Biomass Torrefaction As A Preprocessing Step For Thermal Conversion - Evergreen
Biomass Torrefaction As A Preprocessing Step For Thermal Conversion - Evergreen
Biomass Torrefaction As A Preprocessing Step For Thermal Conversion - Evergreen
There have been many studies to identify biomass sources and quantities in the United States.
These studies have shown there is at least one billion tons of biomass available for conversion.
What is not taken into account is the logistics of aggregating and transporting the biomass to the
processing locations. These aggregating and transporting costs are high enough to make a
significant portion of the biomass uneconomical to utilize for conversion. In addition to these
costs there are inherent problems with most types of biomass. This paper will address some of
the major challenges with biomass and how torrefaction can help to improve the feedstock and
reduce the costs associated with biomass aggregation and transportation.
Biomass Challenges
There are a number of quality and logistical challenges which biomass sources have in common.
Foreign debris is common among many types of biomass. Forest waste has a large content of
residual dirt. Construction waste and MSW (Municipal Solid Waste) include metal items, glass,
plastics, and other materials which can damage equipment and release harmful chemicals when
burned. Feedstock sources must have the foreign materials separated out before the conversion
process to prevent damage.
Inconsistent moisture is also prevalent in biomass feedstock. Unprocessed forest residue and
urban wood waste may have 20%-50+% moisture depending on time left to dry and moisture in
location. MSW also has a wide range of moisture content just because of the inconsistent nature
of the feedstock. Ag residue moisture also varies depending on the type of biomass and time of
harvest. Moisture variation in the feedstock requires adjustments to the conversion process.
These adjustments reduce the efficiency of the process and increase costs.
Biomass typically degrades over time due to natural decomposition. Biomass does not store well
without careful protection. Biomass is prone to natural decomposition and breakdown with
exposure to moisture, pests, and other environmental conditions. The high moisture content of
some sources of biomass naturally accelerates the decomposition process.
Biomass is bulky. The density of baled ag waste, collected wood residue, or MSW often fill the
transport container before it reaches the maximum weight. Since the transportation containers
could carry more if the biomass had a higher density densification would result in lower
transportation costs.
Biomass generally requires pre-processing before conversion into other products. Biomass can
rarely be used in the conversion process without a reduction (grinding) operation to make a
consistent particle size. This pre-processing provides a consistent material so complete
conversion can take place. Inconsistent biomass size cause un-reacted materials to pass through
the conversion process and reduce efficiency.
Biomass is not as efficient to collect and transport as other feedstocks. Grains, coal, oil, and
natural gas all have well developed and efficient collection and transportation systems. Biomass
collection and transportation costs are much higher because the material is typically batch loaded
and unloaded. Other developed feedstock sources have high speed continuous flow loading and
unloading systems.
These biomass challenges are not insurmountable. Minimizing the effects and costs associated
with these challenges results in a more economical feedstock supply.
GJ/m3(1). The pelletized material can also be moved like coal or grain with existing handling
systems and hopper bottom containers.
Torrefaction produces a material that is free from foreign materials with consistent moisture.
The torrefied material also has a higher energy content and density. The material is also resistant
to decomposition and pelletized material transports using common grain handling equipment.
These factors can reduce the logistics costs by over 50% (2) while also improving economics for
thermal conversion. The resulting material can also be burned in existing coal fired or wood
pellet systems without modification.
References
(1) Patrick .C.A. Bergman and Jacob H.A. Kiel, Torrefaction for Biomass Upgrading
Energy research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN), Unit ECN Biomass
ECN Report: ECN-RX--05-180
(2) CheckBiotech www.checkbiotech.org Torrefaction gives biomass a 20% energy boost,
makes logistics far more efficient Friday, July 25, 2008