Major Project Report
Major Project Report
Major Project Report
GROUP:
ASD5Dg
LECTURERS NAME:
ENCIK ZAILUDDIN BIN ARIFFIN
DATE OF EXPERIMENT:
19th AUGUST 2013
DATE OF SUBMISSION:
30th SEPTEMBER 2013
ABSTRACT:
INTRODUCTION:
The most common source for atomic absorption measurements is the hollow
cathode lamp. The cathode is made of metal of interest. It means that the different lamp for
each element. If the sample analyzed is potassium, so the hollow cathode lamp that will use
is potassium also. Hollow cathode lamp is used to maximize probability of redeposition on
cathode and also restricts the light direction. The detector used is photomultiplier tube which
can detect the element that need to be determined.
However, this instrument can detect varies element that range from parts per billion
(ppb) to parts per million (ppm). The advantages of using AAS are speed, convenience,
unusually high selectivity and moderate costs. The disadvantages are its sensitivity varies
with element, must maximize burner position and can detect only one element in one time.
In this experiment, the element analyzed is potassium in fertilizer. The fertilizer used
act as fruit inducer which the brands comes from Serbaguna, TST and Tani . Potassium is a
trace element found in fertilizer which is 17% by weight based on Nitrogen-Phosphorus-
Potassium (NPK) rating. Agriculture is the sector which uses the most amount of fertilizer for
plants production. There are many uses of potassium for plantation which are regulation of
water and nutrients movement in plant cells, promotes flowering and fruiting of the plants,
stimulates of an early growth, increases protein production, and improves resistances to
diseases and insects.
OBJECTIVES:
PROCEDURE:
M1V1 = M2V2
(1000ppm) V1 = (100ppm)(100mL)
V1 = (100ppm)(100mL)
(1000ppm)
V1 = 10 mL
2) Preparation of Standard solutions:
Standard 1 (1ppm),
M1V1 = M2V2
(100ppm) V1 = (1ppm)(50mL)
V1 = (1ppm)(50mL)
(100ppm)
V1 = 0.5 mL
=2.4106 mg X 0.25 L
L
= 0.60265 mg X 100
2.505 g
= 24.06 %
This experiment was conducted to determine the actual amount of potassium in three
different brands of fertilizers and to compare the experimental results with the values listed
on the manufacturers label. In this experiment, we use fertilizer as a sample from brand of
Tani, TST and Serbaguna. After it was grounded, we weighed approximately about 2.5 g
and dissolved it with 150 mL deionized water . Then, the solution was boiled for 30 minutes
to dissolved the fertilizer completely. The solution of sample was diluted and filtered to
remove precipitate in the solution in order to obtain clear solution.
When boiling process occur, the colour of sample solution from brand Tani is brown-
grey, TST is light blue while Serbaguna is very light blue. Dilution process was done for
three times. This dilution method is called dilution factor. The dilution process give colourless
solution for three samples. In order to obtained the concentration of sample in the standard
range, 5.90 mL from dilution in 100 mL volumetric flask was measured and diluted in 250 mL
volumetric flask. Two set of trials for every brands were conducted to compare which result
is the best one and also to see whether the condition of sample is change. The samples are
run for three times for one set of trial to get the average reading as recorded in Table 1.
The standard solution was prepared for five different concentrations which are 1
ppm, 3 ppm, 5 ppm, 7 ppm and 9 ppm. This standard solution was run to obtained
correlation coefficient that is 0.9991 before run the samples. This result can be shown from
graph of standard calibration curve which the absorption is directly proportional to the
concentration.
The percentage by weight of potassium for every brands of fertilizer were calculated
and compare to manufacturers label. The amount of potassium calculated is shown in Table
2 which are more than 17% by weight when compared with manufacturers label. However,
fertilizer from brand Serbaguna has a higher amount of potassium than the two brands for
two sets.The values obtained were shows a greater differences from label because of some
error while carried this experiment. First, the three samples are not grinded very well and
same size. This gives difference rate of reaction as difference surface area. Maybe some of
potassium does not breaks down completely and gives different amount of potassium.
Second, the solution was measured by using measuring cylinder which gives inaccurate
value. Third error is there have a slight variations in the eyes level while taking measurement
in measuring cylinder and burette which means eyes is not perpendicular to meniscus in
these apparatus.
The result shows that the concentration of potassium and weight of sample are
precise among three runs of both sets. The percent by weight also gives similar values for
both sets. In order to get this precision values, some precautions are needed to be aware
and take note. All glasswares used such as burette, beaker, volumetric flask and so on must
be rinsed and calibrated first before using them. The burette was ensured that there is no
bubble in the tip that will affect the reading obtained. . For this experiment, do not use
distilled water to dilute the standard and the sample, but use deionized water for dilution.
Deionized water is used in this experiment because it does not contain any charge. So that,
there is no attraction between difference charge of ion and thus affect the result. The scale
of the analytical balance must be set correctly based on the experiment.
CONCLUSION:
The amount of potassium that contains in the fertilizer for brand Tani, TST and Serbaguna is
24.06%, 2.80% and 85.76% by weight respectively for the first set. For second set, the
amount of potassium in three different brands is 24.13%, 2.80%, and 85.52%. Fertilizer from
Serbaguna shows the larger amount of potassium compared fertilizer from TST and Tani.
REFERENCES:
1) Analytical Methods for Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy, 12th August 2013, retrieved
from,
http://www.lasalle.edu/~prushan/Intrumental%20Analysis_files/AA-
Perkin%20Elmer%20guide%20to%20all!.pdf
3) D.A. Skoog, D.M. West, F.J. Holler, S.R. Crouch, Fundamentals of Analytical
Chemistry(8th Edition), Chapter 28: Atomic Spectroscopy, page 839-863.