Tmpa540 TMP
Tmpa540 TMP
Tmpa540 TMP
Copy rights: 2017 Isaac Karimi. This is an Open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 International License.
Isaac Karimi, et al. 1 J Bioinfo Proteomics Rev |Volume 3: Issue 2
Nootropic Effects of Quince Leaf
traditional and orthodox medicine (for a review see[7]). Hence, mice was explored after QLD intake using an EPM[9].
this study was aimed to investigate the memory enhancing ef-
fects of quince leaf decoct with a focus on encephalic AChE Object recognition test (ORT): ORT consisted of three steps.
activity and behavioral toxicology of normal mice. In silico mo- On day one mice were habituated in an empty arena (363636
lecular docking has been also implemented to elucidate possible cm3) for 5 min. Twenty four hours after habituation, two identi-
mechanisms governed by main components of quince leaves cal objects were presented in the arena, and mice were allowed
that interact with AChE. to explore the arena freely for 20 min. On day three, the mice
were allowed to explore the arena for 3 minutes in the presence
Materials and methods of the familiar object and a novel object videotaped ORT be-
havior consisted of counting the number of times the mouse ex-
Plant materials and preparation of decoction plored each object (exploration consisted of being within 0.7 cm
The fresh yellow leaves of quince (Cydonia oblonga around the object and/or touching it with the nose). Time spent
Miller.) were collected from Anbar Bozan village (35 27 N, exploring the familiar object was used as a measure of long
46 90 E and 1812 m above sea level), Abidar rural district, term recognition memory. To identify time spent attending to the
Kurdistan, Iran in October 2014 and authenticated by botanist. novel object the following discrimination ratio was calculated:
The voucher specimens were stored at the herbarium of our uni- B A/B + A wherein A = the time spent exploring old object, B
versity. The harvested leaves were washed with distilled water = the time spent exploring novel object. The ORT was used to
(DW) and then air-dried in the shade. Daily preparation of the assess the effect of QLD in associative learning and recognition
quince leaf decoction (QLD), consisted of dried leaves boiled in memory[10].
DW pot (600 ml) for two hours that preserved in a water bath
(100C). Lightdark box (LDB): The LDB apparatus consisted of two
vitreous boxes: one light chamber (272727 cm3) brightly illu-
Animal subjects minated and the other was dark chamber (272718 cm3). The
Male Naval Medical Research Institute (NMRI) mice, mice were allowed to move from one box to the other through
Mus musculus, were maintained under 45%55% relative hu- an interfacial gate. A mouse was put into the dark box facing the
midity, 12 h light: 12 h dark photocycle and temperature 25 2 hole for three seconds, after which the gate was opened allowing
C. The animals (2030 g) were divided to 4 groups (n = 10 for the mouse to transition at will between the light and dark box-
each group) housed in colony cages with free access to pelleted es for 5 minutes. The transition between the light and the dark
feed (Gharbdaneh Co., Iran) and tap water except throughout boxes and time spent in the light box were analyzed from video
behavioral tests. Animals in control group receive pelleted feed recording[11]. The LDB is a conventional test for assessment of
and gavaged daily by DW while animals in other three groups anxietylike behavior, specifically approach-avoidance conflict
treated with fresh QLD at dosages of 5, 10, and 20% of QLD anxiety in laboratory mice[11].
equivalent to Q0.92, Q1.85, and Q3.7, respectively when con-
verted dosages to grams per deciliter via gavage for 28 days. Morris water maze (MWM): The Morris water navigation task
The Animal Ethical Committee of Razi University reviewed and apparatus consisted of a plastic child swimming pool (111 cm in
approved this study. diameter and 35 cm in height) divided into four equal quadrants.
The pool was filled with drinking yoghurt (23C) to the depth
Behavioral endpoints of 15 cm and an invisible platform (514 cm2) was submerged
All tests were performed from 08:00 to 15:00 in a homogeneous- 1 cm below the opaque surface in the center of one of the quad-
ly lightened room. rants[12]. The pool was located in a test room with external cues
Open field test (OFT): The open field wooden apparatus positioned around the mazes that were visible from within the
(363636 cm3) consisted of a bright blue square floor marked maze. These cues were accessible to the mice as markers for
with 16 equal blocks and one red lined square in the center. At spatial orientation.
the beginning of the test, mice were positioned in the open field Each mouse was exposed to the pool for 2 min one day
apparatus facing one of the four corners. Mouse movement (lo- before training trials. The five training days consisted of each
comotion and rearing) was video recorded for 5 min[8]. Video animal receiving 4, 60-second trials per day, with 5 minutes in-
analysis of mouse behavior in the OFT consisted of counting tertrial intervals. A successful escape from the maze was count-
the number of squares crossed through, total time in movement, ed when the mouse was able to locate and climb on the invisible
time spent rearing (standing on feet) and the time spent in the platform. Once the mouse located the platform, it was permitted
central red square of the apparatus. The motobehaviors of mice to remain on it for 10 sec. If the mouse did not locate the plat-
was explored after QLD intake using an OFT[8,9]. form within 90 sec, it was placed on the platform for 15 sec and
then removed from the pool. The point of entry of the mouse into
Elevated plus maze (EPM): The wooden apparatus comprised the pool and the location of the platform for escape remained
two open arms (50 cm long 10 cm wide) and two closed arms unchanged between training trials. During the probe trial (sixth
(50 cm long 10 cm wide 40 cm height) perpendicular to each day) the platform was moved to a new quadrant and the mouse
other and situated 50 cm above the ground. Mice were placed was released into the quadrant opposite to the one that had pre-
in the center square and their behaviors were videotaped for viously contained the platform and allowed to swim for 1 min.
5 min[9]. Recordings were evaluated for total time spent in the During each trial, escape latencies (time to reach the platform)
open arms, total time spent in the closed arms, and entries into were videotaped for analysis. Escape latencies were averaged
the open and closed arms. The anxietyassociated behavior of for each session of trials and for each mouse[12]. The decrease
in escape latency from day to day represents longterm memo- Statistical analysis
ry or reference memory while that from trial to trial, represents
shortterm memory or working memory[12]. Escape latency on The results were expressed as means and standard error
the probe day represents the mouses ability to break free of their of the mean (SEM). The Shapiro Wilk test showed that all data
learned behavior to find the new platform position[12]. fitted a Gaussian distribution. When parametric analysis of vari-
ance revealed a significant difference, a post hoc Turkeys test
Biochemical assay was used to check the difference between groups. Significance
level was set at p < 0.05 and all statistical analyses were carried
Brain preparation: The mice were killed under deep anesthe- out using SPSS version 16.0 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, Illi-
sia with intraperitoneal injection of ketamine (100 mg/kg)/xyla- nois, USA).
zine (30 mg/kg) cocktail at the end of study, then mice were
decapitated and their whole brain removed, weighted and halved Results
through longitudinal fissure. For preparation of brain homoge-
nate, brain tissue was homogenized in 10 volumes of 0.9% w/v Behavioral endpoints
sodium chloride solution. The homogenate was centrifuged at
3000 g for 10 min and the supernatant was used to assay to- OFT. In OFT, number of crossing squares as an index of loco-
tal homogenate protein using bovine serum albumin as a stan- motor activity/horizontal activity (F3, 14 = 1.290; p = 0.326), the
dard[13], and brain AChE activity (vide infra). time of rearing as an index of exploratory activity/vertical activ-
ity (F3, 14 = 1.089; p = 0.394), and center arena time as an index
AChE assay: The AChE activity was measured according to of anxiety (F3, 14 = 0.292; p = 0.830); did not yield significant
Ellmans method[14] by providing an artificial substrate, ACh io- differences after QLD treatment (Table 1).
dide (0.075 M dissolved in DW; Merck Co. Germany). Choline
was released with the cleavage of ACh by AChE is allowed to Table 1: Open field behavior after oral intake of quince leaf decoction
react with SH reagent 2, 2Dinitro5, 5dithiodibenzoic acid in mice (n = 4 for each group)
(DTNB; 0.01 M; pH 8.0; Merck Co. Germany). The reduction Group
produced yellow color with absorption maximum at 412 nm. NC Q0.92 Q1.85 Q3.7
The brain homogenate (0.4 ml) was added to a cuvette contain- Crossing square no. 87.527.1 99.228.3 39.37.6 122.536.6
ing 2.6 ml phosphate buffer solution (0.1 M, pH 8.0) and 100 l
Rearing time (s) 19.29.1 12.76.6 1.00.5 3.01.4
of DTNB, mixed thoroughly by bubbling air, when absorbance
reached a stable value at 412 nm the basal reading was recorded. Center arenatime 3.02.5 2.71.7 1.00.5 20.29.5
(s)
After that, 20 l of substrate solution was added and change in
absorbance was recorded at 2-minute intervals for duration of 16
Note: NC = Normal control group, Q0.92 = Quince treated group at
minutes. The change in the absorbance ( Abs) per minute was dosage 0.92 g/dl, Q1.85 = Quince treated group at dosage 1.85 g/dl,
determined. Activity was calculated as follows: Activity (mol/ Q3.7 = Quince treated group at dosage at 3.7 g/dl.
min/mg) = ( Abs homogenate buffer vol.)/extinction coeffi-
cient time (min) homogenate protein (mg). EPM. In EPM, time spent in open arm (F3,15 = 1.44; p = 0.280),
number of entries into open arms (F3,15 = 1.706; p = 0.219), num-
Molecular docking simulation of AChE inhibition ber of entries into close arms (F3,15 = 1.915; p = 0.181), sum of
number of entries onto open and close arms (F3,15 = 1.813; p =
Simulations of the docking between the AChE and 0.198) and number of entries into open arms as a percent of all
major bioactive compound of QLD were performed with PyRx entries (F3,15 = 1.044; p = 0.409) did not show significant differ-
software version 0.8[15] through setting up and running up Aut- ence (Table 2).
oDockVINA[15] using default parameters. For the docking stud-
ies, crystal structures of the protein target were obtained from Table 2: Elevated plusmaze behavior after oral intake of quince leaf
the Protein Data Bank, PDB ID 1EVE for Tetronarce californica decoction in mice (n = 4 for each group)
AChE. The PDB format of target protein has been edited, opti- Group
mized and trimmed in Molegro Virtual Docker[16] and Chimera
NC Q0.92 Q1.85 Q3.7
1.8.1 (http://www.rbvi.ucsf.edu/chimera) before submission to
OT 32.7 7.7 40.00 4.49 33.00 8.55 53.70 10.7
PyRx (vide infra). The structures of the major known bioactive
compounds of quince leaves were retrieved from ChemSpider OE 10.2 2.0 9.25 1.49 7.75 2.28 16.00 4.3
(http://www.chemspider.com) and PubChem (https://pubchem. CE 11.2 2.0 9.00 1.58 7.75 1.75 16.50 4.6
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) databases. Binding affinity (kcal/mol) was TE 21.5 4.1 18.25 3.03 15.05 4.03 32.50 8.9
determined after completion of the docking procedure. More OE % 47.32 0.64 51.04 1.47 48.23 2.41 49.01 0.79
negative the binding affinity means a better orientation of the
ligand in the binding site. The selected conformer of ligand has Note: NC = Normal control group, Q0.92 = Quince treated group at
been combined with 1EVE protein in Molegro Virtual Docker[16] dosage 0.92 g/dl, Q1.85 = Quince treated group at dosage 1.85 g/dl,
or Chimera 1.8.1 (http://www.rbvi.ucsf.edu/chimera) and their Q3.7 = Quince treated group at dosage at 3.7 g/dl. OT: time (s) spent in
graphical interface has been analyzed with LigPlot+ software[17]. open arm, OE: number of entries into open arms, CE: number of entries
into close arms, TE: sum of number of entries onto open and close arms,
OE percent: OE/ OE+CE*100.
MWM: As shown in Figure. 1, the latencies to escape (s) af- Note: PC: PubChem ID; CS: ChemSpider ID
ter oral intake of QLD tended to be increased dosedependent-
ly in Q3.7 (51.256.73), Q1.85 (41.756.51), and Q0.92
(33.2515.09) groups as compared to NC group (32.813.18)
at 6th day, however this difference was not significant (F3,12 =
1.078; p = 0.406). Quince decoction had no improving effect on
spatial memory.
Conclusion ment of smoke of agarwood (Aquilaria spp.) in male rats. (2011) JABS
2: 045-053.
In conclusion, AChE activity in QLD-treated groups 11. Takao, K., Miyakawa, T. Light/dark transition test for mice. (2006)
J Vis Exp: JoVE (1): 104.
was less than 50 percent of activity in the control group, although
12. Ivani, S., Karimi, I., Tabatabaei, S.R. Biosafety of multi walled car-
we did not observe any memory improvement in QLD-treated bon nanotube in mice: a behavioral toxicological approach. (2012) J
groups. Quince decoction did not induce any toxic behavioral Toxicol Sci 37(6): 1191-1205.
effects in mice. High dosages of quince decoction followed a Pubmed | Crossref
hormetic dose response relationship and had inhibitory effects 13. Bradford, M.M. Rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of
on AChE. In this study, in silico molecular docking showed that microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of proteindye
quercetin3Ogalactoside, reported in QLD, has reasonable binding. (1976) Anal Biochem 72: 248254.
binding affinity for AChR and may become a novel therapeutic Pubmed | Crossref
candidate for the treatment of AD. To our knowledge, there is 14. Ellman, G.L., Courtney, K.D., Andres, V., et al. A new and rapid
colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. (1961) Bio-
not suitable database about the posology and pharmacokinetics
chem Pharmacol 7: 8895.
of QLD and this study is one of the first ones to reveal the phar- Pubmed | Crossref
macotherapeutic potential of leaves of quince. 15. Dallakyan, S., Olson, A.J. Smallmolecule library screening by
docking with PyRx. (2015) Methods Mol Biol 1263: 243450.
Acknowledgments Pubmed | Crossref
This paper emanates from Doctor of Veterinary Medi- 16. Thomsen, R., Christensen, M.H.MolDock: a new technique for
cine thesis of third author, School of Veterinary Medicine, Razi highaccuracy molecular docking. (2006) J Med Chem 49(11): 3315
University, Kermanshah, Iran. Authors acknowledge David Al- 3321.
imoradian and Mohammadmehdi Zanganeh for technical assis- Pubmed | Crossref
17. Laskowski, R.A., Swindells, M.B. LigPlot+: Multiple ligandpro-
tance. The in vivo part of this study was supported by a grant
tein interaction diagrams for drug discovery. (2011) J ChemInfModel
from Razi University while in silco part was supported by per- 51(10): 27782786.
sonal money of corresponding author. Pubmed | Crossref
18. Oliveira, A.P., Pereira, J.A., Andrade, P.B., et al. Phenolic profile of
Disclosures: The authors declared no conflicts of interest. Cydoniaoblonga Miller leaves. (2007) J Agr Food Chem 55(19): 7926-
7930.
References Pubmed | Crossref
19. Oliveira, A.P., Pereira, J.A., Andrade, P.B., et al. Organic acids
1. Jellen, L.C., Aliper, A., Buzdin, A., et al. Screening and personaliz- composition of Cydoniaoblonga Miller leaf. (2008) J Agr Food Chem
ing nootropic drugs and cognitive modulator regimens in silico. (2015) 111(2): 393-399.
Front Sys Neurosci 9: 4. Pubmed | Crossref
Pubmed | Crossref 20. Costa, R.M., Magalhes, A.S., Pereira, J.A., et al. Evaluation of
2. Parent, M.B., Baxter, M.G. Septohippocampal acetylcholine: in- free radical-scavenging and antihemolytic activities of quince (Cydonia
volved in but not necessary for learning and memory. (2004) Learn oblonga Miller) leaf: a comparative study with green tea (Camellia sin-
Memory11 (1): 9-20. ensis). (2009) Food Chem Toxicol 47(4): 860-865.
Pubmed | Crossref Pubmed | Crossref
3. Hasselmo M.E. The role of acetylcholine in learning and memory. 21. Carvalho, M., Silva, B.M., Silva, R. et al. First report on Cydonia
(2006) Curr Opin Neurobiol 16(6): 710-715. oblongaMiller anticancer potential: differential anti proliferative effect
Pubmed | Crossref against human kidney and colon cancer cells. (2010) J Agr Food Chem
4. Colovic, M.B., Krstic, D.Z., Lazarevic-Pasti, T.D., et al. Acetyl cho- 58(6): 3366-3370.
linesterase inhibitors: pharmacology and toxicology. (2013) Curr Neuro Pubmed | Crossref
pharmacol 11(3): 315-335. 22. Sussman, J.L., Harel, M., Frolow, F., et al. Atomic structure of ace-
Pubmed | Crossref tyl cholinesterase from Torpedo californica: a prototypic acetylcho-
5. Joshi Pranav, J.C. A review on natural memory enhancers (noot- line-binding protein. (1991) Science 253: 872-879.
ropics). (2013) Unique J Engin Advanced Sci(01): 8-18. Pubmed | Crossref
Crossref 23. Wonnacott, S. The paradox of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor up-
6. Vaez, H., Hamidi, S. Potential of Cydoniaoblonga leaves in cardio- regulation by nicotine. (1990) Trends Pharmacol Sci11 (6): 216-219.
vascular disease. (2014) Hypothesis 12(1), e4. Pubmed | Crossref
Crossref 24. Flood, J.F., Cherkin, A. Scopolamine effects on memory retention in
7. Sajid, S.M., Zubair, M., Waqas, M., et al. A review on quince (Cydo- mice: a model of dementia? (1986) Behav Neural Biol 45(2): 169-184.
niaoblonga): a useful medicinal plant. (2015) Glob Vet 14(4): 517524. Pubmed | Crossref
Crossref 25. De Tommasi, N., De Simone, F., Pizza, C., et al. New tetracyclic
8. Gholamine, B., Karimi, I., Salimi,A., et al. Neurobehavioral toxicity sesterterpenes from Cydonia vulgaris. (1996) J Nat Prod 59(3): 267-
of carbon nanotubes in mice: Focus on brain-derived neurotrophic fac- 270.
tor messenger RNA and protein. (2016) ToxicolInd Health May 26. pii: Crossref
0748233716644381. 26. Osman, A.G., Koutb, M., Sayed, A.E.D. Use of hematological pa-
9. Ivani, S., Karimi, I., Tabatabaei, S.R., et al. Effects of prenatal ex- rameters to assess the efficiency of quince (Cydonia oblonga Miller)
posure to single-wall carbon nanotubes on reproductive performance leaf extract in alleviation of the effect of ultravioletA radiation on Af-
and neurodevelopment in mice. (2014) ToxicolInd Health 32(7): 1293- rican catfish Clariasgariepinus (Burchell, 1822). (2010) J Photo chem
1301. Photobio B 99(1): 1-8.
Pubmed | Crossref Pubmed | Crossref
10. Miraghaee, S.S., Karimi, I., Becker, L.A. Psychobiological assess- 27. GranadoSerrano, A.B., Martn, M.A., IzquierdoPulido, M., et al.
Molecular mechanisms of () epicatechin and chlorogenic acid on the
www.ommegaonline.org 6 J Bioinfo Proteomics Rev |Volume 3: Issue 2
Nootropic Effects of Quince Leaf