Lutoslawski Musique Funebre
Lutoslawski Musique Funebre
Lutoslawski Musique Funebre
During Lutosawskis early artistic growth, the Nazi occupation of Poland (beginning in 1939) and the almost
immediate post-war encroachment of Soviet socialism seriously stunted the nascent emergence of a Polish avant-
garde, just as happened in Czechoslovakia and Hungary as they became increasingly isolated behind the Iron
Curtain. An official drive for Social Realism beginning in 1949 demanded that Polish composers use the materials
and even the philosophy of folk music as the basis for their own compositions. As a result, the modern and avant-
garde musicby Schoenberg or Webern, Stockhausen, Messiaen, or Boulezthat filtered into socialist Central and
Eastern Europe, via the airwaves or through individual contacts, introduced techniques that Lutosawski and others
could only explore underground or at risk of official reprobation.
Lutosawski (like Bartk) worked with folk music materials as a matter of artistic preference, although some folk-
music-based pieces were more acceptable than others within Soviet-influenced social realist strictures. His Concerto
for Orchestra (1950-54) was the culmination of his mature style in this vein, in which folk-like melodies are used in
conjunction within modern harmonic and contrapuntal contexts. This piece announced Lutosawski as the most
important Polish composer of his time, but after its success, Lutosawski continued to seek his personal voice.
A loosening of the restraints of the Soviet political and cultural influence in Poland came in 1955, as it had for many
countries in the years immediately following Joseph Stalins death in 1953. In 1956 the now-famous new music
festival Warsaw Autumn was established, and through it Lutosawski and his colleagues were introduced to a great
range of progressive music from Western Europe and the United States; Western composers, too, had a chance to
assess the best of Polish music. This interchange encouraged Lutosawski to bring to fruition his private explorations
in technique and form, initially centered on the twelve-tone system and a harmonic language based on twelve-note
chords. He moved further along the path of ultra-modernism after hearing a radio broadcast of John Cages Piano
Concerto in 1960, which led him to incorporate into his pieces a localized indeterminate (that is, chance) element.
This gave unpredictable and fluid surface to parts of his pieces, a facet that grew out of a concern for orchestral
color and texture (learned from Bartk, Debussy, and Stravinsky) rather than a Cage-like abandonment of traditional
large-scale form. Form, both in his early works and through his late style in the 1980s, was always at the heart of
Lutosawskis musical thinking. His mature style, which brings together all of these elements, is characterized in
addition by highly dramatic, contrasting musical gestures that have a strong sense of continuity with the music of
Bartk, Brahms, Beethoven, and Bach.
Lutosawski had already begun experimenting with the twelve-tone technique in the 1940s, but Funeral Music was
his first mature piece using the method. His use of the tone-row is informed by Weberns continuation of
Schoenbergspecifically here, the twelve pitches of the chromatic scale are used both as a single governing
harmony (a chord of twelve pitches), and as four groups of three pitches each, both as chords (vertically) and motifs
(horizontally). The basic three-note motif is a rising tritone plus a falling semitone, first heard as FBB-flat in the
first cello then in imitation as BFE in the second in the Prologue. We also hear this in retrograde (backwards)
formi.e., a rising semitone followed by a falling tritonein both cello parts immediately following their first three
pitches. This kind of chromatic motif is very much reminiscent of certain passages of the works dedicatee Bartk,
such as in the Music for Strings, Percussion, and Celesta, and the String Quartet No. 5. As the lines proceed in
canon, the prevailing harmonic sonorities are perfect fourths and tritones. The entirety of the Prologue is smooth,
linear counterpoint, somewhat lugubrious in mood.
The second movement, Metamorphoses, uses the same intervallic materials (versions of the row are somewhat
clear at the start of the movement), but the textures are very different, a series of increasingly active episodes with
first one, then each subsequent string section doubling its pulsefrom quarter-note to eighth-note to sixteenth. The
movement flows right into the next, Apogee, which as the title suggests is really the climax of the preceding
episode. Less than a minute long, this movement is a series of chords, fff, for the whole string body, surging, then
abating in energy to a held chord. The Epilogue, which ensues without pause, is similar to the Prologue but in
reverse, diminishing from full string orchestra to solo cello at the end, where we clearly hear the main motif (here as
AA-sharpE) giving way to entropy.
Robert Kirzinger
THE ONLY PREVIOUS BOSTON SYMPHONY PERFORMANCES OF LUTOSAWSKI'S "MUSIQUE
FUNBRE" TOOK PLACE IN OCTOBER 2007, UNDER THE DIRECTION OF CHRISTOPH VON
DOHNNYI. Over the years, BSO audiences have had an opportunity to hear a number of the composer's works,
including, among other things, the Symphony No. 3 (led here by Esa-Pekka Salonen in January 1988); "Chain 2" for
violin and orchestra (given its United States premiere in 1987 by BSO violinist Ronan Lefkowitz with the
Tanglewood Music Center Orchestra, Lefkowitz later repeating the work with the BSO as part of an all-Lutosawski
program led here by the composer in October 1990); the Symphony No. 4 (led here most recently by Seiji Ozawa in
February 1995 in memory of the composer, who had died the previous year); the Cello Concerto (played here by
Mstislav Rostropovich with Seiji Ozawa conducting in February 1987, and by Lynn Harrell under James Levine's
direction in November 2004), and the Concerto for Orchestra (led here most recently by Christoph von Dohnnyi in
April 2005).