Leadership PDF
Leadership PDF
Leadership PDF
The synthesis of art and science is lived by the nurse in the nursing act
Josephine G Paterson
good ideas and an analytical mind, a leader will not Although staff may dislike autocratic leaders, they
be great without emotional intelligence. often work well under them (Bass 2008). Schoel
While research on emotional intelligence has et al (2011) found that well-liked leaders might
developed, the concept remains controversial and be perceived as ineffective while disliked leaders
studies to test its effectiveness are rarely done well might be perceived as effective.
(Cavazotte et al 2012). Few studies have tested Autocratic leaders can be effective because they
whether emotional intelligence is associated with create good structure, and determine what needs
leadership emergence over and above cognitive to be done (Bass 2008). They provide rewards
intelligence, personality traits and gender (Ct for compliance, but punish disobedience (Bass
et al 2010). In studies examining emotional 2008). However, autocratic leaders can be abusive,
intelligence, it is difficult to control the personality create fear among staff and often make decisions
traits that might affect leadership styles. This can without consulting the team (Bass 2008). Followers
make emotional intelligence difficult to measure of an autocratic leader can rely heavily on their
(Cavazotte et al 2012). team leader and may underperform in the leaders
For leaders to identify followers emotions absence. Although the Nursing and Midwifery
accurately, they need to be aware of their own Council (2008) advises that all nurses are
feelings and emotions. Health care is constantly accountable for their actions, an autocratic leader
changing, which some employees may find will take full accountability. In this situation, leaders
overwhelming. Emotionally intelligent leaders will experience significant pressure while followers
not rush to fix, cure or control the responses of staff remain relatively stress-free.
to change, but are empathetic to their concerns, Transactional leaders can be categorised
allowing people to express their feelings without into three types: contingent reward, where
judgement, pressure or guilt (Feather 2009). These rewards are offered if certain criteria are met;
leaders recognise that emotions can change from one management by exception-active, where leaders
situation to another. By managing these emotions, aim to intervene in followers behaviours before
leaders can deal with the stress of failure or decisions they become problematic; and management by
that have led to poor outcomes (Feather 2009). exception-passive, where leaders do not intervene
until followers behaviour becomes problematic
(Horwitz et al 2008).
Transactional leadership When leadership is weak, poor performance is
Offering rewards to others in return for compliance not addressed, resulting in poor-quality patient
is defined as transactional leadership (Sims care and unacceptable behaviour being allowed
et al 2009). Burke et al (2006) suggested that to flourish (Bassett and Westmore 2012). The
transactional leadership, based on contingent management by exception-passive style is similar
rewards, can have a positive effect on followers to the laissez-faire style of leadership, in which
satisfaction and performance. However, a leaders have little control and provide minimal
transactional leader focuses on management tasks, direction (Marquis and Huston 2009). Unlike
and will not identify shared values of a team. By transactional leaders, the laissez-faire leader does
contrast, transformational leaders inspire others not plan or co-ordinate and there is little co-operation
with their vision and work together with their from followers. Laissez-faire leaders are likely to
team to identify common values (Marquis and be inefficient and unproductive (Marriner Tomey
Huston 2009). The transactional approach is 2009). Whitehead et al (2009) suggested that
task-orientated and can be effective when meeting mature followers can thrive under laissez-faire
deadlines, or in emergencies such as when dealing leadership as they need little guidance; however,
with a cardiac arrest. This approach can lead to others may struggle. Box 1 provides a reflective
non-holistic patient care, because nurses focus on description of working for an autocratic leader.
the task they need to complete, rather than the
patient as a whole (Bach and Ellis 2011).
Autocratic leadership is an example of Transformational leadership
transactional leadership. Autocratic leaders have Transformational leaders recognise followers
been described as controlling, power-orientated potential, but in terms of Maslows (1987) hierarchy
and closed-minded (Bass 2008). They stress of needs, will go further to satisfy their higher
obedience, loyalty and strict adherence to the needs such as self-esteem and achieving their full
rules (Bass 2008). Autocratic leaders may be potential to engage followers fully. Vinkenburg
disliked by their team, but this may evolve into et al (2011) suggested that transformational leaders
appreciation and fondness once the positive results inspire their followers to go beyond the call of duty
of their leadership become evident (Bass 2008). and act as mentors. Rolfe (2011) stated that leaders
would wish to be treated. Rolfe (2011) and Grimm The core competencies of situational leaders are
(2010) suggested that leaders should be honest, the ability to identify the performance, competence
acknowledge individual achievements, show interest and commitment of others, and to be flexible
in their working day, include followers in decision (Lynch et al 2011).
making and listen actively to what they are saying. Situational leadership has been defined as being
Trust between leaders and followers is important, based on a relationship between the leaders
because transformational leadership is an approach supportive and directive behaviour, and between
based on change. Leaders who use this approach the followers level of development (Grimm
are able to use their own qualities to motivate their 2010). Supportive behaviour involves the personal
followers to change (Grimm 2010). A leader who has involvement leaders have with their followers,
trust and support from his or her followers can lead a achievable by maintaining communication and
team through change more successfully than a leader providing emotional support. Directive behaviour
who does not (Bach and Ellis 2011, Rolfe 2011). is the amount of direction the leader provides to the
Transformational leadership is important for group, in terms of defining group roles. This can be
improving patient outcomes (Wong and Cummings achieved by the leader explaining the activities each
2007). Malloy and Penprase (2010) suggested role should complete and how these tasks are to be
that it can improve clinical environments so completed. The development level of the followers
clinical leaders can deliver quality agendas and is a result of their own experiences, willingness
ensure staff are engaged in the process. Research and ability to take on responsibility (Grimm 2010).
has shown that where there are well-developed This has also been referred to as the readiness level
transformational leaders, nursing teams take on a follower displays. For example, an enthusiastic
more responsibility, and have greater empowerment beginner would respond most effectively to directive
and job clarity (Dierckx de Casterl et al 2008). leadership (Papworth et al 2009).
The transformational leadership approach Clinical nurse leaders can apply the situational
is popular, but Bass (2008) and many other approach when supervising newly qualified nurses
management theorists have warned that or nursing students, as the leaders approach
transformational qualities need to be combined depends on the followers level of experience and
with traditional transactional management skills. confidence. A newly qualified nurse will have
This may require leaders to adopt an autocratic a base level of clinical knowledge, but will lack
style to manage staff sickness or conflict within the experience and confidence. In this case, the leader
team. This is reflected by Whitehead et al (2009), would adopt a more directive role until the nurse
who suggested that effective leaders need to have gains confidence and experience (Grimm 2010).
vision as well as a plan and structure if goals are to Situational leadership, also known as having
be accomplished. a contingency approach, has become popular, as
Although an effective approach, different situations require different leadership
transformational leadership does not address styles (Grimm 2010). Despite this, it has been
all relationship situations. Some management criticised for focusing too much on leaders and not
requirements of the leaders job can have a enough on group interaction (Parry and Bryman
negative effect on the relationship with followers. 2006), whereas transactional and transformational
For example, addressing issues such as sick leave theories are based on interactions between leaders
and team conflict can have a negative effect on and followers. People and leadership situations
relationships, yet they are essential to being an are complex, and therefore adaptability is
effective leader (Rolfe 2011). paramount to the situational leadership approach.
This approach encourages leaders to recognise
the complexity of work situations and consider
Situational leadership many factors when deciding which action to take
Since healthcare organisations face constant (Whitehead et al 2009). Box 3 provides a reflective
change, it is important for top-tier leaders to description of working for a situational leader.
encourage subordinate leaders to develop different
leadership styles to manage different situations
(Grimm 2010). This requires adoption of the Conclusion
situational leadership approach, where effective Various leadership styles and theories are relevant
leaders adapt their leadership style to manage to nursing practice. Despite studies examining
particular situations. For example, simple or and explaining leadership, no definitive theory has
complicated situations would be best handled emerged to guide leaders, and there is no definitive
through a task-orientated approach such as evidence on which theory is most effective
transactional leadership (Crevani et al 2010). (Rolfe 2011). Although many nurses prefer
References
Bach S, Ellis P (2011) Leadership, Department of Health (2007) Our Management. 18, 6, 715-725. Schoel C, Bluemke M, Mueller P,
Management and Team Working NHS, Our Future. The Stationery Stahlberg D (2011) When
in Nursing. Learning Matters Ltd, Office, London. Marquis BL, Huston CJ (2009) autocratic leaders become an
Exeter. Leadership Roles and Management option: uncertainty and self-esteem
Dierckx de Casterl B, Willemse A, Functions in Nursing: Theory and predict implicit leadership
Bass BM (2008) The Bass Handbook Verschueren M, Milisen K (2008) Application. Sixth edition. Wolters preferences. Journal of Personality
of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Impact of clinical leadership Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams and Social Psychology. 101, 3,
Managerial Applications. Fourth development on the clinical leader, & Wilkins, Philadelphia PA. 521-540.
edition. Free Press, New York NY. nursing team and care-giving
process: a case study. Journal of Marriner Tomey A (2009) Guide Sims HP, Faraj S, Yun S (2009)
Bassett S, Westmore K (2012) How Nursing Management. 16, 6, 753-763. to Nursing Management and When should a leader be directive or
nurse leaders can foster a climate Leadership. Eighth edition. Mosby empowering? How to develop your
of good governance. Nursing Feather R (2009) Emotional Elsevier, Maryland Heights MO. own situational theory of leadership.
Management. 19, 5, 22-24. intelligence in relation to nursing Business Horizons. 52, 2, 149-158.
leadership: does it matter? Journal of Maslow AH (1987) Motivation and
Burke CS, Stagl KC, Klein C, Nursing Management. 17, 3, 376-382. Personality. Third edition. Vinkenburg CJ, van Engen ML,
Goodwin GF, Salas E, Halpin SM Addison-Wesley, New York NY. Eagly AH, Johannesen-Schmidt MC
(2006) What type of leadership Goleman D (1998) What makes a (2011) An exploration of
behaviors are functional in teams? leader? Harvard Business Review. NHS Leadership Academy (2011) stereotypical beliefs about
A meta-analysis. The Leadership 76, 6, 93-102. The Leadership Framework. tinyurl. leadership styles: is
Quarterly. 17, 3, 288-307. com/ankqtep (Last accessed: transformational leadership a
Grimm JW (2010) Effective May 14 2013.) route to womens promotion?
Cavazotte F, Moreno V, Hickmann M leadership: making the difference. The Leadership Quarterly. 22,
(2012) Effects of leader intelligence, Journal of Emergency Nursing. Nursing and Midwifery Council 1, 10-21.
personality and emotional 36, 1, 74-77. (2008) The Code: Standards of
intelligence on transformational Conduct, Performance and Ethics for Walton D (2012) Introducing
leadership and managerial Horwitz IB, Horwitz SK, Daram P, Nurses and Midwives. NMC, London. Emotional Intelligence: A Practical
performance. The Leadership Brandt ML, Brunicardi FC, Guide. Icon Books Ltd, London.
Quarterly. 23, 3, 443-455. Awad SS (2008) Transformational, Papworth MA, Milne D, Boak G
transactional, and passive-avoidant (2009) An exploratory content Wang XH, Howell JM (2010)
Cook MJ (1999) Improving care leadership characteristics of a analysis of situational leadership. Exploring the dual-level effects
requires leadership in nursing. Nurse surgical resident cohort: analysis Journal of Management of transformational leadership
Education Today. 19, 4, 306-312. using the multifactor leadership Development. 28, 7, 593-606. on followers. Journal of Applied
questionnaire and implications Psychology. 95, 6, 1134-1144.
Ct S, Lopes PN, Salovey P, for improving surgical education Parry KW, Bryman A (2006)
Miners CTH (2010) Emotional curriculums. Journal of Surgical Leadership in organizations. In Whitehead DK, Weiss SA,
intelligence and leadership Research. 148, 1, 49-59. Clegg SR, Hardy C, Lawrence TB, Tappen RM (2009) Essentials
emergence in small groups. Nord WR (Eds) The SAGE Handbook of Nursing Leadership and
The Leadership Quarterly. 21, 3, Lynch BM, McCormack B, of Organization Studies. Second Management. Fifth edition.
496-508. McCance T (2011) Development edition. Sage Publications, London, FA Davis Company, Philadelphia PA.
of a model of situational leadership 447-468.
Crevani L, Lindgren M, Packendorff J in residential care for older people. Winkler I (2010) Contemporary
(2010) Leadership, not leaders: on the Journal of Nursing Management. Porter-OGrady T (2003) A different Leadership Theories: Enhancing the
study of leadership as practices and 19, 8, 1058-1069. age for leadership, part 1: new Understanding of the Complexity,
interactions. Scandinavian Journal of context, new content. Journal Subjectivity and Dynamic of
Management. 26, 1, 77-86. Mahoney J (2001) Leadership skills of Nursing Administration. 33, 2, Leadership. Springer, Heidelberg.
for the 21st century. Journal of 105-110.
Cummings G, Lee H, MacGregor T Nursing Management. 9, 5, 269-271. Wong CA, Cummings GG (2007)
et al (2008) Factors contributing Rolfe P (2011) Transformational The relationship between nursing
to nursing leadership: a systematic Malloy T, Penprase B (2010) Nursing leadership theory: what every leadership and patient outcomes: a
review. Journal of Health Services leadership style and psychosocial leader needs to know. Nurse Leader. systematic review. Journal of Nursing
Research and Policy. 13, 4, 240-248. work environment. Journal of Nursing 9, 2, 54-57. Management. 15, 5, 508-521.