Reviewer Succession
Reviewer Succession
Reviewer Succession
53
SUCCESSION
SUCCESSION NOTE: The distinctions between
A mode of acquisition by virtue heirs and devisees/legatees are
of which the property, rights and significant in these cases:
obligations to the extent of the 1. Preterition (pretermission)
value of the inheritance, of a 2. Imperfect disinheritance
person are transmitted through 3. After-acquired properties
his death to another or others 4. Acceptance or non-
either by his will or by operation repudiation of the
of law. (Art. 774) successional rights.
NOTE: A witness need not know the NOTE: In the case of Kalaw vs. Relova
contents of the will, and need not be (134 SCRA 241), the holographic will in
shown to have had a good standing in the dispute had only one substantial
community where he lives. Also, the provision, which was altered by
acknowledging notary public cannot be substituting the original heir with
one of the 3 minimum numbers of another, but which alteration did not
witnesses. carry the requisite of full authentication
Interested witness by the full signature of the testator, the
A witness to a will who is effect must be that the entire will is
voided or revoked for the simple reason
incapacitated from succeeding from
that nothing remains in the will after
the testator by reason of a
that which could remain valid.
devise/legacy or other testamentary
disposition therein in his favor, or in
Effects of words written by another
favor of his spouse, parent, or child.
and inserted in the words written by
However, his competence as a
the testator:
witness subsists.
a. If the insertion was made after the
execution of the will, but without
2. HOLOGRAPHIC WILL (Article 810)
the consent of the testator, such
a. entirely written by the hand of
insertion is considered as not
the testator;
written, because the validity of the
b. entirely dated by the hand of
will cannot be defeated by the
the testator; and
malice or caprice of third person.
c. entirely signed by the hand of
b. If the insertion after the execution
the testator.
of the will was with the consent of
the testator, the will remains valid
NOTE: The law exacts literal but the insertion is void.
compliance with these requirements. c. If the insertion after the execution is
HENCE, THE DOCTRINE OF LIBERAL validated by the testator by his
INTERPRETATION CANNOT BE APPLIED. signature thereon, then the insertion
becomes part of the will, and the
Nevertheless, the Court held in a entire will becomes void, because
case that as a general rule, the of failure to comply with the
date in a holographic will should requirement that it must be wholly
include the day, month, and year of written by the testator.
its execution. However, when there d. If the insertion made by a third
is no appearance of fraud, bad faith, person is made contemporaneous to
undue influence and pressure and the execution of the will, then the
the authenticity of the will is will is void because it is not written
established and the only issue is entirely by the testator.
whether or not the date FEB./61
appearing on the will is a valid Probate of Holographic Will
compliance with Art. 810, probate of 1. If UNCONTESTED, requires that at
the holographic will should be least 1 witness who knows the
allowed under the principle of handwriting and signature of the
substantial compliance. (In the testator explicitly declare that the
matter of Intestate Estate of Andres will and signature are in the
CIVIL LAW COMMITTEE
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
San Beda College of Law
60
In Nuguid vs Nuguid (17 SCRA 449), Grounds for Disallowance of a Will (ART
the Supreme Court held that, if the 839)
case were to be remanded for 1. Formalities required by law have not
probate of the will, nothing will be been complied with;
gained. On the contrary, this 2. Testator was insane, or otherwise
litigation would be protracted. And incapable of making a will, at the
for aught that appears in the record, time of its execution;
in the event of probate or if the 3. Will was executed through force or
court rejects the will, probability under duress, or the influence of
exists that the case will come up fear, or threats;
once again before us on the same 4. Will was procured by undue and
issue of the intrinsic validity or improper pressure and influence, on
nullity of the will. RESULT: waste of the part of the beneficiary or of
time, effort, expense, plus added some other person;
anxiety. 5. Signature of the testator was
procured by fraud;
In Nepomuceno vs CA (139 SCRA 6. Testator acted by mistake or did not
207), the Court ruled that the court intend that the instrument he signed
can inquire as to the intrinsic should be his will at the time of
validity of the will because there affixing his signature thereto.
was an express statement that the NOTE: GROUNDS ARE EXCLUSIVE.
beneficiary was a mistress.
NOTES:
Criminal action will not lie against Fair arguments, persuasion, appeal
the forger of a will which had been to emotions, and entreaties which,
duly admitted to probate by a court without fraud or deceit or actual
of competent jurisdiction. (Mercado coercion, compulsion or restraint do
vs. Santos 66 Phil. 215) not constitute undue influence
sufficient to invalidate a will.
The fact that the will has been (Barreto vs. Reyes 98 Phil 996)
allowed without opposition and the Burden is on the person challenging
order allowing the same has become the will to show that such influence
final and executory is not a bar to was exerted at the time of its
the presentation of a codicil, execution.
provided it complies with all the To make a case of UNDUE
formalities for executing a will. It is INFLUENCE, the free agency of the
not necessary that the will and testator must be shown to have been
codicil be probated together as the destroyed; but to establish a ground
codicil may be concealed by an of contest based on FRAUD, free
interested party. They may be agency of the testator need not be
probated one after the other. shown to have been destroyed.
(Macam vs. Gatmaitan 60 Phil 358) Allegations of fraud and undue
influence are mutually repugnant
When a will is declared void because and exclude each other; their joining
it has not been executed in as grounds for opposing probate
accordance with the formalities shows absence of definite evidence
required by law, but one of the against the validity of the will
intestate heirs, after the settlement (Icasiano vs. Icasiano 11 SCRA 422)
of the debts of the deceased, pays a
legacy in compliance with a clause in REVOCATION DISALLOWANCE
the language of the will. Otherwise, it is the testator or of any other person
not binding. shall be void (disposicion
captatoria).
LIMITATIONS: 6. Conditions imposed by the testator
1. The testator cannot impose any upon the heirs shall be governed by
charge, burden, encumbrance, the rules established for conditional
condition, or substitution obligations in all matters not
whatsoever upon the legitime of provided for by the law on
compulsory heirs. succession.
2. Impossible conditions and those
contrary to law or good customs are Kinds of Conditions
presumed to have been imposed 1. Potestative Condition depends
erroneously or through oversight, exclusively upon the will of the heir,
thus, are considered as not imposed. devisee, or legatee, and must be
3. An absolute condition not to performed by him personally.
contract a first marriage is always 2. Causal Condition depends upon the
void and will be considered as not will of the heir, devisee, or legatee,
written. but upon the will of a third person.
4. An absolute condition not to 3. Mixed depends jointly upon the will
contract a subsequent marriage is of the heir, devisee, or legatee and
generally void, unless imposed upon upon chance and/or will of a third
a widow or widower by the deceased person.
spouse or by the latters ascendants
or descendants. Even so, however, Fulfillment of Conditions:
the legitime of the surviving spouse 1. Potestative Conditions must be
cannot be impaired. fulfilled after the death of the
testator (except when it has already
An absolute condition not to been fulfilled and is of such nature
contract marriage when validly that it cannot be repeated);
imposed is resolutory in character. 2. Causal or mixed conditions may be
Consequently, if the testator fulfilled either before or after such
institutes his wife as heir subject to death, unless the testator has
the condition that she will never provided otherwise.
marry again, she immediately
acquires a right to the inheritance
upon the death of testator, but if she
violates the condition by contracting MODAL INSTITUTION (INSTITUCION SUB
a 2nd marriage, she loses her right to MODO)
said inheritance. Attachment by the testator to an
institution of heir, or to a devise or
NOTE: However, the following relative legacy, of a statement of the:
conditions regarding marriage have been a. object of the institution;
considered as valid and binding: b. application of the property left
a. generic condition to contract by testator; or
marriage; c. charge imposed by him.
b. specific condition to contract
marriage with a determinate NOTES:
person; and When in doubt as to whether there is
c. specific condition not to a condition or merely a mode,
contract marriage with a consider the same as mode.
determinate person. When in doubt as to whether there is
a mode or merely a suggestion,
5. Any disposition made upon the
consider same only as a suggestion.
condition that the heir shall make
some provisions in his will in favor of
CIVIL LAW COMMITTEE
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
San Beda College of Law
69
The condition suspends but does disposable free portion is that which
not obligate; the mode obligates remains after the legitime has been
but does not suspend (for he who covered.
inherits with a mode is already an
heir; one who inherits conditionally COMPULSORY HEIRS (CH)
is not yet an heir) Those for whom the legitime is
reserved by law, and who succeed
DOCTRINE of CONSTRUCTIVE whether the testator likes it or not.
FULFILLMENT: When without the fault They cannot be deprived by the
of the fault of the heir, an institucion testator of their legitime except by
sub modo cannot take effect in the disinheritance properly effected.
exact manner stated by the testator, it
shall be complied with in a manner most Kinds of Compulsory Heirs:
analogous to and in conformity with his 1. Primary those who have
wishes. precedence over and exclude other
CH. E.g. LCD.
NOTE: 2. Secondary those who succeed only
If the condition is casual, the in the absence of the primary CH.
E.g. LPA or IP.
doctrine is not applicable since the
3. Concurring those who succeed
fulfillment of the event which
together with the primary or
constitutes the condition is
secondary CH. E.g. ICD and SS.
independent of the will of the heir,
devisee/legatee. If the condition is
potestative or mixed, the doctrine is If the testator is If the testator is
applicable. a LEGITIMATE an ILLEGITIMATE
person person
L. LEGITIMES (ARTS 886 914)
LEGITIME 1. Legitimate 1. Legitimate
children and children and
That part of the testators property
descendants descendants
which he cannot dispose of because (LCD) (LCD)
the law has reserved it for certain
heirs who are, therefore, called 2. In default of 2. Illegitimate
compulsory heirs. the foregoing, children and
legitimate descendants
parents and (ICD)
ascendants
(LPA)
The course of action to enforce a
3. Surviving 3. In default of
legitime accrues upon the death of spouse (SS) the foregoing,
the donor-decedent since it is only illegitimate
then that the net estate may be parents only
ascertained and on which basis, the (IP)
legitime may be determined.
(Imperial vs. CA 316 SCRA 313) 4. Illegitimate 4. Surviving
children and spouse (SS)
NOTE: One half of the estate is always descendants
reserved for the primary or secondary (ICD)
compulsory heirs. The other half is what
is termed under the NCC as the free NOTES:
portion from which the legitime of the See Sections 17 & 18 of R.A. 8552.
concurring compulsory heirs are taken. By force of the Family Code,
This free portion is different from the adopted children are deemed
disposable free portion over which the legitimate children of the adopters.
testator has testamentary control. The
CIVIL LAW COMMITTEE
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
San Beda College of Law
70
Requisites:
1. Effected only through a valid will;
IMPERFECT PRETERITION
2. For a cause expressly stated by law;
DISINHERITANCE
3. Cause must be stated in the will
itself; 1. The person 1. The person
4. Cause must be certain and true; disinherited may be omitted must be a
5. Unconditional; any compulsory heir compulsory heir in
6. Total; and the direct line
2. Parents/Ascendants:
a. When the parents have NOTES:
abandoned their children or Mere civility which may characterize
induced their daughters to live a their relationship, a conduct that is
corrupt or immoral life, or
attempted against their virtue;
CIVIL LAW COMMITTEE
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
San Beda College of Law
75
4. Other causes: nullity of the will; does not apply, the rules on Intestate
noncompliance with suspensive succession shall take over.
conditions affecting the bequests;
sale of the thing to pay the debts of A. RULES
the deceased during the settlement 1. Rule of Preference between lines
of his estate. Those in the direct descending
line shall exclude those in the
NOTE: LIST IS NOT EXCLUSIVE direct ascending and collateral
lines, and those in the direct
II. LEGAL OR INTESTATE ascending line shall, in turn,
SUCCESSION exclude those in the collateral
line.
2. Rule of Proximity
That which is effected by operation
The relative nearest in degree
of law in the absence or default of a
excludes the more distant ones,
will.
saving the right of
representation when it properly
CAUSES OF INTESTACY takes place.
1. If a person dies without a will, or This rule is subject to the rule of
with a void will, or one which has preference between lines.
subsequently lost its validity; 3. Rule of Equal Division
2. Absence of an institution of heir; Relatives in the same degree
3. Partial institution of heir. In such shall inherit in equal shares.
case, intestacy takes place as to the EXCEPTIONS:
undisposed portion (mixed
a) Division in the ascending line
succession);
(between paternal and maternal
4. Non-fulfillment of suspensive
grandparents);
condition attached to the institution
b) Division among brothers and
of heir;
sisters, some of whom are of the
5. Predecease of the instituted heir;
full and others of half blood; and
6. Repudiation by the instituted heir;
c) Division In cases where the right
7. Incapacity of instituted heir;
of representation takes place.
8. Preterition. Intestacy may be total
NOTE: This rule is subject to the
or partial depending on whether or
rule of preference between lines.
not there are legacies/devises;
4. Rule of Barrier between the
9. Fulfillment of resolutory condition;
legitimate family and the
10. Expiration of term or period of
illegitimate family
institution;
The illegitimate family cannot
11. Non-compliance or impossibility of
compliance with the will. inherit by intestate succession
from the legitimate family and
NOTE: In all cases where there has been vice-versa.
5. Rule of Double Share for full blood
an institution of heir, follow the
I.S.R.A.I. order of Justice Paras. If the collaterals
Institution fails, Substitution occurs. If When full and half-blood
there is no substitute, the right of brothers or sisters, nephews or
Representation applies in the direct nieces, survive, the full blood
descending line to the legitime if the shall take a portion in the
vacancy is caused by predecease, inheritance double that of the
incapacity, or disinheritance. The right half-blood.
of Accretion applies to the free portion
when the requisites in Art. 1016 are NOTE: In case of a disposition made in
present. If there is no substitute, and general terms under Article 959, only the
the right of Representation or Accretion Rule of Proximity applies.
3. The intestate shares are either equal that they are entitled to receive
to or greater than the legitime. from such disposable free portion as
4. GENERAL RULE: Grandchildren intestate heirs.
always inherit by RR, provided 3. If the intestate share of a
representation is proper. compulsory heir is equal to his
EXCEPTION: Whenever all the legitime, then the amount of the
children repudiate, the testamentary disposition must be
grandchildren inherit in their own deducted only from the intestate
right because RR would not be shares of the others, in the
proper. proportions stated above.
5. Nephews and nieces inherit either by 4. If the testamentary dispositions
RR or in their Own Right (OR). consume the entire disposable free
a. RR: when they concur with aunts portion, then the intestate heirs who
and uncles (provided that RR is are compulsory heirs will get only
proper) their legitime, and those who are
not compulsory heirs will get
nothing.
3. When renunciation is in favor of all the legitime of each heir, and in the
heirs indiscriminately for account of partition. (Art. 1061)
consideration An act of returning or restoring to
4. Other acts of tacit acceptance the common mass of the estate,
a. heir demands partition of the either actually or fictitiously, any
inheritance property which a person may have
b. heir alienates some objects of received from the decedent during
the inheritance the latters lifetime, but which is
c. Under Art 1057, failure to signify understood for legal purposes as an
acceptance or repudiation within advance from inheritance.
30 days after an order of
distribution by the probate OPERATIONS RELATED TO COLLATION
court. 1. Collation adding to the mass of the
hereditary estate the value of the
REPUDIATION must be made in a donation or gratuitous disposition
public instrument (acknowledged 2. Imputing or Charging crediting the
before a notary public) or authentic donation as an advance on the
document (equivalent of an legitime (if the donee is a
indubitable writing or a writing compulsory heir) or on the free
whose authenticity is admitted or portion (if the donee is a stranger)
proved) or by petition presented to 3. Reduction determining to what
the court having jurisdiction over the extent the donation will remain and
testamentary or intestate to what extent it is excessive or
proceeding. inofficious.
4. Restitution return or payment of
the excess to the mass of hereditary
estate.
Reason for formality: Law considers
that the act of repudiation is more
Persons obliged to collate
solemn than the act of acceptance
1. GENERAL RULE: compulsory heirs
and that repudiation produces a
more violent and disturbing EXCEPTIONS:
consequences. a. When the testator should have
so expressly provided; and
b. When the compulsory heir should
Heir in two capacities: An heir who
have repudiated his inheritance
is such by will and by law, and he 2. Grandchildren who survive with their
repudiates the inheritance as a uncles, aunts, or 1st cousins, and
testamentary heir, will be considered inherit by right of representation.
to have repudiated the inheritance
as a legal heir. But when an heir NOTE: Grandchildren may inherit from
repudiates as a legal heir, he may grandparent in their own right (i.e. heirs
later on accept as a testamentary next in degree) and not by right of
heir. representation if their parent repudiates
the inheritance of the grandparent, as
D. COLLATION (ARTS. 1061-1077) no living person can be represented
Every compulsory heir, who succeeds except in cases of disinheritance and
with other compulsory heirs must incapacity. In such case grandchildren
bring into the mass of the estate any are not obliged to bring to collation
property or right which he may what their parent has received
received from the decedent, during gratuitously from their grandparent)
the lifetime of the latter, by way of
donation, or any other gratuitous What to collate:
title, in order that it may be
computed in the determination of
CIVIL LAW COMMITTEE
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma.
Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease),
John Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony
Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
San Beda College of Law
84
and
2. If the beneficiaries in the void will
were legal heirs.