Tugas Spread Spectrum
Tugas Spread Spectrum
KOMUNIKASI DATA
SPREADING SPECTRUM
signal (e.g., an electrical, electromagnetic, or acoustic signal) generated with a particular bandwidth is
deliberately spread in the frequency domain, resulting in a signal with a wider bandwidth. These
techniques are used for a variety of reasons, including the establishment of secure communications,
increasing resistance to natural interference, noise and jamming, to prevent detection, and to limit
larger than the frequency content of the original information. Frequency hopping is a basic modulation
frequency hopping, or a hybrid of these, which can be used for multiple access and/or multiple
functions. This technique decreases the potential interference to other receivers while achieving
privacy. Spread spectrum generally makes use of a sequential noise-like signal structure to spread the
normally narrowband information signal over a relatively wideband (radio) band of frequencies. The
receiver correlates the received signals to retrieve the original information signal. Originally there were
two motivations: either to resist enemy efforts to jam the communications (anti-jam, or AJ), or to hide
the fact that communication was even taking place, sometimes called low probability of intercept
(LPI).
spread spectrum (THSS), chirp spread spectrum (CSS), and combinations of these techniques are forms
of spread spectrum. Each of these techniques employs pseudorandom number sequences created
using pseudorandom number generators to determine and control the spreading pattern of the signal
across the allocated bandwidth. Ultra-wideband (UWB) is another modulation technique that
accomplishes the same purpose, based on transmitting short duration pulses. Wireless standard IEEE
Techniques known since the 1940s and used in military communication systems since the 1950s
"spread" a radio signal over a wide frequency range several magnitudes higher than minimum
requirement. The core principle of spread spectrum is the use of noise-like carrier waves, and, as the
name implies, bandwidths much wider than that required for simple point-to-point communication at
systems, narrowband jamming affects detection performance about as much as if the amount of
jamming power is spread over the whole signal bandwidth, when it will often not be much stronger
than background noise. By contrast, in narrowband systems where the signal bandwidth is low, the
received signal quality will be severely lowered if the jamming power happens to be concentrated on
Resistance to eavesdropping. The spreading code (in DS systems) or the frequency-hopping pattern (in
FH systems) is often unknown by anyone for whom the signal is unintended, in which case it obscures
the signal and reduces the chance of an adversary's making sense of it. Moreover, for a given noise
power spectral density (PSD), spread-spectrum systems require the same amount of energy per bit
before spreading as narrowband systems and therefore the same amount of power if the bitrate before
spreading is the same, but since the signal power is spread over a large bandwidth, the signal PSD is
much lower often significantly lower than the noise PSD so that the adversary may be unable to
determine whether the signal exists at all. However, for mission-critical applications, particularly those
employing commercially available radios, spread-spectrum radios do not intrinsically provide adequate
security; "...just using spread-spectrum radio itself is not sufficient for communications security".[1]
Resistance to fading. The high bandwidth occupied by spread-spectrum signals offer some frequency
diversity, i.e. it is unlikely that the signal will encounter severe multipath fading over its whole
bandwidth, and in other cases the signal can be detected using e.g. a Rake receiver.
multiplexing (CDM). Multiple users can transmit simultaneously in the same frequency band as long as
Spread-spectrum clock generation (SSCG) is used in some synchronous digital systems, especially
those containing microprocessors, to reduce the spectral density of the electromagnetic interference
(EMI) that these systems generate. A synchronous digital system is one that is driven by a clock signal
and, because of its periodic nature, has an unavoidably narrow frequency spectrum. In fact, a perfect
clock signal would have all its energy concentrated at a single frequency (the desired clock frequency)
and its harmonics. Practical synchronous digital systems radiate electromagnetic energy on a number of
narrow bands spread on the clock frequency and its harmonics, resulting in a frequency spectrum that,
at certain frequencies, can exceed the regulatory limits for electromagnetic interference (e.g. those of
the FCC in the United States, JEITA in Japan and the IEC in Europe).
Spread-spectrum clocking avoids this problem by using one of the methods previously described to
reduce the peak radiated energy and, therefore, its electromagnetic emissions and so comply with
equipment modification. It is even more popular in portable electronics devices because of faster clock
speeds and increasing integration of high-resolution LCD displays into ever smaller devices. Since
these devices are designed to be lightweight and inexpensive, traditional passive, electronic measures
to reduce EMI, such as capacitors or metal shielding, are not viable. Active EMI reduction techniques
However, spread-spectrum clocking, like other kinds of dynamic frequency change, can also create
challenges for designers. Principal among these is clock/data misalignment, or clock skew.
Note that this method does not reduce total radiated energy, and therefore systems are not necessarily
less likely to cause interference. Spreading energy over a larger bandwidth effectively reduces
electrical and magnetic readings within narrow bandwidths. Typical measuring receivers used by EMC
testing laboratories divide the electromagnetic spectrum into frequency bands approximately 120 kHz
wide.[6] If the system under test were to radiate all its energy in a narrow bandwidth, it would register
a large peak. Distributing this same energy into a larger bandwidth prevents systems from putting
enough energy into any one narrowband to exceed the statutory limits. The usefulness of this method as
a means to reduce real-life interference problems is often debated, since it is perceived that spread-
spectrum clocking hides rather than resolves higher radiated energy issues by simple exploitation of
loopholes in EMC legislation or certification procedures. This situation results in electronic equipment
sensitive to narrow bandwidth(s) experiencing much less interference, while those with broadband
sensitivity, or even operated at other higher frequencies (such as a radio receiver tuned to a different
reduce the measured emissions to within acceptable legal limits. However, the spread-spectrum
functionality may be disabled by the user in some cases. As an example, in the area of personal
computers, some BIOS writers include the ability to disable spread-spectrum clock generation as a user
setting, thereby defeating the object of the EMI regulations. This might be considered a loophole, but is
overclocking, as spread spectrum can lower maximum clock speed achievable due to clock skew.
A conventional wireless signal has a frequency, usually specified in megahertz (MHz) or gigahertz
gigahertz), that does not change with time (except for small, rapid fluctuations that occur as a result of
modulation). When you listen to a signal at 103.1 MHz on an FM stereo receiver, for example, the
signal stays at 103.1 MHz. It does not go up to 105.1 MHz or down to 99.1 MHz. The digits on the
radio's frequency dial stay the same at all times. The frequency of a conventional wireless signal is kept
as constant as the state of the art will permit, so the bandwidth can be kept within certain limits, and so
the signal can be easily located by someone who wants to retrieve the information.
There are at least two problems with conventional wireless communications that can occur under
certain circumstances. First, a signal whose frequency is constant is subject to catastrophic interference.
This occurs when another signal is transmitted on, or very near, the frequency of the desired signal.
deliberate (as in wartime). Second, a constant-frequency signal is easy to intercept, and is therefore not
well suited to applications in which information must be kept confidential between the source
To minimize troubles that can arise from the above mentioned vulnerabilities of conventional
communications circuits, the frequency of the transmitted signal can be deliberately varied over a
comparatively large segment of the electromagnetic radiation spectrum. This variation is done
according to a specific, but complicated mathematical function. In order to intercept the signal, a
receiver must be tuned to frequencies that vary precisely according to this function. The receiver must
"know" the frequency-versus-time function employed by the transmitter, and must also "know" the
starting-time point at which the function begins. If someone wants to jam a spread-spectrum signal,
that person must have a transmitter that "knows" the function and its starting-time point. The spread-
spectrum function must be kept out of the hands of unauthorized people or entities.
Most spread-spectrum signals use a digital scheme called frequency hopping. The transmitter
frequency changes abruptly, many times each second. Between "hops," the transmitter frequency is
stable. The length of time that the transmitter remains on a given frequency between "hops" is known
as the dwell time. A few spread-spectrum circuits employ continuous frequency variation, which is an
analog scheme.
Sumber : http://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/definition/spread-spectrum
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spread_spectrum