0% found this document useful (0 votes)
164 views8 pages

Spanish Utilities: Uncertainty Reigns. Downgrade Iberdrola To NEUTRAL

Uploaded by

pdoor
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
164 views8 pages

Spanish Utilities: Uncertainty Reigns. Downgrade Iberdrola To NEUTRAL

Uploaded by

pdoor
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

Europe Credit Research

01 July 2010

Spanish Utilities
Uncertainty reigns. Downgrade Iberdrola to NEUTRAL

• Last week the Spanish Socialist government announced that it had Credit Research
reached an agreement with the opposition Popular Party to hold a Olek Keenan, CFA
AC

cross-party review of all aspects of energy policy. As a result, the (44-20) 7777-0017
planned July electricity tariff increase has been cancelled because [email protected]
energy is crucial to competitiveness and the “welfare of citizens”. The Ryan Staszewski
parties have now held an initial meeting on the structure of the pact, (44-20) 7777-1981
and hope to reach agreement within a month on an energy strategy for [email protected]

the next 10-25 years which would not then be changed with each J.P. Morgan Securities Ltd.
successive change in government.

• The initial focus of the review is the cost elements of the system, but
the remit stretches across the energy mix, supply-side management,
nuclear policy, renewable targets and the development of
infrastructure. As such, we believe that all parts of the electricity value
chain are vulnerable to changes. By contrast, and despite the pact
looking at energy, there has been little focus on the gas markets or
networks. This should be reassuring for bondholders in Enagas.

• In this note we look at some of the potential changes, of which the most
potentially negative is changes to the tariff deficit. The Minister has
stated that the payment and securitization of the tariff deficit is not
under review, but we think it is the most dramatic way that politicians
could benefit consumers at the expense of utilities, so we review it in
detail. We also look at the possibilities of a tax on specific types of
generation or changes in the premium prices paid to renewable
generators, both of which are plausible, in our view. Finally, we
compare the relative exposure of various utilities to potential changes.

• Although we and others had long feared that utilities were vulnerable to
political intervention in the form of higher taxes or tougher regulation
(see A fundamental credit market view of sovereign risk, 9 Feb) this
review is far more politically high-profile and wide-ranging than we
had expected. As such, we expect spreads to remain weak until there is
more clarity and we think there is a reasonable chance of negative
changes large enough to prompt rating reviews.

• In terms of trading levels, unlike in our last discussion in What is


relative value relative to?, 25 May, Iberdrola bond yields are now
lower than Spanish government bonds. We do not believe this is
fundamentally justifiable, and think it is worth remembering that
previous utility issuance was discussed in terms of domestic
government bond yield plus a spread. As a result we downgrade to
NEUTRAL (5Y CDS 215-225, midday 1 July). We remain
UNDERWEIGHT Gas Natural (5Y CDS 255-265, midday 1 July).

See page 6 for analyst certification and important disclosures.


J.P. Morgan does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may
have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their
investment decision.
Olek Keenan, CFA Europe Credit Research
(44-20) 7777-0017 01 July 2010
[email protected]

The agenda for the energy pact


The official points for discussion among the various parties are:

1) Generation mix to 2020 including coal, CCGTs and renewables;

2) Full liberalisation and a stronger role for regulator;

3) Costs of the electricity sector;

4) Infrastructure development;

5) Strengthening of energy efficiency measures;

6) Nuclear safety.

The tariff deficit issue


When Spain's electricity generation and supply market was liberalised by Electricity
Industry Law 54/1997, the ability to set the access tariff revenue remained with the
government, leaving open the possibility that the revenues of the system would be
insufficient to meet all the costs incurred. Rising fuel prices and a tighter market for
generation has driven repeated tariff deficits since 2000, and the Royal Decree Law
2/2005 made explicit that deficits had to be financed by the utilities in a percentage
share that was set in that law. The amounts that all of the utilities had recorded as
tariff deficit receivables in their balance sheets at YE09 are shown below, with
Endesa having both the largest share of the mainland deficit and a separate claim for
cost overruns in the supply of electricity in the islands 2001-8.

Table 1: Tariff deficit receivables v. EBITDA


€ million
Mainland Islands EBITDA
Endesa 4 656 2 242 7 228
Iberdrola 3 618 - 6 815
Gas Natural 1 267 - 3 937
EDP 536 - 3 363
Source: Company reports.

The government has repeatedly recognized the deficits that have arisen, although
there has been debate about the exact amount that the utilities claim, and the
companies have retained the right to recover the deficits, meaning they can recognize
the receivables in their balance sheets. The specific annual deficits have been
matched for collection from electricity customers via surcharges within the tariff, and
the utilities have sold some of these receivables to financial institutions, notably the
whole of the 2007 deficit.

In mid 2009, a new law was introduced to provide a permanent solution for the
problem by transitioning towards a tariff that fully meets costs by 2013, with any
shortfall in one period immediately recovered in the next. In the interim a tariff
deficit of up to €3.5bn in 2009, €3bn in 2010, €2bn in 2011 and €1bn in 2012 will be
permitted to accumulate, and the historic and future deficit will all be collected via
charges made in the regulated part of the tariff (including network charges etc).

2
Olek Keenan, CFA Europe Credit Research
(44-20) 7777-0017 01 July 2010
[email protected]

In addition, the utilities will also be allowed to transfer (sell) any tariff deficit that
they owned to a new securitization fund to be set up by the government, which would
fund itself with the issuance of bonds which will benefit from a government
guarantee. The applicable laws have been put in place, and the fund now awaits only
the awarding of ratings and the filing of the CNMV prospectus. The current timetable
suggests this will be in July, and hence bond sales are likely to follow in September.
Once utilities notify the fund manager that they wish to sell the deficit, there are 12
months for the issuance of bonds to pay the utilities, after which he can only defer in
the event of exceptional market conditions. Clearly, however, the ability of Spanish
sovereign and sovereign-related entities to issue bonds at attractive spreads is
uncertain. As a result, we have always included these regulatory receivables as risky
assets with associated debt, until such time as they are actually transferred.

We believe that reductions in the amount of the tariff deficit that can be collected
would be very negative for the utilities, and are likely to be tempting for the
government because they are essentially costless to customers and voters. However,
it would break a very well established understanding that the utilities are funding the
deficit not bearing it. Yesterday’s press reported that Minister for Industry Sebastian
has stated that there will be no revision to any of the decrees relating to the tariff
deficit, and that the securitization should proceed. If this position holds through the
negotiations, that would be much better news for all of the utilities and especially
Iberdrola and Endesa.

Taxes on hydro and nuclear assets


There has also been press speculation that there could be additional taxes imposed on
hydro and nuclear generation (El Confidencial website, 12 May). This type of asset is
likely more "susceptible" relative to other forms of generation given low operating
costs once the large initial capital investment has been made, and most of this
investment in Spanish plants was made many years ago. In addition, these assets
benefited from "windfall" profits as carbon was added as a cost of production for
marginal cost generators.

The PP stated that the parties are investigating imposing a tax on nuclear life
extensions in a “model of inspiration […] closer to what the German government are
doing”. The ruling Socialist party has historically been against nuclear life
extensions, and seemed to reiterate that view this week, so it’s not clear what would
be included in the pact. However, this kind of deal is much less negative for the
utilities in terms of the NPV impact as the longer life offsets at least part of the tax.
However, a tax could also be imposed on an upfront basis, which could be a potential
challenge to liquidity.

Renewable subsidies
Renewable generation capacity requires subsidy to be profitable, and all European
countries have mechanisms to provide higher prices for electricity generated from
renewable sources. The Spanish system has historically been very attractive for
renewable investors, as Spain has built up one of the largest renewable generation
parks in Europe, partly because Spain has very few domestic energy resources
making renewables politically important. However, this has also increased the cost of
electricity in Spain materially, and there have been repeated press reports over recent

3
Olek Keenan, CFA Europe Credit Research
(44-20) 7777-0017 01 July 2010
[email protected]

months that renewable subsidies could be reduced, at least with regard to the huge
amount of very high cost solar capacity registered in the last year.

Across countries, the usual framework for subsidy is that a plant agrees the lifetime
subsidy arrangement at the beginning of its construction, and so while subsidies may
be reduced for future plants, especially where the technology has become more cost-
competitive over time (as is the case for onshore wind), existing plants operate under
the original agreement. Both political parties are heavily committed to renewable
growth and to the existing renewable fleet, but we think that changes cannot be ruled
out in Spain because:

1. Spain has one of the highest proportions of wind in its generation mix in Europe
(representing c.18%) and there is a limit to how far it can grow given it’s an
intermittent source of power and cannot be relied in isolation to support a
country's electricity needs.

2. Solar technology is expensive and its commerciality in large scale grid use
remains largely unproven, so the size of subsidies required to promote
investment in this technology are significant.

3. Currently, Spain has overcapacity with respect to CCGT plants, which could be
utilized more if renewable investment were reduced for a time. This will produce
more CO2, but Spain is a relatively low carbon emitter in the European context
in any case.

Figure 1: Utility and sovereign bond curves (changes)


%
6 IBESM (25th May) GASSM (25th May) SPAIN (25th May)
IBESM (30th Jun) GASSM (30th Jun) SPAIN (30th Jun)
5.5

4.5

3.5

2.5

1.5
Jul-09 Apr-12 Dec-14 Sep-17 Jun-20 Mar-23 Dec-25

Source: J.P. Morgan.

4
Olek Keenan, CFA Europe Credit Research
(44-20) 7777-0017 01 July 2010
[email protected]

Relative exposures
Figure 2: Gas Natural - Spanish generation output (FY09) Figure 3: Endesa - Spanish generation output (FY09)
Special regime (inc.
Special regime (inc.
renewables) CCGT
renewables)
6% 11%
Hydro 5%
9% Hydro
15%

Nuclear Imported coal


11% 20%

Other thermal
5%

CCGT Domestic coal


69% 9%
Nuclear
40%

Source: Company reports.


Includes Portugal
Source: Company reports.

Figure 4: Iberdrola – Spanish generation output Figure 5: Spain – National generation output
Other
Renewables Hydro Renewables
2%
16% 15% 9%
Oil Gas
8% 29%
Cogeneration
4%

Coal
22%
Nuclear
CCGT
34%
28%
Nuclear
Hydro 20%
Coal 10%
3%
Source: Company reports. Source: J.P. Morgan estimates, Company data.

5
Olek Keenan, CFA Europe Credit Research
(44-20) 7777-0017 01 July 2010
[email protected]

Analyst Certification:
The research analyst(s) denoted by an “AC” on the cover of this report certifies (or, where multiple research analysts are primarily
responsible for this report, the research analyst denoted by an “AC” on the cover or within the document individually certifies, with
respect to each security or issuer that the research analyst covers in this research) that: (1) all of the views expressed in this report
accurately reflect his or her personal views about any and all of the subject securities or issuers; and (2) no part of any of the research
analyst’s compensation was, is, or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views expressed by the
research analyst(s) in this report.
Important Disclosures

• Market Maker/ Liquidity Provider: JPMSL and/or an affiliate is a market maker and/or liquidity provider in Gas Natural,
Iberdrola.
• Lead or Co-manager: JPMSI or its affiliates acted as lead or co-manager in a public offering of equity and/or debt securities for
Iberdrola within the past 12 months.
• Other Significant Financial Interests: JPMSI and/or its affiliates own a position of 1 million USD or more in the debt securities of
Gas Natural, Iberdrola.
• Client of the Firm: Gas Natural is or was in the past 12 months a client of JPMSI; during the past 12 months, JPMSI provided to the
company investment banking services, non-investment banking securities-related services and non-securities-related services.
Iberdrola is or was in the past 12 months a client of JPMSI; during the past 12 months, JPMSI provided to the company investment
banking services, non-investment banking securities-related services and non-securities-related services.
• Investment Banking (past 12 months): JPMSI or its affiliates received in the past 12 months compensation for investment banking
services from Gas Natural, Iberdrola.
• Investment Banking (next 3 months): JPMSI or its affiliates expect to receive, or intend to seek, compensation for investment
banking services in the next three months from Gas Natural, Iberdrola.
• Non-Investment Banking Compensation: JPMSI has received compensation in the past 12 months for products or services other
than investment banking from Gas Natural, Iberdrola. An affiliate of JPMSI has received compensation in the past 12 months for
products or services other than investment banking from Gas Natural, Iberdrola.

Gas Natural - J.P. Morgan Recommendation History


Date Rating Instrument
03 Feb 05 Underweight CDS
Recommendation changes made by J.P. Morgan Credit Research Analysts in the subject company over the past 12 months (or, if no recommendation
changes were made in that period, the most recent change).

Iberdrola - J.P. Morgan Recommendation History


Date Rating Instrument
07 Aug 08 Overweight 5Y CDS
Recommendation changes made by J.P. Morgan Credit Research Analysts in the subject company over the past 12 months (or, if no recommendation
changes were made in that period, the most recent change).

Explanation of Credit Research Ratings:


Ratings System: J.P. Morgan uses the following sector/issuer portfolio weightings: Overweight (over the next three months, the
recommended risk position is expected to outperform the relevant index, sector, or benchmark), Neutral (over the next three months, the
recommended risk position is expected to perform in line with the relevant index, sector, or benchmark), and Underweight (over the next
three months, the recommended risk position is expected to underperform the relevant index, sector, or benchmark). J.P. Morgan’s
Emerging Market research uses a rating of Marketweight, which is equivalent to a Neutral rating.
Valuation & Methodology: In J.P. Morgan’s credit research, we assign a rating to each issuer (Overweight, Underweight or Neutral)
based on our credit view of the issuer and the relative value of its securities, taking into account the ratings assigned to the issuer by credit
rating agencies and the market prices for the issuer’s securities. Our credit view of an issuer is based upon our opinion as to whether the
issuer will be able service its debt obligations when they become due and payable. We assess this by analyzing, among other things, the
issuer’s credit position using standard credit ratios such as cash flow to debt and fixed charge coverage (including and excluding capital
investment). We also analyze the issuer’s ability to generate cash flow by reviewing standard operational measures for comparable
companies in the sector, such as revenue and earnings growth rates, margins, and the composition of the issuer’s balance sheet relative to
the operational leverage in its business.

6
Olek Keenan, CFA Europe Credit Research
(44-20) 7777-0017 01 July 2010
[email protected]

J.P. Morgan Credit Research Ratings Distribution, as of June 30, 2010


Overweight Neutral Underweight
EMEA Credit Research Universe 26% 50% 25%
IB clients* 55% 64% 55%
Represents Ratings on the most liquid bond or 5-year CDS for all companies under coverage.
*Percentage of investment banking clients in each rating category.

Analysts’ Compensation: The research analysts responsible for the preparation of this report receive compensation based upon various
factors, including the quality and accuracy of research, client feedback, competitive factors and overall firm revenues. The firm’s overall
revenues include revenues from its investment banking and fixed income business units.

Other Disclosures

J.P. Morgan is the global brand name for J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. (JPMSI) and its non-US affiliates worldwide. J.P. Morgan Cazenove is a
brand name for equity research produced by J.P. Morgan Securities Ltd.; J.P. Morgan Equities Limited; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Dubai
Branch; and J.P. Morgan Bank International LLC. QIB ONLY
Options related research: If the information contained herein regards options related research, such information is available only to persons who
have received the proper option risk disclosure documents. For a copy of the Option Clearing Corporation’s Characteristics and Risks of
Standardized Options, please contact your J.P. Morgan Representative or visit the OCC’s website at
http://www.optionsclearing.com/publications/risks/riskstoc.pdf.
Legal Entities Disclosures
U.S.: JPMSI is a member of NYSE, FINRA and SIPC. J.P. Morgan Futures Inc. is a member of the NFA. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is a
member of FDIC and is authorized and regulated in the UK by the Financial Services Authority. U.K.: J.P. Morgan Securities Ltd. (JPMSL) is a
member of the London Stock Exchange and is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Registered in England & Wales No.
2711006. Registered Office 125 London Wall, London EC2Y 5AJ. South Africa: J.P. Morgan Equities Limited is a member of the Johannesburg
Securities Exchange and is regulated by the FSB. Hong Kong: J.P. Morgan Securities (Asia Pacific) Limited (CE number AAJ321) is regulated
by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority and the Securities and Futures Commission in Hong Kong. Korea: J.P. Morgan Securities (Far East) Ltd,
Seoul Branch, is regulated by the Korea Financial Supervisory Service. Australia: J.P. Morgan Australia Limited (ABN 52 002 888 011/AFS
Licence No: 238188) is regulated by ASIC and J.P. Morgan Securities Australia Limited (ABN 61 003 245 234/AFS Licence No: 238066) is a
Market Participant with the ASX and regulated by ASIC. Taiwan: J.P.Morgan Securities (Taiwan) Limited is a participant of the Taiwan Stock
Exchange (company-type) and regulated by the Taiwan Securities and Futures Bureau. India: J.P. Morgan India Private Limited is a member of
the National Stock Exchange of India Limited and Bombay Stock Exchange Limited and is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Board of
India. Thailand: JPMorgan Securities (Thailand) Limited is a member of the Stock Exchange of Thailand and is regulated by the Ministry of
Finance and the Securities and Exchange Commission. Indonesia: PT J.P. Morgan Securities Indonesia is a member of the Indonesia Stock
Exchange and is regulated by the BAPEPAM LK. Philippines: J.P. Morgan Securities Philippines Inc. is a member of the Philippine Stock
Exchange and is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Brazil: Banco J.P. Morgan S.A. is regulated by the Comissao de Valores
Mobiliarios (CVM) and by the Central Bank of Brazil. Mexico: J.P. Morgan Casa de Bolsa, S.A. de C.V., J.P. Morgan Grupo Financiero is a
member of the Mexican Stock Exchange and authorized to act as a broker dealer by the National Banking and Securities Exchange Commission.
Singapore: This material is issued and distributed in Singapore by J.P. Morgan Securities Singapore Private Limited (JPMSS) [MICA (P)
020/01/2010 and Co. Reg. No.: 199405335R] which is a member of the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited and is regulated by the
Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and/or JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Singapore branch (JPMCB Singapore) which is regulated by the
MAS. Malaysia: This material is issued and distributed in Malaysia by JPMorgan Securities (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (18146-X) which is a
Participating Organization of Bursa Malaysia Berhad and a holder of Capital Markets Services License issued by the Securities Commission in
Malaysia. Pakistan: J. P. Morgan Pakistan Broking (Pvt.) Ltd is a member of the Karachi Stock Exchange and regulated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission of Pakistan. Saudi Arabia: J.P. Morgan Saudi Arabia Ltd. is authorised by the Capital Market Authority of the Kingdom
of Saudi Arabia (CMA) to carry out dealing as an agent, arranging, advising and custody, with respect to securities business under licence number
35-07079 and its registered address is at 8th Floor, Al-Faisaliyah Tower, King Fahad Road, P.O. Box 51907, Riyadh 11553, Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia. Dubai: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Dubai Branch is regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) and its registered
address is Dubai International Financial Centre - Building 3, Level 7, PO Box 506551, Dubai, UAE.
Country and Region Specific Disclosures
U.K. and European Economic Area (EEA): Unless specified to the contrary, issued and approved for distribution in the U.K. and the EEA by
JPMSL. Investment research issued by JPMSL has been prepared in accordance with JPMSL's policies for managing conflicts of interest arising
as a result of publication and distribution of investment research. Many European regulators require that a firm to establish, implement and
maintain such a policy. This report has been issued in the U.K. only to persons of a kind described in Article 19 (5), 38, 47 and 49 of the Financial
Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (all such persons being referred to as "relevant persons"). This document must
not be acted on or relied on by persons who are not relevant persons. Any investment or investment activity to which this document relates is only
available to relevant persons and will be engaged in only with relevant persons. In other EEA countries, the report has been issued to persons
regarded as professional investors (or equivalent) in their home jurisdiction. Australia: This material is issued and distributed by JPMSAL in

7
Olek Keenan, CFA Europe Credit Research
(44-20) 7777-0017 01 July 2010
[email protected]

Australia to “wholesale clients” only. JPMSAL does not issue or distribute this material to “retail clients.” The recipient of this material must not
distribute it to any third party or outside Australia without the prior written consent of JPMSAL. For the purposes of this paragraph the terms
“wholesale client” and “retail client” have the meanings given to them in section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. Germany: This material is
distributed in Germany by J.P. Morgan Securities Ltd., Frankfurt Branch and J.P.Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Frankfurt Branch which are
regulated by the Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht. Hong Kong: The 1% ownership disclosure as of the previous month end
satisfies the requirements under Paragraph 16.5(a) of the Hong Kong Code of Conduct for Persons Licensed by or Registered with the Securities
and Futures Commission. (For research published within the first ten days of the month, the disclosure may be based on the month end data from
two months’ prior.) J.P. Morgan Broking (Hong Kong) Limited is the liquidity provider for derivative warrants issued by J.P. Morgan Structured
Products B.V. and listed on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited. An updated list can be found on HKEx website:
http://www.hkex.com.hk/prod/dw/Lp.htm. Japan: There is a risk that a loss may occur due to a change in the price of the shares in the case of
share trading, and that a loss may occur due to the exchange rate in the case of foreign share trading. In the case of share trading, JPMorgan
Securities Japan Co., Ltd., will be receiving a brokerage fee and consumption tax (shouhizei) calculated by multiplying the executed price by the
commission rate which was individually agreed between JPMorgan Securities Japan Co., Ltd., and the customer in advance. Financial Instruments
Firms: JPMorgan Securities Japan Co., Ltd., Kanto Local Finance Bureau (kinsho) No. 82 Participating Association / Japan Securities Dealers
Association, The Financial Futures Association of Japan. Korea: This report may have been edited or contributed to from time to time by
affiliates of J.P. Morgan Securities (Far East) Ltd, Seoul Branch. Singapore: JPMSS and/or its affiliates may have a holding in any of the
securities discussed in this report; for securities where the holding is 1% or greater, the specific holding is disclosed in the Important Disclosures
section above. India: For private circulation only, not for sale. Pakistan: For private circulation only, not for sale. New Zealand: This
material is issued and distributed by JPMSAL in New Zealand only to persons whose principal business is the investment of money or who, in the
course of and for the purposes of their business, habitually invest money. JPMSAL does not issue or distribute this material to members of "the
public" as determined in accordance with section 3 of the Securities Act 1978. The recipient of this material must not distribute it to any third
party or outside New Zealand without the prior written consent of JPMSAL. Canada: The information contained herein is not, and under no
circumstances is to be construed as, a prospectus, an advertisement, a public offering, an offer to sell securities described herein, or solicitation of
an offer to buy securities described herein, in Canada or any province or territory thereof. Any offer or sale of the securities described herein in
Canada will be made only under an exemption from the requirements to file a prospectus with the relevant Canadian securities regulators and only
by a dealer properly registered under applicable securities laws or, alternatively, pursuant to an exemption from the dealer registration requirement
in the relevant province or territory of Canada in which such offer or sale is made. The information contained herein is under no circumstances to
be construed as investment advice in any province or territory of Canada and is not tailored to the needs of the recipient. To the extent that the
information contained herein references securities of an issuer incorporated, formed or created under the laws of Canada or a province or territory
of Canada, any trades in such securities must be conducted through a dealer registered in Canada. No securities commission or similar regulatory
authority in Canada has reviewed or in any way passed judgment upon these materials, the information contained herein or the merits of the
securities described herein, and any representation to the contrary is an offence. Dubai: This report has been issued to persons regarded as
professional clients as defined under the DFSA rules.
General: Additional information is available upon request. Information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but JPMorgan
Chase & Co. or its affiliates and/or subsidiaries (collectively J.P. Morgan) do not warrant its completeness or accuracy except with respect to any
disclosures relative to JPMSI and/or its affiliates and the analyst’s involvement with the issuer that is the subject of the research. All pricing is as
of the close of market for the securities discussed, unless otherwise stated. Opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this
material and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This material is not intended as an offer or
solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. The opinions and recommendations herein do not take into account individual
client circumstances, objectives, or needs and are not intended as recommendations of particular securities, financial instruments or strategies to
particular clients. The recipient of this report must make its own independent decisions regarding any securities or financial instruments
mentioned herein. JPMSI distributes in the U.S. research published by non-U.S. affiliates and accepts responsibility for its contents. Periodic
updates may be provided on companies/industries based on company specific developments or announcements, market conditions or any other
publicly available information. Clients should contact analysts and execute transactions through a J.P. Morgan subsidiary or affiliate in their home
jurisdiction unless governing law permits otherwise.
“Other Disclosures” last revised March 1, 2010.

Copyright 2010 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved. This report or any portion hereof may not be reprinted, sold or
redistributed without the written consent of J.P. Morgan.

You might also like