Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 41 views

    11 2f30 Science Assessed Thinking 2fdiscussion Rubric - Blake Jewell - Topic 1

    Uploaded by

    api-349031717
    The student understands the topic but does not clearly identify the central problem or claim. Evidence is gathered from reliable sources to support the topic, but it is limited. Inferences are made using data to connect to the topic, but the logic is not well defended. A solution is proposed but is not fully evaluated against other options or supported by evidence.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    11 2f30 Science Assessed Thinking 2fdiscussion Rubric - Blake Jewell - Topic 1

    Uploaded by

    api-349031717
    41 views1 page
    The student understands the topic but does not clearly identify the central problem or claim. Evidence is gathered from reliable sources to support the topic, but it is limited. Inferences are made using data to connect to the topic, but the logic is not well defended. A solution is proposed but is not fully evaluated against other options or supported by evidence.

    Original Title

    11 2f30 science assessed thinking 2fdiscussion rubric - blake jewell - topic 1

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The student understands the topic but does not clearly identify the central problem or claim. Evidence is gathered from reliable sources to support the topic, but it is limited. Inferences are made using data to connect to the topic, but the logic is not well defended. A solution is proposed but is not fully evaluated against other options or supported by evidence.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    41 views1 page

    11 2f30 Science Assessed Thinking 2fdiscussion Rubric - Blake Jewell - Topic 1

    Uploaded by

    api-349031717
    The student understands the topic but does not clearly identify the central problem or claim. Evidence is gathered from reliable sources to support the topic, but it is limited. Inferences are made using data to connect to the topic, but the logic is not well defended. A solution is proposed but is not fully evaluated against other options or supported by evidence.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    4 3 2 1

    Demonstrates understanding of the Understands the topic and clearly Understands topic, however, Does not understand topic or
    Identification of the importance of the topic through a clearly identifies the problem or claim. problem is not clearly identified. identify problem.
    problem/claim stated claim with connections to the
    evidence.
    I think that the increase of abundant resources,
    My evidence causes the population of many species to more
    likely change. This is because...

    Gathers relevant data from reliable Gathers relevant data from reliable Has obtained data that is Data does not aid in proving
    Evidence/Data
    sources that both supports and counters sources that supports the relevant, but is limited in quality claim.
    collection/citations
    the claim/problem. claim/problem. and quantity.
    If this change was implemented with humans, then
    things like medicine, food, and buildings. Third-world
    countires will have more to eat, and the population of
    humans will go up. This is becuase with the amount of
    My evidence
    food that there is, the tird-wrld countries will be saved
    from starvatioin. Also, natural ingredients essential for
    medicine, can create more bootles/industries for that
    medicine, healing more people, preventing death longer.
    Inferences are based on mulitple pieces of Inferences are created using at least Data is interpretated but does not May have talking points, perhaps
    Interpret data/infer
    data/sources (when applicable) to connect one piece of data/source and directly connect ot the big idea. faulty logic, or lack of inference
    from
    with the big idea. Interpretation includes connects to the big idea. Logic is not defended with present.
    data/explanation of
    various ideas without the use of faulty Interpretation includes various ideas relevant data.
    evidence logic. without the use of faulty logic.
    Using our experient from yesterday as a piece
    of evidence, if birds with a certaiin beak type,
    such as the toothpick, there will be a different
    variety of food that is able to function with the
    My evidence
    type of beak. With this trait, the bird will be
    able to survive, and if this bird is a type of
    prey, the predator will be able to survive, and
    won't go extinct.
    Evaluation of the possible solutions Evaluates and recognizes other Solution/conclusion is made in Solution/conclusion is made in
    followed by the implementation of the possible solutions prior to isolation of group discussion. isolation of group discussion and
    Evaluation and
    solution moves the idea forward. Others formulating their own original is not relevant.
    implementation of a
    can use this position and expand the conclusion based on evidence.
    well-reasoned original
    boundaries of the discussion. Is able to
    solution/conclusion. synthesize a well reasoned original
    solution/conclusion.
    With this in mind I think that anything that
    changes in the enviroment will have cause and
    effect and nothing will stay the sameif you mix
    My evidence up natures way.

    You might also like