Boundary . <= ‘Moment reactions are not reported since solid elements feature three translational degrees of freedom only. Nodes ofthe solid elements do not earry any moment, [Now that we understand the stress concentration inthe fille, let's repeat the analysis using a more realistic model where the edges of the faces are fied rather than the entire face, This would more closely represent the face being welded toa plate 1. Create a new study. Create a statie study named mesh6 by duplicating the study mesh4, 2. Edit the Fixture. Fait the fixture and remove the top face ‘Ad the four edges surrounding that face as shown, This type of restraint would simulate the part being welded to a surface when only the edges are firmly attached to the strueture, and not the entre face 3 Run the analysis.Lesson 2 Solaworks 2011 [Mesh Convo, stress Concentatons and Boundary Condvons Understanding the Effect of Boundary Conditions 4. Plot the stress results. Another stress concentration has appeared atthe edges where fixed geometry was used. Again, a singularity of stress is formed due to the fixed geometry at the sharp end. Although perhaps a more realistic finite element model, the tress concentration is an artifact of the ‘mathematical model ‘These types of effects must be understood to properly analyze model results (= 5. Save and Close the file. Boundary conditions are necessary in order to fix the model in space and solve the mathematical problem. [areal ife every part is connected to another and finally attached to the primary structure or the ground. We can, however, view the boundary conditions as a means to significantly simplify our simulation. As an illustration consider the bracket assembly shown in the igure to the right, where the bracket is part of a larger structure‘SolidWorks 2011 Conclusion Lesson 2 “Then, before we even begin modeling in SolidWorks Simulation we have to decide whether to modol tho entre upper level assembly with the boundary conditions applied as shown in the igure above, othe full bracket only, ora part of the bracket (a model identical to what we had in Lesson 2), See the images below. ‘The decision is based on what isthe objective ofthe analysis, ie. what results do we truly need. The larger the model we chose, the more realistic it becomes. At the same time the size ofthe finite element ‘model increases, resulting insignificantly longer solution times. Boundary conditions therefore serve to express the fact how a specific part or sub-assembly is grounded or attached t0 another primary Structure, and help us substantially reduce the size ofthe problem. Reduction ofthe problem comes ata cos, i. the stress result at the Tocation ofthe boundary conditions may be singular and have to be ignored in such cases, |Also, we need to understand that the boundary conditions do effect our solution, fn the three cases listed above the final results will be ‘comparable, but not exactly the same. Therefore the selection, as well as the location, ofthe boundary condition must be dane so that its effect, fn the results andthe rest ofthe mode! is minimal. The question may arise: which one study isthe correct one? The second to last study withthe fillet and fixed face included inthe rigdel and the mesh control applied produce the most aceurate results| and is favored provided one can afford the increased size ofthe model {due tothe additional regions that must be meshed. Then what about the other studies wher 03Lesson 2 SolisWorks 2011, teh Convols, Sess Concntaons and Boundary Contons Summary Questions 108 These results are obtained by using the incorrect mathematical model. It does not make sense to debate which of the first three models produces the most accurate results and, therefore, which one was “ihe best” among the three. All models with sharp re-entrant edges or edges that are fixed are equally poor if we examine the stress on those edges. ‘Thus, if we are interested in stress at or near a sharp edge (or a sharp ‘comer for shell models), this edge must be modeled with a fillet, even ifthe fillet is very small. In addition, ifthe edge of the model is fixed, ‘we must realize that the appearance of the stress concentration is artificial. In general, ifstesses at these singularities are of no interest, these studies still produce good results for the overall model. In this lesson, we illustrated what can go wrong when FEA is based on an incorrectly prepared model. Using local mesh controls rather than the global mesh controls, we ‘obiained solutions for diferent meshes and revealed stress singularities ata sharp re-entrant commer and at fixed geometries, ‘We used tis lesson to futher discuss modeling and diseretization error, ‘meshing techniques, and also to illustrate the integration between Solid Works and Solid Works Study tre. ‘= Why do we often eliminate filets and small rounds if such suppression can lead to locally inaccurate stress results? Does it imply that the stress results are inaceurate forthe whole model? = Are displacements affected by the suppression of small features (fillets, rounds) as much as stresses? Why?SolidWorks 2011 Exercise 4: C-bracket Problem Statement Part 4: Analysis of Bracket with no Fillet Exercise 4 In this exercise, you will analyze a bracket with two different configurations to determine the effets of the intemal fillets This ercise reinforces the following skills: = Mesh Controls on page 90. '& Results Comparison on page 95. ‘= Siress Singularities on page 95. ‘© Suppressed Configuration on page 96. A hanging bracket mounted on the ceiling will be supporting a sign mounted on the bottom =- ange ofthe bracket. The sign will be mounted ‘one the bracket with a flat ribbon like cable. A ‘900 N [202 Ih, Force will be exerted on the bracket due tothe weight ofthe sign and ribbon. We will evaluate the displacements and slresses forthe bracket due to this loading. We Aare also interested in how modeling the bracket ‘with and without filets will effect our results. ‘The effects of different boundary conditions will also be investigated Open a part file. ‘Open bracket from Lesson02\Exereises folder Specify active configuration. Make the configuration No Fillet active A a Notice that the rounded inside edges become sharp re-entrant comers. This configuration, = suppresses all inner filets Define a static study. Create a Static study named no filet 1 Apply material properties. Apply the material Alloy Steel Irom the solidworks material library -Clckat* SolidWorks 2014 Apply a fixture. Apply a Fixed Geometry fixture tothe top face as indicated. ‘We will assume thatthe compressive force of the serew is large enough to prevent any sliding or rotation about the sew Apply force. Apply a 900 N (202 Ib] normal force to the top face ofthe bottom flange. This force is due to the weight ofthe sign. ‘Mesh the model. ‘Mesh the model withthe default element size, Use High quality elements Run the analysis, Plot stress results ‘We find that the bracket has a maximum von Mises stress of 132 MPa [19.2 ksi] and does not yield. However, there isa high stress ‘concentration atthe sharp comers. | ime i=SoliaWorks 2011 Exercised 410 Plot displacement result. Maximum displacement is 1.25 ia, NO 11 Create a new study. Duplicate the existing study and name it no filet 12 Apply mesh control Apply mesh control to each of the three edges on the inner faces ofthe bracket. Use the default mesh contol siz. 413 Mesh the model Mesh the model with the default clement size. We have ereated a finer mesh atthe inside edges of the bracket, while the mesh sizes are coarser tall other locations inthe bracket 414 Run the analysis.Exercise 4 18 16 7 18 408 ‘SolidWorks 2011 Plot stress results. The maximum von Mises stress is now 160 MPa [232 ksi], which is higher than the von Mises stress value obtained in the previous study with no mesh control. This shows the diverging stress results and verifies that the stress inthe corners are indeed concentrations, Further refinement will continue this tend. =a] Create a new study. Duplicate the no fillet 1 study and name it no Alet 8. Apply mesh control ‘Add mesh control tothe same three edges. Change the local Element ‘ize to 0.889 mm [0.035 in}, Mesh the model. Mesh the model with the default element size. We have ereated a finer ‘mesh at the inside edges ofthe bracket, while the mesh sizes are coarser tall other locations in the bracketSoliaworks 2011 Part 2: Analysis of Bracket with Fillet rorciso 4 419 Run the analysis, 20 Plot stress results. We find thatthe maximum von Mises tress is significantly higher than the value obtained in the previous study with a coarser mesh contol ‘We sce that, although we are refining the mesh, the stress results are not ‘converging. This is due to the sharp re ntrant corner. We will now look at a model with fillets and analyze its solution Change configuration. Change the active configuration o Default. This configuration has the fillets unsuppressed ~ Create a new study. Duplicate the no fillet 1 study and name it filet. Mesh the model. ‘Mesh the model withthe default local Element ™ 109Enrcsa 4 Part 3: Analysis of Bracket with Fillet and Fixed Hole 110 SoliaWorks 2011 4. Run the analysis, 5 Plot stress results ‘The stress results obtained from the model with the fillet indicate that the maximum von Mises stress is approximately 127 MPa (18.4 ksi) Because no sharp edges are present in the model, this val is close to the real stress magnitudes. Further mesh refinement would improve the results and eliminate the spotty stress distribution, In this lst study, we will change the way the partis restrained by editing the one fixture and holding the part by the cylindrical hole instead ofthe entre top face, 1) Create a new study. Duplicate the filet study and name it Allet fixed hole. 2 Use Fixed Geometry on hole. Edit the fixture and remove the top face. Ada the hoe face.SolidWorks 2011 ‘Apply mesh control ‘Apply a mesh control with an Element ‘size of 0.508 mm to the inner eylindrical surface ofthe hole Mesh control on the fillets. Apply a mesh control with the default Element size of 1.9 mm to the thre fillets, Run the analysis. The study will mesh and solve,Brace 4 12 SoliWorks 2014 6 Plot the stress results The stress results obtained from the model withthe fillet and the fixed ‘zcometry on the hole produce a stress concentration around the edges ‘of the hole, This is because 2 singularity of stress appears in this region due to the perfectly rigid support at those edges. This is similar to the singularity sen inthe fixed edges ofthe L-Bracket in Lesson 2 and can be ignored. Change the scale ofthe legend o obtain a more realistic plot ‘We can see thatthe stresses on the filleted faces inereased from 127 MPa (see previous study) to nearly 145 MPa, 7 Modify the mesh controls. ‘Change the Element Size for both mesh controls to 0.1mm for the hole and 1.1mm forthe fillets ven one 8 Run the Study. ‘The study willSoliaworks 2011, Exercised 9 Examine the stress plot. ‘As can be seen the sires near the support increased considerably and represents the maximum stress in the model. From Lesson 2 we know that ths stress is unreal and will inerease as we reduce the size of the elements. oi ~ | i el Probing on selected entities reveals the maximum stress on the filleted faces as 150 MPa, a slight increase from the 145 MPa obtained from the previous run, This stress is real and approaching a finite value (we say it converges). 410 Save and Close the file.Exarcae § Exercise 5: Bone Wrench Problem ‘Statement Note "4 Solidworks 2011 In this exercise a bone wrench will be analyzed for its stresses and deformations when subjected to loads resulting from regular working conditions, The analysis will include a report generated automatically This exercise reinforces the following skills: Plot Settings on page 29. sm Results Summary on page 65. One side ofthe wrench is fixed, simulating a tight contact with a rut, The other side is subjected to ‘horizontal 150.N force exerted bby an operator when tightening (loosening) the nut Open a part file. ‘Open bonewrench from the Lesson02\Bxereises folder Set SolidWorks Simulation options. Set the Units to SHMKS), and the units of Length and Stress to mm and Nimm42, respectively Define a static study. Create a Statie study named bone wrench analysis. ‘Apply material properties. Assign Alloy Stee! as the material from the solidworks materials library Apply fixtures. The tight contact between the wrench and the nut will be simulated by the application of Fixed Geometry fixture on the faces (a total of eight faces), as shown inthe figure. Restrained faces are featured in beige color in the SolidWorks modelSoliaworks 2011 Apply force. Apply force of 150 N [33.7 1b] excite by at operat, ao how i the igure below Mesh the model. Mesh the mode! sit Run the analysis, usNote Note Soliaworks 2011 9 Plot stress results We observe that the resulting von Mises stress in the model is 44 MPa [35.4 Ksi], which is well below the material yield strength of the 620 MPa [89.9 Ksi} 410 Plot resultant displacements. ‘The absolute values ofthe displacements are very small, with a maximum value of 0.3 mm, = = “The next task, extraction ofthe reaction torque requires specification ‘of the local cylindrical coordinates system. Ths is explained in Lesson 4 114. Check the reaction moment. EF ae. Right-click on Results folder and select List Result Force. ‘As shown in the following figure, in the Plane, Axis or Coordinate system ficld, select Axis! SolidWorks Simulation will switch to the eylindrical eaordinate system defined by Axcis]. Select all the faces where the model is restrained (a total of 8 faces), Click Update. ‘The Reaction force (N) dial sads Sum ¥: 1392.3 N. ‘This force could be negative or postive depending on which side ofthe ‘wrench the Force was applied,Soliaworks 2011, Exercise 5 This isthe total value ofthe reaction force in the second cylindrical sation moment, We have to samferential) direction. To obtain a ultiply this value by a radius, 42 Compute the moment. Because the opening is not cireular, we will measure the o inner diameters and use the average as an approximation of the opening diameter The average diameter is Therefore, the total reaction moment is approximately equal 1 To calculate the loading moment, measure the distance betwee centroid of the applied load and Azxis.Exercise 5 Soliaworks 2011 ‘The measured distance is 75 mm. Therefor, the loading moment is {equal to 75180 = 11250Nmim, which confirms the equilibrium, Note ‘The slight difference in the two values isnot caused by the inaccuracy ‘of SolidWorks Simulation computations. Its merely a consequence of the approximate calculation ofthe average diameter of 16.16 me. 13 Generate report. 14 Save and Close the file. 418Sotieworks 2011 Exercise Foundation Bracket Problem Statement Note Exercise 6 The foundation bracket i used to secure a table leg tothe floor In this exercise the foundation bracket will be ~ analyzed for its stresses and deformations when subjected to loads resulting from regular working conditions This exe ines th allo sil ty = Mesh Controls on page 99. 7 = Siress Singularities on page 95. ‘= Results Comparison om pas Mode! courtesy of (One side of the foundation bracket is bolted 10 the loor by a single bolt, The vertical face is bolted toa table leg with two bolts. Analyze the stress inthe Foundation bracket ‘when the table legis forced to displace by (05 mm in both the plus and minus X direction. Both of these displacements are rather large and would not occur under normal conditions. ‘We will fest analyze the stress when the tle feg moves direction, in the plus X (Open a part file Open bracket from the Lesson02\ Exercises folder ‘Set options. ‘Select Units, then set the Unit system to use SI units, mm for length and displacement and Nim*2 (Pascals) for pressure and stress. Select Color Chart, then set the number format to display Scientific units at 2 decimal places Scleet Specify color for values above yield for vonMises plot. [Leave the color asthe default gray. Select Results, then select Automatic as the Default solver. Create a study. Create a new static study and name it stress analysis xt120 Solos 2011 4 Apply material. Apply the material Chrome Stainless Steet from the SolidWorks ‘material library 5 Add fixtures. ‘We are going to ignore friction along the dteetion ofthe slot and only ‘constrain the surface thatthe bolt head and shank contact to zero, displacement, ‘Add an On Flat Faces fixture to the four faces shown, Set the ‘Translations to vere forthe direction Narmal to Face, Rename the Fixture to Bottom bolt a fp}eomnccmer [leorormSoliaworks 011 Exercise 6 Apply fixtures. Apply an On Flat Faces fixture tothe four faces where the bolt heads contact the vertical plate, Rename this fixture to Top boltsExacgos Soliaworks 2011 7 Apply a displacement. Apply a 0.5 mm normal displacement to the two faces indicated using the On Flat Faces fixture. Select the face shown in blue as the direction, Rename this fixture to Top bolts-2, 8 Mesh the model Mesh using the default element size. 9 Run the study.Solidworks 2011 Exercises 410 Plot the results. The displacement plot ehows « maximum displacement of 0 S mm ‘which was our input 41. Examine the stress plot ‘The stress plot shows high stress atthe lower bolt and a the sharp edge. ‘We can see that there is significant yielding as indicated by the color and the position of th jeld arrow in the color band ‘We see that the part will yield around the areas ofthe bolts, and atthe sharp comer between the back vertical face and the an (V od face 2Exercise 6 SolidWorks 2011 12 Re-mesh, Re-mesh the model with a finer mesh, Move the mesh size slider all the way to the right and mesh, ‘We now have two elements in the thickness direction, Note ‘You will eam later inthe course that atleast wo solid elements, through the thickness are required inthe bent regions to obtain acceptable stress results, 13 Run the study. The choive of Automatic forthe solver should cause the FFEPIus solver to be used. 14 Review the plots. The stress plot shows essentially the same results as with the coarser mesh. We still have yielding around the bolts and the sharp comer. 45 Duplicate the study. Name the new study stress analysis x. 18Soliaworks 2011 Exercise 6 16 Change the direction. Tait the finture Top bolto & to reverse the direction and have the displacement applied tothe two faces on the other side ofthe slot as we want to push, not pull, the material in the negative x direction. ae ie im penne Bova e s @ ol 47 Run, Rum the study with the fine mesh. Note No remeshing is necessary the geometry was not modified as8 19 SolidWorks 2011 Examine the results. The stress on the inside faces looks similar tothe stress found when the movement was in the +X direction, however we ean now see additional yielding on the back face. From these results, we can see that we would need to possibly inerease the thickness ofthe material to avoid yielding. However, we need to remember that we purposely subjected the bracket toa very large displacement, which isnot likely to occur frequently Probe the result. By probing several points in the yielded region on the back face, we can see that the stress is about 200 MPa,SolidWorks 2011 Exercise 6 20 Probe the face. In the Probe Reeulte, » indicated face. Click Update. By sclecting the face, we now have Summary information that show the maximum stress is 230 MPa. 4 the ject On selected entities, then sel 21 Conclusion. Based on the analysis, we might conclude that the bracket is not strong enough inthis configuration. We might consider a change tothe design to avoid yielding, probably by inereasing the material thickness to sustain the applied displacements However, as the displacement applied is very large and occurs exceptionally, and the resulting maximum values of 230 MPa are close to the yield strength of the material, dhs bracket design is appropriate 22 Save and Close the file.SolidWorks 2011Lesson 3 Assembly Analysis with Contacts Objectives Upon successful completion ofthis lesson, you will be able to f= Perform structural anal of simple assemblies. ‘= Apply and define contact conditionsesson 3 Sotiaworks 201 {SSEmDY Anaya wi Contes Contact When we analyze an assembly, we must understand how the Analysis components interact with each other so that our mathematical model correctly computes the stress and deformation where they contact. Different conditions must be considered where the parts ean pull apart or penetrate each other and whether or nt the surices can slide over each other, Case Study: In this lesson, we analyze a simple hand tool. It consists of four Pliers with components: (wo identical arms, a hinge pin, anda piece of lat Global Contact Project Description Stages in the Process 30 stock squeezed by pliers We are not interested in the contact stresses that develop between the arms and the pieee of flat stock. ‘Therefore, we ean simplify the model by suppressing the flat stock and replacing it with the appropriate fixture Calculate the stresses that develop in the arms when a 225 N [50.6 Ibf] “squeezing” force is applied tothe end of each arm, The design strength is st at 138 MPa [20,016 psi], approximately 22% ofthe material yield strength. Some steps in analyzing an assembly = Apply materials ‘Materials can be applied to all components together or individually = Add fixtures Fixtures are added inthe same way they are done in parts to restrain the motion of the modelSotiaWorks 2011 Procedure Applying Materials to Assembii Lesson 3 ‘Assombty Analysis wits Contacts ‘= Apply component contact conditions ‘Component contact conditions dictate how parts or suh-assemblies in contactor close proximity interact in the absence of local overrides, = Apply local contact conditions Local contact conditions override the component contact, = Apply mesh control The mesh ean be refined in reas of stress concentrations or rapidly changing geometry, ‘= Mesh the model = Run the analysis = Analyze the results Determine ifthe results are accurate enough or further refinement of the analysis is needed. ‘To begin this case study (Open an assembly file. (Open pliers from Legson03\Case Studies folder ‘Suppress flat. ‘Suppress the pat flat in the Solid Works FeatureManager design tre Create study. Create a static study named piers. Examine the Simulation Study Tree. tao There is now a Parts Folder wih three components“ 835... because there are three pats inthe assembly 10 be ms = Pars Sm analyze teres go = You can apply the same material all components ofan assembly or to ceach component individually To apply material to the components: ‘= Toapply the same material to all components, right-click Parts and select Apply Material to All ‘= To apply different material to each component, right-click a part and seleet Apply/Edit Materia, aLesson 3 SolidWorks 2011 ‘som Anas win Contes ‘Apply materials to components. Apply Plain Carbon Steel material properties to all components including the Pin. ‘Apply fixed restraints. Define Fixed Geometry fixture on both jaws. ‘The applied restraints simulate the suppressed piece of squeezed flat stock. This condition assumes thatthe flat is not sliding when held by the jaws. ‘Apply force to handles. Apply a 225 N [50.6 Ibf force to both handles. The outer face of each arm has a st split face so thatthe load is only applied to part of the face, In the Force/Torque Property Manager, select Normal ‘Component Contact 12 Whenever we crete a study oftnassemby, anew — unin folder named Conneotions is added to the poy Simulation Stdy tree. We use this folder to define | §hewent om how the assembly components interact wth each fone other, ~ We have defined the fixtures and extemal loads, but we are not yet ready to mesh this assembly. We have to account forthe contact between the two arms, ‘The Component Contact options defines the way components interact ‘with each other. You ean override the component conditions by defining different conditions locally for selected pairs of features, Local contact conditions are discussed later in this lesson,SolidWorks 2011 Component Contact: Options, Lesson 3 ‘Asombly Anatyss wit Contac The available options forthe component contact are: Bonded, Allow penetration and No penetration, These optians are explained inthe following figure and table. Bonded Coniaet low penetration No pension f= Io the Simulation Study tee, rightclick Connections and select ‘Component Contact, '& Select Contact'Gap in the Contact for Components. ‘© Select the Simulation tab in the CommandManager, then select ‘Component Contact from the Connections Advisor pull-down mulation menu and then click Define ‘Component Contact Types ‘Bonded ] This is the default choice, Select this option ‘when all touching faces are bonded and the assembly behaves as one part The only difference between a part and an assembly with bonded parts is that in an assembly we ‘can assign different material properties to individual components ‘Allow penetration | set orn when the assembly isa series of unattached components with no structural connection between them, ‘No penetration | Select this option when touching components fan come apart, but cannot penetrate each other. The coefficient of frietion ean be specified in the component contaet property manager. 10uaa Setar 201 SEEDS ant comes Component Default component cont seingis bonded guns Contact: Default contact etveenal touching faces oetneap Se setting ‘Component Contact: Hierarchy and Conflicts, 1 level assembly. Si Editing default component contact, grag) Global Contact, shows that it is applied to the top level assembly. tis possible to delete and re-lefine the top level assembly contact condition. However, multiple top level component contact conditions would result in a conflict and are not permitted Any additional component contact between parts and subassemblies ‘must not be in conflict and will override the top assembly level ‘component contact. Ifthe conflict is detected a warning message will be displayed. 8 Check for existing interferences. Click Too!s, Interference Detection. In the Options dialog, select Treat coincidence as interference and click Calculate. “Three sets of faces inthe assembly are touching. | | (Cee) ome =I eSSoliaworks 2011 Note Important! Lesson 3 Asset Ansys wit Contacte In the parts ofthis assembly, the manufacturing clearance between the pin and the arms is ignonec. ‘That is why the coincident contact of ‘eylindrcal shape between the pin and the arms was detected, 9 Change top level component contact option. Tm order to allow the relative movement ofthe arms whi deforms under the load, change the default component contact (Global Contact) condition to No Penetration. c the model Expand the Connections folder, edit the Global Contact item and change ito No Penetration Click 0K. 40 Mesh the mode! . “Mesh the assembly with Draft quality elements and the slider all the way to the ight. This should produce the Maximum element size of 4.912mm, Minimum ‘element size of 0.982mm, Number of elements in a circle as 8, and Ratio of 1.6, Meshing must always be performed afer the contact conditions are defined, ‘1 Run the analysis. 42 Switch to exploded view. Switch tothe exploded view. 18Lesson 3 ‘sami Analysis with Contacte 106 18 Plot von Mises stresses, SolidWorks 2011 Display the von Mises stress plot by double-clicking on the Stoess1 plot icon, Nae? j= ‘We want to sce if the von Mises stresses in any portion of the model exceed 138 MPa [20,016 psi), which is our design stress, To determine ‘whether the von Mises stresses exceed the maximum we ean change the plot options 14 Change the plot. While the plot i displayed, right-click Stress and sclect Chart options. Under Display options, select Defined, and then enter the minimum stress as O and the maximum stress as 138,000,000. Click 0K. BoteSoliWorks 2011 Viewing Assembly Results Lesson 2 Assombiy Analyse with Contes 15 Change Plot Settings, Right-click Btrese! and seleet Settings. Under Fringe options, sclect Discrete. Click 0K. Areas with stresses higher than 138 MPa would appear in red Note that an exploded view offers avery convenient way of examining the analysis results of an assembly, whereas, ia normal viewing components may obstruct the view. Another way of reviewing results of an assembly is to hide some assembly components 16 Isolate the arm. Isolate armel>, 17 Define stress plot of one arm. Inthe Simulation Study tre, right- Define Stress Plot. Click OK. ck the Results folder, and select You can also use the existing plot Stress} after hiding an assembly ‘component arm,Lesson 3 Soliaworks 2011, ‘ssombi Analysts with Contacts 18 MaxiMin annotations. In Chart Options, select Show max. annotation and Show min. annotation The maximum stress locations and their magnitudes are indicated for the displayed arm, Conclusion The maximum von Mises stress of approximately 93.0 MPa is produced by normal operation of the pliers when a 225 N force is applied to the handles. This load can be (perhaps with some difficulty) applied by hand and 93.0 MPa can easily be tolerated by the pliers’ material (which has a yield stress of almost 620 MPa). Before concluding that our design is safe, e-meshing the model and looking for stress convergence would be required. Handle Contact We wish to determine the maximum stress that the pliers undergo when. squeezing a 5 mm stock plate, The maximum stress corresponds to the situation where the handles are blocked, 19 Show the hidden arm and pin. 20 Collapse the assembly. 21 Create UY: ¥ displacement plot, ‘To determine the force that brings the ends ofthe two handles together, \we need to create a displacement plot showing the y component ofthe displacements Double-click the Displacement. plot icon to make the plot active. Right-click the Displacement] plot icon and select Edit definition, 438Soliaorks 2011 Required Force Pliers with Local Contact Lesson 3 Assombty nats with Contes Select UY as the Displacement Component, and select mm as the Unita, Under Deformed shap deformation in 1:1 seal. Click OK. 9, Select True seale. This option plots the We see that under the 225 N force, the end of each handle travels, 0.402 mm, Consequently, the distanee between the two ends decre by twice that amount, 0.804 mm, Since the original distance is 15.24 mm, the force magnitude must be increased by a factor of 15.24 mm / 0.804 mm = 18.96 ‘Therefore, the force required to bring both arms in contact is equal 10 18.96 x 225 = 4265 N. This is hased on fundamental assumptions of linear analysis where the structural response is assumed to be proportional to the applied load, ‘We will now load the pliers witha force that significantly exceeds 4265 N to ensure that both arms come in contaet. The appropriate ‘definition of the contact will ensure that the handles can come together, but cannot penetrate each other Create new study. Duplicate the study pliers and name the new study pliers with local contact, Edit force. Edit the force magnitude to 4,500 N. This is an arbitear based on our “rough” estimation of forces that will de two aems together.Solidworks 2011 [Reta Anta win Contacte Local Contact Local Contact Types 40 ‘The top level component contact condition remains the same (No Penetration) as inthe previous study. However, now that the force is considerably larger in order to bring the two arms together, we need to specify a local contact condition that prevents their penetration (No penetration top level assembly component contact applies to initially touching faces only). ‘This local contact a condition has Ineomacterrehy precedence over the ‘component contact, In ‘general, the hierarchy of the contact conditions can be explained by the. peceence pyramid shown in the ncontact Nerareny following figure. Top assembly level contact (one definition is permited only) is overridden by other user defined component conditions. All component contacts are then overridden by local conditions. “The local contact conditions can be defined tgensetame(otee) Syrigheslicing onthe Connections fir fer and scketing Contact Set To seep oe grb a. tee les Inadon to Bonded, No Penetration, nd Allow penetration, thc local conse fextres. "= woman contact ype Virtual walnd Shrink me i ftSolidWorks 2011 Note Lesson 3 ‘Assembly Anlst with Contes ‘The table briefly describes the local contaet condition types. ‘Local Contact Types No Penetration Bonded Shrink fit “The features (both initially touching and separated by a gap) may move away from each other but preserve the physical requirement that they may not penetrate each other. Friction coefficient and initial ‘geometrical offset can be specified in the contact ptions. 1 selected features will become bonded, similarly to the component level contact types. While ‘component bonded contact only applies to touching faces, loeal condition is capable of bonding features separated by a gap. The program creates a shrink ft eondition between the selected faces. The faces may or may not be cylindrical. This condition requires thatthe two parts exhibit a finite volume interference. Allow penetration Virtual wall The direction. Free Features can penetrate into each other, a physical impossibility. You should use this ‘option only when you are absolutely sure thatthe specified loading will not cause the Features to penetrate. This provides a sliding support in a way similar to Roller/Sliing restraint, except that fretion clected pair of features is free to move in any coetficient and wall elasticity can be specified. Each local contact type features various options described at various locations throughout the manual 3. Define contact set. To define a contact zone between the tends of the to handles, we use the ‘wo small split faces on the inside of Se the handles to define a contact pa. Right-click Connections and sel Contact Set. _ 1hesson 3 SoliaWeorks 2011 ‘stombly Analysis with Contacts In the Contact Set PropertyManager, select NO Penetration Click one face to define it asthe Set 4, and then click the other face to define it as Set 2 Click 0K. Note ‘The selection ofthe faces for Set 4 and Set 2 is arbitrary No Penetration The above image shows two properties ofthe two local condition, Local Contact Friction and Gap (clearance). Options tt Friction: Any vl of the fiction coecien is permite. = GAP (clearance): In many applications, two entities eannot come imo full contact due to the manufacturing limitations and the ‘modeling approaches that we use. Ths feature resrits such two entities from coming closer than the initial geometrical offset. For a ‘more detailed explanation, please refer to Lesson 7. No Penetration ‘The No Penetration contact also Features advanced options accessible Local Contac through the simulation study options. These options, generally not Advanced Options required, are discussed in Lesson 7.SoliaWorks 2011 No Penetration Local Contact: Accuracy Introducing: Improve Accuracy {or contacting surfaces Where to Find It No Penetration Local Conta Remarks Lesson 3 ‘Assembly Ants with Contacts ‘The default algorithm for the local contaetis fast and suitable to most contact solutions. However, if contact stresses are of primary ‘importance, o if the areas in contact are large andor the default solution for contact stresses is spotty or discontinuous, Improve accuracy for contacting surfaces feature should be activated Improve accuracy for contacting surfaces feature employs advanced solution algorithm resulting in improved results, While such contact solution is more accurate it may take significantly more time. Inthe study Properties, under the Options tab click the Improve accuracy for contacting surfaces check box. Edges and vertices in local No Penetration eontact condition must be selected in the first field (Set 1), while the second field (Set 2) accepts aces only Because the ftition forces are small and no initial geometrical offset exists inthis case, neither the Friction nor the Gap (clearance) properties will be used, Since the contact stresses are of no interest in this simulation Improve accuracy for contacting surfaces option ‘will ot be utilized Because the contact conditions have changed, the ¢{jestatnaan ‘warning signs indicate that remeshing and re- ffi calculation of the results are necessary. “fons ogee SE Mosh ne model “Mesh the model with High quality elements and the same element size as belore. Run the analys! 160ue 03 Solidworks 2011 ‘Assombly Analysis win Contets us 6 Large/Small displacement. While the study is running, the following message will appear: Excessive displacements were calculated in this model. If your system is properly restrained, consider using the Large Displacement option to improve the accuracy of the calculations. Otherwise, continue with the ourrent settings ‘and review the causes of these displacements Click No to complete the analysis as linear ‘The large displacement dialog box warns us that the lange displacements of some parts in the assembly were detected. The large displacement computations are the subject of Lesson 14. At this point, ‘we will ignore this fact. 7. Plot von Mises stresses. After the analysis is complete, create a von Mises stress plot, with discrete fringes, the mesh showing, and the stresses scaled from 0 to (620 MPa [89,925 psil & LT ‘The region in red indicates the yield the maximum reported von Mises stress is approximately 1,806 MPa, This value is, of course, unrealistic. Yielding ofthe material indicates that a linear analysis is no longer valid and that a nonlinear analysis Would be required,SoliaWorks 2011 Contact Stresses Question: Answer: summary Lesson 3 Assam Anais with Contacts After the handles are blocked, any further inerease in foree magnitude has little effect exeopt for inereasing the contact stresses where the handles touch, Can we analyze the contact stresses inthe eutrent stay? No, the element size in the ———ner contact area is much too large in comparison tothe size of the contact area, This ‘comparison is best seen inside view: ‘The two handles touch only along the edge. For accurate modeling of ‘contact stesses, we need several elements along the length and width of the contaet zone, Save and Close the file. In this lesson we analyzed the simple assembly model of pliers with various eontact conditions. To simplify the geometry the Hat was suppressed and its presence was simutated with the help ofthe fixed ‘geometry fixtures onthe jaws. When the analysis was run, we saw a ‘maximum von Mises stress of 93 MPa. This stress is below our specified design strength of 138 MPa. To be sure of our stress results, a more refined mesh should be run to insure that the stress is converging. [Adkltonally, we saw thatthe maximum displacement produced was (0.402mm, We used this result to change our loading application to investigate what happens ithe load was so large that the handles touch. The contact conditions ean be grouped into two distinct categories component and local, Both categories were introduces and practiced in this lesson, “The local contacts take precedence over all ofthe eomponent conditions, while all user defined component contacts take preceden ‘over the top assembly level component condition (essentially serving as the global contact condition forthe entite assembly) While the ‘component contacts apply co initially touching faces of parts or assemblies, the local conditions may feature gaps and intial separation, Various types (namely Bonded, Allow Penetration, No Penetration, Shrink Fit and Virtual Wall), properties and options ofthe contacts were discussed and practice.Lesson 3 SolidWorks 2011 [esonbly Analyste wih Contets Questions 46 A linearity principle (linear dependence ofthe input and output) was used to scale the magnitudes of the loads in order to close arms of the pliers Finally the limitations of analysis with linear materials were examined and contact stresses were introduced, ‘= Asa review; the available component condition types are: ‘The available local contact condition types are 1 The (component / local) No Penetration condition applies to the intally touching faces only, while the (component local) contact may feature gaps and inital separation ‘= Tosimplify the analysis inthis lesson, the lat was suppressed and Fixed Geometry fixture was applied onthe jaws. Thus, we made an assumption that he stiffness of the ats ‘This assumption can only be made ifthe stiffness of the plate is icant, relative to the stiffness of the rest ofthe assembly. Can you propose a more accurate solution? (Hint: Browse through the available connectors types inthe SolidWorks Simulation Connections folder)SolidWorks 2011 Exercise 7: Two Ring Assembly Project Description Procedure Analyze a simple two ring assembly, in which the outer faces ofthe Fings exert cont pressure on cath other if tensile loading is applied This exercise will show how models with surface contact cont can be set up and analyzed, This exervse reinforces the following skills: = Component Contact: Options on page 133, Viewing Assembly Results on page 137 ‘= No Penetration Local Contact Options on page 142 '& Contact Siresses on page 14. |A.3.5 MPa pressure load is applied to face ofthe plate with the U- bracket. The plate holding the large ring is held fixed. The outer faces ‘of the tings exert contact pressure on each other Press Losing ‘Open the existing assembly from the Exercises folder Open an assembly file. Open PuoRingsAssem iromthe Lesson03\ Exercises folder ‘Set SolidWorks Simulation options. obal system of nits to SI (MKS), units of Length to mm and ‘Stress to Nimm*2 (MPa). Define a static study. Create a Stati study named Pressure Loading, ‘Apply material properties. Inthe SolidWorks Sirmlation study tre, right-click Parts and select Apply Material to All Seleet AISI 1020 from the solidworks material library wr48 Soliaworks 2041 5 Apply fixed restraint. Apply a Fixed Geometry fixture to the back face of TwoRingsPart 6 Constrain TwoRingsPart2 to move in the direction of the load. vee Right-click Fixtures and select Advanced Fixtures. Select Use Reference Geometry. Select Plane to specify the direction ofthe restraint Select the thre cylindrical surfaces to apply ‘boundary condition. Activate the Displacement components Along [Zlawer== plane Dir 2and Normal to plane, and set the |lmomuarae values to 0 mm. Click OK. 7 Apply pressure. Apply a 3.5 MPa pressure normal to the surface of the TwoRingsPart2,Solidworks 2011 Note Exercise? 8 Define contact set. Righ-lick Connectione and select Contact Set Inthe Contact Set PropertyManager, select No Penetration as the desired type of contact Click one face to define it as a Set 1, and then click the other face to define itas Set2. i does not matter which face is selected as Set 1 and Set 2 Click OK, 9 Apply mesh control ‘Apply mesh control to the indicated sur ‘TwoRingsPart2, 4 In the element size box, enter a value of 2 mm, Take all other default mesh control settings 410 Mesh the model ‘Mesh the model withthe default element size. Use. High quality elements, 41 Run the analysis. 12 Plot stress results We see that the maximum stress nthe model is 898 MPa. This is well above the yield strength of 351 MPa. Ifthese truly were the in service loading conditions, the design needs to be re-evaluated material or design should be selectedExercise 7 SolidWorks 2011 Fong Resombiy 19 Plot Displacement Results The maximum displacement in this model is 044mm, 14 Animate isplacement Results. 418 Save and Close the file.Objectives Lesson 4 Symmetrical and Free Self- Equilibrated Assemblies Upon successful completion ofthis lesson, you wil be able to ‘© Understand symmetry Displaying results using a cylindrical coordinate system. Locate problems withthe help ofthe What's Wrong feature Use soft springs and inertial relieF options to eliminate rigid body ‘modes. f# Presenting analysis results using eDrawings.Lesson 4 SolidWorks 2011 Shmmaica and Free Sel EqullratesAzcombles Shrink Parts Case Study: Shrink Fit Project Description ‘Symmetry Stages in the Process 192 When parts are assembled witha shrink fit, intemal forees are developed in the absence of external forces. We will analyze a wheel assembly where the rim is shrunk fit onto the Inu to determine the stresses caused by the shrink fit. A shrink ft causes stress within the parts without extemal forces being. applied to the model. The parts initially have an interference fit The directions of stress strain and deformation are not plotted in Cartesian coordinates, but rather eylindrical coordinates so that we can determine radial, axial and circumferential (hoop) stress and deformation, A rrim with an inside radius of 121 mm [2.382 in. is pressed on a hub with an outside radius of 121.45 mm [2.39 in, Find the following stress results in both components: = von Mises stress 1m Hoop stress = Contact stress We can take advantage of the multiple symmetry ofthis assembly model and analyze 1/2, 114, or even 1/8 of the model ‘To reduce the processing time, we will analyze a 1/8 section of the ‘model, [Note that an axis, Axis1, has been defined in the assembly. We will use it as a reference to produce plots of hoop stresses and contact stresses. Some key stages inthe analysis ofthis part are shown inthe following list = Symmetry Determine ifthe mode! has symmetry that will alow only a portion ‘of the model tobe analyzed, = Defeature Suppress features that will nt have an effect on the analysis. ‘= Stabilize the mode! Eliminate rigid body motion‘SovidWorks 2011 Lesson 4 Symi ond Free Se-Equitoated Assembles = Define contact Reeause the pars have an interference fit, we must define the contact as a shrink it = Plot results With shrink ft analysis, we display the results using eylinds ‘coordinates rather than cartesian coordinates. 1. Open an assembly file. (Open wheel assembly from the Lesson04\Case Studies folder. 2. Activate the configuration. Activate the configuration called FEA. It lunsuppresses the Feature named out 1/8 which is used for symmetry in the model Inaddition, to defeature the model, the round features have been suppressed in both pats, = im rounds = hub ound) round, Defeaturing With this modification to the CAD assembly model, we have departed from the original CAD geometry and are now analyzing geometry specifically ereated for the purpose of analy SSupptession of the rounds has let some sharp re-entrant edges. These are permissible only because we do not intend to examine stresses along these edges or in their vicinity. 3 Set SolidWorks Simulation options. Set the global system of units to SI (MKS), the units of Length to mm tind Stress to Nim*2. 4 Create static study. Create a statie study named shrink fit 5. Review material propertios. ‘Notice that the Parts Folder holds two icons, corresponding to the bub and virn components of the assembly, and thatthe material properties hhave been automatically transferred from Solid Works. Examine each part individually to confirm thatthe hub material is Plain Carbon Steel with a yield stress of 220 MPa [32,000 psi and the rim material is Alloy Steel with a yield stress 620 MPa [90,000 psi 483Lesson 4 SolidWorks 2011 ‘Symmatia and Free SettEqubated Assembles 6 Define symmetry restraints. We use a 1/8 section ofthe wee! assembly, but want valid results for the ‘complete model. Therefore, we need to simulate the remaining 7/8 ofthe assembly model. Applying symmetry boundary conditions to the radial faces created by the eut make the 18 section behave as ifthe wheel was still complete, Apply Symmetry boundary conditions to all the faces that were created by the radial cu ‘Symmetry boundary conditions on both sides of the radial cut ean be ereated in one step. ‘Select faces from both components on both planes ‘of symmetry: four faces on the hub and two faces fon the riz. Right-click Pictures and select Advanced Fixtures. Select Symmetry, Click OK. 454Soliaworks 2011 Rigid Body Mode Lesson 4 Syma and Fee Sal Equitas Assembles With the symmetry restraints applied, the model can still move in the axial direction. Thus, one rigid body made remains unconstrained ‘To eliminate this rigid body motion, it is enough to restrain just one vertex on each of the components (the total of two vertices) in the axial ireotion, Note that each part must be constrained individually because parts can slide in the axial direction, the shrink fit contact is Frctionless. This is actually an artificial restraint simply forthe purpose of removing rigid body motion, which isnot allowed in structural FEA, ‘and causes the solver to terminate Alternatively, we can use the soft spring feature which is specified in the study properties. We will demonstrate this option in the second part (of this lesson, Eliminate rigid body mode in the model. "wee Restrain the model by one vertex on each of the aes tno assembly components, ia, Select one vertex on the Fim and one on the hub me a (any vertex), right-click Flxtures andl select = . ‘Advanced Fixtures, aA om" Select Use reference geometry, —_ Using the fly-out menu, select Axis] as the (plow some Under Translations, specify thatthe displacement T>*"== in the direction along the axis (Axial) is equal 0, |) omar Now the assembly is fully restrained: it has no unconstrained rigid body modes. Any other movement of the assembly must be associated withthe deformationLesson 4 SolidWorks 2011 ‘Symmaal and Free Set Equllbrated Assembles Shrink Fit Contact Condition Note 10 " Because the rim diameter is smaller than the whee! diameter, there is an interference in the Solid Works assembly. Solid Works Simulation
4.9¢-3 x 400/465.92 = 4.2060-3 mm, ‘A point with coordinates of[4.206e-3 mm, 400 N] also lies on the same force to elongation plot Force displacement graphs are common charactersties ofthe chains. ‘The graphs always bezin at a point [0 mm, 0 N] and feature a constant Slope until a point where the material exhibits significant yielding and the force displacement relationship is no longer eonstant. The ultimate strength ofthe chain is then defined a a force causing the chain to break, Save and Close the file. 105seine, Soliaworks 2041Objectives Lesson 5 Assembly Analysis with Connectors Upon successful completion ofthis lesson, you willbe able to Use spring connectors. Use pin connectors Use spot weld connectors. Apply restraints in a local coordinate system, Analyze results in a local coordinate system,‘soidWorks 2011 [Retombly Antat with Connectors Connecting Components Connectors Connector Types. Connector Type Mate definitions in the SolidWorks assembly do not translate into ‘contact definitions in Solid Works Simulation. Therefore, from the point ‘of view of Solid Works Simulation, the components of the assemblies fare un-attached until we define the proper contact conditions or connectors deseribing interactions between the assembly components, ‘We use mathematical connectors instead of actual models ofthe ccannectors to speed the analysis process as the mesh and contacts are reduced and solution can be found more quickly “The main purpose of this lesson isto examine various other connectors available in SolidWorks Simulation. When analyzing assemblies with connectors, we frequently do not need to analyze the connectors itself, only the parts around the connectors Replacing the connector model with SolidWorks Simulation connector speeds the analysis process as there is nothing to mesh and solve. SolidWorks Simulation provides the following types of connectors: = Rigid = Bolt Spring = Link Pin = Spot Welds Elastic support = Bearing ‘The following table lists the available connector options: Definition Defines a rigid link between the selected faces. The connected faces do not deform. “Connects @ face on a component (oF solid body) to face oF a vertex on another component (or solid body) by distributed springs with the specified normal and shear stiffness. The stiffness values may be entered as distributed or total values. The two faces must be either planar and parallel to each other, or cylindrical and coaxial ‘You can specify a pre-load forthe spring connector ‘The following types are available ‘Compression Extension ‘Compression only Extension onlySolidWorks 2011 ‘Connector Type Lessons ‘Assembly Ata with Connectre De Pin Elastic support Bolt Spot weld Edge weld Link Bearing Defines an elastic foundation between the selected faces of a part or Defines a bolt connector between two components or between a | The distance between the two locations remains unchanged during ‘Connects cylindrical faces of two components, The following two ‘options are available in the pin definition |. With retainer ring (No Translation). Specifies a pin that prevents relative axial translation between the two eylindrical faces, With key (No Rotation). Specifies pin that prevents relative rotation between the two eylindrical fac The stiffness values corresponding to the axial and rotational direotions may be specified us well assembly and the ground. The faces do not have tobe planar A distributed stiffness ata point on the face represents the stiffness density associated with an infinitely small area around the point. The tangential and normal stiffness components are assumed constant and direeted in the directions tangential and normal tothe face a every point. Elastie support can be defined for any eurved face. This eonnector ean be found inthe Fixture menu, component and the ground. Bolts both with and without nuts are supported, Material specifications directly from the material libraries and various preload options are available To see the definitions of the bolt connectors see Lesson 7 and Exercise 14; Bolt Connectors on page 269 Defines a connestor simulating spot weld between two solid faces oF to ing edge weld bead hetween two shell Features oF one shell and one solid feature Defines a connector simul Fillet and Groove welds, both single and double sided are available, Ties any two Tocations on the model by a rigid bar that is hinged at both ends delormation Link does not restrict rotations at both ends. jppon through a Simulates the interaetion between a shaft and as bearing 09Lesson 5 Soliaorks 2041 [Ssembi Analysis with Connectors Case Study: ‘The vise grip pliers require the Vise Grip Pliers Project Description Process use of several connectors and various contact sets to be analyzed, Pins and springs will be used to simulate the physical pars and contact sets will be defined between the various parts. ‘The vise grip plies are clamping a piece of bar stock. The plies are set so that they are not inthe locked position, A 225 'N force is applied to the handles, All components are made of Alloy Stel Determine the maximum slress in the assembly and iffany ofthe parts exceeds the yield strength, ‘The following are the major steps inthis analysis = Create an analysis configuration. [Not ll the parts need to be analyzed. Suppress the parts and detail that are not necessary = Apply materials. Either apply the materials in SolidWorks or through SolidWorks Simulation, = Apply fixtures, ‘The model must be restrained to represent the way it is held inthe physical world ‘= Determine contact conditions. Using interference detection, we can determine contact points ‘between the parts. Contact sets are then created to represent these in the analysis problem, = Apply connectors. ‘The actual connectors are not part of the analysis so they will be represented by pin connectors.Soliorks 2011 Procedure Assombiy Anata with Connectors = Apply external forces. ‘Apply the loade that represent a hand squsezing the vise rip pliers = Mosh There are multiple parts and each must mesh with the correct contact conditions to satsly the contact with adjacent parts = Run the analysis. Run the analysis and analyze the results to determine further action, Follow the steps below to analyze the vise grip pliers: Open an assembly file. (Open wrench from the Lesson05\Case Studies folder Change configuration. Make the For analysis configuration active, In this configuration, the release lever and pinoap parts have been suppressed. A simplified configuration of the sorew is also used which removes the small, ‘chamfers and holes as they do not affect the study ‘Set the simulation options. Click Options from the Simulation menu. Select the Default Options. tab, Select Unite, then select $I (MKS) for the Unit system. Select mm for LengthiDisplacament and Nim*2 (Pascals) for Pressure/Stress. Select Color Chart, For Number format, select Scientific (e) and 2 decimal places. Create a study. Create a statie study named vise grip analysis. ‘Apply material ‘Apply the material Cast Carbon Steel from the SolidWorks ‘Materials database to all the part. ‘Simulate bar stock. We are not interested in the stress in the piece ‘of bar stock, soit has been suppressed. To simulate it, add Fixed Geometry fstures co the {80 Mat Faces ofthe jaw. Check interference. To determine where the different components, are in contact, we can use the Solid Works ierference detection. Click Tools, Interference Detection in the menu Select the assembly fle and Treat coincidence as interference, Tree contacts are detected 01Lesson § SoliaWorks 2011 ‘tomb Anas with Connectors 8 Evaluate the contacts. Examine the model to determine the effects ofeach contact. 1 Interferencot is line contact between the sorew and the end of the center link, We will add a contact set for bonded contact between these two components because as long as the force is applied, these two components remain in contac. 1 Interference2 is between the screw and the barrel of Arm where the threads engage, This contact will be handled with a help of the top level assembly component contact (Global Contact) Interference’ is between two different components of Arm} that do not move relative to ane another. This contact will also be handled with a help ofthe top level assembly component contact (Global Contact) Inerfrences Inerterenca Close Interference Detection, Set the top level assembly contact. Confirm that the top level assembly contact (Global Contact) under the Component Contacts folder is set to Bonded.Introducing: Pin Connectors ‘Acsebly Anti wih Connectare 10 Explode. Explode the assembly to make it eas 11 Add Contact. ‘Add a Bonded contact set between the edge of the enter link and the ‘end face ofthe screw. __ = ended Se Pin connectors ensure that two cylindrical faces remain coaxial during the deformation process. The two Faces are not allowed to deform and Will emain cylindrical during deformation, to select the faces and edges. The following options are available with pin connectors ‘© With retainer ring (No translation): It cylindrical faces will not be allowed to translate axially relative each other ed, the two ith key (No rotation): If checked, this option eliminates axial rotation of the two eylindrieal faces relative to each other. f= Include mass: The mass of the pin can be included in frequency analysis o if acceleration loads are applied in state stress analysis, '# Axial and Rotational stiffness: Ifany ofthe two relative displacements are unrestricted (axial translation or rotation), linear stiftess values in those two particular directions ean be specified. 163Sollaworks 2011, ‘Asemby Anti with Connectre Note 104 Ifthe geometrical and material parameters ofthe pin are known, it can be conveniently tested at the end ofthe analysis, The following. parameters are needed: = Tensile stress area: cross chord area ofthe pin Pin strength: Design strength for the material of he pin (typically the yield strength). = Safety Factor: Pin Design Safety Factor Alternatively, pin strength can be populated automatically by specifying the material in the material dialog window Depending on the type of connector used, certain contact conditions have to be defined between connected components (such as No penetration contact between two bolted parts), We will need thre pins to connect the components. PintSoliaWorks 2011 Lesson 5 Assombly Anais with Connectors 42 Add pin: In the Simulation Study tee, rightclick Connections and select Pin, Select the inside face ofthe hole the shat in the seoondGrip part the CenterLink part and the face of Select With retaining ring and clear With key. Click Select material and sclect AIS! 1020 steel. Under Strength Data input 1.2 mm*2 for Tensile Stress Area, 3.51668 Nim*2 for the Pin Strength and 2 for the Safety Factor. Clicks OK. a Tac a fm Ts sj Onsen 413 Add additional pins. Repeat the above procedure to add the two addtional pins same properties, theLesson 5 ‘SolidWorks 2011 ‘esombly Anlst with Conectors Introducing: Spring Connector Spring Connector Types Spring Connector Options Where to Find It 196 ee — ag springs. Bale) | eee oan _| o-— Under Type, we ean specify whather the spring is active : inboth compression and tetson, compression only or MBI] tension only The options Flat parallel faces, Concentric nasnatan ‘cylindrical faces, and Two locations specify the | Ocmaweowoustn characteristics ofthe spring end entities Under Options we ean specify the Normal and Tangential spring stflives values. Both quantities ‘ean be expressed as Total (Nim or Ibjin), or Distributed in the units of (N/m)/m? or (lbviny in’, for example Both the Compression preload and Tension preload can be input. f= Select Fixtures fom the Simulation menu, then select, Connectors. Select Springs from the Type list in the PropertyManager. ‘= Inthe Simulation Study tee, rightclick Connections, and select Spring.SolidWorks 2011 Lesson 5 ‘Asem Ansys wit Connectors 16 Aaa a spring connector While we do not have a spring modeled into the assembly, we will add a connector spring to apply the appropriate force. Right-click Connections and select Spring, Select Two locations. We have split faces on the appropriate Features of each part to ereate vertices ‘on which to connect the spring Type 250 W/m for the Axial Stiffness. Select ‘Tension preload force and type 8 W. ‘87Lesson 5 Soliorks 2011 ‘comb Anata with Connectre 418 Apply external loads. We will have to add two opposing forces, one to the Arma and the other to Arm2. As modeled, each of these components has an appropriate face on which to apply the loads, Apply a 225 N force, normal tothe ‘Top plane to 4. =. Note ‘Make sure that the Force applied to the top handle is 225N as a Total Fore 16 Mesh, Mesh the model using High quality elements and the default settings. th ofthe surfaces 47 Run, Run the study. 198AssembyAnayss wit Connectors 18 Plot the stress. We observe stresses well above the yield strer Te locate the high stress regions more in depth stress post processing analysis is required, 419 Chart Options. We would like fo see if any components yield. We can change the chart ‘options to make the top ofthe scale equal tothe yield stress ofthe Alloy Stee! material. Anything that yields will then be shown in red Right-click the plot Stress and click Chart Option. Select Defined and type the yield sess for Alloy Stel (620,422,000 Pa) as the maximum limit ofthe lezend 20 Examine the plot ‘We can see that the only area at which yield occurs isa the line contact link. All other components are well below yield 199Lesson 5 ‘send Anais with Connectors 21 Isolate the part. Soliaworks 2011 ‘To geta better look at this one part, we will isolate it. Right-click on the center link part and select Isolate, Double-click the plot Stressl to cause the plot to redraw ‘We can see that the problem is the area where we have defined line contact between the center link and the serew. This concentration (stress singularity), ie. unreal distribution of stress ‘was subject of Lesson 2. While itis not possible to eliminate it with the eurrent distribution by reining the mesh. 22 Show all parts Click Exit Isolate to show all the parts smetry, We could minimize its impact om the rest ofthe stress‘SolidWorks 2011 Lesson 5 Assembly Analysis wih Connectors PiniBolt Force The pins and bolts ean be quickly designed, knowing the basic loads scat and axial forces, bending moment, and torque. The Figure below shows the directions of these loads xsl foce Note The x, y, and z.components are reported in the global coordinate system, The sign of the axial fore indicates tensile or compressive force ListPin/Bolt/Bearing The pin, bolt and bearing forces are calculated and displayed in tabular Force Form, The dialog lets you save data asa *esv or *xt file, which ean be ‘opened and edited in Excel or Notepad, Exported information ean be used very effectively for the pinibolt design. Provided the strength data ‘was entered for each pin, the software will analyze each pin automatically. Where to Find It ‘= Inthe Simulation Study wee, right-click the Results folder and click List Pin/BolwBearing Force.‘SolidWorks 2011 23 Extract the pin force. Now that we hve simplified he | * BRT analysis by suppressing the pins, we BS a have to extract the pin forces. genet Right-click on the Results folder 3 scrsgccom and select List Pin/BoluBearing Esme Force. ‘Serapnconan B cmsugpere ‘The Pin/Bolt Force dialog lists all important force loads on pin ‘connectors. ‘We can examine the forces on each pin or the maximum values and ‘which connector they are on. The red background indicates thatthe pin is failing withthe safety factor of 2.SolidWorks 2011 ‘Summary Lesson § ‘Assembly ali with Conners ‘The focus ofthis lesson was to provide a summary ofthe available connector types sun demonstrate dhe use of some of them, In the vise grip model we analyzed an assembly and used spring and pin connectors to simplify the model by eliminating the spring and pin OF course, this approach is acceptable only ifthe spring and pins themselves are of no interest in the analysis. We saw that due to the geometry of the center link, a stress ‘concentration caused untealistic stress results along the sharp edge. To ‘etter investigate this region, we would want to refine the mesh significantly, We could then attempt to compare the stress results to the yield strenght ofthe material We also successflly evaluated the pin connectors nd showed that the pins were failing with respect to our input factor of safety. To remedy this, we would need to either select a new pin material or make the pins larger. Practice problems using additional types of connectors are found in the exercises following this lesson,osson 5 Soliaorks 2011, ‘stent Anta with ConnectorsSolidWorks 2011 Exercise 10: Lift Assembly Problem ‘Statement ‘Analyze a lift assembly, in which @ weight is supported by four arms. This exercise will ntrauce another fixture called a hinge This exercise reinforces the following skills: = Component Contact on page 132. & Local Contact on page 140. '& Rotational and Axial Stiffness on page 254. [A scissor lift used t lift a 1,800 N. weight is operated by an external - hydraulic cylinder connected toa |_ 18097 ~~ | slider traveling om a base vw The load is assumed to be evenly distributed between the two rollers which, in turn, evenly split the load between the arms, This way each arm is loaded with a 450 N. force Find the displacements and stresses in the lift components atthe collapsed position of the lift arms. We are not interested in contact stresses in the in joints, nr the stresses inthe base 1. Open an assembly file. Open lift from Lesson05\Bxercises folder. Familiarize yourself with the collapsed and extended configurations of this assembly. The goal ofthis analysis isto analyze the assembly in the collapsed configuration 2. Activate the configuration collapsed. The weight, hydraulic cylinder, connecting pins, and many other details are not modeled, and the SolidWorks assembly lit depicts the scissor Ti in a somewhat idealized way. he" 3. Set SolidWorks Simulation options. Set the global system of units SH (MKS) and the units of Length and Stress to mm and Pa (Nim*2), respectivelyExercise 10 sendy Note Note 208 Solidworks 2011, Create study. Create a Static study named collapsed-without base Assign material properties. Specily Plain Carbon Steel for all ofthe components Check for assombly interferences. ‘There are only two parts in the assembly with touching faces. Since we are not interested inthe deformations and stresses inthe base, \we will suppress this part to simplily our mesh. At the same time, however, we must correctly represent the contact condition with the ‘corresponding frietion forces. This can be achieved by using a Virtual wall contact condition type, introduced in Lesson 7 Exclude the base part from the analysis, Update all components. Because the base part was suppressed after the study collapsed-without base was defined, we have to update the study ‘components, Right-click on the study collapsed-without base and select Update ‘All Components. Alternatively, you can use Exclude from Analysis command which does not require suppression of the part in SolidWorks.‘Solidworks 2014 Exercise 10 9. Define Virtual wall Specily the bottom face on the slider asa Sat 4 and the hase plane as a Set2. Specily the Friction Coefficient of 0.1. Under Wall Type, Floxible. ‘Specify the values of 1,6537E+013 (Nimyim? [60.9266 Ibin/in?} and 6.2216E+012 (Nimyim? [22.9206 Ibvinlin] as Axial stiffness and Tangential stiffness, respectively Click OK to save the virtual wall setings = > I oe oS orExercise 10 Eiassombly Hinge Restraint Note SolidWorks 2011 ‘The connection between the lift arms and the base has to be simulated as hinges, The Hinge type of restraint suppresses radial and axial translations, ‘which are defined in the local cylindrical coordinate system associated with the eylindrical surface. Exactly the same restraint can be defined using the On Cylindrical Face type of restraint where we restrain the radial and axial displacement components 10 Define hinge restraint. Right-click the Fixtures folder and then seleet Fixed Hinge, Select the two cylindrical faces initially connected to the base Click 0K. Using the Fixed Hinge restraint, we assume that the base i rather sift ‘and does not deform. Ifthe elastic behavior of the base must be accounted for, it would have to be included in the analysis, 11 Define Pin connectors. Define two rigid Pin connectors between the four arms, and two rigid Pin connectors between the arm and slider, Fora the pins, allow the relative rotation and restrain the relative translation between the connected components,Soliworks 2011, Hint Note Exerc cnascenbly 12 Define restraint on slider cylindrical face. Teo nyel the support offered Uy the hydraulic cylinder restrain the cylindrical face on the slider inthe global x-direction (inthe direction of the piston), Utilize Use reference geometry restraint type to define this houndary or condition. By applying restraints to the entre cylindrical face we ignore the realistic distribution of stresses between the cylinder pin and the lug. This modeling simplification is acceptable because we do not intend to investigate the contact stresses inthe lu. The model is now fully constrained even though the assembly ‘components are not touching eaere, Soliaworks 2011 13. Apply 450 N force on link components. Apply a downward force of 450 N to each ofthe four cylindrical ‘openings atthe free ends of the four link components. The total weight distributed equally between all four locations is thus 1,800 N, Bearing Load Applying the load to the entre eylindrical hole isan acceptable simplification because we do not intend to analyze contact stresses developing between the arms and roller pins [Note that there i a more accurate way to apply load to a eylindrical hole that stil does not require contact stress analysis. It is called a Bearing Load. ‘A load defined as a bearing load is applied to a portion of the cylindrical face (this requires splitting the face), and its variation is described by a cosine function to simulate the contact pressure distibution 14 Create mesh, Mesh the model with High quality elements and the default settings. 15 Run the analysis. 210‘SolidWorks 2011 Exercise 10 Unaecenaly 16 Plot von Mises stress and resultant displacement. We aIs the friction force correct? 2 17 List slider lug hole reaction force. “The reaction force in the x-direction, which is the direction of the hydraulic eylinder, is approximately 6,350 N. 18 List contact and friction force List contact and friction forces on the bottom face of the slider, ‘The Normal force (y= ceomponent) is equal to 900 N, which amounts to halfof the total load (the second half is carried by the two hinge restraints). ‘The Friction force (x- component) is equal to 45, N. Can you verify whether the result for the friction foree, 45 N, is correct? Why?Soliaworks 2011 Exercise 10 Unaecenty 419 Analyze deformation of slider. Define a new displacement plot ofthe slider in highly magnified seal (You may hide all ofthe remaining components in SolidWorks to view the deformed shape more eleazly), In the Deformed Shape dialog, un check the Show colors option We can see that the mide part ofthe lider detaches from the base: the contact is provided only by very small areas ‘on both sides, Also note that, t0 accurately model the contact stresses, a highly refined mesh would be required 20 Save and Close the file. a3Exercise 11 Soliaworks 2011 ‘ata wth Base optona) Exercise 11: “The results fom the previous study canbe verified by running the same Analysis with analysis with the base included inthe finite element model. Base (optional) Run the simulation again with the base included in the model and ‘compare the solutions to verify that the virtual wall contact condition accurately models the eal situation, This exercise reinforces the following skills: ‘= Conectors on page 188, = Pin Connectors on page 193. aSolidWorks 2011 Exercise 12: ‘Shock Absorber Problem Statement Procedure Exercise 12 In this exercise, we will analyze a shock absorber, Reils frm Exercise 2: Compressive Spring Sriffness on page 81will be used in the application ofa spring This exercise reinforces the following skills: 1= Spring Connector on page 196, “The miniature shock absorber consists of a tube, a plunger, clamp, and ‘a helical spring. We will investigate the stresses that develop inthe plunger collar when the assembly is compressed with a3 N foree. We have already calculated the stiffness of the spring to be 258.7 Nim in Exercise 2: Compressive Spring Stiffness on page 81, This result will be used to set up a spring connector in this exereise Stresses in the helical spring are not of interest, therefore we will remove the spring from the model and replace it with an equivalent spring connector, Determine the maximum stress on the shock absorber components and the displacement under a3 N load. Follow the steps below: Open an assembly file. Open shook from the Lesson08\xercises folder Suppress the helical spring (pat file Front Spring). ‘Set SolidWorks Simulation options. Set the global system oF units to 81 (MKS) and the units of Length and Stress to mm and Nim*2, respectively Create study. Create a static study named shock assembly. ‘Assign material. ‘Assign Alloy Stee! 10 all the components.Se Bsa Note Note 26 SolidWorks 2011 ‘Apply fixtures. Apply a Fixed Geometry fixture to the cylindrical face ofthe eye belonging to the ‘Shook Tube (item 1), ‘This fixture fully restrains the Shook Tube ‘component Restrain Shock Plunger. Apply an Advanced Fixturo inthe radial and circumferential directions to the cylindrical face ofthe eye (item 2) belonging to the part shock Plunger. Use On cylindrical face as the type of fixture With these three constraints, the assembly model is eft with one degree of rigid body motion. The Shook Plunger can slide in and out of the tube because the Shock Plunger and Shock Tube are disconnected. ‘We connect these two parts with a spring connector. Define spring connector. Right-click Connections and select Spring, Under Type, sclect Compression Extension with Flat parallel faces, As shown, specily the selected face on the Shook Tube as the Planar Face of Component andthe face on the Shock Plunger as the Parallel Face of Component2. Which face is selected as 1 and 2 is not important.‘soidWorks 2011 10 " Exercise 12 Under Options, select Total stiffness and enter aie 7 256.7 Nim in the Normal direction. The Shoal = zi ‘Tube and Shock Plunger are now connected. oon Click 0K. Apply force to shock plunger. Apply a 3N load tothe spit face on the cylindrical face ofthe Shock Plunger ear in the direction of the rod. load is applied normal to Planel. ‘Apply mesh control "Apply mesh control othe fillet face on the Shock Plunger where a higher stress concentration can be expected. Specily a local Element size of 0.5 mm and the default Ratio of 1.8. Mesh the model. Mesh the model with the default settings. Run the analysis. Run the analysis and note thatthe solver issues a warning about large Aisplacements. Click No, The analysis will then completeExercise 12 Large Displacement Warning 20 SolidWorks 2011 In this case, we ignore the warning because the large displacements ‘caused by the spring connector are translations only. The rotations of the assembly components are restricted and the deformations are very small, ‘You may run the solution with and without the Large Displacement ContactiConnector fag activated to verify that both runs produce the same results, Large displacement analysis isa subject of Lesson 14, 12 Plot von Mises stresses, We note that the maximum stresses (of 2.44MPa are well below the yield strength of the Alloy Stee! (©20 MPa), For more accurate stress results, \e could further refine the mesh around the fille, but that is not the ‘main purpose ofthis projet 13 Plot displacements. Pilot the distribution ofthe U2: Z Displacement in the True Scale, We observe the maximum displacement of 11.7 mm, which is in accordance with the linear 14 Save and Close the file,Soliaworks 208% Exercise 13: Spot Welds- Solid Mesh Project Description Exercise 13 Spot Weide Soa ash Atubeis fabricated out of two spot wee sheets of galvanized steel that ae joined by spot welds on each side, We will use FEA to investigate torsional stifiness of the assembly by finding the torque required to twist the tube, e of I that we will use is arbitrary, We are not attempting to duplicate ‘any real life test conditions. We intend to use the results ofthis numerical test to compare dif spot welds configurations. The two-piece design is the first ‘configuration we test. The twist ang Bt welss This exercise reinforces the following skills ‘= Spot weld on page 189. © Cylindrical Coordinate Systems on page Sofi Springs on page 163, 138, The tube is fabricated out of two sheets of galvanized steel 1 mm [0404 in] thick. The two pieces are joined by 10 spot welds on each side. The spot welds are spaced 25.4 mm [1.0 in] apart and the diameter fof each spot weld is 3.175 mm [0.125 in Determine the torque required to Wvist the tube by 1°. 1. Open an assembly file. (Open tube solid located in the Lesson0B\ Exercises folder Examine two configurations complete tube and half tube The assembly consists of wo identical parts, tube 80. Examine part model tube 30 and note a split line added to Tocate the positions of spot SeitUine welds 2. Assembly configuration. Make the configuration complete tube active.Exercise 13 Spot Wess: Soe Mah Introducing: Spot Wolds Where to Find It ‘SolidWorks 2011 3. Sot SolidWorks Simulation Options. Set the system of Units to SI (MKS), the units of Length to mm, and Stress to Nim*2, 4. Create study. Create a study named tube solid. 5. Review Material properties, Verity that the material definition, Galvanized Steel, has been transfered from Solid Works to SolidWorks Simulation © Treat tubes as solids, Expand the Parts folder. Right-click the tube features and select Treat as Solid, Spot welds are defined by the two faces which are connected by the weld. Additionally the weld location needs tobe specified on either one of these two faces. ‘To specify the spot weld location you can use an assembly reference point (not a part reference point) or a verte. ‘= Inthe Simulation Study tee, right-click the Connestions folder and select Spot Welds. ‘= OF, select the arrow under Connections Companion and select Spot Welds. 7. Define Spot Welds. Right-click the Connections folder and select Spot Welds. Select Spot Weld First Face, as shown in the figure Then select the connected face onthe other part (see the figure) as the spot weld second face. Then select Spot Weld Locations and s. the ten vertices shown, In the Spot weld diameter, enter 3.175 mm [0.126 in}, This way, all spot weld locations on one side are defined in a single restraintSoliaworks 2011 Exercise 13 Spot elds Sobd Mesh Click 0K. =, vee Seiet 10 = —s © forse Ofraonen Repeat the process for the other side. Similarly apply spot welds at all the +10 locations on the other side ‘of the tube, aExercise 12 ‘Sporeer Sou ash Apply Torque Solidworks 2011 We are going to apply torque to this assembly using two fixtures. On ‘one end the geometry will be prevented from moving inthe axial and circumferential directions. On the other end, we will apply a fixed movement of I degree. 2 9 Apply fixtures. Select the Use reference geometry fixture under advanced and select the assembly axis as reference geometry. This way, the directions of restraints are aligned with the cylindrical coordinate system defined by this axis. The fist component is radial translation, the second is, circumferential rotation (expressed in radians), and the third is axial translation, Select the two faces on one side ofthe tube and restrain the Circumferential displacement component (enter O rad), Click OK. ae [lm (@) trSoliaworks 2011 Contact Between Parts 10 Prescribe rotation at the other end. “Analogously to the previous condition, apply a 4dag (0.0174 rad) ment tothe two faces on the opposite end loner o F
You might also like
SolidWorks Essentials Ver. 2011
PDF
75% (4)
SolidWorks Essentials Ver. 2011
507 pages
2018 CSWE Training Manual
PDF
No ratings yet
2018 CSWE Training Manual
152 pages
Solidworks Simulation Training Chapter 3
PDF
86% (14)
Solidworks Simulation Training Chapter 3
146 pages
SolidWORKS (FEA) Simulation Theory Manual
PDF
100% (4)
SolidWORKS (FEA) Simulation Theory Manual
115 pages
SWEDU Fund3DCAD SIM201819 ENG LR PDF
PDF
100% (1)
SWEDU Fund3DCAD SIM201819 ENG LR PDF
405 pages
Thermal Analysis With Solidworks 2014
PDF
50% (2)
Thermal Analysis With Solidworks 2014
17 pages
Tutorial Simulation Professional
PDF
No ratings yet
Tutorial Simulation Professional
252 pages
User Defined Feature (UDF)
PDF
100% (1)
User Defined Feature (UDF)
11 pages
Bevel Gear in SolidWorks - Exercise #5 in SolidWorks - CAD Mode
PDF
100% (2)
Bevel Gear in SolidWorks - Exercise #5 in SolidWorks - CAD Mode
23 pages
SolidWorks Motion Tutorials
PDF
85% (13)
SolidWorks Motion Tutorials
358 pages
Solidworks Simulation PDF
PDF
100% (10)
Solidworks Simulation PDF
504 pages
Solidworks Similation
PDF
100% (1)
Solidworks Similation
447 pages
Solidworks Simulation Standard
PDF
No ratings yet
Solidworks Simulation Standard
110 pages
SW Simulation 2012
PDF
No ratings yet
SW Simulation 2012
510 pages
SolidWorks Simulation Tutorial
PDF
100% (1)
SolidWorks Simulation Tutorial
508 pages
SolidWorks Simulation Tutorial
PDF
88% (16)
SolidWorks Simulation Tutorial
508 pages
SolidWorks Simulation Student Guide 2010 ENG (PDF Library)
PDF
No ratings yet
SolidWorks Simulation Student Guide 2010 ENG (PDF Library)
44 pages
Fea SW PDF
PDF
100% (4)
Fea SW PDF
480 pages
SolidWorks Simulation Black Book
PDF
50% (6)
SolidWorks Simulation Black Book
40 pages
Simulation Best Practices For Large Assemblies, SolidWorks
PDF
No ratings yet
Simulation Best Practices For Large Assemblies, SolidWorks
52 pages
SheetMetalCertificationExam Lesson PDF
PDF
0% (1)
SheetMetalCertificationExam Lesson PDF
28 pages
Practice Exam Questions
PDF
No ratings yet
Practice Exam Questions
22 pages
SAE Project
PDF
100% (3)
SAE Project
200 pages
SOLIDWORKS Simulation 2019 Validation
PDF
100% (3)
SOLIDWORKS Simulation 2019 Validation
140 pages
Solidworks Simulation
PDF
100% (1)
Solidworks Simulation
30 pages
SOLIDWORKS
PDF
100% (3)
SOLIDWORKS
341 pages
Analysis of Machine Elements: Using Solidworks Simulation 2011
PDF
50% (2)
Analysis of Machine Elements: Using Solidworks Simulation 2011
45 pages
Guide For Finite Element Modeling
PDF
No ratings yet
Guide For Finite Element Modeling
28 pages
Solid Flow Simulation
PDF
No ratings yet
Solid Flow Simulation
182 pages
Edu Sae Instructor 2013 Eng
PDF
No ratings yet
Edu Sae Instructor 2013 Eng
205 pages
Technical Reference
PDF
No ratings yet
Technical Reference
120 pages
How To Model A Citrus Squeezer in SolidWorks
PDF
No ratings yet
How To Model A Citrus Squeezer in SolidWorks
40 pages
Solidworks Simulation
PDF
No ratings yet
Solidworks Simulation
162 pages
Ansys Non Linear
PDF
50% (2)
Ansys Non Linear
18 pages
HS Chem Solving Problems
PDF
100% (1)
HS Chem Solving Problems
480 pages
Bridge Project WB 2011 Eng
PDF
No ratings yet
Bridge Project WB 2011 Eng
109 pages
Flow Sim Studentwb 2011 Eng
PDF
No ratings yet
Flow Sim Studentwb 2011 Eng
36 pages
Whats New Solidworks 2020
PDF
100% (1)
Whats New Solidworks 2020
213 pages
SolidWorks Motion Analysis
PDF
100% (1)
SolidWorks Motion Analysis
37 pages
Workshop 1 Importing and Editing an Orphan Mesh: Pump Model: 这个实例中要用到的 cad 模型文件和脚本文件都可以在 abaqus 的
PDF
No ratings yet
Workshop 1 Importing and Editing an Orphan Mesh: Pump Model: 这个实例中要用到的 cad 模型文件和脚本文件都可以在 abaqus 的
36 pages
Solidworks 2012 Part Ii - Advanced Techniques
PDF
No ratings yet
Solidworks 2012 Part Ii - Advanced Techniques
26 pages
Cswe Training Book Free Chapter
PDF
50% (2)
Cswe Training Book Free Chapter
26 pages
Creating Motion in SolidWorks-Motion Drivers
PDF
No ratings yet
Creating Motion in SolidWorks-Motion Drivers
58 pages
CATIA Drafting: One Day Training Day 2 Turbine Tesing Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering Kathmandu University
PDF
No ratings yet
CATIA Drafting: One Day Training Day 2 Turbine Tesing Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering Kathmandu University
1 page
Stress Analysis SW Simulation
PDF
100% (3)
Stress Analysis SW Simulation
70 pages
EDU Motion Student 2013 ENG
PDF
No ratings yet
EDU Motion Student 2013 ENG
20 pages
Designmodeler User Guide
PDF
No ratings yet
Designmodeler User Guide
548 pages
Autodesk Inventor - Stress Analysis Contacts
PDF
100% (1)
Autodesk Inventor - Stress Analysis Contacts
14 pages
Official Guide To Certified Solidworks Associate Exams: Cswa, Csda, Cswsa-Fea
PDF
No ratings yet
Official Guide To Certified Solidworks Associate Exams: Cswa, Csda, Cswsa-Fea
22 pages
Edu Simulation Hotd Instructor 2013
PDF
No ratings yet
Edu Simulation Hotd Instructor 2013
176 pages
Accurate - Design - Simulations - White Paper PDF
PDF
No ratings yet
Accurate - Design - Simulations - White Paper PDF
18 pages
Solidworks Simulation PDF
PDF
No ratings yet
Solidworks Simulation PDF
504 pages
Simulacija SW 18oblasti
PDF
No ratings yet
Simulacija SW 18oblasti
4 pages
SOLIDWORKS Simulation 2018 A Power Guide For Beginners and Intermediate Users by Willis, John Dogra, Sandeep CADArtifex
PDF
100% (1)
SOLIDWORKS Simulation 2018 A Power Guide For Beginners and Intermediate Users by Willis, John Dogra, Sandeep CADArtifex
313 pages
Cosmos Works Designer
PDF
No ratings yet
Cosmos Works Designer
349 pages
SolidWorks Simulation Instructor Guide 2010 ENG
PDF
100% (2)
SolidWorks Simulation Instructor Guide 2010 ENG
57 pages
Solidworks Motions
PDF
No ratings yet
Solidworks Motions
362 pages
Introduction To Finite Element Analysis Using Solidworks Simulation 2012
PDF
0% (1)
Introduction To Finite Element Analysis Using Solidworks Simulation 2012
9 pages
Solidworks Flow Simulation PDF
PDF
No ratings yet
Solidworks Flow Simulation PDF
10 pages
Sonu Kumar SOLIDWORKS Report PDF
PDF
No ratings yet
Sonu Kumar SOLIDWORKS Report PDF
11 pages