SECOND DIVISION

[G.R. No. 212815. March 1, 2017.]

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES , plaintiff-appellee, vs . ENRILE DONIO y

UNTALAN , accused-appellant.

DECISION

PERALTA , J : p

This is an appeal from the November 4, 2013 Decisions 1 of the Court of Appeals
(CA) in CA-G.R. CR-HC No. 05418, which affirmed the Decision 2 dated January 24, 2012
of the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Branch 59, Angeles City in Criminal Case No. 04-594.
The facts are as follows:
Accused-appellant Enrile Donio y Untalan (Donio) was charged with violation of
Republic Act (R.A.) No. 6539, otherwise known as Anti-Carnapping Act of 1972, as
amended by R.A. No. 7659. Co-accused Val Paulino (Paulino) and one @Ryan (Ryan),
both remains at-large, were similarly charged. The accusatory portion of the
Information reads:
That on or about the 26th day of November 2003, in the Municipality of
Mabalacat, Province of Pampanga, Philippines, and within the jurisdiction of
this Honorable Court, the above-named accused, conspiring, confederating
together and mutually helping one another, with intent of gain and without the
knowledge and consent of the owner, did then and there willfully, unlawfully and
feloniously take, steal and carry away with them one (1) Honda TMX 155
tricycle, colored black and with Body [No.] 817, valued at Ninety-Six Thousand
([P]96,000.00) Pesos, Philippine Currency, and on the occasion thereof, Raul L.
Layug, being the driver and owner of the said Honda TMX 155 tricycle, was
killed with the use of a mini jungle bolo.
Contrary to law. 3
Pending Donio's arraignment, PO1 Ernessito N. Bansagan and the National
Bureau of Investigation, Central Luzon Regional Of ce submitted the returns on the
Warrant of Arrest against Ryan and Paulino, respectively, stating that the said persons
could not be located at the given addresses, and requested for alias warrants against
them. The trial court issued the Alias Warrant of Arrest against accused Ryan on
September 4, 2004 and against Paulino on November 4, 2004. 4 CAIHTE

At his arraignment, Donio, assisted by his counsel de oficio, pleaded not guilty to
the offense charged. During the pre-trial conference, it was stipulated that Donio is the
same person whose name appears in the Information and was arraigned before that
court.
Thereafter, the trial on the merits ensued.
On November 26, 2003, six police of cers of the Concepcion Police Station,
Tarlac City, headed by SPO4 Leodegario Taberdo (SPO4 Taberdo) , conducted a
checkpoint along the junction of MacArthur Highway in relation to the campaign of the
Philippine National Police against hijacking, carnapping, and kidnapping, hailing cargo
trucks and closed vans, and issuing cards to southbound vehicles. 5
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. 2017 cdasiaonline.com
 At 2:30 in the morning on November 26, 2003, a speeding tricycle abruptly
stopped a few meters from the checkpoint and caught the attention of the police
of cers. SPO4 Taberdo and two others approached the vehicle. The driver, later
identi ed as Donio, was noticeably agitated while repeatedly kicking the starter of the
tricycle. When asked for his identity, he introduced himself as Raul Layug (Raul) and
then handed to SPO4 Taberdo a temporary license bearing the said name. The police
of cers asked the driver and his companions, co-accused Paulino and Ryan, to bring
the vehicle, a Honda TMX 155 tricycle with Body No. 817, to the checkpoint when they
failed to produce its certificate of registration and the official receipt. 6
Upon visual search of the vehicle, they discovered a bloodstained mini jungle
bolo inside. They seized the tricycle and the bolo, and then brought the three to the
police station. At 9 o'clock in the morning, Donio asked permission to leave in order to
get the registration papers. The officers allowed him, however, he did not return. 7
Meanwhile, around 6:30 in morning of the same date, Rodrigo Layug (Rodrigo)
was searching for his brother Raul, the victim, who has not returned home since last
night. Raul was the driver of Rodrigo's Honda TMX 155 tricycle with Body No. 817.
Rodrigo met with his tricycle driver cousin from Mawaque to ask him if he saw his
brother. His cousin accompanied him to Barangay Madapdap where they found the
remains of Raul. Words spread about his death. Thereafter, a tricycle driver informed
them that he saw a vehicle similar to Rodrigo's at the Concepcion Police Station.
Rodolfo, Raul and Rodrigo's other brother, went to the station where he learned that
Paulino and Ryan were released. 8
Sometime in December 2003, the brothers returned to the station upon learning
that Donio was apprehended. On December 7, 2003, the Chief of Police summoned
SPO4 Taberdo to identify the driver who asked permission to retrieve the registration
papers but did not return at the Concepcion Police Station. Upon seeing Donio, the
disgruntled SPO4 Taberdo asked him, "Why did you do that?" He was referring to the
incident when Donio did not return. It was also that same day that he learned Donio's
real identity. 9 DETACa

Dr. Reynaldo C. Dizon (Dr. Dizon) conducted the post-mortem examination of

Raul's body and determined that he sustained stab wounds caused by a sharp
instrument.
Defense's sole witness, Donio, a 35-year-old grass cutter and a resident of
Madapdap, Mabalacat, Pampanga, denied the accusations. As a sugarcane plantation
worker, he has a long palang for harvesting and cutting. It was not similar to the sharp
and pointed mini jungle bolo. As a stay-in plantation worker, he does not leave the
workplace for six months. His wife visits him instead.
On November 24, 2003, he was harvesting sugarcane in Capas, Tarlac. However,
from the evening of November 25, 2003 until the next day, he was at home after his wife
fetched him to tend to their sick child. He rst learned of the carnapping charge when
the police of cers came to his house looking for a certain Val Paulino. He was taken to
the municipal hall where he was investigated and detained for ve days. Three of cers
beat and electrocuted him for three hours forcing him to admit the crime. 1 0
The RTC convicted Donio of the crime of carnapping with homicide. The
dispositive portion of the decision reads:
WHEREFORE, the Court nds the accused ENRILE U. DONIO guilty
beyond reasonable doubt of the offense of Carnapping as de ned in Section 2
and penalized under Section 14 of Republic Act No. 6539, as amended by
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. 2017 cdasiaonline.com
 Republic Act No. 7659, and hereby sentences him to suffer the penalty of
reclusion perpetua, with credit of his preventive imprisonment.
Accused ENRILE U. DONIO is further ordered to pay the heirs of the victim
Raul L. Layug the following amounts: Fifty thousand pesos ([P]50,000.00) as
civil indemnity and Twenty- ve thousand pesos ([P]25,000.00) as actual
damages.
No costs.
SO ORDERED. 1 1
The trial court ruled that the prosecution established all the elements of the
crime. Donio failed to substantiate his presence at another place at the time of the
perpetration of the offense or the physical impossibility of his presence at the locus
criminis or its immediate vicinity at the time of the incident. 1 2 . Under the Rules, SPO4
Taberdo's action as police of cer enjoys the presumption of regularity. In the absence
of evidence showing that he was motivated by bad faith or ill-will to testify against
Donio, SPO4 Taberdo's categorical identification of the accused stands. 1 3
In a Decision dated November 4, 2013, the CA denied Donio's appeal and
af rmed the decision of the RTC. The CA found his averment that he was taken from his
house, tortured and made to sign a blank sheet of paper as highly implausible. His
sworn af davit was replete with details which were unlikely the product of creative
imagination of the police. There was no proof that the police singled him out, or was
impelled by an evil or ulterior motive. The said af davit was voluntarily and freely
executed with the assistance of counsel. 1 4 The fallo of the decision states: aDSIHc

WHEREFORE , the appealed Decision is AFFIRMED .

SO ORDERED . 1 5
Hence, the instant appeal was instituted.
In its Manifestation and Motion in Lieu of Supplemental Brief, 1 6 the Of ce of the
Solicitor General (OSG) informed this Court that it opted not to le a supplemental brief
for the same would only be a repetition of the raised arguments considering that all
relevant matters regarding Donio's guilt for the crime of carnapping with homicide were
extensively argued and discussed in the People's Briefly 1 7 dated July 9, 2013.
Likewise, Donio, through the Public Attorney's Of ce, manifested his intention not
to le a supplemental brief and prayed that the case be deemed submitted for
decision. 1 8
In essence, the issue to be resolved by this Court in this appeal is whether the
prosecution has successfully proven beyond reasonable doubt that Donio is guilty of
the crime of carnapping with homicide.
After a judicious review of the records and the submissions of the parties, this
Court finds no cogent reason to reverse Donio's conviction.
At the outset, the CA noted that the prosecution should have led an Information
for the special complex crime of quali ed carnapping in aggravated form. 1 9 While it is
necessary that the statutory designation be stated in the information, a mistake in the
caption of an indictment in designating the correct name of the offense is not a fatal
defect as it is not the designation that is controlling but the facts alleged in the
information which determines the real nature of the crime. 2 0 Recently, it was held that
failure to designate the offense by the statute or to mention the speci c provision
penalizing the act, or an erroneous speci cation of the law violated, does not vitiate the
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. 2017 cdasiaonline.com
 information if the facts alleged therein clearly recite the facts constituting the crime
charged. 2 1 The recital of the ultimate facts and circumstances in the complaint or
information determines the character of the crime and not the caption or preamble of
the information or the speci cation of the provision of the law alleged to have been
violated. 2 2 In the case at bar, the acts alleged to have been committed by Donio are
averred in the Information, and the same described the acts de ned and penalized
under Sections 2 and 14 of R.A. 6539, as amended.
The elements of carnapping as de ned and penalized under the R.A. No. 6539, as
amended are the following:
1. That there is an actual taking of the vehicle;
2. That the vehicle belongs to a person other than the offender himself;
3. That the taking is without the consent of the owner thereof; or that the
taking was committed by means of violence against or intimidation of
persons, or by using force upon things; and
4. That the offender intends to gain from the taking of the vehicle. 2 3
Under the last clause of Section 14 of the R.A. 6539, as amended, the
prosecution has to prove the essential requisites of carnapping and of the homicide or
murder of the victim, and more importantly, it must show that the original criminal
design of the culprit was carnapping and that the killing was perpetrated "in the course
of the commission of the carnapping or on the occasion thereof." 2 4 In other words, to
prove the special complex crime of carnapping with homicide, there must be proof not
only of the essential elements of carnapping, but also that it was the original criminal
design of the culprit and the killing was perpetrated in the course of the commission of
the carnapping or on the occasion thereof. 2 5 ETHIDa

Records show that all the elements of carnapping in the instant case are present
and proven during the trial.
The tricycle was de nitely ascertained to belong to Rodrigo, as evidenced by a
Deed of Conditional Sale in his favor. 2 6 Donio was found driving the vehicle in the early
morning of November 26, 2003, the same day Rodrigo was looking for his missing
brother Raul. Also, SPO4 Taberdo positively identi ed Donio as the driver he agged
down at the checkpoint in his testimony, viz.:
xxx xxx xxx
Q- On or about that time 2:45 early in the morning of November 26, 2003,
could you recall if there was any unusual incident that required your
attention as Police Officers manning the check-point?
A- Yes, sir.
Q- What is that incident?
A- During that time, we are issuing pass card among vehicles going to South
when suddenly a speeding tricycle approaching our PCP its engine
suddenly stop.
Q- Who was driving the tricycle when the engine suddenly stop[s]?
A- The one who gave me the Driver's License was Raul Layug.
Q- If this person who gave his license as Raul Layug is here present today,
will you be able to identify him?
A- Yes, sir.
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. 2017 cdasiaonline.com
 Q- Will you please look around the premises of the Court and point to him.
A- This one, sir. We came to know later on that his real name is Enrile Donio.
INTERPRETER:
Witness pointed to accused Enrile Donio.
xxx xxx xxx 2 7
"Unlawful taking" or apoderamiento is the taking of the motor vehicle without the
consent of the owner, or by means of violence against or intimidation of persons, or by
using force upon things. It is deemed complete from the moment the offender gains
possession of the thing, even if he has no opportunity to dispose of the same. 2 8
Section 3 (j), Rule 131 of the Rules of Court provides the presumption that a person
found in possession of a thing taken in the doing of a recent wrongful act is the taker
and the doer of the whole act. cSEDTC

The presumption that a person found in possession of the personal effects

belonging to the person robbed and killed is considered the author of the aggression,
the death of the person, as well as the robbery committed, has been invariably limited
to cases where such possession is either unexplained or that the proffered explanation
is rendered implausible in view of independent evidence inconsistent thereto. 2 9 The
said principle may be applied in this case as the concept of unlawful taking in theft,
robbery and carnapping being the same. 3 0 Here, Donio failed to produce the vehicle's
papers at the checkpoint. He impersonated the victim before the police of cers when
his identity was asked, and left under the guise of getting the said documents. It was
also established that he and the others were strangers to Rodrigo. Donio's unexplained
possession, coupled with the circumstances proven in the trial, therefore, raises the
presumption that he was one of the perpetrators responsible for the unlawful taking of
the vehicle and Raul's death.
Intent to gain or animus lucrandi, which is an internal act, is presumed from the
unlawful taking of the motor vehicle. Actual gain is irrelevant as the important
consideration is the intent to gain. The term "gain" is not merely limited to pecuniary
bene t but also includes the bene t which in any other sense may be derived or
expected from the act which is performed. Thus, the mere use of the thing which was
taken without the owner's consent constitutes gain. 3 1 Donio's intent to gain from the
carnapped tricycle was proven as he and his companions were using it as means of
transportation when they were confronted by the Concepcion police officers.
Having established that the elements of carnapping are present in the instant
case, We now discuss the argument that the circumstantial evidence presented by the
prosecution are insufficient to convict Donio of the crime of carnapping with homicide.
He alleges that while it is true that criminal conviction may be predicated on a
series of circumstantial evidence, the same must be convincing, plausible and credible.
It cannot be discounted that SPO4 Taberdo testi ed only on the circumstances after
the alleged carnapping. He failed to establish his alleged participation prior to or during
the actual taking of the vehicle. The facts established by SPO4 Taberdo's testimony
the Concepcion police operatives caught him in possession of the stolen tricycle on
November 26, 2003; the tricycle was registered under the name of Rodrigo; and he was
in possession of Raul's license are insuf cient bases and do not lead to an inference
exclusively consistent with his guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Such contention fails scrutiny. The lack or absence of direct evidence does not
necessarily mean that the guilt of the accused can no longer be proved by any other
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. 2017 cdasiaonline.com
 evidence. Circumstantial, indirect or presumptive evidence, if suf cient, can replace
direct evidence as provided by Section 4, Rule 133 of the Rules of Court, which, to
warrant the conviction of an accused, requires that: (a) there is more than one (1)
circumstance; (b) the facts from which the inferences are derived have been proven;
and (c) the combination of all these circumstances results in a moral certainty that the
accused, to the exclusion of all others, is the one who committed the crime. 3 2 Hence,
to justify a conviction based on circumstantial evidence, the combination of
circumstances must be interwoven in such a way as to leave no reasonable doubt as to
the guilt of the accused. 3 3 SDAaTC

After a careful perusal of the records, this Court nds that the con uence of the
following pieces of circumstantial evidence, consistent with one another, establishes
Donio's guilt beyond reasonable doubt:
First, Donio was driving the tricycle when he, Paulino and Ryan were accosted
during a checkpoint at the junction of the MacArthur Highway by elements of the
Concepcion Police Station at around 2:30 in the morning on November 26, 2003;
Second, his possession of the vehicle was not fully explained as he failed to
produce its registration papers;
Third, he was in possession of the victim's temporary license. He even presented
it and introduced himself as Raul to the police;
Fourth, a bloodstained mini jungle bolo was found inside the tricycle;
Fifth, Rodrigo ascertained that Raul was the driver of his tricycle, and that he was
looking for him on the same day that Donio and the others were flagged down;
Sixth, Raul was last seen driving the tricycle at 10:00 in the evening on November
25, 2003 when he passed by at the Mawaque Terminal at the corner of MacArthur
Highway and Mawaque Road. 3 4
Seventh, the Bantay Bayan of Madapdap Resettlement found Raul's body at
around 6:30 in the morning on November 26, 2003 at a vacant lot towards the road to
Sta. Lucia Resettlement corner Barangay Dapdap.
Eighth, Raul sustained multiple stab wounds caused by a sharp instrument as
depicted in the post-mortem examination sketch by Dr. Dizon and re ected in the
Certificate of Death, which states:
17. CAUSES OF DEATH:
I. Immediate Cause: Cardio respiratory arrest
Antecedent Cause: Hemo-pneumothorax L acEHCD

Underlying Cause: Penetrating Stab Wounds, Multiple. 3 5

Ninth, Donio was subsequently apprehended and SPO4 Taberdo positively
identified him as the driver they flagged down at the checkpoint. 3 6
Likewise, the victim's lifeless body was found sprawled with multiple stab
wounds and was noted in a state of rigor mortis. Rigor mortis, which consists in the
stiffening of the muscular tissues and joints of the body setting in at a greater or less
interval after death, may be utilized to approximate the length of time the body has
been dead. In temperate countries, it usually appears three to six hours after death but
in warmer countries, it may develop earlier. In tropical countries, the usual duration of
rigor mortis is twenty-four to forty-eight hours during cold weather and eighteen to
thirty-six hours during summer. When rigor mortis sets in early, it passes off quickly and
vice-versa. 3 7
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. 2017 cdasiaonline.com
 From the foregoing, it was established that Raul was last seen driving the tricycle
at 10:00 in the evening on November 25, 2003, and that his body was discovered at
6:30 in the morning the next day. Considering the condition of the body upon discovery,
he could have been killed between 10:00 in the evening and 3:30 in the morning on the
next day. Donio and his companions were hailed at the checkpoint at around 2:30 3 8 in
the morning on November 26, 2003 aboard the missing tricycle. Taking into account
the distance of the Mawaque Terminal area or of the vacant lot near Barangay Dapdap
from the junction of the MacArthur Highway in Concepcion, Tarlac and the time they
were hailed at the checkpoint, it can be logically concluded that Donio and the others
were in contact with Raul during the approximate period of the latter's time of death.
Also, it was during that period that they gained possession of the vehicle. Thus, the only
rational conclusion that can be drawn from the totality of the foregoing facts and
circumstances is that Donio and his companions, to the exclusion of others, are guilty
of carnapping the tricycle and of killing Raul in the course thereof.
Moreover, when Donio was brought to the police station, he asked permission
from the of cers to get the registration papers but never returned. Undoubtedly,
Donio's ight is an indication of his guilt or of a guilty mind. Indeed, the wicked man
flees though no man pursueth, but the righteous are as bold as a lion. 3 9
This Court gives the highest respect to the RTC's evaluation of the testimony of
the witnesses, considering its unique position in directly observing the demeanor of a
witness on the stand. From its vantage point, the trial court is in the best position to
determine the truthfulness of witnesses. 4 0 The factual ndings of the appellate court
generally are conclusive, and carry even more weight when said court af rms the
ndings of the trial court, absent any showing that the ndings are totally devoid of
support in the records, or that they are so glaringly erroneous as to constitute grave
abuse of discretion. 4 1 In the case at bar, the RTC, as af rmed by the CA, gave credence
to the testimony of the prosecution witness. Records are bereft of evidence which
showed ill-will or malicious intent on the part of SPO4 Taberdo. In absence of evidence
to the contrary, this Court nds that the RTC and the CA did not err in the ndings of
facts and the credibility of the witnesses. SDHTEC

As for Donio's defense of alibi, he argues that it must not be looked with disfavor,
as there are instances when the accused may really have no other defense but denial
and alibi which, if established to be truth, may tilt the scales of justice in his favor,
especially when the prosecution evidence is inherently weak. He insists that he was
tortured and subjected to harsh treatment during arrest. He insinuates that the police
arrested the first person they suspected without conducting any in-depth investigation.
Donio maintained that he rst learned of the carnapping charge when the police
came to his house in Madapdap, Mabalacat, Pampanga on December 6, 2003.
However, he also alleged that as a stay-in sugarcane plantation worker in Capas, Tarlac
with a six-month work period ending in January, he never left the workplace and that his
wife visited him instead. Donio testified during direct and cross examination as follows:
xxx xxx xxx
ATTY. LOPEZ
Q: Mr. Witness, prior to your incarceration at the Angeles District Jail, where
were you residing?
A: Madapdap, Mabalacat, Pampanga, sir.
Q: On November 25, 2003 at around 10:00 o'clock in the evening to November
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. 2017 cdasiaonline.com
 26, 2003, do you remember where [you were] on the said dates?
A: Yes, sir.
Q: Where were you, Mr. Witness?
A: At home, sir.
Q: Who were your companions there?
A: My family, sir, my wife and child.
xxx xxx xxx 4 2
PROS. HABAN
Q: Where are you working again?
A: Capas AScHCD

xxx xxx xxx

Q: How about on November 27, 2003, where were you then?
A: At work.
Q: How about on November 25 and 26?
A: At work.
Q: During the whole day?
A: Stay-in.
Q: So you never left work?
A: No, sir.
Q: Never, not even Saturday and Sunday?
A: No, sir.
Q: The whole year of 2003 you never left work?
A: We stayed there for six (6) months.
Q: When is the end of six months period?
A: January.
xxx xxx xxx 4 3
No jurisprudence in criminal law is more settled than that alibi is the weakest of
all defenses, for it is easy to contrive and dif cult to disprove, and for which reason, it is
generally rejected. For the alibi to prosper, the accused must establish the following:
(1) he was not at the locus delicti at the time the offense was committed; and (2) it was
physically impossible for him to be at the scene at the time of its commission. 4 4 It
must be supported by credible corroboration from disinterested witnesses, and if not,
is fatal to the accused. 4 5
When he was confronted with his inconsistency, Donio clari ed that he was in
Capas, Tarlac and was fetched by his wife in the evening to attend to his sick child. We
note, however, the proximity of the area of Donio's residence with the Barangay Dapdap
and Sta. Lucia Resettlement area where the victim was found dead. To buttress his
defense of alibi, Donio could have presented the testimony of a fellow plantation
worker or any disinterested witness who could have substantiated the same. Aside
from his bare allegations, he failed to present convincing evidence of the physical
impossibility for him to be at the scene at the time of carnapping. Similarly, this Court is
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. 2017 cdasiaonline.com
 unconvinced of his insistence that he was tortured in view of lack of any evidence to
validate the same. Thus, the uncorroborated alibi and denial of Donio must be brushed
aside in light of the fact that the prosecution has suf ciently and positively ascertained
his identity. It is only axiomatic that positive testimony prevails over negative
testimony. 4 6 AcICHD

In sum, the prosecution established through suf cient circumstantial evidence

that the accused was indeed one of the perpetrators of the crime of carnapping with
homicide.
As to the imposable penalty, Section 14 of RA No. 6539, as amended, provides
that:
Sec. 14. Penalty for Carnapping. Any person who is found guilty of
carnapping, as this term is de ned in Section Two of this Act, shall, irrespective
of the value of motor vehicle taken, be punished by imprisonment for not less
than fourteen years and eight months and not more than seventeen years and
four months, when the carnapping is committed without violence or intimidation
of persons, or force upon things; and by imprisonment for not less than
seventeen years and four months and not more than thirty years, when the
carnapping is committed by means of violence against or intimidation of any
person, or force upon things; and the penalty of reclusion perpetua to
death shall be imposed when the owner, driver or occupant of the
carnapped motor vehicle is killed or raped in the course of the
commission of the carnapping or on the occasion thereof. 4 7
The RTC is correct in imposing the penalty of reclusion perpetua considering that
there was no alleged and proven aggravating circumstance. However, in line with the
recent jurisprudence, 4 8 in cases of special complex crimes like carnapping with
homicide, among others, where the imposable penalty is reclusion perpetua, the
amounts of civil indemnity, moral damages, and exemplary damages are pegged at
P75,000.00 each. This Court orders Donio to pay P50,000.00 as temperate damages in
lieu of the award of P25,000.00 as actual damages. Also, Donio is ordered to pay the
heirs of Raul interest on all damages awarded at the legal rate of six percent (6%) per
annum from the date of finality of the Decision.
WHEREFORE , the Decision dated November 4, 2013 of the Court of Appeals in
CA-G.R. CR-HC No. 05418, nding accused-appellant Enrile Donio y Untalan guilty
beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of Carnapping with homicide and sentencing him
to suffer the penalty of reclusion perpetua with all the accessory penalties, is hereby
AFFIRMED with MODIFICATIONS: accused-appellant Donio is ORDERED to PAY the
heirs of Raul L. Layug the amount of P75,000.00 as civil indemnity, P75,000.00 as moral
damages, P50,000.00 as temperate damages, and P75,000.00 as exemplary damages,
plus interest at the rate of six percent (6%) per annum from date of nality of the
Decision until fully paid. TAIaHE

SO ORDERED.
Carpio and Mendoza, JJ., concur.
Del Castillo * and Leonen, ** JJ., are on official leave.
Footnotes
* Designated Additional Member in lieu of Associate Justice Francis H. Jardeleza, per Raf e
dated September 1, 2014. (On official leave)
** On official leave.
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. 2017 cdasiaonline.com
 1 . Penned by Associate Justice Danton Q. Bueser, with Associate Justices Amelita G.
Tolentino and Rodil V. Zalameda, concurring, rollo, pp. 2-12.
2. Penned by Presiding Judge Ma. Angelica T. Paras-Quiambao, CA rollo, pp. 42-61.
3. Id. at 42.
4. Id. at 43.
5. Id. at 46.
6. Id.
7. Id.
8. Id. at 45.
9. Supra note 5.
10. Id. at 49.
11. Id. at 61.
12. Id. at 56.
13. Id. at 57.
14. Rollo p. 8.
15. Id. at 12. (Emphasis in the original)
16. Id. at 22-24.
17. CA rollo pp. 71-91.
18. Rollo pp. 27-28.
19. Supra note 16.
20. People v. Bali-balita, 394 Phil. 790, 814 (2000).
21. People v. Victor Padit, G.R. No. 202978, February 1, 2016.
22. Id.
23. People v. Bernabe and Garcia, 448 Phil. 269, 280 (2003).
24. People v. Fabian Urzais y Lanurias, G.R. No. 207662, April 13, 2016.
25. People v. Aquino, 724 Phil. 739, 757 (2014).
26. CA rollo p. 44.
27. TSN, May 11, 2006, pp. 8-9.
28. People v. Lagat, et al., 673 Phil. 351, 367 (2011).
29. People v. Geron, 346 Phil. 14, 25 (1997). (Emphasis supplied).
30. People v. Bustinera, G.R. No. 148233, June 8, 2004, 431 SCRA 284.
31. Id.
32. People v. Baez y Baylon, G.R. No. 198057, September 21, 2015.
33. People v. Lagat, et al., supra note 28.
34. Records, p. 11, Advance Information Report, Mabalacat Municipal Police Station.
35. CA rollo p. 52.
36. Id. at 53-54.
37. People v. Dulay , G.R. No. 92600, January 18, 1993, 217 SCRA 103, 119, citing Solis, Legal
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. 2017 cdasiaonline.com
 Medicine 127 [1987 ed.] (underscoring supplied).
38. 2:45 in other parts of Records.
39. People v. Dela Cruz, 4459 Phil. 130, 137 (2003).
40. People v. Abat, G.R. No. 202704, April 2, 2014, 720 SCRA 557, 564.
41. Corpuz v. People, 734 Phil. 353, 391 (2014).
42. TSN, September 24, 2009, p. 6.
43. TSN, August 3, 2010, pp. 3 and 5.
44. People v. Regaspi, G.R. No. 198309, September 7, 2015.
45. People v. Mallari, 707 Phil. 267, 281 (2013).
46. People v. Torres, et al., G.R. No. 189850, September 22, 2014, 735 SCRA 687, 704.
47. Emphasis supplied.
48. People v. Ireneo Jugueta, G.R. No. 202124, April 5, 2016.

CD Technologies Asia, Inc. 2017 cdasiaonline.com