Scribd
Upload
45 views8 pages

6 Circulation and Boundary Conditions

1) The document discusses circulation, which is the line integral of the electric field E around a closed path C. For a static electric field E to be conservative, the circulation around any closed path C must be equal to 0. 2) An example is provided of calculating the circulation of a given electric field E(x,y,z)=x/ρ around a rectangular closed path, verifying it is equal to 0. 3) Boundary conditions for static electric fields are derived from Gauss' law and Stokes' theorem, requiring the tangential component of E and normal component of D to be continuous across boundaries, while the normal component of D can change by the surface charge density.

Uploaded by

EviVardaki
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
45 views8 pages

6 Circulation and Boundary Conditions

1) The document discusses circulation, which is the line integral of the electric field E around a closed path C. For a static electric field E to be conservative, the circulation around any closed path C must be equal to 0. 2) An example is provided of calculating the circulation of a given electric field E(x,y,z)=x/ρ around a rectangular closed path, verifying it is equal to 0. 3) Boundary conditions for static electric fields are derived from Gauss' law and Stokes' theorem, requiring the tangential component of E and normal component of D to be continuous across boundaries, while the normal component of D can change by the surface charge density.

Uploaded by

EviVardaki
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

6 Circulation and boundary conditions

Since curl-free static electric fields have path-independent line integrals, it


follows that over closed paths C (when points p and o coincide)
!
E dl = 0,

z
y
dS
C

lj
Ej

"
where the C E dl is called the circulation of field E over closed path C
bounding a surface S (see margin).
Example 1: Consider the static electric field variation
E(x, y, z) = x

Solution: Integration path C is shown in "the figure in the margin. With the help of
the figure we expand the circulation C E dl as
# 3
# 4
# 3
# 0
x
3
x
(3)
E =
x xdx +
x ydy +
x xdx +
x
ydy
"o
x=3 "o
y=0 "o
x=3 "o
y=4
# 3
# 3
x
x
=
dx + 0 +
dx + 0 = 0.
x=3 "o
x=3 "o

x
Closed loop integral over path
C enclosing surface S.
Note that the area increment
dS of surface S is taken by
convention to point in the
right-hand-rule direction
with respect to "circulation"
direction C.

x
"o

that will be encountered within a uniformly charged slab of an infinite extent in


y and z directions and a finite width in x" direction centered about x = 0. Show
that this field E satisfies the condition C E dl = 0 for a rectangular closed
path C with vertices at (x, y, z) = (3, 0, 0), (3, 0, 0), (3, 4, 0), and (3, 4, 0)
traversed in the order of the vertices given.

o=p

(-3,4,0)

(-3,0,0)

(3,4,0)

(3,0,0)

Note that in expanding

"

E dl above for the given path C, we took dl as xdx

and ydy in turns (along horizontal and vertical edges of C, respectively) and

ordered the integration limits in x and y to traverse C in a counter-clockwise


direction as indicated in the diagram.

z
y

Vector fields E having zero circulations over all closed paths C are
known as conservative fields (for obvious reasons having to do with
their use in modeling static fields compatible with conservation theorems).
The concepts of curl-free and conservative fields overlap, that is
!
E dl = 0 E = 0
C

over all closed paths C and at each r.

dS
C

dl
E

x
STOKES THM:
Circulation of E around close
path C equals the flux over
enclosed surface S of the curl
of E taken in direction of dS.
dS points in right-hand-rule
direction with respect to
"circulation" direction C.

The above relationship between circulation and curl is also a consequence of Stokes theorem (discussed in MATH 241) which asserts
that
Stokes thm.
!
#
E dl = E dS,
where

the integration surface S on the right is bounded by the closed


integration contour C of the left side, and
2

the incremental area element dS on the right points across area S z


in the direction indicated by a right-hand rule as follows:
Point your right thumb in chosen circulation direction C; then your
right fingers point through surface S in the direction that should be
adopted for dS.
"
Given Stokes theorem, C E dl = 0 follows immediately for all
C, if E = 0 is true over all r.
Verification of Stokes thm: Stokes theorem applies to all contours
C of all sizes and orientations and their enclosed surfaces S of any
shape. For a small rectangular contour on a constant x plane with
sufficiently small y and z dimensions parallel to y and z axes (see
figure in the margin), we have
!
E dl (Ez|2 Ez|1 )z (Ey|4 Ey|3)y,
C

an approximation that can also be re-arranged as


!
Ez|2 Ez|1 Ey|4 Ey|3
E dl (

)
x yz x.
y
z
C

Right hand side above is clearly an approximation also for


( E) dS = ( E) dydz x = (
3

Ez Ey

)
x dydz x.
y
z

y
dS
C

dl
E

x
STOKES THM:
Circulation of E around close
path C equals the flux over
enclosed surface S of the curl
of E taken in direction of dS.
dS points in right-hand-rule
direction with respect to
"circulation" direction C.

(x, y, z + z)
y

dS = yz x

(x, y + y, z)

1
3

(x, y, z)

Matching the approximations and taking the limit of vanishing y and


z, we realize that for any infinitesimal area element dS of an arbitrary
direction,
!
E dS =

dC

C
S

E dl

where dC denotes the bounding infinitesimal contour of dS traversed


in the right-hand rule direction. Stokes theorem for an arbitrary C over
a finite enclosed area S is obtained
by superposing these infinitesimals
"
$
the left side then becomes S E dS and the right side C E dl
after cancellations of opposing line integral contributions coming from
overlapping adjacent segments (see figure in the margin).

dl
E
Sum of circulations over small
squares cancel in the interior
edges and only survive around the
exterior path C. This way,
circulation around C matches
the sum of the fluxes of curl E
calculated over the small squares.

Laws of
Stokes theorem clearly implies that curl is circulation per unit electrostatics:
area, just as the divergence theorem showed that divergence is
flux per unit volume. The only difference is, curl also has a
direction, which is the normal unit of the plane that contains the
E = 0
maximal value of circulation per unit area found at that location
"o E =
over all possible orientations of dS.
We can now summarize the general constraints governing static electric fields
as
E(r) = 0, D(r) = (r), where D(r) = "oE(r).
Vector fields E(r) and D(r) governed by these equations will in general
be continuous functions of position coordinates r = (x, y, z) except at
4

They also apply quasi-statically


over a region of dimension L
when a time-varying field source
(r, t) has a time-constant much
longer than the propagation time
delay L/c of E(r, t) field variations across the region (c is the
speed of light).

In electro-quasistatics (EQS)
E(r, t) will be accompanied by
a slowly varying magnetic field
B(r, t) (to be studied starting in
Lecture 12).

boundary surfaces where charge density function (r) requires a representation in terms of a surface charge density s (r).
For instance, according to our earlier results, static electric field
of a charge density (see sketch at the margin)

(r) = s (z)

s
s
E(r) = z sgn(z) D(r) = z sgn(z).
2"o
2
Consider a superposition of these fields with fields Eo(r) and
Do(r) = "oEo(r) produced by arbitrary continuous sources,
namely (macroscopic) fields
s
s
E(r) = z sgn(z)+Eo(r) and D(r) = z sgn(z)+"oEo(r).
2"o
2

would be
0

!1

!2
!2

!1

0
x

Since fields Eo(r) and Do(r) vary continuously, these field expressions
must satisfy
where

z (D+ D ) = s and z (E+ E ) = 0


E+ E(x, y, 0+) and E E(x, y, 0 )

refer to limiting values of E at z = 0 plane from above and below,


z=0
respectively, and likewise for
D+ D(x, y, 0+) and D D(x, y, 0 ).
5

D+
z

The above boundary condition equations can be written in a more


general form (see margin for justification) as
n
(D+ D ) = s and n
(E+ E ) = 0
where n
denotes a unit vector normal to any surface of an arbitrary
orientation carrying a surface charge density s, while field vectors with
superscripts + and indicate limiting values of fields measured on
either side of the charged surface (with n
pointing from to +).
The equations can be further simplified as
Dn+ Dn = s and Et+ = Et
where Dn and Et refer to normal component of D and tangential
component of E, respectively. Clearly, these boundary conditions say that at any surface S,
tangential component of electric field E needs to be continuous, but
normal component of D can change by an amount equal to
the charge density s carried by the surface.

Constraint

E dl = 0

around the dotted path yields


Et+ = Et
in w 0 limit.

Gausss law

D dS = QV

applied over the dotted volume (seen in


profile) yields
Dn+ Dn = s
in w 0 limit.

D+
D

D = 0 for x < 0.
s = 2C/m2

so = ?

Example 2:
Measurements indicate that D = 0 in the region x < 0.
Also, x = 0 and x = 5 m planes contain surface charge densities of s = 2 C/m2 and
so , respectively.
Determine so and D for < x < if there are no other charge distributions.
Solution:
Since the normal component of D must increase by s = 2 C/m2 when we cross the
charged surface x = 0, we must have D = x2 C/m2 in the region 0 < x < 5 m.
Having D = 0 in the region x < 0 requires that the field due to surface charge so
on x = 5 m plane must cancel the field due s = 2 C/m2 on x = 0 plane this
requires that so be 2 C/m2 .
In that case D = 0 in the region x > 5 m, because D must increase by so = 2
C/m2 when we cross the charged surface at x = 5 m.

y
x
x=5m

D = 3
y for x < 0.
s = 2C/m2

Example 3: In the region x < 0 measurements indicate a constant displacement field


D = 3
y C/m2. Also, x = 0 and x = 5 m planes contain surface charge densities
of s = 2 C/m2 and s = 6 C/m2 respectively. Determine D for x > 0 if D is
known to be uniform in the intervals 0 < x < 5 m and x > 5 m.
Solution: First we note that E = D
= y !3o V/m is tangential to x = 0 and x = 5 m
!o
surfaces. Since the tangential component of E cannot change at any boundary,
we will have a uniform Ey = !3o in all regions, < x < , implying that
Dy = 3 C/m2 throughout (caused by charges at |y| ).
Second, we note that normal component of D with respect to x = 0 and x = 5 m
surfaces, namely Dx , is zero in z < 0. Since the normal component of D must
increase by an amount s when we cross a charged surface, we must have Dx = 2
C/m2 in the region 0 < x < 5 m, and Dx = 2 + (6) = 4 C/m2 in x > 5 m.
In summary,

for x < 0,
y3,
C.
D = x2 + y3,
for 0 < x < 5 m m
2

x4 + y3, for x > 5 m

s = 6C/m2

y
x
x=5m

You might also like