Senate Hearing, 109TH Congress - Indian Health Care Improvement Act
Senate Hearing, 109TH Congress - Indian Health Care Improvement Act
Senate Hearing, 109TH Congress - Indian Health Care Improvement Act
109162
JOINT HEARING
BEFORE THE
S. 1057
INDIAN HEALTH CARE IMPROVEMENT ACT AMENDMENTS OF 2005
JULY 14, 2005
WASHINGTON, DC
S. HRG. 109162
JOINT HEARING
BEFORE THE
S. 1057
INDIAN HEALTH CARE IMPROVEMENT ACT AMENDMENTS OF 2005
JULY 14, 2005
WASHINGTON, DC
(
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
22554 PDF
WASHINGTON
2005
(II)
CONTENTS
Page
4
363
352
334
1
353
335
335
348
350
334
334
335
347
335
361
APPENDIX
Prepared statements:
Anderson, Trudy, President/CEO, Alaska Native Health Board ..................
Brandjord, DDS, Robert (with attachment) ...................................................
Brannan, Richard .............................................................................................
Cantwell, Hon. Maria, U.S. Senator from Washington .................................
Dorgan, Hon. Byron L., U.S. Senator from North Dakota, vice chairman,
Committee on Indian Affairs .......................................................................
Enzi, Hon. Michael B., U.S. Senator from Wyoming, chairman, Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions ..........................................
Forquera, Ralph (with attachment) ................................................................
Friedman, DDS, MPH, Jay W. (with attachment) .........................................
Gottlieb, Katherine, president/CEO, Southern Foundation ..........................
Grim, Dr. Charles .............................................................................................
Ignace, Georgiana, president, National Council of Urban Indian Health ...
Inouye, Hon. Daniel K., U.S. Senator from Hawaii .......................................
Joseph, Rachel A. (with attachment) ..............................................................
Kardos, B.D.S., M.D.S., Ph.D., FFOP (RCPA), Thomas B., professor of
Oral Biology and Oral Pathology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New
Zealand (with attachment) ...........................................................................
Kashevaroff, Don ..............................................................................................
Kelso, DDS, Mark, Norton Sound dental director, Nome, AK ......................
Kennedy, Hon. Edward M., U.S. Senator from Massachusetts ....................
Kovaleski, DDS, Tom, director, Southcentral Foundation Dental Program
McCain, Hon. John, U.S. Senator from Arizona, chairman, Committee
on Indian Affairs ...........................................................................................
Milgrom, DDS, Peter, center director, Professor of Dental Public Sciences
and Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA ..................
(III)
452
385
440
375
376
377
456
570
581
584
598
379
623
643
716
381
379
382
380
750
IV
Page
Prepared statementsContinued
Murray, Hon. Patty, U.S. Senator from Washington ....................................
Nash, D.M.D., M.S., Ed.D., David A., professor of pediatric dentistry
in the College of Dentistry at the University of Kentucky in Lexington,
KY (with attachment) ...................................................................................
Willard, William R., professor of dental education; professor of pediatric
dentistry, University of Kentucky Medical Center (with attachment) .....
Williard, Dr. Mary ............................................................................................
Additional material submitted for the record:
Letters:
Clark, Robert J., Bristol Bay Area Health Corporation ................................
Dawson, RDH, BS, Katie L., president, American Dental Hygienists Association .........................................................................................................
Evans, Robert D. ...............................................................................................
Juan-Saunders, Vivian, president, Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, chairwoman, Tohono Oodham Nation (position paper) .....................................
Kaufmann, ND, Andrew J., San Carlos Apache Tribe ..................................
Sekiguchi, et al, letter to the Editor, American Journal of Public Health,
November 2005 .............................................................................................
Questions:
From Hon. Orin G. Hatch, U.S. Senator from Utah (no responses at
time of printing) ............................................................................................
Reports:
Intergrated Dental Health Program for Alaska Native Populations, by
Howard Bailit, D.M.D; Tryfon Beazoglou, Ph.D; Amid Ismail, D.D.S.;
and Thomas Kovaleski, D.D.S. ....................................................................
381
757
757
784
788
793
798
800
804
806
383
808
Senator ENZI. I am going to call to order this historic joint meeting of the Committee on Indian Affairs and the Committee on
Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. Todays hearing will focus
on the state of Indian health care and specifically the Indian
Health Care Improvement Act.
We will be welcoming Senator McCain here shortly, and the rest
of the members of the Indian Affairs Committee to our HELP Committee meeting room. Senator Kennedy and I started a policy of
punctuality and we are continuing that. We will go ahead and
make our comments and then they can make theirs when they arrive.
Earlier this year, Senator McCain did approach me about holding
a joint committee hearing on the state of Indian health care. I immediately accepted, as health care is important, perhaps the most
important issue facing tribes today, in fact, facing all people today.
Todays hearing will enable us to chart our current progress and
discuss what we can do to increase the services that are available
to address the physical and emotional problems that continue to
plague American Indians and Alaska Natives.
When the Indian Health Care Improvement Act was first signed
into law in 1976, it was written to address the findings of surveys
and studies that indicated that the health status of American Indians and Alaska Natives was far below that of the general population. It continues to be a matter of serious concern that, as the
health status of most Americans continues to rise, the status of
(1)
2
American Indians and Alaska Natives has not kept pace with the
general population.
Studies show that American Indians and Alaska Natives die at
a higher rate than other Americans from alcoholism, tuberculosis,
auto accidents, diabetes, homicide and suicide. In addition, a safe
and adequate water supply and waste disposal facilities, something
we all take for granted, is not available in 12 percent of American
Indian and Alaska Native homes, as opposed to 1 percent in the
rest of the Nation.
Several years ago, residents of the Wind River Reservation in
Central Wyoming faced a drinking water shortage that threatened
the health and safety of everybody in the area, so drinking water
was donated to tribal members and local residents. The lack of
these basic services makes life even harsher for these people and
contributes to those already-high death rates. Coming from Wyoming, I know full well the problems we encounter in the effort to
provide quality health care to all people of my home State.
As I noted during my visits to the Wind River Reservation, their
problems are not unique. They have an impact on all those who
live on reservations from coast to coast. We need to take a varied
approach to address each of those problems separately. Clearly,
people of different ages have different problems.
A multifaceted approach to solving each of the problems will require a systematic, as well as financial approach. Local, State and
national governments and agencies must work together with tribal
leaders to focus our resources where they will do the most good.
That kind of approach has the greatest chance of being successful.
I appreciate all the witnesses taking time out of their busy
schedules to be with us today. In addition, of course, I would like
to welcome Richard Brannan, the chairman of the Northern Arapaho Business Council of Fort Washakie, WY. No one knows better
than he does the problems faced by those living on reservations
and by those who rely on the Indian Health Service for their health
care needs. I am very pleased he was able to make the journey and
to share his experiences with us today.
I look forward to his comments and those of the entire list of witnesses. Each of you has a perspective and a point of view to share
that only you can provide. I look forward to hearing a summary of
your prepared remarks so that we can address the underlying
issues during our question and answer session.
To the members of the joint committees, we have a longstanding
tradition on the HELP Committee that opening statements are
made by the Chairman and Ranking Member, and due to the combined number of members of both committees and the fact that we
have three panels and the fact that we begin voting again at 3
p.m., I would respectfully submit or ask that the tradition apply for
todays hearing, but all members full statements will be made a
part of the record, as will all witnesses full statements be made a
part of the record.
In addition, members may use the question and answer period
to make remarks. I did mention that this is an historic situation
of having the two committees that have an intense interest in Indian health working together to come up with some solutions. I
really appreciate Chairman McCain suggesting that, and following
3
through on it. I think this will be the first time that this has actually been done outside of Energy and Water. This is probably an
appropriate place to do it.
[Text of S. 1057 follows:]
II
109TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
S. 1057
To amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to revise and extend
that Act.
A BILL
To amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to revise
and extend that Act.
1
7
8
ED.
2
1
2
(b) TABLE
OF
1.
2.
3.
4.
201.
202.
203.
204.
205.
S 1057 IS
3
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
206.
207.
208.
209.
210.
211.
212.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
301.
302.
303.
304.
305.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
306.
307.
308.
309.
310.
311.
312.
313.
314.
315.
316.
317.
4
Sec. 407. Payor of last resort.
Sec. 408. Nondiscrimination in qualifications for reimbursement for services.
Sec. 409. Consultation.
Sec. 410. State Childrens Health Insurance Program (SCHIP).
Sec. 411. Social Security Act sanctions.
Sec. 412. Cost sharing.
Sec. 413. Treatment under Medicaid managed care.
Sec. 414. Navajo Nation Medicaid Agency feasibility study.
Sec. 415. Authorization of appropriations.
TITLE VHEALTH SERVICES FOR URBAN INDIANS
Sec. 501. Purpose.
Sec. 502. Contracts with, and grants to, Urban Indian Organizations.
Sec. 503. Contracts and grants for the provision of health care and referral services.
Sec. 504. Contracts and grants for the determination of unmet health
care needs.
Sec. 505. Evaluations; renewals.
Sec. 506. Other contract and grant requirements.
Sec. 507. Reports and records.
Sec. 508. Limitation on contract authority.
Sec. 509. Facilities.
Sec. 510. Office of Urban Indian Health.
Sec. 511. Grants for alcohol and substance abuse-related services.
Sec. 512. Treatment of certain demonstration projects.
Sec. 513. Urban NIAAA transferred programs.
Sec. 514. Consultation with Urban Indian Organizations.
Sec. 515. Federal Tort Claim Act coverage.
Sec. 516. Urban youth treatment center demonstration.
Sec. 517. Use of Federal Government facilities and sources of supply.
Sec. 518. Grants for diabetes prevention, treatment, and control.
Sec. 519. Community health representatives.
Sec. 520. Regulations.
Sec. 521. Eligibility for services.
Sec. 522. Authorization of appropriations.
TITLE VIORGANIZATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS
Sec. 601. Establishment of the Indian Health Service as an agency of the
Public Health Service.
Sec. 602. Automated management information system.
Sec. 603. Authorization of appropriations.
TITLE VIIBEHAVIORAL HEALTH PROGRAMS
Sec. 701. Behavioral health prevention and treatment services.
Sec. 702. Memoranda of agreement with the Department of the Interior.
Sec. 703. Comprehensive behavioral health prevention and treatment program.
Sec. 704. Mental health technician program.
Sec. 705. Licensing requirement for mental health care workers.
Sec. 706. Indian women treatment programs.
Sec. 707. Indian youth program.
S 1057 IS
5
Sec. 708. Inpatient and community-based mental health facilities design,
construction, and staffing.
Sec. 709. Training and community education.
Sec. 710. Behavioral health program.
Sec. 711. Fetal alcohol disorder funding.
Sec. 712. Child sexual abuse and prevention treatment programs.
Sec. 713. Behavioral health research.
Sec. 714. Definitions.
Sec. 715. Authorization of appropriations.
TITLE VIIIMISCELLANEOUS
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
801.
802.
803.
804.
805.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
Sec.
806.
807.
808.
809.
810.
811.
812.
813.
814.
Sec. 815.
Sec. 816.
1
2
Reports.
Regulations.
Plan of implementation.
Availability of funds.
Limitation on use of funds appropriated to the Indian Health
Service.
Eligibility of California Indians.
Health services for ineligible persons.
Reallocation of base resources.
Results of demonstration projects.
Provision of services in Montana.
Moratorium.
Tribal employment.
Severability provisions.
Establishment of National Bipartisan Commission on Indian
Health Care.
Appropriations; availability.
Authorization of appropriations.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
10
11
S 1057 IS
6
1
10
11
12
13
ICY.
17
18
19
20
21
22
sor objectives;
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
10
7
1
10
11
12
13
14
15
by the Service.
16
17
SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS.
18
19
20
21
thority.
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
11
8
1
graphic area.
3
4
sive services.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
12
9
1
Human Services.
of disease, including
(A) controlling
10
11
12
(iv) injuries;
13
14
ities;
15
16
and
17
18
(B) providing
19
20
(ii) immunizations.
21
22
23
24
gynecology,
25
S 1057 IS
podiatric
medicine,
nursing,
public
13
10
1
sion.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
(C) promoting education and work in conformity with physical and mental capacity;
17
18
19
20
(E) improving the physical, economic, cultural, psychological, and social environment;
21
22
23
Practices; and
24
25
S 1057 IS
14
11
1
physical);
HIV/AIDS;
10
11
12
13
orders;
14
15
16
17
safety;
18
19
20
between
health
21
through
appropriate
22
23
systems;
24
care
provider
means,
visits,
including
25
practices;
S 1057 IS
15
12
1
fant care;
planning;
10
11
conditions;
12
13
14
15
16
17
prevention;
18
19
duction;
20
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
16
13
1
who
10
11
12
13
reside; or
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
means
24
25
S 1057 IS
17
14
1
10
11
12
13
1058(e)).
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Human Services.
23
24
S 1057 IS
18
15
1
2
(19) The term Service Area means the geographical area served by each Area Office.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
ices.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
19
16
1
10
11
12
13
14
15
et seq.).
16
17
18
19
450 et seq.).
20
21
22
23
24
retary.
S 1057 IS
20
17
1
10
11
12
such member.
13
14
15
16
17
any purpose.
18
19
20
Secretary.
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
21
18
1
section 503(a).
TITLE
IINDIAN
HEALTH,
HUMAN RESOURCES, AND DEVELOPMENT
5
6
16
17
FOR INDIANS.
18 the Service, shall make grants to public or nonprofit pri19 vate health or educational entities, Tribal Health Pro20 grams, or Urban Indian Organizations to assist such enti21 ties in meeting the costs of
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
22
19
1
2
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
to in paragraph (1).
17
(b) FUNDING.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
23
20
1
(2) AMOUNT
OF
FUNDS;
PAYMENT.The
10
11
12
Act.
13
14
15
20
21
22
fessions.
23
S 1057 IS
24
21
1
10
11
12
13
14
15 section
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
25
22
1
2
3
(a) IN GENERAL.
(1)
AUTHORITY.The
Secretary,
acting
10
11
12
(2) ALLOCATION
BY FORMULA.Except
as
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
(3) CONTINUITY
OF PRIOR SCHOLARSHIPS.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
26
23
1
(4) CERTAIN
(1) OBLIGATION
MET.The
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
lowing:
17
18
19
of this Act.
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
27
24
1
(2) OBLIGATION
DEFERRED.At
the request
10
11
12
13
14
15
conditions:
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Secretary).
S 1057 IS
28
25
1
(1).
10
11
12
enrolled; or
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
29
26
1
10
11
12
fice); or
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
rolled.
20
21
(1) SPECIFIED
BREACHES.An
individual
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
30
27
1
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
contract.
20
(2) OTHER
BREACHES.If
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
31
28
1
(3) CANCELLATION
ENT.Upon
(4) WAIVERS
AND SUSPENSIONS.The
Sec-
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
be unconscionable.
24
(5) EXTREME
25
HARDSHIP.Notwithstanding
S 1057 IS
32
29
1
(6)
BANKRUPTCY.Notwithstanding
any
10
11
12
13
14
be unconscionable.
15
16
17
GRAM.
18 through the Service, shall make grants to at least 3 col19 leges and universities for the purpose of developing and
20 maintaining Indian psychology career recruitment pro21 grams as a means of encouraging Indians to enter the
22 mental health field. These programs shall be located at
23 various locations throughout the country to maximize their
24 availability to Indian students and new programs shall be
25 established in different locations from time to time.
S 1057 IS
33
30
1
2 Secretary shall provide a grant authorized under sub3 section (a) to develop and maintain a program at the Uni4 versity of North Dakota to be known as the Quentin N.
5 Burdick American Indians Into Psychology Program.
6 Such program shall, to the maximum extent feasible, co7 ordinate with the Quentin N. Burdick Indian Health Pro8 grams authorized under section 117(b), the Quentin N.
9 Burdick American Indians Into Nursing Program author10 ized under section 115(e), and existing university research
11 and communications networks.
12
(d) CONDITIONS
OF
19
20
21
22
gram;
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
34
31
1
activities;
10
11
Indian students;
12
13
14
15
16
17
24
25
Act; or
S 1057 IS
35
32
1
8
9
10
GRAMS.
(a) IN GENERAL.
(1) GRANTS
AUTHORIZED.The
Secretary,
11
12
13
14
15
16
graph (1) for any fiscal year shall not exceed 5 per-
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
(b) REQUIREMENTS.
24
25
(1) IN
GENERAL.A
S 1057 IS
36
33
1
3
4
9
10
11
OF
12 shall provide scholarships under this section only to Indi13 ans enrolled or accepted for enrollment in a course of
14 study (approved by the Secretary) in one of the health pro15 fessions contemplated by this Act.
16
17 subsection (b), the Secretary and the Tribal Health Pro18 gram shall enter into a written contract with each recipi19 ent of such scholarship. Such contract shall
20
21
22
23
24
for
S 1057 IS
37
34
1
greater; or
agree;
(2)
10
scholarship
11
provide
that
the
amount
of
the
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
38
35
1
10
11
and
12
13
14
15
16
(1) SPECIFIC
BREACHES.An
individual who
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
39
36
1
3
4
10
11
12
13
14
contract.
15
(2) OTHER
BREACHES.If
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
(3) CANCELLATION
ENT.Upon
S 1057 IS
40
37
1
(f) RELATION
TO
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
(2)
to
accept
assignment
under
section
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
41
38
1
(g) CONTINUANCE
OF
FUNDING.The Secretary
S 1057 IS
42
39
1
OF
EMPLOYMENT.Any indi-
2 vidual enrolled in a program, including a high school pro3 gram, authorized under section 102(a) may be employed
4 by the Service or by a Tribal Health Program or an Urban
5 Indian Organization during any nonacademic period of the
6 year. Any such employment shall not exceed 120 days dur7 ing any calendar year.
8
9
(d) NONAPPLICABILITY
NEL
OF
COMPETITIVE PERSON-
S 1057 IS
43
40
1 nificant portion of Indians reside, the Secretary, acting
2 through the Service, may provide allowances to health pro3 fessionals employed in an Indian Health Program or an
4 Urban Indian Organization to enable them for a period
5 of time each year prescribed by regulation of the Secretary
6 to take leave of their duty stations for professional con7 sultation and refresher training courses.
8
9
10
GRAM.
(1) provide for the training of Indians as community health representatives; and
17
18
19
20
nities.
21
24
25
S 1057 IS
44
41
1
the Program;
4
5
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
(4) maintain a system that provides close supervision of Community Health Representatives;
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
45
42
1
6
7
PROGRAM.
(a)
ESTABLISHMENT.The
Secretary,
acting
8 through the Service, shall establish and administer a pro9 gram to be known as the Service Loan Repayment Pro10 gram (hereinafter referred to as the Loan Repayment
11 Program) in order to ensure an adequate supply of
12 trained health professionals necessary to maintain accredi13 tation of, and provide health care services to Indians
14 through, Indian Health Programs and Urban Indian Or15 ganizations.
16
(1)(A) be enrolled
20
21
22
mined
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
by
the
Secretary
under
section
46
43
1
(B) have
sion;
10
11
12
13
14
Health Service;
15
16
17
18
19
gation; and
20
21
22
(c) APPLICATION.
23
(1) INFORMATION
TO BE INCLUDED WITH
24
FORMS.In
25
S 1057 IS
47
44
1
10
11
12
13
14
15
(2) CLEAR
LANGUAGE.The
application form,
16
17
18
19
20
Repayment Program.
21
(3) TIMELY
AVAILABILITY OF FORMS.The
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
48
45
1
(d) PRIORITIES.
4
5
10
ity.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
to
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
49
46
1
2
3
(1) CONTRACT
REQUIRED.An
individual be-
(2).
(2) CONTENTS
OF CONTRACT.The
written
10
11
12
13
14
Secretary agrees
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
50
47
1
individual agrees
10
11
12
13
14
15
academic
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
standing
(as
deter-
51
48
1
retary;
10
subparagraph (A)(ii)(III);
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
and
21
22
23
S 1057 IS
52
49
1
(f) DEADLINE
FOR
DECISION
ON
APPLICATION.
excess of 4 years; or
10
11
(g) PAYMENTS.
12
(1) IN
GENERAL.A
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
53
50
1
10
11
12
consider
13
determination
the
extent
to
which
each
such
14
15
16
17
18
tracts;
19
20
21
22
professionals; and
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
54
51
1
Program.
10
11
12
(4) REIMBURSEMENTS
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
and
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
55
52
1
(5)
PAYMENT
SCHEDULE.The
Secretary
(j) APPLICABILITY
OF
18 Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 215) shall not apply
19 to individuals during their period of obligated service
20 under the Loan Repayment Program.
21
(k) ASSIGNMENT
OF INDIVIDUALS.The
Secretary,
22 in assigning individuals to serve in Indian Health Pro23 grams or Urban Indian Organizations pursuant to con24 tracts entered into under this section, shall
S 1057 IS
56
53
1
and
10
11
section.
12
13
(1) SPECIFIC
BREACHES.An
individual who
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
if that individual
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
57
54
1
the Secretary);
rollment; or
10
11
gram.
12
(2)
OTHER
BREACHES;
FORMULA
FOR
13
AMOUNT OWED.If,
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
in which
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
58
55
1
10
11
12
(3) DEDUCTIONS
IN MEDICARE PAYMENTS.
13
14
15
16
curity Act.
17
(4) TIME
PERIOD
FOR
REPAYMENT.Any
18
19
20
21
22
23
Secretary.
24
(5) RECOVERY
S 1057 IS
OF DELINQUENCY.
59
56
1
(A) IN
GENERAL.If
damages described
ices; or
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
subsection.
20
21
GENERAL.The
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
60
57
1
(2) CANCELED
UPON DEATH.Any
obligation
(3) HARDSHIP
WAIVER.The
Secretary may
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 President, for inclusion in each report required to be sub24 mitted to Congress under section 801, a report concerning
S 1057 IS
61
58
1 the previous fiscal year which sets forth by Service Area
2 the following:
3
tion is difficult.
profession.
10
11
12
health profession.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
profession.
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
62
59
1
ficult.
7
8
ERY FUND.
SECRETARY.Amounts
in the LRRF
21
22
23
Program
24
25
S 1057 IS
63
60
1
(2) BY
Tribal
10
11
12
13
14
services.
15
(c) INVESTMENT
OF
S 1057 IS
64
61
1
(d) SALE
OF
(a) REIMBURSEMENT
FOR
TRAVEL.The Sec-
19
20
GRAM.
S 1057 IS
65
62
1
S 1057 IS
66
63
1 such individual an amount to be determined in accordance
2 with the formula specified in subsection (l) of section 110
3 in the manner provided for in such subsection.
4
FOR
PARTICIPATION.
9
10
NURSING PROGRAM.
16
17
18
19
20
21
private institutions.
22
(b) USE
OF
S 1057 IS
67
64
1
10
11
12
services to Indians.
13
14
15
16
nurses.
17
18
19
S 1057 IS
68
65
1
(d) PREFERENCES
FOR
GRANT RECIPIENTS.In
10
11
students.
12
S 1057 IS
69
66
1 ance described in paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (b)
2 that is funded by a grant provided under subsection (a).
3 Such obligation shall be met by service
4
dian Affairs);
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
number of Indians.
18
19
OF
EMPLOYEES.The
S 1057 IS
70
67
1
2 Secretary shall establish a program which shall, to the ex3 tent feasible
4
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Service Area.
14
15
16 through the Service, is authorized to provide grants to col17 leges and universities for the purpose of maintaining and
18 expanding the Indian health careers recruitment program
19 known as the Indians Into Medicine Program (herein20 after in this section referred to as INMED) as a means
21 of encouraging Indians to enter the health professions.
22
23 shall provide one of the grants authorized under sub24 section (a) to maintain the INMED program at the Uni25 versity of North Dakota, to be known as the Quentin N.
S 1057 IS
71
68
1 Burdick Indian Health Programs, unless the Secretary
2 makes a determination, based upon program reviews, that
3 the program is not meeting the purposes of this section.
4 Such program shall, to the maximum extent feasible, co5 ordinate with the Quentin N. Burdick American Indians
6 Into Psychology Program established under section 105(b)
7 and the Quentin N. Burdick American Indians Into Nurs8 ing Program established under section 115.
9
16
17
18
19
by the program;
20
21
22
23
program;
24
25
S 1057 IS
72
69
1
and
7
8
9
10
11
12
COLLEGES.
GENERAL.The
Secretary, acting
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
(2) AMOUNT
OF GRANTS.The
amount of any
22
23
24
25
$100,000.
S 1057 IS
73
70
1
2
3
(b) GRANTS
FOR
MAINTENANCE
AND
RECRUIT-
ING.
(1) IN
GENERAL.The
Secretary, acting
10
11
which
12
(A) is accredited;
13
14
15
16
sionals;
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
and
S 1057 IS
74
71
1
appropriate certifications;
10
11
section.
12
17
18
19
and
20
21
to such colleges.
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
75
72
1
3
4
(A) has already received a degree or diploma in such health profession; and
(2) MAY
10
11
12
13 of subsection (b) are met, funding priority shall be pro14 vided to tribal colleges and universities in Service Areas
15 where they exist.
16
17
24
25
difficult;
S 1057 IS
76
73
1
tions;
(3) has
dian Organization; or
curred as a requirement of
10
11
or
12
13
14
15
16
17
1 year.
18
19 the retention bonus which shall provide for a higher an20 nual rate for multiyear agreements than for single year
21 agreements referred to in subsection (a)(4), but in no
22 event shall the annual rate be more than $25,000 per
23 annum.
24
(c) DEFAULT
OF
RETENTION AGREEMENT.Any
S 1057 IS
77
74
1 term of service, except where such failure is through no
2 fault of the individual, shall be obligated to refund to the
3 Government the full amount of the retention bonus for the
4 period covered by the agreement, plus interest as deter5 mined by the Secretary in accordance with section
6 110(l)(2)(B).
7
8 may pay a retention bonus to any health professional em9 ployed by a Tribal Health Program if such health profes10 sional is serving in a position which the Secretary deter11 mines is
12
13
14
15
16
17
(a) ESTABLISHMENT
OF
PROGRAM.The Sec-
18 retary, acting through the Service, shall establish a pro19 gram to enable Indians who are licensed practical nurses,
20 licensed vocational nurses, and registered nurses who are
21 working in an Indian Health Program or Urban Indian
22 Organization, and have done so for a period of not less
23 than 1 year, to pursue advanced training. Such program
24 shall include a combination of education and work study
25 in an Indian Health Program or Urban Indian Organiza-
S 1057 IS
78
75
1 tion leading to an associate or bachelors degree (in the
2 case of a licensed practical nurse or licensed vocational
3 nurse), a bachelors degree (in the case of a registered
4 nurse), or advanced degrees or certifications in nursing
5 and public health.
6
19
20
KA.
OF
PROGRAM.Under the
S 1057 IS
79
76
1
2
10
11
12 retary, acting through the Community Health Aide Pro13 gram of the Service, shall
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
gram;
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
80
77
1
3(2);
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
cation;
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
81
78
1
7
8
GRAM.
(1) IN
GENERAL.The
Secretary, acting
10
11
12
13
14
(2) LIMITED
CERTIFICATION.Except
for any
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
(A) early childhood dental disease prevention and reversible dental procedures; and
22
23
24
(3) REVIEW.
S 1057 IS
82
79
1
(A) IN
GENERAL.During
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
(C) FUTURE
AUTHORIZATION OF CER-
21
TIFICATIONS.Before
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
83
80
1
appropriate.
DEMONSTRATION PROGRAMS.
10
11 The Secretary, acting through the Service, may fund dem12 onstration programs for Tribal Health Programs to ad13 dress the chronic shortages of health professionals.
14
(b) PURPOSES
OF
PROGRAMS.The purposes of
18
19
20
21
22
professionals; and
23
24
S 1057 IS
84
81
1
the region.
4 grams established pursuant to subsection (a) shall incor5 porate a program advisory board composed of representa6 tives from the Indian Tribes and Indian communities in
7 the area which will be served by the program.
8
9
(a) NO REDUCTION
IN
SERVICES.The Secretary
10 shall not
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
ices.
20
21 Health Service Corps scholars qualifying for the Commis22 sioned Corps in the United States Public Health Service
23 shall be exempt from the full-time equivalent limitations
24 of the National Health Service Corps and the Service
S 1057 IS
85
82
1 when serving as a commissioned corps officer in a Tribal
2 Health Program or an Urban Indian Organization.
3
4
5
(a) GRANTS
AND
(b) USE
OF
OF
ASSISTANCE; RENEWAL.A
17 contract entered into or a grant provided under this sec18 tion shall be for a period of 1 year. Such contract or grant
19 may be renewed for an additional 1-year period upon the
20 approval of the Secretary.
21
22
(d) CRITERIA
PLICATIONS.Not
FOR
REVIEW
AND
APPROVAL
OF
AP-
S 1057 IS
86
83
1 and universities and eligible accredited and accessible com2 munity colleges, shall develop and issue criteria for the
3 review and approval of applications for funding (including
4 applications for renewals of funding) under this section.
5 Such criteria shall ensure that demonstration programs
6 established under this section promote the development of
7 the capacity of such entities to educate substance abuse
8 counselors.
9
10 technical and other assistance as may be necessary to en11 able grant recipients to comply with the provisions of this
12 section.
13
23
24
S 1057 IS
87
84
1
2
3
4 the Service, and the Secretary of the Interior, in consulta5 tion with Indian Tribes and Tribal Organizations, shall
6 conduct a study and compile a list of the types of staff
7 positions specified in subsection (b) whose qualifications
8 include, or should include, training in the identification,
9 prevention, education, referral, or treatment of mental ill10 ness, or dysfunctional and self destructive behavior.
11
14
15
of
16
17
18
welfare;
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
88
85
1
ganizations.
(1) IN
GENERAL.The
appropriate Secretary
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
(2) POSITION
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
89
86
1
2
ON
MENTAL ILL-
S 1057 IS
90
87
1
2
(1) eliminating the deficiencies in health status and health resources of all Indian Tribes;
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
and
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
91
88
1
ciencies:
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
tioners.
17
18
19
20
21
Indians.
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
92
89
1
2
GENERAL.Funds
appropriated under
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
(2)
20
FUNDS.The
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
APPORTIONMENT
OF
ALLOCATED
93
90
1
AND
TO
HEALTH STATUS
which
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
geographic,
16
cumstances.
17
(2) AVAILABLE
climatic,
rural,
or
RESOURCES.The
other
cir-
health re-
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
local governments.
S 1057 IS
94
91
1
(3) PROCESS
TIONS.The
ganization.
(e) ELIGIBILITY
FOR
20
21
22
that methodology;
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
95
92
1
Program; and
(4) an estimate of
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
(g) INCLUSION
IN
22 priated under this section for any fiscal year shall be in23 cluded in the base budget of the Service for the purpose
24 of determining appropriations under this section in subse25 quent fiscal years.
S 1057 IS
96
93
1
2 tended to diminish the primary responsibility of the Serv3 ice to eliminate existing backlogs in unmet health care
4 needs, nor are the provisions of this section intended to
5 discourage the Service from undertaking additional efforts
6 to achieve equity among Indian Tribes and Tribal Organi7 zations.
8
9 priated under the authority of this section shall be des10 ignated as the Indian Health Care Improvement Fund.
11
12
18
this section.
19
S 1057 IS
97
94
1
(c) CONDITIONS
ON
USE
OF
FUND.No part of
9 the negotiated rulemaking process under title VIII, pro10 mulgate regulations consistent with the provisions of this
11 section to
12
13
14
15
from CHEF;
16
17
18
19
20
21
tablish at
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
98
95
1
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
(e) NO OFFSET
OR
LIMITATION.Amounts appro-
S 1057 IS
99
96
1 13) (commonly known as the Snyder Act), or any other
2 law.
3
(f) DEPOSIT
OF
REIMBURSEMENT FUNDS.There
10
11
SERVICES.
16
dians.
17
(b) PROVISION
OF
S 1057 IS
100
97
1 is required to be submitted to Congress under section 801
2 an evaluation of
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
TROL.
16 The Secretary, acting through the Service, and in con17 sultation with Indian Tribes and Tribal Organizations,
18 shall determine
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
101
98
1
(c) FUNDING
FOR
17 continue to maintain each model diabetes project in exist18 ence on the date of enactment of the Indian Health
19 Amendments Care Improvement Act of 2005, any such
20 other diabetes programs operated by the Service or Tribal
21 Health Programs, and any additional diabetes projects,
22 such as the Medical Vanguard program provided for in
23 title IV of Public Law 10887, as implemented to serve
24 Indian Tribes. Tribal Health Programs shall receive recur25 ring funding for the diabetes projects that they operate
S 1057 IS
102
99
1 pursuant to this section, both at the date of enactment
2 of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act Amendments
3 of 2005 and for projects which are added and funded
4 thereafter.
5
(d) FUNDING
FOR
6 retary is authorized to provide funding through the Serv7 ice, Indian Tribes, and Tribal Organizations to establish
8 dialysis programs, including funding to purchase dialysis
9 equipment and provide necessary staffing.
10
OF THE
SECRETARY.The Sec-
13
14
15
tes;
16
17
18
19
area; and
20
21
22
23
S 1057 IS
103
100
1
2
(b) CONTENTS
OF
AGREEMENTS.An agreement
19
20
21
22
23
section;
24
25
26
104
101
1
ity).
9 provided for under this section shall meet the require10 ments for nursing facilities under section 1919 of the So11 cial Security Act.
12
13 vide such technical and other assistance as may be nec14 essary to enable applicants to comply with the provisions
15 of this section.
16
17
(e) USE
TIES.The
OF
EXISTING
OR
UNDERUSED FACILI-
22 make funding available for research to further the per23 formance of the health service responsibilities of Indian
24 Health Programs. The Secretary shall also, to the maxi25 mum extent practicable, coordinate departmental research
S 1057 IS
105
102
1 resources and activities to address relevant Indian Health
2 Program research needs. Tribal Health Programs shall be
3 given an equal opportunity to compete for, and receive,
4 research funds under this section. This funding may be
5 used for both clinical and nonclinical research.
6
7
8
ING.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
such Act.
19
20
21
22
S 1057 IS
106
103
1 health care services provided (either through direct or con2 tract care or through a contract or compact under the In3 dian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act
4 (25 U.S.C. 450 et seq.)) under this Act
5
portation is infeasible;
10
11
12
13
14
15
S 1057 IS
107
104
1
(b) FUNCTIONS
OF
2 and upon the request of Indian Tribes, Tribal Organiza3 tions, and Urban Indian Organizations, each Service Area
4 epidemiology center established under this subsection
5 shall, with respect to such Service Area
6
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
epidemiological data;
19
20
21
22
23
ans;
24
25
S 1057 IS
108
105
1
and
(d) FUNDING
FOR
13 make funding available to Indian Tribes, Tribal Organiza14 tions, and Urban Indian Organizations to conduct epide15 miological studies of Indian communities.
16
17
18
PROGRAMS.
(a) FUNDING
FOR
DEVELOPMENT
OF
PROGRAMS.
S 1057 IS
109
106
1 grade 12 in schools for the benefit of Indian and Urban
2 Indian children.
3
(b) USE
OF
9
10
11
Integrating
school-based,
community-
12
13
efforts.
14
15
16
17
18
community.
19
20
21
22
23
24
grams.
(8) Developing chronic disease prevention programs.
S 1057 IS
110
107
1
2
3
4
5
6
10
11
12
priate.
13
14 Secretary, acting through the Service, shall provide tech15 nical assistance to Indian Tribes, Tribal Organizations,
16 and Urban Indian Organizations in the development of
17 comprehensive health education plans and the dissemina18 tion of comprehensive health education materials and in19 formation on existing health programs and resources.
20
21
(d) CRITERIA
PLICATIONS.The
FOR
REVIEW
AND
APPROVAL
OF
AP-
22 and in consultation with Indian Tribes, Tribal Organiza23 tions, and Urban Indian Organizations, shall establish cri24 teria for the review and approval of applications for fund25 ing provided pursuant to this section.
S 1057 IS
111
108
1
(e) DEVELOPMENT
OF
PROGRAM
FOR
BIA FUNDED
2 SCHOOLS.
3
(1) IN
GENERAL.The
10
11
12
FOR
PROGRAMS.Such
13
14
15
16
17
18
grams;
19
20
21
22
23
(3) DUTIES
24
OF THE SECRETARY.The
S 1057 IS
Sec-
112
109
1
2
community; and
7
8
9
10
11 through the Service, is authorized to establish and admin12 ister a program to provide funding to Indian Tribes, Trib13 al Organizations, and Urban Indian Organizations for in14 novative mental and physical disease prevention and
15 health promotion and treatment programs for Indian and
16 Urban Indian preadolescent and adolescent youths.
17
18
19
USES.Funds
made available
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
113
110
1
(2) PROHIBITED
USE.Funds
made available
(c) DUTIES
OF THE
SECRETARY.The Secretary
7 shall
8
10
11
12
adolescents;
13
14
15
16
17
18
models.
19
(d) CRITERIA
20
PLICATIONS.The
FOR
REVIEW
AND
APPROVAL
OF
AP-
21 Tribes, Tribal Organizations, and Urban Indian Organiza22 tions, shall establish criteria for the review and approval
23 of applications or proposals under this section.
S 1057 IS
114
111
1
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
fessionals.
23
24
25
(HCV).
S 1057 IS
115
112
1
5 dian Tribes, Tribal Organizations, and Urban Indian Or6 ganizations receiving funding under this section are en7 couraged to coordinate their activities with the Centers for
8 Disease Control and Prevention and State and local health
9 agencies.
10
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
ans.
21
22
23
ICES.
24 through the Service, Indian Tribes, and Tribal Organiza25 tions, may provide funding under this Act to meet the ob-
S 1057 IS
116
113
1 jectives set forth in section 3 through health care-related
2 services and programs not otherwise described in this Act,
3 including
4
9
10
(b) SERVICES
SONS.Subject
TO
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
117
114
1
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
118
115
1
ment.
3
4
5 dian Tribes, Tribal Organizations, and Urban Indian Or6 ganizations, shall monitor and improve the quality of
7 health care for Indian women of all ages through the plan8 ning and delivery of programs administered by the Service,
9 in order to improve and enhance the treatment models of
10 care for Indian women.
11
12
13
ARDS.
(a) STUDIES
AND
MONITORING.The Secretary
S 1057 IS
119
116
1
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
chain;
19
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
120
117
1
9 such studies, the Secretary and the Service shall take into
10 account the results of such studies and, in consultation
11 with Indian Tribes and Tribal Organizations, develop
12 health care plans to address the health problems studied
13 under subsection (a). The plans shall include
14
15
(1) methods for diagnosing and treating Indians currently exhibiting such health problems;
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
121
118
1
(c) SUBMISSION
GRESS.The
OF
REPORT
AND
PLAN
TO
CON-
MEMBERS.There
is es-
17
18
19
ignees):
20
21
22
Protection Agency.
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
122
119
1
Services.
Service.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
minimized or reduced.
17
(3) CHAIRMAN;
MEETINGS.The
Secretary of
18
19
20
21
TO
CERTAIN EMPLOYEES.
24
S 1057 IS
123
120
1
condition;
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
LIVERY AREA.
S 1057 IS
124
121
1 contract health care services to members of federally rec2 ognized Indian Tribes of Arizona.
3
(b) MAINTENANCE
OF
SERVICES.The Service
4 shall not curtail any health care services provided to Indi5 ans residing on reservations in the State of Arizona if such
6 curtailment is due to the provision of contract services in
7 such State pursuant to the designation of such State as
8 a contract health service delivery area pursuant to sub9 section (a).
10
11
12
S 1057 IS
125
122
1
GRAM.
4 thorized to fund a program using the California Rural In5 dian Health Board (hereafter in this section referred to
6 as the CRIHB) as a contract care intermediary to im7 prove the accessibility of health services to California Indi8 ans.
9
10 shall enter into an agreement with the CRIHB to reim11 burse the CRIHB for costs (including reasonable adminis12 trative costs) incurred pursuant to this section, in provid13 ing medical treatment under contract to California Indi14 ans described in section 806(a) throughout the California
15 contract health services delivery area described in section
16 218 with respect to high cost contract care cases.
17
(d) LIMITATION
ON
126
123
1 made available to the California contract health service de2 livery area for a fiscal year.
3
11
12
DELIVERY AREA.
13 Alameda, Contra Costa, Los Angeles, Marin, Orange, Sac14 ramento, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Kern,
15 Merced, Monterey, Napa, San Benito, San Joaquin, San
16 Luis Obispo, Santa Cruz, Solano, Stanislaus, and Ven17 tura, shall be designated as a contract health service deliv18 ery area by the Service for the purpose of providing con19 tract health services to California Indians. However, any
20 of the counties listed herein may only be included in the
21 contract health services delivery area if funding is specifi22 cally provided by the Service for such services in those
23 counties.
S 1057 IS
127
124
1
2
3
(a) AUTHORIZATION
FOR
SERVICES.The Sec-
(b) NO EXPANSION
OF
ELIGIBILITY.Nothing in
18
19
TRIBAL ORGANIZATIONS.
128
125
1 Tribal Health Program performs the services described in
2 its contract or compact under the Indian Self-Determina3 tion and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450 et
4 seq.).
5
6
7
(a) DEADLINE
FOR
(b) EFFECT
OF
20 Service fails to respond to a notification of a claim in ac21 cordance with subsection (a), the Service shall accept as
22 valid the claim submitted by the provider of a contract
23 care service.
S 1057 IS
129
126
1
(c) DEADLINE
FOR
PAYMENT
OF
VALID CLAIM.
11 contract care provider and any patient who receives con12 tract health care services authorized by the Service that
13 such patient is not liable for the payment of any charges
14 or costs associated with the provision of such services not
15 later than 5 business days after receipt of a notification
16 of a claim by a provider of contract care services.
17
S 1057 IS
130
127
1
TITLE IIIFACILITIES
3
4
(a)
PREREQUISITES
FOR
EXPENDITURE
OF
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
(b) CLOSURES.
S 1057 IS
131
128
1
REQUIRED.Notwithstand-
(1) EVALUATION
10
facility;
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
(2) EXCEPTION
FOR
CERTAIN
TEMPORARY
24
CLOSURES.Paragraph
25
S 1057 IS
132
129
1
(1) IN
GENERAL.
(A)
ESTABLISHMENT.The
Secretary,
shall
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
(B) PRIORITY
OF
CERTAIN
PROJECTS
18
PROTECTED.The
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
133
130
1
(2) REPORT;
CONTENTS.The
Secretary shall
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
(B)
Health
care
facilities
lists,
including
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
ment);
S 1057 IS
134
131
1
facilities; and
priority.
10
11
12
(3) REQUIREMENTS
13
PORTS.In
14
15
16
17
18
19
Organizations; and
20
21
22
23
24
25
facilities.
S 1057 IS
135
132
1
(4) CRITERIA
(5) NEEDS
10
AGREEMENTS.The
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
(1) INITIAL
REPORT.In
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
136
133
1
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
137
134
1
tem.
priority system.
10
11 under the Act of November 2, 1921 (25 U.S.C. 13) (com12 monly known as the Snyder Act), for the planning, de13 sign, construction, or renovation of health facilities for the
14 benefit of 1 or more Indian Tribes shall be subject to the
15 provisions of the Indian Self-Determination and Edu16 cation Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450 et seq.).
17
S 1057 IS
138
135
1
2
(1) The provision of sanitation facilities is primarily a health consideration and function.
facilities.
10
11
health measures.
12
13
(4) Many Indian homes and Indian communities still lack sanitation facilities.
14
15
16
17
18
(b) FACILITIES
AND
SERVICES.In furtherance of
S 1057 IS
139
136
1
community.
10
11
12
13
14
ties.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
of sanitation facilities.
23
24 sion of law
S 1057 IS
140
137
1
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
velopment;
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
141
138
1
dian homes;
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
142
139
1
AND
MAINTENANCE
S 1057 IS
143
140
1 sanitation facility, then the Secretary is authorized to as2 sist the Indian Tribe, Tribal Organization, or Indian com3 munity in the resolution of the problem on a short-term
4 basis through cooperation with the emergency coordinator
5 or by providing operation, management, and maintenance
6 service.
7
ON
EQUAL
14
15
(h) REPORT.
16
(1) REQUIRED;
CONTENTS.The
Secretary, in
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
forth
S 1057 IS
144
141
1
2
3
4
community;
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
dian homes.
22
23
24
25
section 802.
S 1057 IS
145
142
1
(3) UNIFORM
METHODOLOGY.The
methodol-
munities.
(4) SANITATION
DEFICIENCY LEVELS.For
10
11
determined as follows:
12
13
14
or Indian community
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
ciencies relate to
S 1057 IS
146
143
1
into compliance;
10
11
12
ties.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
S 1057 IS
147
144
1
available.
10
ponent failure; or
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
age) disposal.
18
(1) INDIAN
COMMUNITY.The
term Indian
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
148
145
1
(2)
SANITATION
FACILITIES.The
terms
frastructure).
7
8
S 1057 IS
149
146
1 whether the Indian or Indian firm will be deficient with
2 respect to
3
(2) equipment;
10
performance.
11
12
(1) IN
GENERAL.For
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
150
147
1
or renovation.
10
11
employees.
12
13
14
OVATION.
S 1057 IS
151
148
1
(1) IN
GENERAL.The
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
152
149
1
(2)
the
expansion,
renovation,
or
modernization
10
11
12
(e) CLOSURE
OR
CONVERSION
OF
FACILITIES.If
S 1057 IS
153
150
1 recover from the United States an amount which bears
2 the same ratio to the value of such facility at the time
3 of such cessation as the value of such expansion, renova4 tion, or modernization (less the total amount of any funds
5 provided specifically for such facility under any Federal
6 program that were expended for such expansion, renova7 tion, or modernization) bore to the value of such facility
8 at the time of the completion of such expansion, renova9 tion, or modernization.
10
11
12
13
(a) FUNDING.
14
(1) IN
GENERAL.The
Secretary, acting
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
154
151
1
ing facility.
(2) AGREEMENT
REQUIRED.Funding
under
10
11
(1) ALLOWABLE
USES.Funding
provided
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
155
152
1
807(c)(2); and
10
11
807(c)(2).
12
(2) ADDITIONAL
ALLOWABLE USE.The
Sec-
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
(3) USE
24
COSTS.Funding
25
S 1057 IS
156
153
1
10
11
lation.
12
(c) FUNDING.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
facility;
S 1057 IS
157
154
1
10
dian
11
demonstrate
Tribes
12
13
and
Tribal
Organizations
that
14
15
services.
16
(3) PEER
REVIEW PANELS.The
Secretary
17
18
19
20
21
22
(a)(1).
23
(d) REVERSION
OF
S 1057 IS
158
155
1 pletion of the construction, expansion, or modernization
2 carried out with such funds, to be used for the purposes
3 of providing health care services to eligible Indians, all of
4 the right, title, and interest in and to such facility (or por5 tion thereof) shall transfer to the United States unless
6 otherwise negotiated by the Service and the Indian Tribe
7 or Tribal Organization.
8
15
16
TION PROJECT.
17 The Secretary, acting through the Service, and in con18 sultation with Indian Tribes and Tribal Organizations, is
19 authorized to enter into construction agreements under
20 the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance
21 Act (25 U.S.C. 450 et seq.) with Indian Tribes or Tribal
22 Organizations for the purpose of carrying out a health
23 care delivery demonstration project to test alternative
24 means of delivering health care and services to Indians
25 through facilities.
S 1057 IS
159
156
1
(b) USE
OF
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
S 1057 IS
160
157
1
program.
project.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17 provide for the establishment of peer review panels, as nec18 essary, to review and evaluate applications using the cri19 teria developed pursuant to subsection (d).
20
21 applications for demonstration projects in each of the fol22 lowing Service Units to the extent that such applications
23 are timely filed and meet the criteria specified in sub24 section (d):
25
S 1057 IS
161
158
1
10 provide such technical and other assistance as may be nec11 essary to enable applicants to comply with the provisions
12 of this section.
13
(h) SERVICE
TO INELIGIBLE
PERSONS.Subject to
S 1057 IS
162
159
1 retary uses in evaluating facilities operated directly by the
2 Service.
3
OF
FACILITIES.The
4 Secretary shall ensure that the planning, design, construc5 tion, renovation, and expansion needs of Service and non6 Service facilities which are the subject of a contract or
7 compact under the Indian Self-Determination and Edu8 cation Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450 et seq.) for health
9 services are fully and equitably integrated into the imple10 mentation of the health care delivery demonstration
11 projects under this section.
12
13
14 reau of Indian Affairs and all other agencies and depart15 ments of the United States are authorized to transfer, at
16 no cost, land and improvements to the Service for the pro17 vision of health care services. The Secretary is authorized
18 to accept such land and improvements for such purposes.
19
20
21 enter into leases, contracts, and other agreements with In22 dian Tribes and Tribal Organizations which hold (1) title
23 to, (2) a leasehold interest in, or (3) a beneficial interest
24 in (when title is held by the United States in trust for
25 the benefit of an Indian Tribe) facilities used or to be used
S 1057 IS
163
160
1 for the administration and delivery of health services by
2 an Indian Health Program. Such leases, contracts, or
3 agreements may include provisions for construction or ren4 ovation and provide for compensation to the Indian Tribe
5 or Tribal Organization of rental and other costs consistent
6 with section 105(l) of the Indian Self-Determination and
7 Education Assistance Act and regulations thereunder.
8
9
10
LOAN REPAYMENT.
18
19
20
21
22
23
S 1057 IS
164
161
1
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
fund;
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
165
162
1
propriate;
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18 the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Indian Af19 fairs of the Senate and the Committee on Resources and
20 the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House
21 of Representatives a report that describes
22
23
S 1057 IS
166
163
1
the study.
4
5
9
10
S 1057 IS
167
164
1
venture project.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
(d) BREACH
OF
24 Tribal Organization that has entered into a written agree25 ment with the Secretary under this section, and that
S 1057 IS
168
165
1 breaches or terminates without cause such agreement,
2 shall be liable to the United States for the amount that
3 has been paid to the Indian Tribe or Tribal Organization,
4 or paid to a third party on the Indian Tribes or Tribal
5 Organizations behalf, under the agreement. The Sec6 retary has the right to recover tangible property (including
7 supplies) and equipment, less depreciation, and any funds
8 expended for operations and maintenance under this sec9 tion. The preceding sentence does not apply to any funds
10 expended for the delivery of health care services, person11 nel, or staffing.
12
(e) RECOVERY
FOR
13 Tribal Organization that has entered into a written agree14 ment with the Secretary under this subsection shall be en15 titled to recover from the United States an amount that
16 is proportional to the value of such facility if, at any time
17 within the 10-year term of the agreement, the Service
18 ceases to use the facility or otherwise breaches the agree19 ment.
20
S 1057 IS
169
166
1
2
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
170
167
1
CARE FACILITIES.
4 President, for inclusion in the report required to be trans5 mitted to Congress under section 801, a report which iden6 tifies the backlog of maintenance and repair work required
7 at both Service and tribal health care facilities, including
8 new health care facilities expected to be in operation in
9 the next fiscal year. The report shall also identify the need
10 for renovation and expansion of existing facilities to sup11 port the growth of health care programs.
12
(b) MAINTENANCE
OF
NEWLY CONSTRUCTED
13 SPACE.The Secretary, acting through the Service, is au14 thorized to expend maintenance and improvement funds
15 to support maintenance of newly constructed space only
16 if such space falls within the approved supportable space
17 allocation for the Indian Tribe or Tribal Organization.
18 Supportable space allocation shall be defined through the
19 negotiated rulemaking process provided for under section
20 802.
21
171
168
1 maximum renovation cost threshold. The maximum ren2 ovation cost threshold shall be determined through the ne3 gotiated rulemaking process provided for under section
4 802.
5
6
7
QUARTERS.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
ing objectives:
22
23
24
thereof.
S 1057 IS
172
169
1
(3)
EQUITABLE
FUNDING.Any
quarters
10
11
12
13
ported programs.
14
(4) NOTICE
OF
RATE
CHANGE.A
Tribal
15
16
17
18
rental rates.
19
20
(1) IN
GENERAL.Notwithstanding
any other
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
173
170
1
ployees.
10
11
12
deduction or otherwise.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
mine.
24
(2) RETROCESSION
25
OF
AUTHORITY.If
S 1057 IS
174
171
1
retrocede; or
10
11
Program.
12
(c) RATES
IN
13 Health Program, pursuant to authority granted in sub14 section (a), establishes rental rates for federally owned
15 quarters provided to a Federal employee in Alaska, such
16 rents may be based on the cost of comparable private rent17 al housing in the nearest established community with a
18 year-round population of 1,500 or more individuals.
19
20
21
QUIREMENT.
S 1057 IS
175
172
1
(b) EFFECT
OF
13 term Buy American Act means title III of the Act enti14 tled An Act making appropriations for the Treasury and
15 Post Office Departments for the fiscal year ending June
16 30, 1934, and for other purposes, approved March 3,
17 1933 (41 U.S.C. 10a et seq.).
18
19
S 1057 IS
176
173
1 Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450 et seq.). Receipt of such
2 funds shall have no effect on the priorities established pur3 suant to section 301.
4
(d) ESTABLISHMENT
OF
STANDARDS.The Sec-
S 1057 IS
177
174
1
(a) DISREGARD
MEDICARE, MEDICAID,
OF
AND
FUND.Notwithstanding
any
25
26
178
175
1
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Act.
22
(2) DIRECT
PAYMENT
OPTION.Paragraph
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
179
176
1
(1) IN
GENERAL.A
10
11
12
REIMBURSEMENT.
(A) USE
OF FUNDS.Each
Tribal Health
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
180
177
1
10
11
12
13
(C) IDENTIFICATION
OF SOURCE OF PAY-
14
MENTS.If
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
181
178
1
payments.
(3) EXAMINATION
AND IMPLEMENTATION OF
CHANGES.The
10
11
12
13
14
(4) WITHDRAWAL
FROM PROGRAM.A
Tribal
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
182
179
1
ICE,
6
7
INDIAN
TRIBES,
AND
TRIBAL
ORGANIZA-
TRIBAL ORGANIZA-
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
S 1057 IS
183
180
1 shall include requirements that the Indian Tribe or Tribal
2 Organization successfully undertake
3
4
5
6
(1) to determine the population of Indians eligible for the benefits described in subsection (a);
(2) to educate Indians with respect to the benefits available under the respective programs;
10
11
12
13
14
15
ROLLMENT OF
TO
IMPROVING EN-
16 PROGRAMS.
17
(1) AGREEMENTS
18
PROVE
19
TIONS.
20
RECEIPT
(A)
AND
OF
AUTHORIZATION.The
APPLICA-
Secretary,
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
184
181
1
nization.
(B) REIMBURSEMENT
OF COSTS.Such
10
11
12
13
Organization.
14
(C) PROCESSING
CLARIFIED.In
this
15
16
17
(2) AGREEMENTS
18
19
(A) IN
GENERAL.In
order to improve
20
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
185
182
1
vided.
10
11
12
13
tles.
14
15 acting through the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Serv16 ices, shall take such steps as are necessary to facilitate
17 cooperation with, and agreements between, States and the
18 Service, Indian Tribes, Tribal Organizations, or Urban In19 dian Organizations.
20
21
22
(e) APPLICATION
TO
TIONS.
(1) IN
GENERAL.The
provisions of sub-
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
186
183
1
7
8
(A) consistent with the requirements imposed by the Secretary under subsection (b);
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
(a) RIGHT
OF
RECOVERY.Except as provided in
S 1057 IS
187
184
1 same extent that such individual, or any nongovernmental
2 provider of such services, would be eligible to receive dam3 ages, reimbursement, or indemnification for such charges
4 or expenses if
5
6
or expenses.
10
(b) LIMITATIONS
ON
15
16
plan or program.
17
(c) NONAPPLICATION
OF
S 1057 IS
188
185
1 United States, an Indian Tribe, or Tribal Organization
2 under subsection (a).
3
(e) ENFORCEMENT.
(1) IN
GENERAL.The
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
such individual, or
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
189
186
1
7 tion by the governing body of an Indian Tribe for the pe8 riod of such authorization (which may not be for a period
9 of more than 1 year and which may be revoked at any
10 time upon written notice by the governing body to the
11 Service), the United States shall not have a right of recov12 ery under this section if the injury, illness, or disability
13 for which health services were provided is covered under
14 a self-insurance plan funded by an Indian Tribe, Tribal
15 Organization, or Urban Indian Organization. Where such
16 authorization is provided, the Service may receive and ex17 pend such amounts for the provision of additional health
18 services consistent with such authorization.
19
(g) COSTS
AND
20 brought to enforce the provisions of this section, a prevail21 ing plaintiff shall be awarded its reasonable attorneys fees
22 and costs of litigation.
23
24
(h) NONAPPLICATION
MENTS.An
OF
S 1057 IS
190
187
1 other health care plan or program (under the Social Secu2 rity Act or otherwise) may not deny a claim for benefits
3 submitted by the Service or by an Indian Tribe or Tribal
4 Organization based on the format in which the claim is
5 submitted if such format complies with the format re6 quired for submission of claims under title XVIII of the
7 Social Security Act or recognized under section 1175 of
8 such Act.
9
10
(i) APPLICATION
TIONS.The
TO
(j) STATUTE
OF
LIMITATIONS.The provisions of
S 1057 IS
191
188
1 Tribal law, including medical lien laws and the Federal
2 Medical Care Recovery Act (42 U.S.C. 2651 et seq.).
3
(1) RETENTION
BY PROGRAM.Except
as pro-
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
such purposes.
21
22
(2) PROGRAMS
programs re-
23
24
COVERED.The
25
S 1057 IS
192
189
1
(b) NO OFFSET
OF
S 1057 IS
193
190
1 The purchase of such coverage by an Indian Tribe, Tribal
2 Organization, or Urban Indian Organization may be based
3 on the financial needs of such beneficiaries (as determined
4 by the Indian Tribe or Tribes being served based on a
5 schedule of income levels developed or implemented by
6 such Indian Tribe or Tribes).
7
(b) EXPENSES
FOR
13 be construed as affecting the use of any amounts not re14 ferred to in subsection (a).
15
16
17
18
CIES.
(a) AUTHORITY.
(1) IN
GENERAL.The
19
20
21
22
23
Defense.
24
(2)
25
QUIRED.The
S 1057 IS
CONSULTATION
BY
SECRETARY
RE-
194
191
1
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ans Affairs;
18
19
20
partment of Defense; or
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
195
192
1 ment of Veterans Affairs or the Department of Defense
2 (as the case may be) where services are provided through
3 the Service, an Indian Tribe, or a Tribal Organization to
4 beneficiaries eligible for services from either such Depart5 ment, notwithstanding any other provision of law.
6
17
18
19 tity that is operated by the Service, an Indian Tribe, Trib20 al Organization, or Urban Indian Organization to receive
21 payment or reimbursement from any federally funded
22 health care program for health care services it furnishes
23 to an Indian. Such program must provide that such entity,
24 meeting generally applicable State or other requirements
25 applicable for participation, must be accepted as a pro-
S 1057 IS
196
193
1 vider on the same basis as any other qualified provider,
2 except that any requirement that the entity be licensed
3 or recognized under State or local law to furnish such
4 services shall be deemed to have been met if the entity
5 meets all the applicable standards for such licensure, but
6 the entity need not obtain a license or other documenta7 tion. In determining whether the entity meets such stand8 ards, the absence of licensure of any staff member of the
9 entity may not be taken into account.
10
11
(a)
TRIBAL
TECHNICAL
ADVISORY
GROUP
12 (TTAG).The Secretary shall maintain within the Cen13 ters for Medicaid & Medicare Services (CMS) a Tribal
14 Technical Advisory Group, established in accordance with
15 requirements of the charter dated September 30, 2003,
16 and in such group shall include a representative of the
17 Urban Indian Organizations and the Service. The rep18 resentative of the Urban Indian Organization shall be
19 deemed to be an elected officer of a tribal government for
20 purposes of applying section 204(b) of the Unfunded Man21 dates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1534(b)).
22
23
GENERAL.As
24
25
S 1057 IS
197
194
1
10
11
OF ADVICE.The
process de-
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
(3) PAYMENT
OF EXPENSES.The
reasonable
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
198
195
1
GRAM (SCHIP).
8 PROGRAM PAYMENTS.Subject to the succeeding provi9 sions of this section, a State may provide under its State
10 child health plan under title XXI of the Social Security
11 Act (regardless of whether such plan is implemented under
12 such title, title XIX of such Act, or both) for payments
13 under this section to Indian Health Programs and Urban
14 Indian Organizations operating in the State. Such pay15 ments shall be treated under title XXI of the Social Secu16 rity
Act
as
expenditures
described
in
section
(b) USE
OF
(1) Indians; or
24
25
S 1057 IS
199
196
1
(1) NO
HEALTH PROGRAMS.The
10
11
12
13
14
tion.
15
(2) NO
16
BILITY OF INDIANS.The
17
18
19
20
21
22
(3) LIMITATION
ON ACCEPTANCE OF CON-
TRIBUTIONS.
23
(A) IN
GENERAL.The
24
25
S 1057 IS
200
197
1
Security Act.
(B) CONTRIBUTION
DEFINED.For
pur-
voluntarily.
10
11
(d) APPLICATION
TATION.Payment
OF
S 1057 IS
201
198
1
(1) IN
GENERAL.For
purposes of applying
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
AND
FOR
TRANSACTIONS BETWEEN
22 purposes of applying section 1128B(b) of the Social Secu23 rity Act, the exchange of anything of value between or
24 among the following shall not be treated as remuneration
S 1057 IS
202
199
1 if the exchange arises from or relates to any of the follow2 ing health programs:
3
4
10
11
Urban
12
13
Indian
Organization,
including
patients
14
15
16
services;
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
203
200
1
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
nizations.
17
18
(a)
COINSURANCE,
COPAYMENTS,
AND
(1) PROTECTION
FOR
ELIGIBLE
INDIANS
22
UNDER
23
GRAMS.No
24
S 1057 IS
SOCIAL
SECURITY
ACT
HEALTH
PRO-
204
201
1
(2) PROTECTION
FOR INDIANS.No
Indian
ance.
(3) NO
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
MIUMS.Notwithstanding
payment or
17 or State law, no Indian who is otherwise eligible for serv18 ices under title XIX of the Social Security Act (relating
19 to the medicaid program) or title XXI of such Act (relat20 ing to the State childrens health insurance program) may
21 be charged a premium, enrollment fee, or similar charge
22 as a condition of receiving benefits under the program
23 under the respective title.
24
25
(c) TREATMENT
ICAID
OF
CERTAIN PROPERTY
FOR
MED-
S 1057 IS
205
202
1 of Federal or State law, the following property may not
2 be included when determining eligibility for services under
3 title XIX of the Social Security Act:
4
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
tion.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
206
203
1
(d) CONTINUATION
OF
TIONS OF
(a) PROVISION
OF
SERVICES,
TO
ENROLLEES WITH
BY
ZATIONS.
(1) PAYMENT
21
(A) IN
RULES.
GENERAL.Subject
to subpara-
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
207
204
1
(i) DIRECT
PAYMENT.The
entity
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
ganization.
21
(ii) PAYMENT
THROUGH STATE.If
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
208
205
1
(B) COMPLIANCE
10
PLICABLE REQUIREMENTS.
11
(i) IN
GENERAL.Except
as other-
12
13
under
14
15
16
17
18
services.
19
subparagraph
(A),
(ii) SATISFACTION
OF
the
Indian
CLAIM
RE-
20
QUIREMENT.Any
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
209
206
1
(2) ENROLLEE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
of the entity,
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
the entity.
S 1057 IS
210
207
1
2
(b) OFFERING
DIAN
OF
10
11
12
FOR
(1) ENROLLMENT.
22
(A) LIMITATION
TO INDIANS.An
Indian
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
211
208
1
members.
(B) NO
10
11
(C) DEFAULT
12
(i) IN
ENROLLMENT.
GENERAL.If
such program
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
such clause.
21
(ii) INDIAN
DESCRIBED.An
Indian
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
212
209
1
subparagraph (A).
(D) EXCEPTION
TO STATE LOCK-IN.A
10
11
(2) FLEXIBILITY
IN APPLICATION OF SOL-
12
VENCY.In
13
14
care entity
15
16
17
18
19
20
of that section.
21
(3) EXCEPTIONS
TO ADVANCE DIRECTIVES.
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
213
210
1
formation to Indians.
4
5
(4) FLEXIBILITY
KETING.
10
11
12
13
14
(B) DISTRIBUTION
OF MARKETING MATE-
15
RIALS.The
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
area.
24
provisions
of
section
S 1057 IS
214
211
1 is required to have medical malpractice insurance coverage
2 as a condition of contracting as a provider with a medicaid
3 managed care entity, an Indian Health Program, or an
4 Urban Indian Organization that is a Federally-qualified
5 health center under title XIX of the Social Security Act,
6 that is covered under the Federal Tort Claims Act (28
7 U.S.C. 1346(b), 2671 et seq.) is deemed to satisfy such
8 requirement.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
otherwise.
18
(2) INDIAN
19
TITY.The
20
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
215
212
1
(3) NON-INDIAN
ENTITY.The
8
9
(4)
COVERED
SERVICES.The
MEDICAID
MANAGED
CARE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
(5) MEDICAID
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ITY STUDY.
S 1057 IS
216
213
1 as a State for the purposes of title XIX of the Social Secu2 rity Act, to provide services to Indians living within the
3 boundaries of the Navajo Nation through an entity estab4 lished having the same authority and performing the same
5 functions as single-State medicaid agencies responsible for
6 the administration of the State plan under title XIX of
7 the Social Security Act.
8
11
12
13
14
15
16
Utah;
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
217
214
1
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
218
215
1
4
5
15
16
DIAN ORGANIZATIONS.
S 1057 IS
219
216
1 into which the Secretary enters with, or in any grant the
2 Secretary makes to, any Urban Indian Organization pur3 suant to this title.
4
6
7
(a) REQUIREMENTS
TRACTS.Under
FOR
GRANTS
AND
CON-
16
17
18
19
20
21
centers;
22
23
24
centers;
S 1057 IS
220
217
1
to Urban Indians;
10
11
18
19
volved;
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
221
218
1
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
(c) ACCESS
TO
HEALTH PROMOTION
AND
DISEASE
OR SERVICES PROVIDED.The
S 1057 IS
222
219
1
10
(1) ACCESS
OR SERVICES PROVIDED.The
11
12
13
14
15
16
(2) ASSESSMENT
REQUIRED.Except
as pro-
17
18
19
20
21
ing:
22
23
S 1057 IS
223
220
1
lation.
4
5
(3) PURPOSES
may be
10
11
OF GRANTS.Grants
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
S 1057 IS
224
221
1
4
5
OR SERVICES PROVIDED.The
10
11
12
Indians.
13
(2) EVALUATION
REQUIRED.Except
as pro-
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
(3) PURPOSES
may be
24
25
OF GRANTS.Grants
S 1057 IS
225
222
1
child protection.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
abuse).
18
(4)
19
GRANTS.In
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
CONSIDERATIONS
WHEN
MAKING
226
223
1
if any;
8
9
graph (2).
(g)
OTHER
GRANTS.The
Secretary,
acting
16
17
(a) GRANTS
AND
CONTRACTS AUTHORIZED.
S 1057 IS
227
224
1
(c) GRANT
AND
CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS.Any
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
228
225
1
5 any contract entered into or grant made under this sec6 tion.
7
8
(a) PROCEDURES
FOR
EVALUATIONS.The Sec-
9 retary, acting through the Service, shall develop proce10 dures to evaluate compliance with grant requirements and
11 compliance with and performance of contracts entered into
12 by Urban Indian Organizations under this title. Such pro13 cedures shall include provisions for carrying out the re14 quirements of this section.
15
(1) acting through the Service, conduct an annual onsite evaluation of the organization; or
S 1057 IS
229
226
1
ANCE.If,
9 this section, the Secretary determines that an Urban In10 dian Organization has not complied with the requirements
11 of a grant or complied with or satisfactorily performed a
12 contract under section 503, the Secretary shall, prior to
13 renewing such contract or grant, attempt to resolve with
14 the organization the areas of noncompliance or unsatisfac15 tory performance and modify the contract or grant to pre16 vent future occurrences of noncompliance or unsatisfac17 tory performance. If the Secretary determines that the
18 noncompliance or unsatisfactory performance cannot be
19 resolved and prevented in the future, the Secretary shall
20 not renew the contract or grant with the organization and
21 is authorized to enter into a contract or make a grant
22 under section 503 with another Urban Indian Organiza23 tion which is situated in the same Urban Center as the
24 Urban Indian Organization whose contract or grant is not
25 renewed under this section.
S 1057 IS
230
227
1
(d) CONSIDERATIONS
FOR
RENEWALS.In deter-
10
OR
GRANTS.
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
231
228
1
10
11
12
13
such funds.
14
(c) REVISION
OR
AMENDMENT
OF
CONTRACTS.
(d) FAIR
AND
ANCE.Contracts
UNIFORM SERVICES
AND
ASSIST-
S 1057 IS
232
229
1
2
10
11
12
13
14
503(a)(5).
(2) Information on activities conducted by the
organization pursuant to the contract or grant.
(3) An accounting of the amounts and purpose
for which Federal funds were expended.
15
16
17
18
(c) COSTS
OF
233
230
1
2
3
4
10 Service, may make grants to contractors or grant recipi11 ents under this title for the lease, purchase, renovation,
12 construction, or expansion of facilities, including leased fa13 cilities, in order to assist such contractors or grant recipi14 ents in complying with applicable licensure or certification
15 requirements.
16
S 1057 IS
234
231
1
4
5
dian Organizations.
SEC. 511. GRANTS FOR ALCOHOL AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
6
7
RELATED SERVICES.
23
24
25
grant.
S 1057 IS
235
232
1
grant-by-grant basis.
(d) ALLOCATION
OF
8 develop a methodology for allocating grants made pursu9 ant to this section based on the criteria established pursu10 ant to subsection (c).
11
TO
17
18
PROJECTS.
23
24
25
and
S 1057 IS
236
233
1
Act.
6
7
(a) GRANTS
AND
CONTRACTS.The Secretary,
(b) USE
OF
S 1057 IS
237
234
1
5
6
TIONS.
(b) DEFINITION
OF
CONSULTATION.For purposes
10 of subsection (a), consultation is the open and free ex11 change of information and opinions which leads to mutual
12 understanding and comprehension and which emphasizes
13 trust, respect, and shared responsibility.
14
15
S 1057 IS
238
235
1 in carrying out the contract or agreement. After Septem2 ber 30, 2003, any civil action or proceeding involving such
3 claims brought hereafter against any Urban Indian Orga4 nization or any employee of such Urban Indian Organiza5 tion covered by this provision shall be deemed to be an
6 action against the United States and will be defended by
7 the Attorney General and be afforded the full protection
8 and coverage of the Federal Tort Claims Act (28 U.S.C.
9 1346(b), 2671 et seq.). Future coverage under that Act
10 shall be contingent on cooperation of the Urban Indian
11 Organization with the Attorney General in prosecuting
12 past claims.
13
14 CONTRACT
OR
OF
20
ONSTRATION.
21
(a) CONSTRUCTION
AND
OPERATION.The Sec-
22 retary, acting through the Service, through grant or con23 tract, is authorized to fund the construction and operation
24 of at least 2 residential treatment centers in each State
25 described in subsection (b) to demonstrate the provision
S 1057 IS
239
236
1 of alcohol and substance abuse treatment services to
2 Urban Indian youth in a culturally competent residential
3 setting.
4
(b) DEFINITION
OF
10
11
Indian youth.
12
13
14
SOURCES OF SUPPLY.
15 ing through the Service, shall allow an Urban Indian Or16 ganization that has entered into a contract or received a
17 grant pursuant to this title, in carrying out such contract
18 or grant, to use existing facilities and all equipment there19 in or pertaining thereto and other personal property
20 owned by the Federal Government within the Secretarys
21 jurisdiction under such terms and conditions as may be
22 agreed upon for their use and maintenance.
23
S 1057 IS
240
237
1 ant to this title any personal or real property determined
2 to be excess to the needs of the Service or the General
3 Services Administration for purposes of carrying out the
4 contract or grant.
5
(c) ACQUISITION
OF
PROPERTY
FOR
DONATION.
S 1057 IS
241
238
1
2
AGENCY
FOR
3 poses of section 501 of title 40, United States Code, (relat4 ing to Federal sources of supply, including lodging provid5 ers, airlines, and other transportation providers), an
6 Urban Indian Organization that has entered into a con7 tract or received a grant pursuant to this title shall be
8 deemed an executive agency when carrying out such con9 tract or grant.
10
11
12
(c) ESTABLISHMENT
OF
CRITERIA.The Secretary
23 shall establish criteria for the grants made under sub24 section (a) relating to
S 1057 IS
242
239
1
2
served;
10
11
12
13
grant; and
14
15
16
17
18
TO
25 enter into contracts with, and make grants to, Urban In-
S 1057 IS
243
240
1 dian Organizations for the employment of Indians trained
2 as health service providers through the Community Health
3 Representatives Program under section 109 in the provi4 sion of health care, health promotion, and disease preven5 tion services to Urban Indians.
6
7
(a) REQUIREMENTS
FOR
REGULATIONS.The Sec-
8 retary may promulgate regulations to implement the provi9 sions of this title in accordance with the following:
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
S 1057 IS
244
241
1
2
10
TITLE VIORGANIZATIONAL
IMPROVEMENTS
11
12
13
SERVICE.
14
(a) ESTABLISHMENT.
15
(1) IN
GENERAL.In
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Service.
23
(2)
ASSISTANT
SECRETARY
OF
INDIAN
24
HEALTH.The
25
26
245
242
1
10
11
12
13
(4) ADVOCACY
AND CONSULTATION.The
po-
14
15
16
17
dian Tribes
18
19
(A) facilitate advocacy for the development of appropriate Indian health policy; and
20
21
22
S 1057 IS
246
243
1
2 Health shall
3
10
11
12
for Indians;
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
U.S.C. 13);
20
21
22
23
S 1057 IS
247
244
1
seq.);
dian health;
10
11
12
Service;
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
(d) AUTHORITY.
S 1057 IS
248
245
1
(1) IN
GENERAL.The
Secretary, acting
authority
10
11
12
13
(2) PERSONNEL
ACTIONS.Notwithstanding
14
15
16
17
18
19
subsection (a).
20
21 the Indian Health Service in any other Federal law, Exec22 utive order, rule, regulation, or delegation of authority, or
23 in any document of or relating to the Director of the In24 dian Health Service, shall be deemed to refer to the Assist25 ant Secretary.
S 1057 IS
249
246
1
2
3
4
TEM.
(a) ESTABLISHMENT.
(1) IN
GENERAL.The
(2) REQUIREMENTS
OF SYSTEM.The
infor-
include
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Service;
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
OF
SYSTEMS
TO
TRIBES
AND
ORGA-
250
247
1 Health Program automated management information sys2 tems which
3
of the Service.
(c) ACCESS
TO
RECORDS.Notwithstanding any
S 1057 IS
251
248
TITLE VIIBEHAVIORAL
HEALTH PROGRAMS
4
5
MENT SERVICES.
6 follows:
7
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
ices.
23
24
25
252
249
1
10
11
12
13
paragraph (2).
14
(b) PLANS.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
253
250
1
illness or behavior; or
behavior.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
(2) NATIONAL
CLEARINGHOUSE.The
Sec-
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
254
251
1
(3) TECHNICAL
ASSISTANCE.The
Secretary
10
(1) COMPREHENSIVE
15
continuum
16
provides
17
of
CARE.A
behavioral
health
comprehensive
care
which
18
vention,
19
aftercare;
outpatient,
and
behavioral
health
20
21
22
23
S 1057 IS
255
252
1
and
8
9
CARE.Behavioral
health services
10
11
12
13
havioral intervention;
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
256
253
1
(3) ADULT
health services
5
6
CARE.Behavioral
10
11
12
morbidity;
13
14
15
16
17
disorder; and
18
19
20
(4) FAMILY
21
24
25
health services
22
23
CARE.Behavioral
S 1057 IS
257
254
1
abuse issues.
(5) ELDER
CARE.Behavioral
health services
aftercare;
10
11
12
13
morbidity;
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
258
255
1
(2) TECHNICAL
ASSISTANCE.At
the request
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
(e) COORDINATION
24
ICES.The
FOR
AVAILABILITY
OF
SERV-
S 1057 IS
259
256
1 tions, shall coordinate behavioral health planning, to the
2 extent feasible, with other Federal agencies and with State
3 agencies, to encourage comprehensive behavioral health
4 services for Indians regardless of their place of residence.
5
16
17
S 1057 IS
260
257
1
ans.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
261
258
1
including
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
services.
24
25
S 1057 IS
262
259
1
10
tions.
11
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
263
260
1
6 the Service, and the Secretary of the Interior shall, in de7 veloping the memoranda of agreement under subsection
8 (a), consult with and solicit the comments from
9
10
(2) Indians;
11
12
13
14
15 ment entered into or renewed (and amendments or modi16 fications thereto) under subsection (a) shall be published
17 in the Federal Register. At the same time as publication
18 in the Federal Register, the Secretary shall provide a copy
19 of such memoranda, amendment, or modification to each
20 Indian Tribe, Tribal Organization, and Urban Indian Or21 ganization.
22
23
24
(a) ESTABLISHMENT.
S 1057 IS
264
261
1
(1) IN
GENERAL.The
Secretary, acting
behavioral
7
8
health,
prevention,
treatment,
and
10
11
treatment;
12
13
14
15
16
17
nel;
18
19
20
21
and
22
23
POPULATIONS.The
target popu-
24
25
S 1057 IS
265
262
1
(1) IN
GENERAL.The
Secretary, acting
10
11
OF ASSISTANCE.In
carrying
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
S 1057 IS
266
263
1
treatment services.
6 out subsection (a), the Secretary, acting through the Serv7 ice, Indian Tribes, and Tribal Organizations, shall provide
8 high-standard paraprofessional training in mental health
9 care necessary to provide quality care to the Indian com10 munities to be served. Such training shall be based upon
11 a curriculum developed or approved by the Secretary
12 which combines education in the theory of mental health
13 care with supervised practical experience in the provision
14 of such care.
15
16
(c) SUPERVISION
CIANS.The
AND
EVALUATION
OF
TECHNI-
S 1057 IS
267
264
1
SEC.
705.
2
3
LICENSING
REQUIREMENT
FOR
MENTAL
(b) USE
OF
24
25
26
268
265
1
(d) EARMARK
OF
(a) DETOXIFICATION
AND
REHABILITATION.The
18 Secretary, acting through the Service, consistent with sec19 tion 701, shall develop and implement a program for acute
20 detoxification and treatment for Indian youths, including
21 behavioral health services. The program shall include re22 gional treatment centers designed to include detoxification
23 and rehabilitation for both sexes on a referral basis and
24 programs developed and implemented by Indian Tribes or
25 Tribal Organizations at the local level under the Indian
S 1057 IS
269
266
1 Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act. Re2 gional centers shall be integrated with the intake and re3 habilitation programs based in the referring Indian com4 munity.
5
(b) ALCOHOL
AND
6 CENTERS OR FACILITIES.
7
(1) ESTABLISHMENT.
(A) IN
GENERAL.The
Secretary, acting
10
11
12
13
14
15
(B) AREA
OFFICE IN CALIFORNIA.For
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
works.
S 1057 IS
270
267
1
10
11
12
(A) IN
PROVISION OF FUNDS.
GENERAL.Notwithstanding
any
13
14
15
16
funds available to
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
271
268
1
450b(l)).
(B) PROVISION
OF SERVICES TO ELIGI-
BLE
10
11
YOUTHS.Until
additional
residential
INTERMEDIATE
ADOLESCENT
BEHAVIORAL
12 HEALTH SERVICES.
13
(1) IN
GENERAL.The
Secretary, acting
14
15
nizations,
16
17
18
lescents, including
may
provide
intermediate
behavioral
19
20
21
services;
22
23
24
tion; and
S 1057 IS
272
269
1
lence.
(2) USE
OF FUNDS.Funds
provided under
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
based services.
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
273
270
1
(1) IN
GENERAL.The
Secretary, in consulta-
shall
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
(2) TERMS
18
STRUCTURE.Any
19
20
21
22
23
gram.
24
S 1057 IS
274
271
1
(1) IN
GENERAL.The
Secretary, Indian
10
nity.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
atives.
21
(f) INCLUSION
OF
FAMILY
IN
YOUTH TREATMENT
S 1057 IS
275
272
1 bers of such youths in the treatment programs or other
2 services as may be appropriate. Not less than 10 percent
3 of the funds appropriated for the purposes of carrying out
4 subsection (e) shall be used for outpatient care of adult
5 family members related to the treatment of an Indian
6 youth under that subsection.
7
8 acting through the Service, Indian Tribes, Tribal Organi9 zations, and Urban Indian Organizations, shall provide,
10 consistent with section 701, programs and services to pre11 vent and treat the abuse of multiple forms of substances,
12 including alcohol, drugs, inhalants, and tobacco, among
13 Indian youths residing in Indian communities, on or near
14 reservations, and in urban areas and provide appropriate
15 mental health services to address the incidence of mental
16 illness among such youths.
17
18
HEALTH
19
20
FACILITIES
DESIGN,
CONSTRUC-
S 1057 IS
276
273
1 health problems. For the purposes of this subsection, Cali2 fornia shall be considered to be 2 Area Offices, 1 office
3 whose location shall be considered to encompass the north4 ern area of the State of California and 1 office whose ju5 risdiction shall be considered to encompass the remainder
6 of the State of California. The Secretary shall consider
7 the possible conversion of existing, underused Service hos8 pital beds into psychiatric units to meet such need.
9
10
S 1057 IS
277
274
1 learners from the communities receiving services for pre2 vention, intervention, treatment, and aftercare).
3
S 1057 IS
278
275
1
(2)
the
cultural,
spiritual,
and
health problems.
7
8
9 through the Service, Indian Tribes, and Tribal Organiza10 tions, consistent with section 701, may plan, develop, im11 plement, and carry out programs to deliver innovative
12 community-based behavioral health services to Indians.
13
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
279
276
1
tices.
7 subsection, the Secretary shall, in evaluating project appli8 cations or proposals, use the same criteria that the Sec9 retary uses in evaluating any other application or proposal
10 for such funding.
11
12
(a) PROGRAMS.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
section 3.
20
21
(2) USE
OF FUNDS.Funding
provided pursu-
22
23
24
25
hol disorders.
S 1057 IS
280
277
1
child.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
cohol disorder.
20
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
281
278
1
(3) CRITERIA
FOR APPLICATIONS.The
Sec-
10
11
15
16
17
communities; and
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
order.
S 1057 IS
282
279
1
coholism.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
283
280
1 Health Services Administration, shall make funding avail2 able to Indian Tribes, Tribal Organizations, and Urban
3 Indian Organizations for applied research projects which
4 propose to elevate the understanding of methods to pre5 vent, intervene, treat, or provide rehabilitation and behav6 ioral health aftercare for Indians and Urban Indians af7 fected by fetal alcohol disorder.
8
9
(e) FUNDING
TIONS.Ten
FOR
10 to this section shall be used to make grants to Urban In11 dian Organizations funded under title V.
12
13
14
MENT PROGRAMS.
(a)
ESTABLISHMENT.The
Secretary,
acting
15 through the Service, and the Secretary of the Interior, In16 dian Tribes, and Tribal Organizations shall establish, con17 sistent with section 701, in every Service Area, programs
18 involving treatment for
19
20
21
22
23
S 1057 IS
284
281
1
household.
abuse.
10
11
12
13
nity involvement.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
285
282
1
4
5
15
16
17
18
19
S 1057 IS
286
283
1
2
(2)
ALCOHOL-RELATED
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
problems.
20
(3) BEHAVIORAL
HEALTH AFTERCARE.The
21
22
23
24
25
26
287
284
1
10
11
etc.)
12
(4) DUAL
DIAGNOSIS.The
13
14
15
16
ers (MICAs).
17
(5) FETAL
ALCOHOL DISORDERS.The
term
18
19
20
21
(6) FETAL
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
288
285
1
upturned nose.
9
10
FAS.The
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
(9) SUBSTANCE
ABUSE.The
S 1057 IS
term substance
289
286
1
2
TITLE VIIIMISCELLANEOUS
SEC. 801. REPORTS.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
the purposes of this Act and any steps that the Sec-
26
290
287
1
to section 808.
5
6
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
ulations; and
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
291
288
1
203(c).
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
tions 304(b)(2).
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
curity Act.
S 1057 IS
292
289
1
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
(a) DEADLINES.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
293
290
1
VIII.
(2) PROPOSED
REGULATIONS.Proposed
reg-
riod.
10
(3) EXPIRATION
OF AUTHORITY.Except
as
11
12
13
14
S 1057 IS
294
291
1
(c) ADAPTATION
OF
PROCEDURES.The Secretary
(d) LACK
OF
S 1057 IS
295
292
1
2
3
4 Act providing appropriations for the Department for a pe5 riod with respect to the performance of abortions shall
6 apply for that period with respect to the performance of
7 abortions using funds contained in an Act providing ap8 propriations for the Service.
9
10
14
15
16
descendant
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
ments in California.
24
25
26
296
293
1
4 be construed as expanding the eligibility of California Indi5 ans for health services provided by the Service beyond the
6 scope of eligibility for such health services that applied on
7 May 1, 1986.
8
9
10
11
12
13
dian; and
14
15
S 1057 IS
297
294
1 eligible for such services until 1 year after the date of a
2 determination of competency.
3
(c) PROVISION
OF
SERVICES
TO
OTHER INDIVID-
UALS.
(1) IN
GENERAL.The
Secretary is authorized
18
19
20
21
22
health services if
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
298
295
1
2
and
10
11
PROGRAMS.In
the case of
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
299
296
1
graph (1)(B).
(3) PAYMENT
(A)
IN
FOR SERVICES.
GENERAL.Persons
receiving
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
(B) INDIGENT
PEOPLE.Health
services
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
300
297
1
(4) REVOCATION
OF
CONSENT
FOR
SERV-
ICES.
10
(A) SINGLE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
(B) MULTITRIBAL
SERVICE
AREA.In
19
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
301
298
1
services.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
FOR
PRACTITIONERS.
17 Hospital privileges in health facilities operated and main18 tained by the Service or operated under a contract or com19 pact pursuant to the Indian Self-Determination and Edu20 cation Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450 et seq.) may be ex21 tended to non-Service health care practitioners who pro22 vide services to individuals described in subsection (a), (b),
23 (c), or (d). Such non-Service health care practitioners
24 may, as part of privileging process, be designated as em25 ployees of the Federal Government for purposes of section
S 1057 IS
302
299
1 1346(b) and chapter 171 of title 28, United States Code
2 (relating to Federal tort claims) only with respect to acts
3 or omissions which occur in the course of providing serv4 ices to eligible individuals as a part of the conditions under
5 which such hospital privileges are extended.
6
S 1057 IS
303
300
1
2
8 Secretary, acting through the Service, shall provide serv9 ices and benefits for Indians in Montana in a manner con10 sistent with the decision of the United States Court of Ap11 peals for the Ninth Circuit in McNabb for McNabb v.
12 Bowen, 829 F.2d 787 (9th Cir. 1987).
13
304
301
1 such services that were in effect on September 15, 1987,
2 subject to the provisions of sections 806 and 807 until
3 such time as new criteria governing eligibility for services
4 are developed in accordance with section 802.
5
6
14 by the Act, or the application of such provision or amend15 ment to any person or circumstances is held to be invalid,
16 the remainder of this Act, the remaining amendments
17 made by this Act, and the application of such provisions
18 to persons or circumstances other than those to which it
19 is held invalid, shall not be affected thereby.
20
21
22
S 1057 IS
305
302
1
(b) DUTIES
OF
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
306
303
1
Tribes.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
mission.
19
20
mission
21
22
23
24
25
regarding
the
findings
S 1057 IS
and
rec-
307
304
1
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
(c) MEMBERS.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
308
305
1
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
populations.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
of Urban Indians.
S 1057 IS
309
306
1
(2) CHAIR;
VICE CHAIR.The
10
(4) DEADLINE
FOR
APPOINTMENTS.Con-
11
12
pointed not later than 180 days after the date of en-
13
14
15
16
17
sional members.
18
19
20
21
(d) COMPENSATION.
22
(1) CONGRESSIONAL
MEMBERS.Each
con-
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
310
307
1
(2) OTHER
MEMBERS.Remaining
members
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
S 1057 IS
311
308
1
(1) APPOINTMENT;
PAY.The
Commission
(2) STAFF
APPOINTMENT.With
the approval
appropriate.
(3) STAFF
PAY.The
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
(4) TEMPORARY
SERVICES.With
the ap-
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
312
309
1
sion.
S 1057 IS
313
310
1 mates as the Commission determines to be necessary to
2 carry out its duties.
3
10 of any Federal agency is authorized to detail, without re11 imbursement, any of the personnel of such agency to the
12 Commission to assist the Commission in carrying out its
13 duties. Any such detail shall not interrupt or otherwise
14 affect the civil service status or privileges of the Federal
15 employee.
16
S 1057 IS
314
311
1
8 ministrator of General Services shall provide to the Com9 mission on a reimbursable basis such administrative sup10 port services as the Commission may request.
11
24 (c)(2)(A) or (B) of section 401 of the Congressional Budg25 et Act of 1974) which is provided under this Act shall
S 1057 IS
315
312
1 be effective for any fiscal year only to such extent or in
2 such amounts as are provided in appropriation Acts.
3
4
(1) POSITIONS
AT LEVEL IV.Section
5315 of
10
11
12
13
(2) POSITIONS
AT LEVEL V.Section
5316 of
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
316
313
1
lowing:
10
(3) ASSISTANT
SECRETARY.The
term As-
11
12
Indian Health.;
13
14
15
following:
16
17
DIAN HEALTH.;
18
19
20
TOR
21
22
23
TOR
24
and
S 1057 IS
317
314
1
dian Health.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
(6) Section 317M(b) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247b14(b)) is amended
21
22
23
serting
24
Health; and
S 1057 IS
Assistant
Secretary
for
Indian
318
315
1
10
11
12
13
14
dian Health.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
319
316
1
11
12
(a) EXPANSION
OF
MEDICAID PAYMENT
BY
FOR
ALL
INDIAN HEALTH
14 PROGRAMS.
15
(1) EXPANSION
16
17
1396j) is amended
18
19
follows:
20
INDIAN
21
HEALTH PROGRAMS;
22
follows:
23
(a) ELIGIBILITY
24
and
CAL
FOR
REIMBURSEMENT
FOR
MEDI-
25 dian Tribe, Tribal Organization, or an urban Indian Orga26 nization (as such terms are defined in section 4 of the
S 1057 IS
320
317
1 Indian Health Care Improvement Act) shall be eligible for
2 reimbursement for medical assistance provided under a
3 State plan or under waiver authority with respect to items
4 and services furnished by the Indian Health Service, In5 dian Tribe, Tribal Organization, or Urban Indian Organi6 zation if the furnishing of such services meets all the con7 ditions and requirements which are applicable generally to
8 the furnishing of items and services under this title and
9 under such plan or waiver authority..
10
(2) ELIMINATION
11
PROVISION.Such
12
subsection (b).
13
(3) REVISION
OF
TEMPORARY
DEEMING
14
AGREEMENTS.Subsection
15
16
as follows:
17
S 1057 IS
321
318
1 provider to Indians who are eligible for medical assistance
2 under the State plan or under waiver authority..
3
(4) REFERENCE
CORRECTION.Subsection
(d)
is amended
RECT
9
10
BILLING.For; and
11 CARE PROVIDERS,
12
AND
FOR
TIES.
13
(1) IN
GENERAL.Section
14
15
16
17 CARE PROVIDERS,
18
TIES.A
AND
HEALTH
(2)
APPLICATION
TO
SCHIP.Section
S 1057 IS
322
319
1
lowing:
3
4
5
6 ORGANIZATIONS,
AND
OF INDIAN
TRIBES, TRIBAL
11
(C) INDIAN
HEALTH
PROGRAM
PAY-
12
MENTS.For
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
after Service.
S 1057 IS
323
320
1
2
3
DATION.
6
7
10
11
12
13
In this title:
(1) BOARD.The term Board means the
Board of Directors of the Foundation.
(2)
COMMITTEE.The
term
Committee
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
324
321
1
2
3
FOUNDATION.
4 date of enactment of this title, the Secretary shall estab5 lish, under the laws of the District of Columbia and in
6 accordance with this title, the Native American Health
7 and Wellness Foundation.
8
(c) NATURE
OF
CORPORATION.The Foundation
14
15
(d) PLACE
OF
INCORPORATION
AND
DOMICILE.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
325
322
1
(f) COMMITTEE
TIVE
TION.
FOR THE
AMERICAN HEALTH
(1) IN
ESTABLISHMENT
AND
OF
NA-
WELLNESS FOUNDA-
GENERAL.The
10
11
12
13
14
15
shall
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
S 1057 IS
326
323
1
staff; and
8
9
10
GENERAL.The
Board of Directors
11
12
13
dation.
14
(3) SELECTION.
15
(A) IN
GENERAL.Subject
to subpara-
16
17
18
19
20
21
Foundation.
22
(B) REQUIREMENTS.
23
(i) NUMBER
OF
MEMBERS.The
24
25
S 1057 IS
327
324
1
(ii) INITIAL
VOTING MEMBERS.The
10
11
12
matters.
13
14
15
16
17
18
Foundation.
19
(h) OFFICERS.
20
(1) IN
21
24
25
tion shall be
22
23
GENERAL.The
S 1057 IS
328
325
1
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
OFFICES.The
activities of
S 1057 IS
329
326
1
Foundation.
(k) SERVICE
OF
(l) LIABILITY
OF
OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES,
AND
9 AGENTS.
10
(1) IN
GENERAL.The
Foundation shall be
11
12
13
their authority.
14
(2) PERSONAL
LIABILITY.A
member of the
15
16
17
ber.
18
(m) RESTRICTIONS.
19
(1) LIMITATION
ON
SPENDING.Beginning
20
with the fiscal year following the first full fiscal year
21
22
23
S 1057 IS
330
327
1
(B)
donations
received
from
(2) APPOINTMENT
AND
private
HIRING.The
ap-
10
11
12
13
United States.
14
(o) FUNDING.
(1) AUTHORIZATION
OF APPROPRIATIONS.
20
21
22
23
24
partment of Labor.
S 1057 IS
331
328
1
(2) TRANSFER
OF
DONATED
FUNDS.The
were donated.
8
9
(a) PROVISION
OF
SUPPORT
BY
SECRETARY.Sub-
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
S 1057 IS
332
329
1
(c) CONTINUATION
OF
CERTAIN SERVICES.The
13
14
17
18
19
title VII;
20
21
22
23
24
25
S 1057 IS
333
330
1
S 1057 IS
334
Senator ENZI. Chairman McCain, welcome to our home.
STATEMENT OF HON. JOHN MCCAIN, U.S. SENATOR FROM
ARIZONA, CHAIRMAN, COMMITTEE ON INDIAN AFFAIRS
335
Once in a while we get disparities in urban areas among different kinds of groups, but if we look at the total range of health
disparities, it does not exist in any place in our Nation as it exists
with Native Americans. This cries out for action. It cries out for response.
I just want to thank Senator McCain and Senator Dorgan for
their leadership. This legislation is way, way overdue. I thank you
for having the hearing and giving the spotlight on this. I pledge to
work with you and our colleagues to do what we can so we have
a seamless web in trying to make sure that those whose tradition
comes from Indian land are going to have the kind of health care
needs that they are entitled to in our Nation.
I thank you, and I would like to ask that my full statement be
put in the record.
[Prepared statement of Senator Kennedy appears in appendix.]
Senator ENZI. Without objection, all statements will be in the
record.
I think you can tell from the opening statements that there is a
lot of passion behind this, so lets get on to the witnesses. Our first
witness is Dr. Charles Grim. Dr. Grim is the director of Indian
Health Service. He is the Assistant Surgeon General and holds the
rank of Rear Admiral in the Commissioned Corps of the Public
Health Service. We thank you for being here, Dr. Grim.
STATEMENT OF DR. CHARLES GRIM, DIRECTOR, INDIAN
HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN
SERVICES, ACCOMPANIED BY ROBERT G. MCSWAIN, DEPUTY
DIRECTOR; GARY HARTZ, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENT
HEALTH
AND
ENGINEERING;
AND
CRAIG
VANDERWAGEN, M.D., ACTING CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER
336
Human Service. This transfer was more appropriate to the role of
the Federal Government in addressing the health care needs of
American Indians and Alaska Natives. Since the Transfer Act, the
health status of Indians have improved significantly.
Today, we are here to discuss another significant milestone in
the evolution of our Federal Governments responsibility for the
provision of health services to American Indians and Alaska Natives, the Indian Health Care Improvement Act which was first authorized in 1976. It forms the backbone of the system through
which the Federal health programs serve American Indians and
Alaska Natives and encourage their participation in these and
other programs.
IHS has the responsibility for the delivery of health services to
more than 1.8 million federally recognized American Indians and
Alaska Natives through a system of IHS, tribal and urban Indianoperated facilities in programs based on treaties and judicial decisions and statutes. The mission of the agency is to raise the physical, mental, social, and spiritual health of the American Indian
and Alaska Natives to the highest level in partnership with the
population we serve. Our goal is to assure that comprehensive, culturally appropriate, acceptable personal and public health services
are available and accessible.
Our foundation is to uphold the Federal Governments responsibility to promote healthy American Indian and Alaska Native
people, communities and cultures, and to honor and protect the inherent sovereign rights of tribes.
The Indian Health Care Improvement Act builds upon the Snyder Act of 1921, which authorized regular appropriations for the relief and distress and conservation of health of American Indians
and Alaska Natives. Like the Snyder Act, the Indian Health Care
Improvement Act authorizes programs that deliver health services
to Indian people, as well as providing additional directives and
guidance.
For example, the Indian Health Care Improvement Act contains
specific authorities addressing recruitment and retention of health
professionals serving Indian communities, the provision of health
services, the construction, replacement and repair of health care facilities, access to health services, and the provision of health services to urban Indian people.
We are here today to discuss the reauthorization of the Indian
Health Care Improvement Act and its impact on programs and
services provided for in current law. S. 1057 proposes to amend
current program authority to assure the highest possible health
status for Indians. Improving access for health care for all eligible
American Indians and Alaska Natives is critical to achieving this
goal and a priority for all those involved in the administration of
this important program.
S. 1057, however, also provides expansions which may negatively
impact access by requiring the secretary to consult, negotiate, develop reports and establish programs and activities beyond the reasonable scope necessary to effectively implement the Indian Health
Care Improvement Act. In S. 1057, between desire to improve access and provisions that potentially compromise access, we hope to
find a means for achieving our common goal.
337
Since enactment of the Indian Health Care Act in 1976, statutory
authority has substantially expanded programs and activities to
keep pace with advances in health care delivery and administration. Federal funding for the Indian Health Care Improvement Act
has contributed billions of dollars to improve the health status of
American Indians and Alaska Natives. Much progress has been
made, particularly in the areas of infant and maternal mortality.
The Department has also reactivated the Intra-departmental
Council on Native American Affairs to provide a consistent HHS
policy when working with more than 560 federally recognized
tribes. This council, which was authorized in the Native American
Programs Act of 1974, gives the IHS Director a highly visible role
within the Department on Indian policy. I serve as the vice chair
of that council.
The Department has also revised our consultation policy recently
through a process which involved tribal leaders. The policy emphasizes the unique government-to-government relationship between
Indian tribes and the Federal Government and assists in improving
services through better communications. Consultation is conducted
at different levels and includes annual budget consultations with
tribes to ensure their participation in this important process. The
annual budget meetings provide tribes with an opportunity to meet
directly with all department agencies and identify their priorities
for upcoming years.
In addition, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has
established a technical tribal advisory group which was established
to provide tribes a vehicle to communicate concerns and comments
to CMS on Medicare, Medicaid and SCHIP policies impacting their
members. IHS has been vigilant about improving outcomes for Indian children and families with diabetes by increasing education
and physical activity programs aimed at preventing and addressing
the needs of those susceptible or struggling with this potentially
disabling disease.
The Department has not been a passive observer of the health
needs of eligible American Indians and Alaska Natives, yet we recognize the health disparities among this population do exist and
are among some of the highest in the Nation for certain diseases,
as you pointed out. We know that improvements in access to IHS
and other Federal programs and private sector programs will result
in improved health status for Indian people.
We support the provisions that increase the flexibility of the Department to work with tribes and urban Indian programs to increase the availability of health care, including new approaches to
delivering care and to expand the scope of health services available
to American Indians and Alaska Natives. I commend Congress for
including in S. 1057 various changes that respond to the concerns
raised in previous proposals. Some of the changes improve the ability of the Secretary to effectively manage the program.
In the area of behavioral health, title VII of S. 1057, it provides
for the needs of Indian women and youth and expands behavioral
health service to include a much-needed child sexual abuse and
prevention treatment program. The Department supports this effort, but opposes specific requirements in certain sections of this
title, specifically 704, 706 and 711. Essentially, it is a shall ver-
338
sus may issue that diminishes the flexibility of the secretary in
providing for these important programs in a manner that supports
the local control and priorities of tribes and be able to address their
specific needs.
The Department also opposes a new section 104(a)(2) which proposes to allocate the Indian Health Profession Scholarship Program
funding by formula to the 12 IHS areas. If allocation by formula
is authorized, students will not be given an opportunity to apply
for a scholarships if their area does not receive an adequate allocation and if their desired profession is not considered a priority in
their area, even though there may be great needs nationally for
such professions. We would recommend that this program remain
a national program.
My written testimony includes other specific areas of concern. In
addition, the Department continues to carefully analyze all provisions contained in S. 1057. The department would like to continue
to work with your committees to discuss our concerns with the bill
as drafted.
Based on the work that has occurred between the Department
and congressional committees in the 108th Congress on the predecessor proposal, S. 556, to this current bill S. 1057, I am confident
that we can reach a mutual agreement on a bill that can be acceptable to our parties, including tribes and urban Indians, and raise
their health status in the years to come.
I would be pleased to answer any questions that you may have,
and thank your for having us today.
[Prepared statement of Dr. Grim appears in appendix.]
Senator ENZI. Thank you very much for being here. I will mention that we are going to have some confusion with votes that are
starting at 3 p.m. today, but one of the things that we do by having
people serve on panels, we are hoping that they are also open to
written questions. A lot of times we have written questions anyway
that go into much more detail than would be possible for us to be
able to do in a forum like this.
So we hope that all witnesses will be open to answering written
questions, from all committee members. Our purpose is to build a
record so that we have the capability to write the best bill. I appreciate the testimony you have given.
As you might be aware, I am very interested in expanding health
information technology to all health care providers. We have done
some legislation on that. Could you briefly tell me what kinds of
information technology activities are occurring in the Indian
Health Service? More importantly, are there any barriers to broader implementation of those programs?
Mr. GRIM. The Indian Health Service has had electronic health
records for many, many years. Just this year, we started the implementation of a fully electronic graphical user interface health
record. It has now been rolled out in 24 of our sites. We are in
hopes that by the year fiscal year 2008 or 2009, we will have a
fully electronic health record in all of our programs. We are making
use of the latest technology that there is. We have tele-health programs that are excellent that are in the State of Alaska that tie
all of the community health clinics into some of the regional hub
hospitals. We are looking at the expansion of tele-medicine across
339
our agency in the years ahead. We have it in various sites, but not
others.
So I would say, Senator, that we are I think right on the cutting
edge. We are working with the Presidents Health Information
Technology Program. We have representatives that are sitting on
that. I would be happy to answer anything further or more details
that you might about that for the record.
Senator ENZI. I will do some followup questions in writing.
Senator McCain.
Senator MCCAIN. Thank you very much, Dr. Grim.
For the record, you might mention who is accompanying you at
the table.
Mr. GRIM. Okay. I have my deputy director, Robert McSwain;
Gary Hartz, our director for the Office of Environmental Health
and Engineering; and Craig Vanderwagen, our chief medical officer.
Senator MCCAIN. Welcome.
Doctor, we have been around this track a few times before, as
you know.
Mr. GRIM. Yes, sir.
Senator MCCAIN. Last year, you raised several objections. We
tried to accommodate them. A lot of those objections have to do
with flexibility. You want maximum flexibility for the Department
to work on meeting the health care needs of Indian people. I understand that. Most bureaucracies do. But some of the objections you
raised last year and this year seem to reflect an unwillingness to
accord the same flexibility to Indian tribes. We find that not proportional. What is your response?
Mr. GRIM. I would just say that we would continue to work with
the committee if there are specific provisions in the bill where you
think that we are giving up the tribes flexibility I would be more
than happy to discuss it.
As I mentioned earlier, we have a very robust consultation policy
within both the Department and the Indian Health Service, and do
not make any major policy or budgeting decisions without consulting tribes. So we would be more than happy to work with the committees on those specific issues.
Senator MCCAIN. One specific issue, you raise objection to the
GAO preparing a comprehensive baseline report on Indian health
facilities that is presently in the bill.
Mr. GRIM. Yes, sir.
Senator MCCAIN. Yet your department has never been able to
provide the tribes or Congress any total information on the number, size or status of the Indian health facilities. If the GAO does
not prepare a comprehensive baseline report, then who does?
Mr. GRIM. The reason that we made those comments, Senator
McCain, is that the agency has been in the process over the course
of the last 112 years in consulting with tribes on a new priority system for the agency. It will be a more expansive type of priority system than our current one. We are in the final process of that. We
had a tribally driven work group called the Facilities Appropriation
Advisory Board, made up of tribal members across the Nation that
developed a priority system recommendation with waiting and criteria.
340
We sent that out to tribal leaders all across the Nation. We received over 800 comments on that. The group incorporated those
and they are very close to making a recommendation to me. That
will be a much more comprehensive listing than we currently have.
That was the reason we asked that reference to GAO doing that
report be removed. We feel that we are very, very close to implementing that. It has been through tribal consultation.
Senator MCCAIN. How does a GAO baseline report interfere with
any of the things you just said? Are you concerned about needless
expenditure of taxpayer dollars? I do not see how a GAO report
would interfere with any of the good things that you just described.
Mr. GRIM. Our concern, I think, is that it would take additional
time of agency staff. We are almost there. We almost have the
data. We would have to work with GAO I think rather extensively
to get the data transferred over to them into a report, but if that
is the committees wish.
Senator MCCAIN. Mr. Chairman, I have several questions I
would like to submit for the record. I thank you, Mr. Chairman.
I thank the witnesses.
Mr. GRIM. Certainly, Senator.
Senator ENZI. Senator Dorgan.
Senator DORGAN. Mr. Chairman, thank you very much.
Dr. Grim, you and I have had plenty of opportunity across the
dais to talk about these issues. I will not ask you again the question, what was your recommendation to the Office of Management
and Budget for funding for the Indian Health Service. Was it substantially different than that which was expressed in the Presidents budget to the Congress? I have asked you that a couple of
times and I think you have felt like you have been unable to answer it or unwilling to answer it and would probably get in trouble
if you answered it. Do you still feel that way?
Mr. GRIM. Yes, sir. [Laughter.]
Senator DORGAN. Why dont we get you in trouble today? [Laughter.]
Let me ask you, at a recent hearing one of the witnesses who testified after you and Dr. Carmona spoke mentioned that the Indian
Health Service is funded at about 40 percent or 45 percent of the
level of need. What is your assessment of that? Almost all of us
would agree that there are in many cases a bona fide emergency
with respect to health care on reservations, so it is funded at something below the level of need. What is your assessment of the statement that it is only at 40 percent or 45 percent?
Mr. GRIM. We have some data on that and we can provide that
for the record, Senator Dorgan.
Senator DORGAN. But do you think it is 50 percent of the level
of need or 75 percent of the level of need? Any notion?
Mr. GRIM. We have data that we update annually on that and
I cannot recall what the exact numbers are right now, but we will
provide that.
Senator DORGAN. Do any of your staff know the answer to that?
It just seems to me like that is a pretty fundamental question.
What is the need out there and how close are we to meeting the
need? I have said before in other venues that we have a trust responsibility for health care for American Indians. We also have re-
341
sponsibility for health care of Federal prisoners, and we spend
about twice as much per capita for Federal prisoners health care
as we do for Native Americans.
So it seems to me just by observation we are something substantially below the level of need. I am trying to determine whether we
have any notion of what that is.
Mr. GRIM. We do have a notion of what that is. I do not know
if it has been updated for the current fiscal year, Senator Dorgan,
but it is somewhere in the nature of 60 percent.
Senator DORGAN. At 60 percent? All right. That would suggest
we are about 40 percent short of fulfilling the need, which is really
a serious, serious omission.
My colleague, Senator McCain, asked the question about the
health care facilities. I believe this year the recommendation is a
cut in health care facilities. I think it is around $70 million, $75
million. I would share his question about why would anybody object
to a GAO baseline report. I understand that you are working on
a priorities list. I also understand from an inquiry I made yesterday that that is about 6 months or 9 months away.
Mr. GRIM. We have done the master health services planning for
that whole process across our regions, but you are probably accurate in an about 6-month timeframe before a final report would be
done. What we still have yet to do is we have told the tribes that
if the recommendations that all came in resulted in a significant
change to either the criteria that we were suggested or the
weighting of the criteria, that we would come back to tribal leadership one more time, show them the formula, talk to them about the
changes that had been made and why those had been made based
on the recommendations from around the Nation. And then if there
was not significant disagreement, we would implement that new
priority system, run all of our health services master plans through
that, and then come up with a comprehensive list.
Senator DORGAN. Yes; there is an urgency to do that and get that
done as quickly as possible. I hope you would not object to the requirement in the bill with respect to the GAO. If it is duplicative,
so be it. Although perhaps by the time that would be implemented,
you would have finished your report.
I think certainly on behalf of those of us who serve on the Committee on Indian Affairs, there is an urgency here to find a way
for us to move this legislation forward. We are very frustrated. We
could not do it last year. We should do it now. I hope that you and
others will play a constructive role in letting us, not letting us, in
cooperating with us to move this legislation sooner rather than
later.
Mr. GRIM. Yes, sir; Senator Dorgan.
Senator DORGAN. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator ENZI. Thank you.
Senator Murkowski.
Senator MURKOWSKI. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Welcome, Dr. Grim. I always appreciate your being here and
hearing from you. Your statement this afternoon does not make
any reference to the Dental Health Aide Therapist Program. We
are going to be hearing a little bit more on the third panel this
342
afternoon. As a dentist and as a public health professional, can you
give your opinion regarding this program?
Mr. GRIM. I have traveled to Alaska numerous times, as you
know.
Senator MURKOWSKI. And we like that.
Mr. GRIM. I am looking forward to coming again sometime soon.
I have traveled with our former secretary to that region. We did
have an opportunity to talk with the tribes about that particular
program the last time we were up there last summer. We felt that
the program had merit, and since then additional views have been
coming forward and additional concerns.
We are continuing to meet with all the parties that are concerned. We have met with the Alaska tribes. We have met with the
American Dental Association. We continue to try to look for a solution to the problems of the high levels of unmet dental care that
occur in the bush in the very rural parts of Alaska. We are committed to working with you and with the tribes there to try to resolve
that issue.
Senator MURKOWSKI. Some of us feel that one way to resolve it
is through this Dental Health Aide Therapist Program. Can you
kind of speak to some of the challenges that IHS has in recruiting
dentists for rural Alaska and to these villages?
Mr. GRIM. Yes; I can, Senator. We currently have about a 24 percent vacancy rate for dentists nationally, IHS-wide. The last statistics that I had seen from the tribes in Alaska showed that in the
outer-lying parts of Alaska that number is getting close to about
50 percent. We are having trouble nationally recruiting dentists
into many of our programs.
So we continue to work with organizations like the American
Dental Association. We work with the U.S. Association of Colleges
of Dentistry to try to do what we can to recruit at locations like
that, but currently we are simply lacking the ability to fill those.
Senator MURKOWSKI. Are you having any success with that recruitment then?
Mr. GRIM. We are able to fill our positions to this level, but we
seem to be at about this level and cannot seem to quite get over
to filling greater than about 75 percent of our dental positions right
now. It has been hovering around that for a couple of years.
Senator MURKOWSKI. So as we look into the future, then, with
meeting the dental health care needs of our Alaska Natives in our
villages, do you see a way that we are going to be able to get
enough dentists out there in rural Alaska to meet the need?
Mr. GRIM. I think it is going to require a long-term concerted effort, but I am always hopeful that we are going to be able to do
that. We continue to have moneys in our scholarship and loan repayment programs that we use to try to train new native students,
and I think we need to continue to try to be very aggressive at recruiting current Alaska Natives who want to get into dental school
and try to encourage them to do that; get them into our scholarship
program and hopefully have them go back home and serve their obligations in their communities, and then continue to stay with their
tribal programs and serve out their professional career.
I do think it is going to be a long-term effort. We are working
with all sorts of individuals, as I said, universities and the Amer-
343
ican Dental Association, among others, to try to jointly work on
that issue for the Indian Health Service.
Senator MURKOWSKI. You have kind of ducked the specific question of how you feel about the Dental Health Aide Therapist Program. What I am hearing you say is you recognize the need. We
have to do something. We must do something and that you are
going to be working with us on that.
Mr. GRIM. Yes; Senator Murkowski.
Senator MURKOWSKI. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator ENZI. Thank you.
Senator Reed.
Senator REED. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Thank you, Dr. Grim.
Let me follow on with Senator Murkowskis question and broaden it to recruiting other health care professionals. It is not just
dentists you have a problem recruiting. Could you lay out the
shortcomings for recruiting as you see them today?
Mr. GRIM. I can give you some specifics on percentages of where
we are right now in many of the professions. I can supply that for
the record. Really, a lot of what we deal with tracks with what the
Nation as a whole is. There is a nursing shortage, and so we are
facing difficulty recruiting nurses as well. Pharmacy and dentistry
continue to be areas where we have high vacancy rates, too, and
it seems to track with some of the needs in the Nation as a whole.
So not only are we facing the private sector economy trying to
recruit the same types of people. Many times our locations are
rural and isolated and so we have the difficulty of that as well on
top of it. But we do have, as I said, scholarships and loan repayment programs. We have very active recruitment programs for
nursing, medicine, dental, pharmacy, and we are doing the best we
can.
I know the professions themselves are looking at those issues,
too, as they see the numbers of certain types of professions, you
know, more people retiring than are graduating and what it is
going to mean for the country.
Senator REED. Is there more that we can do to assist you in
terms of legislation or appropriations? Is this simply a social problem that is beyond any additional help from us?
Mr. GRIM. I guess if I knew the answer, we might already be
here. Yet we would welcome any help that the committee might be
able to provide us. We are still studying the issues, too, and working with the various professional organizations. We have a large
group of professional organizations we work with on a regular
basis. They are all very, very supportive of our program and try to
help us within their own ranks of their professions, but we still
face those difficulties. Thank you for your support.
Senator REED. Doctor, Senator Dorgan alluded to the budget
shortfalls which your rough estimate is about 40 percent gap between the need and the resources. In high-cost parts of the country
like Rhode Island, where we have the Narragansett Tribe, not only
is this funding insufficient, but the costs are significantly higher.
Is there any attention to these areas? Where there are high costs,
housing costs in the area where the tribe has their tribal lands
344
growing at 100 percent, I am not exaggerating, in the last five
years. It is incredible.
Mr. GRIM. I believe you.
Senator REED. It is hard to just maintain the staff. They have
not had a raise in 5 years. Is there any attention to these specifically high-cost areas?
Mr. GRIM. Well, there are some pay adjustments that staff can
get for living in higher cost areas, but one of the things that we
are trying to do is to recognize it on a formula allocation basis. As
I said, whenever we get any new additional program increases, we
consult with tribes on how that is distributed across the Nation. As
they have joined us in the process and the agency not making those
decisions alone, our formulas for distributing money have become
more and more complex, but more sensitive to issues like that. We
have certain formulas now for types of funds that we give out that
a portion of the funds are given out based on the nearest metropolitan area and the costs in that area. So we are trying to take some
of that into account now as we allocate funds. We will divide a formula into three parts and maybe one-third is devoted to the costs
in an area. So if you live in a higher-cost area, you get more funds
in that component of the formula. So we are trying to do that to
try to address it within the funds that we have.
Senator REED. Thank you very much, Doctor.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator ENZI. Thank you.
I would mention that Senator Inouye could just be here briefly
between committee meetings and the vote. He does have a statement to submit and questions that he will want to have submitted,
too. And that is open to members of both committees, as well.
Senator Coburn.
Senator COBURN. Thank you, Senator.
Welcome from one Oklahoman to another. Glad to see you again,
Dr. Grim.
Mr. GRIM. Thank you, Senator. Good to see you.
Senator COBURN. Would you like to have an irreversible dental
procedure done on you by a dental health aide? Would you want
your family to have an irreversible dental procedure done by a dental health aide that has a high school graduation and some foreign
training?
Mr. GRIM. I think if I was in a situation where I was in pain
with a lack of adequately trained dentists, I would be able to do
that.
Senator COBURN. That is my whole point. We are going to give
less quality because we are not meeting our need. I just came
through a campaign and one of the things I was critical of, and I
am critical of, is health care to Native Americans, with six times
the rate for dialysis for Native Americans, six times the rate, which
says we are not doing diabetes right. The question is, the ADA opposes this, but why cant you work out a deal where they have
locum tenens up there? If they really do not want this to happen,
why wont they volunteer for service up there? Lets work a deal.
Lets have them do the right thing.
You create an environment where we can have dentists who will
volunteer their services for Native Alaskans and solve this problem
345
while we are in a shortfall. I think you will find that they will be
agreeable to that. I think that would solve the problem. But this
idea of not meeting our obligation, meeting it by name, but not in
quality, I think is one of the most critical things we have to do at
the Indian Health Service. That is by no means a reflection on the
people who work there. You have a burden and you do not have
the resources with which to carry out the completion and attack
that burden.
With your electronic medical record, have you instituted best
practices, especially for diabetes?
Mr. GRIM. Yes, sir; we have.
Senator COBURN. And that is being followed? Are you tracking
that to see the better outcomes and lower hemoglobin and A(1)(c)s
and better compliance?
Mr. GRIM. Yes, sir; we have. We have seen a downward trend in
the hemoglobin A(1)(c)s. We are seeing better blood pressure control; better us of the ACE inhibitors. We have an extensive database of almost our entire diabetic patient population, tracking both
clinical indicators. We also with the special diabetes program funds
for Indians that Congress made available for us, we have just recently released the report to Congress that shows a huge increase
in the number of both primary and secondary prevention programs
in Indian Country that were present now, prior to the funds were
not available to the population.
So we are seeing a very positive trend in the care of diabetes. We
have been in the diabetes care business for many years. In fact, the
diabetes grant funds, one of the things we did was put together
with professional experts in the agency and the American Diabetes
Association a series of 11 or 12 best practices that tribes could use
in their grants, depending on what were the particular problems in
their communities, and suggested ways they might assess which of
those they wanted to do. So I think we have done an outstanding
job with the use of the funds that Congress given. Tribes deserve
a lot of credit for that because the vast majority of those funds
went directly to tribes. They have implemented a lot of great programs.
Senator COBURN. I would just note that the Congress refused to
support recently with an amendment that I offered for additional
funding for diabetes prevention. We are going to buy more land,
rather than take care of the Native American obligation that we
have. It was pretty disappointing to me. I think we got 17 votes
in the Senate to fund prevention activities for diabetes, so it might
reflect on the Senate where our priorities are.
Do you ongoing tracking on prevention across the board within
Indian Health Service?
Mr. GRIM. Yes, sir; we do. We have long been an agency and a
health care system that focuses on prevention, not just in the clinic, but also in environmental health arenas as well, and safe water
and sanitation facilities, to make huge improvements.
Senator COBURN. So can you give me a time at which we are
going to see the same type of diabetic control in the Indian population, Native American population, that we see in the rest of the
population in this country?
346
Mr. VANDERWAGEN. Dr. Coburn, I would say right now we are
probably leading the Nation in diabetic treatment, not necessarily
primary prevention, but in secondary prevention through effective
treatment with evidence-based best practices. I would say we have
evidence to support the assertion that we are probably leading the
country right now.
Senator COBURN. So we are going to see a decline in complications, amputations, dialysis?
Mr. VANDERWAGEN. In fact, we have had a 50-percent decline
over the last 5 years in amputations. We are the only sub-population where deaths due to ESRD have declined between 2000 and
2002. I think the Senate, the Congress invested well in putting
that money into that diabetes effort. Now, can we extend it to heart
disease, cancer and other chronic diseases is the real challenge that
I think we are facing in Indian country.
Senator COBURN. Well, best practices is going to help you do
that. This is a great example to help us know how we solve the rest
of the health care problem in this country. It is called prevention.
It is not treatment after the fact. It is prevention. And you all are
to be complimented on the institution of best practices because it
is what it is going to take for us to get out of the health care crisis
that we are in in this country. My hat is off to you. I just want
to see the results coming forward, and then work on the prevention
in terms of diet because that is just as important for not only the
Native American community, but the entire American community.
Mr. GRIM. Our three primary focus areas that we have been
working with tribes around the country on are health promotion,
disease prevention, behavioral health issues, both alcohol, substance abuse and mental health, as well as those behavioral issues
with the lifestyle diseases like diabetes and chronic disease management. We are looking at better models with now that we might
put in place in many of our programs because we do have a huge
burden right now of patients that already have these diseases, but
we are focusing on all three of those areas. Again, we are looking
at some best practice models in chronic disease management that
we will start using in some other disease areas.
Senator COBURN. I can ask this later and ask it formally as part
of the record, do you have tracking on malpractice claims within
the Indian Health Service as relative to outside of the Indian
Health Service? Can you give that data to the Committee so that
we can look at it?
Mr. GRIM. Yes, sir; I believe we can.
Mr. VANDERWAGEN. In brief, it is about 100 cases per year that
come to torts. That rate really is about 50 percent compared to the
private sector.
Senator COBURN. Come to trial or that are filed?
Mr. VANDERWAGEN. That are filed and deemed worthy and are
carried forward. That has been a pretty steady state for about the
last 10 or 15 years, some slight trending up. Most of that is associated with our larger, more complex hospitals, but we would be
happy to give you the full picture.
Senator COBURN. Thank you very much.
Let me just thank you again for your service, and I am proud you
are an Oklahoman.
347
Mr. GRIM. Thank you.
Senator ENZI. Senator Murray.
STATEMENT OF HON. PATTY MURRAY, U.S. SENATOR FROM
WASHINGTON
348
I would also like to send a special welcome to Richard Brannan,
the chairman of the Northern Arapaho Business Council from Fort
Washakie, WY. Thank you very much from Fort Washakie, WY. I
thank you for being here today. I have appreciated all the expertise
on tribal issues that you have provided to us over the years. I know
the committee will appreciate your testimony.
I would also like to introduce Ralph Forquera, the executive director of the Seattle Indian Health Board in Seattle, WA.
Ms. Joseph, it is nice to see you. Please begin.
Ms. JOSEPH. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator MCCAIN. By the way, my colleagues are voting and they
will be coming back and forth. I want to extend my apologies for
the interference of our parliamentary procedures. Welcome, Ms. Joseph.
STATEMENT OF RACHEL A. JOSEPH, CHAIRPERSON, LONE
PINE PAIUTE SHOSHONE RESERVATION
349
and the expenditures for a prisoners health care is almost double
what is spent on a patient in the IHS system.
In 1999, a national steering committee for the reauthorization
was formed. Consultation was held extensively across the country
to develop consensus recommendations to address our current
needs. Included among those recommendations was the authorization for a comprehensive behavioral health program which reflects
tribal values and emphasizes collaboration among alcohol and substance abuse social services and mental health programs, which
was reflected in title VII of S. 1057. I was quite taken aback when
I heard Dr. Grim express objection to section 11(2)(b). In fact, that
has been a challenge for us in dealing with reauthorization. We
have never seen a finite list of what the objections are.
But if I might briefly talk about what our intent was when we
developed language with 711(2)(b). This is a section dealing with
fetal alcohol disorders. We feel strongly that we need to do everything we can to change the behavior of pregnant women, high-risk
pregnant women, and women that are pregnant with Indian babies, to encourage them not to indulge in alcohol and substance
abuse. That was our intent. We think this is a priority and we
think that the program should do this. We are surprised that there
is an objection to that provision.
Another recommendation is authorizing the elevation of the Assistant Secretary, elevation of the Indian Health Service Director
to an Assistant Secretary appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate.
The deplorable disparities in our health indicators compared to
the general population require us to assert that we need to approach our responsibilities differently. Status quo is not acceptable.
We believe that elevation would be comparable to the administration of the BIA programs by an Assistant Secretary in the Department of the Interior and the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing in the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
We also recommend authorizing the Entitlement Commission to
study the optimal way that health care should be provided to our
people. Indian tribes strongly believe that through the cession of
400 million acres of land to the United States in exchange for
promises for health care and other services often reflected in treaties, that we secured a de facto contract which entitles us to health
care in perpetuity, based on the moral, legal and historic obligations of the United States. We also believe that we need to be able
to address the long-term health care for the elderly as an option,
rather than more expensive, costly or clinical care.
We believe that these recommendations, many of which are included in S. 1057, are essential to help us modernize our health
care delivery.
In closing, I want you to know that in spite of our deplorable
health conditions, we remain optimistic because our tribal governments and programs are having successes and do so much with so
little. We hope for reauthorization this year. We hope that one day
our young people no longer commit suicide because they will have
hope. We hope that one day we will no longer have to deal with
meth problems and other substance abuse in our communities. We
350
hope that our grandchildren will be healthy. We hope that we can
provide long-term quality health care to elders in the waning years
of their lives.
We hope for all these things because we know that the Creator
has put us here for a purpose and we need your help.
Thank you for this time.
[Prepared statement of Ms. Joseph appears in appendix.]
Senator ENZI. Thank you.
Mr. Kashevaroff?
STATEMENT OF DON KASHEVAROFF, PRESIDENT, SELDOVIA
VILLAGE TRIBE, AND PRESIDENT, ALASKA NATIVE TRIBAL
HEALTH CONSORTIUM
351
counter English, and they have to be with us. They have unknown
areas that they have to live in. They lose track of their families.
They are removed from their family. Many of them just refuse to
come in for care. So by having a home health care-based system
where we are able to get out there and provide the services to them
like the rest of the country has realized, will modernize IHS and
bring us up into where we should be, and be able to provide better
health care at a lower price. So we are very supportive of the home
health care provisions in there, Senator.
I would also like to touch on the Federal Tort Claims Act coverage. I noticed in Dr. Grims written testimony that they thought
that there might have been an expansion of FTCA coverage. To the
best of my knowledge looking at the Act, there is no change in
FTCA services to ineligible non-beneficiaries. The language does
not increase any change in it.
What we are faced with with Federal tort claims coverage is that
we provide a service, and if we do not have Federal tort claims coverage, we have to take money out of our contracts support costs or
a direct-service budget to pay for insurance that the government or
IHS did not have to pay for before. So when our tribes take over
programs, we have to have coverage. If we do not have coverage,
we have to pay an insurance provider. The amount is staggering
that we have to take out of our direct services budget.
In ANTHC alone, if we had to provide insurance for everybody,
we would lose about four or five specialty providers. We have very
many specialty docs, and we would have to basically let them go
and take the money and buy insurance. We do not want to be in
a situation where we end up doing that. So I am actually puzzled
a bit by Dr. Grims written testimony that the Administration has
these concerns that we are expanding coverage because we just do
not see it, and maybe they can tell us later on where they see those
concerns at.
Real quick, also negotiated rulemaking is in the S. 1057. The
Tribal Self-Government Advisory Committee is very supportive of
negotiated rulemaking. We have found in the past that when we
implemented title V of the ISDEAA that it worked extremely well.
They even gave us awards for how well it worked, that we were
able to get IHS in the room, and the tribes in the room. The tribes
are delivering the health care out there and we are encountering
a lot of things that IHS does not have to encounter. We have the
understanding of how to provide health care out in the country. By
working together, we are both able to understand the rules and put
the rules down on paper so we can work better in the future. It
has helped tremendously, us both having the same common understanding.
I also wanted to mention about the dental health aide therapists.
I know we are going to have a panel on that pretty quick. Alaska
Native Medical Center, which is managed by the Alaska Native
Tribal Health Consortium and by South Central Foundation, we
strongly support dental health aide therapists. Without question,
that is our answer to our crisis that we are having in Alaska. I
grew up in a village that luckily had a dentist come every 6 months
from Anchorage. And it was the same dentist, so he knew me, and
I got decent care.
352
People are concerned that there will not be good care. Well, these
dental health aide therapists are sent out to school on it, and for
2 years they are down getting trained to do what they are going
to do. I personally have had times when dentists maybe did not do
as good a job on me as I wished they would have, and I had to go
in for follow-up care. So I think it really comes down to the individual person whether you are going to get a quality dentist or quality
care or not. We have a huge crisis in bush Alaska. If you go to a
village of 100 or 200 people, you are not going to have a dentist
wanting to live there. Even if you have a volunteer come in once
a year, it is not going to provide the services the folks need.
I personally would love to have a DHAT work on my teeth, just
as I go to a nurse practitioner and a physicians assistant for care.
I have no problem doing that.
Finally, I wanted to mention that the tribes want to have, fundamentally we want to look at S. 1057 and make sure that it does
not regress from anything in current law. There was one instance
that we found in section 403, which is the current law section 206,
where Indian health programs may only bill third-party payers for
reasonable charges as determined by the Secretary. This is a
change. Our concern is by making the Secretary figure out what
the reasonable charges are is going to increase the bureaucracy extensively, as opposed to current practice where we bill under current practice methods.
So I do want to thank you for holding this hearing, Mr. Chairman, and hopefully trying to move this legislation forward. I am
here to answer any questions.
Thank you.
[Prepared statement of Mr. Kashevaroff appears in appendix.]
Senator ENZI. Thank you.
Chairman Brannan.
STATEMENT OF RICHARD BRANNAN, CHAIRMAN, NORTHERN
ARAPAHO BUSINESS COUNCIL
Mr. BRANNAN. Good afternoon, Senator Enzi. Thank you for asking me to come and testify.
I come from the Wind River Reservation, carrying a very heavy
heart because of the suffering, the pain, that children and older
people are going through on our reservation. I want to thank you
personally for asking me to come here, and giving us a voice.
There are many statistics that justify the need for improving
health care on the Wind River Reservation and Indian country in
general. I have listed a number of them in my written statement
and I know you hear them from many others. But what I would
like to do is spend my time here today to try to put a face on the
problem that we are faced with every day on the reservation.
My testimony here today is in honor of Francis Brown, a respected elder and ceremonial leader of the Northern Arapaho
Tribe, and Marcella Hope Yellow Bear, a baby, both of whom died
needlessly because of lack of funding. Both of them suffered terribly before their untimely deaths. Francis had four brain tumors.
He went to IHS for assistance. He was told there was no funding
to help him to get the care he needed. He went home, suffered and
died. Marcella Hope Yellow Bear was 18 months old when she died.
353
Her entire short life was one of torture and pain. According to the
newspaper accounts, she had an open hole through her chin, numerous broken bones, and burns on her body and the bottoms of
her feet. She was found hanging from a coat hook in a closet. The
police found her that way. Physically abused and tortured, her
whole life was nothing but pain.
When I did hear, it was like somebody shooting my heart with
an arrow, and part of my soul died when I heard that. Both of
these could have been prevented. The system and all of us failed
them because of lack of adequate funding. For his entire life,
Francis Brown was one of the cultural and ceremonial leaders and
elders of our tribe. Among his many contributions, he helped preserve the medicine wheel up in the Big Horn National Forest and
other sacred sites. His early loss robbed not only his family, but
our tribe of his culture and ceremonial knowledge.
Marcella was a beautiful and innocent little baby, just so beautiful I cannot describe how pretty she was. She was also the hope
of our future. That is our future, our children. In our tribe, we believe children are sacred and we hold onto them because they are
not tainted by the world and they are a blessing from God. Yet she
was killed by her own parents, both members of our tribe, because
of their addiction to methamphetamine. Those drugs and others,
including alcohol, are the scourge of our reservation in Indian country.
As you can see from these two painful examples, we need funding for both prevention and treatment. I am here today to give my
support to S. 1057, but also to remind you of the need to fully fund
it and to remind you of the trust responsibilities of the United
States to American Indian tribes.
Also, the Almighty gave me a vision where I saw this beautiful,
wonderful white house with a bright picket fence, immaculately
maintained yard, with a swing, a play area full of children. I am
sure people have experienced children full of joy, full of happiness,
smiling, seen them dressed in their Sunday best on Easter Sunday
with their little beautiful socks and dresses and healthy and smiling, and just shrilling with happiness. That is the vision the Almighty gave me of the Northern Arapaho children and our people.
I do know that this committee has the ability to make that vision
come true for the Arapaho people, and I ask for your help. I thank
you for allowing me to testify here today.
[Prepared statement of Mr. Brannan appears in appendix.]
Senator ENZI. Thank you.
Mr. Forquera.
STATEMENT OF RALPH FORQUERA, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR,
SEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARD
354
I am an enrolled member of the Juaneno Band of California Indians, which is a State-recognized tribe from the San Juan
Capistrano region of Southern California.
The Seattle Indian Health Board is a private nonprofit community health center established in 1970 as a free clinic in what was
then an old U.S. Public Health Service hospital, so we are celebrating our 35th anniversary this year. We are currently under a contract and hold several grants from the Indian Health Service under
title V of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act. We are one of
34 such nonprofit Indian-controlled corporations located in 41 cities
and 19 States around the country that contract with the Indian
Health Service under title V.
About 20 of the 34 existing programs provide some level of direct
care. The remaining 14 programs provide health education, information, referral assistance and other services designed to improve
access to health care. In addition, urban Indian health organizations play an important cultural role in many cities by offering programs and services that are culturally appropriate and socially acceptable to the wide array of Indian people living in cities. For example in Seattle we serve Indian people from over 150 American
Indian tribes and Alaska Native villages each year.
The role of providing an identifiable and culturally acceptable
place in American cities for Indian people is an often overlooked effect of these programs that in many ways has become an essential
part of the healing process for Indian people who often feel abandoned and isolated in American cities. According to the 2000 census, the majority of Indian people are now living in American cities. Over 70 percent of Americans who self-identify as American Indian alone or mixed race on the census are living in American cities.
The trend toward urbanization has been steady since the 1950s
when the policy of this Nation was to relocate Indian into cities in
an ill-fated attempt at assimilation. Over 160,000 people were directly affected by the relocation and termination policies. There remains a sizeable number of urban Indians who carry an emotional
scar of this experience with them. As a result, that experience
greatly influences their behaviors and their ability to trust government institutions, including oftentimes our own.
Little is known about the overall health status of urban Indians
across the Nation. While the Urban Indian Health Program has
been a part of the Indian Health Service for nearly 30 years, only
recently have formal efforts to document the health of urban Indians been attempted.
The lack of available data has made it difficult for us to defend
the need for help in addressing the growing health crisis among
urban Indians. However, in March of 2004, the Urban Indian
Health Institute released a first report documenting for the public
the severe health disparities among urban Indians. Using data
from the National Centers for Health Statistics and the 1990 and
2000 U.S. census data, that we know is woefully inadequate for
urban areas, the report still found significantly higher rates of illness and identified multiple known risk factors that likely contributed to these findings.
355
The report brought greater attention to the plight of urban Indians and helped us to begin to build interest in looking at the
health of this population. The report documented for the first time
our anecdotal assertion that urban Indians were experiencing illhealth in disproportionate numbers. Our principal partner in this
work to date is the Indian Health Service, which has now included
us as one of the 10 Indian Health Service-funded regional tribal epidemiology centers, ours being the only one that focuses specifically
on urban Indians and is on a nationwide basis.
Title V, the urban Indian health section of the Indian Health
Care Improvement Act, provides the critical link in recognizing
that Indian country encompasses both reservation and urban communities. The 34 urban Indian health organizations reflect the nature of their local communities. They offer not only services, but a
place of Indian identity that is frequently lacking for Indian people
in American cities. In the broadest sense of healing, finding a place
of belonging and acceptance can have a powerful and positive effect
on the health of Indian people.
Our ability to focus on Indian people and not be encumbered by
the restrictive nature of limiting services to federally recognized
tribal members adds to our capacity to heal wounds also. Title V
is the only authority that specifically defines the health care role
for the Indian Health Service in addressing the needs of urban Indians. For this reason, title V is an essential tool in assuring that
urban Indians are not forgotten as a group of Americans in need
of health improvement.
In the request for my participation in the hearing today, two specific questions were posed to me. The first deals with the extension
of Federal tort claims protection for urban Indian programs. The
second concerns an issue that periodically has been brought to our
attention by the Department of Justice regarding equal protections
provisions of the Constitution and the fact that urban Indians are
not subject to tribal governments with self-governance authority.
With regard to the Federal Tort Claims Act issue, similar protections have been extended to community health centers through the
Public Health Services Act. Those of us who receive funding
through the Bureau of Primary Health Care are already eligible for
FTCA protection. It would seem to me that extending this protection to urban Indian health programs would add minimal risk to
the government. Inclusion could save considerable expense for
those programs who are now purchasing private liability insurance
for support for their work. The resulting savings could be used to
provide needed services.
It should also be noted that the title V program is truly crafted
using the community health centers as a model. So therefore the
extension of the privilege of FTCA for another group of federally
sponsored safety net providers seems a fair and equitable action.
With regard to the Department of Justices concern about equal
protection matters, I first need to state that I am not an attorney
nor am I professionally trained in this area. However, it seems to
me that the enactment of title V defined a special class of health
care provider similar to various arrangements made through other
Federal programs like the Federally Qualified Health Center Pro-
356
gram under the Bureau of Primary Health Care and disproportionate share hospital payment structure under CMS and others.
Clearly, the Federal Government has a rational basis for providing funding, tax breaks and other benefits it deems to be in the interest of the Government or society in general. That rational basis
should not allow such distinctions to withstand an equal protections challenge.
In the case of urban Indian health programs, the Congress has
a clear and rational basis for its decision to provide programs, services and funding to urban Indians. After all, it was the ill-conceived
policies of relocation and termination that led to the removal of
large numbers of Indian people from reservations to cities. Congress dealt with Indians as a special class of citizens then, and it
clearly can and should so do as it tries to rationally address the
consequences of those policies.
The structure of the title V program, that of using a nonprofit
Indian-controlled corporate structure, offers the full benefits of the
self-determination principles called for in President Nixons special
message to Congress in July 1970 that forms the foundation for todays Federal Indian policy. Successful urban Indian health organizations in some respects embody the spirit of self-determination.
Our use of IHS funds to leverage our other public-private resources
to extend our capacity to serve urban Indians is exactly what I believe the authors of title V intended.
It is clear that the Congress has the authority and the will to direct programs to address identified and documented health disparities affecting American Indians and Alaska Natives. In these times
of rapid change in the health care system in America, and the
sharp escalation in the cost of health care, the importance of having organizations devoted to assuring access and quality health
care for Indian people makes good public policy. It is fitting, then,
that the Congress continue this policy by reauthorizing Title V.
Thank you for offering me this opportunity to testify. I would be
happy to answer questions.
[Prepared statement of Mr. Forquera appears in appendix.]
Senator MCCAIN. Thank you very much.
Ms. Joseph, what is your response to the Departments view that
the Intra-departmental Council consultation and Tribal Technical
Advisory Groups are sufficient for Indian policy so that the elevation of the director to an assistant secretary is not necessary?
Ms. JOSEPH. Thank you for the question, Mr. Chairman.
The request or the advocacy for the elevation is not a new issue
for tribes, for one thing. It has been around long before this effort
to reauthorize. We feel the deplorable health conditions of our people warrant us to carry out our responsibilities in a different way,
and maybe elevating the issues to a higher level would be a better
approach. We know that status quo is not acceptable.
We think that it is also consistent with the government-to-government relationship in that it is comparable to the assistant secretary that has oversight of the BIA programs in the Department
of the Interior. There is an assistant secretary for Public and Indian Housing in the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
357
We think an agency that has such large responsibilities for Indian people should be at a level where they can collaborate at a
higher level in the Department; be a member at the table when priorities and policies are addressed; be a player in the decisions that
are made when the Departments priorities are established; and be
at a level that ensures that other agencies in the Department are
also considering the needs of American Indians and Alaska Natives.
Senator MCCAIN. What is your response to the Departments
view that we should mandate positions such as the diabetes coordinators within IHS?
Ms. JOSEPH. Mr. Chairman, I thought that was real interesting
a request, to require a mandate when earlier in the testimony
there was an objection to mandates. In particular, that is related
to mandating diabetes coordinators. For the record, I believe all
areas have diabetes coordinators. The one we have in California,
she is wonderful and we like her and she is doing a lot to inspire
us, to prevent and to educate.
But the tribal leaders during this discussion weighed this and
did discuss it. They said, say for instance in five years we have a
major epidemic in our area, and we might want a cardiovascular
disease prevention coordinator or a tuberculosis prevention coordinator. With limited resources, the tribes locally may need to move
resources and have another priority in five years. That was the
wish to have some flexibility for local decisions.
Senator MCCAIN. Thank you.
Mr. Kashevaroff, how would you respond to the views of the
American Dental Association that there is a false concern that in
Alaska that is only a choice between no dental care and some dental care, so that dental health aides are necessary?
Mr. KASHEVAROFF. I believe that anybody that wants to come up
to Alaska and go out to the bush, which we call it, will see that
there is basically no access to dental care out there. Village folks
that live there, if they have a toothache, they have a choice of either waiting six months to a year for a dentist from a regional hub
to arrive, or to get on an expensive plane and fly in. That is what
we are faced with.
We do have some dental care. Dr. Grim mentioned that we have
a 50 percent vacancy rate out in the bush in Alaska. That means
we only have one-half the dentists. If Washington, DC only had
one-half the dentists, you would have a lot of lines around here of
people wanting dental care.
So it is compounded in the fact that you live in a village and
there is no way to access dental care than hop on a plane, which
you cannot always do because we get snowed in for weeks at a time
sometimes. And you only have one-half the dentists out there in
the first place. So we have a very big problem, Mr. Chairman.
Senator MCCAIN. You mention in your statement that negotiated
rulemaking was used in the self-governance regulations. What benefits have you seen in the implementation of the regulations? What
is your response to the Departments concerns that negotiated rulemaking is costly and time-consuming? Were your negotiations costly and time-consuming?
358
Mr. KASHEVAROFF. Mr. Chairman, I was not privy to the budget
of the negotiations. I do not think they are that time-consuming because we actually had a deadline imposed. I know S. 1057 has a
longer deadline imposed. But the little bit of time put up front
saves a lot of time in the end.
By us coming together and working out the issues with the IHS,
the tribes and IHS working out the issues, getting on the same
foothold, understanding the same things, has saved us immensely
right now years later from having tons of lawsuits back and forth
because we cannot agree on what we said. When we are both in
the same room, we negotiated it out and you had negotiations go
where there is give and take, and everybody is satisfied somewhat,
and we were able to achieve that.
As I said earlier, they gave us some kind of awards because we
were so efficient at doing it. I cannot imagine why the Administration is against having negotiated rulemaking after we have been so
successful in the past.
Senator MCCAIN. As has self-governance.
Mr. KASHEVAROFF. Yes.
Senator MCCAIN. Chairman Brannan, in your testimony you
state that addiction to methamphetamine and alcohol are epidemic
on your reservation. What is currently being done to combat the
problem and, in your opinion, will the new comprehensive care behavioral health programs provided in the Act be helpful in any
way?
Mr. BRANNAN. Yes, Chairman; they would be.
Senator MCCAIN. It is epidemic on your reservation?
Mr. BRANNAN. Yes; it is.
Senator MCCAIN. Would you give me a few statistics to describe
that situation?
Mr. BRANNAN. I guess throughout Wyoming it is considered epidemic, even in the State of Wyoming. I do not have the specifics.
Senator MCCAIN. For example, most of your teenagers?
Mr. BRANNAN. What you see is an underlying culture of people,
and we have a number of tribal members coming up and saying,
can you please do something for my family member; they are going
to die, because all they are doing is ingesting poison into their system. There is no place for us to send them. There is no treatment
dollars available for methamphetamine whatsoever. Alcohol is a
significant problem, but methamphetamine is 50 times worse.
Probably their life expectancy is less than 5 years once they take
it for the first time. Typically, they are addicted for life once they
do it, just the first time. There is a significant backlog of patients
that need alcohol treatment alone. In some instances, it takes them
6 months to 9 months just to go to treatment. With an alcoholic,
if they finally identify or I guess understand that they do have a
problem, they confess it, you need to get them to treatment as soon
as possible. It is a constant theme. People are dying from cirrhosis.
Senator MCCAIN. You have a lot of dental problems, I would
think.
Mr. BRANNAN. Oh, yes.
Senator MCCAIN. Because of methamphetamines.
Mr. BRANNAN. Yes, yes. Even without the methamphetamines,
we can only serve 25 percent of our actual need. Our service unit
359
is funded at 51 percent of the level of need funding. Our denial rate
is about three times more than what they approve under a contract
health service budget. We are sending people home that have cancer, saying there is no money for chemotherapy, therefore you have
to die. That is the reality of it.
Senator MCCAIN. Then you must have a problem with teen suicide as well.
Mr. BRANNAN. Yes; we did in the 1980s, there were over 20-some
young people that killed themselves, one right after another. It is
consistent.
Senator MCCAIN. Is that associated quite often with the use of
meth?
Mr. BRANNAN. No; it is mainly associated with the lack of hope
on the reservation, lack of opportunity. What we are doing right
now is we are trying to develop a boys and girls club to give them
some type of outlet. But the main thing is prevention on the reservation. Right now, the lack of funding within IHS is so significant we cannot even do prevention. We have to wait until somebody is sick or almost dying because the funding is so inadequate.
What we need is preventive health dollars. We can work with our
children. We can get them to exercise. We can get them to have a
vision for their future, hope. But right now, we do not have that
resource available.
Senator MCCAIN. Mr. Forquera, is your clinic the only urban
clinic doing epidemiologic studies on urban Indians?
Mr. FORQUERA. It is currently, Senator. We actually established
the Urban Indian Health Institute out of frustration on my part.
Nobody was doing work to directly address the issue of urban Indians. Shortly after we established the organization, Dr. Trujillo, who
was then the director of the Indian Health Service, who had had
some experience working in the urban Indian community, helped
to find some resources to help us set up the epidemiology side of
the research element of the program.
We have been struggling since we have had no directed resource
in order to be able to track the health of urban Indians, and the
fact that a lot of our data has to come from local municipalities or
from other institutions that sometimes do and sometimes do not
collect information that is Indian-specific. We have been having to
go and develop those databases in order to be able to do the work
that we are doing. We are in the process of doing that now, and
I think are making progress, but we are also finding tremendous
obstacles because of resource and other problems.
Senator MCCAIN. Many of your patients are in Seattle due to the
policies of relocation and termination. Do you maintain contacts
with the tribes in which these individuals may be members?
Mr. FORQUERA. A large number of our clients are in fact enrolled
members of their tribes. We also see a number of Indian people
who are members of terminated tribes. We see a few Canadian Indians who come down. And then we are also identifying an awful
lot of Indians who were adoptees or children of adoptees or people
that had been displaced from their nativeness not only in the
1950s, but prior to that.
One of the great advantages of the work that we do and one of
the fun things that we do is helping people re-link themselves up
360
to their nativeness. It is amazing the power of that experience for
the individual and how good that makes us as an institution feel
that we can help people reconnect with their roots and help them.
They then become great supporters of the organization. They get
services from us. They help the community by using their skills as
part of the community. It is a wonderful thing.
Senator MCCAIN. Chairman Brannan, where is the nearest city
or metropolitan area to your tribal lands?
Mr. BRANNAN. Mr. Chairman, we have two cities. One is Lander,
WY. That is approximately 24 miles from Fort Washakie. The other
town is called Riverton, WY.
Senator MCCAIN. Are there problems with drugs and teen suicide
in those non-Indian areas?
Mr. BRANNAN. It is not as prevalent, but the meth problem is
throughout the State, especially within Fremont County where the
reservation is located.
Senator MCCAIN. Are there meth labs on your reservation?
Mr. BRANNAN. Well, a lot of it I believe is foreigners from old
Mexico. They did have a drug bust, and I think they had 250
pounds of methamphetamine.
Senator MCCAIN. That is a lot of doses.
Mr. BRANNAN. Yes; it is.
Senator MCCAIN. Well, it is a national problem, as you know, but
it also seems to be most concentrated in lower-income areas, and
naturally that means Indian country. At least we would see some
benefits from passage of this act, wouldnt you think?
Mr. BRANNAN. Yes; it would help us significantly.
Senator MCCAIN. I thank the witnesses. I thank you for your patience today. I apologize for this back and forth shuttle as we try
to finish up our voting on the Department of Homeland Security.
I can tell you at least we passed on amendment yesterday that directs funding directly to the Indian tribes, so it does not have to
go through the State and local authorities. So a small benefit.
Thank you for all you do. Thank you for your good work. We look
forward to seeing you again.
This panel is adjourned.
Now, our last panel is Mary Williard, DDS, deputy director of the
Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corporation in Bethel, AK; and Robert
M. Brandjord, DDS, who is the president-elect of the American
Dental Association in Washington, DC.
Dr. Williard, welcome. Maybe out of pure curiosity, where is
Bethel, AK located, in relation to, say, Anchorage?
Ms. WILLIARD. We are about 450 air miles west of Anchorage.
Senator MCCAIN. And the population is?
Ms. WILLIARD. In Bethel itself, about 6,000 to 7,000, depending
on the time of year.
Senator MCCAIN. What is it in January? [Laughter.]
Ms. WILLIARD. Probably around 6,000.
Senator MCCAIN. And in August?
Ms. WILLIARD. More like 7,000.
Senator MCCAIN. Some come to the great State of Arizona in the
wintertime, and we are always glad to have them.
I thank the Chairman.
Dr. Williard, who is that with you?
361
Ms. WILLIARD. This is my daughter. Her name is Suskwok or
Shauna Williard.
Senator MCCAIN. You are welcome to be here. Do you have written testimony? [Laughter.]
Thank you. She is welcome here, Dr. Williard.
Ms. WILLIARD. Thank you.
STATEMENT OF MARY WILLIARD, DDS, YUKON KUSKOKWIM
HEALTH CORPORATION DENTAL CLINIC
362
Alaska Natives and have been in our clinic for about 6 years now
providing services. I have looked at every aspect of their service
and their skills. I have found them to be quite skilled at what they
are doing. They learned well during their schooling. They have
taught our dentist, actually, some new materials and information
that they learned in school.
One of the other things that I do during my time in YKHC is I
have observed the new dentists coming in from dental school. I
have to work with them and bring them up to par with the other
dentist on our staff. What I can say is comparing dental school
graduates with our dental therapists is that I have seen that the
skills are equal.
Hearing Dr. Grim say, sort of hesitate whether he would let a
dental therapist work on his own teeth or his own children, I am
not surprised. Most dentists are very picky about where they go.
I do not know that I would Dr. Grim work on my teeth. I have
never seen what he can do. [Laughter.]
But I can tell you that my children and I have been treated by
the therapists, and I have no problem with that because I have
seen what they can do and I believe that they are very well
trained. They provide a good service.
I look forward to allowing them to go out to the villages once
they are certified and working in a general supervision capacity
with the dentist in Bethel. One of the things that I really think is
important about this is that we will have very competent dental
providers in the villages with the people on a daily basis, so that
not only will the people out there be able to see a dentist maybe
once a year, but they will actually be able to see one when they
need one, a dental provider.
They will be able to see the therapist at the school, at the basketball games, mostly, in the villages, and be able to talk to them in
the grocery store and say, you know, gee, I know you told me I
need to brush my teeth all the time, but what can I do when I cannot afford a toothbrush? And maybe when they are deciding what
to purchase at the store, they can, you know, what were you saying
about the diet soda compared to the regular soda?
Those kind of things are really important when you are talking
about trying to change a communitys habits about oral health.
Daily presence is a much more effective way of changing habits in
a population than the itinerant-type approach that has been utilized in the past. So I think that is a very strong aspect of our program.
I do not think volunteer programs will work. I am not saying
that I do not want to see volunteers come. Please come. Please do
as much volunteer work as you can. I think that would be great.
I do think that they do not provide the continuity of care that will
address the issues that we need and to help build a strong prevention program.
The drill-and-fill model is still the old volunteer model as well.
When you come in and you see patients, you drill and fill and you
just get back out, and you have not made that connection with the
patient. It just has not worked.
One of the things that I have seen as well is that village residents have long, 30 years there have been community health aides
363
in the villages. And when a doctor comes out to the village and
talks to the patients and tells them what they know, the patients
will listen, but when the doctor leaves the room, the patient turns
around and asks the community health aide, you know, is that
right? What can you tell me? So the trust is there when the people
are there in the communities.
One of the things about the Dental Health Aide Program is that
the main focus is that we are looking at prevention. However, the
dental health aide therapists are going to be there to help us deal
with the problems that are already existing. You have already
heard there is a very large problem with dental decay in our areas,
unmet needs. Even if Dr. Grim was able to recruit dentists to our
area to fill all the available positions, that is not going to meet our
dental needs. A study in 1991 was done in Alaska that showed that
even if the number of dentists in Alaska was doubled at that time,
it would still take 10 years to meet the needs.
So recruiting dentists to fill positions is not the only answer. We
need all the help we can get. That does not mean we are looking
for substandard care. That means we are looking for good quality
care and we have come up with a method to do that. The dental
health aides or dental therapists have been working in a number
of countries for years and have a very good track record. In Canada, over 30 years of practicing; in Saskatchewan, being regulated
by the dental profession, there has never been any merited claim
against a dental therapist, and they provide the same level of services and more than we will allow under our Dental Health Aide
Program.
So in closing, well, one other thing I would like to say is that we
do thank Dr. Grim for his letter of support of our program, and we
will have that in our written testimony. We also have e-mails of
written support from the South Central Foundation in Anchorage
that states that they strongly endorse the Alaska Dental Health
Aide Therapy Program.
What I would like to ask you all, Mr. Chairman and the members of these committees is to please listen to the people that live
and work in these communities and refuse to take away our federally recognized right to manage our own health care. Please support S. 1057 of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act, and do
not limit the scope of practice of the dental health aides.
Thank you. I am open to questions.
[Prepared statement of Dr. Williard appears in appendix.]
Senator ENZI. Thank you.
Dr. Brandjord.
STATEMENT OF ROBERT BRANDJORD, DDS, PRESIDENTELECT, AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION
364
Equally important, I must state the American Dental Associations unequivocal opposition to experimenting on Alaska Natives
by allowing non-dentists to perform irreversible dental surgical procedures. This is second-class care. It is unsafe. It is unfair. And
most of all, it is unneeded. It is an admission that those who have
been entrusted with the care of these people have essentially given
up on them. Instead of really focusing on preventing disease, the
solution is to extract it. Alaska Natives deserve better. They deserve high-quality, fully trained, licensed dentists to provide the
care.
They can receive that care if we can break down the bureaucratic
obstacles that are preventing it. Decades ago, Alaska Natives were
almost entirely free of dental decay, but the trend has reversed.
Many Alaska Natives now suffer from often severe untreated dental disease. Deterioration is due partially to the transition from the
traditional subsistence diet to processed sugary foods and beverages; partly to the lack of oral health education and proper selfcare; and partly to inadequate access to appropriate dental care.
Alarmed at the declining oral health of its constituents, the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium has resorted to the desperate
measure of deploying dental therapists to extract teeth, drill out
cavities, and do pulpotomies, which are like a root canal. With only
18 to 24 months of post-high school training, these well-intended,
hard-working people do not know what they do not know. They are
not prepared to routinely perform these procedures safely. Dentists
perform thousands of procedures every day with such expertise
that the public views them as routine or simple. But there is no
simple surgical procedure. I know this. I spend a great deal of
every working day removing teeth.
For example, extracting a tooth can lead to serious and in some
cases life-threatening complications. It can lead to chronic and
acute infection, injury to adjacent teeth, gums, and bone, including
fractured or broken jaws, displacement of teeth, parts of teeth, or
foreign objects into the airway, gastrointestinal tract, and sinuses;
even severe life-threatening breathing or airway problems.
Proponents of the dental therapist plan argue that there are only
two choices: Second-class care or no care. This is not true. Our
written testimony includes an alternative model that builds on the
current dental delivery system by making it more efficient. The authors include the dental director of the Alaska Native Medical Center in Anchorage. Central to this plan is the creation of the new
mid-level aide called a community oral health provider. They can
be trained in Alaska and not in New Zealand. These communitybased dental aides could provide the patient education and preventive services that ultimately are the best and perhaps the only way
to end the epidemic of dental disease that plagues Alaska Natives.
Despite our attempts to help, we have continually run into a bureaucratic brick wall of opposition by those who, by their own admission, are so vested in the therapist position that they will not
consider any alternative.
Mr. Chairman, the public health agencies who took responsibility
for providing care for Alaska Natives have been unable to meet
their own goals. Dentistry did not create this situation, but we are
willing to help remedy it. But therapists are a big step in the
365
wrong direction. Rather, we need a dental health aide to provide
education, prevention and appropriate services in every village. We
need a more efficient system to provide the needed care safely and
effectively. We need less redtape.
We urge the Senate to adopt the language offered on the House
side by Chairman Young which supports dental aides, but precludes the use of therapists to perform irreversible dental surgical
procedures.
I want to thank you for your time and attention, and I would be
happy to answer any questions.
[Prepared statement of Dr. Brandjord appears in appendix.]
Senator ENZI. Thank you.
I thank both of the people who testified. The one who is probably
the leading expert among Senators among this would be Senator
Murkowski from Alaska. I will defer to her for questions.
Senator MURKOWSKI. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I appreciate the
opportunity to lead off with the questions. I unfortunately will have
to be excusing myself after this because I have to get over to the
energy conference, so I am splitting my time.
I do not know. I am not the resident Senate expert because I
spend a lot of time in the dental chair, but I do spend a lot of time
traveling around my State and do know that in terms of health
care issues and the area where we are so lacking is in dental
health care. Dr. Williard, I appreciate your bringing your daughter
here. As a mom with kids that are spending a lot of time in the
dental chair nowadays, it is at this age where we are able to make
a difference with our kids.
Unfortunately, our Native children out in the villages are the
ones that are suffering most. They are suffering because of the
change in diet, as you have indicated Dr. Brandjord, and because
of other changes as we are evolving as a new State, as a society
that is moving from a subsistence lifestyle to a cash economy. It
is hurting out kids teeth. As a consequence, it is hurting us as
adult. It is putting a stress and a strain on the whole health care
system.
What is the answer? The answers are very, very difficult. I, for
one, I have a real hardship when people say that we are experimenting on Alaska Natives by providing them with something. We
are not experimenting. We are trying to do something to take that
first step to give the care that is so necessary and is so needed. I
appreciate your testimony, Dr. Williard. I could tell that it was
coming from the heart and very unscripted. You are living there.
You are talking with the people and you know that when you have
a doctor come to town who just blasts in and blasts out, the information that was left with you while you were sitting in that dentist
chair goes out the window with that dentist.
I know because I was raised in a tiny community where the doctor came to town every other week. It was good news for my family
that my mother was not pregnant that year because she did not
have to worry about whether or not she was going to deliver the
baby by herself or whether the doctor was going to be in town. So
we know what happens when we do not have that continuity of
care. There are lapse. There are gaps.
366
So we have to do something. We have to do something. The program that we are talking about here today is novel. It is new and
as a consequence it is raising concerns.
I guess I would like to primarily direct my questions to you, Dr.
Brandjord. When the first class of dental health aide therapists
graduated from the University of Otago in New Zealand, the Associate Dean Tom Kardos, who himself is a dentist, said the following. He said:
The dental therapist will be able to provide oral health care, including undertaking procedures such as fillings and extractions, along with educating their communities in good oral health care and habits in accordance with the course they have
taken.
367
So we really think that is a very valuable resource and we agree
on all of those things. In fact, when you look at our proposal, that
is exactly what it is about. Then we add the community oral health
care provider who coordinates all these efforts among a number of
villages and a population base so that when the dentist comes to
that community, villagers will have continuity of care through the
dental health aide that is there, and dentists can be more efficient
by providing care that is a broad spectrum of care at that time. In
fact our program, when you look at it, uses the Anchorage Hospital
model, and with this efficient system to provide the care, their productivity increased many-fold. In fact, in the last year of implementation, their production increased over 100 percent, and over a 3year period of time, over 300 percent.
So we believe that there are four things that we have to do. First
of all, we have to fill up our quotas of Indian Health Care dentists.
The American Dental Association has been to Congress and we
have supported increasing the loan forgiveness payments, which
seems to be a big advantage for getting students out of dental
school going into the Indian Health Service. In fact, when we met
Dr. Grim and one of his assistants, Chris Halliday from Indian
Health Service, he said he believed if he had loan forgiveness for
every slot in the Indian Health Service for dental positions, he
could fill them. So he would need the funding for that. That is one
thing that we want to do.
Second is prevention. I talked about that. Prevention is the foundation for dental care.
Third, are the volunteers. We want to get the volunteers back up
into Alaska.
Senator MURKOWSKI. How do we get them there? We have the
greatest State on Earth and we cannot get professionals to come
out to our villages. We might get them to come out and give us 1
week or 2 weeks on either side of a fishing trip, but we need care
and the care is not just when the fish are running. We have to figure out a way.
Mr. BRANDJORD. It is interesting you say that because our volunteers went up there in the dead of winter. They were not there during fishing season. They understand they are not going up there on
a vacation. They are going to work. We are putting together, and
are now in the process right now of hiring a full-time individual at
the American Dental Association to work with finding volunteers
and setting up the coordination of getting these volunteers into Indian villages and into Alaskan villages. We are trying to get the
care where it is needed.
In fact, when we were putting this together, it is interesting that
we talked to other different health care providers who have volunteer programs. The great State of Alaska is a little different than
some other States because when we talked to the American College
of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, they have a volunteer program
and their members sign up to participate in these programs to go
out specifically through the Indian Health Service. They have given
up on going to Alaska because of the credentialing problems. They
are different than anyplace else.
So one thing that this Committee could do is to bring about a
central certification process that could be used for volunteers to go
368
into these areas to help. Our volunteers that went, it has been a
year and a half now, those that went then have to reapply and get
recredentialed now. If they went to one village for one week and
another village for another week, they would have to be
recredentialed. That is inappropriate.
Senator MURKOWSKI. It is.
Mr. BRANDJORD. When we talked to the Joint Commission on Accreditation, of Healthcare Organizations those people say we could
work with a much simpler form where there would be temporary
privileges less paperwork.
Senator MURKOWSKI. We want to work with you on that
credentialing.
Mr. BRANDJORD. We would love to work with you.
Senator MURKOWSKI. From what I understand, we have extended
that offer to kind of work through some of these issues on the
credentialing. To the best of my knowledge, you have not taken us
up on the offer, so we would hope that we would be able to. That
seems like one that we ought to be able to figure through.
Mr. BRANDJORD. I would totally agree with you. It is interesting
that I have a letter here from a dentist in Alaska. If I may read
it, it is very short. It is dated May 25:
On or about February 11 of this year, I submitted an application to participate
in dental project backlog. During the first week of April of this year, I was
fingerprinted as part of the application process. It is now almost June. I understand
there are building transition issues on your part, but what is the status and fate
of my efforts to help alleviate the access issues in the villages?
So yes, we have made that effort, but we are not getting a response on the other side. I do not know how we do that. But if
there is some way to aid us, and when we went out there, we did
not just go out on our own. We went with the Indian Health Service dentists and we worked with them. We believe that that is not
a solution that is going to last forever, but if we can get them over
this backlog of dental disease, we believe we can make a difference.
Senator MURKOWSKI. How many dentists do you think you are
going to be able to or would have to recruit to be able to assist in
this effort, full-time dentists?
Mr. BRANDJORD. For full-time dentists, I do not know. That
would have to be through the Indian Health Service. I am not sure.
But last year at our House of Delegates, which has 360 members,
on 1 day, we handed out a paper, just asking how many would volunteer for a minimum of 2 weeks to go to Alaska. We had 140 volunteers.
Senator MURKOWSKI. Well, I am not meaning to be the negative
nabob here, but one of our big problems is that most of these villages, there is no hotel. There is no bed and breakfast. You are
there and you might sleep at the home of the community health
practitioner or maybe in the gym. It makes it tough on people. So
we have some issues that just make this tough. We need to know
that we have a realistic timeframe that we are dealing with, and
that we are dealing with enough numbers that we can actually
make a difference.
We need to get through this backlog, but we recognize that kids
are born every day, and they are going to have the next generation
369
of dental problems. So this is not just something that we can get
on top of the wave now and be clear with.
Mr. Chairman, I am going to have to submit the rest of my questions for the record. I really apologize because this is extremely important. I think you can tell that I want to do something. I hear
that you want to do something. We certainly know that from the
Alaska perspective, those professionals who are giving so much
every day want to make something work.
I do not want to get in a situation where I feel it is the Dental
Association saying this is our turf and nobody else can come onto
it. This is not about turf. This should be about the health and wellbeing of Alaska Native people. If we can put together a program
that provides for continuity of care, that is good and safe and
works, we have the benefits of telemedicine where you can be talking to your real-live doctor in Boston and working on a procedure.
We have made incredible advancements in the State with telemedicine.
I would like to think that we can work through some of these
issues so that we do not have dentists saying there is no other way
except for us to come up, and as Alaskans knowing that Shauna
here is going to be able to see a dentist two weeks out of every
year, and hope that her toothache is during that 2-week time period. So work with us.
Mr. BRANDJORD. We will work with you. We realize the epidemic
of dental disease that is there. We want to do nothing more than
help to resolve that issue. But to resolve that issue, to keep doing
fillings and extractions will not resolve it. What will resolve it is
to have good preventive care. We can accomplish that with the dental health aides.
In regards to your statement about the facilities and the bed and
breakfasts up there, yes, the bed and breakfast for every one of our
volunteers up there was bringing their own sleeping bag and sleeping on the floor of the clinic. So yes, we are familiar with that, but
they are still willing to go back. They are that dedicated. I think
that is something that is hard for people to perceive.
I thank you for your concern.
Senator MURKOWSKI. It is also hard for them to give more than
2 weeks, and that is one of our biggest problems. That dedication,
that passion is there and they will come up and they will give, and
it is extremely generous. We do not want to denigrate that generosity, but there is a recognition that there are 50 other weeks of the
year that are without any kind of care. So we will work on filling
those gaps.
Mr. Chairman, thank you very much.
Senator ENZI. Thank you.
Senator Isakson.
Senator ISAKSON. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Yesterday, I had one of those irreversible dental procedures
known as a root canal, so I am having a tough time talking about
this subject. [Laughter.]
Senator ISAKSON. I am honored to be here and appreciate both
your testimonies. I am sorry I was late for the other panels.
Dr. Williard, you are a dentist and I take it you oversee a regional plan. Do you manage the dental health aides?
370
Ms. WILLIARD. Yes; I do.
Senator ISAKSON. I do not want to cut you off, but I want to get
to the end question.
Ms. WILLIARD. Okay.
Senator ISAKSON. And that is a full-time program for the Native
Alaskans.
Ms. WILLIARD. Yes.
Senator ISAKSON. How many dentists and how many dental
health aides are in that program?
Ms. WILLIARD. We have nine dentists in the Bethel area. We
have two dental therapists, and we have nine primary dental
health aides.
Senator ISAKSON. Okay. Here is my question, and I did not get
a chance to read. I take it this S. 1057 has a scope of practice component to it. What new scope of practice are these therapists or
aides going to be allowed to do under this bill that they cannot do
now?
Dr. WILLIARD. There is no new scope of practice that they would
be able to do under S. 1057. What the American Dental Association
would like to see done is to have this bill modified so that it takes
away the rights that we have to practice as we are doing right now.
Senator ISAKSON. Okay. Now, Dr. Brandjord just referred to the
program they had recommended. They have suggested a program
which I take it drew the line on scope of practice for the therapist
and the aides. Is that correct?
Dr. WILLIARD. Yes.
Senator ISAKSON. You said you have nine dentists there in your
program now?
Ms. WILLIARD. Yes.
Senator ISAKSON. Then that is not enough dentists to do the irreversible dental procedures?
Ms. WILLIARD. We have 15 dental positions in our area, so we
have 6 that are vacant right now. As I have said before, filling
those vacancies does not actually provide enough treatment ability
to meet the needs. So even if we were to get 100 percent filling of
those positions, it still would not meet the needs that are out there.
That would just meet the criteria that have been set by what is
able to be funded by the IHS and by our corporation.
Senator ISAKSON. One of the issues that comes up in many
health professions in scope of practice is a shortage of trained people being the justification to allow a scope of practice possibly beyond the training of others. Are we in that position in Alaska now
where we in effect have people who are trying to do the best they
can, but are not sufficiently trained to do, say, root canals, which
I think take a lot of training after yesterdays experience? I hope
so.
Dr. WILLIARD. You are talking about the dental therapists not
having the training to do that?
Senator ISAKSON. Yes. I am saying, in Alaska are we having to
resort to asking people, with the best of intention, to do procedures
they are not trained for?
Ms. WILLIARD. No; we are not asking them to do procedures they
are not trained for. The dental therapists that we have sent to
training and are training further in our own facilities have a spe-
371
cific scope of practice which limits what they can do in a patient
care setting. That limit will keep them in a practice setting that
utilizes only what their skills are. If a patients care needs get beyond the limits that a dental therapist has been trained to provide,
then they are trained to recognize those limits and refer to a dentist.
The picture that you saw earlier from the ADA, definitely I agree
with them. That is beyond the scope of practice of a dental therapist. That patient would be referred to the hub clinics for treatment. But fortunately, that is not the only kind of patient we see.
We do have a lot of patients that need a little less than that severe
care, and can be seen by the therapists and the procedures that
they are capable and competent of performing.
Senator ISAKSON. Okay. Dr. Williard, in the proposal that the
ADA made, what is it that you do not like about their proposal?
Ms. WILLIARD. They have excluded the use of the therapists.
Senator ISAKSON. Totally? Or just for these irreversible procedures?
Ms. WILLIARD. The therapists are distinguished by the fact that
they can do irreversible procedures. What their suggestion would
do for a therapist is strip them of their ability to provide those
services. They would become basically a primary dental health
aide, which is a health aide that we already have and who we can
train for about a month in Bethel to provide the preventive services
and the fluoride treatments that they are providing already.
So basically, it would be the equivalent of tying a dentists hand
or arm behind their back and asking them to treat a patient. That
is what their proposal would do. We do not say that their proposal
is not okay, for lack of a better word. I think it is a good proposal
in some settings. I think it would be fine to do that Community
Oral Health Practitioner Program in parallel with the Dental
Health Aide Program. Anything that people are willing to do to try
and help provide more services to our area is a good thing as long
as it is well thought out and supported with data.
What I do not agree with is that the American Dental Association is not willing to allow that to happen at the same time as our
Dental Health Aide Program is running. They want us to drop the
program and then pick up this other program. That will not work.
We have seen and looked at all of the studies that show that the
dental therapist is a safe, quality provider. You can look at Gordon
Trueblood from Canada who has done extensive studies on the
quality of care provided by a dental therapist.
In those studies, he has shown that the quality is equal, if not
better, than a dentist in the procedures that a therapist is allowed
to perform. A therapist does not do a whole scope of dental procedures that a dentist would do. Their training is very heavily geared
towards teaching them what their limits are. This is very different
from what you might learn in dental school, where you are taught
all eight different specialties in the dental field. Nobody tells you
that you cannot do something.
Senator ISAKSON. Mr. Chairman, could I have the liberty of asking two more questions?
Senator ENZI. Certainly.
Senator ISAKSON. I know I have gone beyond my time.
372
I have said this before, and am not taking sides here even
though it is going to sound like I am. The dental profession, of all
the health professions, seems to me to have done a remarkable job
of lessening the volume of work because of what they did in preventive health care, fluoridation of the water, and good health
practices. You, Doctor, and the association are to be credited for
that.
It sounds to me like the exacerbation of the problem in Alaska
over the last 10 years is a whole absence of that, or at least a significant one. Otherwise, it may be the change in eating habits, you
referred to people fluoridating and things like that.
If it has been done once in the continental United States, understanding there is a world of difference in Atlanta, Georgia and
Alaska, and where Native villages might be. I know accessibility is
a problem and everything else. I guess I ought to ask the Doctor
a question for a minute, because I have been directing everything
to you.
Is your proposal designed with that goal in mind? If it is, can the
number of trained professionals be available to meet the demand
that exists today, and even would exist if there were some lessening of those problems?
Mr. BRANDJORD. Thank you for your question. First of all, with
the proposal that has been made, using the community oral health
provider, that particular program, and it has been looked at by
these three people in education and then one who is the director
up at the Anchorage dental facility, they estimate that using that
particular program, 85 percent of the individuals within that village could be seen and taken care of in any year. Now, that is in
the paper that has been submitted along with our written testimony.
One other thing in regard to your comments about the scope of
practice of individuals, part of the issue is that the expanded function dental assistants can help do some of the reversible procedures
and that is why they become more efficient. They will have one
dentist per three or four auxiliaries in the Anchorage facility working in up to three chairs at one time so that they can be more efficient and produce more care, and then deliver also more preventive
services.
So yes, there is an expanded scope that is there that can be done,
and yes they can reach more people.
If I can just add one thing. You mentioned fluoridation. There
are fluoridation units in the villages, but they are not activated
right now. Some of it is the CDCs requirements for maintenance.
From our understanding now, we have some new technology that
CDC has and that has been implemented in the tribal villages in
South Dakota where they have remote control of the fluoridation
of the water system that can work.
Senator ISAKSON. Well, I have abused my time. CDC is in my
home State and if you all have any problem with them, you let me
know because you need all the help you can get out there.
Your daughter is beautiful, Dr. Williard.
Ms. WILLIARD. Thank you.
Senator ISAKSON. Thank you for the time, Mr. Chairman.
Senator ENZI. Thank you.
373
Ms. WILLIARD. Could I make one comment about the program,
the community oral health aide program?
Senator ENZI. Certainly.
Ms. WILLIARD. Thank you, sir.
The program, it was written by a panel of people who did include
one of the chiefs from the Anchorage area, Tom Kovalesky. In teleconferences and meetings with the authors of that proposal, and
the dental chiefs of Alaska throughout the State, Dr. Kovalesky
and the other officers did concede that this proposal was probably
not as effective in the rural areas and that it would be more effective in an urban setting.
The situation that we find in our individual villages, having to
fly in by airplane and being spread out with such small populations
in some of these communities, the models that are used in that program do not apply. That is something that the dental directors outside of Anchorage unanimously agree with.
Senator ENZI. Thank you.
I want to thank both of you and all of the other people that have
testified. I apologize for the interruptions. We are still doing votes.
Senator McCain and I have been shifting off and on here so that
we would have somebody chairing and could continue to gather the
information. All of this, of course, builds some testimony that will
be used in furthering the legislation, correcting the legislation,
drafting additional legislation.
There will be more statements submitted by other members of
both committees, and questions that I hope all panelists will take
time to answer. You will not all receive questions because we will
be searching for things that are in your area of expertise or clarifications on what you said in your statement or things that you
may have said today.
Also, members of the panel, if you have some comments in regard to other questions that were not asked, or if you want to expand on the comments that were made, you are perfectly able to
do that, too. The record will remain open for another 10 days to
complete that process.
So I appreciate everyone who has helped out here today and the
hearing is adjourned.
[Whereupon, at 4:55 p.m., the committee was adjourned, to reconvene at the call of the Chair.]
APPENDIX
PREPARED STATEMENT
OF
FOR THE
RECORD
FROM
WASHINGTON
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I appreciate your continued leadership on these issues
which we have been working on for a number of years.
Id also like to thank you for opening this hearing up to our HELP Committee
colleagues. Their expertise in healthcare delivery, will be extremely valuable as we
work together to improve the health and well-being of Native Americans.
I believe reauthorizing the Indian Health Care Improvement Act will help us
begin to close the disturbing health disparity in Indian country and allow us to fulfill the United States obligation for Indian health.
According to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, between 1998 and 2003, industry experts estimate that medical costs grew approximately 1012 percent, while the
IHS funding increases are less than 5 percent annually. When compared to other
Federal health expenditures, its clear that IHS is grossly under funded. We have
a responsibility to take a close look at the healthcare services were providing to this
population and make sure that theyre equitable and adequate.
This issue is particularly important to Washington State. Between 19902000, the
Indian population grew almost by almost 28 percent7.5 percent faster than the
rest of our population. The life expectancy for Indians living in Washington is approximately 4 years shorter than that of the rest of the population, due to factors
that we can impactchronic under funding of the Indian Health Service, the lack
of geographically available health services and the lack of trained providers that are
available to serve the Indian population. We can address these issues for Washington and the rest of Indian country by moving forward with the reauthorization of
this critical legislation.
To give you an idea of how badly this legislation needs to be updated, Ill use the
example of behavioral health services. The current law limits behavioral health
services to those dealing with substance abuse. While substance abuse is a critical
health issue, mental health disorders are not addressed. This is particularly alarming when one looks at the suicide rate of the Indian population91 percent higher
than the rest of the United States. Clearly there is a need for increased attention
to the behavioral health needs of the Indian population.
Im pleased to see the increased focus on preventative health in this bill. While
Indian country is still experiencing a shorter life expectancy than other American
populations, the causes of death have shifted. Today the leading causes of death
among Indian populations are chronic disease rather than infectious disease, communicable diseases. The health disparities that exist among the Indian population
are numerous and unacceptable. They have higher rates of almost every disease and
adverse health condition:
Alcoholism777 percent higher.
TB650 percent higher.
Diabetes450 percent higher.
Accidents208 percent higher.
(375)
376
Pneumonia/influenza52 percent higher.
Suicide rate91 percent higher.
Although the health disparities still exist in Washington and across the country,
we have made progress. I am aware, for example, of our success in the Northwest
in reducing the rate of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, diabetes, HIV/AIDS, cancer
and tobacco use through the use of health promotion and disease prevention programs. Reauthorization would allow for the expansion of facilities construction options, enhance tribal decisionmaking and enhance the ability to recruit, train and
retain health professionals.
The last time this bill was reauthorized was in 1992 and it expired in 2000. Since
then, bills have been proposed every year to no avail. This is a very complicated
issue, its a huge bill but the time has come to fully address the health needs of
the Indian population.
We have a legal and ethical responsibility to provide healthcare to Indians and
this is the perfect opportunity to begin to address ways in which we can improve
the way we do so.
One area of great concern to me is the impact of the Medicare Prescription Drug
Benefit implementation on Indian country. The Tribal Technical Advisory Group
was formed to consult with the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Studies (CMS) on
reimbursement rates and policies. Under the roll-out of the transitional assistance
or, the drug discount card, under the Medicare Modernization Act earlier this year,
we saw many problems in the implementation of this program. Beneficiaries were
often confused about their choices and many didnt know they even had a choice to
make. Like other low-income elders across the country, low-income Indian elders
will experience a gap in prescription drug coverage when their costs exceed the initial $1,500 coverage limit. Most Indians will expect their HIS and Tribal Clinics to
pay for their pharmaceuticals after they fully utilize their prescription drug coverage. However, IHS expenditures will not be counted toward the threshold to qualify for the catastrophic coverage under the drug plan. IHS will have to absorb all
pharmacy costs for Indian elders up to the $3,600 annual limit. I am hopeful that
in consultation with my colleagues on the Senate Finance Committee, we will resolve this inequity.
Another area of grave concern to me is the lack of attention that behavioral
health services in our healthcare delivery system. According to the Indian Health
Service, 13 percent of Indian deaths occur in those younger than 25 years of age
three times that of other populations and the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights
points out that American Indian youth are twice as likely to commit suicide.
Reauthorization is especially important as it provides an opportunity to address
the need for mental health coverage within the IHS. Title VII proposes a comprehensive approach for behavioral health assessment, treatment and prevention.
Under current law, behavioral health provisions are largely limited to substance
abuse treatment and prevention and the issue of mental health is largely
unaddressed.
The current Indian health bill is a product of much collaboration between tribal
leaders, IHS officials and program personnel and its imperative that we look to
these experts during this process.
Id also like to thank Ralph Forquera, the executive director of the Seattle Indian
Health Board, for joining us here today. Each year, the Seattle Indian Health Board
serves over 6,000 individual patients and provides approximately 30,000 patient encounters. While the Seattle Indian Health Board has become quite skilled at providing high quality services with limited funding, theyre currently facing a budget
shortfall of $200,000 for clinic services. We must work to make sure that our providers have the resources they need to provide high quality health care to the Indian
populations all over the country and especially here in Washington.
Im looking forward to hearing of the Seattle Indian Health Boards many accomplishments, especially as they relate to the health needs of urban Indians.
Once again, thank you Mr. Chairman for beginning the reauthorization of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act and for holding this hearing. The time has come
for this bill to finally be reauthorized and I look forward to working with my colleagues in the Senate to make this a reality year.
PREPARED STATEMENT OF HON. BYRON L. DORGAN, U.S. SENATOR FROM NORTH
DAKOTA, VICE CHAIRMAN, COMMITTEE ON INDIAN AFFAIRS
I thank Chairman McCain for his leadership.
I thank my colleagues on the HELP Committee for joining with us in considering
today the Indian Health Care Improvement Act Amendments of 2005. I am particu-
377
larly pleased to note that two of our colleagues from the HELP Committee Senator
Kennedy and Senator Bingamanhave asked to be added as cosponsors of S. 1057.
It is my earnest hope that, by working togethertogether as authorizing committees, and together with the Administration and representatives of Indian country
the Indian Health Care Improvement Act will be reauthorized this year.
I know our witnesses today will provide additional statistics regarding health
needs in Indian country. We cannot, in good conscience, be satisfied with the status
quo like this:
Native American youth are more than twice as likely to commit suicide; in the
Great Plains area the likelihood is as high as 10times.
American Indians and Alaska Natives are 517 percent more likely to die from
alcoholism.
650 percent more likely to die from tuberculosis.
318 percent more likely to die from diabetes.
204 percent more likely to suffer accidental death.
Over the past few months, my colleagues have heard me speak on the Senate floor
about Indian health care in connection with amendments I have offered to the fiscal
year 2006 budget resolution and the fiscal year 2006 Interior appropriations bill. My
amendments proposed to provide an additional $1 billion for programs not only in
the IHS, but also BIA, tribal colleges, water infrastructure.
I have talked on the Senate floor about people in tribal communities who are
hurting and in desperate need of services. Many of these people I know or have
known, or, in the tragic case of Indian youth suicide, whose surviving family members I have met with.
I know this is true, too, for Dr. Grim and the other witnesses who will testify
todayyou all see and hear and experience, every day, the very real need for the
kinds of services and programs and facilities, the kinds of best practices, collaborations and innovations that S. 1057 would authorize for American Indian and Alaska
Native communities. I want to thank each of you who has stuck with this reauthorization process since 1999 and earlier for your persistence and continuing vision.
I want to say that I am particularly pleased with and supportive of the provisions
of title VII of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act Amendments of 2005. This
section of the bill would authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services
through the Indian Health Service, the tribal health programs and the urban Indian
organizationsto develop a comprehensive behavioral health prevention and treatment program. Such a program would emphasize collaboration among alcohol and
substance abuse, social services and mental health programs and would benefit all
age groups.
Since the Committee on Indian Affairs hearing on June 15 on teen suicide prevention, several more youth suicides have occurred on the Standing Rock Reservation in North and South Dakota. The services and programs for Indian youth, in
particular, the training of paraprofessionals, the education of community leaders,
the construction and staffing of new facilities and research that would be authorized
by title VII will make a very real difference in the lives of men and women who
live at Standing Rock, and all Native Americans.
I look forward to the comments today of the Indian Health Service, the tribes and
urban Indian organizations, and others and appreciate your help in improving this
legislation that will provide creative and effective solutions to address the health
needs of Indian people.
PREPARED STATEMENT OF HON. MICHAEL B. ENZI, U.S. SENATOR FROM WYOMING,
CHAIRMAN, COMMITTEE ON HEALTH, EDUCATION, LABOR, AND PENSIONS
Good afternoon. Thank you for coming to todays joint hearing on the Indian
Health Care Improvement Act.
There is no greater challenge before us in the Congress than the work we must
do to continue to improve the quality of the health care that is available to those
living on reservations. Unfortunately, it seems that no matter how much progress
we make, there is always more to do. Todays hearing will enable us to chart our
current progress and discuss what we can do to increase the services that are available to address the physical and emotional problems that continue to plague American Indians and Alaska Natives.
When the Indian Health Care Improvement Act was first signed into law in 1976,
it was written to address the findings of surveys and studies that indicated that the
health status of American Indians and Alaska Natives was far below that of the
general population. It continues to be a matter of serious concern that, as the health
378
status of most Americans continues to rise, the status of American Indians and
Alaska Natives has not kept pace with the general population.
Studies show that American Indians and Alaska Natives die at a higher rate than
other Americans from alcoholism, tuberculosis, auto accidents, diabetes, homicide,
and suicide.
In addition, a safe and adequate water supply and waste disposal facilities, something we all take for granted, isnt available in 12 percent of American Indian and
Alaska Native homesas opposed to 1 percent of the general population. Several
years ago, residents on the Wind River Reservation in Central Wyoming faced a
drinking water shortage that threatened the health and safety of everybody in the
area. Canned drinking water had to be donated to tribal members and local residents. The lack of these basic services makes life even more harsh for these people
and contributes to those already high rates of death.
Coming from Wyoming, I know full well the problems we encounter in the effort
to provide quality health care to all the people of my home State. That is why I
have always made it one of my goals to help bring that perspective to the hearings
and floor debates we have on the issues that affect the people of my State.
When I was first elected to the Senate in 1996 I knew that quality of life issues
on the reservations in Wyoming and throughout the country would continue to be
a top priority of mine. I also knew that, in order to make life better for those living
on the Wind River Indian Reservation specifically, and other reservations nationwide, my staff and I would need to be intensely committed to taking the issues
head-on and looking for creative ways to solve complicated problems.
That is why I put someone on my staff who already had a great deal of experience
with these issues and shared my commitment to act on them. His name is Scotty
Ratliff and he served with me in the Wyoming legislature. I tasked him with the
challenge of helping me to find solutions to the problems on our reservations that
would be both progressive and culturally sensitive.
Tribal leaders are already committed to making things better on their reservations and I congratulate them on their vision and the hard work they have put into
making it a reality. My only question continues to be, How can I help? In the
years since I have been in the Senate I have made numerous trips to the Wind
River Reservation in Wyoming and met and spoke with the residents and tribal
leaders. We all want the same goala better life for those who live there. I am confident that working together we will continue to make the kind of progress we must
make if we are going to find effective and efficient ways to address the problems
that continue to plague those living on our reservations across the country.
As I noted during my visits to the Wind River Reservation, their problems are
not unique to them. To have an impact on all those who live on reservations from
coast to coast, we will need to take a varied approach to address each of these problems separately. Clearly, people of different ages have different problems. A multifaceted approach to solving each of their problems will require a systemic, as well
as a financial approach.
Local, State, and national governments and agencies must work together with
tribal leaders to focus our resources where they will do the most good. That kind
of approach has the greatest chance of being successful.
Earlier this year the HELP Committee held hearings on the nomination of Michael Leavitt to serve as Secretary of Health and Human Services. I believe we are
fortunate to have Michael Leavitt at the helm of an agency that oversees the health
care needs of the people of reservations all across the country. I am also pleased
Dr. Charles Grim is here with us today. Dr. Grim has an important job to do as
the Director of Indian Health Services and he knows firsthand the level of dedication it will take to steadily improve health care for all American Indians. Dr. Grim
has an unmatched understanding of the needs of Native Americans that you cant
get from reading reports and memos from people out in the field. I have every confidence in his willingness and his ability to be an important part of the solution to
the health care needs of those on our reservations and beyond.
Againthe good news iswere making progress. As we do, we continue to find
so much more that needs to be done. How do we best provide the assistance that
is needed effectively and efficiently? That is the challenge that lies before us.
As we begin to hear from our witnesses, I would like to acknowledge and thank
them all for their willingness to share their experiences with us so that we might
craft a more effective bill to address the health care needs of our American Indian
and Alaskan Native population.
I would also like to welcome Richard Brannan, the chairman of the Northern
Arapaho Business Council of Fort Washakie, WY. No one knows better than he does
the problems faced by those living on reservations and by those who rely on the Indian Health Service for their healthcare needs. No one understands better than he
379
does the necessity of making progress in addressing the health disparities experienced by American Indians. Most important of all, no one is more committed than
he is to making a difference in the lives of all those who live on the reservation.
I know he has an important message to share with us based on his experience
and background with all those who live on the Wind River Reservation. I look forward to his comments and those of our entire list of witnesses. Each of you has a
perspective and a point of view to share that only you can provide. I look forward
to hearing a summary of your prepared remarks so we can address the underlying
issues during our question and answer session.
PREPARED STATEMENT
OF
FROM
HAWAII
Thank you Mr. Chairman. I commend the committees for holding this hearing
today.
The status of Indian Health Care has significantly improved over the years and
Indian mortality rates have declined. However when compared to the United States
general population Indians have a higher likelihood of dying from diseases such as
alcoholism [770 percent], tuberculosis [650 percent], AND DIABETES [420 percent].
Life expectancy is also 5 years less than the general population. Preventive health
services are needed more than ever as is increased funding for those programs and
services.
In 1976 the Indian Health Care Improvement Act was enacted into law for the
specific purpose of increasing the health status of native peoples. Since then bills
were introduced in the 106th, 107th, 108th, and 109th congresses. Although these
efforts were disappointing, I commend Congress for continuing to work on these crucial issues.
This bill is critical to Indian country. It authorizes behavioral programs, provides
alternatives for rural dental care, and authorizes the Indian Health Service to provide long-term care, are among the many positive changes that I have seen in this
bill. I believe it is congress obligation to ensure that Native Americans have full
and timely access to health care.
There is some language in the bill that I am concerned about because it may be
detrimental to tribal sovereignty. However I will continue to work closely with my
colleagues.
I commend my colleagues Senators Dorgan and McCain for drafting this legislation. Once again, thank you for holding this hearing.
PREPARED STATEMENT
OF
FROM
I commend Senator McCain, and Senator Enzi for convening this joint hearing on
the Indian Health Care Improvement Reauthorization Act. The Nation has a legal
and moral commitment to provide Native Americansthe Nations first Americanswith the best possible health care, and Im pleased to be a cosponsor of this
important bill.
From the earliest days of colonization that brought infectious diseases to Native
Americans, to the 18th century military conflicts that sought to destroy Native peoples, to the 19th century treaties that sought to confiscate Native lands, to the 20th
century boarding schools that sought to undermine, tribal culture and language, the
history of Native America has often been a shameful part of the history of America.
The Federal Government has long promised better health care to Native Americans in exchange for land. Since at least 1926, the Government has been looking
into the adequacy of such health care, but sadly, many of the inadequacies identified
in the 1920s still exist today.
Decade after decade, Congress refused to give tribes the resources to develop and
operate their own communities. Too often, it was said that Indian peoples did not
have the expertise to invest such resources wisely to conduct their own governments, operate their own businesses, educate their children, or provide health care
to their people. For generations, this reactionary national mentality poisoned the relationships between tribes and the Federal, State, and local governments.
Native Americans are eager to improve the health status of their people. They deserve control of their own destiny, but they require Congressional action to make
their vision a reality, and it is time for us to honor the commitments we made long
ago.
Chronic underfunding of American Indian and Alaska Native health care by the
Federal Government has weakened the capacity of the Indian Health Service, tribal
governments, and the urban Indian health delivery system to meet the health care
380
needs of the American Indian and Alaskan Native population. The Indian Health
Service per capita expenditures for American Indians and Alaskan Natives are onehalf of what is spent for Medicaid beneficiaries, one- third of that spent by the Veterans Administration, and one-half of what the Federal Government spends on Federal prisoners health care.
As a result of inadequate funding, American Indians endure health conditions
most Americans would not tolerate.
Native Americans are 8 times more likely to die from alcoholism, 7 times more
likely to die from tuberculosis, 5 times more likely to die from diabetes, and 50 percent more likely to die from pneumonia or influenza than the rest of the United
States, including white and minority populations.
Native American infants die at a rate 212 times greater than the rate for white
infants.
Native Americans are at a higher risk for mental health disorders than other racial and ethnic groups in the United States.
Their cardiovascular disease rate is twice that of the general population.
Their life expectancy is 71 yearsnearly 5 years less than the rest of the population.
These statistics represent real people who deserve more from the U.S. Government.
The Indian Health Care Improvement Act has been amended many times, but it
was only extended through 2001. It is long past time to reauthorize this act.
Congress has been working to do so for the past 5 years. The current legislation
reflects years of consultation with the Tribal National Steering Committee and
holds great promise for improving the lives of Native Americans through comprehensive public health efforts. Despite widespread support, the bill has not been
brought to the Senate floor for a vote.
A better future is well within our grasp. We have a unique opportunity to make
much more rapid progress on the long journey toward respect for our First Americans. We must bring the Indian Health Care Improvement Reauthorization Act to
the floor. We must pass this legislation. Until every American Indian and Alaskan
Native receives first class health care, we will never give up the fight. I look forward
to this hearing and to the testimony of each of the witnesses.
FROM
ARIZONA,
Good afternoon. The bill before us today, S. 1057, is the latest iteration of the reauthorization of Indian Health Care Improvement Act that has lingered in the Senate for many years. And while there was much debate about the measure at the
end of the last Congress, the need to improve the provision of health care services
for Native Americans is undebatable. I am very heartened that our colleagues from
the HELP Committee under the leadership of Chairman Enzi and Ranking Member
Kennedy have so actively engaged in advancing the legislative process. I appreciate
not only their support, but the expertise and insight that the HELP Committee
brings to the effort.
Nearly 30 years ago, Congress enacted the Indian Health Care Improvement Act
to meet the fundamental trust obligation of the United States in providing comprehensive health care to American Indians and Alaska Natives. It was last reauthorized in 199213 years ago.
This act is the statutory framework for the Indian health system and covers just
about every aspect of Indian healthcare. S. 1057 builds on that framework by providing significant advancements in health care delivery and by promoting local decisionmaking, tribal self-determination and cooperation with the Indian Health Service.
Those critical improvements include increased access to care, especially for Indian
children and low-income Indians, programs designed to recruit and retain
healthcare professionals on Indian reservations, and alternative financing for
healthcare facilities and other services.
Reauthorization of this Act is a high legislative priority. It has been 6 years in
the makingfar too long for the much needed improvements. Substantial work was
completed last year and we have but a few remaining issues that I hope we can
resolve quickly so that the bill can be enacted soon. I welcome the witnesses and
look forward to the testimony.
381
PREPARED STATEMENT
OF
FROM
WASHINGTON
OF
382
plex treatment, eventually providing higher level services such as root canal completions, permanent crowns and bridges, denture fabrications, and orthodontic assessments not currently available in these remote locations. As the level of dental care
increased in the hub-clinic in Nome, the dental expectation of the community did
too. A decrease in basic dental disease followed. Such a model could be extended
to the villages through the use of Dental Therapists.
Another important aspect is the influence that the Dental Therapists will have
on the school-age children and young adults. A criterion for the selection of all of
the Dental Therapists in the Norton Sound region was that they all possess nice
teeth, value a healthy smile, and practice good oral habits in their daily lives. Many
junior and senior high school girls in the villages, the future mothers of the next
generation, desire to look their best like most American girls. They may wear trendy
clothes, style their hair, and apply cosmetics, but the deteriorated condition of their
teeth negates these other measures. The Dental Therapists will frequently reinforce
the need to alter dietary choices and practice daily oral hygiene to improve this segment of the populations oral health. Through the Dental Therapists own actions,
they can inspire the youth that it is important and cool to have good teeth. It will
not be socially acceptable any longer to brandish a smile of decay -riddled teeth or
missing teeth altogether. Usually the childrens teeth mirror those of the mother,
either good or bad. This will be an excellent opportunity to stop the generational
cycle of rampant tooth decay and premature tooth, loss. The Dental Therapists will
be an ever-present, walking advertisement to the importance of good oral health.
I urge the Senate Committees on Indian Affairs and Health, Education, Labor,
and Pensions to support S. 1057 as it is written. The ability of the Dental Therapists to perform the procedures of fillings, dental pulp treatments, and basic extractions is crucial to their success. The Dental Therapists potential to bring about positive long-term change is greater than that of any number of itinerant dentists, either compensated or volunteer.
383
If I can offer additional information that will help you in your deliberations,
please let me know.
INDIAN HEALTH CARE IMPROVEMENT ACT: QUESTIONS
FOR THE
RECORD
(SENATOR HATCH)
JULY 15, 2005
Panel I
Questions for Ms. Rachel Joseph
National Steering Committee
Chairperson, Lone-Pine Paiute Shoshone Reservation
No. 1. Title VII would authorize a comprehensive behavioral health program, reflecting tribal values and collaboration among various substance abuse, social service, and mental health programs. You spoke of the need to have a systems of care
approach to mental health in addition to this comprehensive package. Can you tell
me specifically what this systems of care approach would add to the comprehensive program already outlined in title VII?
No. 2. The National Steering Committee has a long history with this legislation.
Can you tell us what the major stumbling blocks have been to passing this bill in
the past, and how this bill has addressed these issues?
Panel II
Questions for Mr. Don Kashevaroff
Alaska Native Health Tribal Consortium and Tribal SelfGovernance Advisory Committee
No. 1. What, specifically, are the concerns on the part of the Administration with
negotiated rulemaking and how does this bill address those concerns? Why is negotiated rulemaking of particular importance to tribes?
Questions for Mr. Richard Brannan,
Chairman, Northern Arapaho Tribe
No. 1. In your testimony, you stated that the Arapaho Tribe has a high disproportionate number of diabeticswould you please describe the current state of the dialysis program available to the Arapaho Tribe?
No. 2. Regarding the issue of care for the elderly, you mentioned that most
Arapho elderly, choose to remain in their own homesdo you believe that they
would still remain in their own homes if better facilities were available to them?
No. 3. I understand that family and domestic violence remains a large problem
facing the American Indian population, and that expansion of related services is
vital to combating that problem. What services are currently provided on the Wind
River Reservation with regard to family and domestic violence; and what services
do you suggest be added to enhance the current program?
Questions for Mr. Ralph Forquera,
Executive Director, Seattle Indian Health Board;
and Director, Urban Indian Health Institute
No. 1. I am concerned by your statement about the lack of available data needed
to address the growing health crisis among urban Indiansit appears that this crisis may be much larger than we are even capable of gauging. What are the main
reasons it is so difficult to collect data of urban Indians; and, do you have suggestions of what Congress can do to improve the data collection process?
No. 2. Do you consider the trend toward urbanization to be increasing?
No. 3. With regard to the Federal Tort Claim Act, you stated that inclusion could
save considerable expense for programs that are now purchasing private liability insurance to support their work ? can you provide a hypothetical estimate of those
savings?
Panel III
Questions for Dr. Mary Williard, D.D.S.
Yukon-Kuskokwim Health Corporation, AK
No. 1. You support the current program which permits Dental Health Aide Therapists (DHAT) to perform various procedures on patients in remote areas. The American Dental Association has concerns with three of these procedures (extracting
teeth, drilling cavities, and pulpotomies). What programs are currently in operation
that are similar to the DHAT program? Do participants in these programs perform
these controversial procedures? Can you provide us information on these programs:
384
where they are, how long they have been in operation, what studies have been done
assessing their safety and effectiveness, particularly with regard to these three procedures?
No. 2. You mention that the dental therapists will work under the supervision
of a dentist. Who are these dentists and how can they supervise dental therapists
who are in remote villages? What back-up exists if a procedure runs into unexpected complications?
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830