Law and Ethics
Law and Ethics
Law and Ethics
The law is set of the rules which is created by sovereign state to keep social order, legal certainty and
justice in society. Law is guiding of behavior for individuals. It is a set of rules and principles that
govern any society. It is a compilation of rights and duties, providing rules on how people should
behave and the remedy for when something happens as a result of not following such rules.
2.
The law serves many purposes and functions in society. Four principal purposes and functions are
establishing standards, maintaining order, resolving disputes and protecting liberties and rights.
3.
This is an offshoot of establishing standards. Some semblance of order is necessary in a civil society
and is therefore reflected in the law. The lawwhen enforcedprovides order consistent with
societys guidelines.
4.
Disputes are unavoidable in a society made of persons with different needs, wants, values, and
views. The law provides a formal means for resolving disputesthe court system. There is a federal
court system and each state has its own separate court system. There are also various less formal
means for resolving disputescollectively called alternative dispute resolution (ADR).
5.
A purpose and function of the law is to protect various liberties and rights from violations or
unreasonable intrusions by persons, organizations, or government. Example: Someone who believes
that his free speech rights have been prohibited by the government may pursue a remedy by
bringing a case in the courts.
6.
What is norm?
Norm is an accepted standard or a way of behaving or doing things that most people agree with. It is
also a situation or type of behaviour that is expected and considered to be typical.
7.
Function of a legal norm is to maintain order, prevent conflict and shape and development of society.
9.
Customs the eldest sources of law ; legislative normsmaking process and judcial lawmaking
felxibility, individuality, shaping the law.
10.
There are two main forms of sources of law/norms. List them and shortly explain?
2.
3.
Interna onal agreements and trea es on human right (both common law and civil law)
4.
5.
Case, precedents and court decisions created by higher courts (just for common law)
6.
Regula ons - Individual decisions by the courts or by the administra ve bodies (both
or a rgime. Legi macy is "a value whereby something or someone is recognized and
accepted as right and proper". (sources of legi macy: God in theocra c regime, elec on,
tradi on, leaders charisma)
2) Legi mate law: The people who are living current society should be consent/okay the rules
are suitable your society and life.
1. What are social norms?
Social norms are rules of behavior that are considered acceptable in a group or society. These are not
formal rules within society, but they s ll oer great control over the social behavior. People who do/do not
follow these norms may be experience rewards (social approval) or punishments (social disapproval).What
are religious norms?
Norm is an accepted standard or a way of behaving or doing things that most people agree with. It is also
a situa on or type of behaviour that is expected and considered to be typical. Thus, a religious norm is
accepted standard of behaving within a specic religious society that has its norms based on holy sripture
or any other spoken word of their authori es.
3. Give and shortly explain two examples of discipline/department for public and private law?
public law:
o Criminal law: there must be done something (or not done if required to be
done) and to which there is a punishment attached. e.g. harm of a person.
o Administrative law: deals with the many interactions between government
agents and civilians or private organizations. e.g. taxes
private law:
o Property law: e.g. sales and ownership
o Contract law: e.g. purchase orders and employment agreements
4. What are the sources of the law in civil law tradition?
The source is court practice.
Historically speaking: compilation of Roman law , religious legal sources, and local custom.
Modern time: Acts of Parliament (Statutes), Regulations, Courts' Decisions, International treaties
and agreements on human rights
5. What are main differences between civil and common law traditions?
The common law tradition emerged in England during the Middle Ages and was applied within
British colonies across continents. The civil law tradition developed in continental Europe at
the same time and was applied in the colonies of European imperial powers such as Spain and
Portugal. Civil law was also adopted in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries by countries
formerly possessing distinctive legal traditions, such as Russia and Japan. Common law is
generally uncodified, there is no comprehensive compilation of legal rules and statutes. While
common law does rely on some scattered statutes, which are legislative decisions, it is largely
based on precedent, meaning the judicial decisions that have already been made in similar
cases. These precedents are maintained over time through the records of the courts as well as
historically documented in collections of case law known as yearbooks and reports. Judges
have an enormous role in shaping American and British law. Common law functions as a
contest between two opposing parties before a judge who moderates. A jury of
ordinary people without legal training decides on the facts of the case. The judge then
determines the appropriate sentence based on the jurys verdict. Civil Law, in contrast, is
codified. Countries with civil law systems have comprehensive, continuously updated legal
codes that specify all matters capable of being brought before a court, the applicable
procedure, and the appropriate punishment for each offense. Such codes distinguish between
different categories of law: substantive law establishes which acts are subject to criminal or
civil prosecution, procedural law establishes how to determine whether a particular action
constitutes a criminal act, and penal law establishes the appropriate penalty. In a civil law
system, the judges role is to establish the facts of the case and to apply the provisions of the
applicable code. The judges decision is consequently less crucial in shaping civil law than the
decisions of legislators and legal scholars who draft and interpret the codes.
6. Give at least two exemplary countries using civil and common law?
Common law: England and America; Civil law: Spain and Russia.
7. What are three solutions in the case of conflicts of norms?
1. Higher norm has priority over the lower norm
2. The later norm has priority over the older one
3. The special norm has priority over the general one/Lex specialisderogat legi generali
8. What is the difference between domestic and international law?
The most important difference between international law and domestic law is how they are
enforced. International law lacks a common executive, which means that there is no power
which can make a state or nation accept a court decision. Thus, the states or countries
operating under international law often have a weak sense of community, meaning that
obeying the law will often come second to that which is seen necessary for survival. Domestic
law, on the other hand, consists of all three branches of government executive, judicial, and
legislative. These three branches are separate from each other and are based on a system of
checks and balances. This limits the power of each branch so that no one becomes too
powerful. Unlike international law, those who violate domestic law will receive a punishment
deemed fit by a court executive, and this punishment will be enforced.
9. What is the difference between substantive and procedural law?
Procedural law provides the process that a case will go through (whether it goes to trial or
not). The procedural law determines how a proceeding concerning the enforcement of
substantive law will occur. Substantive law defines how the facts in the case will be handled,
as well as how the crime is to be charged. In essence, it deals with the substance of the matter.
Even though both are affected by Supreme Court opinions and subject to constitutional
interpretations, each serves a different function in the criminal justice system.
10.
The Education Code lay down: Final exam grade percentage is 50 %; mid-term exam 50
% and IUS Regulation on Exam regulate Final exam grade percentage is 40 %; mid-term exam
60 %. According to that fictional example, what is your solution in the context of conflicts of
norms?
We will apply first solution of conflicts (Higher norm has priority over the lower norm). By
giving priority to the norm having a higher rank, in this case The Educational Code, IUS will
have to accept that rule and adapt to its norms.
31. What is legality and legitimacy of rules? What is the difference between
two of them?
32.
33.
34.
What is sovereignty?
What are two main legal theories and which kind of elements are there to
compare each of two? Explain two elements.
Two main legal theories are: natural law theory and legal positivism. Natural law is a
philosophy that certain rights or values are inherent by virtue of human nature, and
universally cognizable through human reason. According to natural law legal theory, the
authority of legal standards necessarily derives, moral merit of those standards.The law
of nature, being determined by nature, is universal. Natural law is superior to the
human-made laws (positive law) of a given political community, society, or state. The
Positivist Doctrine accepts that we have no means of deriving law from a higher authority.
It points out that the law is made up of social norms which are generally accepted and
adhered to (Jellinek) or are formally enacted (Radbruch) or are regularly enforced (Austin,
Holmes, Llewllyn). Law is conceptually separate from moral and ethical values. Law is
posited by lawmakers, who are humans. Law is ultimately a matter of human custom or
convention.
We can compare each theory according to following elements: law maker, validity,
applying and obeying, relation with moral values, hierarchy of norms, function of the law,
justice or social order.(Explain two elements: The law maintains social order by
establishing and enforcing the rules of social intercourse, and by resolving disputes. In
classical terms, order means a lack of conflict.A legislator (or lawmaker) is a person who
writes and passes laws, especially someone who is a member of a legislature. Legislators
are usually politicians and are often elected by the people of the state.)
35.
What are the functions of law? Explain what is the meaning of this
functions?
In the classical theory, the law has certain functions.These are maintaining social order,
providing legal certainty/security, securing and keeping justice and fairness. These
functions is accepted almost with consensus among legal theorists. Providing legal
certainty is called facilitative function. It refers to the degree which the law helps in
36.
There are two ideas on the relationship between law and society: The mirror thesis and
the regulatory thesis.
A. THE MIRROR THESIS: This approach defend the law should reflects given society's value,
culture, tradition just like a mirror. law should reflect majority of society but should be
respectful and protect minorities. The law systematically embodies the values of some
people and disregards some values of others. The law of every modern state shows at a
thousand points the influence of both the accepted social morality and wider moral
ideas. The norms of law are derived from and reflect the customs and morality of society.
B. REGULATORY THESIS: In modern life, legal rules penetrate all of the life space. Dominant
trend in modern civil law is to regulate all of life area to maintain social order and legal
certainty. But it is not good method because the law is normativeand coercive.The law
should leave free optional space to individuals. It is boring sometimes you can come up
with rules in everywhere. Law is the instrument to maintain justice but not reshape
society. Shortly, the first idea, which is called mirror thesis, assumes laws
identity/uniformity with society; the second idea, which is called regulatory
thesis, assumes its function within society.
37.
38.
Normally, everyone must follow and obey the law. This is legal obligation: The legal rules are
binding. Moral obligation: Everyone should obey the rules morally. General or partial moral
obligation is questionable. The reasons of obeying the law: Sanctions/penalties, social order
and interest, moral reasons, utility of society, living together, social contract and consent, no
awareness etc. There are three theory: utilitarian/consequences, moral/categorical order,
legitimate state and rules/promise and duty. The conditions of obeying the law: Legitimate
state: In political science, legitimacy is the popular acceptance of an authority, usually a
governing law or a rgime. Legitimacy is "a value whereby something or someone is
recognized and accepted as right and proper". The sources of legitimacy: God in theocratic
regime, election, tradition, leaders charisma. Legitimate law: The people who are living
current society should be consent/okey the rules are suitable your society and life. Obeying
the law is a general moral obligation.
Legal personality is the sum of all characteristics of all human beings from the moment they
are born. All human beings have equal rights and duties, regardless of race, sex, age or
nationality.
Legal capacity for natural persons starts from the moment when they are not minors anymore,
that is, when they turn 18 years. At that point they may make binding amendments to their
rights, duties and obligations (writing a will, entering into contracts etc.)
Natural persons (their legal personality starts from the moment they are born basic human
rights (ability to have rights and duties), and their legal capacity (capacity to create and
dispose of rights and duties) starts when they turn 18) and legal persons or corporate bodies
(their legal personality and legal capacity are made at the same time when they are
established). Legal persons may be created under Public Law (eg. the State, National
Insurance, Broadcasting Corporations) and under Private Law (associations, charitable
societies, public limited companies, private limited companies, co-operatives).
46.Why are you personally obeying the law?Give your peronal reason?
I'm obeying the law because everyone must follow and obey the law.It's our legal
and moral obligation.Reasons why I'm obeying the law are:various penalties and
sanctions I can get for violating the law,then social order,moral reasons etc..
47.In this situation I would stop my car,because if I don't I would break legal
rule.Even though there aren't any cars or pedestrians ,my legal and moral
obligation is to stop.Crossing over the red light would be a risk,and if I break the
rule,I can be charged or jailed for breaking that rule if I get caught.
48.What are your obligations during the final exam?
Our obligations during final exams are:
We need to have required stuff for the exam(pencil,pen,calculator,rubber..)
We are not permitted to use mobile phones during exam
We mustn't cheat
..
..
49.What are differences between legal and moral rules?
Moral rules are rules people follow because they just believe they're right.Religous
people believe morals are imposed on us by God,but even non-religous people
have morals.
Legal rules are those imposed on us by society.They are more rigid and
codified,and punishments are prescribed for violators,and society hires police and
courts to enforce them.Morals are not actively enforced,unless they happen to
concide with legal rules.
50.