0% found this document useful (0 votes)
82 views9 pages

Solutions Practice Final

This document contains solutions to practice problems for a final exam covering complex analysis topics like holomorphic functions, the Cauchy-Riemann equations, Cauchy's integral formula, residues, and evaluating integrals using complex analysis techniques. The solutions demonstrate techniques like using generalized Cauchy's theorem to show a function is holomorphic, applying the Cauchy integral formula to evaluate derivatives, and using the residue theorem to evaluate contour integrals over circles.

Uploaded by

Nilesh Patil
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
82 views9 pages

Solutions Practice Final

This document contains solutions to practice problems for a final exam covering complex analysis topics like holomorphic functions, the Cauchy-Riemann equations, Cauchy's integral formula, residues, and evaluating integrals using complex analysis techniques. The solutions demonstrate techniques like using generalized Cauchy's theorem to show a function is holomorphic, applying the Cauchy integral formula to evaluate derivatives, and using the residue theorem to evaluate contour integrals over circles.

Uploaded by

Nilesh Patil
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

Solutions to practice problems for the final

Holomorphicity, Cauchy-Riemann equations, and Cauchy-Goursat theorem


1. (a) Show that there is a holomorphic function on = {z | |z| > 2} whose derivative is
z
.
(z 1)(z 2 + 1)

Hint. A holomorphic function has a primitive if the integral on any triangle in the domain
is zero.

Solution: Call the given function f (z). Consider a triangle in . Either it encloses
the circle |z| = 2 or it doesnt. In the latter case, f (z) is holomorphic in a neighborhood
of the triangle and so by Goursats theorem the integral of f over such a triangle is
zero. In case the triangle, which we denote by T , does enclose the circle |z| = 2, then
by generalized Cauchys theorem
Z Z
f (z) dz = f (z) dz,
T |z|=2

where the circle is given positive orientation. Since the given circle encloses all poles
of f (z) when thought of as a meromorphic function, again by generalized Cauchys
theorem, we see that for any R > 2,
Z Z
f (z) dz = f (z) dz.
|z|=2 |z|=R

But the latter integral goes to zero as you let R since the function grows like
1/R2 and the length of the circle grows like R. So the original integral must have
been zero. Hence in both cases integrals on triangles is zero. Hence there must exist
a primitive.
Remark. To show that the integral on |z| = 2, you could have also calculated the
residue at infinity, and shown that that residue is zero.

(b) Is there a holomorphic function on whose derivative is

z2
?
(z 1)(z 2 + 1)

1
Solution: No. If there was a primitive, then since the circle |z| = 3 lies in we would
have to have Z
f (z) = 0.
|z|=3

On the other hand the integral equals Resz= f (z) = Resz=0 f (1/z)/z 2 . But
1 1 1
Resz=0 f (1/z)/z 2 = lim z 2
f = lim = 1 6= 0.
z0 z z z0 (1 z)(1 + z 2 )

CIF, Cauchy-inequalities, Isolated singularities, Residue and argument theorems

2. If f is an entire function with


|f (z)| C(1 + |z|)1/2 ,
for all z C, then show that it is a constant.

Solution: Since f (z) is entire it is given by a power series that converges on the entire
complex plane to the function. We show that f n (0) = 0 for all n 1. This would show
that the the power series just a constant. By CIF, for any radius R > 1,
Z
(n) n! f (z)
f (0) = dz,
2i |z|=R z n+1

and so by the triangle inequality,

|f (z)|
Z
n!
|f (n) (0)| |dz|
2 |z|=R |z|n+1
n! (1 + R)1/2
C 2R. (Since on |z| = R, by given estimate, |f (z)| (1 + R)1/2 )
2 Rn+1
R R
2Cn! n 0,
R
as long as n 1. This completes the proof.

3. If f : D C is defined by
ew cos w
Z
1
f (z) = dw,
2i |w|=1 (w z)2
where the circle is given the positive orientation, evaluate f 0 (0).

Solution: By CIF, it is clear that


d z
f (z) = e cos z = ez cos z ez sin z.
dz

2
So f 0 (z) = 2ez sin z, and so f 0 (0) = 0.

4. Evaluate the integrals Z Z


tan z dz, (z /2) tan z dz,
|z|=2 |z|=2
where the circle is given the positive orientation.

Solution: The integral can be evaluated using the residue theorem since tan z is a mero-
morphic function with the only poles inside |z| = 2 being at z = /2 and z = /2. But
we evaluate it using the argument principle.

(cos z)0
tan z = sin z/ cos z = ,
cos z
and so
Z  
tan z = 2i number of zeroes of cos z inside |z| = 2 = 4i.
|z|=2

For the second integral, inside |z| = 2, the function has a simple pole only at z = /2.
But     
Resz=/2 z /2 tan z = lim z + /2 z /2 tan z = ,
z/2

and so the integral is 2 2 i.

5. Find the residue of f (z) = cot z at all of its poles.

Solution: The poles of cot z are at the zeroes of sin z, namely all the integers. The
poles are all simple, and so the residue is given by
cos z zn 1
Resz=n cot z = lim (z n) = cos n lim = ,
zn sin z zn sin z
where we used LHospitals rule in the last equation.

6. Find the integral of Z


x sin x
dx.
(x2 + 1)2

Solution: The required integral is the imaginary part of


R
xeix xeix
Z Z
I= dx = lim dx,
(x2 + 1)2 R R (x2 + 1)2

3
since the degree of the denominator is at least two more than the degree of the numerator.
The integral is of type III(a). So consider a contour made up of a large semi-circle of radius
R traversed in the anticlockwise direction (denoted by CR ) and a straight line path from
x = R to x = R along the x-axis, and the complex valued function

zeiz
f (z) = .
(z 2 + 1)2

The only pole of the function inside the contour is at z = i, and ordz=i f (z) = 2. By the
residue theorem,
R
xeix zeiz
Z Z
dx + dz = 2iResz=i f (z).
R (x2 + 1)2 CR (z 2 + 1)2

Letting R , the integral on the semicircle converges to zero, and so


d i
I = 2iResz=i f (z) = 2i (z i)2 f (z) = .
dz z=i 2e
So the integral that we want is the imaginary part of this, that is
Z
x sin x
2 + 1)2
dx = .
(x 2e

7. Evaluate

x2 + 1
Z
dx.
0 x4 + 1

Solution: This is standard of Type II. Since the integrand is even, the integral we need,
which we denote by I is
R
x2 + 1 x2 + 1
Z Z
1
I= dx = lim dx.
2 x4 + 1 R R x4 + 1

Again, using the same contour as above, since the degree of the denominator is two bigger
than the degree of numerator, the integral on the semi-circular will approach zero as R
and we obtain X
I = i Resz=p f (z),
p an interior pole

where
1 + z2
f (z) = .
1 + z4
The poles of the function are at k = ei/4+ik/2 , k = 0, 1, 2, 3. Since the contour is in the
upper half plane, the only poles in the interior of the contour are 0 = ei/4 and 1 = e3i/4 .

4
Since both poles are simple, the residues can be calculated using LHospitals rule, namely

(z k ) 2 1 + k2
Resz=k = lim (1 + z ) = .
zk 1 + z4 4k3

From this one can compute that


1
Resz=0 f (z) + Resz=1 f (z) = ,
i 2
and so

x2 + 1
Z

4
dx = I = .
0 x +1 2

Open mapping, max modulus, Rouches theorem, analytic continuation, sequences


etc.

8. Let {fn } be a sequence of entire functions that converges compactly to a f with f not identically
zero. If all fn have only real roots, show that all roots of f must be real.

Solution: This is a direct consequence of the generalized Hurwitzs theorem from the final
homework (Why?). We give a direct proof. Let p be a zero of f , whcih must be isolated.
Suppose p is not real. Let r > 0 such that Dr (p) does not contain any other root and does
not intersect the x-axis. Denoting the boundary circle by C, by the argument principle,

f 0 (z)
Z
1
dz 1,
2i C f (z)

since there is a root inside C, namely at p. But by compact convergence,

f 0 (z) fn0 (z)


Z Z
1 1
dz = lim dz.
2i C f (z) n 2i C fn (z)

But the integrals on the right are integers since they also count the number of zeroes of fn
inside C. But then there must exist an N large enough so that the integrals on the right
are greater than or equal to one for n > N . This is a contradiction since all roots of fn are
real and the real axis does not intersect Dr (p).

9. Suppose f (z) is holomorphic in an open set containing the closure of the unit disc {|z| < 1},
such that |f (z)| < 1 whenever |z| = 1. Show that the equation f (z) = z 3 has exactly three
solutions (counting multiplicities) inside the unit disc.

Solution: Rouches theorem! Let g(z) = z 3 , h(z) = z 3 f (z). Then on |z| = 1,

|h(z) g(z)| = |f (z)| < 1 = |z|3 = |g(z)|3 .

5
Hence h and g have same number of roots in |z| < 1 counting multiplicities, which is three.

10. Does there exist a holomorphic function on the unit disc D such that
(
1
1 , n is even
f = n1
n n+1 , n is odd?

Solution: No. Since f (1/2m) = 1/2m for natural numbers m, and since 1/2m 0
as m , by the principle of analytic continuation, f (z) = z. But his contradicts
f (1/(2m + 1)) = 1/(2m + 2).

11. Let f be holomorphic on a domain containing the closure of the unit disc, such that |f (z)| 5
for all |z| = 1. If f (0) = 3 + 4i, find f 0 (0).

Solution: We claim that f is constant, and hence f 0 (0) = 0. To see this, note that
|f (0)| = 5 |f (z)| for all |z| = 1. This contradicts the maximum principle unless f (z) is a
constant.

Conformal maps

12. Find a fractional linear transformation that maps the circle |z 1| = 1 onto the x-axis.

Solution: A circle is characterized by three points on it, which in this case, we can take
as z = 0, z = 2 and z = 1 + i. The x-axis is specified by w = 0, w = and w = 1. So the
required fractional linear transformation is
z i1
Tz = .
z2 i+1
Remark It is a good exercise in manipulating complex numbers and conjugates to show
that T z is purely real if |z 1| = 1. To see this note that |z 1| = 1 is equivalent to
|z|2 = z + z (Why?).

13. Give examples of biholomorphisms between


(a) {z | |z| < 1} and {z | Re(z) < 0}.

6
Solution: First map the disc to upper half plane by
1+z
zi ,
1z
and then rotate by /2. So
z+1
(z) =
z1

(b) {z | |z| < 1} to itself with f (0) = 0 and f (1/2) = i/2.

Solution: A biholomorphism of the unit disc that sends zero to zero is a rotation.
That is
f (z) = ei z.
But then = /2.

(c) {z | 0 < arg(z) < 3/2} and {z | 0 < arg(z) < /2}.

Solution: (z) = z 1/3 = elog z/3 , where we use the branch cut as the positive real axis
(that is, we restrict 0 < argz < 2).

(d) {z | |z| < 1, Im(z) > 0} and {z | |z| < 1}. Hint. Note that you cannot simply use z 2 .
Find a fractional linear transformation that will map the given region conformally onto
the first quadrant {z | Re(z) > 0, Im(z) > 0}.

Solution: The map


1+z
w=
1z
maps the upper half of the unit disc to the first quadrant. Then
 1 + z 2
=
1z
maps the domain to the upper half plane, and
i
=
+i
maps this to the unit disc. So the final map is

(1 + z)2 i(1 z)2


(z) = .
(1 + z)2 + i(1 z)2

7
Gamma and Zeta functions

14. (a) Use a change of variables to show that for all t > 0,
1 Z
=t evt (vt)1/2 dv.
2 0

(b) Show that


 1 2 Z dv
= .
2 0 v(1 + v)
Hint. Write Z
2
(1/2) = (1/2)(1/2) = et t1/2 (1/2) dt,
0
use part(a) for (1/2) on the right hand side, and integrate out the t.

(c) Use residue calculus to compute the integral on the right and conclude that (1/2) = .
(d) More generally, show that

(s)(1 s) = .
sin s
Hint. First prove the identity for s real and in the interval (0, 1), and then use analytic
continuation.

Solution: We will just prove the last part. Let us first assume that 0 < s < 1. Then
Z
(1 s) = ex xs dx.
0

For t > 0, consider the change of variables x = tv. Then dx = tdv and so
Z
(1 s) = t etv ts v s dv.
0

So
Z
(s)(1 s) = et ts1 (1 s) dt
Z0 Z
= et(v+1) v s dt dv
Z0 0 s
v
= dv.
0 v+1

In class we showed (Type IV integrals; integrating around branch cuts and residue theorem)
that Z s
v
dv = .
0 1+v sin s
Plugging in s = 1/2 gives
(1/2)2 = ,

and so (1/2) = .

8
Miscellaneous

15. If is connected, f : C is holomorphic, and ef is constant, show that f is itself constant.

Solution: 0 = (ef (z) )0 = f 0 (z)ef . Since ef is never zero, f 0 (z) = 0 on , and hence f is
constant.

16. If f (z) is an entire function such that |f (z)| as z , show that there exists a constant
c > 0 and R > 0 such that
|f (z)| > c|z|
for all |z| > R.

Solution: This directly follows from the fact that any entire function with a pole at infinity
is a non-constant polynomial. But we can give a direct proof. Since f (z) has a pole at
infinity, g(w) = f (1/w) has a pole at w = 0 of order M 1. In particular, there exists
c > 0 such that
c
|g(w)|
|w|m
c
for all |w| < r for some r > 0. We can choose r < 1 so that, |w|m < |w|, and so |g(w)| > |w|
on |w| < r. Or equivalently
1 c
f > ,
w |w|
for |w| < r. Putting z = 1/w, this is the same as saying

f (z) > c|z|

for |z| > 1/r. THe proof is complete by setting R = 1/r.

You might also like