Pad Eye Design With Side Load 25

MAXIMUM REACH ENTERPRISES
1853 Wellington Court

Henderson, NV 89014
Ph: 702 547 1564
kent.goodman @ cox.net
www.maximumreach.com
27 August 2014
PAD EYE LUG DESIGN WITH A SIDE LOAD

As design engineers, it is our responsibility to make sure that our lug designs meet the latest codes before they
are issued for fabrication, but due to the variables in fabrication, installation, field implementation, etc, the
designs might not fit right or be used right to code. That is why we use an impact factor (IF) or a safety factor,
ie, it is recommended to always use at least a 1.8 IF.
One of the ways that lifting lugs are used outside of code is when the field allows side loading in the weak axis.
Very seldom are lugs designed for a side load in the weak axis, so the rule the field should go by is Do not side
load lugs in the weak axis. This is especially detrimental and dangerous for pad eye lugs because the side load
on the lug causes the weld on the load side to act as a hinge and the weld on the back side away from the load
sees most of the stress. Also the QC on the welds is very critical, ie, making sure there is no porosity, weld
sizes are per the drawing, etc. Over stressing the weld on the back side can cause sudden failure to occur where
the pad eye lug rips off.
I have checked enough Heavy Lift Contractors (HLC) rigging drawings to know that sometimes their rigging
engineers/ superintendents dont think that a little side load in the weak axis on a lug is serious, ie, a lot of HLC
use spreader bars that have inserts that bolt together to lengthen or shorten the overall length. The inserts are
usually one meter or longer in length, so it is hard to make sure that the lift slings will be vertical. Fluor uses
pipe spreader bars with end caps so that the inserts can be cut to length to ensure that the lift slings are vertical.
The purpose of this presentation is to show how to design a pad eye lug so that it will have reserve strength
against side loading in the weak axis. Two methods will be shown:
METHOD 1:
A gusset can be added to the rear of the lug as shown in the sketch below. This will provide sufficient strength
for a side load up to 5 degrees. Note that the pad eye lug program calculates lug properties where:
E = Eccentricity
F = force on the lug
R = radius of the lug
S = Min. thickness of the support base which is equal to or greater than W
T = Thickness of the lug and gusset
w = Pad weld size
W = Lug weld size
The width of the lug is 2*R

The width of the gusset is a minimum of 2*R
METHOD 2:
A pad eye lug can be designed with some reserve strength by taking into account a side load in the weak axis.
The example below shows how to calculate the stresses in the lug plate and in the weld for a 40 kips side load at
10 in the weak axis.
The printout below shows the design for a pad eye lug without any side load, but it is the basis for calculating
the additional stresses that a side load imposes on the lug plate and the weld. Note the combined stress of the
lug plate and the weld size are circled in the printout.
The drawing below shows the details of the pad eye lug that agrees with the printout above and also shows the
side load information, ie, 40 kips at a 10 side load angle.
NOW CALCULATE THE ADDITIONAL STRESS IMPOSED ON THE LUG PLATE DUE TO THE
SIDE LOAD:
Refer to the printout and drawing above.

Where:
The force on the lug P at 10 deg. angle = 40.00 kips
The horizontal component of the side load force Ph = 6.95 kips
The force on the lug in the strong axis = 39.39 kips
The angle of the force in the strong axis of the lug = 60 deg.
Angle of the force in the weak axis = 10 deg.
The eccentricity = 3.5 inches
The allowable yield stress Fb in bending of the A36 plate = 36 ksi*.6 = 21.6 ksi
The allowable yield stress Ft in tension of the A36 plate = 21.6 ksi
The section modulus Sx for bending in the strong axis is
2 (thickness of the lug) * 7 (width of the lug)^2/6 = 16.33 cu. in.
The section modulus Sz for bending in the weak axis is
7 * 2^2/6 = 4.67 cu. in.
Bending moment Mz in the weak axis is
3.5 eccentricity *6.95 kips Ph * 1.8 (Impact factor IF) = 43.79 k-in.
Bending stress fbz in the weak axis is
43.79 k-in/4.67 cu.in. = 9.38 ksi
The ratio of the the bending stress fbz to the allowable bending stress is
9.38/21.6 = 0.43
From the printout above note that the combined stress for
the lug plate without any side load = 0.55
To get the total combined stress on the lug plate in the strong
axis and the weak axis, add 0.55 + 0.43 = 0.98 > 1.0 == Good
Therefore the lug plate is good for the 10 side load
NOW CALCULATE THE ADDITIONAL WELD REQUIRED AT THE BASE OF THE LUG PLATE
DUE TO THE SIDE LOAD:
Method 1:
The section modulus Sz for the weld treated as a line in the weak direction is
2 lug thickness * 7lug width = 14.00 sq. in.
Bending moment in the weak axis is
1.8 IF * 6.95 kips Ph * 3.5 eccentricity = 43.79 k-in
The bending stress is
M/Sz = 43.79 k-in/14.00 sq. in. = 3.13 k/in
From the printout, note that the resultant force Fr on the weld
without any side load. = 12.25 k/in
Therefore, the total resulting force on the weld = 12.25 k/in + 3.13 k/in = 15.38 k/in
The minimum required weld size using an allowable force on the weld of 14.85 k/in is
15.38 k/in / 14.85 k/in = 1.04 in
Recommend using 1 1/8 weld size
Method 2: My preferred method as it is usually more conservative.
Calculate the vertical force F that the weld on the back side of the lug will
see due to the side load.
F = 43.79 k-in bending moment / 1 ( width of lug) = 43.79 k
Now, the additional weld required due to the side load is
43.79 k/(14.85 k/in*7width of lug) = 0.42
Therefore the total weld size required is 0.82 (from the printout) + 0.42 = 1.24 in
Recommend using a 1 1/4 weld size
COMMENTS:
1. Note that the side load was taken at the center of the lug hole. If the shackle pin is a tight fit in the lug
hole, then the side lug force will occur up at the bail of the shackle (probably more to the side of the
bail) instead of at the center of the lug hole and the eccentricity or moment arm should be taken from the
base of the lug to bearing on the shackle bail or there about, ie, for a 25 Te shackle the eccentricity
would then be +/- 8.02 + 3.5 = +/-11.52. In this example, the additional eccentricity would over
stress the lug plate and would require a very large weld size. The proof of this is left up to the reader.
2. This is why it is strongly recommended that pad eye lugs not be side loaded, because if they are it is
usually hard to determine the correct moment arm to use to be conservative.
END OF PAD EYE CHECK FOR A SIDE LOAD

Pad Eye Design With Side Load 25

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pad Eye Design With Side Load 25

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pad Eye Design With Side Load 25

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

MAXIMUM REACH ENTERPRISES

1853 Wellington Court

PAD EYE LUG DESIGN WITH A SIDE LOAD

The width of the lug is 2*R

Refer to the printout and drawing above.

Therefore the lug plate is good for the 10 side load

15.38 k/in / 14.85 k/in = 1.04 in

Recommend using 1 1/8 weld size

Method 2: My preferred method as it is usually more conservative.

F = 43.79 k-in bending moment / 1 ( width of lug) = 43.79 k

Now, the additional weld required due to the side load is

43.79 k/(14.85 k/in*7width of lug) = 0.42

Recommend using a 1 1/4 weld size

END OF PAD EYE CHECK FOR A SIDE LOAD

You might also like