10 5923 J Jmea 20150501 05
10 5923 J Jmea 20150501 05
10 5923 J Jmea 20150501 05
DOI: 10.5923/j.jmea.20150501.05
Abstract Complex thermal stresses generated in welded structures are undesirable but inevitable in fusion welding. The
presence of residual stresses can be detrimental to the integrity of a welded joint. In this research, redistribution of residual
stress magnitude and profile was studied and compared in two multi-pass welded structural alloys (API X100 and 304L
stainless steel) after cold rolling and laser processing. The residual stress field was studied by neutron diffraction using the
SALSA strain scanner at their reactor neutron source at ILL, Grenoble. In addition to a complex distribution of residual
stress state, multi-pass welds also forms dendritic grain structure, which are repeatedly heated, resulting in segregation of
alloying elements. Dendritic grain structure is weaker and segregation of alloying elements may result in formation of
corrosion microcells as well as reduction in overall corrosion prevention due to depletion of alloying elements in certain
areas. The modification of as-welded residual stress state was done by cold rolling which was followed by laser processing
to create a recrystallized microstructure to minimise segregation. The main objective of this study is to understand the
suitability of this novel manufacturing technique to create a stress free weldment with recrystallised grain structure.
Hardness evolution in the welded structures was scanned following welding, post weld cold rolling and cold rolling
followed by laser processing. Hardness distribution in both the structural alloys showed a significant evidence of plastic
deformation near the cap pass of the weld metal. Residual stress redistribution was observed up to 4 mm from the capping
pass for ferritic steel, while in austenitic steel weld, post weld cold rolling was effective in modifying the residual stress
redistribution throughout the entire thickness. Laser processing in both cases reinstated the as-welded residual stress
distribution and resulted in softening of the strained area.
Keywords Ferritic and austenitic structural steel, Residual stress, Multi-pass welds, Neutron diffraction, Rolling, Laser
processing
1. Introduction
Multi-pass fusion welding by a filler welding electrode is
normally carried out to join thick steel sections used in most
engineering applications. Welded joints in any installation,
is an area of critical importance, since they are likely to
contain a higher density of defects than the parent metal and
their physical properties can differ significantly from the
parent metal. The arc fusion welding relies on intense local
heating at a joint where a certain amount of the base metal
is melted and fused with additional metal from the filler
wire. Intense local heating causes severe thermal gradients
in a welded component and the uneven cooling that follows
* Corresponding author:
[email protected] (Jibrin Sule)
Published online at http://journal.sapub.org/jmea
Copyright 2015 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved
Jibrin Sule et al.: Comparative Study of Evolution of Residual Stress State by Local Mechanical
Tensioning and Laser Processing of Ferritic and Austenitic Structural Steel Welds
34
2. Experimental Procedures
2.1. Materials
2.1.1. API X100 Steel Plates
This material was machined to the dimension of 300
150 20 mm3 and a narrow groove edge preparation of 5
angle with backing bar was made as shown in Figure 1. The
filler wire used was Union MoNi (1.0 mm diameter), while
the shielding gas was 92% Ar and 8% O2 at flow rate of 30
lit.min-1. Chemical compositions of the API X100 steel
plates and the filler wire are shown in Table 1 and Table 2
respectively.
2.1.2. 304L Stainless Steel Plate
The second material was also machined to the dimension
of 300 x 150 x 12 mm3. The welding preparation is as
shown in Figure 1. The filler wire used was Lincoln MIG
308L Si of 1.0 mm nominal diameter. Table 3 shows the
chemical compositions of the 304L stainless steel plate.
Table 4 shows the chemical compositions of the filler wire.
The shielding gas used was 98% Ar and 2% O2 at flow rate
of 30 lit.min-1.
Si
Mn
Mo
Ni
Al
Cu
Nb
Ti
Cr
0.06
0.25
1.79
0.016
0.16
0.13
0.03
<0.0005
0.27
0.03
0.01
0.04
0.03
<0.003
Table 2. Composition (wt. %) of the filler wire used for API X100 steel
C
Si
Mn
Mo
Ni
Cu
Cr
Others
0.12
0.4 -0.8
1.3 - 1.9
0.015
0.25 - 0.65
0.8 -1.3
0.3
0.15
0.018
0.25
35
Si
Mn
Cr
Mo
Ni
Al
Cu
Nb
Ti
0.021
0.36
1.48
18.2
0.022
0.15
8.10
< 0.01
< 0.005
0.19
0.01
< 0.01
Table 4. Composition (wt. %) of the filler wire used for 304L stainless steel plate
C
Si
Mn
Cr
Mo
Ni
0.01
0.75
1.6
20
0.015
0.20
10
2.2.1. Welding
Tandem GMAW DC positive welding process was used for both the alloys. Figure 3 shows the welding torch used. The
contact tips were fed by two independent power sources and two independent wire feeding units. A number of researches
on this welding process has been reported and can be found in [25-26]. The welding parameters are shown in Table 5 and
Table 6 for API X100 steel plates and 304L stainless steel plates respectively.
Jibrin Sule et al.: Comparative Study of Evolution of Residual Stress State by Local Mechanical
Tensioning and Laser Processing of Ferritic and Austenitic Structural Steel Welds
36
Table 5. Welding parameters on narrow groove welds of API X100 steel plate
Lead
Passes
Travel speed
(m.min-1)
Root
pass
Trail
Oscillation
CTWD
(mm)
WFS
(m.min-1)
Current
(A)
Volts.
(V)
WFS
(m.min-1)
Current
(A)
Volts.
(V)
Freq.
(Hz)
Osc.
width
0.9
11
191.3
20.9
11
178.2
22.1
350
90
14
Fill 1
0.9
12
193.9
20.8
12
170.7
22.7
350
135
14
Fill 2
0.9
13
199.3
21.9
13
182.3
21.7
350
190
14
Fill 3
0.9
14
206.6
22.9
14
195.9
21.3
350
225
14
Fill 4
0.9
15
221.7
22.9
15
184.4
23.1
350
270
14
Cap pass
0.7
13
215.0
21.5
13
178.7
20.9
350
400
14
Table 6. Welding parameters on narrow groove welds of 304L stainless steel plate
Passes
Travel speed
(m.min-1)
Root
pass
Lead
Trail
Oscillation
CTWD
(mm)
WFS
(m.min-1)
Current
(A)
Volts.
(V)
WFS
(m.min-1)
Current
(A)
Volts.
(V)
Freq.
(Hz)
Osc.
width
0.9
11
218.9
21.1
11
21.0
22.1
350
90
14
Fill 1
0.9
12
232.2
21.9
12
230.3
22.3
350
135
14
Cap pass
0.7
10
222.5
23.5
10
219.8
23.9
350
400
14
37
Figure 6.
Jibrin Sule et al.: Comparative Study of Evolution of Residual Stress State by Local Mechanical
Tensioning and Laser Processing of Ferritic and Austenitic Structural Steel Welds
38
(1)
(2)
{ ii } =
ii +
(1 + )
(1 2 )
( 11 + 22 + 33 )
(3)
3.2. Hardness
Hardness scan was performed from the reinforcement
bead (cap pass) to the root pass of API X100 steel as shown
in Figure 9. In the API X100 steel, the effect of cold
working was observed up to about 8 mm below the weld
cap. Up to about 4 mm the effect is more pronounced after
that from 4-8 mm the effect is less pronounced. The
as-welded plate shows an increase in hardness value from
the cap to the root pass of the weld metal, which suggests
thermal straining by successive passes. Hardness scan
performed from the cap pass to the root pass of 304L
stainless steel is shown in Figure 10. The effect of cold
working was observed throughout the entire thickness of the
material. Just like the API X100 steel, up to about 4 mm
below the cap, the effect is very significant. The effect cold
working observed throughout the entire thickness of 304L
stainless steel could be attributed to the closely packed
crystal structure and large number of active slip systems in
the FCC alloy.
Post weld cold rolling followed by laser processing of the
API X100 steel resulted in softening of the weld metal up to
about 7 mm below weld surface but as hardening, the
softening is also more pronounced up to 4 mm (396HV to
300HV). However, post weld cold rolled followed by laser
processing of the 304L stainless steel resulted in lesser
decrease in the hardness value (300HV to 280HV) of the
weld metal. This indicates that the thermal energy applied
was not sufficient to supply enough energy for complete
recrystallization. The minor scattering in hardness could be
due to microstructural variation from re-heating by
subsequent passes.
Figure 9. Hardness profile of X100 pipeline steel along the weld metal of
the three conditions
Figure 10. Hardness profile of 304L austenitic steel along the weld metal
of the three conditions
39
Figure 12. Residual stress profile across the weld in sample with different
processing conditions of 304L stainless steel at 2 mm below the top surface
Figure 11. Residual stress profile across the weld in sample with different
processing conditions of API X100 steel at 2 mm below the top surface
40
Jibrin Sule et al.: Comparative Study of Evolution of Residual Stress State by Local Mechanical
Tensioning and Laser Processing of Ferritic and Austenitic Structural Steel Welds
4. Conclusions
Comparative study of evolution of residual stress state by
local mechanical tensioning and laser processing of ferritic
(API X100 steel) and austenitic (304L stainless steel)
structural steel welds has been investigated. From this
experiment, it can be concluded that;
Post weld cold rolling was effective in modifying the
residual stress state up to 4 mm below the weld surface of
the API X100 steel. Whereas, in 304L stainless steel, the
effect of post weld cold rolling was effective in modifying
the residual stress state throughout the entire thickness. This
difference in these two alloys could be due to the fact that
the larger number of slip systems available in the FCC
structure (304L stainless steel) make it easier to deform the
alloy plastically through the thickness which enables
reduction of tensile residual stress state.
As the modification of stress state is achieved by
localised plastic deformation, an increase in hardness of the
weld metal was observed in both alloys.
The post weld cold rolling followed by laser processing
at the cap pass of the two alloys, resulted in reinstated
as-welded residual stress state profile. Following this
observation, future processing route was identified which is
presently under investigation. This new route involves cold
[9]
41
[10] Turski, M., Francis, J. A., Hurrell, P. R., Bate, S. K., Hiller, S.
and Withers, P. J. (2012), "Effects of stop-start features on
residual stresses in a multipass austenitic stainless steel weld",
International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, vol. 89,
pp. 9-18.
[11] Ainsworth, R. A. (2006), "R5 procedures for assessing
structural integrity of components under creep and
creep-fatigue conditions", International Materials Reviews,
vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 107-126.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
42
Jibrin Sule et al.: Comparative Study of Evolution of Residual Stress State by Local Mechanical
Tensioning and Laser Processing of Ferritic and Austenitic Structural Steel Welds