Azizi Samir Et Al. 2004 - CNC Reinforced Poly (Oxyethylene)
Azizi Samir Et Al. 2004 - CNC Reinforced Poly (Oxyethylene)
Azizi Samir Et Al. 2004 - CNC Reinforced Poly (Oxyethylene)
www.elsevier.com/locate/polymer
Abstract
Nanocomposite materials were prepared from poly(oxyethylene) (POE) as the matrix and a stable aqueous suspension of cellulose
nanocrystals extracted from tunicate as the reinforcing phase. After dissolving POE in water and mixing with the cellulose nanocrystals
suspension, solid films were obtained by casting and evaporating the preparations. Resulting films were characterized using scanning electron
microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, thermogravimetric analysis and dynamic mechanical analysis. Favorable interactions between
cellulose and POE were evidenced and assumed to be partially responsible for a decrease of the crystallinity of the matrix. A thermal
stabilization of the nanocomposites for temperatures higher than the melting temperature of POE was reported and ascribed to the formation
of a rigid cellulosic network within the matrix assumed to be governed by a percolation effect. The formation of this percolating network was
not altered by the matrix crystallization process and filler/POE interactions.
q 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Cellulose whiskers; Poly(oxyethylene); Nanocomposite
complete melting of POE. It was then cooled down to 0 8C The fractured surface of nanocomposite films displays a
at a cooling rate of 10 8C min21. similar non-uniform aspect. By comparing the micrograph
showing the surface of fracture of unfilled POE (panel a) and
2.6. Thermogravimetric analysis of composites (panels b and c), it is easy to identify cellulose
whiskers. They appear like white dots, whose concentration
Thermogravimetric measurements were carried out with is a direct function of the cellulose content in the composite.
a Netzsch STA409 thermal analyzer. Few milligrams of the These shiny dots correspond to the transverse sections of the
sample were heated from room temperature up to 500 8C at cellulose whiskers. Their diameter, around 60 nm, is much
10 8C min21 under nitrogen flow. higher than the whiskers diameter. This results from a
charge concentration effect due to the emergence of tunicin
2.7. Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) whiskers from the observed surface. It is worth noting that
the filler is more or less evenly distributed within the
Dynamic mechanical measurements were carried out polymeric matrix but some whiskers are not fully indivi-
with a spectrometer RSA2 from rheometrics working in the dualized and form small aggregates (indicate by arrows).
tensile mode. The strain amplitude was fixed at 0.05% so as
to be in the domain of the linear viscoelasticity of the 3.2. Thermal behavior and crystallization of POE
material. The samples were thin rectangular strips with
dimensions about 20 7 0.2 mm3. Measurements were DSC measurements were performed on the POE matrix
performed in isochronal condition at 1 Hz and the and related tunicin whiskers composites. Scans were
temperature was varied between 150 and 450 K by steps performed at least two weeks after film formation and
of 2 K. storage in a glove box to ensure stabilization of the degree of
crystallinity and perfect reliability of measurements. The
2.8. Heat flow microcalorimetry values of the glass rubber transition temperature Tg ;
melting temperature Tm and corresponding heat of fusion
The calorimetric measurements (Setaram - C 80 micro- DHm are collected in Table 1. No significant influence of
calorimeter) were performed in a two-compartment cell: a the cellulose whiskers content on Tg is reported and its value
lower compartment, where 5 mg of whiskers were placed is around 2 60 8C. The melting temperature is also found to
and an upper compartment where typically 500 mg of the be roughly constant for low whiskers content, up to 10 wt%.
different solvents were introduced. A PTFE membrane However, for higher filler loading the Tm value decreases
separated the two compartments. A reference cell of the significantly. A similar effect was reported by Nishio et al.
same type was used, the upper compartment containing also [24] and Guo and Liang [25] for POE/cellulose blends. This
500 mg of the same solvent and the lower compartment decrease of Tm could be ascribed to two effects. The first one
being empty. The two cells were placed in the apparatus for is a morphological phenomenon and could be related to a
temperature equilibration until the relative heat flow was decrease of the POE crystallites size due to the formation of
below 50 mW. The PTFE membranes of the two cells were a close cellulose network within the matrix, mainly for high
then pierced simultaneously by a movable steel needle. For filler content. The POE spherulites growth could be
each measurement the temperature was fixed at 40 8C and therefore restricted. The second effect could originate
the experiment was performed twice. from the expected strong interactions between ether oxygen
groups of POE and hydroxyl groups of cellulose whiskers
[26]. Owing to the high specific area of tunicin whiskers,
3. Results and discussion
Fig. 1. Scanning electron micrographs from the fractured surfaces of (a) unfilled POE matrix and related composites filled with (b) 3 wt% and (c) 6 wt% tunicin
whiskers.
significant interactions can be established mainly at high increases. It could be ascribed to an anti nucleation effect of
loading level. the filler. Theoretically, the nucleation rate is the product of
The degree of crystallinity of tunicin whiskers/POE films mass transport and nucleation parameters [28]. The
was calculated using the heat of fusion determined from transport factor is related to chains self-diffusion. Two
DSC measurements and the one corresponding to a 100% phenomena could explain the anti nucleation effect of
crystalline POE reported by Vidotto et al. [27]. These values cellulose whiskers.
are reported in Table 1. xc corresponds to the apparent
degree of crystallinity of the films calculated from the
enthalpy of fusion per gram of composite, whereas xp was
obtained from the heat of fusion per gram of POE in the
composite. For low whiskers content, up to 10 wt%, the xp
value is quite constant, but it is found to decrease for higher
loading level. It could be ascribed to a steric phenomenon,
POE spherulites growing in the presence of a close
cellulosic network as the dispersed phase in agreement
with the decrease of Tm already observed.
Fig. 2 shows DSC thermograms of the dynamic cooling
crystallization of the unfilled POE matrix and 10 and
30 wt% tunicin whiskers based composites. Both the
crystallization temperature corresponding to the peak
temperature of the crystallization exotherm and the Fig. 2. DSC thermograms showing the non-isothermal crystallization at
temperature associated with the beginning of the crystal- 10 8C min21 for POE based composites filled with 0 (W), 10 (A) and
lization process decrease as the cellulose whiskers content 30 wt% (V) of tunicin whiskers.
M.A.S. Azizi Samir et al. / Polymer 45 (2004) 41494157 4153
(i) The first one is due to the likely strong affinity of POE
molecules with the reactive cellulose surface. This
coupling effect should result in a restricted molecular
mobility of POE chains in contact with the whiskers
surface. Owing to the very high specific area of tunicin
whiskers, this hindered mobility could be strong
enough to affect the global chain self-diffusion of the
matrix. However, no shift of Tg was reported from DSC
measurements.
(ii) The second explanation could be the expected increase
of the viscosity of the polymer melt ascribed to the
presence of whiskers. This increased viscosity may
induce an increase of the activation energy of diffusion
of the chains.
non-isothermal crystallization process begins seems to hydrophilic cellulose whiskers in presence of a highly
disagree with this hypothesis for POE based composites. hydrophobic solvent and evaluate the contribution of the
From the polarized optical microscopic observations the alkane part of POE to the global interactions. Results are
growth rate of the POE spherulites was determined. It was reported in Table 2. The heat of immersion is directly
calculated from the determination of the time evolution of related to the interaction between cellulosic whiskers and
the spherulitic radius during isothermal crystallization. the solvent and it can be used to determine contact angles
Crystallization conditions were similar to those chosen in [30]. The highest value of Dho was obtained for water due to
Fig. 4 and consist in melting the polymer at 90 8C for 5 min the strong hydrophilic character of cellulose. On the
and cooling it down to 53.6 8C. Fig. 5 shows the evolution of contrary and as expected, dodecane displays the weakest
the POE spherulites radius vs. time during isothermal interactions.
crystallization at 53.6 8C for the unfilled matrix (filled For oligoethers, intermediate values were obtained. The
symbols) and 10 wt% filled composite (open symbols). Its highest value reported for a,b-dihydroxy oligo(oxyethy-
value is systematically lower for the composite compared to lene) (PEG200) compared to polyethylene glycol dimethy-
the unfilled matrix in agreement with our previous optical lether (PEGDME500) and tetra(ethylene glycol) dimethyl
microscopic and DSC observations. A linear dependence is ether (tetraglymea low molecular weight PEGDM)
observed and the growth rate was calculated from the slope suggests a stronger affinity of the cellulose whiskers surface
of the linear fit of the curves. Its value is 0.27 mm s21 for the with hydroxyl end groups of POE than its ether oxygen
unfilled POE and 0.28 mm s21 for the composite. Therefore, groups. However, the difference in Dho observed between
surprisingly the presence of the tunicin whiskers within the the tetraglyme and the PEGDME500 indicates significant
polymeric matrix does not affect the spherulitic growth rate
interactions between ether oxygen groups and the cellulose
of POE during its crystallization. This observation could be
whiskers.
ascribed to the composition-independence of the POE POE
Kondo and Sawatari [26] have shown the influence of the
interactions during the crystallization process. Polymer
hydroxyl regiochemistry in cellulose on hydrogen bonds
chains located in the vicinity of the cellulose/POE interface
formation in cellulose/POE blends. IR spectroscopy
could most probably strongly interact with the cellulosic
measurements support that primary hydroxyl groups at the
surface and coat the cellulose whiskers with a polymeric
position C6 of the glucose unit of cellulose interact
shell of restricted mobility. On the contrary, bulk POE
predominantly with ether oxygen in POE in comparison to
chains mainly responsible for the crystallization process
display a crystallization rate similar to the one of the unfilled the cellulose hydroxyl groups in position C2 and C3.
matrix.
3.4. Thermogravimetric analysis
3.3. Cellulose/POE interactions
The possibility of cellulose whiskers/POE interactions The potential use of tunicin whiskers/POE composites as
has been suggested several times in this study and used as a a matrix in electrolyte polymer applications requires
potential hypothesis to explain some observations. They thermal stability. Unfilled POE and related composites
were quantified using heat flow microcalorimetry. The heat filled with various whiskers contents were tested using
of immersion, Dho ; was directly measured by mixing tunicin thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) (Fig. 6). Thermal
whiskers with water, dodecane and oligoethers. Dodecane degradation phenomena of POE have been reported [31]
was used for comparison to display the behavior of and a complex mechanism of POE degradation was
proposed. The weakening of C O bonds may accelerate
the thermal degradation as observed in POE/metallic cation
complexes [32,33].
Fig. 6 shows that the degradation of POE starts around
300 8C. No significant influence of the presence of cellulose
whiskers on the thermal stability was reported despite strong
cellulose/POE interactions.
Table 2
Heat of immersion Dho measured at 40 8C for tunicin whiskers with water,
dodecane, polyethylene glycol 200 (PEG200), polyethylene glycol
dimethylether 500 (PEGDME500) and tetra(ethylene glycol) dimethyl
ether (tetraglyme)
cellulose whiskers network. Details of the calculation can be calculated and the experimental data at lower filler content
found elsewhere [1,2,4 7]. When the filler modulus is far (3 and 6 wt%) is probably due to the fact that the prediction
higher than the one of the matrix, i.e. above Tm in our case, does not account for the distribution of the whiskers lengths.
the predicted composite modulus, Ec ; is simply given by Another possible cause of discrepancy could be also the
Ref. [5]: presence of aggregates observed by SEM.
Ec c E R 1
where c and ER correspond to the volume fraction and 4. Conclusions
modulus of the stiff percolating network, respectively. c can
be written as: Nanocomposite materials were prepared from an aqu-
c0 for vR , vRc eous suspension of high aspect ratio rod-like cellulosic
b particles composed of tunicin whiskers and a poly(oxyethy-
vR 2 vRc 2 lene) (POE) aqueous solution. After casting and water
c vR for vR $ vRc
1 2 vRc evaporation a solid composite film was obtained and
scanning electron microscopic observations revealed an
where vR ; vRc and b correspond to the volume fraction of
evenly dispersed cellulosic phase within the POE matrix.
filler, the critical volume fraction at the percolation
The glass rubber transition temperature of POE was not
threshold and the corresponding critical exponent, respect-
influenced by the cellulosic filler, contrarily to the melting
ively. It means that all the stiffness of the material results
temperature and degree of crystallinity which were found to
from infinite aggregates of tunicin whiskers.
decrease for highly filled (10 wt% and above) materials.
It is now of interest to compare the performances of
This restricted crystallinity was confirm by dynamic cooling
tunicin whiskers/POE nanocomposites to the data predicted
crystallization experiments and polarized optical micro-
from this model based on the percolation concept. The
scopic observations. It was ascribed to both strong
volume fraction c was calculated using the parameters
interactions between the POE chains and cellulosic surface
already used in our previous studies: vRC 1 vol% for the
and increased viscosity of the melt composite. Cellulose/
percolation threshold and b 0:4 for the critical exponent
POE interactions were quantified using heat flow micro-
in a three-dimensional problem according to the percolation
theory [1,2,4 7]. The densities of crystalline cellulose and calorimetry measurements. The mechanical behavior of
POE were taken as 1.5 and 1.2 g cm23, respectively. The tunicin whiskers/POE nanocomposites was evaluated in the
tensile modulus, ER ; of a film of cellulose whiskers was linear range over a broad temperature range from dynamic
measured from a tensile test performed on a film prepared mechanical analysis. The main effect of the filler was a
by water evaporation of a tunicin whiskers suspension thermal stabilization of the storage modulus for the
ER 8 GPa: Literature reports values ranging between 5 composites above the melting temperature of the POE
and 15 GPa depending on the source of cellulose [1,2,4]. matrix. This phenomenon was well predicted from a model
The calculated moduli are 35, 106 and 255 MPa for the based on the percolation concept. It was shown that the
composites filled with 3, 6 and 10 wt% of tunicin whiskers, formation of the cellulosic network through inter-whiskers
respectively. The order of magnitude of the predicted data hydrogen bonds, assumed to be responsible for the high
agrees with the experimental ones. It is a good indication mechanical properties of the composites, was not affected
that the cellulose whiskers percolation phenomenon is by the matrix crystallization process and filler/POE
almost not affected by the crystallization process of the interactions.
matrix and filler/POE interactions. The cellulose-cellulose
interactions seems to be higher than cellulose/POE ones.
This is also supported by the high temperature modulus Acknowledgements
values obtained for tunicin whiskers reinforced cross-linked
unsaturated polyether, which were around 25 and 70 MPa The authors thank the Region Rhone-Alpes for financial
for 3 and 6 wt% filled composites, respectively [36]. support, and Mrs D. Dupeyre and M.M. Paillet for helping
However, these experimental data could be affected by in SEM study and tunicin whiskers preparation,
the low temperature storage modulus normalization. The respectively.
good agreement between experimental and predicted data
for the highly filled material (10 wt%) could be ascribed to
the high sensibility of the calculated modulus value near the
References
percolation threshold and its stabilization for higher filler
content. However, the good prediction of this asymptotic
[1] Favier V, Canova GR, Cavaille JY, Chanzy H, Dufresne A, Gauthier
value for compositions far above the percolation threshold C. Polym Adv Tech 1995;6:3515.
proves the validity of the model based on the percolation [2] Favier V, Chanzy H, Cavaille JY. Macromolecules 1995;28(18):
concept. In addition, the discrepancy observed between the 63657.
M.A.S. Azizi Samir et al. / Polymer 45 (2004) 41494157 4157
[3] Helbert W, Cavaille JY, Dufresne A. Polym Compos 1996;17(4): [21] Revol JF, Godbout L, Dong XM, Gray DG. Liq Cryst 1994;16:
60411. 12734.
[4] Dufresne A, Helbert W, Cavaille JY. Polym Compos 1997;18(2): [22] Dong XM, Kimura T, Revol JF, Gray DG. Langmuir 1996;12(8):
198210. 2076 82.
[5] Dubief D, Samain E, Dufresne A. Macromolecules 1999;32(18): [23] Allcock HR, Napierala ME, Olmeijier DL, Cameron CG, Kuharcik
576571. SE, Reed CS, OConnor SJM. Electrochim Acta 1998;43:114550.
[6] Dufresne A, Kellerhals MB, Witholt B. Macromolecules 1999;32(22): [24] Nishio Y, Hirose N, Takahashi T. Polym J 1989;21(4):34751.
7396401. [25] Guo YQ, Liang XH. J Macromol Sci Phys 1999;B38(4):439 47.
[7] Dufresne A. Compos Interfaces 2000;7(1):53 67. [26] Kondo T, Sawatari C. Polymer 1994;35(20):44238.
[8] Angle`s MN, Dufresne A. Macromolecules 2000;33(22):8344 53. [27] Vidotto G, Levy DL, Kovacs A. J Kolloid Z.Z Polym 1969;230(2):
[9] Angle`s MN, Dufresne A. Macromolecules 2001;34(9):292131. 289305.
[10] Mathew AP, Dufresne A. Biomacromolecules 2002;3(3):609 17. [28] Van Krevelen DW, 3rd ed. Properties of polymers, Amsterdam:
[11] Dufresne A, Cavaille JY, Helbert W. Macromolecules 1996;29(23):
Elsevier Science; 1990. Chapter 19.
76246.
[29] Bonini C. Ph.D. Thesis, Grenoble I, France; 2000.
[12] Dufresne A, Cavaille JY. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 1998;
[30] Yan N, Maham Y, Masliyah JH, Gray MR, Mather AE. J Colloid
36(12):2211.
Interf Sci 2000;228:16.
[13] Paillet M, Dufresne A. Macromolecules 2001;34(19):652730.
[31] Yang L, Heatly F, Blease TG, Thompson RIG. Eur Polym J 1996;
[14] Morin A, Dufresne A. Macromolecules 2002;35(6):2190 9.
32(5):535 47.
[15] Gopalan Nair K, Dufresne A. Biomacromolecules 2003;4(3):65765.
[16] Gopalan Nair K, Dufresne A. Biomacromolecules 2003;4(3):66674. [32] Costa L, Gad AM, Camino G, Cameron GG, Qureshi MY.
[17] Gopalan Nair K, Dufresne A, Gandini A, Belgacem MN. Biomacro- Macromolecules 1992;25(20):55128.
molecules 2003;4(6):183542. [33] Gordon G, Cameron GG, Ingram MD, Qureshi MY, Gearing HM. Eur
[18] Wise LE, Murphy M, dAddiecco AA. Pap Trad J 1946;122:3543. Polym J 1989;25(7/8):77984.
[19] Terech P, Chazeau L, Cavaille JY. Macromolecules 1999;32(6): [34] Wetton RE, Allen G. Polymer 1966;7(7):33165.
18725. [35] Takayanagi M, Uemura S, Minami S. J Polym Sci C 1964;5:113 22.
[20] Marchessault RH, Morehead FF, Walter NM. Nature 1959;184: [36] Azizi Samir MAS, Alloin F, Sanchez JY, El Kissi N, Dufresne A.
6323. Macromolecules 2004;37(4):138693.