Cannabis Use and Cannabis Use Disorders
Cannabis Use and Cannabis Use Disorders
Cannabis Use and Cannabis Use Disorders
after 2007. Initiation of use in the previous 12 months could therefore reduce the proportion of current users See Online/Articles
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
increased from 07% to 11% and the prevalence of who meet criteria for cannabis use disorders. S2215-0366(16)30208-5
daily or near daily cannabis use increased from 19% These changes in the prevalence of cannabis use
to 35%, with the upward trend beginning in 2007. occurred during a period when many US states legalised
All these trends remained signicant after controlling cannabis for medicinal use, but before four states went
for sociodemographic variables. on to legalise recreational cannabis use (after 2014). It is
Surprisingly, the prevalence of cannabis use disorders probably too soon to draw conclusions about the eects
in the previous year remained at 15% of the adult of these legal changes on rates of cannabis use and
population, while the prevalence of disorders in people cannabis related harms,1 but it is likely that these policy
who used cannabis in the previous year decreased from changes will increase the prevalence and frequency of
148% in 2002 to 110% in 2014. The latter nding is cannabis use and, potentially, cannabis use disorders in
surprising given increases in the prevalence and frequency the longer term. To investigate this possibility, the USA
of cannabis use and an increase in the potency of cannabis needs to continue to monitor cannabis use and disorders
products over the same period,7 which would be expected in large scale surveys, such as the National Survey on
to increase the risk of cannabis use disorders in users.8 Drug Use and Health and the Monitoring the Future
There is a discrepancy between these ndings and national survey of high school students. Monitoring
those from the National Epidemiologic Survey of of cannabis use will need to address one of the major
Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC). Hasin and limitations of these surveys for this task, namely, that
colleagues9 reported that the prevalence of DSM-IV they were designed to provide nationally representative
cannabis use disorders increased from 15% to 29%. samples and do not necessarily provide representative
Compton and colleagues suggest that that the samples of individual states. US Federal funding agencies
discrepancy can be explained by the superior methods should consider funding oversampling of representative
of their survey. Grucza and colleagues10 have also population samples within states that have and have not
argued that the earlier NESARC survey might have legalised cannabis for recreational and medical use.
underestimated the prevalence of cannabis use. Notably,
the two surveys produced comparable estimates of Michael Lynskey, *Wayne Hall
previous year use in 201214, but the household survey National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and
Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, UK (ML, WH); and
estimates for 2002 were much higher than the 2002
Centre for Youth Substance Abuse Research, University of
gures reported by NESARC (104% vs 41%). Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Womens Hospital Site, Herston,
Several explanations might explain the decreased QLD 4029, Australia (WH)
prevalence of cannabis use disorders in people who [email protected]
We declare no competing interests. 7 Mehmedic Z, Chandra S, Slade D, et al. Potency trends of Delta9-THC and
other cannabinoids in conscated cannabis preparations from 1993 to
1 Hall W, Lynskey M. Why it is probably too soon to assess the public health
2008. J Forensic Sci 2010; 55: 120917.
eects of legalisation of recreational cannabis use in the USA.
Lancet Psychiatry 2016; 3: 90006. 8 Freeman TP, Winstock AR. Examining the prole of high-potency cannabis
and its association with severity of cannabis dependence. Psychol Med
2 Pardo B. Cannabis policy reforms in the Americas: a comparative analysis of
2015; 45: 318189.
Colorado, Washington, and Uruguay. Int J Drug Policy 2014; 25: 72735.
9 Hasin DS, Saha TD, Kerridge BT, et al. Prevalence of marijuana use disorders
3 Cerda M, Wall M, Keyes KM, Galea S, Hasin D. Medical marijuana laws in
in the United States Between 20012002 and 20122013. JAMA Psychiatry
50 states: investigating the relationship between state legalization of
2015; 72: 123542.
medical marijuana and marijuana use, abuse and dependence.
Drug Alcohol Depend 2012; 120: 2227. 10 Grucza RA, Agrawal A, Krauss MJ, Cavazos-Rehg PA, Bierut LJ. Recent trends
in the prevalence of marijuana use and associated disorders in the United
4 Lynne-Landsman SD, Livingston MD, Wagenaar AC. Eects of state medical
States. JAMA Psychiatry 2016; 73: 30001.
marijuana laws on adolescent marijuana use. Am J Public Health 2013;
103: 150006. 11 Grucza RA, Agrawal A, Krauss MJ, et al. Declining prevalence of marijuana
use disorders among adolescents in the United States, 2002 to 2013.
5 Sabet K. The (often unheard) case against marijuana leniency. In:
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2016; 55: 48794.
Earleywine M, ed. Pot politics: marijuana and the costs of prohibition.
Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2007: 32552.
6 Compton W, Han B, Jones C, Blanco C, Hughes A. Marijuana use and use
disorders in adults in the USA, 200214: analysis of annual cross-sectional
surveys. Lancet Psychiatry 2016; published online Aug 31. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30208-5.