Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 89 views

    Glogster Rubric

    Uploaded by

    kuhnedu505
    The document provides a rubric for evaluating food chain Glogster posters with categories for required elements, knowledge gained, use of class time, attractiveness, graphics, and grammar/mechanics. Each category is scored on a scale from 1-4, with 4 being "Excellent" and including all required elements as well as additional information for the poster. A score of 3 is "Good" and meets most requirements, while a 2 means "Needs Improvement" with some missing elements or issues. A score of 1 is "Poor" with several missing elements or other significant flaws.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Glogster Rubric

    Uploaded by

    kuhnedu505
    89 views2 pages
    The document provides a rubric for evaluating food chain Glogster posters with categories for required elements, knowledge gained, use of class time, attractiveness, graphics, and grammar/mechanics. Each category is scored on a scale from 1-4, with 4 being "Excellent" and including all required elements as well as additional information for the poster. A score of 3 is "Good" and meets most requirements, while a 2 means "Needs Improvement" with some missing elements or issues. A score of 1 is "Poor" with several missing elements or other significant flaws.

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document provides a rubric for evaluating food chain Glogster posters with categories for required elements, knowledge gained, use of class time, attractiveness, graphics, and grammar/mechanics. Each category is scored on a scale from 1-4, with 4 being "Excellent" and including all required elements as well as additional information for the poster. A score of 3 is "Good" and meets most requirements, while a 2 means "Needs Improvement" with some missing elements or issues. A score of 1 is "Poor" with several missing elements or other significant flaws.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    89 views2 pages

    Glogster Rubric

    Uploaded by

    kuhnedu505
    The document provides a rubric for evaluating food chain Glogster posters with categories for required elements, knowledge gained, use of class time, attractiveness, graphics, and grammar/mechanics. Each category is scored on a scale from 1-4, with 4 being "Excellent" and including all required elements as well as additional information for the poster. A score of 3 is "Good" and meets most requirements, while a 2 means "Needs Improvement" with some missing elements or issues. A score of 1 is "Poor" with several missing elements or other significant flaws.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    Making A Poster : Food Chain Glogster Poster

    Teacher Name: Ms. Kuhn

    Student Name: ____________________________________________________________________

    CATEGORY 4 (Excellent) 3 (Good) 2 (Needs Improvement) 1 (Poor)

    Required Elements The poster includes All required All but 1 of the required Several required
    all required elements are elements are included on elements were
    elements as well as included on the the poster. missing.
    additional poster.
    information.

    Knowledge Gained Student can Student can Student can accurately Student appears to
    accurately answer accurately answer answer about 70% of have insufficient
    all questions related most questions questions related to facts knowledge about
    to facts in the poster (80%) related to in the poster and the facts or
    and processes used facts in the poster processes used to create processes used in
    to create the poster. and processes used the poster. the poster.
    to create the poster.

    Use of Class Time Used time well Used time well Used some of the time Did not use class
    during each class during each class well during each class time to focus on the
    period. Focused on period. Usually period. There was some project OR often
    getting the project focused on getting focus on getting the distracted others.
    done. Never the project done. project done but
    distracted others. occasionally distracted
    others.

    Attractiveness The poster is The poster is The poster is acceptably The poster is
    exceptionally attractive in terms attractive though it may distractingly messy
    attractive in terms of of design, layout be a bit messy. or very poorly
    design, layout, and and neatness. designed. It is not
    neatness. attractive.

    Graphics - All graphics are All graphics are All graphics relate to the Graphics do not
    Relevance related to the topic related to the topic topic. Most borrowed relate to the topic
    and make it easier and most make it graphics have a source OR several
    to understand. All easier to citation. borrowed graphics
    borrowed graphics understand. All do not have a
    have a source borrowed graphics source citation.
    citation. have a source
    citation.

    Grammar/ There are no There in no more There in no more than There are more
    Mechanics grammatical than one two grammatical than 2 grammatical
    mistakes on the grammatical mistakes, and no more mistakes on the
    poster. There are mistake, and no than two spelling/ poster, and more
    also no spelling or more than one capitalization errors on than 2 spelling/
    capitalization errors spelling/ the poster. capitalization errors
    on the poster. capitalization error on the poster.
    on the poster.

    You might also like