The document provides a list of 14 potential essay topics ranging from issues in the Indian educational system to the Indian space program. Some example topics include whether India's youth should imbibe aspects of western culture, if industrialization should come at the cost of human rights, and if pubs are anti-Indian. The document also includes a passage discussing how having too many stakeholders or "cooks" in a situation can result in compromise becoming difficult and an undesirable outcome. It notes this principle can apply to governance and decision making in large organizations and democracies.
The document provides a list of 14 potential essay topics ranging from issues in the Indian educational system to the Indian space program. Some example topics include whether India's youth should imbibe aspects of western culture, if industrialization should come at the cost of human rights, and if pubs are anti-Indian. The document also includes a passage discussing how having too many stakeholders or "cooks" in a situation can result in compromise becoming difficult and an undesirable outcome. It notes this principle can apply to governance and decision making in large organizations and democracies.
The document provides a list of 14 potential essay topics ranging from issues in the Indian educational system to the Indian space program. Some example topics include whether India's youth should imbibe aspects of western culture, if industrialization should come at the cost of human rights, and if pubs are anti-Indian. The document also includes a passage discussing how having too many stakeholders or "cooks" in a situation can result in compromise becoming difficult and an undesirable outcome. It notes this principle can apply to governance and decision making in large organizations and democracies.
The document provides a list of 14 potential essay topics ranging from issues in the Indian educational system to the Indian space program. Some example topics include whether India's youth should imbibe aspects of western culture, if industrialization should come at the cost of human rights, and if pubs are anti-Indian. The document also includes a passage discussing how having too many stakeholders or "cooks" in a situation can result in compromise becoming difficult and an undesirable outcome. It notes this principle can apply to governance and decision making in large organizations and democracies.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
Essay Topics
The educational system is killing creativity in Indian children.
Should Nehrus temples of learning remain elitist? Indian women should take up their husbands surname after marriage. Should Indias youth imbibe the positive aspects of western culture? Both men and women need to undergo gender sensitivity courses. NGOs are yet to get their due from society. Studying pure science is a waste of time. Industrialisation should not happen at the cost of human rights. Indian politicians need training in communication skills. Globalisation has failed to live up to its promises. Pubs are anti-Indian. It should be made compulsory for Indian politicians to be fit. The resurgence of public sector companies in the current financial slowdown. Obama will bring change, but only to the USA. The Indian space programme is an ambition misplaced
Too many cooks spoil the broth
Metaphorically, the quote suggests that for each situation or broth we may have a number of stakeholders or cooks that will have their own agenda. Compromise in such a situation becomes difficult and ultimately results in a hotchpotch. We pride ourselves as being the largest democracy in the world. Our founding fathers believed in the principle of Unity in Diversity. Our system of governance is based on inclusion of diverse groups in the decision making process and take in account their perspectives and experiences. This move, though highly laudable, systemically slows the decision making process and thus governance. Important reforms and legislation thus never see the light of the day. Another pertinent example of this would be the UN General Assembly. The 170 member strong general assembly typically convenes once a year to discuss strategic policy measures in food security, human rights, literacy etc. But it has successfully managed to delegitimise its authority and become a facade because of the infighting among its member nations. The major decisions are thus taken in effect by the elite few i.e. the UNSC. So should we then restrict decision making to a select few in power? No, because decentralized and flat hierarchical business and govt. models are not only more efficient but also more stable. We can only reach compromise and decision when we are willing to work with those on the other side of the table with reason and resolve. Major corporate houses and organisations can avoid infighting and conflicts by continuous introspection whether they are on the foundations on which their organisation was built.