A CFD Based Numerical Analysis of Scramjet Combustor

Published by :
http://www.ijert.org
International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)

ISSN: 2278-0181
Vol. 5 Issue 12, December-2016
A CFD based Numerical Analysis of Scramjet

Combustor
A Sankaran
Department of Aeronautical Engineering
Hindusthan Institute of Technology
Coimbatore, India.
Dr. K Sundararaj
Sri Ramakrishna Engineering College
Coimbatore, India.
M Moses Devaprasanna, N Maheswaran

Hindusthan Institute of Technology
Coimbatore, India.
Abstract A CFD based modeling of flow phenomena in a
modified DLR scramjet combustor has been performed. To
enhance the air fuel mixing and to increase the combustion
efficiency at the expense of low stagnation pressure drop,
internal passages are provided in the wedge shaped strut fuel
injector. Two-dimensional RANS equations are solved
considering the flow to be steady, compressible, turbulent and
reacting. A single step reaction is considered for hydrogenoxygen reaction. A combination of eddy dissipation and finite
rate chemistry models are used. The effects of divergence angle
on the pressure drop and the combustion efficiency have been
reported. A strut with internal passage shows higher combustion
efficiency with less pressure drop than that without passages.
KeywordsHypersonic
propulsion;
Scramjet
engine;
Supersonic Combustion; Streamwise injection; Reacting flow;
Combustion efficiency
I.
INTRODUCTION
The desire for hypersonic flight necessitated the
supersonic combustion ramjet (Scramjet) engine potentially
expanding the speed envelope to the range of Mach 15. The
term hypersonic refers to speeds exceeding Mach 5, that is,
1520 m/s at a typical operational altitude of 32.5 km. It is
efficient to decelerate the air entering the engines of aircrafts
cruising at flight Mach number equal to 4 or 5 to subsonic
velocity before entering the combustion chamber. For
hypersonic flights such deceleration becomes more difficult
and costlier in terms of total pressure losses and it is necessary
to make provision for the combustion chamber to burn its fuel
in the supersonic airstream.
Design of combustors for scramjet engines is critical since
the combustion must take place at supersonic speeds in such a
way that enough heat is added to generate the required thrust.
Too much heat addition will result in a normal shock standing
at the combustor entrance. This is known as an inlet
interaction. On the other hand, if too little heat is released the
combustion cannot be sustained. The total residence time of
the flow is of the order of 1-2 milliseconds. Within this short
time the fuel should be mixed and burnt in the combustor and
this requires highly efficient mixing strategies and effective
flame stabilization methods.
In Scramjet combustor, the flow velocity of the main
stream is high. Therefore the injected fuel (regardless of the
direction of injection) tends to get blown downstream and
does not travel any appreciable distance in the lateral or the
IJERTV5IS120001
vertical direction at all. In other words, it does not mix with

the air. Mixing can be improved by cross-flow. However, any
aggressive mixing strategy can lead to the formation of a
normal shock at entry to the combustor, which is undesirable.
For the same reason, mechanical flame stabilizer (such as Vgutters) cannot be used in the supersonic cross-flow
.Therefore flame stabilization has to be achieved through
aerodynamic feature in the combustor design. Realization of a
working scramjet engine continues to be a challenge in the
face of such conflicting and difficult requirements.
II.
LITERATURE SURVEY
Reddy et al. carried out a two dimensional numerical

investigation on DLR scramjet combustor with single strut
for different divergent angles and its shock waves and the
combustion efficiencies were reported. The scale effects and
the effects of multi strut fuel injection on combustion
characteristics were studied. Potturi, Edwards performed
LES/RANS simulation of a supersonic combustion for
reacting and non reacting flow in DLR scramjet combustor
and reported that RANS model show better results for non
reacting flow and LES/RANS for reacting flow. Aguilera et
al. conducted an experiment in a Mach 2.1 wind tunnel
simulating a scramjet internal flow path. A fin-guided fuel
injection approach was used to optimize a trade-off between
mixing enhancement and pressure loss. Numerical study of
the effects of transverse jet injection into a supersonic
turbulent flow in a scramjet combustor was done by Rana et
al. they found that Kelvin-Helmholtz-type instabilities in the
upper jet shear layer are primarily responsible for the mixing
of the two fluids. Waidmann et al. reported the experimental
results of scramjet combustion with hydrogen fuel in a simple
geometry. It is one of the pioneering experimental results
carried oud at the Institute for Chemical Propulsion of the
German Aerospace Center, DLR.
Ganapathisubramani et al. studied the effects of upstream
boundary layers on the unsteadiness of shock-induced
separation. Experimental investigation of the phenomena of
shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions and shock
induced separation was done by Dussage et al. Large eddy
simulation was performed on a supersonic flow in a DLR
scramjet combustor and reported by Berglund and Fureby.
They have performed simulations for non-reacting and
reacting flow fields in scramjet combustors.
www.ijert.org
(This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.)
Published by :

ISSN: 2278-0181
In this paper, a CFD based investigation of the flow field

in the modified DLR scramjet combustor with a strut fuel
injector having internal passages for flow of air is carried out.
The effect of divergence angle on the top wall of the
combustor is reported. The effect of above said modifications
on the combustion efficiency and stagnation pressure drop are
presented.
III. DETAILS OF DLR SCRAMJET COMBUSTOR
The scramjet combustor used by Waidmann et al. at the
institute for Chemical Propulsion of the German Aerospace
Center, DLR is shown schematically in Fig. 1. The preheated
air is expanded through a C-D nozzle. From the nozzle, air
IV.
COMPUTATIONAL METHODOLOGY
The flow in the scramjet combustor is considered to be

steady, compressible, turbulent reacting flow. Two
dimensional Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes equations are
used. Turbulence is modeled with the standard k- model. Air
is considered as an ideal gas with variable properties.
Sutherlands law is used to calculate the viscosity.
Convection-diffusion equation is used to calculate the mass
fraction of each species. Piecewise polynomials are used to
calculate the temperature dependent specific heat. The
combination of finite rate chemistry and eddy dissipation
models are used to model the combustion. A single step
reaction is considered for hydrogen-oxygen reaction. 2H2 +
O2
2H2O
Three different grids are generated. Coarse grid with
40000 elements, medium grid with 60000 elements and fine
grid with
Fig. 2. Grid structure for the flow domain

Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of DLR scramjet combustor
enters the combustor at M = 2. The width of the combustor is

40 mm. The height is 50 mm at the inlet and 62 mm at the
exit. On the top wall of the combustor, a divergence angle of
3 is provided at a certain distance from the inlet. At the midplane of the combustor, at a distance of 77 mm from the inlet,
a wedge shaped strut is placed. The half-wedge angle is 6 and
the length is 32 mm. the strut has 15 circular injectors of each
1 mm diameter. Hydrogen is injected parallel to the air stream
through these injectors. The inlet conditions of air stream and
hydrogen are taken from Waidmann et al. and are shown in
Table 1.
Table 1. Inlet conditions of Air stream and Hydrogen
Parameters
Air
Mach number
730
1200
Static temperature (K)
340
250
Density (kg/m3)
1.002
0.097
O2 mass fraction
0.232
H2O mass fraction
0.032
N2 mass fraction
0.736
Kinetic energy (m /s )
10
2400
Eddy dissipation (m2/s3)
650
1e8
H2 mass fraction
2
Validation of computational results

The closeness of the computational results is tested with
the experimental results of Waidmann et al. Static pressure
along the centre line and bottom wall are shown in Fig. 3 and
Fig. 4 respectively. The CFD results are in good agreement
with the experimental results.
Hydrogen
Axial velocity (m/s)
Static Pressure (bar)
80000 elements. Fine grids are used in the vicinity of fuel

injector and also in the region close to the top and bottom
walls of the combustor. The mass fraction of hydrogen is
predicted along centre line of the combustor starting from the
fuel injector for different grid sizes. The grid independency is
achieved with medium grid.
Fig. 3. Static pressure along the centre line
V.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Flow field in the scramjet combustor is reported for

chemically reacting flow. Modifications are made for the strut
injector. Internal passages are provided for the air flow with
the projections at base of the strut to induce for circulation
near injector for mixing enhancement.
IJERTV5IS120001
www.ijert.org
Published by :

ISSN: 2278-0181
Fig. 4 Static pressure along the bottom wall
A. Modified strut fuel injector

The modified strut fuel injector with internal passages is
shown in Fig. 5. Combustion efficiency is defined as the
measurement of how well the fuel burnt is being utilized in the
combustion process.
Fig. 6 Combustion efficiency along the combustor for different divergence

angle and for the modified strut
Fig. 5 Strut fuel injector with internal passages
The combustion efficiencies are calculated using the

expression,
c 1
where
uYH 2 dA
mH 2inj
mH 2 x
mH 2inj
mH 2 x = mass flow rate of hydrogen at a given
section and
mH 2inj = mass flow rate of fuel injected. The
combustion efficiency is plotted along the combustor as

shown in Fig. 6.
The average stagnation pressure is calculated using the
expression,
p udA
p0 avg 0
udA
p0 = stagnation pressure, = density,

where
u = stream wise velocity. The average stagnation pressures
along the combustor for different divergence angle are shown
in Fig. 7. The stagnation pressure drop is large when
divergence angle is zero degree. It is due to the fact that the
oblique shock waves emanating from the leading edge of the
strut and reflected waves joined together to form a shock wave
system which are stronger to cause more pressure drop.
Divergence angle on the top wall of the combustor allows for
sufficient expansion of flow to take place. Therefore, the
pressure drop between inlet and exit of the combustor is less
with 3 divergence angle.
IJERTV5IS120001
Fig. 7 Average stagnation pressure along the combustor for different

divergence angle
At a section of combustor 150 mm downstream of the

injector, the combustion efficiency is high for zero degree
divergence. When comparing 1.5 and 3 divergence, the
combustion efficiency for 3 exceeds that for 1.5. With zero
degree divergence formation of stronger shock wave system
decelerates the flow, allowing more residence time for
hydrogen air mixture, giving high combustion efficiency but
at expense of more stagnation pressure drop. Therefore,
combustor with 3 divergence gives optimum combustion
efficiency with less stagnation pressure drop.
The modified strut with internal passages gives better
combustion efficiency. The projections provided at the base of
the strut create a recirculation region which helps to enhance
the mixing of hydrogen and air. Multiple internal passages in
the strut issue jet of air onto the recirculation region
augmenting the mixing process.
VI. CONCLUSION
The flow field in the modified DLR scramjet combustor is
investigated and reported in this paper. Present computational
study predicted the shock wave pattern and flow circulations
in the flow field. The divergence angle allows for expansion
of flow, without which the flow incurs more loss in terms of
stagnation pressure. Strut with internal passages enhances the
hydrogen air mixing, increases the residence time and hence
the combustion efficiency.
www.ijert.org
Published by :

ISSN: 2278-0181
REFERENCES
P. Nithish Reddy and K.Venkatasubbaiah (2014). Numerical
investigation on development of scramjet combustor Journal
of Aerospace Engineering, 04014120-18.
[2] Amarnath S Potturi and Jack R Edawards LES/RANS
simulation of a
supersonic combustion (AIAA).
[3] Aguilera, B. Pang, A. Ghosh, A. Winkelmann, A.K. Gupta,
K.H.Yu Supersonic Mixing Enhancement and Optimization
Using Fin-Guided Fuel Injection (AIAA) 2010-1526.
[4] Rana, Z. A., Thomber, B., and Drikakis, D.(2011). Trnasverse
jet injection into a supersonic turbulent cross-flow. Phys.
Fluids, 23(4), 046103.
[1]
IJERTV5IS120001
Waidmann, W., Alff, F., Bohm, M., Brummund, U., Clauss,

W., and Oschwald, M. (1994). Experimental investigation of
hydrogen combustion process in a supersonic combustion
ramjet, DGLR Jahrestagung, Erlangen, Germany, 629-638.
[6] Ganapathisubramani, B., Clemens, N. T., and Dolling, D. S.
(2007). Effect of upstream boundary layer on shock-induced
separation. J. Fluis Mech., 585, 369-394.
[7] Dussage, J. P., Dupont, P., and Debieve, J. F. (2006).
Unsteadiness in shock wave boundary layer interactions with
separation. Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 10(2), 85-91. Berglund, M.,
and Fureby, C. (2007). LES of supersonic combustion in a
scramjet engine model. Proc. Combust. Inst., 31, 2497-2504.
[5]
www.ijert.org

A CFD Based Numerical Analysis of Scramjet Combustor

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

A CFD Based Numerical Analysis of Scramjet Combustor

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

A CFD Based Numerical Analysis of Scramjet Combustor

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Published by :

International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)