Enhancing Seal Reliability

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 12

Enhancing Seal Reliability

Pgina 1 de 12

MENU
Home / Articles / 2002 / Enhancing Seal Reliability

Enhancing Seal Reliability


Seal selection and maintenance help ensure environmental compliance and safe, reliable
pump operation
Dec 15, 2002

A pump's mechanical seal is very susceptible to failure in the adverse operating conditions found in
many chemical and petrochemical facilities. Failures not only result in high maintenance costs and
downtime, but also create safety and environmental hazards. Therefore, plants must select a
mechanical seal of the type, arrangement and material of construction (MOC) to suit its specific service
conditions.
However, seal properties get less attention than pump operating parameters and properties. In other
words, the ideal seal often is replaced by an alternative one if the pump's operating parameters satisfy
the service conditions.
This article is based on a mechanical seal reliability assessment performed at Hindustan Petroleum
Corp. Ltd.'s Mumbai Refinery in India. The Mumbai refinery has a seal population of approximately 600.
These seals are used in a variety of service areas, including:
Light hydrocarbons.
Medium hydrocarbons.
Heavy hydrocarbons.
Chemical-handling.
The performance of the seals in the Mumbai Refinery, like that of the seals in other similar facilities, is
greatly influenced by factors such as service temperature, vapor pressure at operating pressure, solids
contained, pump rotating speed and hazard control measures.
Lessons learned from this assessment can help plants determine the shortcomings of their existing seal
systems, set up an appropriate preventive maintenance schedule based on system criticality, and take
any other necessary actions to correct the shortcomings.
Seal lubrication
A seal's operation and longevity depend on maintaining the proper seal operating environment. The
mating area of the seal ring and mating rings must be lubricated with a compatible liquid at the designed

http://www.chemicalprocessing.com/articles/2002/30/

11/14/2016

Enhancing Seal Reliability

Pgina 2 de 12

flow and temperature. The seal ring (face) keeps the mating area leakproof by virtue of axial pressure
against the mating ring, which does not have any axial movement.
Despite the fact that the surface of the seal is lapped to precision flatness, each face develops a natural
surface waviness. The effective operation of a seal depends on the lubricating film between the sliding
faces of the seal. The surface waviness will be larger than the initial waviness of a new surface during
stable operation.
The film allows operation of a seal with minimal wear and power consumption, and also helps prevent
leakage. If the load on the seal face increases, the surface waviness will increase, and patches of the
sealing plane will break through the hydrodynamic film. When this occurs, the seal is operating in a
region of thermoelastic instability. Heavy leakage will occur as portions of the surface that have broken
through the film increase in temperature, turning bright red. The liquid film will begin to carbonize,
vaporize or flash, producing more leakage and seal part wear and making a spitting or sputtering sound.
The flow rate of flush depends on the seal size, operating temperature, speed and specific heat of the
flushing media. The line/orifice size is calculated on the basis of differential pressure between the
flushing media header and the stuffing box. The flush should not impinge directly on the mating area; it
should enter toward the driven side and flow into the seal faces in a streamlined motion.
Table 1 details the seal flushing American Petroleum Institute (API) plans, equipment and preventive
monitoring actions taken on the Mumbai Refinery seal systems.

http://www.chemicalprocessing.com/articles/2002/30/

11/14/2016

Enhancing Seal Reliability

Pgina 3 de 12

To enhance seal life and avoid sudden failures, the refinery uses a number of flushing systems. The
systems were selected according to the application in the particular refinery area.
Sealing faces are lubricated (flushed) with:
Service liquid from discharge (API Plan 11).
Service liquid from discharge through strainer, cooler, regulating orifice (RO), seal (API Plan 22 for
elevated-temperature service).
Service liquid from casing to stuffing box, with stuffing box cooling and steam purging (suitable for hightemperature and congealing liquid service)(API Plans 02, 62).
Compatible fluid (external flushing) with vapor pressure lower than stuffing box pressure at operating
temperature (API Plan 32).
Service liquid (first seal) and external circulating pot lubrication (second seal) with all monitoring
instruments (Plan 52 for double-tandem seal applicable for light inflammable hydrocarbon service).
Self-flush (first seal) and no lubrication and with seal failure monitoring device (second seal) (API Plan
63 for emission containment seal).
No lubrication for dry-running seal with spiral-groove technology applicable for high-speed compressor.
Operation and maintenance
At the Mumbai Refinery, checklists were prepared and circulated to the operators identifying potential
failure modes and immediate remedial actions to avoid failure. The checklists provide details for the
operation crews about the parameters to be checked and the procedures to check them, as well as any
required responses to such situations to avoid failures.
The refinery's preventive maintenance checklists for different types of pumps and their associated seals
are provided on page 33.
An equipment "criticality classification" was performed at the Mumbai Refinery on the basis of a "failure
effect analysis," which considered failure consequence, severity, redundancy, frequency and detection
probability. A detailed preventive maintenance schedule then was prepared and executed, calling for:
Preventive maintenance every three months for critical equipment.

http://www.chemicalprocessing.com/articles/2002/30/

11/14/2016

Enhancing Seal Reliability

Pgina 4 de 12

Preventive maintenance every six months for semicritical equipment.


Preventive maintenance on an "as-needed" basis for noncritical equipment, based on feedback from
daily parameter monitoring.
Preventive maintenance is carried out in compliance with each checklist, and observations are recorded
for analysis.
The criticality of the equipment is determined through the following equation:

http://www.chemicalprocessing.com/articles/2002/30/

11/14/2016

Enhancing Seal Reliability

Pgina 5 de 12

The equipment is critical if it receives a total score of 80 or more; semicritical if it receives a score of 60
or more; and noncritical if it gets a score below 60.
Apart from the previously described preventive maintenance, the refinery also has a "condition
monitoring" schedule. This monitoring is performed on critical equipment once every 10 days; on
semicritical equipment once every three months; and on noncritical equipment on an as-needed basis.
The data collected are analyzed and remedial measures are undertaken on a case-by-case basis.
The parameters that affect the reliability of mechanical seal operation include both direct and indirect
factors.
Direct factors include:
Selection of seal design and components.
Quality of MOC.
Seal assembly/installation.
Seal flushing system.
Cooling system.
Steam purging system.
Indirect factors include:
High vibration.
Misalignment.
Piping stress.
Bearing failure.
Unbalanced rotor.
Starvation (service liquid) vapor locking.
Direct factors.
To avoid adverse effects related to direct factors, the facility should perform a critical review of available
seal designs and components before procurement and should consider only reputable manufacturers.
The right seal enhances the overall equipment reliability, ensuring trouble-free operating conditions, a
high MTBF and lower costs. Each component of the mechanical seal contributes individually to seal
performance; therefore, it is of utmost importance that personnel examine the suitability of each
component for the specific application.
To select the right seal and components, personnel first must determine service media viscosity, vapor
pressure and special service media conditions (e.g., corrosive, abrasive, crystallizing, etc.). Other
factors to consider include operating system pressure, the stuffing box pressure, the rpm of the rotating
face, operating system temperature, the pressure-velocity factor (determined by multiplying the seal

http://www.chemicalprocessing.com/articles/2002/30/

11/14/2016

Enhancing Seal Reliability

Pgina 6 de 12

face pressure and mean peripheral velocity of the seal face) and any environmental requirements
applicable for hazard-free operation. See Table 2.

Ensure all parts include a manufacturer's certified inspection, and that visual and dimensional
inspections also are carried out in-house before installation.
When assembling and installing the seal, the facility team should follow the manufacturer's guidelines
and also should hydrotest the equipment to check for leakage after assembly. Operating crews should
be provided with in-house refresher training, preferably conducted by the manufacturer, once every two
years.
During preventive maintenance, the seal flushing system should be inspected and cleaned. Steam
tracing and insulation should be maintained for elevated-temperature/congealing-liquid service. The
cooling system also should be unplugged and inspected and cleaned.
Also during preventive maintenance, the steam purging system should be checked; checks should
include the condition of line insulation and the steam trap. Any necessary repairs should be made to
ensure dry steam to seal.
The comprehensive checklists should be prepared and given to operation crews. The crews also should
receive in-house training related to rotating equipment reliability improvements that incorporates
mechanical seal operation do's and don'ts (refer to the box).
Indirect factors. With the exception of starvation/vapor locking, most indirect factors effecting seal
reliability can be handled by condition monitoring. Condition monitoring consists of scheduled vibration
monitoring/spectrum analysis/trend analysis, lubrication system checks during preventive maintenance
and physical checks of running equipment parameters followed by remedial action.
Bearings, should be approved by a manufacturer's representative, even if procurement is through an
authorized dealer. Extreme precautions should be taken on the part of operators to avoid starvation
during operation through proper monitoring and control over process parameters.
Root cause failure analysis
If a catastrophic failure occurs, the facility should carry out a detailed root cause failure analysis to
identify the primary cause of failure and the remedial actions necessary to avoid recurrence. See the
Failure Analysis Activity Sheet.
To further enhance mechanical seal reliability and minimize catastrophic failure, the facility should
perform a comprehensive audit of all mechanical sealing systems in coordination with the seal
manufacturer. The objective of the study should be to identify shortcomings in:

http://www.chemicalprocessing.com/articles/2002/30/

11/14/2016

Enhancing Seal Reliability

Pgina 7 de 12

The suitability of each sealing system in its respective service.


The designed environment of seal operation (flushing plan, flush rate, size of RO piping design, etc.).
The scope and feasibility of upgrades.
Compliance to safety and environmental regulations.
Preservation of seal parts.
Assembly and testing procedures.
The Mumbai Refinery audit was completed in May 2001. Based on audit recommendations, the refinery
took actions to rectify deviations in its existing system, per API standards.
Acceptable reliability
The relationship between equipment reliability and its related performance affecting parameter can be
expressed by:
R A x E/C x SH x BDF
Or: R = constant x A x E/C x SH x BDF
Where:
R = reliability.
A = availability factor (hours available/ hours of ideal availability).
E = efficiency (If the equipment is operating at its designed efficiency, then this will be 1. With a pump,
the shutoff pressure and power can be checked to ascertain the efficiency and proportionate deviation
using performance curves. The difference in temperature between discharge and suction also indicates
a loss of efficiency, if the driver's efficiency is assumed to be as designed).
C = cost factor (actual cost incurred/ estimated cost).
SH = safety hazard factor (number of actual hazards/total pieces of equipment having the potential for
hazards. Or the safety hazard factor = esh, where "sh" is number of hazards during the review period).
BDF = breakdown factor (a function of the number of unexpected catastrophic failures during the review
period).
Hence, BDF= ebdr, where "bdr" is the number of unexpected breakdowns during the review period.
The value of the "constant" has a decreasing trend with an increase in equipment criticality. It is a fact
that failure of critical equipment is much more severe and damaging than the failure of noncritical
equipment. Therefore, it is essential for a facility to pay attention to critical equipment to ensure higher
productivity and profitability, as well as a safe operating environment.
The "acceptable reliability" can be calculated by using the above formula in the following manner:
For critical equipment, if the value of the constant is assumed to be the smallest natural number (i.e., 1),
the availability factor accepted (percent value) worldwide is 97 percent.

http://www.chemicalprocessing.com/articles/2002/30/

11/14/2016

Enhancing Seal Reliability

Pgina 8 de 12

In ideal conditions, the equipment delivers the designed efficiency, resulting in an efficiency factor of 1.
The acceptable cost factor is when the estimated cost = actual cost. Therefore, C=1.
Ideally, no hazard and no catastrophic failure should exist, resulting in acceptable respective values of
SH = e0 =1 and BDF = e0 =1.
Therefore:
The acceptable reliability for critical equipment = 1 x 0.97 x 1/1 x 1 x 1 = 0.97.
For semicritical equipment, the value of constant will increase proportionately to the difference in
criticality score values, which could be computed by:
The minimum score for critical = 80 and the minimum score for semicritical = 60. The percentage
difference is 25 percent; therefore, the value of the constant can be assumed to be 1.25 (as compared
to 1 for critical equipment).
The acceptable reliability for semicritical equipment = 1.25 x 0.97 x 1/1 x 1 x 1 =1.21.
The acceptable reliability values, therefore, could be calculated for critical and semicritical equipment
and set as standards for gauging the percentage deviation of reliability for each category unit.

http://www.chemicalprocessing.com/articles/2002/30/

11/14/2016

Enhancing Seal Reliability

Pgina 9 de 12

http://www.chemicalprocessing.com/articles/2002/30/

11/14/2016

Enhancing Seal Reliability

Pgina 10 de 12

Chatterjee is manager of rotary equipment at the Mumbai Refinery. He can be reached at


[email protected].

SHOW MORE CONTENT

Free Subscriptions
E-Newsletters

Digital Editions

chemicalprocessing.com E-Newsletters
Stay ahead of the curve with free e-newsletters and alerts. They are delivered to your inbox on a
regular basis and you may unsubscribe at any time. Subscribe Today.

Most Popular
Past 7 Days

01
02

Past 30 Days

Past 6 Months

All Time

Chemical Makers Roll Out More Bio-Based Feedstocks


Renewable materials continue to expand their role.
Bolster Your Lead Process Safety Metrics
A comprehensive review has identified a number of widely applicable

http://www.chemicalprocessing.com/articles/2002/30/

11/14/2016

Enhancing Seal Reliability

03
04
05

Pgina 11 de 12

Edison Patent Award Goes To NJIT Engineers


NJIT engineers win Edison Patent Award for technology that masks the taste
Cue The Fog Dry Ice Cleans While Machines Are Running

Process Puzzler: Forego False Economies


A penny wise, pound foolish approach prompts plant problems

About

General Information
Contact Us
Subscription Services
Editorial Guidelines
Vaaler Award Information
Media Kit
Upcoming Issue Preview
Editorial Calendar
Content

Editorial Columns and Blogs


News
Ask the Experts Forum
Process Puzzler
Cartoon Gallery
Online Polls
White Papers
Special Reports

http://www.chemicalprocessing.com/articles/2002/30/

11/14/2016

Enhancing Seal Reliability

Pgina 12 de 12

eHandbooks
Webinars
Videos
Podcasts
Products
Reliability-Centered Maintenance
Magazine

Meet the Editors


Meet the Editorial Board
Current Issue
Current CP China Issue
Issue Archive
eNewsletters
Supplier Source Guide
Site Tools

Site Map
Stay Connected

My Account Login/Register
LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Google+
RSS Feeds

Contact Us | Advertise | Privacy Policy | Legal Disclaimers, Terms & Conditions


Copyright 2004 - 2016 Chemical Processing. All rights reserved.
P: 630-467-1300 | 1501 E. Woodfield Road, Suite 400N, Schaumburg, IL 60173

Chemical Processing | Control | Control Design | Food Processing | Pharmaceutical Manufacturing | Plant Services
| Smart Industry

http://www.chemicalprocessing.com/articles/2002/30/

11/14/2016

You might also like