L36 Marston Theory

36
Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay
Module 6:
Lecture -1: Buried Structures
Content in this module:

Load on Pipes,
Marstons load theory for rigid and flexible pipes,
Trench and Projection conditions,
minimum cover,
Pipe floatation and Liquefaction.
Various classes of conduits installation (Spangler & Handy, 1973)

Buried pipes are divided into two
main categories: ditch conduits
(trench conduits) and projecting
conduits (embakment conduits)
Pipe is installed in a narrow

trench (generally, trench width
2 d) in undisturbed soil, then
backfilled to natural ground
surface level.
Examples of this type of
conduit are sewers, drains,
water mains, gas mains, and
buried oil pipelines.
Backfill
d
Ditch conduit

Projecting conduits are further divided into two groups:
Positive and Negative Projecting conduits.
A positive projecting conduit
is a conduit or pipe installed
in shallow bedding with the
top of the pipe cross-section
projecting above the natural
ground surface.
Highway and railroad culverts

are often installed in this way.
Positive projecting conduit

A negative projecting conduit is a
conduit installed in a relatively
narrow and shallow ditch with the
top of the conduit below the
natural ground surface; the ditch is
then backfilled with loose soil and
an embankment is constructed.
Effective in reducing the load on
the conduit, especially if the
backfill above the conduit is loose
soil.
Compacted soil
Negative
projective conduit
Special case, similar to negative

embankment condition, but more
favorable from standpoint of load
reduction on pipe, used in very
deep
installations.
Difficult
to
achieve for large-diameter pipes.
This type of construction is called
imperfect-ditch conduit or inducedtrench conduit.
Although effective in reducing

loads on conduits, this type of
construction with loose backfill
encourages channeling of seepage
flow through the embankment. Not
recommended for wet areas.
Imperfect ditch conduit
Types of buried pipes or conduits Top of the pipe

projects above the
ground surface
Ditch conduit
Positive projecting
conduit
Types of buried pipes or conduits

Pipe is placed in a shallow
trench and the top lies
below the ground surface
Negative
Projecting Conduit
Imperfect
Ditch Conduit
Marston load theory

In 1913, Anson Marston developed at theory to
explain the characteristics of a soil column above
a buried conduit.
Because of the shear resistance provided by the
walls of the trench, known as soil arching action, a
significant fraction of the weight of the soil above
the conduit is transferred to the walls of the ditch,
thus reducing the load on the conduit.
Soil arching
Arching can be best described as a transfer of forces
between a yielding mass of geomaterial and
adjoining stationary members.
A redistribution of stresses in the soil body takes place.
The shearing resistance tends to keep the yielding
mass in its original portion resulting in a change of
pressure on both the yielding parts support and the
adjoining part of soil.
Soil arching
If the yielding part moves downward, the shear
resistance will act upward and reduce the stress at
the base of yielding mass.
If the yielding part moves upward,
the shear
resistance will act downward to impede this
movement and cause of increase of stress at the
support of the yielding part.
Active arching
Displacements under pressure Ps when structure is

more compressible than surrounding soil
Active arching
Active arching occurs when the structure is more
compressible than the surrounding soil.
If the structure deforms uniformly on plane AA and
BB, the stresses on it tend to be lower toward the
edges due to mobilized shear stresses in the soil.
Stress distribution across plane AA or BB

Passive arching
Displacements under pressure Ps when structure is

less compressible than surrounding soil.
Passive arching
In passive arching, the soil is more compressible than the
structure.
As a result, the soil undergoes large displacements, mobilizing
shear stresses which increase the total pressure on the structure
while decreasing the pressure on the adjacent ground.
Assuming the structural deformations are uniform, the stresses
are highest at the edges and lowest at the centerline.
Stress distribution across plane AA or BB

Rigid pipe
When the side columns of soil or the external
prisms are more compressible than the pipe due to
its inherent rigidity, this causes the pipe to assume
load generated across the width of the trench.
The shearing stresses or friction forces that develop
due to the differential settlement of the external
prisms and the central prism are additive to the
load of the central prism alone. Rigid pipes
Rigid pipes show signs of distress before being
vertically deflected 2%
Effect of soil settlement on rigid pipe

Rigid
pipes include reinforced
concrete cylinder,
prestressed
concrete
cylinder,
vitrified
clay,
polymer concrete, cast
iron,
asbestos cement
and cast-in-situ pipes.
Effect of soil settlement on flexible pipe

If a pipe is more compressible than
the external soil columns as a result of
its vertical deflection allowing the
central prism to settle more in relation
to the external prisms, the actual load
on the pipe is less than the load of the
central prism due to the direction in
which the shearing stresses
Flexible pipes.
Deflection < 2% (with rigid lining

and coating)
<3% (with rigid lining
and flexible coating)
A flexible pipe has been

defined as one that will
deflect at least 2% without
structural distress.
Effect of soil settlement on flexible pipe

Flexible pipes include:
steel,
ductile iron,
thermoplastics such as Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC)
and High Density Polyethylene (HDPE),
thermosetting plastics such as fiberglass-reinforced
polymer (FRP),
bar-wrapped concrete cylinder pipe.
Arching effect in underground conduits
Flexible pipes
Rigid pipes
Semi-rigid pipe
Some pipe materials exhibit characteristics of both rigid
and flexible pipes, primarily controlled by their
diameters, are referred as Semi-rigid pipes.
Semi-rigid pipes deflect between 0.1% to 3% without
causing harmful or potentially harmful cracks.
For example, bar-wrapped concrete cylinder
Marston load theory (Narrow trench)

Assumptions:
The cohesion, if any, between the trench fill and the soil
in the trench sides is ignored because of its variable and
uncertain value, depending on the moisture condition.
[as 1) considerable time would have to elapse before

cohesion could develop and 2) the assumption of no cohesion
would yield the maximum load on the pipe]
The soil density and the frictional properties are

assumed to remain constant over the depth, and the soil
friction is assumed to vary in direct proportion to the
active horizontal pressure of the fill against the trench
faces
FBD of ditch conduit
The Marston load theory is based on the

concept of a prism of soil in the trench
that imposes a load on the pipe
For ditch conduits, the weight

of
the
overburden
soil
transferred to the underlying
soil, with due consideration to
soil arching action,
Equating
upward
and
downward
forces
on
horizontal slice, we get:
After Spangler and Handy (2007)
B = Bd
Per unit length

where = unit weight of granular backfill; B = Bd
trench width; and Cd = load coefficient expressed
as:
where K = coefficient of earth pressure; and =

coefficient of friction for the granular soil backfill-ditch
wall interface, which can vary between 0 for a smooth
wall and tan for a very rough wall, where is the angle
of shearing resistance of the granular soil backfill.
Variation of Cd with z/B for

different values of K
Handy and Spangler (2007)
suggested that K can be
taken conservatively as 0.11
for saturated clays and 0.19
for harsh granular soils, with
all other soils lying within
this range.
Marston proposed Ka for K

originally. Now KKo
When K increases, there is

significant reduction in Cd
the
load
and
hence
transferred to the conduit.
tan =
Approximate values of ratio of lateral to vertical

earth pressure (K) and Coefficient of friction against
sides of trench
Substituting h = H (i.e. z =H), we get the total

vertical pressure at the elevation of the top of the
conduit.
How much of this vertical load V is imposed on the
conduit
is
dependent
upon
the
relative
compressibility (stiffness) of the pipe and soil.
For very rigid pipe (clay, concrete, heavy-walled
cast iron, and so forth), the side fills may be very
compressible in relation to the pipe, and the pipe
may carry practically all the load V.
For flexible pipe, the imposed load will be
substantially less than V since the pipe will be less
rigid than the side fill soil.
Schematic representation of soil-pipe contribution in

load carrying capacity
Effect of ditch width on the loading on pipe

Width of trench
Width of trench
Less load on
the pipe
More load on
the pipe
P1
Undisturbed
soil
P2
(After NYSDOT Geotechnical design manual)
The load carried by pipe increases with the width of the trench.
So, the width of the trench should just be enough for compaction
of the soil on the sides of the pipe.
Mode of failure of Flexible pipes
P1
Well compacted soil provides
good lateral support to pipes
P2
Poorly compacted soil provides
reduced lateral support to pipes
Mode of failure of Rigid pipes
Cracking
P1
Structural strength and well compacted
soil provides good lateral support to pipes
P2
Poor structural strength provides
reduced lateral support to pipes

L36 Marston Theory

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

L36 Marston Theory

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

L36 Marston Theory

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What are the different types of buried conduits discussed?

What are the different types of buried conduits discussed?

What factors affect the load transferred to buried pipes?

What factors affect the load transferred to buried pipes?

36

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Content in this module:

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Various classes of conduits installation (Spangler & Handy, 1973)

Pipe is installed in a narrow

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Various classes of conduits installation (Spangler & Handy, 1973)

Highway and railroad culverts

Various classes of conduits installation (Spangler & Handy, 1973)

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Various classes of conduits installation (Spangler & Handy, 1973)

Special case, similar to negative

Although effective in reducing

Imperfect ditch conduit

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Types of buried pipes or conduits Top of the pipe

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Types of buried pipes or conduits

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Marston load theory

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Displacements under pressure Ps when structure is

Stress distribution across plane AA or BB

Displacements under pressure Ps when structure is

Stress distribution across plane AA or BB

Effect of soil settlement on rigid pipe

Effect of soil settlement on flexible pipe

Deflection < 2% (with rigid lining

A flexible pipe has been

Effect of soil settlement on flexible pipe

Arching effect in underground conduits

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Marston load theory (Narrow trench)

[as 1) considerable time would have to elapse before

The soil density and the frictional properties are

FBD of ditch conduit

The Marston load theory is based on the

For ditch conduits, the weight

After Spangler and Handy (2007)

Per unit length

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

FBD of ditch conduit

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

FBD of ditch conduit

where K = coefficient of earth pressure; and =

Variation of Cd with z/B for

Marston proposed Ka for K

When K increases, there is

Approximate values of ratio of lateral to vertical

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay