Scribd
Upload
381 views2 pages

SBM VAlidation Form

This document outlines a 3-step process for validating a school's status as a School-Based Management institution. Step 1 evaluates the school's performance improvement across indicators like enrollment, dropout rate, and test scores. Step 2 assesses the school's implementation of SBM principles. Step 3 calculates an overall rating based on performance improvement and SBM assessment to determine if the school is developing, maturing, or advanced in SBM.

Uploaded by

ameriza
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
381 views2 pages

SBM VAlidation Form

This document outlines a 3-step process for validating a school's status as a School-Based Management institution. Step 1 evaluates the school's performance improvement across indicators like enrollment, dropout rate, and test scores. Step 2 assesses the school's implementation of SBM principles. Step 3 calculates an overall rating based on performance improvement and SBM assessment to determine if the school is developing, maturing, or advanced in SBM.

Uploaded by

ameriza
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Region IV CALABARZON

Division of City Schools


Santa Rosa City
APLAYA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

SBM VALIDATION FORM


S.Y. 2012-1013
Step 1 : Determine Performance Improvement ( 60%)

Thematic Performance Rating& Computation Results


Area indicators Equivalent Points
Access Enrolment % of Inc.
1- Marginal:
(45 %) Increase At least 1%
SY 2009-10 increase
SY2010-11 27.95 2- Average :
At least 7%
SY2011-12 increase
Ave. % of 3- High : At least
Increase: 10% increase

Efficiency Dropout % of Baseline: 7.06


1- Marginal :At
(25%) Rate (DR) Dec. least 25%
SY 2009-10 9.54 decrease
SY2010-11 11.14 2- Average: At
SY2011-12 least 50%
decrease
Ave. % of 3- High: Has 0 DR
Decrease :
Completion % of Inc. Baseline: 75 %
1- Marginal:
Rate (CR) At least 5 %
SY 2009-10 increase
SY2010-11 64.81 2- Average :
At least 7%
SY2011-12 increase
Ave. % of 3- High : At least
Increase: 10% increase

Cohort % of Inc. Baseline: 76 %


1- Marginal:
Survival At least 5%
Rate (CSR) increase
SY 2009-10 51.52 2- Average :
At least 7%
SY2010-11 51 increase
SY2011-12 3- High : At least
Ave. % of 10% increase

Increase :
Sub-total
(DR+CR+
CSR)
Quality NAT MPS % of Inc. Baseline: 48 %
SY 2009-10 39.76
(30%) 1-Marginal : 26-50%
SY2010-11 35.29
2- Average : 51-75%
SY2011-12 35.38
3-High : 76-100%
Ave. % of
Increase :
SUB-TOTAL
Interpretation ____ Good
____ Better
____ Best
Legend:
Numerical Rating Scale Description
0.50-1.49 Good
1.50-2.49 Better
2.50-3.0 Best

Note: Only Schools having a Performance Improvement of Better can apply to the Division for SBM Validation.

Step 2 : Compute for Validated SBM Assessment Scores (40%)

Cumulative Scores of
SBM Principles Weight Validators per Principle Results
Computation
Leadership 30 % 2 X 0.3 0.6
Curriculum &Learning 30 % 2.14 X 0.3 0.64
Accountability 25 % 2.2 X 0.25 0.55
Resource Management 15 % 2 X 0.15 0.3
Subtotal 100 % 2.09

Interpretation ____ Good


_ _ Better
____ Best
Legend:
Numerical Rating Scale Description
0.50-1.49 Good
1.50-2.49 Better
2.50-3.0 Best

Step 3 : Compute for Final Rating

Areas Weight Computation Results


A. Performance 60 %
Improvement
B. SBM Assessment 40% 2.09 x 0.40 0.836
Score (DOD)
TOTAL 100 %

Interpretation ____ Developing ( Level I )


____ Maturing ( Level II)
____ Advanced ( Level III)
Legend:
Numerical Rating Scale Description
0.50-1.49 Developing
1.50-2.49 Maturing
2.50-3.0 Advanced

You might also like