Marina Eloi, Daniela Vargas Horvath, João Carlos Ortega, Monica Simon Prado, Luis Eduardo Coelho Andrade, Et Al
Marina Eloi, Daniela Vargas Horvath, João Carlos Ortega, Monica Simon Prado, Luis Eduardo Coelho Andrade, Et Al
Marina Eloi, Daniela Vargas Horvath, João Carlos Ortega, Monica Simon Prado, Luis Eduardo Coelho Andrade, Et Al
0170323
Journal Reading
Name : Rositha Ratna Wisesa
Moderator : Anna Tjandrawati
Day/date : Wednesday, May 17th 2016
Department of Clinical Pathology, Medical Faculty of Padjadjaran University / Dr. Hasan Sadikin
Hospital, Bandung
Introduction
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that can affect
almost any organ system. One possible explanation for the association between SLE and
vitamin D deficiency is the immunological abnormalities in SLE. The correlation between
high disease activity in SLE with low vitamin D serum concentrations has been reported, but
these results are controversial. The aim of this study is to assess the prevalence of vitamin D
deficiency in a cohort of patients with SLE and examine the association between total, free
and bioavailable vitamin D serum measurements with disease activity.
Methods
From 350 patients who attend at the Rheumatology Outpatient Clinics in period of time
February 2014 to January 2016, 199 were diagnosed with SLE according to the American
College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1997 classification criteria and met the inclusion criteria.
Anthropometric, demographic and clinical data collected from the electronic medical charts
or clinical interview included age, sex, race, weight, height, disease duration and medication
in use.
Blood samples were collected by intravenous puncture and serum aliquots were stored at
-80C for the biochemical analyses described below. The measurements of 25-(OH)D serum
were performed on a Siemens ADVIA Centaur apparatus using chemiluminescence
technique. Vitamin D binding protein (DBP) was measured by monoclonal antibody ELISA
(Cloud-Clone Corp. Kit-USCN Life Science Inc.) The coefficient of variation (CV%) for
DBP measurement is 4.8%.
For prospective analyses, quantitative variables were compared using ANOVA and
categorical variables were analyzed using Chi-square test with Bonferroni correction for
multiple comparisons. Statistical analyzes were performed using SPSS software version 17.0
(Chicago, IL) significance level was set as p< 0.05.
Results
The age of 199 SLE subjects were 37.2 11.1 years old (range 26 to 48 years old) and
mainly women (96%). Of those 142 subjects (71.4%) had 25(OH)D serum concentrations
below 30 ng/mL and significantly higher than that seen for healthy controls (p<0,001). Only
57 subjects (28.6%) had 25(OH)D serum concentrations exceeding 30 ng/mL (vitamin D
sufficiency). Vitamin D serum concentration was demonstrated a statistically significant
difference between inactive disease (SLEDAI = 0) or light activity (SLEDAI 15) and severe
activity (SLEDAI 20) (p<0.001; Tukey test).
The two groups (25(OH)D < 30 ng/mL versus 30 ng/mL) differ significantly in the propor-
tions of disease activity (p = 0.001). The proportion of patients with vitamin D sufficiency
(25(OH)D 30 ng/mL) is significantly higher in the groups SLEDAI 0 and 15 when
compared to 25(OH)D values below 30 ng/mL (p= 0.003). In patients with severe activity
(SLEDAI 20), the proportion of patients with 25 (OH)D serum concentration lower than 30
ng/mL was significantly higher as compared to values 30 ng/mL (p= 0.026).
The Potential associations between vitamin D status and season, body mass index (BMI),
Bone Mineral Density (BMD) and use of medication were also tested. There was no
statistically significant difference in the mean serum concentrations of 25(OH)D (p= 0.179),
free and bioavailable vitamin D (p= 0.041) between the different seasons. The concentration
of 25(OH)D serum were not significantly associated with the disease duration or BMI. Both
free and bioavailable vitamin D was also not associated with those variables.
Discussion
This study observed a very high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency
among SLE patients. Only 28.6% of the patients were vitamin D sufficient (serum 25(OH)D
30 ng/mL). Vitamin D deficiency was significantly more frequent in SLE patients than in
healthy controls. They have also found that disease activity in SLE was associated with lower
25(OH)D serum concentration. On the other hand, measuring DBP with a monoclonal ELISA
in this clinical setting has not added information to the status of vitamin D: both free and
bioavailable fractions of 25(OH)D did not differ between the various categories of SLE
disease activity.
It was recently demonstrated that DBP measurements using monoclonal ELISA are biased
by DBP genotype and race. Vitamin D binding protein values varied significantly when
measured by monoclonal or polyclonal ELISA or tandem mass spectrometry and that had
implication on free and bioavailable vitamin D calculations. Vitamin D supplementation was
associated with increased 25(OH)D serum concentrations. About 35% of patients using
cholecalciferol 400 to 1000 IU/day do not seem to be sufficient to ensure adequate levels of
vitamin D and still presented vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency in these patients.
Conclusion
This study have demonstrated a very high frequency of vitamin D deficiency and
insufficiency among patients with SLE. In this clinical setting, the disease activity was
associated with lower serum concentrations of 25(OH)D. Vitamin D binding protein
measurements with monoclonal ELISA and free and bioavailable vitamin D calculations did
not differ among different categories of SLE disease activity.