Carbon Removal PDF
Carbon Removal PDF
Carbon Removal PDF
ISSN: 2041-0492
M axwell Scientific Organization, 2010
Submitted Date: July 19, 2010
Accepted Date: September 06, 2010
Corresponding Author: C. Mborah, Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Mines Tecnology, Tarkwa, Ghana
245
2 (R-NH2 ) + CO 2 + H 2 O X (R-HN3 ) 2 CO 3
where,
R = CH 3 CH 2 OH (ethanol)
This reaction is reversible, allowing the CO 2 gas to be
liberated by heating in a separate stripping column as
described by the Fluor Daniel ECO NA MIN E FG P rocess.
Therefore, the major advantage to this techn ique is that,
in the ideal situation, the amine is not consumed and may
be continuously recycled through the process.
The amine used in this p rocess is most commonly
one
of
several
alkanolamines
including
monoethanolamine (MEA) as used by the Fluor Daniel
ECONAMINE FG Process, diethanolamine (DE A),
methyldiethanolamine (MDEA ), or diisopropanolamine
(DIPA).The technology was originally developed not for
the purpose of carbo n sequestration, but in order to
sweeten natural gas streams by removing CO 2
(Maddox, 1 97 4). M ore recently, it was succe ssfully
adopted for recovery of CO 2 from flue gas of coal-fired
electric pow er gen erating plants (Arnold et al., 1982). In
this case, rather than CO 2 sequestration, the CO 2 has been
used for com merc ial purposes such as enha nced oil
recovery and the carbonation of brine as we ll as food
industry uses. Currently there are three electric power
generating stations in the U. S. that capture CO 2 from flue
and six other major flue gas CO 2 capture facilities
worldwide. All nine use MEA as the chemical absorbent
(Herzog, 1999).
There is only one operation in the world that
performs CO 2 separation for the purpose of sequestration.
246
247
Fig. 4: Heat recovery and power generation cycle (Source: Rnning et al., 1998)
turbines since LPG burns very clean and produces very
little amounts of green house gases.
248
2(R-NH2 ) + H 2 O + CO 2 W (R-NH 3 ) 2 CO 3
This reaction is reversible and the equilibrium can be
altered by altering the temperature. Hence at low
temperatures in the range of 20-70C as in the absorption
column, the equilibrium shifts to the right and the forw ard
reaction is favoured hence CO 2 is absorbed by the MEA
(18) in Fig. 6. At high temperatures usually in the range
of 120-150C, the equilibrium shifts to the left and the
reverse reaction is favoured hence the MEA (18) gives off
the carbon dioxide.
Inside the absorption column (7) are gas absorption
membranes (19). The gas absorption membranes (19) are
membranes which are employed as contacting devices
between the exhaust gas (17) inside the absorption
column (7) and the MEA (18). The separation is caused
by the presence of the absorption liquid (MEA) on one
side of the membrane which selectively removes the
carbon dioxide from the exhaust gas on the other side of
membrane. The m embran e (19) is intended to provide a
contacting area which prevents mixing of the exhaust gas
(11) and the absorption liquid (18). The membrane (19)
however should be highly permeable to the carbon
dioxide (16) which is required to be removed. The
selectivity in the separation process is derived from the
absorption liquid. A high selective separation can be
achieved throug h an appropriate choice of the absorption
liquid (Fig. 6).
The membrane should be porous and hydrophobic
and its pores size should be about 0.2 :m in diameter. The
membrane in com bination with a suitable absorption
liquid (in this case the amine MEA ) enhances the CO 2
absorption process. As a resu lt of the memb ranes
hydrophobic nature and small pore size the exhaust gas
and MEA flow are kept separate.
252
CONCLUSION
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
254