Meeting The Energy Challenge Author - John P. Holdren - Feb. 09, 2001-3

2/16/2017 Meeting the Energy Challenge | Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
ANALYSIS&OPINIONS- Science
MeetingtheEnergyChallenge
Author:JohnP.Holdren | Feb.09,2001
MEETING THE ENERGY CHALLENGE
by John Holdren
A ordable energy in ample quantities is the lifeblood of the industrial societies and a prerequisite for the
economic development of the others. Not surprisingly, access to and the cost of energy have long been
political issues within and among nations. Wars have been fought at least in part over access to prime
energy resources and may be again. Energy may also be the most intractable element of the world's
environmental problems. This is because energy's e uents drive many of the most dangerous
environmental problems at every scale (from the health impacts of woodsmoke in Third World village huts
to the disruption of global climate by anthropogenic greenhouse gases) and because the energy system
characteristics at fault are often costly and time-consuming to change.
Despite energy's pervasive importance to the human condition, it attracts the widespread attention of
publics and their political leaders mainly in times of short-run supply-price "crises," the latest being the
electricity asco in California. Minimizing society's vulnerability to supply-price crises in the short term
will require addressing several interlinked problems. The current partly free-market, partly regulated
characteristics of energy supply systems need adjustment to better dampen the propensity of commodity
markets for extreme price uctuations. This should include more scope and better ways for retail
consumers to perceive and respond to the high wholesale costs of electricity at times of peak demand. Ways
must also be found to encourage larger investments in reliability, which is partly a matter of transmission
infrastructure and partly a matter of diversity in sources of supply. The United States has repeatedly
stumbled by putting too many energy eggs in the cheapest basket of the moment. Oil imported from the
Middle East in the 1960s and early 1970s and domestic natural gas for combined-cycle electricity
generation in the 1980s and 1990s are only two examples.
Neither complete reregulation nor complete deregulation of energy markets is the answer. Capturing the
cost savings available from the appropriate play of market forces in the energy sector is too appealing a
proposition to abandon. But energy is too burdened with public-goods dimensions (including national
security, environmental sustainability, the macroeconomic rami cations of reliability, and society's
commitment to meet the basic needs of its poorest members) to allow complete deregulation. The
directions for addressing our short-term energy challenges are easier to describe than designing and
implementing the details will be. But more daunting still are the energy challenges looming in the longer
term. These include providing a sustainable energy basis for maintaining prosperity where it already exists
http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/meeting-energy-challenge 1/3
and achieving it where it does not, limiting dependence on imported oil, reducing the risks from
greenhouse gas-induced climate change, and minimizing the contributions of nuclear energy to nuclear
weapons dangers.
Meeting these challenges will require increased e orts to maximize the capabilities and minimize the
liabilities of the full array of energy options: improvements in end-use energy e ciency in vehicles,
residences, and industries; renewable energy sources; advanced fossil fuel and nuclear ssion technologies;
and nuclear fusion. There is no silver bullet in this array nor are there any that we can be con dent we can
do without. Current levels of public and private investment in energy R&D and demonstration are not
remotely commensurate with the long-term challenges and opportunities, either in the United States or in
any other country. U.S. federal expenditures on applied energy technology R&D are about what they were,
in real terms, just before the oil price shock of 1973-74, although today's economy is more than twice as
large. U.S. private sector investments in energy R&D have been falling since the mid-1980s.
Strengthening R&D is only part of the answer. Incentives must also be strengthened for deploying a wider
array of the most attractive options from the menu available at any given time. And increased international
cooperation in energy innovation is warranted, because U.S. and other countries' economic, environmental,
and security interests are served thereby. Although markets have a large role to play in all this, the
government must also be involved. The large public bene ts attending the right choices and the large
public costs attending the wrong ones require it.
Formoreinformationonthispublication:PleasecontactScience,Technology,andPublicPolicy
ForAcademicCitation:Holdren,JohnP..MeetingtheEnergyChallenge.Science,February9,2001.

Meeting The Energy Challenge Author - John P. Holdren - Feb. 09, 2001-3

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Meeting The Energy Challenge Author - John P. Holdren - Feb. 09, 2001-3

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Meeting The Energy Challenge Author - John P. Holdren - Feb. 09, 2001-3

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

2/16/2017 Meeting the Energy Challenge | Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs

MEETING THE ENERGY CHALLENGE

You might also like