Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 17 views

    Final Reduced Objective Allowable Allowable Cell Name Value Cost Coefficient Increase Decrease

    Uploaded by

    Anuj Popli
    The document provides sensitivity analysis results for an optimization problem with adjustable cells, constraints, and answers to questions. It summarizes the optimal product mix that maximizes profit within material requirements. Additional documents provide summaries of transportation problems, supply chain networks, inventory statistics, and correlation between stock returns.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Final Reduced Objective Allowable Allowable Cell Name Value Cost Coefficient Increase Decrease

    Uploaded by

    Anuj Popli
    17 views15 pages
    The document provides sensitivity analysis results for an optimization problem with adjustable cells, constraints, and answers to questions. It summarizes the optimal product mix that maximizes profit within material requirements. Additional documents provide summaries of transportation problems, supply chain networks, inventory statistics, and correlation between stock returns.

    Original Title

    Sheet 2.xlsx

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document provides sensitivity analysis results for an optimization problem with adjustable cells, constraints, and answers to questions. It summarizes the optimal product mix that maximizes profit within material requirements. Additional documents provide summaries of transportation problems, supply chain networks, inventory statistics, and correlation between stock returns.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    17 views15 pages

    Final Reduced Objective Allowable Allowable Cell Name Value Cost Coefficient Increase Decrease

    Uploaded by

    Anuj Popli
    The document provides sensitivity analysis results for an optimization problem with adjustable cells, constraints, and answers to questions. It summarizes the optimal product mix that maximizes profit within material requirements. Additional documents provide summaries of transportation problems, supply chain networks, inventory statistics, and correlation between stock returns.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 15

    Microsoft Excel 12.

    0 Sensitivity Report
    Worksheet: [Book1]question 1
    Report Created: 23-11-2016 18:15:24

    Adjustable Cells
    Final Reduced Objective Allowable Allowable
    Cell Name Value Cost Coefficient Increase Decrease
    $C$8 qty Table 10 0 120 60 18
    $D$8 qty chair 8 0 75 105 25
    $E$8 qty sofa 0 -40.38461539 200 40.38461539 1E+030

    Constraints
    Final Shadow Constraint Allowable Allowable
    Cell Name Value Price R.H. Side Increase Decrease
    $G$4 Wood Requirement 160 8.076923077 160 104 86.66666667
    $G$5 Labour Requirement 132 3.8461538461 132 52 52
    $G$6 Polish Requirement 70 0 100 1E+030 30
    ans 2 it will not change anything as the reduced cost in 40
    ans 3 No, the profit from additional unit of labour is 3.84 and the cost is 4
    ans 4 yes it will change the product mix
    ans 5

    2 units of wood 2 16.15385


    3 units of labor 3 11.53846
    5 units of polish 5 0
    27.69231
    Table chair sofa Available Requirement
    Wood 12 5 25 160 160
    Labour 6 9 10 132 132
    Polish 3 5 8 100 70
    Profit/unit 120 75 200 1800
    qty 10 8 0
    Microsoft Excel 12.0 Sensitivity Report
    Worksheet: [Book1]question 2
    Report Created: 23-11-2016 18:38:14

    Adjustable Cells
    Final Reduced Objective Allowable Allowable
    Cell Name Value Cost Coefficient Increase Decrease
    $D$11 qty cereal 0 12.5 40 1E+030 12.5
    $E$11 qty vegetables 3.708333333 0 30 17.27272727 18.57142857
    $F$11 qty fruites 0 15.83333333 50 1E+030 15.83333333
    $G$11 qty milk 0.166666667 0 20 12.5 12.5

    Constraints
    Final Shadow Constraint Allowable Allowable
    Cell Name Value Price R.H. Side Increase Decrease
    $I$6 Carbohydrates actual given 80 0.416666667 80 445 5
    $I$7 Protein actual given 79.16666667 0 50 29.16666667 1E+030
    $I$8 Minerals actual given 75.83333333 0 30 45.83333333 1E+030
    $I$9 Fibres actual given 75 1.083333333 75 5 55
    cereal vegetablesfruites milk requiremeactual given
    Carbohydra 40 20 30 35 80 80
    Protein 10 20 25 30 50 79.16667
    Minerals 5 20 25 10 30 75.83333
    Fibres 10 20 20 5 75 75
    Cost /unit 40 30 50 20 114.5833
    qty 0 3.708333 0 0.166667
    from to Capacity Price qty total cost 210000
    M1 S1 30 2000 40
    M1 S2 50 1600 0
    M2 S1 30 1700 0
    M2 S2 50 1100 60
    S1 P 70 400 40
    S2 P 70 800 60

    Nodes from into net out requirement


    M1 40 0 40 <= 40
    M2 60 0 60 <= 60
    S1 40 40 0= 0
    S2 60 60 0= 0
    P 0 100 -100 = -100
    from to qty price total cost
    SD D 0 420 total refinement cost
    SD H 3.8 100
    LA D 3.2 300
    LA H 0 110
    D NY 3 450
    D C 0.2 550
    H NY 0 470
    H C 3.8 530

    Nodes from into net out requirement


    SD 3.8 0 3.8 <= 5
    LA 3.2 0 3.2 <= 4
    D 3.2 3.2 -1.33E-12 = 0
    H 3.8 3.8 8.9E-13 = 0
    NY 0 3 -3 = -3
    C 0 4 -4 = -4
    4814
    tal refinement cost
    D 700 0 2240
    H 900 3420 0

    10474
    From to qty Price total cost 1525000
    plant 1 Garment plant 1 4000 70
    plant 1 Garment plant 2 0 75
    plant 2 Garment plant 1 1000 65
    plant 2 Garment plant 2 4000 60
    Garment plant 1DC Chennai 0 120 5000
    Garment plant 1DC Mumbai 5000 100 4000
    Garment plant 2DC Chennai 4000 110
    Garment plant 2DC Mumbai 0 125

    Node from into net out


    plant 1 4000 0 4000 <= 6000
    plant 2 5000 0 5000 <= 5000
    Garment plant 1 5000 5000 0= 0
    Garment plant 2 4000 4000 0= 0
    DC Chennai 0 4000 -4000 = -4000
    DC Mumbai 0 5000 -5000 = -5000
    8000
    5000
    From To qty Capacity
    NY P 7 10
    NY I 7 11
    NY C 3 3
    NY D 3 3
    P I 0 2
    P M 7 8
    I C 5 10
    I L 2 2
    C M 0 4
    C L 8 8
    M L 7 7
    D L 3 13

    node from into net out


    NY 20 0 -20 <= -20
    P 7 7 0= 0
    I 7 7 -4.38E-12 = 0
    C 8 8 -7.9E-12 = 0
    M 7 7 0= 0
    D 3 3 0= 0
    L 0 20 20 = 20
    condition 5 working day for nurses followed by 2 consecutive days of
    total number of nurses 17
    nurses required number of workers starting their week
    Monday 12 7
    Tuesday 10 2
    Wednesday 15 3
    Thursday 9 0
    Friday 14 2
    Saturday 10 3
    Sunday 8 0
    total numberof nurses 17
    tive days of

    ng their week
    12
    14
    15
    12
    14
    10
    8
    x y Shipments per year
    Customer1 5 10 200
    Customer2 10 5 150
    Customer3 0 12 200
    Customer4 12 0 300

    x y
    location 9.314161 5.028705

    customer 16.582231
    customer 2 0.68644
    customer 311.63411
    customer 45.701018
    total dista 5456.54
    Mean SD
    stock 1 0.14 0.2 0.468421
    stock 2 0.11 0.15 0.126316
    stock 3 0.1 0.08 0.405263
    1
    correlation matrix
    Correlation
    Stock 1&2 0.6
    Stock 1&3 0.4
    Stock 2&3 0.7

    expected value of R 0.12


    Variance on R 0.008777 0.001065
    0.000359 0.001215
    0.001051 0.00043
    0.010187 0.012897 0.00271

    You might also like