Republic v. Molina, G.R. No. 108763, Feb. 13, 1997
Republic v. Molina, G.R. No. 108763, Feb. 13, 1997
Republic v. Molina, G.R. No. 108763, Feb. 13, 1997
FACTS:
The case at bar challenges the decision of CA affirming the marriage of the respondent
Roridel Molina to Reynaldo Molina void in the ground of psychological incapacity. The
couple got married in 1985, after a year, Reynaldo manifested signs of immaturity and
irresponsibility both as husband and a father preferring to spend more time with friends
whom he squandered his money, depends on his parents for aid and assistance and was
never honest with his wife in regard to their finances. In 1986, the couple had an
intense quarrel and as a result their relationship was estranged. Roridel quit her work
and went to live with her parents in Baguio City in 1987 and a few weeks later, Reynaldo
left her and their child. Since then he abandoned them.
ISSUE:
HELD:
The marriage between Roridel and Reynaldo subsists and remains valid. What
constitutes psychological incapacity is not mere showing of irreconcilable differences
and confliction personalities. It is indispensable that the parties must exhibit
inclinations which would not meet the essential marital responsibilities and duties due
to some psychological illness. Reynaldos action at the time of the marriage did not
manifest such characteristics that would comprise grounds for psychological incapacity.
The evidence shown by Roridel merely showed that she and her husband cannot get
along with each other and had not shown gravity of the problem neither its juridical
antecedence nor its incurability. In addition, the expert testimony by Dr Sison showed
no incurable psychiatric disorder but only incompatibility which is not considered as
psychological incapacity.
The following are the guidelines as to the grounds of psychological incapacity laid set
forth in this case: