TISD Curriculum Management Plan 2012-13
TISD Curriculum Management Plan 2012-13
TISD Curriculum Management Plan 2012-13
2012-2013
www.txkisd.net
Table of Contents
Appendices
C Assessment
C.1 Assessment Calendar ................................................................... 24-28
C.2 Matrix of Elementary Assessment Tools .............................................29
C.3 Matrix of Secondary Assessment Tools ..............................................30
District Philosophy
All students can learn and are expected to learn. The education of our youth is a shared responsibility of
the school, the family, and the community. All groups should be focused on the pursuit of excellence in
education.
Mission Statement
Texarkana Independent School District will provide an exceptional education for all learners in a quality
environment which nurtures the intellectual, social, cultural and physical development of each students
overall well-being.
District Beliefs
We believe that our strength lies in the cultural and socio-economic diversity of our students.
We believe that all children can succeedno exceptionsand we will strive to provide a
personalized education that maximizes the potential for each student.
We believe that a guaranteed and viable curriculum is the most effective strategy to impact
student achievement.
We believe that a competent, committed, and caring staff is essential to a quality education.
We believe that community trust and support are critical to the success of our district.
The essential purpose of a school system is to educate all students to high levels through quality teaching
and learning. The Texarkana Independent School District is committed to continuous improvement of the
teaching and learning process so that students will have the knowledge, skills, concepts, processes, and
attitudes to function successfully in society.
In TISD, the curriculum will be designed and delivered using an approach that includes the following
premises:
The purpose of the Texarkana Independent School District Curriculum Management Plan is to provide a
framework for the alignment of the written, taught, and tested curriculum. This comprehensive plan
provides the structure to ensure quality control of the designed and delivered curriculum, internal
consistency, and resources necessary to address the districts mission and goals.
The plan also conveys the procedural intent of the district leadership with respect to curriculum
development, adoption, implementation, evaluation, and revision. It provides clear direction for students,
parents, teachers, and administrators in the system, establishing a framework that outlines guidelines and
procedures for the design, delivery, monitoring, and evaluation of curriculum.
All district staff members are responsible for ensuring that all students learn the districts curriculum and
demonstrate achievement at high levels. As a function of responsibilities, certain roles can be specified,
although the responsibilities are not limited to those listed.
Board of Trustees
The Board will:
Adopt goals that provide a well-balanced curriculum resulting in improved student learning;
Establish policies to direct and support ongoing curriculum development and evaluation;
Adopt a budget that provides for the development, implementation, training, and evaluation of
curriculum;
Authorize the implementation and review of a strategic plan for the district that identifies
community expectations of curriculum;
Communicate to its constituents the Boards curricular expectations.
Superintendent
The Superintendent will:
Implement board policies related to curriculum;
Annually report to the Board concerning implementation;
Oversee the work of district staff in accomplishing their responsibilities.
Principals
Principals will:
Develop a working knowledge of the curriculum content for all subjects/courses to effectively
monitor delivery of the curriculum;
Translate the importance of effective curriculum and instruction practices on a daily basis;
Monitor the delivery of the district curriculum through the following basic strategies:
a. Walk-through observations
b. Data Walks
c. Formal classroom observations
d. Periodic review of lesson plans and curriculum documents
Ensure effective instructional delivery;
Collaborate with individuals and learning teams;
Work with teams to review and interpret assessment data, set goals, and plan for continuous
improvement of achievement;
Update Campus Improvement Plans to support effective curriculum management;
Ensure that student progress in achievement is reported regularly to parents in an
understandable manner;
Facilitate and participate in professional development.
Teachers
Teachers will:
Deliver the District curriculum, using strategies most effective for the students;
Assess student learning with a variety of classroom, district, and state assessments;
Use assessment data to drive instructional decisions;
Involve students in the learning and assessing process;
Involve parents in the learning process;
Communicate strengths and weaknesses to students, parents, and others as appropriate;
Participate in district, campus, and personal professional development.
Students
Students will:
Be an active partner in the learning and assessing process;
Understand their own learning strengths and weaknesses;
Meet or exceed learning requirements based on the District curriculum and standards;
Exhibit behavior that is conducive to learning for self and others.
Parents
Parents will:
Be valued partners in the learning process;
Accept a shared responsibility working with the teacher in the learning process;
Support the development of academic, communication, life, and technology skills.
The curriculum will be developed, implemented, and evaluated based on a 6-phase implementation
schedule.
Phase 1 Phase 6
Phase 2 Phase 5
Phase 3 Phase 4
Continuous Improvement
Using a model of continuous improvement, the IS team will emphasize the analysis of a variety of
student data to promote data-driven instructional decisions. This model will include a cycle of
evaluation for curriculum, instruction, and assessment.
All new instructional staff will be trained in the phases of curriculum development outlined above.
The curricula for all state foundation courses that lead to an assessment through the Texas testing
system will be reviewed at the end of each academic year, following the receipt of the state assessment
scores. All other courses, including foundation elective courses, will be reviewed every other year.
This review cycle is for planning purposes. The cycle will be modified to reflect any changes in the state
assessment system or in the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills.
Curriculum review, including analysis and evaluation of teaching and learning, is a district expectation.
For core subject areas which follow the CSCOPE curriculum, this process will include curriculum
reconciliation at the end of each grading period and a formal evaluation of the instructional process. For
state enrichment subject areas and state foundation elective courses, the curriculum review cycle will
include aligning, writing, and revising curriculum.
Revising Curriculum
In accordance with the curriculum review cycle, teams will submit recommendations for curriculum
revisions to the subject area committees. Document revisions or adjustments, such as clarification of
objectives, resource references, or suggested activities will be made during the summer and before
August 1. All documents will be published before the beginning of the next academic year.
(1) A rigorous written curriculum, in clear and consistent form, for application by teachers in
classrooms or related instructional settings
(2) A rigorous taught curriculum that is shaped by and interactive with the written one
(3) A rigorous assessed curriculum that is linked to both the taught and written curricula and that
includes the tasks, concepts, and skills for student learning
(4) Technology, used for instruction, assessment, management, and the support of teaching and
learning, is also an integral component.
Curriculum Documents
Curriculum documents consist of the following:
Vertical Alignment Documents These documents present aligned standards (including the
TEKS knowledge and skill statement and student expectations) among grade levels. Each
standard includes specificity for each student expectation so instruction and standards are truly
aligned between and among grade levels.
Year at a Glance (YAG) The Year at a Glance is designed to present a quick snapshot of the
entire years instructional plan.
TEKS Verification Matrix This matrix ensures that all of the state standards are fully
accounted for in the CSCOPE curriculum system.
Instructional Focus Document (IFD) These documents logically group the specified
standards into coherent units of instruction. They include a rationale to explain why the standards
are bundled together, misconceptions, performance indicators, academic vocabulary, concepts,
and key understandings.
Unit Tests Unit tests assess the specified student expectations as noted on the Instructional
Focus Document. These assessments include a variety of items, including ones which are
written in the format of the state assessment.
The primary function of a school system is to produce increased student learning over time. This requires
a school system to establish a clear, valid, and measurable set of pupil standards for learning. It is the
expectation of the District that learning will be enhanced by adherence to an aligned, articulated
curriculum that promotes continuity and cumulative acquisition of skills and knowledge from grade to
grade and from school to school. With this expectation, the PK-12 curriculum will be based on a core set
of objectives that are clearly articulated and aligned to the graduate profile and to state standards in each
discipline and/or course of study.
Standards will be used to formulate measurable objectives that are set into a workable framework for
teachers. In the Texarkana Independent School District, these desired student learning expectations
begin with the essential knowledge and skills specified by the State of Texas (TEKS). In the core subject
areas, vertical alignment teams analyze each knowledge statement in the TEKS and review the specificity
added to each student expectation so that teachers will have a clear understanding of what students
should know and be able to do on each grade level or in each course. These specified student
expectations are the guiding force for curriculum, instruction, student assessment, and the teachers
delivery system.
Assessment Components
The assessed curriculum should include the following components:
On-going classroom level assessment of student learning in a variety of formats
A variety of tools to assess students, resources, and curriculum
Adequate practice and assessment in the testing format (context) of required state assessments
A district-wide criterion-referenced information management system that provides timely, efficient
assessment feedback to students, teachers, and administrators
An assessment process that allows students to demonstrate and receive credit with no prior
instruction in a particular course
A program evaluation component that guides curriculum redesign, instructional planning, and
programmatic decisions based on student achievement within each program area
Notes:
See Appendix C.1 for the current District Assessment Calendar.
See Appendices C.2 and C.3 for a matrix of assessment tools.
See the TISD Assessment Plan for more additional information.
Note: See the TISD Professional Development Plan for additional information.
Curriculum monitoring is an evaluation process that occurs during every phase of the curriculum
development cycle. All instructional staff members are responsible for monitoring the curriculum to
ensure that the written, taught, and tested curricula are aligned.
Teachers monitor through continuous evaluation of student performance data. Teachers identify the
instructional needs of individual students and of groups of students and then modify instruction based on
these needs. Throughout the year, teachers track the written curriculum, making notations for possible
revisions to the written curriculum.
Subject area departments or campus teams use data as a basis for collaboration and planning.
As the instructional leader of the campus, the principal has the primary responsibility for monitoring the
implementation of the written curriculum. Monitoring should occur through the following:
Campus curriculum coaches also are critical staff members in the monitoring process by stressing the
importance of the written curriculum, by ensuring that resources are available, and by providing needed
staff development in collaboration with School Improvement.
District administrators monitor the curriculum through data analysis and provide periodic reports to the
Superintendent and the Board of Trustees that project actions and summarize accomplishments.
Curriculum
Curriculum in Texarkana ISD is defined as the knowledge, skills, concepts, processes, and attitudes to be
taught and learned at the appropriate levels/area or in courses in our schools. The word curriculum refers
to what is written, taught, and tested.
Curriculum Alignment
Curriculum alignment is the coordination, or horizontal alignment, of what is written, taught, and tested
within a course, within a grade level, and from school to school. It also is the articulation, or vertical
alignment, of the curriculum from PK-12.
Written Curriculum
Written curriculum is defined as those standards, goals, and objectives students are to achieve and
teachers are to teach. It contains knowledge, concepts, and skills which are aligned to state standards;
developed assessments; suggested timeframes; and aligned resources.
Taught Curriculum
Taught curriculum refers to the delivery of the written curriculum. It is the process that is used by
teachers to develop units of study, lesson plans, and/or approaches to instruction for teaching the written
curriculum. Teachers follow the courses of study and instructional materials provided by the District, the
essential knowledge and skills for each subject mandated by the state, and the scope and sequence
developed by teachers and approved by the district.
Tested Curriculum
Tested curriculum is that portion of the written curriculum that is assessed, both formally and informally, to
evaluate student progress toward mastery of the written curriculum. Teacher-made tests, district
assessments and state assessments are congruent with what is written and taught.
Curriculum Design
Curriculum design refers to the act of creating the curriculum via specifications or templates.
Curriculum Delivery
Curriculum delivery refers to the act of implementing the curriculum, along with the identification of
professional development procedures to assist in this implementation.
Context Alignment
Instruction and assessment are aligned with the format or testing protocol students must follow for
success on an assessment.
Test Deconstruction
Test deconstruction is the act of taking test items and breaking them into smaller components, skills,
knowledge, and content for teaching in smaller pieces and from which to adjust the curriculum or the work
plan so teaching changes as a result. Deconstruction also involves the analysis of context.
Data Disaggregation
Data disaggregation refers to the act of analyzing student achievement data and other learning data to
guide instruction, set goals, and monitor programs and curriculum.
TISD Curriculum Management Plan 16
Glossary of Terms (continued)
Taught Tested
During the review process, teams will evaluate each textbook based on the Texas Essential Knowledge
and Skills for that course. Teams will assign four scores to each Student Expectation based on subject
area content, student experiences, teaching strategies, and assessment.
2) Student Experiences
Materials should consistently include activities that provide for:
Practicing the writing process
Reading to develop vocabulary, analysis, comprehension, cultural and research skills
Listening and speaking for a variety of purposes and audiences
Effectively communicating by and about visual representations.
3) Teaching Strategies
Materials should promote:
Active student learning
Effective use of technology
A variety of research-based teaching strategies to address the needs of all students
4) Assessment
Materials should include:
Multiple assessment tools
Objectives that evaluate the extent to which students can apply language arts processes to
new situations
Assessment Tool PK K 1 2 3 4 5
Texas Primary Reading Inventory x x x
Pre-and Post-Kids Assessment x
Pre and Post Assessments x x x
TELPAS x x x x x x
STAAR, STAAR L, STAAR Modified, STAAR Alternate Reading x x x
STAAR, STAAR L, STAAR Modified, STAAR Alternate Math x x x
STAAR, STAAR L, STAAR Modified, STAAR Alternate Science x
STAAR, STAAR L, STAAR Modified, STAAR Alternate Writing x
At-Risk Assessment - Math x x x x
At-Risk Assessment - Reading x x
Local Benchmark Tests - Reading x x x
Local Benchmark Tests - Math x x x x x x
Local Benchmark Tests - Writing x
Local Benchmark Tests - Science x x x x x x
Credit by Examination x x x x x x
ITBS x x
OLSAT x x x
*NAEP x
Program Assessments
Bilingual - ESL x x x x x x x
Gifted/Talented x x x x x x
Special Education x x x x x x x
Fitness Assessment x x x
Dyslexia x x x x
Assessment Tool 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
TELPAS x x x x x x x
TAKS/TAKS (Accommodated)/TAKS-M Reading/ELA x x
TAKS/ TAKS (Accommodated)/TAKS-M Math x x
TAKS/ TAKS (Accommodated)/TAKS-M Science x x
TAKS/ TAKS (Accommodated)/TAKS-M Social Studies x x
STAAR Reading/ STAAR EOC English I - III x x x x
STAAR Math/ STAAR EOC Alg. I, Geom., Alg. II x x x x
STAAR Science/ STAAR EOC Biology, Chemistry, Physics x x
STAAR Social Studies/ STAAR EOC Wor. Geo, US HIst, Wor. Hist. x x
STAAR Writing x
STAAR-Alternate x x x x x x
Local Semester Exams x x x x x x x
Local Benchmark Tests - Reading/ELA x x x x x x
Local Benchmark Tests - Math x x x x x x
Local Benchmark Tests - Social Studies x x x x x x
Local Benchmark Tests - Science x x x x x x
Credit by Examination x x x x x x x
OLSAT x
EXPLORE x
ASVAB x x
PLAN x
PSAT x x
SAT x x x
ACT x x x
*NAEP x x
Program Assessments
Bilingual - ESL x x x x x x x
Gifted/Talented x x x x x x x
Special Education x x x x x x x
Fitness Assessment x x x x x x x
Dyslexia x x x x x x x
Advanced Placement x x x
Review the TEKS Student Expectations on the YAG and the Instructional Focus
Document (IFD) to determine the cognitive level and content specificity.
Use the TEKS Verification Document or the CSCOPE search feature to
determine the grading periods in which the SEs are taught.
Analyze the unit assessment to determine the concepts, knowledge, skills,
context, and prior knowledge needed.
Analyze the performance indicators for content, process, product, and
evaluation method.
Determine the type of formative assessment and the evaluation method.
Plan the lesson and determine the research-based instructional strategies and
activities.
Determine the qualities of choice that you will use to increase student
engagement.