02 Fundamental
02 Fundamental
02 Fundamental
14
IN BULLETS
2.1 INTRODUCTION
* Long Term Evo lu tion (L TE) sta1is from 3GPP release 8
* 3GPP Techni cal Report 25.913 defi nes the key objecti ves of LTEas :
o support for a fl ex ibl e transmi ssion bandwidth up to 20 MHz
o peak down link data rate of I 00 Mbps when using 2 rece ive anten na at the UE
o peak uplink data rate of 50 Mbps when using I tran smi t antenna at the U E
o round trip ti me of less than I0 ms
o downlink average spectrum effi ciency improved 3 to 4 times relative to release 6 HSDPA
o uplink ave rage spectrum effici ency im proved 2 to 3 times re lat ive to release 6 HSUPA
* LTE has a flat arch itectu re which minimi ses the nlllnber of network elements
* LT'E is optimised for Packet Sw itched (PS) services but includes funct ionality to handle Circuit Sw itched (CS) services, e.g. CS
fallback to UMTS
* LTE supports the speech service using Vo ice over IP. Otherw ise, the speech service can be supported by all ow ing the UE to fa llback to
UMTS. GSM or CDMA2000
* LTE supports Mu ltimedi a Broadcast Mu lticast Services (MBMS) for the tran smi ssion of' mobile TV
* Frequency Division Dup lex (FDD) and Time Division Duplex (TDD) ve rsions of LTE have been standardi sed. Both allow channe l
bandwidths of up to 20 MH z
* LTE all ows inter-wo rkin g with ex isting GSM , UMTS and CDMA2000 technologi es
* LTE uses QPSK, 16QAM and 64QAM modulation schemes with OFDMA (downlink) and SC-FDMA (uplink) multiple access
technologies
* LTE supports Mu lti ple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) antenna technology in the do wnlin k direction. 3GPP releases 8 and 9 do not
support MIMO in the uplink direction
* Ex isting spectrum all ocations can be re-farmed for the introduction of LTE
* LTE simplifi es network planning by minimi sing the requirement for manually planned neighbour li sts
* LTE includes Self Organising Netwo rk (SON) functionality to help autom ate netwo rk configuration, opti mi sation, fau lt findin g and
fault hand ling
* LTE Advanced starts fro m 3G PP release I0
* LTE Advanced introduces Carri er Aggregation to provide wider efTectivc channe l band width s. It also introduces MIMO in the uplink
direct ion, as we ll as increas ing the number of antenna elements whi ch can be used for MIMO in the do wnlin k di rection
* Other technologies continue to deve lop in parall el to LTE. e.g. UMTS introduces HSPA+ with MIMO, 64QAM and Multi-Carrier
Transmi ssion all ow ing effe cti ve chan nel bandwidths of I0, 20 and 40 MI-Iz
15
LONG TERM EVOLUTION (LTE)
2.2 ARCHITECTURE
* LTE refers to the Evolved UMTS Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN), whereas System Architecture Evo luti on (SAE) refers to the
Evo lved Packet Core (EPC). Figure I illu strates this divi sion between radio access and core networks
* LTE uses a n at architecture without a Rad io Netwo rk Co ntro ll er (RNC), nor Base Station Co ntroll er (BSC)
* The LTE equ ivale nt of a UMTS Node B is an 'evolved' Node BoreN ode B. An eN ode B is the Base T ransce iver Stati on (8TS) fo r
LTE. Radio resource man agement is comp leted by the eN ode 8
* eN ode 8 are connected to the Evolved Packet Core (EPC) using a Mobi li ty Management Entity (MME) for con trol plane signallin g,
and a Servi ng Gateway for user plane data
* The Serving Gateway is co nn ected to a Packet Data Netwo rk (PDN) Gateway for conn ectiv ity to externa l networks including the
public internet
2GJ
~;;;
.<::-
u c
-<2
E_=:e
JB ~
g;,w
(f)
-------------- ------- ---------------
.-------------------------------------------
w
f-
""-
..,-,,r
..
- .
~~ .
I
;
c
0
:g
0
>
w
E
~
Ol
c
0
_J
* Figure 2 illustrates a rad io access network which includes macro, micro, pico and femto BTS, as we ll as re lays and repeaters. T his type
of radio access network is known as a heterogeneous network because it includes a range of different 8TS types
* The most common 8TS type is the macro 8TS, w hich 3GPP catego ri ses as a ' wide area 8TS' . 3GPP categori ses pico 8TS as ' local
area BTS ' and femto 8TS as ' home BTS '. 3GPP does not spec ify a separate power class for micro BTS but a w ide area BTS w ith
red uced transmit power cou ld be designed and used as a micro BTS . 3GPP also specifies se parate requirements for repeaters and relays
* Macro 8TS are characterised by having their antenna above roof-top level so their coverage area is relative ly large. Their transmit
power is ty pically 20, 40 or 60 Watts, and they normall y have more than a single sector
* Micro BTS are characterised by havin g their antenna below roof-to p level so their coverage tends to be limited by the nei ghbourin g
buildings. The ir transmit power is ty pi cally 5 or I 0 W, and they ofte n have on ly a si ngle sector
* Pico 8TS are designed to provide coverage and capacity across small areas. T heir transmi t power does not exceed 0.25 W so their
antenna needs to be c lose to the so urce of traffic
* Femto BTS are in te nd ed for use at home, or in small offices. The ir tran smit power does not exceed 0.1 W so they need to be used in
areas whe re coverage from other BTS types is relati ve ly weak, e.g. indoors. In co ntrast to other BTS types, th e location of Femto BTS
is not usua ll y controlled by the network operator. End-users are free to place their Femto BTS wherever they li ke. The network
architecture for Femto 8TS also differs from other BTS types. Femto BTS are connected to th e Evolved Packet Co re usin g a Home
eNode 8 Gateway (also known as a Femto Gateway). The co nnection between the Femto BTS and Fem to Gateway typicall y uses a
hom e broadband con nection, e.g. ADSL
* Repeaters can be used to ex tend th e coverage of an existing BTS. They re-tran smit the uplink and downlink signa ls w ithout hav ing to
decod e any of the content. Repeaters have one anten na direc ted towards the donor ce ll, and a seco nd antenna directed toward s th e
target coverage area. The target coverage area co uld be an indoor location so the second anten na co uld be indoors
* Re lays also re ly upon an RF connection to a donor ceiL but Re lays differ from Repeaters because Re lays have th e ir own cells and the ir
ow n protoco l stack, i.e. a Re lay is similar to a normal BTS but w ithout a fi xed transport connection. Relays decode signals and make
radio reso urce management decisions
16
IN BULLETS
,~ PDN
Gateway Home eNode B
Gateway
Repeater
* The vari ous BTS types typ icall y share the same channel bandwidth, so heterogeneous network s generate challenges in term s of co-
channel interference and RF planning to ach ieve the intended coverage from each site. Traffic management can also be challenging
when C losed Subscriber Groups (CSG) are used to ensure that only authorised subscribers can use certain BTS, e.g. only the fami ly
owning a Femto BTS can use that BTS. T hat BTS then appears as a so urce of interference to other subscribers
17
LONG TERM EVOLUTION (LTE)
INTERFACES
* Fig ure 3 illustrates the most impotiant interface s fo r th e radi o access netwo rk
* The air-interfa ce connecti on between th e User Equipm ent (UE) and th e eNode B is known as th e Uu. The UE and eN ode B make use of
th e Uu interface w henever they transmi t or rece ive across the LTE a ir-interface
* The X2 interface connects one eNode B to another eN ode B. T hi s allows both sig nallin g and data to be trans ferred betwee n ne ighbouring
eNode B
o the contro l pl ane of the X2 (X2-CP) interface all ows signalling betwee n eN ode B
o the user plane of th e X2 (X2- UP) interface a llows th e transfer of applicati o n data betwee n eNode B
* T he S I interface connects an eN ode B to th e Evo lved Packet Co re (EPC). T hi s all ows both s ig na lling and data to be transferred between
th e Evo lved Packet Core (EPC) and Evo lved UM TS Radi o Access Netwo rk (E-UTRAN)
o th e control plane o f the S I (S 1-M ME) in terface all ows signalling with the MME
o th e use r plane of th e S I (S I- UP) interface a llows appli cation data transfe r throug h the Servin g Gateway
* A pplicati on Protocol s have been specifi ed to defin e the signa lling procedures and message types which can be sent ac ross the X2 and
S l in terfaces, i. e. X2-AP and S l -AP
MME
'\uu
t \
eNode B ( \\
UE
* Fig ure 4 illustrates an example phys ical representati on o f the X2 and S I inte rfaces . The eN ode Bare connected to an IP backh aul
transpo rt netwo rk using a sing le Ethernet cabl e. T hi s cable tra nsfers informati o n for both the X2 an d S I interfaces
* In the case of th e X2 in terface , th e IP ro uters w ithin the tran sport network rece ive data from one eN ode Band di rect it towa rds another
eN ode B. In th e case of the S I interface, th e IP ro uters prov ide co nnectivity between th e eN ode Band the Evo lved Packet Core
* T he Eth ern et co nn ec ti on betwee n th e eNode Band transport netwo rk could be based upo n either an electri cal o r optica l Gi gabit
Eth ernet cable
* IP Q uali ty o f Serv ice (QoS) can be used to differenti ate and pri ori tise packets transferred across the IP backhaul
* T iming ove r Packet (ToP) ca n be used to prov ide the eNode B w ith sy nchroni sation in fo rm at io n. To P is specified within IEE E 1588.
A ltern ative ly, G lobal Positio ning System (G PS) satellites ca n be used, or a sy nchroni sation sig na l can be prov ided by a co-sited BTS
18
IN BULLETS
IP Backhaul
Transport
Network
* A more complete set of interfaces associated with LTE and the Evolved Packet Core is shown in Figure 5. Only a si ngle eN ode B is
shown in thi s figure so the X2 interface does not appear. The control plane of the S I interface is shown as the S 1-MME, whil e the user
plane is shown as the S I-UP
* The S II interface connects the MME to the Serving Gateway. Thi s allows signalling information for mobility and bearer management
to be transferred. Application data does not use the S II interface
* The S5 interface connects the Serv ing Gateway to the Packet Data Network (PDN) Gateway. Both control plane signalling and user
plane data use the S5 interface. The PDN Gateway provides connectivity to the set of IP serv ices so the S5 represents the main
connection for app lication data across the Evo lved Packet Core
* The SS interface is similar to the S5 interface but it terminates at a PDN Gateway belonging to a different PLMN. This interface is used
by end-users who are roaming away from their home PLMN
* The S6a interface connects the MME to the Home Subscriber Server (HSS). The HSS hosts a database containing subscription related
information for the population of end-users. The HSS represents an evolution of the Home Location Register (I-ILR) used by earl ier
network architectures
* The Sl3 interface connects the MME to the Equipment Identity Register (EIR). The EIR stores the International Mob il e Equ ipment
Identities (I MEl) of the end-user devices used within the network. These IMEl can be white li sted'. grey listed ' or "black li sted' to
control access to the network
* The Gx interface connects the Policy and Charging Enforcement Function (PCEF) within the PDN Gateway to the Policy and Charging
Ru les Function (PCRF). The PCRF provides QoS and charging information to the PDN Gateway. The Gx interface is also known as
the S7 interface in some references
* The SG i interface provides connectivity between the PDN Gateway and a packet data network. The packet data network could be an
externa l network (either public or private), or could belong to the operator. The SG i interface corresponds to the Gi interface in earlier
network architectures
* The S3 interface allows the transfer of contro l plane signalling between the MME and an SGSN. The SGSN co uld belong to either a
UMTS or GPRS network. The main purpose of the signalling is to allow mobility between the various access tec hnologies
* The S4 interface all ows the transfer of application data between the Serving Gateway and SGSN when a Di rect Tunnel' is not
estab li shed between the RNC and Serving Gateway. Thi s interface may be used when a UE roam s from the LTE network across to a
UMTS netwo rk
* The S2a interface provides connect ivity betwee n the PDN Gateway and a non-3GPP access technology. Figure 5 illustrates the non-
3GPP technology as a wireless L/\N. WiMax is a non-3GPP access tech nology whi ch could be connected using the S2a interface
19
LONG TERM EVOLUTION (LTE)
IP Services
i . ~~ON
.
~- f" """ ~ Gateway
RNC
Node B
Figure 5- Additional interfaces for LTE and the Evolved Packet Core
* The S 12 interface allows the transfer of app lication data between the Serving Gateway and RNC when a ' Direct Tunne l' is establi shed.
The S4 interface represents the alternative when a ' Direct Tunnel' is not estab li shed. Both the S 12 and S4 interfaces are applicable
when a UE roams from the LTE network across to a UMTS network
* 3GPP References: TS 36.410, TS 36.420, TS 23.002, TS 23.402
20
IN BULLETS
CHANNEL BANDWIDTHS
* 3GPP has spec ifi ed a set of 6 channel bandwidths, ranging from 1.4 MHz to 20 MHz. These are presented in Table I
Channel Bandwidth
1.4 MHz 3 MHz 5 MHz IOMHz 15 MHz 20 MHz
Number of Resource Blocks 6 15 25 50 75 100
Number of Subcarricrs 72 180 300 600 900 1200
Uplink Subcarrier Bandwidth (MI-Iz) 108 2.7 45 9.0 13.5 18.0
Downlink Subcarrier Band wi dth (MHz) 1.095 2.715 4.5 15 9.0 15 13.5 15 18.015
* A Reso urce Block represents the bas ic unit of resource for the LTE air-interface. The eN ode B sched uler allocates Resource Blocks to
UE when allo wing data transfer
* The subcarriers belong to the Orthogo nal Frequency Division Multipl e Access (OFDMA) technology in the do wnlink, and the Single
Carri er Frequency Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) technology in th e uplink
* There are 12 subcarriers per Resource Block so the number of su bcarri ers equals 12 x number of Resource Blocks
* Each subcarri er occupi es 15 kl-lz so the total subcarri er bandwidth eq uals 15 kl-l z x number of subcarriers
* The downlink subcarri er bandwidth includes an additional 15 kl-l z to accommodate a null subcarri er at the center of all other
subcarri ers. The null subcarrier provides 15 kl-lz of empty spectrum within whi ch nothing is transmitted
* The total subcarri er bandwidth is less than the channel bandwidth to allow for the roll-off of emi ss ions and to provide some guard band
* The larger channel bandwidths provide support for the higher throughputs. Smaller channel bandwidth s provide support for lower
throughputs but are easier to accommodate within ex isting spectrum allocations
* 3GPP al so specifies a subcarri er spac ing of7.5 kH z (in addition to the subcarrier spacing of 15 kl-lz). The subcarrier spac ing of7.5 kHz
is only used in cell s which are ded icated to Multimedia Broadcast Multicast Services (MBMS). There are 24 rather than 12 subcarriers
per Resource Block when using the 7.5 kH z subcarrier spacing so the total band width of a Resource Block remains the same
* LTE Advanced provides support for Carrier Aggregation which allows multipl e 'Component Carri ers' to be used in parall el. Thi s
effecti vely increases th e channel band width to the sum of the indi vidual Component Carri ers
* 3G PP References: TS 36. I 0 I, TS 36. I04, TS 36.21 I
21
LONG T ERM EVOLUTION (LTE)
* FDD is based upon using two separate RF carri ers for uplink and downlink tran smi ss ion, i.e. th e UE tran smits usin g one RF carri er
(uplink), w hile the BTS transmits us ing a d iffe rent RF carrier (downlink)
* TOO is based upon using th e same RF carrier fo r both the uplink and dow nlin k transmi ssions. T he UE and BTS cannot transmit
simultaneous ly in the case ofTDD becau se th ey share the sa me RF carri er
* FDD uses frame structure ' type I ', whereas TOO uses frame structure 'ty pe 2 ' . T hese frame structures are prese nted in section 3.2
* TOO is attractive for systems where th e data transfer is hi ghly asym metri c because th e ratio between the uplink and downlink
transmi ssions can be adjusted appropriate ly and the RF carri er remains full y utili sed. In the case of FDD, o ne of the RF carri ers wo uld
be under utili sed w hen the data transfer is hi ghly asymmetric
* TOO devices benefit from not req uirin g a duplexer. Thi s he lps to reduce th e cost of the dev ice. A duplexer is required by FDD devices
to extract the uplink s ignal from the antenna, w hile at th e same time inse1ting the downlink signal into th e antenna. Duplexers tend to
increase th e receiver noise figure in the receive direction and generate an add itional loss in the transmit direction
* FDD is attracti ve for systems where the requirement for uplin k and downlink capacity is re lative ly sy mmetric. FDD can offer hi gher
throughputs because data transfer can be continuous in both directions. The capacity associated w ith a pair of FDD carriers is greate r
than the capacity associated w ith a sing le TOO carrier, but a greate r quanti ty of spectrum is req ui red
* FDD can be simpler to deploy in term s of sy nchroni sation requirements. In gene ral, it is not necessary for neighbouring FDD BTS to
be time sy nchroni sed . Ne ighbouring TOO BTS require time sy nchroni sation to limit leve ls of interfere nce between uplink and
downlink transmissions
* LTE also supports a third duplexing technology known as half duplex FDD. T he concept of half duplex FDD is illustrated in Figure 7
Half Duplex FDD- high level perspective Half Duplex FDD- single UE perspective
,------------- --- --------------------- ----- ----------------
* In the case of half dupl ex FDD, the BTS is ab le to tran smit and rece ive simul taneous ly, but the UE is not a ble to transm it and receive
simultaneo usly . Both uplink and downlink RF carriers can be fully utili sed by time multipl ex in g different U E
* Half duplex FDD uses fra me structure ' type I ', i. e. the same frame structure as FDD. T hi s frame structure is prese nted in section 3.2
* The BTS scheduler is responsible for prov idin g half dup lex operation by ensuring that UE do not need to tran smit uplink data at the
same tim e as recei vin g downlink data. T hi s has to account for the requirements to send and rece ive acknow ledge ments after data has
been tran s ferred
* S imilar to TOO, hal f duplex FDD ca n be an attracti ve solution because it avo ids the requirement for a dupl exe r w ithin th e UE so helps
to red uce th e cost of dev ices. Thi s argume nt is especiall y va li d for operating bands whi ch have small dupl ex se parations (frequency
separation between th e uplink and do wnli nk RF carriers). Dup lexe r de sign beco mes more challeng in g and more expens ive whe n th e
uplink and down lin k operating bands are re lat ive ly c lose to eac h other
22
IN BULLETS
* The majority of operating bands ha ve their uplink frequenc ies below the ir down li nk frequenc ies. This approach helps to conserve UE
battery power by all owing UE to tran smit within the band which has the bet1er rad io propagation performance, i.e. rad io propagation
tends to be better at lower f'requencies. Operating bands 13, 14, 20 and 24 have uplink bands whi ch are higher than th eir down lin k
bands
* The re lease 9 and 10 ve rsions of the 3GPP spec ificat ions for LTE include a note to state that operating band 6 is not app li cable.
Operat in g band 6 rema in s app licabl e to UMTS but is superseded by operat ing bands 17 and 18 for LTE
* Operating bands 15 and 16 are excluded from the 3GPP spec ification s for LTE. These operating bands are shown in Table 3. and have
been defined by ETS I for use within Europe, Midd le East and Af'r ica. They are speci fi ed for UMTS within ETS I TS I 02 735
23
LONG TERM EVOLUTION (LTE)
2 .6.2 TDD
* The LTE operating bands spec ified by 3GPP for Time Di vision Duplex (TOO) are shown in Table 4
* The majority of these operati ng bands have a lso been specifi ed for use by UMTS. This allows UMTS spectrum to be re-farmed for
LTE, or for LTE and UMTS to share the same operating bands
* In the case of TOO, sharing the sa:me operating band is more challenging due to both the BTS and UE tran smittin g and receiving on the
sa me RF carrier. For examp le, if LTE and UMTS are a ll ocated adjacent channels, a UMTS BTS could experience interference from an
LTE BTS if the LTE BTS tran smits whi le the UMTS BTS rece ives. In the case of FDD, the two BTS would be protected by the duplex
spacing, i.e. there is a re lat ive ly large frequency se paration between the tran smit and receive channels
* Coexistence of the two techno logies is made simp ler if they are synchron ised so both sets of BTS transm it at the same time, and both
popu lations of UE tran smit at the same time. The transm it and receive pattern s for LTE TOO ha ve been spec ified to account for the
coex istence requirements w ith other technologies
* LTE and UMTS do not share the same operating band numbering scheme. LTE numbers its TOO operating bands from 33 upward s,
whereas UMTS references its TOO operating bands as a, b, c, d, e and f
* Operating bands 33 to 40 were introduced withi n the re lease 8 vers ion of the 3GPP specification s. Operating bands 41 to 43 were
introduced with in the re lease I 0 vers ion of the 3GPP specificat ions
24
IN BULLETS
BEARER TYPES
* LTE pro vid es an e nd- to-end service usin g the hi erarchy of bearers show n in Fig ure 8
* An Evo lved Packet System (EPS) bea rer prov ides user plane con necti vity between th e UE an d a Packet Data Network (PDN) Gateway
* An initi a l EPS bearer is estab li shed when the UE registe rs w ith the network usin g th e Attach procedure. This EPS bearer is known as
the de fa ult" EPS bea rer and is used to prov ide always-on con nectivity
* Other EPS bearers ca n be establi shed to co nn ect to oth er PDN Gateways, o r to pro vide d iffe re nt Q ua lity of Se rvice (QoS) to th e same
PDN Gateway . These EPS bearers a re known as ded icated' EPS beare rs
* A ll use r plane data tran sferred usin g the sa me EPS Bearer has th e same QoS
* An EPS Bearer is generated from a co mbin at ion of E-UTRAN Radio Access Bearer (E-RAB) and S5/S8 Beare r
* T he SS inte rface provides con necti vity betwee n a home Servin g Gateway a nd a hom e PDN Gateway . T he SS interface provides
ro amin g connectivity between a visited Serv in g Gateway and a hom e PDN Gateway
( End-to-End Service
()
I I I j_ j_
i I I I
( E-RAB ( ( S5/S8 Bearer (
I J
( Radio Bearer (( S1 Bearer (
Radio S1 S5/S8 Gi
* A n E-RAB is generated from a combin ation of Radio Bearer and S I Bearer. Radio bearers provide the connection across th e a ir-
interface, w hereas S I bearers provide th e co nn ection across th e transport network
25
LONG TERM EVOLUTION (LTE)
~-C-EL_L___o_c_H_
Handover E-UTRA Handover ( ]
GSM CONNECTED
_,] " RRC CONNECTED
CELL_PCH
ceo with
optio nal Reselection,
URA_PCH Reselectio n NAC C ceo
UTRA
l
~-R_R_C_I_D_LE_~
]
Reselection ' - - -R
E-UTRA
_R_C
_ ID_L_E_ ____,
Res election (
Res election,
GSM/GPRS
~---ID_L_E_ _~
Cell Change Order
Figure 9 - RRC states for LTE and their interaction with UMTS and GSM/GPRS
* Figure I 0 illustrates mobility between LT E and CDMA2000 I x RTT (I times Rad io Transmi ssion Techno logy ), and mobi lity betwee n
LT E and CDMA2000 I-IRPD (Hi gh Rate Packet Data) . Mob ili ty is based upon handovers and ce ll rese lections
26
IN BULLETS
* In add ition to the state tran sit ions illustrated in Figure 9 and Figure I0. LTE supports connection re lease with re-direction from E-
UTRA RRC Connected mode to UMTS, GSM/GPRS and CD MA2000. Re-direction information is signa lled to the UE within the RRC
Connection Release message
* 3G PP References: TS 36.33 1
27
LONG TERM EVOLUTION (LTE)
28
IN BULLETS
Table 5- RRC messages transferred by each SRB (between eN ode Band liE)
Table 6- RRC messages transferTed by SRB I (between eN ode Band Relay Node)
29
LONG TERM EVOLUTION (LTE)
GBR Non-GBR
QoS Class Identifier (QCI) ./ ,;'
* The QoS Class Identifier (QCI) represents a pointer to a set of standard ised QoS characteristics. 3GPP has adopted this approach to
reduce both the signall ing requirement and the maximum number of possible parameter combinations. Table 8 presents the relationship
between QCI and the associated set of QoS characteristics
* The QCI determines which bearers are categorised as GBR and wh ich are categorised as non-GBR
* The priority associated with each QCI is applied when forwarding packets across the network. High priority packets are transferred
before low priority packets. A priority of I corresponds to the highest priority
* The packet delay budget assoc iated with each QCI defines an upper bound for the packet delay between the UE and the Policy and
Charging Enforcement Function (PCEF) within the PDN Gateway. The delay budget figure is app licable to both the uplink and
down link with a 98% confidence leve l. It is assumed that the average delay between the eNode Band PCEF is 20 ms so the remaining
de lay budget is availab le to the radio access network
* The packet error loss rate defines the percentage of higher laye r packets, e.g. IP packets, which are lost during periods that th e network
is not congested. The loss rate between the eNode Band PCEF is ass um ed to be negligible when the network is not congested so the
requirement applies to the radio access network. Retransmi ssions at th e MAC and RLC layers help to achieve the packet error loss rate
requirements
30
IN BULLETS
* The A llocati on and Retenti on Pri ori ty (AR P) presented in Table 7 defin es :
o Pre-emption Capab ili ty (s hall not tri gge r pre-emption. may tri gge r pre-emptio n). Thi s characte ri stic determin es whether or no t a
new connection request is allowed to pre-empt an ex isting connectio n
o Pre-emption Vuln erab ility (not pre-emptabl e, pre-emptabl e). Thi s characteri stic determines whether or not an ex istin g connecti on
is all owed to be pre-empted by a new connection request
o Pri ori ty (I to 15 ) where 15 co rres ponds to no priority, 14 corres ponds to the lo west pri ority and I corresponds to the hi ghest
pri ority. Thi s charac teri sti c can be used to identify whi ch of the ex isting pre-emptabl e co nnecti ons should be targeted for pre-
empti on. If the co nnecti on req uest has re lati vely low pri ori ty then it may not be abl e to pre-empt any of the ex istin g connections.
Thi s pri ority is independent ofthe pri ority de fined in Table 8 whi ch is associated with packet handling o f ex istin g connectio ns
* The Gua ranteed Bit Ra te (GBR) in Ta bl e 7 defi nes the minimum bit rate whic h can be ex pected to be made ava il abl e to the bearer
when required. It can be config ured with va lues betwee n 0 and I 0 000 Mbps. The GB R can be specified independentl y fo r the upl ink
and dow nlink
* The Max imum Bit Rate (MBR) in Tab le 7 defines the max imum bit rate which can be expected to be made ava ilable to the bearer
when required. It can be configured with valu es betwee n 0 and I 0 000 Mbps. The MBR can be spec ifi ed independentl y for the uplink
and dow nlink
* The APN Aggregate Max imum Bit Rate (A PN-AMBR) in Table 7 defin es the maximum allowed throughput for an indi vidual UE
based upon th e sum of its non-GBR bearers to a specifi c APN, i. e. the total non-GBR throughput generated by a UE to a spec ifi c APN
is not all owed to exceed thi s limit. It can be configured with values between I kbps and 65 280 Mbps. and can be spec ifi ed
independentl y for the uplink and dow nlin k
* The UE Aggregate Maximu m Bit Rate (UE-AMB R) in Ta bl e 7 defin es the max imum all owed throughput for a UE based upon the sum
of all its non-GBR bea rers. It can be viewed as a limit pl aced upon the sum of all APN-AMB R belonging to a specifi c UE. The MME
sets the UE-AM BR to the sum of the APN-A MBR of all acti ve APN up to the va lue of the subscri bed UE-AMB R. It can be configured
with values between 0 and 10 000 Mbps, and can be spec ifi ed independentl y for the uplink and downlink
* 3GPP References : TS 36.300. TS 23.401. TS 23.203
31
LONG TERM EVOLUTION (LTE)
o EMM-REG ISTER ED
These states are introduced within 3GPP TS 23.40 I. Additional EMM states and sub- states are described w ithin 3GPP TS 24.30 I. The
main two EMM states are illustrated in Figure II
Attach
[,_D_E_R_E_~_7s_~_E_R_E_D_~]~~-----f~[~__R_E_G_~_s~_~_R_E_D_~]
- Detach -
* A UE is in the EMM-DEREGISTERED state when it is first sw itched on. The MME does not have knowledge of the UE location so
the UE cannot be paged. In addition, the UE cannot have any user plane bearers while in the EMM-DEREG ISTERED state
* UE attempt to move into the EMM -REG ISTERED state whenever poss ible. This is achieved by completing the attach procedure. This
procedure regi ste rs the UE with th e MME and establishes a default bearer for application data transfer. UE can also move into the
EMM-REG ISTERED state by completing a Tracking Area Update after an incoming inter-system transition
* The location ofUE in the EMM -REG ISTERED state is known by the MME to at least an accuracy of the Tracking Area li st allocated
to the UE, i.e. the set of Tracking Areas with which the UE is reg istered. If the Tracking Area li st includes only a single Tracking Area
then the location of the UE is known to be within that Tracking Area. Depending upon the EPS Connection Management (ECM) state,
the location of a UE can also be known by the MME to the accuracy of a single eN ode B
* The UE always has at least one active Packet Data Network (PDN) connection when in the EMM-REGISTERED state (the default
bearer is established during the Attach procedure) . De-activating all PDN connections causes the UE to move back to the EMM-
DEREGISTERED state
* UE can also make the tran sition from the EMM-REGISTERED state to the EMM-DEREGISTERED state by completing the Detach
procedure, or by having a Tracking Area update rejected
32
IN BULLETS
Connection Connection
Released Released
* A UE in ECM -IDL E state does not have a Non-Access Stratum (NAS) signalling connecti on to the MME
* UE compl ete cell se lecti on and ce ll reselection when in the ECM -1 DLE state
* The location of UE in the ECM -IDL E state is kno wn by the MME to an accuracy of the Trac kin g Area li st all ocated to the UE, i.e. the
set of Tracking Areas with whi ch the UE is registered
* When a UE is in both the EMM-R EG ISTERED and ECM -I DLE states then typi cal procedures include:
o Tracking Area Upd ates (TAU) tri gge red by mobility and the peri od ic TAU timer (T3 4 12)
o TAU tri ggered for MME load balancing. i.e. relocating the UE 's signalling connecti on to a di ffe rent MME
o TAU tri ggered for the UE to signal a change of its Core Netwo rk Capab ility or its UE specific DRX cycle
o responding to pag ing messages by perfo rming a Service Request procedure
o perfo rmin g the Service Req uest procedure when uplink user plane data is to be sent
* The UE and MM E enter the ECM -CONNECTE D state after a NAS signalling connection has been estab li shed. From the UE
perspecti ve, thi s corresponds to establi shin g an RRC connecti on between the UE and eN ode B, whil e from the MME perspective, thi s
corres pond s to establi shing an S I co nnecti on between the eN ode Band MME
* Initi al NAS messages whi ch can be used to initi ate a transiti on from EC M-ID LE to EC M-CONNECTED are Attach Request, Track ing
Area Update Request. Service Re quest and Detac h Request. i.e. the Attac h, Trac kin g Area Update, Service Request and Detac h
procedures all req uire the UE to be in RRC connected mode
* The locati on of UE in th e ECM-CONNECTED state is known by the MME to an acc uracy of the serving eNode B
* UE mob ility is hand led using handu' <: rs rather than cell rcsdcction when UE are in the ECM-CONN ECTED stale
* UE continue to complete Track ing Area Updates (TAU) cl ue to mob ili ty when in the ECM -CONNECTED state. i. e. when the UE
mo ves into a ce ll whi ch does not be long to a Track ing Area within the UE's li st of registered Tracking Areas
* UE make the transition from ECM -CONNECTED to ECM -ID LE when their signalling connecti on is re leased, or when their signalling
co nnecti on fail s
* 3GPP References: TS 23 .40 1. TS 24.30 1
33
LONG TERM EVOLUTION (LTE)
3GPP Release 8
Long Term Evolution (LTE) Carrier Aggregation for L TE Advanced
Repeaters for LTE 8x8 MIMO in the Downlink for LTE Advanced
HomeeNode B 4x4 MIMO in the Uplink for LTE Advanced
Inter Cell Interference Coordination (ICIC) Relays for LTE Advanced
SON - Self-Establishment of eNode B Enhanced Inter Cell Interference Coordination (ICIC)
SON - Automatic Neighbour Relations Minimisation of Drive Tests (MDT)
Enhanced Home eNode B Mobility
MBMS enhancements
3GPP Release 9 SON Enhancements
Local Area Base Stations for LTE
Enhanced Dual Layer Transmission
Enhanced Home eNode B
Positioning Support for LTE
MBMS Support
SON - Mobility Load Balancing
SON - Mobility Robustness Optimisation
SON- RACH Optimisation
SON - Energy Saving
34
IN BULLETS
the location of the serving cell with measurements such as timing advance and receive- transm it tim e differences at the UE and
eNode B
o Mu ltimedia Broadcast Mu lticast Services (MBMS) were in troduced . Some aspects of MBMS were already defined within the
release 8 ve rsion of the specifications, e.g. the PMCI-1 physical chann el was defined. However. complete support for MBMS was
prov ided by the re lease 9 version of the specification s. M BMS can be used to transmit down !ink video services to gro ups of UE
o the Mob ility Load Ba lanci ng component of SON was in trod uced . Mobility load ba lancing is used to tri gger handovers from
loaded cel ls towards less loaded cell s with the objective of maximi sing the overal l system capac ity. It can also be used to optimise
the handover parameter set
o the Mobil ity Robustness Optimi sati on co mponent of SON was introduced. This all ows the UE to report information regarding
rad io link fai lures. Thi s information can be sent to the cell at whi ch the rad io link fa il ure occurred and used to optimi se the
relevant param eter set
o the RACH Optimisation component of SON was introduced . Th is provides support for tuning the configu ration and resources
used by the random access procedure. The UE can be requested to report the number of preambles used to ga in access, and
whether or not contention was detected
o the Energy Savi ng component of SON was introduced . This all ows capacity layers to be placed in a do rm ant state to conserve
power consumption. Ne ighbouring eNode Bare informed of any action s to all ow handovers and neighbour li st manageme nt to be
handl ed appropri ate ly
* The release I0 version of the specificat ions introduces components of LTE Advanced . These are described in greater deta il in section
2.1 4. Overall. the following capabilities were introduced within the release I0 version of the 3GPP specifi cations:
o Carrier Aggregation all ows a single connection to use multiple RF carriers, known as Co mponent Carri ers. Signalling is defined to
support the aggregation of up to 5 Component Carri ers. RF capabi li ties are initiall y defin ed to sup port the aggregation of up to 2
Component Carriers prov iding an effective chann el bandwidth of up to 40 Ml-lz. Th is capab ili ty helps LTE Advanced to ac hie ve
both its peak and average throughput req uirements
o 8x8 MIMO in the down link al lows the tra nsmi ss ion of 8 parallel streams of data towards a sing le UE. Th is capabi lity helps LTE
Advanced to achieve its down link peak spectral effi ciency target, i.e. it increases the bits per second per Hz performance. This
comp lements the ex isting 4x4 MIMO, 2x2 MIMO, transm it di ve rsity and single antenna transmission schemes
o 4x4 MIMO in the uplink all ows the transm ission of 4 parallel streams of data towards an eN ode B. Thi s capabi li ty helps LTE
Advanced to ach ieve its upl ink peak spectral ef'flciency target, i.e. it increases the bits per second per Hz performance. The release
I0 version of the specifications also includes 2x2 MIMO in the upl ink. Prior to the release I 0 version of the spec ifications, on ly
single antenna tran smi ss ion was poss ible in the uplink
o Re lays are intended to provide ex tend ed LTE coverage and capac ity with relatively low cost. They difTer from Repeaters because
a Repeater simply re-tran smits the uplink and down lin k RF signals to extend the coverage of a donor ce ll. A Relay has its own
ce ll s and is able to decode messages before forwa rdin g them, i.e. a re lay has its own MAC, RLC. PDCP and RRC laye rs. The cells
provided by a Re lay ha ve their own Physical layer Ce ll Identities, Synchronisation Signals and Reference Signals
o Enhanced Inter Cell Interference Coordi nation (ICIC) bui lds upon the capabili ties of ICIC introduced within the release 8 ve rsion
of the specifications. The concept of Alm ost Blank Sub frames (ABS) is introduced to all ow eN ode to red uce their transmi ss ions
durin g certain time intervals. This helps to improve the signal to no ise ratio conditi ons for neighbouring eN ode B, but red uces the
total resources available for tran smi ssion
o Min im isation of Drive Tests (MDT) provides so lutions fo r recordi ng measurements from the UE perspective without the
requirement for relat ively expens ive and time consuming drive testing. Measurements are co llected from the population of
subscribers which have provided their consent. Measurements can target individua l UE. or groups of UE within a specific area.
' '::<;m '"'dl1s can be rc'H:l:.kd in !I P. C Idle mode or RRC Connected mode
o lnhanced Home cNode l3 mobility within the release 10 version of the specifications focuses upon mobility from one !lome
eN ode B to another Home eNodc 13. Thi s scenario is viewed as being particularly important fo r office envi ronments where
multiple Home eNode B may be used to provide coverage and capacity
o MBMS Enhancements prov ide additional capabilities such as UE counti ng to he lp opt imi se the tran smi ssion of down li nk services.
e.g. services can be di sabled if there are no UE. se nt using point-to-point tran smi ss ions if there is a sma ll numbe r ofUE. and sent
as broadcast transmi ss ions if there is an increased number of U E. All ocat ion and Retention Priority (ARP) fo r MBMS was also
introduced within the re lease 10 ve rsion of the spec ifications
o SON Enhancements define improvements for Mob il ity Robustness Opti mi sation and Mobility Load Ba lancing. In ter-system
support was added for Mobility Robustness Optimi sati on. wh ile inter-system support was enhanced for Mobility Load Ba lanc ing
35
LONG TERM EVOLUTION (LTE)
2.14 LTEADVANCED
* LTE Advanced is an evolved version of LTE with increased capabilities and improved performance. It is introduced within the release
I0 version of the 3GPP specification s, in contrast to LTE whi ch was introduced within the release 8 version of the specifications
* The requirements for LTE-Advanced are specified within 3GPP TR 36.9 13, whereas the original requirements for LTEare specifi ed
within 3GPP TR 25.913. The requirements for LTE-Advanced have been defined to satisfy the requirements of IMT-Advanced
specified by the Radiocommunications division of the Intern ational Telecommunication Un ion (ITU-R)
* Tab le 9 compares some of the key requirements for LTE-Advanced with those for LTE
* Peak throughput requirements for LTE Advanced are I 0 times greater than those for LTE. These improvements are fundamentally
ach ieved using a combination of increased bandwidth and increased multiple antenna transmission capab ility
o the maximum bandwidth of20 Ml-lz in LTE, evolves to a maximum bandwidth of up to I 00 MHz in LTE Advanced
o in the downlink direction, 4x4 MIMO in LTE evolves to 8x8 MIMO in LTE Advanced (although the I 00 Mbps peak throughput
requirement for LTE was based upon the assumption of2 rather than 4 receive antenna at the UE)
o in the uplink direction, single antenna transmission in LTE evolves to 4x4 MIMO in LTE Advanced
* Peak spectrum efficiency requirements for LTE Advanced are 6 times greater than those for LTE. Spectrum efficiency is a measure of
throughput per unit of bandwidth (measured in terms of bps/l-Iz) . Increasing throughput by simply increasing the quantity of spectrum
does not improve the spectrum efficiency. The spectrum efficiency requirements for LTE Advanced are primarily achieved using the
increased multiple antenna tran smission capability
* Average spectrum efficiency represents the total throughput of all users, divided by the total bandwidth, divided by the number of cells.
It is then expressed in units ofbps/1-I z/ce ll . 3GPP TR 36.913 spec ifies a range of average spectrum efficiency requirements for a range
of antenna configurations. The figures in Table 9 are applicable to 2x4 transmission in the uplink (2 transmit antenna at the UE and 4
receive antenna at the eN ode B), and to 4x4 transmission in the downlink. These figures are also specified to be appl icab le when using
a I 0 Ml-lz channel bandwidth and a 500 m inter-site distance
* In the case of LTE, the average spectrum efficiency requirements were not specified using absolute values, but were specified in terms
of a relative improvement when compared to the release 6 version of UMTS
o in the uplink direction, it was assumed that both UMTS and LTE used a single transm it antenna at the UE and 2 receive antenna at
the BTS. The uplink LTE average spectrum efficiency was then spec ified to be 2 to 3 times greater than the UMTS average
spectrum efficiency
o in the downlink direction, it was assumed that UMTS used a single transmit antenna at the Node B with 2 receive antenna at the
UE, while LTE used 2 tran smit anten na at the eN ode B wi th 2 rece ive ante nna at the UE. The downlink LTE ave rage spectrum
efficiency was then specifi ed to be 3 to 4 times greater than the UMTS average spectrum efficiency
The LTE average spectrum efficiency fi gures presented in Table 9 represent typical results which fit the req uirements defined by 3GPP
TR 25.913
* LTE Advanced is spec ified to have reduced control plane latencies re lati ve to LTE. Control plane latenc ies represent the delay in
moving the UE into a state where it is ready to transfer data with a user plane connection. Control plane latencies are defined for initial
cond iti ons of RRC Idle mode, and the Discontinuous Reception (DRX) substate of RRC Connected mode
* The user plane latency represents the one-way delay between the IP layer in the UE and the IP layer in the eNode B. The latency
requirement is applicable to both the uplink and downlink direction s so the effective round trip time requirement is< 10 ms. The user
plane latency for LTE Advanced was specified to be better than LTE but without defining a specific value
IN BULLETS
37
LONG TERM EVOLUTION (LTE)
* Other series of specificati ons also inclu de re levant information, e.g. TS 24.30 I specifi es the No n-Access Stratum (NAS) protocol
* A sampl e of the 3GPP specifications applicable to L TE is presented in Table I 0
* Versions are avai Iable for each release of the 3G PP specifications, e.g. releases 8, 9 and I 0