1) The experiment observed elastic collisions between steel and aluminum balls using a pendulum device and video analysis to track ball trajectories.
2) Analysis of on-center and off-center collisions using the pendulum showed momentum was transferred consistent with conservation of momentum.
3) Video analysis of collisions between balls of equal mass found momentum was conserved but kinetic energy decreased, indicating an inelastic collision.
1) The experiment observed elastic collisions between steel and aluminum balls using a pendulum device and video analysis to track ball trajectories.
2) Analysis of on-center and off-center collisions using the pendulum showed momentum was transferred consistent with conservation of momentum.
3) Video analysis of collisions between balls of equal mass found momentum was conserved but kinetic energy decreased, indicating an inelastic collision.
1) The experiment observed elastic collisions between steel and aluminum balls using a pendulum device and video analysis to track ball trajectories.
2) Analysis of on-center and off-center collisions using the pendulum showed momentum was transferred consistent with conservation of momentum.
3) Video analysis of collisions between balls of equal mass found momentum was conserved but kinetic energy decreased, indicating an inelastic collision.
1) The experiment observed elastic collisions between steel and aluminum balls using a pendulum device and video analysis to track ball trajectories.
2) Analysis of on-center and off-center collisions using the pendulum showed momentum was transferred consistent with conservation of momentum.
3) Video analysis of collisions between balls of equal mass found momentum was conserved but kinetic energy decreased, indicating an inelastic collision.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1
Jonathan Shao PHYS 165 L
Partner: Kevin Hwang Friday Section
10/02/2015 TA: Han Aung Summary and Afterthoughts: The experiment was primarily used to introduce the behavior of momentum and kinetic energy in elastic collisions. In Collisions, we used a balls of steel and aluminum to observe collisions qualitatively as well as two videos of previously filmed collisions to gather quantitative data by using LoggerPro. The first part consisted of investigating elastic collisions in one dimension in which a moving object struck a stationary target. Using a pendulum-like contraption, two metal balls of equal or different masses were hung with equal length strings and one was launched at the other. We observed both off-center collisions where the projectile ball hits the target ball to the right of the center and on-center collisions where the projectile ball hits the very center of the target ball. In the on-center collisions, the movement was restricted to only the x-axis. Momentum from the projectile ball was transferred to the target ball while the projectile ball remained stationary post- collision. In the off-center collisions, some of the momentum of the collision for both masses was diverted to the y-axis movement. Due to the law of conservation of momentum, the y-axis movement cancelled out as each directional component is conserved. Next we observed a video in which a metal ball collided into another metal of equal mass and tracked the trajectory of the balls using LoggerPro. After graphing both the X-axis and Y- axis ball movement separately, we were able to use the velocities and the mass of the balls to calculate momentum and conclude that the momentum in each direction was conserved as the initial and final momentums overlap within the uncertainty ranges. However, when kinetic energy was calculated, there was a significant drop indicating that the collision was inelastic. In two other cases, we examined if having a projectile with higher or lower mass than the target would affect momentum and kinetic energy. Watching another provided video comprising of those two cases, we tracked the trajectory of the balls using LoggerPro and graphed the X and Y components separately. From the graphs, we again used the mass and velocity to determine final and initial momentum to find that it was conserved. However, in the x-direction of the m1>m2 case, the calculation of momentum indicated that it was not conserved, possibly due to problems with hand-eye coordination while clicking or the selection of frames that were unrepresentative of the balls true trajectory. Like the previous case, final kinetic energy also decreased compared to initial, demonstrating the fact that energy can be converted to another form of energy such as potential energy or heat but the sum of all energy including kinetic energy is the same before and after the collision. This experiment was very insightful as it showed how a fundamental law of physics such as the law of conservation of momentum may not always be reflected exactly in an empirical setting, where there may be many discrepancies. Also, we saw how the selection of frames in the trajectory of an object is crucial in constructing a representative graph and generating values to quantitatively describe the objects movement. On a theoretical level, both momentum and energy should have been conserved in an expected elastic collision; however, although the collision and the resulting ball movement appeared to be elastic, calculations of velocity indicated that even momentum was not conserved. More strikingly, the post-collision kinetic energy was distinctly diminished compared to the pre-collision kinetic energy; on an experimental level, this makes sense, because we are reminded that energy of the system is assuredly lost to the environment in the form of sound and heat from friction.