Block 1 MES 043 Unit 2
Block 1 MES 043 Unit 2
Block 1 MES 043 Unit 2
BUILDING
structure
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Objectives
2.3 Group Dynamics
2.3.1 concept of a Group
2..1
- INTRODUCTION
Mrs. Anand, joined a reputed school, as a senior home science teacher. The
environment ofthe school was new for her as she came frorn a diflerent state
and culture. But in a few days only, she became the most popular teacher
anlong all the teachers and was wanted by all the groups existing in the staf
room.
Smirha, joined n school ajler completing her R.Ed. She was considered a very
good teacher by her students as she has mastery over her subject. Principal
wa,y very pleasc)d with her but she herself was not happy. Why? She had no
frit nds in the school and no one in the staff room was ready to mingle with her.
She sat alone and took her lunch alone.
These are the cases which we encounter daily in our life, whether as a student,
teacher, Principal or working in any other capacity who are left alone to themselves.
Wh,ydoes this happen?
This unit %illfocus on the causes for such group behaviour. Here, we will discuss
about interpersonal relations and group dynamics. Further, a detailed account of
groups, how and why they are formed are described. How groups are different
from the team and how group dynamics could be used in team building are also
disci~ssed.
-
- OBJECTIVES
2.2
Mer going through this unit you will be able to-
understand the concept of group dynamics
describe the factors that contribute to positive group dynamics
define work groups and their types
describe and differentiate various theories of group formation
explain cohesive groups and their characteristics
describe the development of grouplteam
describe team building, its process, types, factors and problems.
Orga~~isational
Behaviour:
An Overview
2.3 GROUP DYNAMICS
The social process by which people interact face-to-fact in small groups is called
Group Dynamics. It is the study of the forces operating within a group. The word
"dynamics" comes from the Greek word meaning "force", and therefore the tenn
group dynamics refers to the study of forces operating within a group in a social
situation. It refers to changes which take place within groups and is concerned with
the interaction and inter-relationships among group members in a social setting. In
an organisation. an individual does not behave or act alone. They behave as the
member of some group. It is, therefore, become essential to understand the forces,
operating in a group.
Two important historical landmarks of small groups are the researches of Elton
Mayo and his associates in the 1920s and 1930s and the experiments in the 1930s
of Kurt Lewin, the founder of the group dynamics movement. Mayo showed that
workers tend to establish informal groups that affect job satisfactionand effectiveness.
Lewin showed that different kinds of leadership produced different responses in
groups.
Groups have characteristics of their own that are different from those individuals
who make up the group. This is similar to the physical situation in which a ~nolecule
of salt (sodium chloride) is different from the sodium and chlorine elements that form
a "group" to make it.
1
o Cultural factors
o Power factor
o Status and Recognition factors
i
4 1 Psychological factors
Man is a social animal and needs to feel belonged to other members of the society.
ri group provides a forum for regular interactions exchanging views and news,
expressingtheir ideas and feelings and discussing the things of their common interest.
This satisfies their sense of belonging and affiliation. They feel comfortable in the
$SOUP.
1. What is a group?
...................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................
3. What are the reasons of group formation?
There are many reasons for the formation of groups but they exist in all the
organisations. In one organisation, many types of groups exist. Each group plays a
crucial role in achieving organisadonaleffectiveness.There are many ways in which
we can classify groups.
o Formal and Informal groups Group Dynamicsand
Team Building
D Small and Large groups
D Primary and Secondary groups
Let us discuss each type in greater detail:
Group size is an important determinant of the way group members behave. The size t 1
of a group is normally measured by the nr mber of fill1time members who are involved I
in achieving the group's goals. On the basis of number of merr5ers, a group can be
a small or large group.
Small Groups
In a small group, members are likely to know everybody and interact regularly.
They can share infonnation daily and can recognize individual's contribution to the
group. For example: Teachers in a school.
Large Groups
When the number of members of in a group are very large, they are less likely to
know each other. There is lower level of interaction among members of this group.
For example: Teachers of a city. We can also take an example of IGNOU , that the
school teachers are taking B.Ed program in an academic year all over the India. But
they are all not known to every one.
26
ream H uilding
Primary Groups
A prirllary group is defined as an entity in which members have intimate face-to-face
I
interaction, interdependence and a sense of identification with the entity. A primary
group is generally small in size. Though all prirmary gmups are small in size. all groups
may not be primary, In a primary group, members have an additional feature of
same values, interests etc. and members are loyal to the grmp. For example, family
IS the best ex2mple of primary group.
Secondary Group
,i secondary group is a large entity and is made of several related primaly groups.
I t tends to be impersonal. A school organisation is an example of a secondary group
as it has various primary groups - groups of teachers, librarians, staff, workers,
:~dministratos,managing committees etc.
In 1961, Newc<~mb stated balance theory of group formation. This theory explains
gr~jupformation on the basis of attraction of people towards each other as they
have similar altitudes and values towards common objects or goals. Once a
relationship is formed, members of a group strive to maintain a balance between the
b
The first stage of team development is a period of testing and orientation in which
members learn about each other and evaluate the benefits and costs of membership.
People tend to be polite during this stage and will defer to the existing authority of a
formal or informal leader who must provide an initial set of rules and structures for
interaction. The forming stage is completed once individuals within the group feel
During the storming stage of team development, individual members become more
proactive by talung on specific roles and taskresponsibilities. This stage is marked
. by interpersonal conflict as members compete for leadership and other roles in the
team. At this stage, group members try to resist for being controlled by the group
very often, the members disagree about who should lead the group. They also differ
on how much power should the leader of their group have. This stage is completed
when group members no longer resist the group's control and there is mutual
understandingand agreement about who will lead the group. Normally this stage is
comvleted when grouv members consider that it is better to work together for the
During the norming stage, the team develops its frst real sense of cohesion as roles
are established and a consensus forms around group objectives. Members have
developed relatively similar mental models, so they have common expectations and
assumptions about how the team goals should be accomplished. Thir common
knowledge structure allows them to interact more efficiently, so they can move into
I At this stage, team becomes more task-oriented as it shifts its focus fromestablishing 1
Team building is any formal activity intended to improve the development and
functioning of a work team. It is intended to shape the team for smooth functioning.
Steven and Mary Ann Von have defined team building as any formal intervention
directed towards improving the development and functioning of a work team. Thus,
the process of team building aims at enhancing the effectiveness of a team. Team
building encourages team members to examine how they work together, identify
their weaknesses and develop more effective ways of cooperating. The goal is to
make the team more effective.
I Identification of a problem
1
v
Collection of relevant data
v
Data feedback and confrofitation
v
Problem solving experience
9
On-the-job application & follow up
cooperate. Beyond these requirement, members can work together as a team only Group Dynamics and
Team Building
after all the members of the group know the roles of all the others with whom they
will be interacting.When this understanding exist$team members respond voluntarily
to demands of the job and take appropriate actions to accomplish team goals.
I
Teams take time to develop and maintain, which requires time and energy
resources to dvelop and maintain team than the task.
Organisations don't provide suitable environmentfor the teams to flourish.
Social Loafing: This is the tendency for individualsto perform at a lower level
, when working in groups than when alone.
Check Your Progress
Note: (a) Space is given below each question to write your answers.
. (b) Compare your answer with those given at the end of the unit
'
8. Mention the stages of team building
2.18 REFERENCES
Hersey, Paul. & Blachard, H. Kenneth : Management of Organisationa/
Behaviozlr : Utilizing Human Resornrces. 61hEdition. Prentice Hall of India.
1996.
Balvelas, A., and G. Strauss."Group Dynamics and Itztergrozlp Relations", in
K. Renne and R Chin , Eds. The Planning of Change. New York: Holt, Rinehart
&WinSton, 1 962
Walton, M. The Dernilzg Management Method. New York : Praeger.
Bion, W. R. ; Exprrienre irz Grotlp:And other Paper. Tavistock. Reprinted
1989 Routledge
Dyer, Willam The Different Drum: Community -making and Peace. New York :
Simon and Schuster ISBN 0684848589
Forsyth, D.R. Group Dynamics, 4thEdition, Belmont, CA : Thomson wadsworth.
ISBN 0534-36822-0,2006.
Freud. Sigmund, Group Psychology arzd tlze Analysis of tlze Ego, New York :
Livenight Publishing, 1992.
t