Auctions: Auction Types

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

Auctions

An auction is a mechanism for trading items


by means of bidding.
Dates back to 500 BC where Babylonians
auctioned off women as wives.
Position of Emperor of Rome was auctioned
off in 193 ad
Can have the bidders trying to buy an item:
Christies, ebay, snapnames.
Can have the bidders trying to sell an item :
Procurement, priceline.com
Spectrum auctions

Auction types
All Pay Auction: Everyone writes down a
bid in secret. The person with the highest
bid wins. Everyone pays.

Rules to Auctions
First-Price Sealed-Bid Auction: Everyone writes
down a bid in secret. The person with the highest
bid wins the object and pays what he bids.
Second-Price Sealed-Bid (Vickrey) Auction:
Everyone writes down a bid in secret. The person
with the highest bid wins the object and pays the
second highest bid. (used for stamps and by
Goethe)
English Auction: The auctioneer starts at a
reserve price and increases the price until only one
bidder is left.
Dutch Auction (Not Demonstrated): The
auctioneer starts at a high price and decreases the
price until a bidder accepts the price.

Two types of Settings: Common and


Private
Examples of Common Value Auctions:
Spectrum.
Oil Drilling
Book Example.

Examples of Private Value Auctions:


Consumption items.
Memorabilia

Private Value Auctions:


Example:
I am auctioning off the right shoe of the star of
the Exeter City Football team.
Al has value 30. Bob has value 40. Chris
has value 55.

Uniformly distributed values.


Values are drawn from 0 to 10 with an
equal chance of each amount (like in the
lab). N is the number of bidders.

What is revenue in the following situations?

2nd-price sealed bid.


1st price sealed bid. Each bids 2/3 of his value.
English, Each bids up to his value
Dutch, each bids 2/3 of his value.

Private values: Equilibrium Bid


Functions

The English: stay in the auction until either

10

you win
or the bid goes higher than your value.
If not one either makes one lose when it is
worthwhile to win or win when it is worthwhile to
lose.

2nd Price

Bid
6

1st-price
4
2

All-Pay
2

10

Value

Strategies with Private Values:


2nd Price Auctions
2nd price similar logic to English auction.
It is optimal to bid ones value.
Ones bid does not affect the price one pays only
whether or not one pays.
Raising ones bid will cause one to win when it is
not worthwhile.
Lowering ones bid will cause one to lose when it
was worthwhile to win.

All-pay auction
May seem like a strange auction to run/study
but
It is used in charity auctions and from the lab
one can see why. (Losers dont complain so
much.)
Extremely useful modelling tool.

Strategies with Private values:


English Auction

Patent Races.
Political Campaigns.
Technology contests.
Procurement contests Architecture, Next
Generation Fighter Jet.
Sports contests. (Think of Chelsea, Man U,
Arsenal all buying the best players.)

The key to understanding this is to understand


that staying in does not affect the price one
pays if they win only whether one wins (it does
affect others prices).

Strategies with Private Values: First


Price

Strategies in the first-price should shade bid


below your value
This is because ones bid affects ones price.
Bidding your value will earn zero surplus.
Shading ones bid lowers the probability of
winning, but increases the surplus gained when
winning.

There is a natural trade-off between


probability of winning and profit if one wins.
If bid is b, value is v, expected profit is
Probwin(b)*(v-b)

Derivative of this w.r.t. b yields


Probwin(b)*(v-b)-Probwin(b)=0

First term is marginal benefit of prob of winning.


Second term is marginal cost of the profit if one
wins.

Strategies with Private Values: All


Pay
In the all-pay auction, you should again
shade bid below your value.
The natural trade-off is now between
probability of winning and cost of
bidding.
This cost is incurred whether you win or
not.
It only makes sense to incur a high cost
if the probability of winning is fairly high.
For low values, bids are shaded much
more than with first-price auctions.

Equilibrium Bid Functions

Strategies with uniform values.

Value

Values are drawn from 0 to 10 with an equal


chance of each amount (like in the lab). N is the
number of bidders.
1st-price the equilibrium bid (N-1)*v/N (that is if
v=5.50 and N=2, bid 2.75.
Dutch auction is the same as the 1st-price.
2nd-price, optimal to bid value. English optimal to
bid up to value.
All-pay auction, should bid (N-1) * (v/10)N * 10/N
(looks complicated but only we can see for low
values shade bid more than for high values).

Revenue Equivalence

Revenue Equivalence

10
8

2nd Price

Bid
6

1st-price
4
2

All-Pay
2

10

For private values, there is revenue


equivalence among all designs.
Not only that but all auctions are fully
efficient the buyer who values the
object the most winds up buying it.
If a seller wants to maximize revenue,
he can simply use an appropriate
minimum bid in any of the designs.
Problems happen if: asymmetry, risk
aversion, common values, seller info.

Common Value Auctions


I am auctioning off the right to sell refreshments
during lecture. The value is 200.
Al thinks it is worth 180
Bob thinks it is worth 190
Chris thinks it is worth 200
Doug thinks it is worth 210
Eric thinks it is worth 220
What is the revenue in a 2nd price auction where
everyone bids their estimated value? What is the
average estimate? What should they do to their bids?

One of the major findings of Auction Theory is the


celebrated Revenue Equivalence Theorem,
which states, for private values, that any
allocation mechanism/auction in which (i) the
bidder with the highest type/signal/value always
wins, (ii) the bidder with the lowest possible
type/value/signal expects zero surplus, (iii)
where all bidders are risk neutral and (iv) drawn
from a strictly increasing and atomless
distribution will lead to the same revenue for the
seller (and player i of type v can expect the
same surplus across auction types).

Book pages auction


In our auction: The object is fictitious and
worth the number of pages in the book in
pence. I will pay the difference between
the value and the price: v-p (if price is
above the number of pages, I will receive
the difference between the price and
value: p-v).

Book Pages Auction

Results

First-Price Auction: The person with the highest bid wins


the object and pays what he bids.
Second-Price Auction: The person with the highest bid
wins and pays the second highest bid.
The Prize: The number of pages in the book in pence. I
will pay the difference between this value and the price
offered: v-p (if price is above the value, I will receive the
difference between the price and value: p-v).

Name: __________________________________
Estimate the value
: _____________ Pence
Bid in First-Price auction
:_____________ Pence
Bid in Second-Price auction : ____________ Pence

Book had approx 450 pages


Averages were
609 estimate
459 first price
590 second price

Maxima were
1250 estimate
845 first price
2000 /1250 /900 second price

First-Price 2 bidders

Classroom Experiments

10
9

We ran a number of designs in the lab.

The buyers surplus is their combined


profit.
The sellers surplus is the sale revenue.
Total surplus is buyers + sellers.
Efficiency is 100*total surplus/potential
surplus.

8
7
6
Bid

First-Price with two buyers (random partners)


Second-Price with two buyers (random
partners)

5
4
3
2
1
0
0

10

10

Value

First-Price 4 bidder Auction

First Price 3 Bidder Auction

B id

B id

10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0

10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0

5
Value

10

Value

Second-Price 2 Bidder Auction


10
9
8
7
6
Bid

B id

First-Price 2 bidder auction w/ rebate

10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0

5
4
3
2
1

9 10

Bids in First-Price Auction

10

Bids in Second-Price Auction

10

10

6
Bid

Bid

5
Value

Value

1
0

0
0

10

Classroom Experiment Results


FP 2 bidders
SP 2 bidders
AP 2 bidders
Theory 2 bidders
FP 3 bidders
Theory 3 bidders
FP 4 bidders
Theory 4 bidders
FP rebate
Theory rebate

Bidders' % pie Seller's % of pie Efficiency


23%
74%
97%
40%
54%
94%
10%
84%
95%
50%
50%
100%
22%
25%
13%
20%
96%
0%
96%
100%
100%

10

Value

Value

Classroom Experiment Results

First

Price is best for the seller.

Second-Price is best for the buyers.


First-Price is best for efficiency.

Design may matter.

Careful design of rules

The airwave 3G auctions $34 billion in the


UK using a design based on the English
auction.
A few months afterwards, mirroring their
design Holland raised only $2.5 billion. On
a per capita basis less than 30% of the per
capital of the British Auction.
Why? Klemperer suggests that bids were
costly and limited number of buyers.

In the FCC auction, bidders communicated


which area they wanted by ending their bid
with the area code. For example,
$1,000,818.
In Australia auctioned off segments of
airways. No punishment for defaulting
after auction. Companies placed several
bids and defaulted with the high ones.
Went for 20th highest bid to the same two
companies.

Design Goals

Some tools

Efficiency - Want the bidder with the


highest value to win.
Revenue - May want to collect the highest
revenue.
Collusion, communication (FCC). Want to
avoid.
Entry - want to encourage.

Entry Fee- hurts entry, efficiency, helps revenue.


Minimum Bid - same.
Bid Cap hurts efficiency, helps entry.
Release information about object. Helps with
winners curse which may help revenue.
Release information about buyers. Tends to help
collusion.
Binmore: changing institutions changes
behavior, non-economists often do not forsee
this

You might also like