Women's Leadership and Participation: Overview
Women's Leadership and Participation: Overview
Women's Leadership and Participation: Overview
Womens
Leadership and
Participation
Overview
Introduction
Why support womens participation and leadership?
Throughout both the developing and the developed world,
women carry a disproportionately high burden of poverty.
This poverty is experienced not just as material deprivation,
but also as marginalisation, which means that those living in
poverty often have no, or little opportunity to influence the
political, economic, and social processes and institutions
which control and shape their lives and keep them trapped
in a cycle of poverty.
For poor women, this experience of marginalisation is
effectively doubled: not only do they belong to communities
that exist on the edges of society, but they are also often
denied a voice within the states, markets, communities, and
households in which they live, dominated as they are by
men and male interests. This lack of voice functions as a
critical factor in the maintenance of gender inequality and
poverty, effectively blocking womens access to decision-
making and agenda-setting processes, and beyond that,
opportunities for leading these processes. This situation
contributes to an invisibility of women as public actors and
constitutes a negation of their rights to equal participation. It
also perpetuates a decision-making process which is less
likely to represent womens interests than a more
representative system and which, therefore, possesses
neither the vision nor the motivation to challenge or change
unequal gender relations in society.
Womens equal participation and leadership in decision-making
processes at every level and in every sector is therefore fundamental
to attempts to eliminate gender-based poverty. In order to challenge
the unequal and ultimately unsustainable economic and social
systems in which we live, and to secure the essential resources they
need for dignified and rewarding lives, it has been argued that
women needto be visible politically as women and be empowered
to act in that capacity, becausetheyhave needs and attitudes on
vital issues which differ from those of men. 1 Womens presence in
significant numbers in elected bodies and in economic institutions
can result in more equitable policy outcomes because it is likely to
encourage policy makers to give more attention to issues affecting
women, such as equal pay, better conditions of employment, child-
care, violence against women, and unpaid labour. 2 And economic
policies are also more likely to acknowledge the value of unpaid
caring work (most of which is done by women) as an economic asset
to be maintained and developed.
For instance, in Norway, women members of Parliament brought
about the politics of care, which obligates the state to increase
publicly sponsored child-care services, extend parental leave and
flexible working, and improve pension rights for carers. 3 In South
Africa, women parliamentarians have led the world in the process of
introducing gender budgeting to analyse state spending from a
gender perspective and allocate resources to womens needs. 4 While
having more women in leadership positions does not guarantee
womens concerns will be on the agenda, there is evidence that once a
critical mass of women over one-third is in power, their shared
interests as women start to come to the fore, as these two examples
illustrate. 5
Not only is womens participation and leadership an essential
prerequisite for poverty alleviation and tackling gender inequality, it
is also a basic human right. International human-rights treaties and
conventions such as the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms
of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), 6 the Beijing Platform
for Action, 7 and the third Millennium Development Goal on gender
equality, recognise that women have the right to participate equally
with men at all levels and in all aspects of public life and decision-
making, whether it is deciding how the household income is spent or
determining how the country is run, and such conventions commit
signatories to realising this goal.
Despite these commitments to promoting gender equality in formal
structures of representation and decision-making, women continue to
be under-represented in all areas of decision-making and face
significant barriers to their full and equal participation in the
structures and institutions that govern, and directly affect, their lives.
Political institutions
In almost all countries, women have now won the right to vote. Yet
there are still scandalously few women in positions of political
leadership. Globally, just 17.4 per cent of national political
representatives are female, and only 15 out of 193 countries
worldwide have achieved 30 per cent women in national
governments. 12 In addition, globally, just 3.5 per cent of senior
ministerial positions are held by women, meaning that at the top
levels of government, women currently have little opportunity to
shape policy. 13 Lower down, in the regional and sub-regional
government institutions which often play an important role in
determining access to essential services and resources, women
remain conspicuous by their absence. Women coming from poor
backgrounds, or belonging to ethnic or other minority groups (based
for instance on their sexual identity, (dis)ability, or HIV status) are
particularly under-represented in formal political structures.
However, there are signs of improvement. Since 1995, the average
proportion of women in national assemblies has almost doubled.
There has been considerable progress in some parts of Africa. Six
African countries now have better profiles for womens
representation than the Europe/OSCE (Organization for Security and
Co-operation in Europe) countries (excluding the Scandinavian
countries). 14 The recent arrival to power of women heads of state
such as Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf in Liberia and Michelle Bachelet in Chile
also indicates growing acceptance of the legitimacy of women
leaders. Bachelets election in particular provides hope, given that she
campaigned on an openly pro-gender equality and womens rights
Civil-society institutions
Because of womens historic lack of presence in formal government
and the structural barriers they face in entering the political sphere,
many women have sought leadership positions within civil-society
organisations, as a means of finding alternative ways to forge the
changes and obtain the responses they seek. 15 In an example from
Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories included here, poor
Israeli-Arab women who are marginalised within their own
communities, as well as within Israeli society more generally, have
been able to secure influence through their activism within a civil-
society organisation campaigning on rights for the unemployed.
However, even in NGOs and community-based organisations which
claim to represent the community, women are much less likely to be
leaders than men, and womens shared interests are less likely to be
on the agenda. Community-based organisations may also end up
being dominated by the interests of more powerful, wealthy
members of the community, again marginalising poorer womens
priorities and experiences. Women have founded their own
organisations in response to this, yet these are often sidelined from
policy processes involving civil-society organisations, and again, may
reflect the interests of women who are already in relative positions of
influence and power, rather than those lower down the social scale.
Conclusion
Programmes aimed at strengthening womens leadership and
participation will have limited impact unless the structures that
uphold gender inequality, and other forms of inequality, begin to
change. In addition to projects directly supporting women to
participate actively in the economic, political, and civil-society
sectors, many of the programmes described in these case studies have
sought to challenge: unrepresentative governance and electoral
systems that are not accountable to voters; organisational structures
that reinforce male control and influence; and the economic
discrimination that women face. For such challenges to be successful,
men must be brought on board at all levels to accept the idea of
1
A.G. Jnasdttir (1988) On the concept of interests, women's interests and
the limitation of interest theory, in K. B. Jones and A. G. Jnasdttir (eds.)
The Political Interests of Gender, London: Sage Publications.
2
Womens Environment & Development Organisation (WEDO),
www.wedo.org (last accessed January 2008).
3
Womens Environment & Development Organisation (WEDO) 50/50
Campaign Kit, www.wedo.org/campaigns.aspx?mode=5050campaignkit
(last accessed January 2008).
4
M. Fleschman (2002) Gender budgets seek more equity. Improved
spending priorities can benefit all Africans, Africa Recovery 16:1,
www.un.org/ecosocdev/geninfo/afrec/vol16no1/161wm.htm (last accessed
January 2008).
5
For a review of the literature on the importance of a achieving a critical
mass of women in political institutions, see S. Grey (2001) Women and
parliamentary politics. Does size matter? Critical mass and women MPs in
the New Zealand House of Representatives, Paper for the 51st Political
Studies Association Conference, 1012 April 2001, Manchester, United
Kingdom, www.capwip.org/readingroom/nz_wip.pdf (last accessed January
2008).
6
The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against
Women (CEDAW), adopted in 1979 by the UN General Assembly, is often
described as an international bill of rights for women. Consisting of a
preamble and 30 articles, it defines what constitutes discrimination against
women and sets up an agenda for national action to end such discrimination
(www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/cedaw.htm last accessed
December 2007).
7
The Beijing Platform for Action, signed at the UN Fourth Conference on
Women in Beijing in 1995, commits 189 signatory governments to take
measures to ensure womens equal access to and full participation in
decision-making and leadership. These measures include [establishing]
the goal of gender balance in governmental bodies and committees, as well
as in public administrative entities, and in the judiciary, including setting
targets and implementing measures to substantially increase the number of
women with a view to achieving equal representation of women and men, if
necessary through positive action, in all governmental and public
administration positions. (www.wedo.org/campaigns.aspx?mode=5050
campaignkit last accessed December 2007). This pledge was reiterated in
2006 at the 50th Commission on the Status of Women.
8
African Women Are Ready to Lead, Africa Renewal, July 2006, 7.
9
Womens Environment & Development Organisation (WEDO) The
numbers speak for themselves, Fact Sheet no. 1,
www.wedo.org/files/numbersspeak_factsh1.pdf (last accessed January
2008).
10
http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/2007/womenceos/
(last accessed January 2008).
Online ISBN 978-1-84814-002-8. This paper is part of a set Learning for Action
on Women's Leadership and Participation available for purchase from Oxfam
Publishing or its agents, print ISBN 978-0-85598-626-1 for the set of 9 papers plus
the Useful Resources section. For more information visit
http://publications.oxfam.org.uk/oxfam/display.asp?ISBN=9780855986261
Oxfam GB
Oxfam GB is a development, relief, and campaigning organisation that
works with others to find lasting solutions to poverty and suffering around the
world. Oxfam GB is a member of Oxfam International.
Oxfam House
John Smith Drive
Cowley
Oxford
OX4 2JY
Tel: +44.(0)1865.473727
E-mail: [email protected]
www.oxfam.org.uk