Section : OP-029

G&P GEOTECHNICS SDN BHD Revision : 0

Date : 19-07-2006
INTERPRETATION OF CIU TEST Page 1 of 7

WORK INSTRUCTIONS FOR ENGINEERS

KYW
Compiled by : _____________________________________

LCH
Checked by : _____________________________________

TYC
Approved by : _____________________________________

OP-029. INTERPRETATION OF CIU TEST

 Section : OP-029
G&P GEOTECHNICS SDN BHD Revision : 0
Date : 19-07-2006
INTERPRETATION OF CIU TEST Page 2 of 7

29. INTERPRETATION OF CIU TEST

29.1 INTRODUCTION

The procedure is to determine peak effective friction angle () and apparent cohesion (c) from
the CIU test (Isotropically Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Test) results.

29.2 DEFINITIONS

1 = major principal effective stress

3 = minor principal effective stress
3 = major principal total stress (Cell Pressure)
u = pore water pressure

29.3 PROCEDURE

(1) Usually three CIU tests are carried out at different pre-consolidation stresses (3) for an
undisturbed sample at a particular depth.
(2) Select a suitable criterion used to define the occurrence of failure of the test samples. The
following criteria are commonly used:
Maximum deviator stress (1 3),
Maximum principal stress ratio (1 / 3) can be used in which the deviator stress
continues to increase at large strains.
(3) Based on the selected criteria in step (2), obtain the stress points at failure, ie. values of
1 and 3 when deviator stress or principal stress ratio is maximum, for each test.
(4) If values of 1 and 3 are not available in the laboratory datasheet, the respective values
can be computed as follows:
Deviator stress (1 3) = Axial load / Area
3 = Cell Pressure
1 = Deviator stress + Cell Pressure Pore Pressure
3 = Cell Pressure Pore Pressure
(5) The shear strength parameters (, c) can be interpreted using effective stress Mohr circle
or effective stress path plots (MIT plot or Cambridge plot).
Mohr circle: against '

'

r = (1 3)/2
c'
'
3' 1'
 Section : OP-029
G&P GEOTECHNICS SDN BHD Revision : 0
Date : 19-07-2006
INTERPRETATION OF CIU TEST Page 3 of 7

MIT plot (t-s plot): (1 3)/2 against (1 + 3)/2

t = (1 3)/2
m
1
a
s = (1 + 3)/2

Cambridge plot (q-p plot): (1 - 3) against (1 + 2 3)/3

q = (1 - 3)

m
1
a
p = (1 + 2 3)/3

(6) Select type of the plot to be employed, ie. MIT plot or Cambridge Plot. Compute
coordinates (x,y) for all the stress points obtained in step (5), depends on the type of plot.
For MIT plot: x-value is (1 + 3)/2 and y-value is (1 3)/2.
For Cambridge plot: x-value is (1 + 2 3)/3 and y-value is (1 - 3).
(7) To establish more representative parameters for similar soil type at a site, plot all the
points in a single graph. Plot only the points without showing a line. Important: The x-
axis and y-axis in the graph should be plotted with same scale (1:1).
(8) From scatter points, draw the upper bound line and lower bound line. For lower bound, y-
axis intercept (a) is normally taken as 0.
(9) Draw a design line, which is considered as a moderately conservative line (best fitted line,
or a line below about 2/3 of total nos. of points).

UPPER BOUND
t or q

DESIGN LINE

m LOWER BOUND
1

a
s or p

(10) Calculate the gradient (m) and y-axis intercept (a) of the design line.
(11) Use the following equations to calculate values of and c:
 Section : OP-029
G&P GEOTECHNICS SDN BHD Revision : 0
Date : 19-07-2006
INTERPRETATION OF CIU TEST Page 4 of 7

a) t-s Plot / MIT Plot

= sin-1 m Eq. (1)
c = a / (cos ) Eq. (2)
b) q-p Plot / Cambridge Plot
m = 6 sin / (3 sin ) Eq. (3)
c = a tan /m Eq. (4)

29.4 WORKED EXAMPLE

i. Maximum stress ratio is used as failure criteria in this example.

ii. Referring to sample datasheet in Appendix A, a stress point at failure (1, 3) is
obtained, in which its principal stress ratio is maximum.
Maximum 1 / 3 = 3.101
1 = 172.71 kN/m2
3 = 55.7 kN/m2
iii. Repeat step (ii) for other set of CIU test results.

MIT PLOT
iv. The stress points obtained in steps (ii) and (iii) are plotted in MIT plot, as shown in
Figure A1. The plot includes the stress points from CIU tests for the undisturbed
samples at different boreholes. Coordinates (xi, yi) are computed, for example by
using the values in step (ii):
x1 = (1 + 3)/2 = 114.505 kN/m2
y1 = (1 - 3)/2 = 58.505 kN/m2
v. The upper bound and lower bound lines are first drawn on the plot and then a design
line is also drawn, as shown in Figure A1.
vi. The gradient (m) and y-axis intercept (a) of the design line are calculated as follows:
52 5
m= = 0.47
100
a = 5kN / m 2
vii. The values of and c are computed using Eq. (1) and (2):
' = sin 1 m = sin 1 (0.47 ) = 28
a 5
c' = = 6kN / m 2
cos ' cos 28

CAMBRIDGE PLOT
viii. The stress points obtained in steps (ii) and (iii) are plotted in Cambridge plot, as
shown in Figure A2. Coordinates (xi, yi) are computed, for example by using the
values in step (ii):
x1 = (1 + 23)/3 = 94.7 kN/m2
y1 = (1 - 3) = 117 kN/m2
ix. The gradient (m) and y-axis intercept (a) of the design line are calculated as follows:
122 12
m= = 1 .1
100
a = 12kN / m 2
x. The values of and c are computed using Eq. (3) and (4):
' = sin 1 [3(1.1) /(6 + 1.1)] = 28
12 tan 28
c' = 6kN / m 2
1.1

= 28, c = 6 kN/m2 are adopted as design values.

 Section : OP-029
G&P GEOTECHNICS SDN BHD Revision : 0
Date : 19-07-2006
INTERPRETATION OF CIU TEST Page 5 of 7

APPENDIX A SAMPLE DATASHEET

 Section : OP-029
G&P GEOTECHNICS SDN BHD Revision : 0
Date : 19-07-2006
INTERPRETATION OF CIU TEST Page 6 of 7

FIGURE A1 t-s Plot

 Section : OP-029
G&P GEOTECHNICS SDN BHD Revision : 0
Date : 19-07-2006
INTERPRETATION OF CIU TEST Page 7 of 7

FIGURE A2 q-p Plot