Management of Multiple Pregnancy
Management of Multiple Pregnancy
Management of Multiple Pregnancy
Table of Contents
Key Recommendations ................................................................................... 3
1. Purpose and Scope ..................................................................................... 5
2. Background and Introduction....................................................................... 5
3. Methodology.............................................................................................. 5
4. Clinical Guidelines ...................................................................................... 6
4.1 Diagnosis of multiple pregnancy ................................................................. 6
4.2 Delivery of Antenatal and Perinatal Care ..................................................... 6
4.3 Preterm Delivery ...................................................................................... 6
4.4 Indications for referral to a tertiary-level Fetal Medicine Unit ......................... 7
4.5 Ultrasound surveillance ............................................................................. 8
4.6 Twin-twin transfusion syndrome................................................................. 9
4.7 Timing of Delivery .................................................................................... 9
4.8 Mode of Delivery .................................................................................... 10
5. References .............................................................................................. 11
6. Implementation Strategy .......................................................................... 14
7. Key Performance Indicators....................................................................... 14
8. Qualifying Statement ................................................................................ 14
2
CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE MANAGEMENT OF MULTIPLE PREGNANCY
Key Recommendations
1. Where multiple gestation is identified on ultrasound examination, chorionicity
should be assigned at the earliest opportunity. This is best achieved before 14
weeks gestation.
4. Prenatal and perinatal care should be hospital-based for all multiple gestations,
coordinated by an obstetrician experienced in the management of multiple
gestation.
3
CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE MANAGEMENT OF MULTIPLE PREGNANCY
11. Mode of twin delivery should be considered on the basis of individual case
characteristics to include comorbidity, gestational age, availability of expertise
in the management of vaginal twin birth, and patient preference.
4
CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE MANAGEMENT OF MULTIPLE PREGNANCY
3. Methodology
Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched
using terms relating to multiple gestation, twin pregnancy, prenatal care, labour
and delivery complications, higher order multiple gestation. Searches were limited
to humans and restricted to the titles of English language articles published
between 1982 and 2012.
2004) and Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and
Gynaecologists guideline on Management of Monochorionic Twin Pregnancy (C-Obs
42; March 2011).
4. Clinical Guidelines
This differentiation becomes more difficult later in gestation and, in the setting of
concordant fetal gender, it may not be possible to confidently assign chorionicity.
Under such circumstances, the pregnancy should be described as of undetermined
chorionicity and monochorionicity should be assumed until proven otherwise.
When chorionicity is assigned, a photographic record of the ultrasound
image that supports that assignment should be kept in the womans
record.
6
CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE MANAGEMENT OF MULTIPLE PREGNANCY
Specifically, the following interventions aimed at reducing the risk of preterm birth
in multiple pregnancy have been studied and are considered not to reduce the risk
of preterm labour in twins: bed rest (Crowther, 2010), prophylactic cervical
cerclage (Dor et al, 1982), ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage (Berghella et al,
2005), vaginal progesterone therapy (Norman et al, 2009), intramuscular
progesterone (Combs et al, 2011; Durnwald et al, 2010) and tocolytic therapy
(Yamasmit et al, 2005).
Suspected monoamnionicity
If monoamnionicity is confirmed, the pregnancy should be managed by the Fetal
Medicine team.
7
CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE MANAGEMENT OF MULTIPLE PREGNANCY
In addition, in-utero fetal demise in one twin of a monochorionic pair confers a risk
of co-twin demise that is approximately 12% (Ong et al, 2006), such that the
cumulative risk of either co-twin death or severe neurological injury in a surviving
co-twin is 30%. Such sequelae exist as a consequence of shared placental
vasculature in a monochorionic gestation and are thought to result from severe
hypotension in the co-twin which occurs at the time of demise of one twin.
8
CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE MANAGEMENT OF MULTIPLE PREGNANCY
The large prospective ESPRiT study sought to identify the optimum gestational age
for elective delivery of uncomplicated monochorionic and dichorionic twin
pregnancies by determining the neonatal risk associated with elective delivery at
each gestational age in the late third trimester and to ascertain the prospective risk
of death or severe perinatal morbidity in ongoing pregnancies (Breathnach et al,
2012).
In the case of dichorionic twins, the risk of in-utero fetal death in the third trimester
is much lower (there were no deaths among dichorionic twins after 33 weeks in the
ESPRiT cohort). Furthermore, the absence of interdependence of placental
vasculature confers a lesser threat to the pregnancy in its entirety. A composite
9
CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE MANAGEMENT OF MULTIPLE PREGNANCY
10
CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE MANAGEMENT OF MULTIPLE PREGNANCY
5. References
Adam C, Allen AC, Baskett TF. Twin delivery: influence of the presentation and
method of delivery on the second twin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;165:23-7.
Armson BA, OConnell C, Persad V, Joseph KS, Young DC, Baskett TF. Determinants
of perinatal mortality and serious perinatal morbidity in the second twin. Obstet
Gynecol 2006;108:556-64.
Barigye O, Pasquini L, Galea P et al. High risk of unexpected late fetal death in
monochorionic twins despite intensive ultrasound surveillance: a cohort study. PLoS
Med 2005;2:e 172.
Breathnach FM, McAuliffe FM, Geary M, Daly S, Higgins JR, Dornan J et al.
Definition of intertwine birth weight discordance. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118(1) 94-
103.
Breathnach FM, McAuliffe FM, Geary M, Daly S, Higgins JR, Dornan J et al. Optimum
timing for planned delivery of uncomplicated monochorionic and dichorionic twin
pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2012;119(1):50-9.
Crowther CA. Cesarean delivery for the second twin. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
2000;CD000047.
Crowther CA, Hans S. Hospitalisation and bed rest for multiple pregnancy. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev 2010 Jul 7;(7):CD000110.
Donovan EF, Ehrenkranz RA, Shankaran S, Stevenson DK, Wright LL, Younes N et
al. Outcomes of very low birth weight twins cared for in the National Institute of
Child Health and Human Neonatal Development Neonatal Research Network,
January 1993 through December 1994. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179;742-749.
Durnwald CP, Momirova V, Peaceman AM, Scisione A, Rouse DJ, Caritis SN et al for
NICHD and MFMU Network. Second trimester cervical length and risk of preterm
11
CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE MANAGEMENT OF MULTIPLE PREGNANCY
Gocke SE, Nageotte MP, Garite T, et al. Management of the nonvertex second twin:
primary cesarean section, external version, or primary breech extraction. Am J
Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:111-4.
Grisaru D, Fuchs S, Kupferminc MJ, et al. Outcome of 306 twin deliveries according
to first twin presentation and method of delivery. Am J Perinatol 2000;17:303-7.
Hack KE, Derks JB, Elias SG et al. Increased perinatal mortality and clinical
implications of a large Duch cohort study. BJOG 2008;115:58-67.
Hogle KL, Hutton EK, McBrien KA, et al. Cesarean delivery for twins: a systematic
review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:220-7.
Jewell SE, Yip R. Increasing trends in plural births in the United States. Obstet
Gynecol 1995 85:229-232.
Lee YM, Wylie B, Simpson L, DAlton ME. Twin chorionicity and the risk of stillbirth.
Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:301-8.
National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence; Clinical Guideline Number 129.
Management of Twin and Triplet Pregnancies in the Antenatal Period. December
2011
Ong SS, Zamora J, Khan KS, Kilby MD, 2006. Prognosis for the co-twin following
single twin death: A systematic review. BJOG 113:992.
Powers WF, Kiely JL. The risk of confronting twins: a national perspective. Am J
Obstet Gynecol 1994:170:456-61.
12
CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE MANAGEMENT OF MULTIPLE PREGNANCY
Smith GC, Pell JP, Dobbie R. Birth order, gestational age, and the risk of delivery-
related perinatal death in twins: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2002;325:1004.
Smith GC, Shah I, White IR, Pell JP, Dobbie R. Mode of delivery and the risk of
delivery-related perinatal death among twins at term: a retrospective cohort study
of 8073 births. BJOG 2005;112:1139-44.
Smith GC, Fleming KM, White IR. Birth order of twins and risk of perinatal death
related to delivery in England, Northern Ireland and Wales, 1994-2003: a
retrospective cohort study, BMJ 2007;334:576.
Smith KE, Ravikumar N, Hession M, Morrison JJ. Trends in the obstetric features
and management of twin pregnancies. Ir Med J 2010 Mar; 103(3):70-2.
Talbot GT, Goldstein RF, Nesbitt T, Johnson JL, Kay HH. Is size discordancy an
indication for delivery of preterm twins? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:1050-4.
Wen SW, Fung Kee Fung K, et al. Neonatal morbidity in second twin according to
gestational age at birth and mode of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:773-
83.
Yang Q, Wen SW, Chen Y, Krewski D, Fung KFK, Walker M. Neonatal death and
morbidity in vertex-nonvertex second twins according to mode of delivery and
birthweight. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:840-7.
13
CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE MANAGEMENT OF MULTIPLE PREGNANCY
6. Implementation Strategy
8. Qualifying Statement
These guidelines have been prepared to promote and facilitate standardisation and
consistency of practice, using a multidisciplinary approach. Clinical material offered
in this guideline does not replace or remove clinical judgement or the professional
care and duty necessary for each pregnant woman. Clinical care carried out in
accordance with this guideline should be provided within the context of locally
available resources and expertise.
This Guideline does not address all elements of standard practice and assumes that
individual clinicians are responsible for:
14