The Office Index 2q 2016

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

The Office Index

Second Quarter 2016

Asia Pacific leasing volumes down overall; select


markets performed well
Gross leasing activity declined 16% y-o-y in 2Q16, following
reasonably strong growth in Q1. The delayed impact of stock market
volatility in early 2016 and uncertainty caused by slowing economic
growth in China were largely responsible for the drop off in leasing
volumes. China leasing volumes, down 42% y-o-y, were the largest
drag on leasing activity. However, India also saw volumes decline
due in part to a lack of available space in Bangalore and slowing
demand from e-commerce firms.

Several markets recorded quarterly rent declines. Continued


economic weakness and high vacancy rates continued to put
downward pressure on Perth rents (4.7%). Landlords at older,
strata-title buildings in Delhi took a more flexible approach in lease
negotiations leading to a 3.7% rental decline there. A large volume of
supply and sustained consolidation in the banking sector saw
Singapore rents decline 3.3% q-o-q. Jakarta rents (2.8%) fell amid
sustained weakness in the oil and gas sector.

Several markets registered strong growth in leasing volumes led by


Tokyo where large ticket pre-commitments underpinned demand.
PRC financials and cost-saving relocations supported robust leasing
volumes in Hong Kong. Pre-commitments and take-up in newer
buildings saw Singapore volumes improve. Sydney leasing volumes
continued to perform well while Melbourne (due to a lack of available
space) and Perth (due to ongoing weakness in the local economy)
saw volumes decline. Overall Australia volumes declined 4% y-o-y.

Asia Pacific rents increased 2.9% y-o-y in aggregate in the 12


months to 2Q16. Sydney outperformed the region with annual net
effective rent growth of 17.1% followed by Hong Kong (+11.1%) and
Bengaluru (+10.5%). Broad based demand bolstered rent growth in
Osaka (+9.5%) and Shanghai (+7.8%).

Asia Pacific rents maintain growth trajectory


In aggregate, Asia Pacific rents grew 0.6% q-o-q, at the same rate
as in Q1. Strong tech demand and lack of available space saw
Bengaluru (+4.8%) achieve the strongest quarterly rental growth,
followed by Manila (+3.4%) where demand from offshoring and
outsourcing continued to drive rents higher. Traditional occupier
groups such as financials and professional services firms sustained
Sydney rent growth (+2.9%) while Mainland Chinese financials were
again the most active category in Hong Kong (+2.3%). Tokyo, the
largest office market in Asia Pacific, saw rent growth continue to flag
in Q2 as landlords were cautious in light of a large supply pipeline.
Restrictions on peer-to-peer lending and cost-saving strategies saw
rent growth slow in China.
Asia Pacific Office Rental Values, 2Q16
Hong Kong (Central)
Beijing (CBD)
Tokyo (CBD - 5 Kus)
Shanghai (CBD Overall)
Singapore (CBD Overall)
Seoul (CBD)
Taipei (Xinyi)
Mumbai (SBD BKC)
Ho Chi Minh City (CBD)
Guangzhou (Zhujiang New Town)
Sydney (CBD)
Auckland (CBD)
Osaka (CBD 2-kus)
Jakarta (CBD)
NCR Delhi (SBD)
Hanoi (Overall)
Wellington (CBD)
Manila (Makati CBD)
Bangkok (CBD)
Perth (CBD)
Melbourne (CBD)
Brisbane (CBD)
Canberra (CBD)
Bengaluru (SBD)
Adelaide (CBD)
Kuala Lumpur (City Centre)
Chennai (SBD)

Liquidity and low cost of capital underpin capital value growth


Capital values increased 0.8% q-o-q in aggregate in Asia Pacific in
2Q16, slower than the 1.4% increase recorded in 1Q16. Robust
investor interest and the low interest rate environment continue to
support capital value growth. Bolstered by strong increases in rents,
Bengaluru recorded the strongest capital value growth (+4.8%). Rent
growth and transaction volumes have led to solid capital value
increases in Seoul (+4.3%).
Supported by the low cost of capital in Japan, Osaka (+21.1%) once
again led the region in annual capital value growth. Liquidity in
capital markets and strong investor appetite underscored a 16.4%
y-o-y uplift in Sydney capital values. Shanghai and Bengaluru have
also recorded double digit capital value increases.

Asia Pacific Office Capital Values, 2Q16


Hong Kong (Central)
Tokyo (CBD - 5 Kus)
Singapore (CBD Overall)
Taipei (Xinyi)
Beijing (CBD)
Shanghai (CBD Overall)
Seoul (CBD)
Sydney (CBD)
Guangzhou (Zhujiang New Town)
Osaka (CBD 2-kus)
Melbourne (CBD)
Perth (CBD)
Brisbane (CBD)
Auckland (CBD)
Ho Chi Minh City (CBD)
Mumbai (SBD BKC)
Adelaide (CBD)
Jakarta (CBD)
Canberra (CBD)
Bangkok (CBD)
Wellington (CBD)
NCR Delhi (SBD)
Hanoi (Overall)
Manila (Makati CBD)
Kuala Lumpur (City Centre)
Chennai (SBD)
Bengaluru (SBD)

200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800


Net Effective Rents (USD psm pa)

Source: JLL (Real Estate Intelligence Service)

10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000


Capital Values (USD psm)

Source: JLL (Real Estate Intelligence Service)

4Q15

2Q16

2Q15

4Q14

2Q14

4Q13

2Q13

Capital Value Index

4Q12

2Q12

4Q11

2Q11

4Q10

2Q10

4Q09

2Q09

Rental Index

4Q08

2Q08

4Q07

2Q07

4Q06

190
180
170
160
150
140
130
120
110
100
2Q06

1Q06 = 100

Asia Pacific Office Rental and Capital Value Indexes,


1Q062Q16

Source: JLL (Real Estate Intelligence Service)


Note: The Indexes are stock-weighted average of rental and capital value
movements across Asia Pacific

Hong Kong (Central)


Beijing (CBD)
Tokyo (CBD - 5 Kus)
Shanghai (CBD Overall)
Singapore (CBD Overall)
Seoul (CBD)
Taipei (Xinyi)
Mumbai (SBD BKC)
Ho Chi Minh City (CBD)
Guangzhou (Zhujiang New Town)
Sydney (CBD)
Auckland (CBD)
Osaka (CBD 2-kus)
Jakarta (CBD)
NCR Delhi (SBD)
Hanoi (Overall)
Wellington (CBD)
Manila (Makati CBD)
Bangkok (CBD)
Perth (CBD)
Melbourne (CBD)
Brisbane (CBD)
Canberra (CBD)
Bengaluru (SBD)
Adelaide (CBD)
Kuala Lumpur (City Centre)
Chennai (SBD)
Source:
Notes:

Moderate rent and capital value growth to continue


The weaker activity levels in China and India, two of Asia Pacifics
largest markets, have led us to revise down our leasing volume
forecast and we now expect regional growth of 05% y-o-y in
2016. Despite the slower leasing activity in the first half of the year,
demand from several markets is likely to offset weakness elsewhere.
Broad based demand is set to sustain rent growth in Sydney, which
is expected to register the strongest annual rental growth in Asia
Pacific in 2016, with Hong Kong and Bengaluru rounding out the top
three markets. As such, we maintain our view that Asia Pacific rents
will increase 23% y-o-y in aggregate over the whole of 2016.
Recent transactions underscore the notion that investors remain
interested in Asia Pacific office markets. The low interest rate
environment, liquidity, demand for safe haven assets and funds
nearing the end of their life are all likely to sustain investment volumes
over the near term. In aggregate, we expect capital value growth to
continue to outpace rental growth through the end of the year.

2Q16 Average
Grade A Rent
(USD psm pa)

Quarterly Change
2Q16 vs 1Q16
(Local Currency)

Yearly Change
2Q16 vs 2Q15
(Local Currency)

2Q16 Average
Grade A Capital Value
(USD psm)

Quarterly Change
2Q16 vs 1Q16
(Local Currency)

Yearly Change
2Q16 vs 2Q15
(Local Currency)

1,789
1,022
885
852
669
530
489
477
459
434
401
365
347
306
288
274
251
241
216
208
207
200
174
168
148
137
127

2.3
0.5
0.4
0.9
3.3
2.0
0.9
0.5
0.6
0.5
2.9
0.6
1.6
2.8
3.7
1.7
1.1
3.4
0.6
4.7
0.0
0.6
0.3
4.8
0.5
0.7
0.0

11.1
2.4
4.1
7.8
14.1
3.8
0.5
0.1
2.1
1.7
17.1
3.0
9.5
8.2
1.4
3.5
1.0
5.9
2.2
20.1
1.9
3.5
2.6
10.5
2.0
2.7
2.9

55,090
16,089
29,997
14,840
18,208
11,674
16,300
4,915
4,940
9,377
11,231
5,621
9,141
3,926
3,234
2,944
3,235
2,623
3,245
7,172
7,312
5,850
3,738
1,631
3,996
2,015
2,002

0.5
0.5
0.4
1.2
1.7
4.3
0.9
0.7
0.6
1.0
1.1
4.4
1.6
2.8
3.7
1.7
0.7
3.7
0.2
0.8
0.1
0.0
0.1
4.8
0.4
0.7
0.0

5.4
2.4
9.4
10.9
6.9
7.6
0.5
3.0
N/A
0.7
16.4
12.9
21.1
9.3
1.3
N/A
5.1
6.0
4.5
0.1
9.4
6.1
7.2
10.5
8.7
2.4
3.1

JLL (Real Estate Intelligence Service)


All rents are net effective. Rents and capital values are on a net lettable area basis
psm pa per square metre per annum
CBD Central Business District; SBD Secondary Business District ; ZJNT Zhujiang New Town

Jones Lang LaSalle


2016 Jones Lang LaSalle IP, Inc. All rights reserved. All information contained herein is from sources deemed reliable;
however, no representation or warranty is made to the accuracy thereof.

www.jll.com

You might also like