CB Reliablity
CB Reliablity
CB Reliablity
AbstractSince the 1970s, CIGRE has conducted three world- a CB that causes the cessation of one or more of its fundamental
wide surveys on high-voltage circuit-breaker (CB) reliability. functions (i.e., a so-called major failure, MF or MaF) and other
The results of the last inquiry, published last year, are presented failures (minor failures, mf or MiF) and defects. By definition
and compared with those of the former inquiries. With a focus
on the CBs fundamental functions for the system, figures show [1], a defect is an imperfection in the state of an item (or inherent
the growth in reliability during the past decades. The reliability weakness) which can result in one or more failures of the item
is expressed in failure per 100 CB years (CBY) or per 10 000 itself or of another item under the specific service or environ-
operating cycles for the relevant failure modes. The overall major mental or maintenance conditions for a stated period of time.
failure rate improved largely from the first (1.58 per 100 CBY) An MaF will result in an immediate change in the power
to the second (0.67 per 100 CBY) to the third enquiry (0.30 per
100 CBY). The failure rate increases with higher voltage classes; system operating conditions (e.g., the backup protective equip-
GIS CBs have been shown to be twice as reliable and live tank ment being required to remove the fault), or will result in
CBs twice as bad as the average failure rate. Although improved, mandatory removal from service within 30 min for nonsched-
the mechanical operating mechanism is still the subassembly uled maintenance [1].
responsible for most failures; besides, CBs applied for frequent The CBs fundamental functions (i.e., the lack of fundamental
switching purposes show a higher failure rate than average.
functions: MaF) are as follows:
Index TermsFailure modes, high-voltage circuit breaker (CB), does not close or open on command;
major failure, reliability data, reliability definitions, system relia-
closes or opens without command;
bility.
does not make or break the current;
fails to carry the current;
I. INTRODUCTION breakdown to earth or between poles;
breakdown across open pole (internal or external);
locked in open or closed position.
Fig. 4. Overall MaF rate by voltage class for the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd inquiries.
Fig. 2. Third inquiry MaF rate and number of cycles per application.
third inquiry (0.30 per 100 CBY). The main step forwards after
the first inquiry was the improvement in arcing chamber perfor-
mance so that less arcing chambers were required and, there-
fore, fewer parts and operating mechanisms. From the second
to the third inquiry, a further rationalization of the designes-
pecially self-blast technologyhas led to less operating energy
required per arcing chamber and, therefore, there is less me-
chanical stress and wear. Apart from that, modular design and
production quality control are rewarded.
It should also be mentioned that in the standards, more at-
tention has been paid to the requirements for mechanical en-
durance, for instance, to class M2 [6] as will be discussed in
Section IV.
Fig. 3. MaF-rate per drive technology for failures allocated to the drive based C. Voltage Class, Enclosure, Location
on table 3.5.1 [3], 225 [5], and 218, 2110, 2211 (last two columns) [5].
By voltage class, the results from the three surveys show the
same tendency, as can be seen in Fig. 4. Similar to the second in-
quiry, in the third inquiry, the reliability of metal-enclosed CBs
covers the same period as investigated during the second in-
(dead-tank, GIS, hybrid) gives a far lower MaF rate than that of
quiry. The change in products manufactured per year is as fol-
live tank CBs: 0.144 per 100 CBY versus 0.483 per 100 CBY
lows. Over the years, the portion of GIS CBs lays between
[4]. In the third inquiry, the population of ME-enclosed CBs is
20 and 30% with a slow trend to more three-phase enclosed
slightly larger than the population of live-tank breakers. Almost
GIS applications. The remainder are live-tank and dead-tank
all live- and dead-tank breakers are located outdoors as well as
breakers; dead-tank breakers show a strongly decreasing trend
the largest part of the GIS CBs.
since, before 1980, its portion happened to be 40% of all CBs
but it shrunk to 10% in the new millennium (see the Appendix).
D. Age
The technology of the operating mechanism is changing to-
ward spring mechanisms: from a portion of 40% in the early In the third inquiry, failures have been collected per year of
days to 60% these days. The dominant position of hydraulic production, so that the MaF development by age can be cal-
drives in the early days (50%) has over time been reduced to culated. For the population installed after 1978, the tendency
less than 20%; about the same portion as pneumatic drives. In shown in Fig. 5 is expected to come from both improvements in
Fig. 3, the MaF-rate of the hydraulic and pneumatic drives has the technology of younger CBs and an aging and/or wear effect
decreased dramatically and is these days comparable with, or with older CBs.
better than, the MaF-rate of spring-driven mechanisms (column Aging, wear, and corrosion have been reported as the most
after 1999). On average, all technologies show great improve- important causes of MaF (almost 50%). Design faults, manufac-
ments compared to the second inquiry. The MaF-rate decreased turing faults, and incorrect maintenance together are mentioned
from 0.29 per 100 CBY in the former survey to 0.14 per 100 as causes for 15% of the MaF.
CBY in the last survey, related to MaF for which the operating There is a slightly better performance of the CBs installed
mechanism is responsible. For the entire population of the third before 1979 in comparison to those installed between 1979 and
inquiry, the spring drive performs the best (Fig. 3, 2nd column 1983. This may be explained by the high probability that a major
3rd inquiry). overhaul or maybe even replacement of the worst breakers has
The overall MaF rate improved largely from the first (1.58 per taken place, thus improving the average performance of the sub-
100 CBY) to the second (0.67 per 100 CBY) and again to the population, manufactured before 1979.
This article has been accepted for inclusion in a future issue of this journal. Content is final as presented, with the exception of pagination.
TABLE II
PERCENTAGE OF MAF RATE AND MIF RATE PER
FAILURE MODE, THIRD INQUIRY
Fig. 5. Third inquiry MaF-rate per voltage class and by year of production.
TABLE I
PERCENTAGE OF FAILURES RELATED TO THE SUBASSEMBLY AND
COMPONENT RESPONSIBLE, 2ND INQUIRY
TABLE III
CB RELIABILITY DATA FOR SYSTEM STUDIES, ALL VOLTAGES 63 kV
Fig. 8. Third inquiry comparison of the reported and calculated MaF rate per
application.
Fig. 9. Third inquiry MaF-rate per 10 000 operating cycles for different appli-
cations and the total population (All).
voltage class has been collected, no differentiation per voltage
class will be made.
The average number of operating cycles per year is crucial rates calculated with 26.5 operating cycles per year (the bold
for the calculations. The failure figures will be calculated by line in Table III) seem to fit better than those calculated with 42
using both 26.5 from the 1st and 42 from the 2nd/3rd inquiry, operating cycles, that is to say, for the applications with a large
since there are arguments for either weighting method. Yet, the number of operating cycles per year as shown in Fig. 8.
information for the number of cycles per year is collected by Fig. 2 could also be used to plot per application the MaF rate
population cards (26.5) and not per CB (42). per 10 000 operating cycles. Fig. 9 shows these MaF rates, to-
A comparison of the number of MaFs per operating cycle and gether with rates for the total population (All), using the average
per year, for all voltages, between the first, second, and third number of cycles per year of 69, 42, and 26.5, as discussed in
inquiry can be learned from Table III. The last but one column this and the former section. The MaF rate All has to be close
gives the overall MaF rate per year. All of the other columns to to those of the first 7 (or 5) columns. Thus, the average number
the left are related to MaF with a command to close or to open, of operating cycles will be 30 to 40 per year.
resulting into a total MaF per command in the third column from
the right. The last column gives the MaF per year for failures
VI. CONCLUDING REMARKS
without a command to close or open (i.e., the second from right
column minus the third from right column). The reliability of a high-voltage CB is expressed with respect
In order to calculate the MaF rate per operating cycle (com- to the cessation of one of its fundamental functions (i.e., an
mand), the failure mode Locked in open or closed position is MaF) and other failures (i.e., MiF). The definitions, as included
divided among the failures without command (50%) and Does these days in the standards, have been given. The results of three
not open on command (13%), Does not close on command worldwide surveys have been compared, and a steady improve-
(37%). This procedure is the same as applied to the second in- ment of the CBs reliability can be noticed from 1.58 to 0.67 to
quiry [7]. The failure modes Unknown, Other, and Loss of 0.30 MaF per 100 CBY. For the third inquiry, GIS and ME CBs
mechanical integrity are proportionally divided over the other show 50% better performance (0.14 MaF per 100 CBY) and
modes. live-tank CBs have 50% worse performance (0.48 MaF per 100
When comparing the failure modes, much better performance CBY) as shown in [5, Table 227]. Despite great improvements,
can be noticed from the first to second and from the second to most failures are still related to the operating mechanism.
third survey. Only the number of failures Does not open on For modern CBs, the reliability can be expressed in rough
command has not improved that much from the second to third numbers as follows.
inquiry. Once per 50 000 commands to open, a CB will fail to open.
When the MaF rates with and without a command for the third Once per 500 000 commands to open, it will not break the
inquiry are plotted in Fig. 2, it can be noticed that the failure current.
This article has been accepted for inclusion in a future issue of this journal. Content is final as presented, with the exception of pagination.