Analysis of A Complex Kind
Analysis of A Complex Kind
Complex Kind
Analysis of a Complex Kind
Week 1
Petra Bonfert-Taylor
P. Bonfert-Taylor
1 / 17
Welcome
About me:
Petra Bonfert-Taylor
Born, raised and educated in Germany (Berlin).
Ph.D. 1996, Technical University of Berlin.
Postdoc at University of Michigan.
Professor at Wesleyan University since 1999.
z = x + iy
s
s
e
n
d
e
t
c
e
n
n
o
c
Riemann
e
s
s
a
r
t
s
r
e
i
e
W
Cauchy
t
e
s
n
e
lim i op
Historical explorations
1
f (a) =
2i
f (z)
dz
z a
an z + an
n
= an (z
1z
z1 )(z
n 1
+ + a1 z + a0
z2 ) (z
zn )
1
X
1
(s) =
s
n
n=1
?
s
r
e
mb
u
n
e
prim
1
1
1
= s + s + s +
1
2
3
Solutions are
m
x=
m2
+b
4
Solutions: .
m
x=
m2
+b
4
m2
What if 4 + b < 0 ?
2
In particular, x = 1 has no real solutions.
p
1.
It is often argued that this led to i =
But... Historically, no interest in non-real solutions
2
since the graphs of y = x and y = mx + b simply
dont intersect in that case.
History
Cubic equations were the real reason. Consider
x3 = px + q
Represents intersection of y = x3 and y = px + q .
There always must be a solution.
Solution to Cubic
6x + 20 !
Bombellis Problem
About 30 years after the discovery of this formula,
Bombelli (1526-1572) considered the equation
x3 = 15x + 4
Bombellis Idea
Bombelli discovered that
q
q
p
p
3
3
2+
121 = 2 +
1 and
2
121 = 2
(2 +
Check it out...
1)3 =