22 1-S2.0-S0924857908002392-Main
22 1-S2.0-S0924857908002392-Main
22 1-S2.0-S0924857908002392-Main
461
Table 1
Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antimicrobial agents for VIM-1 metallo--lactamase-producing Citrobacter freundii C184/07, its transconjugant strain and
Escherichia coli 26R793
Antibiotic
Imipenem
Meropenem
Ertapenem
Aztreonam
Ampicillin
Amoxicillin/clavulanic acida
Piperacillin/tazobactamb
Ceftazidime
Cefotaxime
Cefuroxime
Ciprooxacin
Netilmicin
a
b
Transconjugant strain
E. coli 26R793
4
0.5
1
1
>256
>256
>256
>256
>256
>256
1
12
2
0.25
0.125
0.5
>256
>256
>256
>256
64
>256
0.5
16
0.25
0.016
0.094
0.125
4
4
0.75
0.25
0.094
2
0.047
1.5
References
[1] Queenan AM, Bush K. Carbapenemases: the versatile beta-lactamases. Clin
Microbiol Rev 2007;20:44058.
[2] Aschbacher R, Doumith M, Livermore DM, Larcher C, Woodford N. Linkage
of acquired quinolone resistance (qnrS1) and metallo--lactamase (blaVIM1 )
genes in multiple species of Enterobacteriaceae from Bolzano Italy. J Antimicrob
Chemother 2008;61:51523.
[3] Weile J, Rahmig H, Gfrer S, Schroeppel K, Knabbe C, Susa M. First detection of
a VIM-1 metallo-beta-lactamase in a carbapenem-resistant Citrobacter freundii
clinical isolate in an acute hospital in Germany. Scand J Infect Dis 2007;39:2646.
[4] Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Seventeenth informational supplement. M100-S17.
Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2007.
[5] Yan JJ, Hsueh PR, Ko WC, Luh KT, Tsai SH, Wu HM, et al. Metallo-beta-lactamases
in clinical Pseudomonas isolates in Taiwan and identication of VIM-3, a novel
variant of the VIM-2 enzyme. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2001;45:22248.
[6] Doran TI. The role of Citrobacter in clinical disease of children: review. Clin Infect
Dis 1999;28:38494.
[7] Mainardi JL, Mugnier P, Coutrot A, Buu-Ho A, Collatz E, Gutmann L. Carbapenem resistance in a clinical isolate of Citrobacter freundii. Antimicrob Agents
Chemother 1997;41:23524.
Efthimia Protonotariou
Maria Tsalidou
Danai Vitti
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Hippokration General Hospital,
Konstantinoupoleos 49, Thessaloniki, Greece
Athanasios Kalogeridis
Department of Hematology, Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Second
Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration General Hospital,
Thessaloniki, Greece
Danae Soanou
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Hippokration General Hospital,
Konstantinoupoleos 49, Thessaloniki, Greece
Corresponding
doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.05.008
462
Table 1
Pathogens cultured, sensitivity pattern and treatment
Patient no.
Course no.
Pathogen 1
Sensitive toa
Pathogen 2
Sensitive toa
1
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
6
7
7
7
7
7
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
P. aeruginosa (NM)
P. aeruginosa (NM)
P. aeruginosa (NM)
P. aeruginosa (NM)
P. aeruginosa (NM)
P. aeruginosa (NM)
P. aeruginosa (NM)
P. aeruginosa (NM)
P. aeruginosa (NM)
P. aeruginosa (NM)
P. aeruginosa (NM)
P. aeruginosa (NM)
P. aeruginosa (NM)
P. aeruginosa (NM)
P. aeruginosa (NM)
P. aeruginosa (NM)
P. aeruginosa (NM)
P. aeruginosa (NM)
P. aeruginosa (NM)
P. aeruginosa (NM)
P. aeruginosa (NM)
P. aeruginosa (NM)
P. aeruginosa (M)
P. aeruginosa (NM)
P. aeruginosa (NM)
P. aeruginosa (NM)
Ta
Co/To
Co/Ci/Im
Ta/Co/Ge
Co/Ci/Ce
Ta/To/Co
Ta/To/Co
Ta/To/Co
Ta/To/Co
Ta/Co
Ta/Co/Ci
Ta/Co
Ta/To/Co
Ta/To/Co
Ta/To/Co
To/Ge/Im
Ta/Co
Ta/Co
Ta/Co
Ta/To/Ce
Ta
Co
Ta/Co
Ta/Co
Ce/Im/Ci
Ta/To/Co
P. aeruginosa (M)
P. aeruginosa (M)
P. aeruginosa (M)
MRSA
Ta/Ge/Ci
Ta/To/Co
Ta/To/Im
Va/Li
P. aeruginosa (M)
P. aeruginosa (M)
P. aeruginosa (M)
To/Ce/Ci
Ce/Ci/Im
P. aeruginosa (M)
P. aeruginosa (M)
P. aeruginosa (M)
Ce/Ci/Im
Ce/Ci/Im
Ta/To/Co
Ta/To
Co
To
To
To
Ta/To
Ta/To
Ta/To
Ta/To
To
Ta
Ta/To
Ta/To
Ta/To
To
To
Co
Co
To
To
To
To
Ci
To
To
M, mucoid strain; NM, non-mucoid strain; MRSA, meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Ce, ceftazidime; Ci, ciprooxacin; Co, colistin; Ge, gentamicin; Im, imipenem;
Li, linezolid; Ta, piperacillin/tazobactam; To, tobramycin; Va, vancomycin.
a
The Pseudomonas strain was resistant to all other antibiotics not documented as being sensitive to.
S. Faruqi
J. McCreanor
T. Moon
Department of Academic Respiratory Medicine,
Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham HU16 5JQ, UK
R. Meigh
Department of Microbiology, Castle Hill Hospital,
Cottingham HU16 5JQ, UK
A.H. Morice
Department of Academic Respiratory Medicine,
Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham HU16 5JQ, UK
Corresponding
doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.05.010
463
Laboratories, Combourg, France) on bile aesculin azide agar (BioRad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France) medium supplemented with
6 mg/L vancomycin (Sigma, St. Quentin Fallavier, France). Cultures on medium without vancomycin were also performed to
compare titres of total and resistant Enterococcus populations.
Colonies detected on vancomycin plates and their vancomycin
resistance genes were identied by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) according to Depardieu et al. [3]. The sensitivity
of isolates was analysed by the microbroth dilution method
[4].
In total, 193 chicken samples were obtained; 112 resulted in
colonies on vancomycin media. However, after PCR analysis only
three isolates (1.6%) were shown to contain the vanA gene, two of
which were E. faecium (one isolated from an export broiler and the
other from free-range production). The latter strain was isolated
without enrichment.
Of 113 tested pig samples, 71 resulted in colonies on vancomycin
media. Seven samples (6.2%) contained vanA-positive Enterococcus spp. Four were E. faecium and one was Enterococcus faecalis.
Three were not specied as E. faecalis, E. faecium, Enterococcus
gallinarum or Enterococcus casseliavus by PCR but were identied by biochemical tests as Enterococcus sp. Positive samples
were detected from ve different slaughterhouses from different
geographical origins. For the ve samples in which vancomycinresistant colonies could be detected without enrichment, the
proportion of resistant enterococci/total enterococci was 1/500
to <1/15 000.
The sensitivity of the isolates is shown in Table 1. All strains
were resistant to vancomycin (minimum inhibitory concentration
(MIC) = 32 mg/L for the E. faecalis isolate and MIC > 128 mg/L for
the others) and to tetracycline. Most isolates were resistant to
erythromycin, but none of them were resistant to ampicillin or
gentamicin. It is also noteworthy that none of the isolates were
resistant to avilamycin, in contrast to most of the vancomycinresistant strains isolated in 1999 [4]. Avilamycin is a food additive
that was ofcially banned in 2006, but animal producers may have
opted for a voluntary ban before this date.
In conclusion, this study enabled detection of several vanAcontaining isolates in broiler and pig digestive ora 7 years
after the avoparcin ban. No vanB-containing enterococci were
detected. The prevalence was higher in pig production (P < 0.05).
The antimicrobial resistance proles of the isolates were rather
different from those observed in recently isolated strains from
human cases, as the human strains were usually resistant to ampicillin and frequently high-level resistant to gentamicin [2]. Finally,
these observations regarding the prevalence of animals harbouring
vancomycin-resistant strains are supported by the fact that during
annual monitoring of the sensitivity of E. faecium strains isolated
on non-selective media, no vancomycin-resistant strain was isolated from broilers in 2005 or 2006, but one and four resistant
strains were detected in swine in 2005 and 2006, respectively (A.
Perrin-Guyomard personal observation), gures that are still signicantly much lower than the percentages observed just after the
ban [1] and suggesting a marked decrease in the animal vancomycin
resistance gene reservoir after the ban. In contrast, the prevalence
of vanA-positive enterococci in humans did not change much as
shown by the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (EARSS) surveillance network data [5], which suggests that
the avoparcin ban has had little inuence on vancomycin resistance in enterococci of human origin. Actually, it appears that
most hospital vancomycin-resistant enterococci belong to a subpopulation of hospital-adapted, epidemic strain types identied
by multilocus sequence typing (MLST) the so-called clonal complex CC-17 distinct from animal strain types [6]. Although we
did not determine the MLST type of our animal isolates, hypo-