10-07-08 Marina v LA County (BS109420) Complaint Filed with US Attorney Office, Los Angeles, against Judge David Yaffe and Sheriff Lee Baca - for Public Corruption and Deprivation of Rights in Imprisonment of Richard Fine s
10-07-08 Marina v LA County (BS109420) Complaint Filed with US Attorney Office, Los Angeles, against Judge David Yaffe and Sheriff Lee Baca - for Public Corruption and Deprivation of Rights in Imprisonment of Richard Fine s
10-07-08 Marina v LA County (BS109420) Complaint Filed with US Attorney Office, Los Angeles, against Judge David Yaffe and Sheriff Lee Baca - for Public Corruption and Deprivation of Rights in Imprisonment of Richard Fine s
by Joseph Zernik
Human Rights Alert DN: cn=Joseph
Zernik, o, ou,
PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750 email=jz12345@e
Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net arthlink.net, c=US
Date: 2010.07.08
Blog: http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ 17:35:28 +03'00'
Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
10-07-07 In re: Richard Fine - Complaint against Judge David Yaffe, Los Angeles Superior Court, and Los
Angeles Sheriff Lee Baca and others – for Public Corruption and Deprivation of Rights.
1. Complainants
Joseph Zernik, PhD, resident of Los Angeles County, California
Human Rights Alert (NGO)
Mailing Address: PO Box 526, La Verne, California 91750
Tel: 323-515-4583
Fax: (preferred) 323-488-9697
Email: (preferred) jz12345@earthlink.net
2. Accused:
a) DAVID YAFFE - Judge,
b) CHARLES MCCOY – Presiding Judge,
c) JOHN A CLARKE - Clerk,
d) FREDERIC BENNETT – Counsel
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
Address: Stanley Mosk Courthouse, 110 North Grand Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90012
e) LEE BACA – Sheriff of Los Angeles County
Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department
Address: 4700 Ramona Blvd, Monterey Park, CA 91754
Work: 323-526-5000
Fax: 323-267-6600
Email: shb@lasd.org , webemail@lasd.org
4. General Claims:
It is alleged that conduct of the accused amounted to:
a) Public Corruption
b) Fraud,
c) Wire/fax Fraud,
d) Honest Services Fraud,
e) Extortion,
f) Conspiracy,
g) Obstruction of Justice,
h) Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant,
i) Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant,
j) Mail Fraud,
5. Related Records:
Please accept as integral part of instant complaint additional records, linked below. In particular, the Appendix
to Motion to Intervene filed with the US Supreme Court in Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) includes many of the
records, which are the pertinent evidence in the matters described below.
a) April 20, 2010 Motion to Intervene and related papers in Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) at the US Supreme
Court
Page 3/7 July 8, 2010
i) 10-04-20 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) Face pages of five filings by Dr Joseph Zernik with stamps
showing receipt by the US Supreme Court s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30304657/
ii) 10-04-20 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 1 Amended Motion to Intervene s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161573/10-04-18-Fine-v-Sheriff-09-A827-1-Amended-Motion-to-
Intervene-s
iii) 10-04-20 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 2 Amended Request for Lenience by Pro Se Filer
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161636/
iv) 10-04-20 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 3 Amended Request for Corrections in US Supreme Court
Records
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162109/
v) 10-04-20 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 4 Amended Request for Incorporation by Reference
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162144/
vi) 10-04-20 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 5 Amended Appendices
http://www.scribd.com/doc/34050423/
b) 10-07-04 Human Rights Alert Complaint against the California Judicial Council Chaired by California
Chief Justice Ronald George and Attorney Kevin McCormick for Public Corruption and Deprivation of
Rights.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33879469/
c) 10-06-28 Human Rights Alert Complaint filed with US Attorney Office Los Angeles Re Large Scale False
Imprisonments in Los Angeles County
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33647477/
d) 10-06-21 Dr Zernik s Complaint Filed with Us Attorney Office Los Angeles against Mr David Pasternak
for Public Corruption Deprivation of Civil Rights
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33354641/
6. General
a) California Code of Civil Procedure requires that the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles,
maintain Judgment Books, regardless of the media such books are maintained in: paper, microfilm, digital
media, tapes, etc.
b) California Code of Civil Procedures further states that judgment that was not entered in a Judgment Book
was “not effectual for any purpose”.
c) Letter by Court Counsel Frederic Bennett claimed, albeit – with no authority at all - that since 1974 the
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angles did not maintain paper Judgment Books, and instead
maintained a microfilm Judgment Book.
d) The California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles continues to this day to publish Local Rules of
Court stating the Judgment Books are maintained at the Public Departments of the Office of the Clerk in
each District of the Court.
e) Deputy Clerks and Supervisors of the Office of the Clerk repeatedly claimed that NO Judgment Books
were maintained in the Public Departments of the Office of the Clerk.
f) Presiding Judge Charles McCoy and Clerk of the Court John A Clarke refused to disclose the true and
valid Local Rules of Court pertaining to Books of Judgments and entry of judgments at the Court, and
continue to publish false and deliberately misleading Local Rules of Court, stating that Books of
Judgments are maintained at the Public Departments of the Office of the Clerk of each District of the
Court.
g) The Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles maintains Registers of Actions (California civil
dockets) pursuant to California Government Code as part of its case management system – Sustain.
h) Letters by Court Counsel Frederic Bennett made various false and deliberately misleading, self-
contradictory claims in this matter. For example, in one letter the Counsel falsely claimed that the Court
published the Registers of Actions online. In another letter, the counsel falsely claimed that “at the
moment” the California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles, did NOT maintain Registers of Actions
at all.
Page 4/7 July 8, 2010
i) Clerk of the Court John A Clarke continues to this date to deny access to the Register of Actions in
Marina v LA County (BS109420), the case where Richard Fine was purportedly arrested and imprisoned,
in violation of First Amendment rights.
j) Presiding Judge Charles McCoy refused to initiate corrective actions relative to the denial of access to
court records by the Clerk of the Court.
o) It is further alleged that such records were produced and filed by Attorney McCormick in collusion
with Sheriff Lee Baca.
p) In January 2010, Sheriff Lee Baca responded on inquiry for the arrest and booking records of
Richard Fine by Supervisor Antonovich. In his response Sheriff Lee Baca produced false and
deliberately misleading records, falsely stating that Richard Fine was arrested and booked on
location and by authority of the “San Pedro Municipal Court.”
q) In 2009-2010, complainant Dr Zernik repeatedly noticed the accused: Judge David Yaffe, Presiding Judge
Charles McCoy, Clerk John Clarke, and Sheriff Lee Baca of the false records, which they had issued and
had repeatedly produced, and asked that they initiate corrective actions.
r) There is no evidence that any of the accused ever initiated any corrective actions at all. Richard Fine
remains imprisoned to this date.
Therefore, a reasonable person, upon review of the facts as a whole would conclude that Richard Fine was
and is falsely imprisoned through conspiracy of the named accused for public corruption and deprivation of
rights under the color of law.
9. Court Opinions and Judgments Regarding the arrest and imprisonment of Richard Fine.
The arrest and imprisonment of Richard Fine were never subject of any valid court order or judgment:
a) In Marina v LA County (BS109420) – Ancillary proceedings on contempt under Petition for Injunction at
the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles - as detailed in instant complaint no warrant, no
judgment, no conviction and no sentencing were ever entered in the case for the arrest or imprisonment of
Richard Fine.
b) In Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01913) – Habeas corpus petition at the US District Court, Central District of
California – as detailed in the Motion to Intervene, linked above, no order or judgment was ever entered in
the case in compliance with General Order 08-02 of the US District Court, Central District of California.
c) In Fine v Sheriff (09-071692) – Petition at the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit – as detailed in the Motion
to Intervene, no valid order was ever entered by the Court in this matter.
d) In Fine v Sheriff (09-056073) – Appeal at the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit – as detailed in the Motion
to Intervene, no valid order or mandate was ever entered by the Court in this matter.
e) In Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) – Application filed with Associate Justice Kennedy at the US Supreme Court
– as detailed in the Motion to Intervene – no denial was ever entered by Associate Justice Kennedy on the
Application.
f) In Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) – Application filed with Associate Justice Ruth Ginsburg at the US Supreme
Court – the US Supreme Court refused to review the Application.
10. Conduct of the accused in Marina v LA County (BS109420) relative to the Imprisonment of Richard
Fine is Not Unique at all
It is alleged that the fraud based on refusal to publish honest Local Rules of Court pertaining to the entry of
judgment, and the concomitant denial of access to the Registers of Actions (California civil dockets), is the
foundation for numerous cases of fraud on the people by the accused and the Superior Court of California,
County of Los Angeles, as detailed in Related Records, linked above.
Page 6/7 July 8, 2010
Instant complaint also documented the routine practice at the Superior Court of California, County of Los
Angeles, of conducting proceedings, which the Court itself never deems “on the record”, a fact that the public
cannot decipher due to denial of access to the Registers of Actions of the Court.
Instant complaint likewise documented the routine practice at the Superior Court of California, County of Los
Angeles, of issuing judgments – which the Court itself never deems as entered, valid, and effectual for any
purpose. Regardless, as documented in instant complaint, the Court affects the enforcement of such invalid,
ineffectual judgments out of compliance with the law. Such conduct is alleged as the essence of widespread
corruption at the Court.
As part of the UPR process, US, UK, Germany, and France based blogs were created,ii where almost 17,000
readers from some 85 nations were recorded so far. A Scribd site was created for Human Rights Alert in
January 2010, which has recorded over 70,000 reads, with over 500 reads a day in recent months.iii
Additional news sites, where press releases are routinely issued by Dr Zernik and Human Rights Alert, have
recorded thousands of additional readers. iv Furthermore, an archive was established online, v documenting
the alleged racketeering by Bank of America Corporation and others. The archive, not a user’s friendly site by
any stretch of imagination, has attracted thousands of visits per month from nations worldwide, totaling of
close to 90,000 visits in 2010 alone. vi
Manuscript was filed for peer review by high level international conferences in computer science, detailing
the alleged fraud in records of the Sheriff of Los Angeles County, as documented in instant complaint, and the
resulting alleged large-scale false imprisonments in Los Angeles County, California. vii
Respectfully,
Dated: July 8, 2010
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Page 7/7 July 8, 2010
By: ______________
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750
Phone: 323.515.4583
Fax: 323.488.9697
Email <jz12345@earthlink.net>
CC:
1) UPR Office of the United Nations:
UPRsubmissions@ohchr.org
2) UPR Office of the US State Department:
upr_info@state.gov
4) The Honorable Dianne Feinstein, Senator from California
5) United States Congress – Judiciary Committees
i
Human Rights Alert (NGO) report to the UN for the 2010 UPR:
a) Press Release:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30200004/
b) Submission:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/
c) Appendix:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30163613/
ii
Blog associated with Human Rights Alert (NGO)
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://josephzernik.blog.co.uk/
http://menchenrechte-los-angeles.blogspot.com/
iii
Scribd site of Human Rights Alert (NGO)
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
iv
News sites where Human Rights Alert posts routine releases:
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner
http://pressroom.prlog.org/Human_Rights_Alert/
v
Online archive documenting corruption by Bank of America and other financial institutions:
http://inproperinla.com/
vi
Intense interest by the Russian Republic in corruption of US courts and banking regulation:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33910548/
vii
Manuscript filed for peer review reviewing the alleged fraud in records of the Sheriff of Los Angeles
County and large-scale false imprisonments in Los Angeles County, California.
10-06-23 zernik Paper1 Data Mining as a Civic Duty Online Prisoner s Registration Systems s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33520723/