0% found this document useful (0 votes)
50 views15 pages

Week 3 Tutorial

wk 3 t

Uploaded by

Kelvin Yuen
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
50 views15 pages

Week 3 Tutorial

wk 3 t

Uploaded by

Kelvin Yuen
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15

Searching the literature and referencing

Scopus

Search term Boarding Aircraft

Web of Science

Some indexing/abstracting tools

BIOSIS
Compendex
Current Contents
Engineering Index
MEDLINE
International Civil Engineering
Abstracts
Engineering Index
Environmental Sciences & Pollution
Management
Health and Safety Science
Abstracts
PsycINFO

Psychological Abstracts
PsycLIT CD-ROM
Psychology Abstracts
RePEc (Research Papers in Economics
Risk Abstracts
Safety Science & Risk Abstracts
TRID, the TRIS and ITRD Database
CSA Civil Engineering Abstracts
CSA Mechanical & Transportation
Engineering Abstracts
Scopus

Web-based searching
Wealth of information available, but ......
Potential for issues of

Accuracy
Authority
Currency
Objectivity
Coverage

Universities ban use of some sites/resources (eg.,


Wikipedia)
Avoid using them and concentrate on academic
resources

Web-based literature searches


Finding trustworthy sources on the net
Suggested criteria:
Scope covered: breadth, depth, time, format
Content: validity, accuracy, authority, currency, uniqueness,
links with other resources, quality of writing
Graphic design
Purpose, audience
Reviews
Workability: user friendliness, computer needs, searching,
browsability, interactivity, connectivity
Cost
From: Smith, A. (1997). Criteria for evaluating internet information resources. The Public-Access
Computer Systems Review 8, 5-23.

Referencing
Is the practice of acknowledging in a written
work the intellectual work of others (Neville,
2012)

Important considerations:
Consistency
Consistency
Consistency
References Vs Bibliography
Avoiding plagarism

A research problem
What is the best method for boarding passengers on
an aircraft?

Mythbusters experiment examining different


approaches to boarding passengers

AIRCRAFT BOARDING STRATEGIES


Back to Front

Random with Seats

Front
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1

4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1

4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1

Random no seats

Front

4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1

4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1

4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1

Front

1A

2A

3A

4A

5A

6A

7A

8A

9A

10A B

11A B

12A B

13A B

14A B

15A B

16A B

17A B

WILMA Straight

WILMA Block

Reverse Pyramid

Front

Front

Front
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

5
5
5
5
5
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1

6
6
6
6
6
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2

6
6
6
6
6
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2

6
6
6
6
6
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2

6
6
6
6
6
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2

5
5
5
5
5
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1

3
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

3
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

Measures
Total boarding time (minutes)
Passenger satisfaction (3 point rating scale):
That was terrible = -1
That was OK = 0
That was great = +1

Some relevant references


Van den Briel, MHL. Villabos, JR. Hogg, GL. et. al,
(2005). America west airlines develops efficient
boarding strategies. Interfaces, 35, 191-201.
Milne, JR. Kelly, AR. (2014). A new method for
boarding passengers onto an airplane. Journal of Air
Transport Management, 34, 93-100.
Steffen, JH. Hotchkiss, J. (2012). Experimental test of
airplane boarding methods. Journal of Air Transport
Management, 18, 64-67.

You might also like