The document is a self-assessment survey for students completing a Master's in Higher Education program to rate their competency in the 10 learning outcomes of the program. The student provides initial ratings when starting the program, current ratings near completion, and goals for the future.
For most outcomes, the student rated their initial level around a 5, their current level around an 8, showing perceived growth. The student commented that critical thinking, reflection, understanding context and audience, and ability to apply research have greatly improved but still have room for growth. The student aims to continue learning about theories, data analysis, communication technologies and maintaining ethical standards as a future leader.
The document is a self-assessment survey for students completing a Master's in Higher Education program to rate their competency in the 10 learning outcomes of the program. The student provides initial ratings when starting the program, current ratings near completion, and goals for the future.
For most outcomes, the student rated their initial level around a 5, their current level around an 8, showing perceived growth. The student commented that critical thinking, reflection, understanding context and audience, and ability to apply research have greatly improved but still have room for growth. The student aims to continue learning about theories, data analysis, communication technologies and maintaining ethical standards as a future leader.
The document is a self-assessment survey for students completing a Master's in Higher Education program to rate their competency in the 10 learning outcomes of the program. The student provides initial ratings when starting the program, current ratings near completion, and goals for the future.
For most outcomes, the student rated their initial level around a 5, their current level around an 8, showing perceived growth. The student commented that critical thinking, reflection, understanding context and audience, and ability to apply research have greatly improved but still have room for growth. The student aims to continue learning about theories, data analysis, communication technologies and maintaining ethical standards as a future leader.
The document is a self-assessment survey for students completing a Master's in Higher Education program to rate their competency in the 10 learning outcomes of the program. The student provides initial ratings when starting the program, current ratings near completion, and goals for the future.
For most outcomes, the student rated their initial level around a 5, their current level around an 8, showing perceived growth. The student commented that critical thinking, reflection, understanding context and audience, and ability to apply research have greatly improved but still have room for growth. The student aims to continue learning about theories, data analysis, communication technologies and maintaining ethical standards as a future leader.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3
M.Ed.
in Higher Education Program Learning Outcomes: Self-Assessment
Now that you are completing the M.Ed. in Higher Education, please rate your level of competency with the 10 learning outcomes (See Below). You first completed this assessment in HI ED 490. While you may not have kept that version, wed like you to think back when you first started the program and give yourself an honest appraisal of where you were with regard to the program learning outcomes when you began. Then give yourself a score for now in the Nearing Completion, and finally what you would like to achieve in the future.
Novice Average Mastery
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
M.Ed. Expected Program Learning Initia Nearing
Future Outcomes l Completion Academic Literacies and Habits of Mind: 1. Critical reading proficiencies I still have to improve in the area of reading proficiencies. In (especially analysis of research and many cases throughout this program, I found myself wishing I scholarly journal articles) to deal 5 8 had more time to read the literature on topics and develop a effectively with theoretical, empirical, deeper understanding of the material. and policy material in higher education 2. Critical writing proficiencies to analyze I believe that I have improved dramatically in my writing problems of practice, draw upon and ability and have benefited from the constant requirement to apply concepts studied, and synthesize 5 8 draw conclusions based on the literature. There is still so much ideas into relevant and useful more to learn and analyze and that is why I give myself an 8. conclusions 3. Critical thinking skills that require I do think that I have improved tremendously in this area. I suspended judgment and the application tackled some very sensitive subjects such as financial aid of relevant theory to varied areas of modeling, race relations, student success, leadership and more. practice, both in written material and Each one of these required me to suspend judgement and apply 5 8 oral communications theory to the discussion rather than insert my opinion. I have found these experiences professionally and personally rewarding. I believe I can still improve as I still get stuck in my own head sometimes! 4. Becoming a responsible, proactive, 3 8 I have never reflected like I was asked to do in this program reflective, life-long learner and I have improved dramatically. I find myself constantly reflecting on my work and wanting to learn more about delicate subjects and situations. I have improved but I think I have a long way to go! Social Learning and Communication: 5. Ability to collaborate with others, solve I believe that I started higher in this category than most others problems, make decisions and engage as I really enjoy working in groups and value that experience. in reflective practice Nevertheless, I had not done so in an academic setting in a rather long time and this exercise improved my ability to liaise professionally. I have appreciated the group projects and more 6 8 than anything, love how I was able to hear perspectives from outside of admissions. That was quite valuable and has influenced my work tremendously. I still think that because admissions is so fast-paced, that I have not mastered this area and must be very purposeful in my efforts to work with others and reflect. 6. Understanding of purpose, audience, I definitely improved in this area. Prior to this program, I barely and context for written communication ever thought about the audience that was reading my emails, and oral presentations reports, data, presentations. I was rather nave and self- absorbed thinking if it wasnt understood, it was the other persons problem. This program taught me the importance of 3 8 understanding your audience in order to most efficiently collaborate. Without it, you'll never get anywhere. I cant give myself a 10 because while I think I have mastered the understanding, the implementation is sometimes still difficult given how fast-paced admissions work is. 7. Use information and communication Im much better at information technologies than I am at technologies communication. I work well with data and am adept at programs like Excel. Nevertheless, when it comes to communication I still have a lot to learn. My projects are not 4 6 creative, nor are they very visually appealing. I need to improve my learning and I hope to enroll in some continuing ed courses related to design and marketing after this program! I hope that this will help my understanding. Practical and Professional Capabilities: 8. Draw upon key theories, concepts and I was so nave at the beginning of this program: I thought I research findings to assess current already knew about important theories related to Higher issues and challenges facing higher Education. Ultimately, I knew nothing. I now have a much education better understanding of the theories, concepts and research 2 8 findings that can help us serve our students and campuses. I feel as if a whole new world has been introduced to me and I am enjoying it! Due to time and personal constraints, I wasnt able to attain mastery and thus, I will dedicate myself to improvement even after the program is over. 9. Collect and analyze data to improve I have very much enjoyed the courses and projected that practice in particular administrative required me to analyze large swaths of data and I believe that areas of higher education because of the research component of this program, my skills 5 8 have improved. I believe no one has ever truly mastered anything (life-long learning!) so I gave myself a 9 because I can still improve. For example, my knowledge of statistical analysis is still lacking. 10. Clarify values and apply the standards You can never truly master ethics because life will also throw of professional and ethical practice as a you curve balls. I and my values will constantly be challenged, future leader in this field especially in admissions where competition is so fierce and it is so easy to cut corners. I have thought very critically about what 3 7 I value in our work and I know that as I progress in my career, I will improve in my ability to apply ethical standards to my work. Im dedicated to ethical practice already but know that I am not done!