Thermodynamic Optimization of Screw Compressors
Thermodynamic Optimization of Screw Compressors
2 (51) - 2009
Series I: Engineering Sciences
THERMODYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION OF
SCREW COMPRESSORS
Camelia POPA1
1
Dunrea de Jos University of Galai.
382 Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braov Vol. 2 (51) 2009 Series I
Among the optimization methods In addition, the maximum delivery per unit
frequently used in engineering are steepest size or weight of the machine must be
descent, Newtons method, Davidson accompanied by minimum power
FletcherPowells method, random search, utilization for a compressor and maximum
grid search method, search along power output for an expander. This implies
coordinate axes, Powells method, Hooke that the efficiency of the energy
Reavess method. A widely used method interchange between the fluid and the
for optimization of functions with several machine is a maximum. Accordingly
optima is the genetic algorithm. It requires unavoidable losses such as fluid leakage
only a value of the target function and it and energy losses must be kept to a
can conveniently handle discontinuities, minimum. Therefore, increased leakage
however this method is slow in converging may be more than compensated by greater
to a solution. Alternatively a constrained bulk fluid flow rates. However,
simplex method, known as Box complex specification of the required compressor
method can be conveniently used. Box delivery rate requires simultaneous
complex method was therefore used here optimization of the rotor size and speed to
to find the local minima, which were input minimize the compressor weight while
to an expanding compressor database. This maximizing its efficiency. Finally, for oil-
finally served to estimate a global flooded compressors, the oil injection flow
minimum. That database may be used later rate, inlet temperature and position needs
in conjunction with other results to to be optimized. It follows that a
accelerate the minimization. The multivariable minimization procedure is
constrained simplex method emerged form needed for screw compressor design with
the evolutionary operation method which the optimum function criterion comprising
was introduced already in the 1950s by a weighted balance between compressor
[1,2]. The basic idea is to replace the static size and efficiency or specific power.
operation of a process by a continuous and
systematic scheme of slight perturbations 2. Minimization Method Used in Screw
in the control variables. Compressor Optimization
The effect of these perturbations is
evaluated and the process is shifted in the The power and capacity of contemporary
direction of improvement. The basic computers is only just sufficient to enable a full
simplex method was originally developed multivariable optimization of both the rotor
for evolutionary operation, but it was also profile and the whole compressor design to be
suitable for the constrained simplex performed simultaneously in one pass.
method. Its main advantage is that only a The optimization of a screw compressor
few starting trials are needed, and the design is generically described as a
simplex immediately moves away from multivariable constrained optimization
unsuitable trial conditions. problem. The task is to maximize a target
There are several criteria for screw function f (x1 , x 2 ,..., x n ) , subjected
profile optimization which are valid simultaneously to the effects of the explicit
irrespective of the machine type and duty. and implicit constraints and limits:
Thus, an efficient screw machine must
admit the highest possible fluid flow rates g i xi hi , i = 1, n
for a given machine rotor size and speed.
and
This implies that the fluid flow cross-
sectional area must be as large as possible. g i y i hi , i = 1, n + 1, m
Camelia POPA: Thermodynamic Optimization of Screw Compressors 383
respectively, where the implicit variables In the early 1960s, a method called the
y n+1 , y m are dependent functions of xi . simplex method emerged as an empirical
The constraints g i and hi are either method for optimization, this should not be
confused with the simplex method for
constants or functions of the variables xi . linear programming. The simplex method
When attempting to optimize a compressor was later extended by [3] to handle
design a criterion for a favorable result constrained problems. This constrained
must be decided, for instance the minimum simplex method was appropriately called
power consumption, or operation cost. the complex method, from constrained
However, the power consumption is simplex. Since then, several versions have
coupled to other requirements which been used. Here, the basic working idea is
should be satisfied, for example a low outlined for the complex method used. If
compressor price, or investment cost. The the nonlinear problem is to be solved, it is
problem becomes obvious if the necessary to use k points in a simplex,
requirement for low power consumption where k = 2n . These starting points are
conflicts with the requirement of low randomly generated so that both the
compressor price. For a designer, the implicit and explicit conditions in are
balance is often completed with sound
judgment. For an optimization program the satisfied. Let the points x h and x g be
balance must be expressed in numerical defined by
values. This is normally done with weights
on the different parts of the target function. ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
f x h = max f x1 , f x 2 ,..., f x k
f (x ) = min f (x ), f (x ),..., f (x )
An important issue for real-world g 1 2 k
(1)
optimization problems is constraints. In the
general case, there are two types of
constraints, explicit or implicit. The 3. Calculation of Thermodynamic
explicit ones are limitations in the range of Processes in Screw Compressor
optimized parameters, for example Optimization.
available component sizes. These two
different constraints can, in theory, be The algorithm of the thermodynamic
handled more or less in the same way. In and flow processes used in optimization
practice, however, they are handled calculations is based on a mathematical
differently. model comprising a set of equations which
The implicit constraints are often more describe the physics of all the processes
difficult to manage than explicit within the screw compressor. The
constraints. The most convenient and most mathematical model gives an instantaneous
common way is to use penalty functions operating volume, which changes with
and thus incorporate the constraints in the rotation angle or time, together with the
objective function. Another way is to tell differential equations of conservation of
the optimization algorithm when the mass and energy flow through it, and a
evaluated point is invalid and generate a number of algebraic equations defining
new point according to some phenomena associated with the flow.
predetermined rule. Generally, it can be These are applied to each process that the
said that constraints, especially implicit fluid is subjected to within the machine;
constraints, make the optimization problem namely, suction, compression and
harder to solve, since it reduces the discharge. The set of differential equations
solution space. thus derived cannot be solved analytically
in closed form. In the past, various
384 Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braov Vol. 2 (51) 2009 Series I
simplifications have been made to the cycle are derived from the internal energy
equations in order to expedite their and the volume and the computation is
numerical solution. The present model is carried out through several cycles until the
more comprehensive and it is possible to solution converges. The working fluid can
observe the consequences of neglecting be any gas or liquidgas mixture, i.e. any
some of the terms in the equations and to ideal or real gas or liquidgas mixture of
determine the validity of such assumptions. known properties. The model accounts for
This provision gives more generality to the heat transfer between the gas and
model and makes it suitable for compressor and for leakage through the
optimization applications. A feature of the clearances in any stage of the process. The
model is the use the energy equation in the model works independently of the
form which results in internal energy rather specification of compressor geometry.
than enthalpy as the derived variable. This Liquid can be injected during any of the
was found to be computationally more compressor process stages. The model also
convenient, especially when evaluating the takes in consideration the gas solubility in
properties of real fluids because their the injected fluid. The thermodynamic
temperature and pressure calculation is not equations of state and change of state of
explicit. However, since the internal the fluid and the constitutive relationships
energy can be expressed as a function of are included in the model. The following
the temperature and specific volume only, forms of the conservation equations have
pressure can be calculated subsequently been employed in the model. The
directly. All the remaining thermodynamic conservation of internal energy is:
and fluid properties within the machine
dU dV
= m& in hin m& out hout + Q& p (2)
d d
m& in hin = m& suc hsuc + m& l , g hl , g + m& oil hoil (3)
where R and are gas constant and adiabatic. Isothermal Wt and adiabatic
isentropic exponent respectively. In the work Wa and are given here for ideal gas.
case of a real gas, u = f1 (T , v ) and
p = f 2 (T , v ) are known functions and
should be solved to obtain the fluid
m = min mout , Wind = Vdp
cycle
(12)
Dynamic Friction
drag
Loss
Loss
Leakage
Volumetric
Oil flow
Shaft speed
Fig. 1. Influence of the compressor shaft Fig. 2. Influence of the injected oil flow
speed upon the compressor volumetric upon leakage and friction drag losses
and dynamic losses