100% found this document useful (1 vote)
160 views3 pages

Ruben Reyna and Lloyd Soria, G.R. No. 167219 Present

This document is a Supreme Court of the Philippines case regarding whether the Land Bank of the Philippines has the authority to write-off uncollectible loans from its books. The court found that while write-off is not expressly granted in Land Bank's charter, it can be implied from its general banking powers. Write-off allows a bank to maintain accurate accounting of assets by removing debts that cannot be collected, but does not actually discharge the debtor's legal liability. Therefore, the court ruled that Land Bank could write-off the uncollectible loans in question for accounting purposes, but this did not release the petitioners from their underlying legal obligation to repay the debts.

Uploaded by

karl
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
160 views3 pages

Ruben Reyna and Lloyd Soria, G.R. No. 167219 Present

This document is a Supreme Court of the Philippines case regarding whether the Land Bank of the Philippines has the authority to write-off uncollectible loans from its books. The court found that while write-off is not expressly granted in Land Bank's charter, it can be implied from its general banking powers. Write-off allows a bank to maintain accurate accounting of assets by removing debts that cannot be collected, but does not actually discharge the debtor's legal liability. Therefore, the court ruled that Land Bank could write-off the uncollectible loans in question for accounting purposes, but this did not release the petitioners from their underlying legal obligation to repay the debts.

Uploaded by

karl
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

RUBEN REYNA and LLOYD SORIA, G.R. No.

167219
Petitioners,
Present:
CORONA, C.J.,
CARPIO,
CARPIO MORALES,
VELASCO, JR.,
NACHURA,*
LEONARDO-DE CASTRO,
BRION,
- versus - PERALTA,
BERSAMIN,
DEL CASTILLO,
ABAD,
VILLARAMA, JR.,
PEREZ,
MENDOZA, and
SERENO, JJ.

Promulgated:
COMMISSION ON AUDIT,
Respondent. February 8, 2011

While the power to write-off is not expressly granted in the charter of


the Land Bank, it can be logically implied, however, from the Land Bank's
authority to exercise the general powers vested in banking institutions as
provided in the General Banking Act (Republic Act 337). The clear
intendment of its charter is for the Land Bank to be clothed not only with the
express powers granted to it, but also with those implied, incidental and
necessary for the exercise of those express powers.[51]

As an accounting strategy, the use of write-off is a task that can help a


company maintain a more accurate inventory of the worth of its current
assets. In general banking practice, the write-off method is used when an
account is determined to be uncollectible and an uncollectible expense is
recorded in the books of account. If in the future, the debt appears to be
collectible, as when the debtor becomes solvent, then the books will be
adjusted to reflect the amount to be collected as an asset. In turn, income
will be credited by the same amount of increase in the accounts receivable.

Write-off is not one of the legal grounds for extinguishing an


obligation under the Civil Code.[53] It is not a compromise of liability.
Neither is it a condonation, since in condonation gratuity on the part of the
obligee and acceptance by the obligor are required. [54] In making the write-
off, only the creditor takes action by removing the uncollectible account
from its books even without the approval or participation of the debtor.
Furthermore, write-off cannot be likened to a novation, since the
obligations of both parties have not been modified. [55] When a write-off
occurs, the actual worth of the asset is reflected in the books of accounts of
the creditor, but the legal relationship between the creditor and the debtor
still remains the same the debtor continues to be liable to the creditor for the
full extent of the unpaid debt.
Based on the foregoing, as creditor, Land Bank may write-off in its
books of account the advance payment released to REMAD in the interest of
accounting accuracy given that the loans were already uncollectible. Such
write-off, however, as previously discussed, does not equate to a release
from liability of petitioners.

You might also like