Shariah Compliant Equity Risk Management
Shariah Compliant Equity Risk Management
Shariah Compliant Equity Risk Management
Bacha, Obiyathulla/I
INCEIF the Global University in Islamic Finance
2004
Online at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/12632/
MPRA Paper No. 12632, posted 12. January 2009 / 09:49
Value Preservation Through Risk
Management. A Shariah Compliant Proposal
For Equity Risk Management
(April 2003)
Management Center
Kulliyyah of Economics & Management Sciences
International Islamic University Malaysia
Jalan Gombak, 53100 Kuala Lumpur
E-Mail : [email protected]
Abstract
This paper makes a case for the preservation of Muslim Wealth through risk management. It provides an
exposition of risk management techniques used in conventional finance and outlines the limitations faced
by Muslim fund managers and businesses. This limitation arises from the proscription of key risk-
management tools, in particular financial derivatives. Though the reasons for the prohibition are diverse,
the overriding concern appears to be that they encourage speculative behaviour. As such the emphasis of
Islamic risk management has been on, On Balance Sheet methods. The problem with On Balance Sheet
methods is that they require the restructuring of business transactions which can render businesses less
competitive and subject to residual risk. The paper proposes a portfolio insurance scheme that uses the
logic and mechanics of conventional Index Put Options but in a Shariah compliant manner. The proposal
is intended to strike a balance between the need to avoid speculation and the genuine need for hedging
equity risks.
2
SECTION 1 : Introduction
If there is one key feature that has an equal presence in both the Islamic and
Conventional Financial System, it must be the presence of Risk. While much has been
done in conventional financial markets to both tame and minimize risk, the same cannot
be said of Islamic capital markets. This inattention to the management of risk has meant
that players in Islamic Capital Markets have little by which to ensure the preservation of
their wealth. Islamic businesses and mutual funds are therefore often left to take the
brunt of the exposures that arise in their operating environments. One could cite several
reasons for this inattention to the management of risk and the consequent preservation
of value. First and foremost is perhaps the lack of appreciation, in particular among the
Jurist, of the need to manage risk. A second reason, could be the suspicion of most
shariah scholars to conventional risk management tools, most of which are financial
derivatives. Yet another reason could be attributed to the argument that according to the
shariah, in order to avoid riba and justify a return one must either expend effort or have
taken on risk.
While this inadequacy may not have been a serious constraint when a capital
market is still small, the ability to manage the risks that arise from business transactions
becomes critical as the market develops. The ability to innovate new techniques and
must have the ability to keep the level of risk they deem acceptable and lay off or reduce
any risk beyond this preferred level. Since risk preference differs among investors, well
functioning capital markets must have the means by which to shift these risks. An
inability to dissipate risk thru redistribution leads to risk concentration which in turn
renders capital markets and their financial systems vulnerable. Islamic Capital Markets,
3
now in their development stage must grapple with the issue of risk management if it is to
develop further. This will be particularly true for economies where Islamic Capital
The objectives of this paper are threefold. The first, is to make a case for risk
management and to show that continued negligence can be inimical to the future
exposition of the key risk management techniques used in conventional finance and
Muslim investors. The third objective of this paper is to propose a risk management
alternative that uses the logic of proscribed derivatives, to manage equity risks.
This paper is divided into five sections. Section 2 below, introduces key risk
management techniques. Section 3, discusses the stand of Shariah scholars on the use
of financial derivatives, which are typically the building blocks of conventional risk
management. Section 4, lays out the proposed alternative arrangement for managing
with returns from an investment. These uncertainties would translate into volatility or the
dispersion around a mean, the commonly accepted measure of risk is standard deviation
(σ). Thus, unless an asset comes with “guaranteed” fixed future returns, it has some
amount of uncertainty and therefore risk. Infact, even a “guaranteed” instrument such
4
as a government bond has risks if either the issuer’s credit worthiness is questionable or
other externalities like inflation is present. In a sense, there is really no such a thing as a
Risk Management is built on a variant of the old adage that ‘a dollar saved, is a
dollar a dollar earned’. Except here, a dollar saved refers not to money not consumed
but to money protected from the vagaries of risk. Risk management therefore refers to
While numerous risk management techniques are possible, these can generally
be categorized into two broad methodologies, i.e. the use of On Balance Sheet or Off
Balance Sheet methods. The first refers to the process of restructuring business
transactions in a way that will minimize asset-liability mismatches in the Balance Sheet.
The latter refers to the use of external, usually exchange traded derivatives to offset
risks that arise from a business transaction. Since the use of derivatives is external to
the transaction, these positions have no impact on the operational assets or liabilities of
the firm and so do not show up in the Balance Sheet. However, since exchange traded
derivatives are standardized, highly liquid, have low transaction costs and do not involve
changing existing business methods, managing risk by means of off Balance Sheet
5
What makes risk management challenging is the fact that risks and returns are
generally positively correlated. In reducing risk one invariably has to sacrifice potential
returns. Thus, the risk-return tradeoff. The challenge is to protect the expected returns
Numerous types of risks are prevalent in capital markets. The more common of
these are (i) Market/price risk, which refers to changes in returns caused by changes in
market prices of the asset. (ii) Inflation risk; which refers to the erosion in purchasing
power (iii) Interest rate risk; can be either in the form of a change in asset prices arising
from interest rate changes or as a change in the cost of funds/capital. (iv) Default/Credit
risk; arises when a debtor is unable to meet its obligations, (v) Liquidity risk, is risk that
Exchange risk, refers to the potential losses that can result when the exchange rate of a
In addition to these types of exposures or risks that may arise directly from
having undertaken a transaction, one could also face indirect risks. For example, a bank
with solely domestic activities may not have direct foreign exchange exposure but could
quite simply the process of protecting one’s investment value by establishing a hedge
transaction which has a risk profile exactly the opposite of the original exposure. The
basic idea being to offset the volatility in the underlying asset with that of the hedge
6
position. Since price movements in the two positions exactly offset one another, a fully
hedged position would have zero fluctuation and therefore zero (or negligible) standard
deviation.
Having outlined risk management, types of risks and hedging, the remainder of
this section will examine indepth, two key risks in capital markets, (i) Equity (Price) risk
and Currency/Foreign Exchange risk. We will examine what these risks are, how they
impact the value of one’s assets and what techniques are available to manage these
techniques are shariah compliant and would therefore be useable in preserving Muslim
wealth.
equity prices cause volatility of equity returns and thereby hurts wealth creation. The
most basic form of equity risk management is diversification. Diversification refers to the
expansion of a portfolio across different assets or stocks in order to reduce risk; i.e.,
portfolio standard deviation. The reason portfolio standard deviation reduces with the
typically denoted as ‘ρ’; or rho has a value range between + 1.0 ≤ ρ ≤ − 1.0 . Since
no two assets are likely to have a perfectly positive correlation of +1.0, the inclusion of
even a randomly selected stock reduces portfolio std. deviation. As correlation gets less
however has its limits. Even a fully diversified portfolio does zero risk to zero, but has
7
residual risk known as; systematic risk. Figure 1, shows the reduction in portfolio risk
Figure 1
Portfolio risk
Unsystematic risk
(diversified away)
systematic risk
Thus, it turns out that total risk as measured by standard deviation has two
component parts; unsystematic and systematic risk. The unsystematic portion of risk is
the sum total of company specific and random risks. This portion is diversified away.
Systematic risk, which is the non-diversifiable portion, is a stock risk that is caused by
system wide or macro economic risks. So while diversification is indeed a form of risk
reduce the systematic risk. Further reduction in systematic risk is only possible with
international diversification. This however, leads to the creation of other yet risks. As
we will see shortly, the advent of financial derivatives has changed this limitation.
8
Asset Allocation
outlook. For example, if a fund manager is bullish about stocks over the immediate
future, he allocates a larger portion of his funds to stocks while reducing the portions in
cash and/or bonds. He does the opposite if he is bearish about stocks. Though
intended largely to take advantage of expected market movements, the fact that it
changes portfolio risk profiles, implies that asset allocation too can be a form of equity
risk management.
Like diversification however, asset allocation too has its limits. In some ways,
asset allocation is betting on market movements. And like all expectation plays, can be
hazardous. Should markets move opposite to expectations, the fund manager is worse
off. Since there are really two dimensions to asset allocation, (i) timing; determining how
the proportion of asset classes should change and (ii) stock selection; if the proportion of
stocks is to be increased, which stocks should be bought (sold). A fund manager has
Whereas the two basic strategies above were limited in scope, the advent of
Not only did it become possible to overcome the limitations of the basic strategies, but
entire new strategies to alter risk profiles became possible. The most commonly used
equity derivatives in risk management have been Stock Index Futures contracts and
Index/Equity Options.
9
2.3.1: Stock Index Futures Contracts (SIF)
In using SIF contracts two new possibilities opened up for risk managers. First,
was the ability to manage overall equity exposure and second, the ability to further
Systematic Risk which is the residual risk that remains even with full
given a bearish short term outlook intends to reduce by half the systematic risk of his
portfolio, the hedge would be to combine his portfolio with a short position in SIF
contracts equivalent to half his portfolio value. If a 3 month SIF contract is used for the
purpose, the portfolio’s systematic risk is halved for the 3 month period of the hedge.
reflection of the portfolio systematic risk. Depending on market outlook a fund manager
might want to alter his portfolio beta. Generally; when one is bearish; reduce beta when
bullish; increase beta. Altering beta by changing portfolio composition is a very difficult
process. It is time consuming, iterative and expensive. With SIF contracts, changing
Suppose you currently hold a portfolio that has a beta of 1.5. You are worried
about impending volatility in the stock market over the immediate future. With a beta of
1.5, your portfolio would be 50% more volatile than the stock market’s volatility. As
1
See: Obiyathulla Bacha (2001), pgs. 74 – 77, 81 - 83
10
such, you want to reduce your portfolio beta to a more acceptable 1.0 beta. How can you
Information;
Since this is a partial hedge, what proportion of your portfolio should you hedge?
Answer:
portfolio. This is classic wealth preservation. One manages equity risk by hedging the
current portfolio using SIF contracts to lock-in a value regardless of underlying market
movement.
11
Thus, a portfolio’s beta can be easily altered by use of SIF contracts. In this case, by
going short RM2 million worth of SIF contracts, the portfolio beta is reduced by 50%.
Since you now have a long position in stocks, hedging would require that you should
establish an offsetting short position in SIF contracts. The number of SIF contracts to
= RM1,440,000 = 12 Contracts
RM120,000
To see how your portfolio value would be protected by the hedge, let us examine 2
possible market scenarios over the next 90 days. If the hedge strategy is appropriate
you should be able lock-in the same value regardless of market performance. To see if
this is true, we examine two scenarios, first when the market falls 20% and second, rises
20%.
12
Scenario 1: The Stock Market falls 20%
Under Scenario 2
13
With hedging notice that the value of the portfolio has grown by RM20,184 over the 90-
day period, regardless of market movement. This increase in value is identical to the
RM20,184 –RM,1,440
----------------------------- x 4 = 0.062 or 6.2% (identical to rf rate)
RM1,200,000
The more important implication for us, is the fact that the Long Stock, Short futures
In essence, the fully hedged portfolio mimics a riskless asset and therefore has earnings
equal to the risk-free rate of return. Thus, not only did we not lose anything even when
the market fell 20%, we added an amount approximating the risk free to the original
value of our wealth. Furthermore, since replication is possible, note that asset-allocation
strategies too become easier and a lot cheaper with SIF contracts.
The advent of options has meant that risk-management need not just be about
risk reduction. It becomes possible to simultaneously reduce risk while also keeping the
upside profit potential intact. This inherent flexibility has meant that options have
become a key tool in equity risk management. Though numerous option based
strategies are possible, the most popular where equity risk management is concerned is
known as Portfolio Insurance. Portfolio Insurance involves the use of put options in
order to hedge equity risk. Portfolio managers would use index put options to limit
14
Portfolio Insurance – Illustration (Single stock example)2
Suppose you had just gone long (purchased) one lot of Syarikat XYZ stock at a
price of RM15.00 each, for a total investment of RM15,000. You believe this stock has
long term potential but wish to protect yourself from any short term downside movement
in price. Suppose 3 month, at the money3 put options on XYZ stock is being quoted at
RM0.15 or 15 sen each or RM150 per lot (RM0.15 x 1,000). The appropriate option
Long Stock
15
0 Stock Price at Maturity
2
See, Obiyathullah Bacha, (2001), pgs. 181 - 183
3
At the money, refers to options whose exercise price equals the current stock price.
15
Notice that the payoff to the hedged position (solid line) has a limited downside but
unlimited upside. What this means is that the maximum loss to hedged portfolio is the
premium paid, RM150 (RM0.15 X 1,000), but the upside is kept intact. The last column
of the above table depicts this overall payoff. The minimum value of the portfolio is
RM14,850; which is the original portfolio value of RM15,000 less the premium of RM150.
A portfolio insurance strategy therefore provides both downside protection and upside
The above illustrations showed how the impact of downside risk to equity
portfolios can be muted by use of financial derivatives. It should be noted that aside
from the above portfolio insurance strategies numerous other trading strategies to fit
different market scenarios are possible with derivatives. However, as things now stand,
with the exception of the most basic risk management tools; diversification and asset
allocation, none of the other techniques are currently available to managers of Islamic
portfolios. Recall that diversification only helps up to a point. With most global equity
markets having fallen on average close to 40% over the last 3 years, even fully
diversified stock portfolios would have fallen as much. The limitation of asset allocation
Empirical studies have shown that active asset allocation strategies seldom outperform
over the long term. So, what can an Islamic fund manager do to preserve the value of
his portfolio and the wealth of his Muslim investors? The answer, as it stands now is
very little!
16
2.5: Currency / Exchange Rate Risk
prevails for the Muslim firm facing currency or exchange rate risk. Given the systematic
nature of currency risk, an Islamic firm engaged in international trade is just as exposed
as non Islamic ones. Value destruction happens with currency exposure, when a
be made, appreciates. It is in the area of currency risk management that most of the
innovation in risk management has occurred. As in the case of all exposures, currency
risk can be managed by either on or off Balance Sheet methods. The easier and by far
more popular method is to use off Balance Sheet techniques using currency derivatives.
The table below summarizes the appropriate hedge position for the four most popular
currency derivatives.
While the above methods simply involve buying or establishing the appropriate position
in mostly exchange traded derivatives without the need to change the underlying foreign
currency transaction, the on balance sheet methods described below require either a
Among the more common customized techniques to managing currency risk are as
follows:
17
(i) Exposure Netting: Involves the creation of an offsetting exposure in the foreign
future, we hedge by creating a ¥en payable for the same amount and maturity.
This essentially means buying something in Japan for the amount of our
(ii) Pricing Strategy: Here we hedge the potential exchange rate loss by marking
(iii) Money Market Hedge4: Involves the use of simultaneous borrowing and lending
in two different currencies in order to ‘lock-in’ the home currency value of the
borrow in the foreign currency5, covert to home currency at the spot rate and
period.
(iv) Currency Risk Sharing Agreement (CRSA); Is an agreement under which the
two parties agree to carry out a transaction at an exchange rate that splits the
profit/loss for large exchange rate movements. The sharing takes place for spot
customized on Balance Sheet techniques, are usually more difficult to establish and
have serious inadequacies. Exposure netting is easier said than done. Often there isn’t
anything suitable that a company can buy in the foreign country in order to create the
4
Assumes the use of Islamic banks.
5
The amount borrowed would be the present value of the receivable.
18
liability. Worse, other risks are often created in the process. The use of Pricing strategy
has the serious downside that it would render the firm uncompetitive. Particularly,
against non Muslim businesses that can easily use derivatives to hedge at much
lower/neglible costs. Yet, given the current state of affairs, the only exchange rate risk
customized hedges such as CRSA and Exposure Netting. The problem here is that the
encumbered in some way, they could easily take their business elsewhere.
SECTION 3 : Risk Management & Islamic Finance the Current State of Affairs
If there is one conclusion that we can draw from our discussion it is that, Muslim
businesses face just the same risk exposures that conventional ones do. Yet, the
alternatives available to them to manage these risks are severely limited. The limitation
arises from the fact that current thinking among Islamic jurists seems to be that while
First, it keeps them vulnerable to value loss and second, renders them less competitive.
In a zero sum world, if we imagine two firms trading with each other, if one side is able to
fully hedge while the other is unable to, losses incurred by one will constitute the gains to
the other. Wealth is being transferred from the unhedged to the hedged. Over time, this
and is not the intention here, an overview of the current stand would be useful in the
context of our discussion. As any student of Islamic finance would agree, the jury is still
19
out as far as a definitive opinion on derivatives is concerned. The validity and
Islamic scholars have found them objectionable, their reasons for objection differs.
There does not appear to be a consensus. Much of the work by Islamic scholars has
been of a highly juridical nature. They examine derivatives within narrow confines of
contractual arrangements and thereby miss the broader picture of why instruments like
futures and options are needed in modern business environments. The table below
20
Opinion on Exchange Traded Options
Source Summary of Opinion
These opinions not withstanding, the fact that risk management realities may
make it inevitable to use derivative instruments is shown by the fact that surveys by the
Islamic Development Bank (IDB) find that some Islamic Financial Institution (IFIs) indeed
21
use off Balance Sheet hedging tools such as forwards, swaps etc in managing their
currency risk.6
Regardless of what their main reasons for objecting to these instruments may be,
a common feature in most of the Scholars’ opinions, appears to be the concern for
potential speculative behaviour. While this overriding concern, that derivatives could
abuse and the need to use the instruments for genuine hedging. At the core of this
management of equity risk is outlined. The focus is solely on the preservation of wealth
invested in equity instruments. The proposal is built on the need to strike a balance
between avoiding speculative behavior and enabling genuine hedging needs. The
However, by not being able to hedge with these instruments and exposing one’s wealth
speculation is.
derivatives but to create an institutional arrangement which will alter the risk profile of an
existing equity portfolio to that of a less risky one. To see how the proposal will work, we
6
See Tariqullah Khan (2002 ) pgs 25 - 26
22
use the example an Islamic mutual fund or unit trust faced with equity risks. Recall, that
currently, aside from diversification and asset allocation, Islamic Mutual funds have no
conventional systems, to protect consumers who may not be able to hedge their
exposures. In particular, the FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) of the US.
Based on this logic, the proposal requires the establishment of a government or quasi
government agency with initial capital from the government. The agency’s role will be to
protect Muslim wealth invested in equity by selling “portfolio insurance” to Islamic Mutual
funds. In essence, the agency sells certificates that work like conventional Index Put
options with perhaps a one year maturity. In exchange for paying premiums, the Islamic
Mutual fund receives put certificates of a given face value, exercisable anytime within
the one year maturity period. Should the mutual fund experience a diminution in its
portfolio and decide to exercise its put certificates, it will exercise by selling the insured
portion of its portfolio at the market price that prevailed at the time of insurance. As with
conventional derivatives, such exercise can be done only once until maturity and would
be exercisable in full.
At this point, several questions should arise in one’s mind. In particular, given
the several banking failures in the US even with the presence of the FDIC, insurance is
obviously no panacea. The essential questions that need to be addressed would be:
(ii) How will it handle the potentially huge moral hazard problems and abuses?
(iii) How will the agency offering the insurance, hedge its own exposure?
23
(iv) Who would be the ultimate beneficiaries of this proposal and why would Islamic
Mutual funds want to participate?
The discussion that follows will be organized in the order of the above questions.
For ease of identification, let us name this proposed agency; IEGC for Islamic Equity
Islamic Mutual funds in exchange for premiums. In essence, IEGC provides a guarantee
against stock price declines. Experience however shows that guarantees, especially
blanket ones are subject to serious abuse. Thus, for the proposal to be workable,
Premiums charged by the IEGC will be dependent on two factors; first on the
overall riskiness of a mutual fund’s portfolio, and second on the Face Value of the
conventional insurance and are intended to protect the insurer. Since the asset to be
insured are publicly listed and exchange traded stocks, measuring their riskiness is
relatively straight forward. The overall Beta7 of the mutual fund’s portfolio could be the
riskiness measure. Thus, higher risk portfolios would be subject to higher premiums
whereas lower risk ones, lower premium. The second determinant, the insured amount
would obviously depend on the size of the mutual fund. However, in keeping with
experience of insured regimes, it is proposed that the total amount insured be capped at
a maximum of perhaps 30% of the total value of the fund to be insured. For example,
suppose a mutual fund currently has a stock portfolio with a total current value of RM100
million. The value insured for such a fund should be RM30 million. This means that the
insured mutual fund when exercising its put certificates will receive RM30 million from
7
Recall that Beta is the measure of the systematic risk of portfolio
24
IEGC in exchange for 30% of its portfolio. Thus, the mutual fund gets to sell the stocks
within the insured 30% of its total portfolio at the original value that prevailed at the time
of insurance. IEGC now becomes the owner of these stocks. Any losses beyond the
30% will be borne by the fund’s investors/unit holders. Thus, the proposed arrangement
problems related to moral hazard. To be workable, the proposed arrangement must not
give fund managers the incentive to increase portfolio risk subsequent to being insured
nor induce dysfunctional behavior along moral hazard lines. There are four reasons why
(i) Premiums are dependent on risk, higher risk portfolios will be penalized with
will be continual, subsequent increases in the overall portfolio will incur additional
fact for all public mutual funds, the trustees appointed as part of the approval
process already monitor their funds. Mutual funds are required to report all
transactions to the trustee. Thus, IEGC would merely have to latch on to this
(ii) Since the asset being hedged are stocks that are publicly listed and traded,
stock portfolios is not difficult. In fact, compared to the effort needed to monitor
25
the quality of a bank’s loans portfolio as does the FDIC, this will be a lot easier
(iii) The third reason why there is in-built control against moral hazard, is the fact that
even with the portfolio insurance, the hedge is a partial not a total one. Since
mutual funds will be covered only up to a maximum 30% of the total value of the
their funds, it will be in the interest of mutual fund managements to act prudently.
(iv) Finally, moral hazard is also controlled by the fact that the put option bought from
IEGC is exercisable only once and in full within the one year maturity. This is a
exercisable only once and in full, fund managers will have to think carefully
before exercising and taking profit. Once exercised, the insurance lapses, and a
new one has to be bought; at new premiums. The mutual fund will also have to
give up on the portion of portfolio insured. Thus, it will not be in the fund
manger’s interest to exercise when there are small dips in prices and / or when
In selling portfolio insurance, it is clear that IEGC will be taking on the portfolio
risks passed on it. A portion of the equity risk of Islamic Mutual funds is being
transferred to the insurer. The cumulative total will be substantial. This risk must be
managed. Unless carefully managed, the entity’s initial capital could be quickly wiped
maximum 30% of a fund’s total value, the agency has taken the first steps in managing
exposure.
26
Figure 2, in Appendix shows the risk profile to IEGC. In capping the value
insured for a mutual fund, IEGC is limiting its downside. As such, the risk profile of the
agency is one of limited upside (profit potential) and limited downside (loss potential).
Next, it has to do what all insurance companies do, invest its capital and proceeds from
however, the IEGC has greater exposure to systematic risk. This is because, unlike fire,
accident or other such insurance where the events are independent and uncorrelated,
stock price movements are. A sliding stock market where most stocks fall together is
entirely possible. Such systemic risk is also the case with banking and therefore FDIC
type insurance. This is why, in insuring situations such as this, government participation
is needed. Still, IEGC has one advantage over conventional insurance, it takes
possession of the insured asset once the insured party exercises. This is unlike
conventional insurance which only pays for the losses but does not take over the insured
asset. On exercise, IEGC takes possession of the insured portion of the stock portfolio.
the logical means by which to manage its risks would be to invest in assets uncorrelated
to equity movements. The first such asset would be Islamic bonds, Green bills, Islamic
infrastructure projects and other halal businesses should be acceptable. Income from
these investments, its holdings of stocks taken over from mutual funds, together with
premiums received should be used to build on the initial capital. By investing in a wide
range of projects IEGC will be diversifying and so managing its risk. In holding on to the
stocks it has received on exercise by mutual funds, IEGC has the potential to gain from
subsequent recovery in the stock prices. As an institution not subject to short term
performance measures as mutual funds are, IEGC can afford to hold on to this stocks
27
for longer periods. Finally, to further diversify and reduce risk, the practice of
possible here. In this situation, agencies similar to IEGC in other Muslim countries could
invest in each other, thereby dissipating the risk of any one entity through cross border
diversification.
Two related issues remain in this discussion. The first is the question of who is
really being helped by this portfolio insurance proposal and second, why should Islamic
mutual funds be willing to participate in this scheme. In addressing the first, it should be
obvious that the ultimate beneficiary would be individual Muslim investors in mutual
funds. Mutual fund investment is a form of saving and constitutes a key portion of
mutual fund makes losses. Any stability in mutual fund returns directly benefits its
investors. In addition to more stabilized returns, individual investors also benefit from
the monitoring services of the IEGC. As the agency continuously monitors mutual funds
for changes in the risk profile of its insured funds, investors benefit from the scrutiny.
The mere fact that an external party is monitoring their activity can tamper a fund
manager’s behavior. This adds another layer of safety to the preservation of their
wealth.
The final question that remains is, why should Islamic Mutual funds be willing to
join such a insurance scheme. Obviously, participation will mean increased operational
costs. Aside from the cost of the insurance premium there will be higher administrative
28
costs in line with the need for additional compliance. Given these, it would appear that it
will not be in the interest of a fund manager to participate. However, even without
government fiat, it would be possible to get most funds to participate if, as in the case of
backing. When investors are shown as direct beneficiaries, market forces would ensure
participation of the mutual funds. As investors gravitate towards the insured funds, it will
The objective of this paper was to make a case for wealth preservation through
conventional finance and outlined the limitations faced by Muslim fund managers and
businesses. This limitation arises from the proscription of the key set of risk
management tools; namely financial derivatives. Though the reasons for proscribing
derivatives are varied, the overriding concern appears to be that they encourage
speculative behaviour. As such, the emphasis of Islamic risk management has been on,
equity risks and methods such as exposure-netting, pricing strategy and CRSA in the
case of currency exposure. The problem with On Balance- Sheet Methods is that they
require the restructuring of business transactions which can render businesses less
The paper goes on to propose a portfolio insurance scheme where Islamic Mutual funds
would be able to buy the equivalent of Index Put options from a centralized agency. At
the heart of the proposal is the need to strike a balance between the key concern of
29
Shariah scholars, which is to prohibit speculation and the genuine hedging need to
preserved. One should keep in mind, that a failure to manage risk is not just imprudent
but value destructive. Risk reduction, aside from stabilizing returns can be value
creating. As risk is reduced, the required returns for an investment reduces. For a given
cash flow, the investment increases in value as required returns falls. Thus, risk
management can be not only wealth preserving but also wealth creating.
One would be tempted to ask if the proposed scheme has real world precedence.
The answer is, yes. Indeed there are several institutions that already play the same role
as the proposed IEGC. The FDIC, which has already been mentioned is one. Another
would be the Pension Benefits Guarantee Corporation (PBGC) also of the US.
In a sense, even within stock markets, market makers and specialist who are
required to buy when stocks are falling are also playing a similar role. They however,
assure liquidity not value. Their similarity with the IEGC is that they too would end up
going long (buying) stocks during down markets. Their survivability has depended on
their ability to manage their risks.8 Finally, the proposed equity insurance is really not
very different in risk profile terms, from the credit guarantees that Islamic Banks routinely
providing a put option to its customer. Thus, it is no different from the put option
8
Their ability to use derivatives to manage their risk has obviously made their task easier.
30
In conclusion, the current inattention to risk management, in particular, equity risk
can have serious long term implications on the overall economy. The inability to hedge
equity risk and the resultant losses would cause money to flow away from Capital
Markets and into non-tradeables such as real-estate or worse, gold, jewelry and the like.
This stunts capital market growth, denies businesses the easy access to capital in order
to grow and allocates resources into non tradeable assets which are amenable to asset
bubbles. Money capital goes not into producing goods but into “safe” but “dead” assets.
The result would be prohibitively high cost of capital for businesses, rendering the overall
31
Reference
2. Mahmoud A. El-Gamal (2003); Islamic Hedge Fund, Strategies & Tools. IIF,
Dubai, 2003.
9. Vogel F.E & Hayes S.L. (1998); Islamic Law and Finance; Kluwer Law
International Cambridge, USA.
32
Figure 2
Payoff
(Vo – x )
Profit (+)
0 Portfolio Value at T
Vo
-0.3 Vo
Loss (-)
-Vo
Figure 2 shows the payoff and risk profile to IEGC for insuring a single Islamic Mutual
Fund. Note that the agency’s profit (from premium) is limited to the area between the
horizontal axis and X. It’s losses however have a potential maximum of -0.3 Vo, where
Vo is the portfolio value at the time the insurance is initiated. The point 0.3 Vo, reflects
the 30% cap on total value of portfolio insured. At any point to the right of Vo, the agency
keeps its premium. Losses are incurred when portfolio value falls below, (Vo – x ).
33
Figure 3
Long Equity/Stock
0.3 Vo
0.7 Vo
Vo
Portfolio Value at T
(Vo – x)
-0.7 Vo
-Vo
Figure 3 shows the payoff and risk profile to an Insured Mutual fund. The solid line that passes
through Vo and ends at –Vo represents the payoff to the original long stock or equities position. It
also represents the payoff to the unhedged position. The dotted line denoted x which ends at
0.3 Vo is the mirror opposite of the payoff to IEGC. At any point to the right of Vo, (when value is
rising), the insurance is worthless and therefore has a net cost of – x. At any value below Vo, the
insurance begins to be valuable. At any point to the left of (Vo – x), the insurance is worth
exercising. The maximum profit from exercising the insurance is reached at 0.3 Vo, which reflects
the fact that insurance is capped at 30% of total fund value. The bold line shows the payoff to the
overall insured position. It is derived by aggregating the dotted line x and the long equity payoff
line. Thus, at any point to the left of (Vo - x), the insurance scheme is always superior to the
unhedged position. To the right of that point however, the insured scheme produces a return
lower than the unhedged long equity position by the amount of the premium.
34