3d Geological Modeling in A Turbidite System
3d Geological Modeling in A Turbidite System
3d Geological Modeling in A Turbidite System
Abstract
After 3 years of production, results indicated necessity to
refine the geological model of Cretaceous turbidite reservoirs
in an off-shore oil field of Campos Basin, Brazil.
A stratigraphic analysis was developed to build a new
stratigraphic-structural framework. Seismic interpretation was
used to incorporate structural data by mapping the system of
normal faults. Using concepts of sequence stratigraphy,
seismic, biostratigraphic and lithologic data were used to
define 12 major depositional sequences, spanning from
Cenomanian to Maastrichtian. In 8 of these sequences, 12
turbidite systems were recognized and 9 of them focused for
the present study. These turbidite systems compose the
operational reservoir zones. Six of them were deposited during
the Turonian and three during the Santonian. Erosive surfaces
and regional unconformities affect the distribution of the
turbidite systems. Action of erosion and faulting results in
complex framework and lateral communications among
reservoirs of different ages. Several oil-water contacts are
present and controlled by some of the faults and the lateral
communications.
Modeling this complex system included many different
techniques and softwares in steps of the work. The first step
involved a topologic three-dimensional construction, including
all of the major geologic information; relationships among the
main turbidite systems were validated by production data.
Next was creating a refined grid to populate the model with
rock-properties; corner point geometry grid was built to honor
the direction of major faults. Third was facies characterization;
vertical proportion matrix was used to represent the horizontal
non-stationary of the data and seismic amplitude was used as a
constraint. Plurigaussian simulations were used to populate the
model; this type of simulation is suitable to represent the
multiple and non-sequential contact relations among facies.
The fifth step was using Monte Carlo simulation to fulfill the
model with porosity and permeability, based on petrophysic
histograms from well data, classified by facies. Upscaling the
model was the last step in order to finally transfer the
geological data to the flow simulator.
Preliminary results from the flow simulator reveal better
fitting between this new geological model and the present
production data.
Introduction
Along the years from 2000 to 2002, a series of perforations
and workovers in this studied field indicated a partial
inadequacy of the model then existent to explain the
deviations found in relation to the expected results. A
multidisciplinary
team
(petrophysicist,
geophysicist,
sedimentologist, reservoir geologist and engineer) was
composed to perform an integrated study to update the
geological model.
An extensive revision work of all the available data and
their internal organization into a three-dimensional (3D)
model, to respect the main complexities and heterogeneities
observed in the field reservoirs, was then put in practice. Part
of the methods and results is next exposed.
Preliminary Information
The studied field is composed of 6 different blocks distributed
in an area of 728 km2 with water depths varying between 800
and 1500m. The present work deals with its main producing
block.
The main reservoirs are Upper Cretaceous (Turonian and
Santonian) turbidite sandstones, with good quality oil (28
API). A large number of stacking and partially connected
reservoirs is recognized in different turbidite systems. These
turbidites are characterized as amalgamated channel
complexes. An increasing erosive character upwards causes,
especially in Santonian reservoirs, erosive superimposed
surfaces, including some unconformities. These complex
stratigraphic sequences were later disturbed by normal faults,
during episodic salt movements.
Main flow restrictions should be related (i) to structural
subjects (complex fault system) (ii) external geometry and
internal heterogeneity of the reservoirs and (iii) the structural
relationship among the different stratigraphic units.
Stratigraphic Analysis
General Information. The stratigraphic interval approached
in the present work is represented by sedimentary sequences
that
were
deposited
from
the
Upper
Albian
Superior/Cenomanian to the Lower Tertiary. That section
represents the Marine Transgressive Megasequence (Bruhn,
1998). During this period Campos Basin was submitted to a
combination of thermal subsidence, amplified by sedimentary
load, with general trend of eustatic elevation of the sea level
(Chang et al., 1988). Except for the systems deposited during
the Cenomanian, the preponderant factor in the deposition of
those sequences would be the tectonic activity (Bruhn, 1988).
General conditions of starving basin controlled a
deposition of coarse turbidites in thick amalgamated
successions, but confined in narrow troughs formed by
halokinetic faults.
Several works approach the study of sequences (sensu
Mitchum, 1977) between the Cenomanian and the
Maastrichtian periods in Campos Basin. General concepts and
data are developed by Martins and Moreira (1994), and, more
specifically for the studied area, Becker et al. (1999).
The present study suggests the subdivision of the
Cenomanian to the Maastrichtian periods into 12 possibly 3rd
order depositional sequences (table 1), since each sequence
spans a time interval of about 1 to 4 (predominantly 2 and 3)
millions of years. These sequences were defined by their fossil
content (especially the nannofossil biostratigraphy determined
by Martins et al., 1994-2003; see table 1); in practice some
stratigraphic markers, using log-correlation, were also used to
define the sequences.
Table 1 Relation of 12 depositional sequences, determined with
the support of biostratigraphy for the studied area. Oil-bearing
reservoir zones are identified in 6 sequences.
Petrobras
Reservoir
DEPOSITIONAL SEQUENCES
nannofossil
zones
Biozones
UPPER MAASTRICHTIAN
290
--LOWER MAASTRICHTIAN
280
--CAMPANIAN-MAASTRICHTIAN
270
--CAMPANIAN
265
--LOWER CAMPANIAN
260.9
--SANTONIAN-CAMPANIANO
260.9
CRP-100
SANTONIAN
260.7
CRP-200
CONIACIAN-SANTONIAN
260.5
CRP-300
CONIACIAN
260.4
ESP-90
TURONIAN
260.3
ESP-100
ESP-200 to
TURONIANO
260.2
ESP-500
CENOMANIAN
260.1
---
SPE 95612
CARAPEBA SANDSTONES
(mainly Santonian in age)
ESPADARTE SANDSTONES
(mainly Turonian in age)
RESERVOIR ZONES
CRP-100
CRP-200
CRP-300
ESP-90
ESP-100
ESP-200
ESP-300
ESP-400
ESP-500
SPE 95612
Stratigraphic-Structural Framework
Preliminary actions. The initial step for the construction
of the framework was the stratigraphic interpretation starting
from the well log analysis, through identification and
correlation of the main stratigraphic markers. The support for
those interpretations came from data of previous studies
concerning the interpretation of sequences, biostratigraphic
zoning, reservoir zoning, structural mapping and seismic
interpretation (Martins and Moreira, 1994, Martins et al.,
1994-2003, Becker et al, 1999 and Aguiar and Destro, 2000).
The main result of this correlation was the establishment of the
depositional sequences and reservoir zones described in the
item Stratigraphic Analysis.
General illustration for the structures is present in figures 2
and 3: stacking of the sedimentary sequences is observed, as
well as the superimposed fault system. In the strike section
(Fig. 3) is possible to observe the relationships of lateral
contacts among different turbidite systems (reservoir zones of
Table 1). The main observed lateral communications are
among CRP-300 and ESP-100 zones to south of the field (left
side of Fig. 3) and CRP-100 and ESP-200 to northeast of the
field (right side of Fig. 3).
1 Km
SPE 95612
SPE 95612
(a) CRP-100
(b) CRP-200
(c) CRP-300
(d) ESP-90
(e) ESP-100
(f) ESP-200
(a)
(b)
Fig. 6 Example of problems in transferring the 3D structuralstratigraphic framework (example in CRP-200 zone): (a) topologic
model, (b) gridded model with some missing blocks. See Fig. 5b
for figure orientation and scales.
(g) ESP-300
(h) ESP-400
(i) ESP-500
SPE 95612
(a)
(b)
(a)
(b)
SPE 95612
monogaussian
contacttype
sequential contacts
plurigaussian
contacttype
non-sequential contacts
SPE 95612
(a)
In each zone, VPM, variograms and the chosen contacttype were used to perform several simulations. For this
specific study just one realization was chosen upon subjective
criterion, in agreement with the intrinsic geological knowledge
of the conceptual depositional model of the area.
Simple Monte Carlo simulations were performed for
porosity and permeability in each zone and conditioned by
facies, using histograms of the well data parameters. The final
models for facies, porosity and permeability are illustrated in
Fig. 14).
Upscaling of the fine geological model to the coarse grid
and exporting it to the dynamic flow simulator. The fine
geological model properties were upscaled to be transferred to
the dynamic simulation model. Instead of the classic
geometric upscaling we used a topologic model, where each
layer of the coarse grid is manually associated to the
corresponding layers in the fine grid. This type of vertical
association improves the pertinence of calculated values after
the scale change.
Vertically, we grouped original units (layers of the fine grid)
in units to be recognized after the scale change (Table 3). This
was done after recognizing the main heterogeneities among
layers of the fine grid, which were observed in representative
VPCs of each area (and still according the conceptual
depositional model) and, secondarily, considering the different
oil-water contacts present in these reservoirs.
(b)
(c)
Fig. 14 Longitudinal dip section representing the simulation
results for (a) facies (Plurigaussian), (b) porosity and (c)
permeability in ESP-200 zone. Porosity (phi) and permeability
(Kx) are results of facies (Lithotype) conditioned Monte-Carlo
simulations.
SPE 95612
ZONES
CRP-100
CRP-200
CRP-300
ESP-90
ESP-100
ESP-200
ESP-300
ESP-400
ESP-500
COARSE GRID
1
2
3
6
7
8
10
11
13
16
17
18
20
21
22
24
26
27
29
FINE GRID
1-5
6-15
16-48
1-8
8-15
16-56
1-9
9-48
1-10
1-12
13-18
19-20
1-20
21-40
41-50
1-25
1-13
13-25
1-20
Kx = K min K max
(Eq. 3)
(a)
(b)
(c)
Fig. 16 - Porosity in the fine grid (a), and after the upscaling (b); a
comparison between both grids is in (c).
10
SPE 95612
Concluding Remarks
With this study we have searched the extensive incorporation
of available data and a very detailed representation of the
reservoir complexities and heterogeneities observed in the
field. For that, an extensive study of the stratigraphy and
structural geology of the area was performed, as well as an
analytical use of core, log, production and seismic data.
The final result was a robust three-dimensional model of
immediate application for the dynamic flow simulator and
subsequent reservoir studies. Detailed and final compatibility
analyses of all different oil-water contacts, and of volume
estimation still were not ended for final validation of the
model. Eventual adjustments should still be necessary.
Nevertheless, first results obtained from dynamic
simulation reveals a much better production history matching,
when comparing with the previous geological model. This is
valid not only for the general matching, when considering the
field as a whole, but also when considering individual
production zones and even individual producing wells.
Bibliographic References
Acknowledgements
We thank Marcelo Blauth (consultant geologist, Reservoir
Division of the Petrobras E&P Department), for important
technical advices, suggestions and discussions during the
studies; we also thank the technical team of the Reservoir Area
of the Central Production Asset (Petrobras Campos Basin
Business Unit), for valuable discussion and previous
interpretation during the field exploitation phase. Finally we
thank Petrobras, for permission to present this paper.
6.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
7.
8.
9.