Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 199 views

    Commercial Rubric

    Uploaded by

    ixgarcia
    The document provides a rubric for scoring presentations on various metrics including purpose, organization, voice/tone, details/elaboration, and presentation. A score of 5 is the highest and represents a very clear purpose, strong organization, precise language, insightful arguments with evidence, and smooth delivery. A score of 1 is the lowest and lacks focus, organization, appropriate language, supporting details, and smooth delivery.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Commercial Rubric

    Uploaded by

    ixgarcia
    199 views2 pages
    The document provides a rubric for scoring presentations on various metrics including purpose, organization, voice/tone, details/elaboration, and presentation. A score of 5 is the highest and represents a very clear purpose, strong organization, precise language, insightful arguments with evidence, and smooth delivery. A score of 1 is the lowest and lacks focus, organization, appropriate language, supporting details, and smooth delivery.

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document provides a rubric for scoring presentations on various metrics including purpose, organization, voice/tone, details/elaboration, and presentation. A score of 5 is the highest and represents a very clear purpose, strong organization, precise language, insightful arguments with evidence, and smooth delivery. A score of 1 is the lowest and lacks focus, organization, appropriate language, supporting details, and smooth delivery.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    199 views2 pages

    Commercial Rubric

    Uploaded by

    ixgarcia
    The document provides a rubric for scoring presentations on various metrics including purpose, organization, voice/tone, details/elaboration, and presentation. A score of 5 is the highest and represents a very clear purpose, strong organization, precise language, insightful arguments with evidence, and smooth delivery. A score of 1 is the lowest and lacks focus, organization, appropriate language, supporting details, and smooth delivery.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Commercial Score Point 5 Score Point 4 Score Point 3 Score Point 2

    Score Point 1
    Rubric

    Purpose -Has a clear and -Has a clear and -Has a clear -Topic may be -No position
    focused position focused position position unclear. statement or
    statement, which is statement, statement. -Weak position focus.
    maintained throughout which is -Attempts to statement/focus is -No context.
    the piece. maintained maintain focus unclear. -May be rambling,
    -Appropriate to throughout the throughout. -May meander or long, or
    audience. piece. -Establishes contain unfocused.
    -Establishes -Appropriate to context. digressions.
    background info. audience. -May have -Does not
    (Context) for the -Establishes some -Give some mention
    presentation of ideas.background digressions. advantages of advantages or
    info. (Context) energy source. disadvantages of
    -Addresses advantages for the -Gives many energy source.
    and disadvantages of presentation of advantages of
    energy source. ideas. energy source.

    -Gives
    advantages and
    one
    disadvantage of
    energy source.

    Organization -May present ideas in -Has a strong -May lack -Introduction -Shows little
    unusual or surprising opening, effective and/or conclusion logical
    patterns/format. convincing beginning or are weak. arrangement of
    -Interesting ideas, body, and a ending. -May possess ideas.
    expressed in an strong -Arranges ideas simple, -Too brief.
    original way. conclusion. in simple ways, straightforward -No transitions.
    -Arranges listing without organization.
    arguments, relating them -Lacks transitions.
    reasons, and/or to each other. -Weak coherence.
    evidence -Weak
    effectively and transitions.
    persuasively.
    -Uses effective
    transitions in a
    logical
    sequence.
    -Possesses
    overall
    coherence and
    unity.

    Voice/Tone -Language is selected -Language must -Uses -Language is -Language may


    with careful attention be persuasive appropriate predictable and be inappropriate
    to persuasive appeal. as well as language, but general rather or inexact.
    -Writer shows convey may lack than precise.
    confidence, conviction, conviction and precision. -Lacks conviction.
    and enthusiasm. confidence. -Usually -Little sentence
    -Uses precise conveys a variety.
    language sense of
    effectively and conviction.
    purposefully.
    -Is appropriate
    for the
    anticipated
    audience.
    -Sentence
    structure is
    varied.

    Details/Elaboratio -Presents unusually -Uses a range of -Some attempt -Little use of -Uses few or no
    n perceptive strategies: at using persuasive supporting ideas.
    arguments/reasons statistics, persuasive strategies. -Does not
    with richly elaborated anecdotes, etc. strategies. -Reasons are recognize the
    supporting details. -Relevant facts, -States thinly developed. counter-
    -Argue effectively for convincing appropriate -Presents some arguments or the
    position. arguments, and arguments or info, but lacks concerns of the
    -Insightful in examples are reasons. elaboration. viewer
    anticipating and used to -Provides some -May contain
    addressing possible elaborate on the supporting irrelevant or
    viewer concerns. position evidence for inappropriate
    -Embeds prior statement. arguments or details or
    knowledge, personal -Anticipates and reasons. examples.
    experience, and/or refutes counter- -Assumes the -Does not identify
    reflection into the arguments. viewer will find counter-
    fabric of argument. the ideas arguments.
    credible.
    *Meets all criteria listed -Identifies
    in score point 3. counter-
    arguments, but
    may not refute
    them.

    Presentation Smooth delivery that Fairly smooth Delivery not Delivery not
    holds audience delivery that smooth, but smooth and
    attention. holds audience able to audience attention
    attention most maintain often lost.
    of the time. interest of the
    audience most
    of the time.

    You might also like